In Vitro Evaluation of the Activity of Terpenes and Cannabidiol against Human Coronavirus E229
Eybna Technologies Ltd., Givat Hen 43905, Israel; adi@eybna.com (A.N.); iris@eybna.com (I.N.); david@eybna.com (D.H.H.); perri@pharmaseedltd.com (P.R.); annav@pharmaseedltd.com (H.V.); ilan@pharmaseedltd.com (I.W.); ronnie@pharmaseedltd.com (R.L.); zohar.kerem@mail.huji.ac.il (Z.K.); zohara@zyb.onmicrosoft.com (Z.Y.); nadav@eybna.com (N.E.)
Abstract
The activity of a new, terpene-based formulation, code-named NT-VRL-1, against Human Coronavirus (HCoV) strain 229E was evaluated in human lung fibroblasts (MRC-5 cells), with and without the addition of cannabidiol (CBD). The main constituents in the terpene formulation used for the experiment were beta caryophyllene, eucalyptol, and citral. The tested formulation exhibited an antiviral effect when it was pre-incubated with the host cells prior to virus infection. The combination of NT-VRL-1 with CBD potentiated the antiviral effect better than the positive controls pyrazofurin and glycyrrhizin. There was a strong correlation between the quantitative results from a cell-viability assay and the cytopathic effect seen under the microscope after 72 h. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of activity of a combination of terpenes and CBD against a coronavirus.
Untitled section
Keywords: antiviral, HCoV-229E, terpenes, CBD, cannabis, COVID-19
Article notes
Untitled section
Received 2021 Mar 3; Accepted 2021 Mar 23; Collection date 2021 Apr.
1. Introduction
Coronaviruses are enveloped, non-segmented, positive-strand RNA viruses of the family Coronaviridae that cause a wide spectrum of illnesses in humans, including respiratory and gastrointestinal diseases [1]. To date, seven human coronaviruses (HCoVs) have been identified. Four of those, HCoV-229E, HCoV-OC43, HCoV-NL63, and HCoV-HKU1, are non-zoonotic and cause worldwide outbreaks of upper respiratory tract infections predominantly in the winter [2]. The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has produced an epidemic of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), which was first identified in December 2019, in China, and then in other regions and countries. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) [3], as of January 26th, 2021, there have been a total of 98,925,221 confirmed cases of COVID-19 worldwide, including 2,127,294 deaths.
This outbreak has led to a search for active antiviral compounds to treat this disease. While SARS-CoV-2 is highly contagious and can only be studied in a biosafety level 4 facility, working with the less virulent strain HCoV-229E is considered a good alternative for preliminary research [2,4,5]. HCoV-229E is associated with various respiratory illnesses ranging from the common cold to severe pneumonia [6]. Recently, the potential of phytochemicals, such as terpenes, for use as potent antiviral agents has received considerable attention, especially because these substances are naturally abundant with relatively low toxicity and cost [7].
Terpenes are natural, volatile compounds primarily extracted from plants, which contain only carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen atoms. In plants, terpenes act as chemoattractants or chemorepellents [8] and are largely responsible for plant fragrances. In animals and humans, terpenes exhibit a variety of pharmacological properties, including anti-inflammatory [9], analgesic [10], antimicrobial [11], and antiviral [12] properties. A wide range of in vitro studies have demonstrated terpenes’ potential for use against a wide range of viruses such as herpes simplex virus [13], bronchitis virus [14], West Nile virus [15], and Human Immunodeficiency Virus 1 (HIV-1) [16].
As isolated compounds and in plant essential oils, terpenes have been shown to have antiviral effects against several types of HCoVs. Glycyrrhizin, a triterpene found in licorice roots, was one of the first compounds found to be active against SARS coronavirus (SARS-CoV) in vitro; it was shown to inhibit SARS-CoV replication with a half maximal effective concentration (EC50) of 365 µM [17]. Glycyrrhizin has also been used to successfully treat SARS patients [18]. Laurus nobilis essential oil, with beta-ocimene, 1,8-cineole, alpha-pinene and beta-pinene as its main constituents, was found to exert antiviral activity against SARS-CoV with a half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) value of 120 mg/mL [19].
