Cannabinoid Receptors Signaling in the Development, Epigenetics, and Tumours of Male Germ Cells.

Abstract

Endocannabinoids are natural lipid molecules whose levels are regulated by specific biosynthetic and degradative enzymes. They bind to and activate two main cannabinoid receptors type 1 (CB₁) and type 2 (CB₂), and together with their metabolizing enzymes form the “endocannabinoid system” (ECS). In the last years, the relevance of endocannabinoids (eCBs) as critical modulators in various aspects of male reproduction has been pointed out. Mammalian male germ cells, from mitotic to haploid stage, have a complete ECS which is modulated during spermatogenesis. Compelling evidence indicate that in the testis an appropriate “eCBs tone”, associated to a balanced CB receptors signaling, is critical for spermatogenesis and for the formation of mature and fertilizing spermatozoa. Any alteration of this system negatively affects male reproduction, from germ cell differentiation to sperm functions, and might have also an impact on testicular tumours. Indeed, most of testicular tumours develop during early germ-cell development in which a maturation arrest is thought to be the first key event leading to malignant transformation. Considering the ever-growing number and complexity of the data on ECS, this review focuses on the role of cannabinoid receptors CB₁ and CB₂ signaling in male germ cells development from gonocyte up to mature spermatozoa and in the induction of epigenetic alterations in these cells which might be transmitted to the progeny. Furthermore, we present new evidence on their relevance in testicular cancer.

Untitled section

Keywords: male germ cells, spermatogenesis, sperm, testicular tumors, embryonal carcinoma, cannabis, epigenetic, endocannabinoid system, intergenerational

Article notes

Untitled section

Received 2019 Nov 25; Accepted 2019 Dec 16; Collection date 2020 Jan.

Author notes

1. Introduction

Spermatogenesis is a highly coordinated process in which male germ cells differentiate passing through three major phases: mitotic proliferation of spermatogonia, meiosis in spermatocytes, and spermiogenesis, i.e., the morphogenetic process by which haploid round spermatids form mature spermatozoa [1]. The correct progression of germ cell differentiation and the release of a normal number of spermatozoa with fertilizing activity is regulated by gonadotropins follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH), steroid hormones, and a complex network of autocrine and paracrine factors including endocannabinoids (eCBs) [2]. The biological actions of eCBs are mediated by two main cannabinoid receptors: CB₁ and CB₂. Altogether, cannabinoid receptors, eCBs, and all the enzymes involved in their biosynthesis and degradation form the endocannabinoid system (ECS). ECS is deeply involved in the control of male reproduction and alterations in the system have adverse effects on various stages of germ cell differentiation, from gametogenesis to sperm motility, capacitation, and fertilizing ability [2]. In this review we summarize the most important results of cannabinoid receptors signaling in male germ cells as well as in testicular tumours.

2. Male Germ Cell Development

In mice, germ cell development begins with the specification of primordial germ cells (PGCs), the precursors of gametes. They are first detectable in extra-embryonic regions during the early embryonic period [3] and then migrate into the undifferentiated gonads. During migration and colonization of the gonads, PGCs are characterized by intense mitotic proliferation. In the fetal testis, PGCs differentiate into pre-spermatogonia which undergo mitotic arrest in the G1/G0 stage until birth, when quiescent cells re-starts to proliferate. At puberty, they enter the first wave of spermatogenesis characterized by spermatogonial entry into meiosis and further differentiation to form immature sperm. This process extends throughout the male adult life and comprises continuous spermatogenic cycles starting from spermatogonia stem cells. In the adult mouse testis, in which the cycle and the wave of the seminiferous epithelium are well established, undifferentiated spermatogonial stem cells (known as A-single spermatogonia (As)) can both renew themselves or produce more differentiated A-paired spermatogonia (Apr). The Apr cells then divide into A-aligned spermatogonia (Aal) that further differentiate into A1 spermatogonia [4]. The appearance of A1 spermatogonia coincides with the re-expression of the c-Kit gene, which encodes the receptor for the Kit ligand (KL) and which had been previously downregulated in the male fetal testis at the time of mitotic quiescence. Kit is a tyrosine kinase receptor that mediates proliferation/survival signals in type A spermatogonia [5]. Upon Kit expression, spermatogonia become sensitive to KL produced by Sertoli cells [6] and undergo a finite number of proliferative cycles (forming the A2–A4, intermediate, and B spermatogonia), before entering meiosis. Thus, the temporal appearance of Kit expression and KL sensitivity in spermatogonia marks the switch from the Aal spermatogonia to the A1–B differentiating cell types. In addition to KL, proliferation and differentiation of mitotic spermatogonia in the pre-pubertal testis, as well as the subsequent progression of the differentiation program, also depend on the production of at least two additional growth factors by the nursing Sertoli cells within the seminiferous tubules: glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), acting on the spermatogonial stem cells [7], and Bone Morphogenetic Protein 4 (BMP4), which also acts directly on the spermatogonial compartment up-regulating Kit expression [8]. Following the last mitotic division, spermatogonia progresses into meiosis as preleptotene spermatocytes. The entry into meiosis is a critical step in spermatogenesis and an essential role in promoting this step is played by the all-trans retinoic acid derivative (ATRA) [9], which may control the timing of meiosis, at least partially, by influencing both the somatic and the germ cell compartment of the postnatal testis through the activation of the KL/Kit system [10] and by inducing the expression of Stra8 gene [9,11].