Even though the vaccination of the world’s population against COVID-19 has begun and is expected to proceed gradually, there is no clear expectation of completion. However, some individuals will not be vaccinated due to personal choice or health limitations. In addition, several population groups such as younger age groups will be the last to get vaccinated. A natural antiviral solution with minimal side effects that can be used alone or in conjunction with vaccines as a preventative treatment may be a safe and relatively easy way to reduce infection in those populations.
The goal of the present study was to evaluate the antiviral activity of a proprietary terpene formulation (code named NT-VRL-1) against HCoV-229E, with and without the addition of cannabidiol (CBD), and the mode of antiviral action of this formulation during the viral multiplication cycle. The NT-VRL-1 formulation consisted of 30 natural terpenes that are found in cannabis, as well as other plants, where its main constituents are beta caryophyllene, eucalyptol, and citral. The therapeutic activity of these compounds was evaluated in terms of the cytopathic effect observed under an inverted microscope and an in vitro cell viability XTT assay, measurement of metabolically active live cells, involving human lung fibroblasts (MRC-5 cells) in which the mitochondrial activity of those cells was examined.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials and Reagents
MRC-5 cells and the HCoV-229E strain were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; Manassas, VA, USA). All media ingredients and the XTT-based viability assay kit were purchased from Biological Industries (Beit HaEmek, Israel). Cannabidiol (CBD) was purchased from Recipharm Israel (Ness Ziona, Israel). NT-VRL-1 formulation was obtained from Eybna Technologies (Givat Hen, Israel). Glycyrrhizin was obtained from Penta International Corporation (New Jersey, NJ, USA) and pyrazofurin was purchased from Sigma (Jerusalem, Israel).
2.2. Cytotoxicity of Compounds
MRC-5 cells were plated at 1 × 104 cells/well in 96-well plates in minimum essential medium Eagle (EMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum and then incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO2. The next day, the medium was discarded and 100 µL of EMEM supplemented with 1% fetal calf serum was added to the cells, together with the compounds. The following concentrations were tested for each potential treatment. CBD: 2 µg/mL, 5 µg/mL, and 10 µg/mL. NT-VRL-1: 5 µg/mL, 10 µg/mL, 50 µg/mL, and 100 µg/mL. NT-VRL-1 + CBD: 10 µg/mL + 1 µg/mL and 10 µg/mL + 3 µg/mL (respectively). Pyrazofurin: 2 µg/mL, 5 µg/mL, and 10 µg/mL. Glycyrrhizin: 100 µg/mL, 500 µg/mL, and 1000 µg/mL. The cells were incubated for an additional 72 ± 2 h at 34 °C and 5% CO2. Finally, the cells were subjected to an XTT assay. Based on the results of this work, we determined the non-toxic concentrations of the compounds to be used in the efficacy evaluations: CBD (0.5 µg/mL and 1 µg/mL), NT-VRL-1 (2 µg/mL, 5 µg/mL, and 10 µg/mL), NT-VRL-1 + CBD (10 µg/mL + 1 µg/mL), pyrazofurin (5 µg/mL) and glycyrrhizin (400 µg/mL).
2.3. Efficacy of Compounds—Cell Pretreatment
MRC-5 cells were plated at 1 × 104 cells/well in 96-well plates in EMEM supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, and then incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2. The next day, the medium was discarded and 100 µL of EMEM supplemented with 1% fetal calf serum was added to the cells, supplemented with the compounds at concentrations previously identified as nontoxic. The cells were incubated for 1 h at 34 °C and 5% CO2. Next, 1 µL of medium or virus at 100 times the concentration of the infective dose (1:340 dilution) was added to the cells. The cells were incubated for an additional 72 ± 2 h at 34 °C and 5% CO2. Under an inverted microscope, a photograph was taken of the cells in each treatment at 24, 48, and 72 h post-infection. A virus-induced cytopathic effect was observed in comparison with the parallel virus control and cell control. Finally, cells were subjected to an XTT assay.
2.4. Efficacy of Compounds—Virus Pretreatment
MRC-5 cells were plated at 1 × 104 cells/well in 96-well plates in EMEM supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, and then incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2. The next day, 120 µL of EMEM supplemented with 1% fetal calf serum was added to the wells, supplemented with the compounds at concentrations previously identified as nontoxic. The virus was mixed with the compounds in a U-shaped plate and then incubated for 1 h at 34 °C and 5% CO2. Then, 1.2 µL medium or virus at 100 times the concentration of the infective dose was added to the wells. Next, 100 µL of the virus + compounds mixture was added to the cells after medium was removed and the cells were incubated at 34 °C and 5% CO2 for an additional 72 ± 2 h. Under an inverted microscope, photographs of the cells in each treatment were taken at 24, 48, and 72 h post-infection. The virus-induced cytopathic effect was observed in comparison with the parallel virus control and cell control. Finally, cells were subjected to an XTT assay.
2.5. Efficacy of Compounds—Post-Adsorption
MRC-5 cells were plated at 1 × 104 cells/well in 96-well plates in EMEM supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, and then incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2. The next day, medium was discarded and EMEM supplemented with 1% fetal calf serum was added to the cells with or without 1 µL of virus at 100 times the concentration of the infective dose. The cells were then incubated for 1 h at 34 °C and 5% CO2. Then, medium was discarded and 100 µL of EMEM supplemented with 1% fetal calf serum was added to the cells, supplemented with the compounds at the concentrations previously identified as nontoxic and 1 µL of media or virus at 100 times the concentration of the infective dose. The cells were incubated for an additional 72 ± 2 h at 34 °C and 5% CO2. Under an inverted microscope, photographs were taken of the cells in each treatment at 24, 48, and 72 h post-infection. The virus-induced cytopathic effect was observed in comparison with the parallel virus control and cell control. Finally, cells were subjected to an XTT assay.
2.6. XTT-Based Viability Assay
At the end of each incubation period, media was discarded from all wells and 100 µL of fresh culture medium was added to the cells together with 50 µL of XTT reagent. The optical density (OD) was measured at 450 nm (after subtraction of the non-specific OD at 620 nm).
3. Results
3.1. Cytotoxicity of Compounds
The non-cytotoxic concentrations of the various compounds were determined as the concentrations that did not lead to excess cell death, as compared to untreated cells. As shown in Figure 1, the non-toxic concentrations were: (CBD) ≤ 1 µg/mL, NT-VRL-1 ≤ 10 µg/mL, pyrazofurin ≤ 10 µg/mL, and glycyrrhizin ≤ 500 µg/mL.
3.2. Efficacy of Compounds—Cell Pretreatment
MRC-5 cells were pretreated with the compounds prior to inoculation with HCoV-229E. As shown in Figure 2, the viability of cells that were infected with HCoV-229E, but otherwise untreated, was reduced to ~40% of the viability of the uninfected control cells. Pre-incubation of the cells with all of the compounds prior to virus inoculation rescued the cells and increased the level of cell viability. The combination of 10 µg/mL NT-VRL-1 with 1 µg/mL CBD was the most effective treatment associated with the highest level of cell viability (p < 0.001). This pattern was also observed in terms of the cytopathic effect seen under the microscope after 72 h. Swelling and clumping of the MRC-5 cells was observed 72 h after viral infection (Figure 3). Cell pretreatment with NT-VRL-1 alone (Figure 3C) or NT-VRL-1 + CBD (Figure 3D) before viral infection prevented a cytopathic effect.