In this context, we recently identified ECS as an important autocrine-paracrine regulator of meiotic entry in postnatal male germ cells [12], that acts along with ATRA in an additive manner [13]. Upon meiotic entrance, preleptotene spermatocytes undergo the last round of DNA synthesis and progress into the leptotene stage initiating the process of meiotic recombination. Recombination requires a programmed introduction into the genome of double-strand breaks (DSBs) by the topoisomerase VI-like protein SPO11 [14,15] that allows the formation of synapsis between homologous chromosomes and DNA exchanges, called crossing-overs [16]. Crossing-over formation is crucial to ensure the shuffling of the genome, as well as the proper segregation of chromosomes at the first meiotic division [16]. A key event of prophase I is the development of the synaptonemal complex (SC), a zipper-like high-order chromosome structure formed by an axial/lateral element containing the SYCP3 protein and a central element containing the protein SYCP1. The first meiotic division is then followed by a second division not preceded by DNA replication so that the two successive cell divisions produce haploid spermatids that will differentiate into sperm through a process called spermiogenesis.

Post-meiotic stages appear to be regulated by the Sertoli cell-mediated action of androgens [17]. In the end, spermatozoa, released in the lumen of the seminipherous tubules, acquire motility during the transit in the epididymis and then capacitation within the female genital tract.

3. Epigenetic Modifications in Male Germ Cell Development

Several stages of male germ cell development, from PGCs specification to spermatozoa development, are regulated by epigenetic mechanisms. The establishment and maintenance of the epigenetic program during germ cell development is associated with appropriate gamete functions and alterations of the germ cell epigenome might impact fertility and, importantly, may be transmitted to the next generation [18].

Epigenetic modifications are heritable and possibly reversible modifications in gene expression that do not involve alterations in the DNA sequence. Epigenetic mechanisms include DNA methylation, post-translational modifications of histones, and noncoding RNA (miRNA). DNA methylation is one of the most studied epigenetic modification during development. In mammals, de novo DNA methylation is established by DNA methyltransferases, DNMT3A and DNMT3B, and is then maintained by DNMT1 during cell division [19]. Instead, Ten-eleven translocation methylcytosine dioxygenase (TETs) proteins, including TET1, TET2, and TET3, are crucial regulators of active DNA demethylation and catalyze the oxidation of 5-methylcytosine (5mC) to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) [20]. Different post-translational modifications can occur in histones such as acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, ubiquitination, ADP addition and ribosylation, which control gene transcription.

Chromatin epigenetic reprogramming starts very early in utero in the germline, soon after primordial germ cell (PGC) specification, at around 7 days post coitum (dpc), and proceeds throughout their migration and proliferation period through erasure of DNA methylation [21] and remodeling of histone modifications [22,23]. Passive DNA demethylation along with TET1 and TET2 activation erases the epiblast-specific and the parental-specific patterns of DNA methylation, respectively, both in male and female PGCs by 13.5 dpc of development [24]. However, some methylation sites escape have been detected in germ cells [24,25], identifying potential targets loci for transgenerational inheritance. Concomitantly, histone modifications occur predominantly on H3K9me2, that starts to be inhibited at 7.25 dpc, and on H3K27me3, that increases at 8.25 dpc [26].

By 13.5 dpc up to birth, male germ cells, defined as pro-spermatogonia, initiate de novo DNA methylation by increasing DNMT3A and DNMT3L synthesis [24,27]. De novo DNA methylation occurs in germ cells in a sex-specific manner and CpG and non-CpG methylation are established in mitotically arrested gonocytes. In males, methylation imprints in germ cells are mostly completed before birth and are maintained post-natally.

Another period of epigenomic reprogramming coincides with the onset of spermatogenesis and the entry into meiosis. Spermatogonia show unique histone methylation pattern such as low H3K9me2 levels [28,29] that dynamically changes following meiotic entry¹² in parallel to a global enrichment in H3K4me3 when they reach the leptotene stage of prophase I. The trimethylation at specific H3K4, at meiotic entry, is linked to the activity of meiosis-specific KRAB-domain zinc finger methyltransferase PRDM9 [30,31,32] that specifies the recombination hotspots, where DSBs are made at leptonema, essential for progression through prophase I. Additionally, male germ cells express several histone variants, including TH2A, TH2B, TH3, H3.3A, H3.3B, and HT1, which become incorporated into differentiating spermatogonia and/or spermatocytes [33] to remodel chromatin during meiosis.

In the final stages of spermatogenesis, haploid round spermatids undergo several biochemical and morphological changes that include an extensive remodeling of chromatin in which testis-specific histones are transiently replaced first by transition proteins (TNPs; TNP1 and TNP2) and then by protamines (PRMs; PRM1 and PRM2). Protamine has a critical role in spermatid differentiation and their deficiency can lead to sperm DNA damage and embryonic death in mice [34].