3.3. Efficacy of Compounds—Virus Pretreatment
HCoV-229E was incubated with the compounds before it was introduced to the MRC-5 cells. As shown in Figure 4, inoculation with HCoV-229E (pre-incubation with assay medium) reduced the viability to 80%. Pre-incubation of the virus with 10 µg/mL NT-VRL-1 + 1 µg/mL CBD prior to its introduction to host cells elevated cell viability back to the level observed for the control (p < 0.001). In addition, virus pretreatment with NT-VRL-1 + CBD prevented a cytopathic effect after the cells were inoculated with the virus (Figure 5).
3.4. Efficacy of Compounds—Post-Adsorption
When the compounds were added to the cells after virus adsorption, the viability of the HCoV-229E-infected cells was reduced to only ~70% of the control, as shown in Figure 6. Under these conditions, 10 µg/mL NT-VRL-1 + 1 µg/mL CBD prevented cell death and preserved a level of cell viability similar to that observed for the control (p < 0.001). Pyrazofurin at 5 µg/mL also enhanced cell viability (p < 0.05) relative to the untreated, infected control. Similar results were observed in terms of the cytopathic effect after 72 h, at which point NT-VRL-1 by itself (Figure 7C) and NT-VRL-1 + CBD (Figure 7D) both prevented cell damage.
4. Discussion
Human coronaviruses have presented a great burden to global health since the 1960s [20]. The development of novel, effective antiviral solutions with low toxicity and few side effects is a matter of great interest. Secondary plant metabolites such as terpenes and cannabinoids have been shown to have significant antiviral potential and low toxicity, making them good candidates for use as antiviral agents with minimal side effects [21].
With global COVID-19 vaccination in its initial stages, the timeframe for full global vaccination is still unknown. Several population groups, such as the youngest age groups and people with health limitations, will take longer to vaccinate. Therefore, a preventative antiviral treatment to be used in conjunction with vaccines or even temporarily until vaccination or other alternatives become available would be valuable.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the anti-viral activity of the NT-VRL-1 terpene formulation, with and without CBD, against human HCoV-229E in human lung fibroblasts in vitro. In this study, we report the antiviral activity of the NT-VRL-1 terpene formulation and show that that activity was enhanced when it was applied together with CBD, suggesting either a synergetic or additive effect between the terpene formulation and CBD. Several studies have suggested that phytochemicals found in cannabis may be useful as potential anti-inflammatory agents [22,23]. Such activity may be particularly useful for controlling the cytokine storm syndrome and acute respiratory distress syndrome associated with COVID-19. This study is the first to test cannabis phytochemicals for use against a coronavirus.
Pyrazofurin, a natural antiviral compound that has been shown to be effective against SARS-associated coronaviruses [17], was used as positive control. Glycyrrhizin, which has been shown to have antiviral effect against SARS-associated coronaviruses [24], served as the second positive control.
The mode of antiviral action of NT-VRL-1 was determined by the addition of the compounds to uninfected lung cells, before or after those cells were inoculated with HCoV-229E. The time-of-addition assays can help us to determine the point(s) at which our compound inhibits HCoV-229E replication.
Our results demonstrate that NT-VRL-1’s antiviral effect was most pronounced in the pretreatment system, which may indicate that the compounds’ antiviral effect is based on the prevention of viral attachment and/or entry. Previous studies involving terpenes have proposed an antiviral mechanism which includes interference with virion envelop structures or masking of viral structures, therefore inhibiting the absorption of the virus into host cell [12,13,24]. The specific mechanism of NT-VRL-1’s activity against HCoV-229E is still unclear and needs to be further researched.
In the pretreatment system, both CBD (at 0.5–1 µg/mL) and NT-VRL-1 (at 2–10 µg/mL) exhibited observable antiviral effects, as did the positive controls (pyrazofurin at 5 µg/mL and glycyrrhizin at 400 µg/mL). In addition, when CBD (1 µg/mL) and NT-VRL-1 (10 µg/mL) were applied together, we observed a synergistic antiviral effect that was even stronger than that observed for the positive controls.