4. Endocannabinoid System and Male Reproduction

During the last twenty years, an ever-growing number of studies have focused attention on endocannabinoids as important physiological regulators of male reproduction [2,35,36]. Endocannabinoids are natural small lipid molecules widely distributed in the body. The two most studied endocannabinoids are N-arachidonoylethanolamine (anandamide; AEA) and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG). AEA was the first endocannabinoid to be discovered in 1992 [37] and its name derived from the word “Ananda” which means “bliss” in Sanskrit, describing the euphoric effects of this ligand. Indeed AEA binds to and activates the same receptor as the phytocannabinoid Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the active principle of Cannabis sativa [38]. The second eCB identified was 2-arachidonylglycerol (2-AG) [39]. AEA synthesis is catalysed by an N-acylphosphatidylethanolamine-specific phospholipase D (NAPE-PLD) [40], while the formation of 2-AG occurs by hydrolysis of inositol phospholipids through a specific phospholipase C (PLC) to generate diacylglycerol (DAG), which is then converted into 2-AG by an sn-1-DAG lipase (DAGL) [41]. Two specific enzymes control ECs degradation: the fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) that preferentially degrades AEA (2-AG to a less extent) [42] and the monoacylglycerol-lipase (MAGL) that hydrolyzes 2-AG [43]. In the brain, 2-AG is found at higher levels then AEA under most physiological conditions, indicating that 2-AG is the most efficacious endogenous natural ligand for the cannabinoid receptors [44]. AEA, but not 2-AG, also behaves as an endovanilloid, binding to and activating the type-1 vanilloid receptor (transient receptor potential vanilloid 1, TRPV1) at an intracellular site [45]. Endocannabinoids are released “on-demand” from membrane phospholipid precursors and their tone is established by the balance between their biosynthesis and degradation. The biological actions of eCBs are mediated by two main cannabinoid receptors: CB₁ and CB₂. Endocannabinoids and their receptors are present in the testis of invertebrates and vertebrates, including sea urchins, frogs, rats, mice, boars, and humans [35,36]. This conserved expression across species supports the fact that endocannabinoid signaling plays important roles in male reproductive functions. Strong evidence indicates that eCBs and signaling cascades via cannabinoid receptors regulate different biological activities on male reproduction by acting at central and gonadal levels [46]: they modulate pituitary-gonad (HPG) axis, Sertoli and Leydig cells functions, germ cell differentiation [2], and sperm functions [47,48]. Consequently, any changes in the tone of eCbs and/or in the expression of cannabinoid receptors CB₁ or CB₂ may have consequences on reproductive health. Accordingly, in humans, low AEA levels and decreased cannabinoid receptor mRNA transcripts have been found in seminal plasma of men with asthenozoospermia or oligoasthenoteratozoospermia [49,50].

Mammalian male germ cells, from mitotic to haploid stage, have a complete and active ECS which is modulated during spermatogenesis [12,51]. In the mouse, ECS has been hypothesized to control at least two critical steps of the germ cell differentiation required for the success of spermatogenesis as indicated in Figure 1. At an early phase of spermatogenesis, testicular 2-AG, produced at a high level by spermatogonia, might act as an autocrine factor via CB₂, promoting their meiotic entry. In the final steps of spermatogenesis, AEA, produced by Sertoli cells [52] and/or by spermatids [12], might act on spermatids as a paracrine/autocrine factor, via CB₁, regulating spermiogenesis (Figure 1). In this way, continuous sperm production, throughout the reproductive lifetime, is guaranteed by the action of ECS that controls the balance between meiotic entry of spermatogonia and spermiation. A similar expression pattern of many components of the ECS has been recently described in human germ cells, suggesting that eCBs might also play a role in the regulation of human spermatogenesis [53]. Consequently, exogenous cannabinoids exposure, as in Cannabis C. sativa users, could over-activate the system with a negative impact on male fertility. Interestingly, in humans, C. sativa use, is associated with impotence, decreased testosterone level, impairment of spermatogenesis, reduction of sperm motility and viability; more recently, it has been associated with alterations in sperm epigenome in humans, rats [54], and mice [55]. This last observation is strongly relevant for the potential impact on the gamete function of transmitting information to the next generation.

Endocannabinoid system in male germ cell development. Mammalian male germ cells at different stages of differentiation, from mitotic cells (spermatogonia), meiotic cells (spermatocytes) up to haploid stage (spermatids) and spermatozoa, have a complete and active ECS which is modulated during spermatogenesis. In the mouse, ECS controls at least two critical steps of the germ cell differentiation: meiosis and spermiogenesis. In mouse testis, spermatogonia express the higher level of CB2 receptor that dramatically decreases in spermatocytes, reaching a very low level in spermatids and disappearing in mouse spermatozoa. On the contrary CB1 starts to be expressed in haploid cells. Interestingly, spermatogonia also possess the higher level of the endocannabinoid 2-AG, which decreases in spermatocytes (~2-fold) and in spermatids (~20-fold), while AEA is constantly present during spermatogenesis. Accordingly, spermatogonia express higher and lower levels of 2-AG biosynthetic and degrading enzymes, respectively, as compared to meiotic and postmeiotic cells (not shown). Scale bar: 10 µM. ECS—Endocannabinoid system; CB—Cannabinoid receptor; 2-AG—2-arachidonylglycerol; AEA—Anandamide. — Figure 1Endocannabinoid system in male germ cell development. Mammalian male germ cells at different stages of differentiation, from mitotic cells (spermatogonia), meiotic cells (spermatocytes) up to haploid stage (spermatids) and spermatozoa, have a complete and active ECS which is modulated during spermatogenesis. In the mouse, ECS controls at least two critical steps of the germ cell differentiation: meiosis and spermiogenesis. In mouse testis, spermatogonia express the higher level of CB₂ receptor that dramatically decreases in spermatocytes, reaching a very low level in spermatids and disappearing in mouse spermatozoa. On the contrary CB₁ starts to be expressed in haploid cells. Interestingly, spermatogonia also possess the higher level of the endocannabinoid 2-AG, which decreases in spermatocytes (~2-fold) and in spermatids (~20-fold), while AEA is constantly present during spermatogenesis. Accordingly, spermatogonia express higher and lower levels of 2-AG biosynthetic and degrading enzymes, respectively, as compared to meiotic and postmeiotic cells (not shown). Scale bar: 10 µM. ECS—Endocannabinoid system; CB—Cannabinoid receptor; 2-AG—2-arachidonylglycerol; AEA—Anandamide.