Terpenes have been shown to have antiviral activity against SARS-CoV [17,19]. However, in previous studies, the terpenes were added to the virus at the same time and no time-of-addition assays were performed. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the antiviral mode of action of terpenes and CBD against a coronavirus.
NT-VRL-1 exhibited an antiviral effect and should preferably be pre-incubated with cells prior to virus exposure. The combination of NT-VRL-1 with CBD amplified this antiviral effect. These results suggest that NT-VRL with or without CBD could be useful as a preventative measure against coronaviruses. As the lungs are the organs most affected by COVID-19, preventative treatment directly to the lungs, possibly via inhalation, would be the ideal administration route for this potential therapeutic solution.
Acknowledgments
We thank Eybna team for their constant encouragement throughout this project. We would like to thank Ina Stelmah and Shlomit Lempert for their supportive efforts and helpful suggestions. We gratefully acknowledge the support of our work and our ideas by our partner Seach Medical Group. Finally, we thank Yaakov Amidror for the valuable discussions related to this work.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest
Lior Chatow, Adi Nudel David Hayo Hemo and Nadav Eyal are employees of Eybna Technologies, a company that manufactures terpene formulations. Zohara Yaniv, Zohar Kerem and Iris Nesher are advisors of Eybna Technologies. Perri Rozenberg, Hanna Voropaev, Ilan Winkler and Ronnie Levy are employees of Pharmaseed, a pre-Clinical CRO.
Footnotes
Footnote Group
References
Untitled section
References
- 1.Belouzard S., Millet J.K., Licitra B.N., Whittaker G.R. Mechanisms of coronavirus cell entry mediated by the viral spike protein. Viruses. 2012;4:1011–1033. doi: 10.3390/v4061011.
- 2.Signer J., Jonsdottir H.R., Albrich W.C., Strasser M., Züst R., Ryter S., Ackermann-Gäumann R., Lenz N., Siegrist D., Suter A., et al. In vitro virucidal activity of Echinaforce®, an Echinacea purpurea preparation, against coronaviruses, including common cold coronavirus 229E and SARS-CoV-2. Virol. J. 2020;17:136. doi: 10.1186/s12985-020-01401-2.
- 3.World Health Organization Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard. [(accessed on 29 March 2021)]; Available online: https://covid19.who.int/
- 4.Ma Q., Li R., Pan W., Huang W., Liu B., Xie Y., Wang Z., Li C., Jiang H., Huang J., et al. Phillyrin (KD-1) exerts anti-viral and anti-inflammatory activities against novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) and human coronavirus 229E (HCoV-229E) by suppressing the nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) signaling pathway. Phytomedicine. 2020;78:153296. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2020.153296.
- 5.Parang K., El-Sayed N.S., Kazeminy A.J., Tiwari R.K. Comparative antiviral activity of remdesivir and anti-HIV nucleoside analogs against human coronavirus 229E (HCoV-229E) Molecules. 2020;25:2343. doi: 10.3390/molecules25102343.
- 6.Pene F., Merlat A., Vabret A., Rozenberg F., Buzyn A., Dreyfus F., Cariou A., Freymuth F., Lebon P. Coronavirus 229E-related pneumonia in immunocompromised patients. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2003;37:929–932. doi: 10.1086/377612.
- 7.Lillehoj H., Liu Y., Calsamiglia S., Fernandez-Miyakawa M.E., Chi F., Cravens R.L., Oh S., Gay C.G. Phytochemicals as antibiotic alternatives to promote growth and enhance host health. Vet. Res. 2018;49:76. doi: 10.1186/s13567-018-0562-6.
- 8.McGarvey D.J., Croteau R. Terpenoid metabolism. Plant Cell. 1995;7:1015–1026. doi: 10.1105/tpc.7.7.1015.
- 9.Prakash V. Terpenoids as source of anti-inflammatory compounds. Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 2017;10:68–76. doi: 10.22159/ajpcr.2017.v10i3.16435.