5. Cannabinoid Receptors in Male Germ Cell Development

Cannabinoid receptors are members of the superfamily of seven-transmembrane-spanning receptors and are coupled with G proteins. Both cannabinoid receptors, CB₁ and CB₂, are implicated in male reproductive biology [2,35,36]. However, they seem to have specific expression in germ cells at different stages of differentiation and distinct roles in regulating fertility. Here we will discuss on the importance of cannabinoid receptors signaling in the regulation of several stages of male germ cell development and their role in mediating epigenetic modifications.

5.1. Cannabinoid Receptor CB₁

CB₁ is prominently expressed in the central nervous system (CNS) and has attracted great attention as a modulator of different brain functions. It is most abundant in the hippocampus, basal ganglia, cerebellum, and prefrontal cortex and is involved in a variety of physiological functions including appetite, fear, anxiety and pain [56,57,58]. However, it has also been detected in peripheral tissues including the reproductive system. CB₁ is encoded by the gene CNR1 and consists of 472 amino acids in humans, 473 amino acids in rats and mice, with 97–99% amino acid sequence identity among these species. In addition to the canonical long form, the presence of splice isoforms both in humans and mice [59], coming from 5′-UTR introns of the gene, have been described. These three isoforms are differentially expressed in the human brain, skeletal muscle, liver, and pancreatic islet [60] and via different signaling properties, contribute to the CB₁ receptor physiology.

In the testis, CB₁ is expressed by somatic and germ cells of mammalian and non-mammalian vertebrates and its activity is correlated to the Leydig cell differentiation, steroidogenesis, spermiogenesis, sperm maturation, and quality. In both rat and mouse, a key role for CB₁ has been demonstrated in Leydig cell development, and its expression in these cells positively correlates with differentiation events and negatively with respect to their proliferation [47,61].

In mouse germ cells, CB₁ mRNAs expression is detectable in fetal gonocytes starting from E11.5 and their expression level remains low and constant during embryo development and after birth [62]. A higher level of CB₁ starts to be expressed during spermatogenesis in haploid cells and became more evident in sperm, indicating a role of this receptor in the final steps of germ cell differentiation such as spermiogenesis and acquisition of functional properties. It has been demonstrated that Cb1−/− male mice show inefficient histone displacement and produce spermatozoa with uncondensed chromatin and damaged DNA [63] indicating that CB₁ is involved in spermiogenesis and, in particular, plays a role in chromatin remodeling by regulating histone displacement and Tnp2 expression levels.

Mouse sperm express an even higher level of CB₁, and its activation causes adverse effects on sperm function including inhibition of motility, capacitation, and acrosome reaction [64]. On the other hand, in the absence of CB₁ signaling, sperm acquire motility precociously and the percentage of motile spermatozoa recovered from the caput of the epididymis is higher with respect to wild-type mice, suggesting a physiological role of this receptor in controlling sperm motility in the epididymis [48]. Physiologically, a gradient of the endocannabinoid 2-AG in the epididymis prevents activation of sperm motility in caput, through activation of CB₁ [65]. Similarly, in humans, CB₁ is expressed by sperm and its activation inhibits motility by decreasing mitochondrial activity [66], while CB₁ inhibition through the use of rimonabant, a CB₁ antagonist, is able to increase sperm motility and viability and to induce acrosome reaction and capacitation [67].

In human sperm, CB₁ receptor is localized in the plasma membranes of the head and middle piece and has been also identified intracellularly on the mitochondria membrane (mtCB₁) [66,67,68,69]. Although the expression of functional intracellular CB₁ in mitochondria has been demonstrated [70,71] in other tissues such as brain [72] and skeletal muscles [73], where it can regulate cellular respiration and other bioenergetic processes [71,74]; the role of mtCB₁ in sperm is not entirely clarified. The fact that mitochondria are the principal suppliers of sperm energy and that cannabinoids are potent inhibitors of sperm mitochondrial O2 consumption [69] suggests that mtCB₁ could mediate adverse effects of cannabinoid drugs on mitochondrial functionality and thereforeexplain the negative effects on sperm motility.

In human sperm cells, CB₁ has been found co-localized with the vanilloid receptor TRPV1, known as the heat-sensing receptor [75]. TRPV1 is activated by temperatures higher than 42 °C [76,77] and has been suggested to be a mediator of sperm thermotaxis in humans [78] and to play a role in the stabilization of the plasma membranes in capacitated sperm [79]. Mammalian spermatozoa, immediately after ejaculation, are unable to fertilize the oocytes and acquire this competence during the transit within the female genital tract. Sperm cells undergo a series of morpho-functional modifications, known as “capacitation” [80] that allow them to become able to recognize the oocyte and to extrude the content of acrosomal vesicle (acrosome reaction, AR), thus penetrating the zona pellucida (ZP) and reaching the oocyte membrane. It has been proposed that both the receptors CB₁ and TRPV1 [81,82] could participate in the modulation of spermatozoa maturation allowing sperm to acquire fertilizing ability [82,83]. Specifically, CB₁ could be implicated in the Gi protein/cAMP/PKA pathway in the early stages of post ejaculation, promoting the maintenance of membrane stability and avoiding premature acrosome reaction. TRPV1, on the contrary, could be activated in the latest stages of capacitation determining the rapid increase in intracellular calcium concentration needed for acrosome reaction. The observation that TRPV1 expression, at mRNA and protein level, is not limited to human sperm cells but has been detected also in murine germ cells from spermatocyte to spermatozoa and in Sertoli cells [12,78] suggests its potential protective role against heat stress and in conferring heat resistance to male germ cells [84].

5.2. Cannabinoid receptor CB₂

CB₂ is referred to as the peripheral cannabinoid receptor since it is predominantly expressed in the immune system [85] where it participates in the regulation of immune responses and in mediating the anti-inflammatory effects of C. sativa [86]. However, CB₂ shows a moderate expression in other peripheral tissues, including the cardiovascular system, gastrointestinal tract, liver, adipose tissue, bone, and reproductive system. More recently a functional CB₂, expressed in neurons of the hippocampus, has been identified [87]. CB₂ is encoded by the gene CNR2 and consists of 360 amino acids in humans. Two isoforms of the CB₂ have been identified in humans: hCB₂A and hCB₂B. Strikingly, these two isoforms show a tissue-specific expression: hCB₂A is mainly expressed in the testis, more than 100-fold than in spleen and leukocytes, whereas the other hCB₂B is expressed predominantly in spleen and at lower level in other peripheral tissues except the testis [88]. The expression of the testis-specific isoform might indicate that hCB₂A could regulate functions related to spermatogenesis and fertilization. However, detailed information on the expression and role of hCB₂A in human testis to date are unknown. Agirregoitia et al. reported the expression of CB₂ in human sperm and suggested that, along with CB₁, it could be also involved in sperm motility regulation [89]. However, various evidence indicates that CB₂ is expressed at a higher level in germ cells at early stage of differentiation in mice, rats, and humans [12,51,53]. It is already expressed by gonocytes in fetal mouse testis starting from E11.5 and its expression increases during embryo development reaching a very high level in spermatogonia at birth [12]. In postnatal mouse testis, CB₂ continues to be expressed by spermatogonia and its expression dramatically decreases in spermatocytes, reaching a very low level in spermatids and disappearing in mouse spermatozoa. Interestingly, spermatogonia possess also the higher level of the endocannabinoid 2-AG, which decreases in spermatocytes (~2-fold) and in spermatids (~20-fold; see Figure 1). Accordingly, spermatogonia express higher and lower levels of 2-AG biosynthetic and degrading enzymes, respectively, as compared to meiotic and postmeiotic cells. Altogether these observations indicate the involvement of an autocrine/paracrine endocannabinoid signaling mediated by CB₂ receptor and sustained by 2-AG, which may regulate several functions in mitotic male germ cells. In this context, it has been demonstrated that activation of CB₂, through the use of the selective agonist JWH-133, promoted in vitro meiotic entry of mouse spermatogonia [12] while it did not affect mitotic germ cell proliferation (P.G., unpublished observation). Morphological and molecular evidence supported these conclusions, since CB₂ activation in spermatogonia increased: (a) the number of SYCP3 positive cells, corresponding to early meiotic prophase stages, (b) the expression of early meiotic genes, and (c) the expression of the meiosis-specific histone H3K4me3 methyltransferase Prdm9. PRDM9 trimethylates specific H3K4 sites, at meiotic entry, specifying the recombination hotspots, essential for progression through prophase I [30]. Accordingly CB₂ activation in spermatogonia increases the global level H3K4me3 and induced histone modifications at promoter regions of meiotic and premeiotic genes c-Kit and Stra8, compatible with their transcriptional activation. All these events occur physiologically during spermatogenesis when B-type spermatogonia enter meiosis and reach the leptotene stage of prophase I, suggesting that CB₂ could play a physiological pro–meiotic role in spermatogenesis, controlling the timely coordinated progression of spermatogenesis. Notably, chronic administration of JWH-133 to immature male mice induces an acceleration of the onset of spermatogenesis, whereas the specific CB₂ antagonist delays germ cell differentiation, thus demonstrating that both hyper- and hypo-stimulation of CB₂ disrupted the temporal dynamics of the spermatogenic cycles [13]. These findings highlight the importance of proper CB₂ signaling in the testis for the maintenance of a correct temporal progression of spermatogenesis. Disruption of the temporal dynamics of the spermatogenic cycle has important clinical implications because it frequently leads to reduced fertility or infertility due to increased germ cell apoptosis [90]. Regarding CB₂, very recently, we have demonstrated that the hyperactivation of this cannabinoid receptor in male mice, besides promoting germ cell differentiation, reduced sperm number recovered by cauda epididymis [55]. This apparent discrepancy could be explained by a loss of the accelerated germ cells caused by apoptosis. Accordingly, a similar effect has been demonstrated in fetal oocyte at meiotic entry. In females, activation of CB₂ signaling in fetal oocytes exerts a pro-meiotic effect in vitro and causes, in vivo, an increase in apoptotic cell death that leads to reduced ovarian reserve at birth [62].