- 10.Guimarães A.G., Quintans J.S., Quintans L.J. Monoterpenes with analgesic activity—A systematic review. Phytother. Res. 2013;27:1–15. doi: 10.1002/ptr.4686.
- 11.Guimarães A.C., Meireles L.M., Lemos M.F., Guimarães M.C.C., Endringer D.C., Fronza M., Scherer R. Antibacterial activity of terpenes and terpenoids present in essential oils. Molecules. 2019;24:2471. doi: 10.3390/molecules24132471.
- 12.Astani A., Reichling J., Schnitzler P. Comparative study on the antiviral activity of selected monoterpenes derived from essential oils. Phytother Res. 2010;24:673–679. doi: 10.1002/ptr.2955.
- 13.Astani A., Schnitzler P. Antiviral activity of monoterpenes beta-pinene and limonene against herpes simplex virus in vitro. Iran J. Microbiol. 2014;6:149–155.
- 14.Yang Z., Wu N., Zu Y., Fu Y. Comparative anti-infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) activity of (−)-pinene: Effect on nucleocapsid (N) protein. Molecules. 2011;16:1044–1054. doi: 10.3390/molecules16021044.
- 15.Zamora A., Edmonds J.H., Reynolds M.J., Khromykh A.A., Ralph S.J. The in vitro and in vivo antiviral properties of combined monoterpene alcohols against West Nile virus infection. Virology. 2016;495:18–32. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2016.04.021.
- 16.Bicchi C., Rubiolo P., Ballero M., Sanna C., Matteodo M., Esposito F., Zinzula L., Tramontano E. HIV-1-inhibiting activity of the essential oil of Ridolfia segetum and Oenanthe crocata. Planta Med. 2009;75:1331–1335. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1185546.
- 17.Cinatl J., Morgenstern B., Bauer G., Chandra P., Rabenau H., Doerr H.W. Glycyrrhizin, an active component of liquorice roots, and replication of SARS-associated coronavirus. Lancet. 2003;361:2045–2046. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13615-X.
- 18.Haiying L., Na H., Xiaoyuan X. The curative effects of glycyrrhizin on patients with SARS; Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Society of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases; Wuhan, China. 18‒22 October 2003.
- 19.Loizzo M.R., Saab A.M., Tundis R., Statti G.A., Menichini F., Lampronti I., Gambari R., Cinatl J., Doerr H.W. Phytochemical analysis and in vitro antiviral activities of the essential oils of seven Lebanon species. Chem. Biodivers. 2008;5:461–470. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.200890045.
- 20.Tyrrell D.A., Bynoe M.L. Cultivation of viruses from a high proportion of patients with colds. Lancet. 1966;1:76–77. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(66)92364-6.
- 21.Biswas D., Nandy S., Mukherjee A., Pandey D.K., Dey A. Moringa oleifera Lam and derived phytochemicals as promising antiviral agents: A review. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2020;129:272–282. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2019.07.049.
- 22.Kovalchuk A., Wang B., Li D., Rodriguez-Juarez R., Ilnytskyy S., Kovalchuk I., Kovalchuk O. Fighting the storm: Could novel anti-TNFα and anti-IL-6 C. sativa cultivars tame cytokine storm in COVID-19? Aging. 2021;13:1571–1590. doi: 10.18632/aging.202500.
- 23.Anil S.M., Shalev N., Vinayaka A.C., Nadarajan S., Namdar D., Belausov E., Shoval I., Mani K.A., Mechrez G., Koltai H. Cannabis compounds exhibit anti-inflammatory activity in vitro in COVID-19-related inflammation in lung epithelial cells and pro-inflammatory activity in macrophages. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:1462. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81049-2.
- 24.Hoever G., Baltina L., Michaelis M., Kondratenko R., Baltina L., Tolstikov G.A., Doerr H.W., Cinatl J. Antiviral activity of glycyrrhizic acid derivatives against SARS coronavirus. J. Med. Chem. 2005;48:1256–1259. doi: 10.1021/jm0493008.