5.3. Role of Cannabinoid Receptors in Epigenetic Modifications during Male Germ Cell Development

Recent evidence in humans and animal models reported that activation of cannabinoid receptors, through the exposure to cannabinoids, is associated with epigenetic modifications [91]. Indeed, in vitro and in vivo experiments have reported that cannabinoid treatment induces alterations in DNA methylation and histone modifications in several cell types. In human keratinocytes, it has been demonstrated that cannabinoids regulate the expression of skin differentiation genes through DNA methylation [92,93], while Rotter et al. reported that CB₁ expression is regulated by DNA methylation in peripheral blood cells in subjects with THC dependence [94]. Along the same line, another study addressed THC-induced epigenetic changes in immune cells showing histone modifications in some genes of lymph node cells in mice [95]. Regarding the CNS, it is known that the brain is particularly vulnerable to cannabinoid exposure, which can lead to adverse effects resulting in mental health disorders. In a study in which the molecular basis for this brain vulnerability was investigated, the authors identified histone modifications in three rat brain areas (hippocampus, nucleus accumbens, and amygdala), after adolescent and adult chronic THC exposure [96]. Similarly, Tomasiewicz et al. reported an increased Penk gene expression in response to rat adolescent THC exposure associated to changes in histone methylation [97].

The effect of cannabinoids on epigenetics has been also investigated during prenatal exposure in the developing fetus, via maternal exposure during pregnancy. A study on the immune system in mice showed that in utero exposure to THC resulted in markedly defective T cell differentiation and impaired T cell function in offspring. This immunosuppressive effect has been correlated to epigenetic mechanisms such as altered microRNA, DNA methylation, and histone modification profiles [98]. In another study, maternal cannabis use has been reported to alter the developmental regulation of mesolimbic dopamine D2 receptors in offspring through histone lysine methylation [99]. A summary of studies reporting associations between post-natal (A)/prenatal (B) exposure to cannabinoids and epigenetic alterations is shown in Table 1.

Table 1Epigenetic changes associated to cannabinoids exposure.

1.A. Epigenetic Changes that Occur within the Lifespan Due to Direct Cannabinoids Exposure.
Drug	Biological Target	Epigenetic Marks	Associated Effects	Reference
THC	Peripheral blood cells (human)	CB₁ and CB₂ promoter methylation	Decreased CB1 expression in blood cells	[94]
THC	Immune cells (mouse)	Histone modifications: - H3K4me3 - H3K9me3; - H3K27me3; - H3K36me3; - H3K9ac	Pleiotropic effect on gene expression in immune cells	[95]
THC	- Hippocampus - Nucleus accumbens - Amygdala (rat)	Histone modifications: - H3K9me2,3 - H3K27me3 - H3K9ac - H3K14ac	Vulnerability to psychiatric disorders	[100]
THC	Adult brain (rat)	Histone modifications (H3K4me3; H3K9me3)	Increased Penk gene mRNA levels	[97]
THC	Mouse myeloid-derived suppressor cells	miRNAs	Altered miRNA involved in myeloid expansion and differentiation	[101]
THC	Intestine (macaque)	miRNAs	Induction of anti-inflammatory microRNA expression	[102]
WIN55,212-2	Adult mouse brain (hippocampus)	DNA methylation	Decreased expression of Rgs7; memory impairment	[103]
1.B. Epigenetic changes that occur during fetal life due to direct in utero cannabinoids exposure.
Drug	Biological Target	Epigenetic Modification	Associated Effects	Reference
THC	Adult nucleus accumbens (rat)	Histone modification (H3K4me3; H3K9me2)	Decreased Drd2 gene expression level	[99]
THC	Human trophoblast cell line (BeWo)	Increased HDAC3 expression	Gene dysregulation during placental development	[104]

Differently from the somatic cell types, epigenetic modifications in the germline are especially important because they can be transmitted to the progeny. Although compelling evidence is now showing that father exposure to cannabis can induce heritable changes in the sperm epigenome, very few studies have up to now addressed this point. In in vitro experiments on isolated mouse male germ cells, we reported alteration of H3K4me3 and H3K9me2 levels at the promoters of c-Kit, Stra8 and Gfra1 genes in mouse spermatogonia treated with the CB₂ agonist JWH-133 [13], underlining the susceptibility of these cells to epigenetic modifications. A very interesting study of Murphy et al. showed that cannabis use in humans, and THC exposure in rats, is associated with widespread changes in sperm DNA methylation [54]. From this study, they identified hypomethylation in autism candidate gene DLGAP2 in the sperm of human and rat exposed to C. sativa. Moreover, they found the same hypomethylated state in this gene in the nucleus accumbens of rats born from THC-exposed fathers [105], strongly supporting the potential for intergenerational inheritance of altered sperm DNA methylation patterns. Some other studies are beginning to shed light on cannabis/cannabinoid-induced epigenetic modifications paternally transmitted. Szutorisz et al. reported that THC exposure of male and female adolescent rats resulted in behavioral and neurobiological abnormalities in the subsequent F1 generation as a consequence of parental germline exposure to the drug [106] and, in a different report, they showed that these defects were associated to altered gene expression in the nucleus accumbens due to modified DNA methylation [107]. Levin et al. reported that paternal THC exposure in rats induced DNA methylation alterations in sperm and this correlated to impairment in attentional performance in the offspring [108], while, another study showed that male exposure to cannabinoids during adolescence induced stress vulnerability in the offspring and this effect was associated to increased global DNA methylation in the offspring prefrontal cortex [109]. All these studies reveal that paternal exposure to cannabis and cannabinoids is associated with various behavioural and neurobiological abnormalities in the offspring through epigenetic mechanisms transmitted by sperm cells. Very recently, we investigated the effects of paternal selective activation of CB₂ on offspring. We found that chronic exposure of prepubertal male mice to CB₂ agonist JWH-133 induced sperm DNA hypermethylation at paternally expressed imprinted genes Plagl1 and Peg10, important for placental development and offspring growth. The hypermethylation level in these imprinted genes correlated to decreased expression of Tet genes. Interestingly, these specific alterations in sperm epigenome were inherited by the embryonic tissues and caused defects in placental and embryonic growth [55]. Overall, these studies clearly demonstrated that paternal cannabinoid receptors overactivation can induce epigenetic alterations in male gametes that are then transmitted to the next generation with an impact on offspring health as indicated in Figure 2. A summary of studies reporting associations between parental exposure to cannabinoids before conception and epigenetic alterations transmitted to the progeny is shown in Table 2. Altogether these evidence underline the susceptibility of male germ cells to epigenetic modifications following drug exposure and highlight the critical role of sperm as key vector of inheritance.

Figure 2Paternal transmission of cannabinoid-induced epigenetic modifications. Cannabinoid exposure, particularly that during young age, leads to epigenetic alterations in the germline of the father (red circle). The epigenetic aberrations could appear in spermatogonial stem cells (SSC) or in spermatogonia (SPG) and could be maintained during germ cell differentiation in meiotic cells (SPC), haploid cells (SPT) up to sperm. Epigenetic alterations are then transmitted to F1 offspring by sperm with consequences on offspring health.

Table 2Epigenetic changes that occur in parental germline before conception and transmitted to the F1 generation.

Drug	Biological Target	Epigenetic Modification	Associated Effects	Reference
JWH-133	Spermatogonia (mouse, in vitro)	Histone modification (H3K4me3; H3K9me2)	Accelerated entry into meiosis	[13]
THC/Cannabis	Sperm (rat/human)	global DNA methylation	Altered hippo signaling and cancer pathways in sperm	[54]
Cannabis	Sperm (rat/human)	DNA methylation	Hypomethylation in autism DLGAP2 gene in sperm and nucleus accumbens of offspring	[105]
THC	Adult nucleus accumbens (rat)	DNA methylation	Altered methylation in genes associated with neurotransmission and synaptic plasticity genes in F1 offspring	[107]
THC	Sperm (rat)	DNA methylation	Impairment in attentional performance in offspring	[108]
WIN55,212-2	Sperm (rat)	DNA methylation	Increased DNA methylation in offspring prefrontal cortex associated with stress vulnerability	[109]
JWH-133	Sperm (mouse)	DNA methylation	Hypermethylation at imprinted Peg10 and Plagl1 genes in sperm and placenta. Altered placental and embryonic growth	[55]

6. Cannabinoid Receptors and Testicular Tumours

The role of the endocannabinoid system in the pathophysiology of cancer is not completely clear yet. Most studies point out that in humans CB receptors are upregulated in tumours and that their overexpression correlates with cancer [110]. However, the activation of CB receptors in human cells in vitro and in mice models has often an anti-tumorigenic effect, acting on cancer cell proliferation, migration, apoptosis, and tumor vascularization. The mechanisms are complex and can differ between cancer types. In addition, a selected number of tumours might be targeted by the inactivation instead of stimulation of cannabinoid receptors. This highlights the complexity of the endocannabinoid system and the need for a careful molecular characterization of the tumours and patients stratification before agonists or antagonists of cannabinoid receptors might be employed, alongside with standard treatments, to enhance therapy efficacy.

Testicular tumors are the most frequent solid tumors of adolescents and young adult males. Indeed they can appear at any age with three apparent subtypes of distinct molecular etiology: prepubertal testicular tumors, present in boys younger than 12 years of age, post-pubertal testicular tumors comprising the adult testicular tumors present in young men between 15 and 40 years of age, and spermatocytic tumours that generally are present in men older than 50 years of age [111]. By far, the most prevalent subtype is postpubertal adult testicular tumors, with a lifetime risk of about 0.5–1%, that in some countries have increased up to three-fold in the last five decades [112,113,114,115]. In 2016, the WHO classification of testicular tumors was revised, considering advances in the understanding of their tumorigenesis and molecular features. These changes led to a division into two major groups: prepubertal-type tumors, not derived from germ cell neoplasia in situ (GCNIS), and postpubertal-type tumors, GCNIS-derived [116]. The GCNIS-derived tumors are much more common and typically occur in postpubertal men from 18 to 45 years of age. The histotypes include seminoma, embryonal carcinoma, yolk sac tumor, trophoblastic tumors, teratoma, mixed germ cell tumor, and regressed germ cell tumor. The prepubertal-type germ cell tumors, the other major category of testicular tumors not derived from GCNIS, occur mostly but not exclusively in children. Spermatocytic seminoma has been designated as a spermatocytic tumor and placed within the group of non–GCNIS-related tumors. Postpubertal testicular tumors are believed to originate from a common precursor, the GCNIS cell [116,117]. GCNIS cells stay quiescent during infancy, followed by proliferation in puberty, probably due to hormonal stimulation, with subsequent progression into overt tumors. An essential feature of GCNIS is its location at the base of seminiferous tubules, in the “spermatogonial niche” and the expression of markers such as OCT3/4, placental alkaline phosphatase, and AP-2ɣ. The biological causes of the initial malignant transformation from a precursor cell to a GCNIS cell are still unclear. The initial transformation most likely takes place in utero during the early development of the germline and the target cells are most likely the embryonic germ cells, either PGCs or gonocytes [118,119,120,121].

The incidence of testicular cancer varies by ethnic origin, with the highest rates reported in developed countries and lowest in developing countries. Several risk factors have been identified for testicular tumors. Beyond age, race, and family history of the disorder, a strong risk factor is cryptorchidism (undescended testis) [122]. Other factors include infertility [123] and genetic conditions such as Down’s syndrome [124], or XY gonadal dysgenesis [125], suggesting that alterations of germ cell development, inherited factors, or congenital genetic changes play a role in the pathogenesis of testicular tumors. Although the activation of CB receptors has been associated with an anti-cancer effect in a variety of human cells and mice models, recently, marijuana use has also been evaluated as a risk factor for testicular cancer development by increasing the incidence of testicular tumors [126,127,128,129,130,131]. Interestingly, the reported association of C. sativa exposure and increased incidence of testicular tumors concerns exclusively non-seminomas. However, the molecular mechanisms behind this association are currently unknown. It is thus likely that active compounds in phytocannabinoids, by binding to cannabinoid receptors at a central level, could target the hypothalamic–testis axis, thus disrupting normal hormone regulation of spermatogenesis and leading to carcinogenesis. Moreover, cannabinoids could bind, at the periphery in the testis, to CB receptors expressed in germ cells or somatic cells, altering germ cell development and firing the cancerous transformation.

Furthermore, the lack of GCNIS or seminoma-like tumors in rodents (and in particular of mice models) impairs the performance of molecular studies which might help a better understanding of these human diseases. Further studies are warranted in the years to come, to furthermore elucidate the mechanism.

Although a large body of literature has explored the role of CB receptors in a variety of tumors, only recently, a single study described a pro-apoptotic effect of the cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN 55,212-2 on a testicular cancer cell line [132].

With the goal of characterizing CB receptors expression and their potential role in testicular tumours, we describe below our preliminary unpublished findings on the embryonal carcinoma cell line NTERA-2 cL.D1 (Nt2d1) [133], a pluripotent testicular tumour cell line that is extremely sensitive to cisplatin treatment due to its low proficiency in the repair of cisplatin-induced damage [133] and to P53-mediated apoptosis (see [134] and references therein). By Western blotting analysis, we found that Nt2d1cells expressed CB₂ but not CB₁ receptors (Figure 3A). To test whether CB₂ receptor was functional, we treated Nt2d1 cells with the CB₂-selective agonist JWH-133, using a dose that we observed to be biologically active in germ cells [12]. We observed that CB₂ receptor activation induced transient ERK1/ERK2 phosphorylation (Figure 3B) and cell death by apoptosis, as demonstrated by the presence of a peak in the sub-G1 stage by analysis of the cell cycle profiles (FACS; Figure 3C). Moreover, the analyses of cell proliferation, measured by evaluating the incorporation of the thymidine-analog bromodeoxyuridine/5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine (BrdU), revealed that chronic treatment with JWH-133 caused a strong reduction of BrdU incorporation (Figure 3D), indicating an arrest of the cell cycle at G1/S transition. In some cellular contexts, prolonged treatment with CB₂ agonists can increase the expression of the receptor, leading to an increased proficiency in downstream signaling activation [110]. To understand whether this molecular mechanism could account for the anti-proliferative effect of JWH-133 in Nt2d1 cells, we analyzed CB₂ protein level at different time points after stimulation with JWH-133. As shown in Figure 3E and quantified in Figure 3F, CB₂ expression was significantly up-regulated, suggesting that the response of Nt2d1 cells to the drug is correlated to the sustained expression of CB₂ level and signaling. Overall our results indicate that CB₂ activation might have a therapeutic potential for the treatment of testicular tumours. Further studies will be required to reveal the effect of CB₂ activation in cisplatin-resistant cells in vitro and in vivo, alone or in combination with other therapeutic drugs [135].

Figure 3Cannabinoid receptor CB₂ in embryonal carcinoma. (A) Expression of CB₁ and CB₂ receptors in Nt2d1 cell line. Mouse brain and spleen were used as positive controls for the expression of CB₁ and CB₂, respectively. (B) Analysis of the activation of ERK pathway following the stimulation with 1 µM JWH-133 at the indicated time points. In (A) and (B), tubulin was used as loading control. (C) Cell cycle profile of Nt2d1 cells in untreated and JWH-133 treated cells (1 µM), at the indicated time point. The sub-G1 pick is indicative of nuclear fragmentation. (D) Chronic exposure of Nt2d1 cells at 1 µM JWH-133 causes an arrest at the G1/S phase of the cell cycle. (E) Expression of CB₂ receptor following chronic exposure of Nt2d1 cells at 1 µM JWH-133 for the indicated time frames. The expression of glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used as loading control. (F) Densitometric analysis of CB₂ expression treatment of Nt2d1 cells with 1 µM JWH-133 for 72hs. CB₂ expression was normalized against the loading control (GAPDH). Data are mean value ± s.d. of three independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using a unpaired two-tail Student’s t-test (p < 0.05; Barchi and Grimaldi, unpublished data).

7. Concluding Remarks

The cannabinoid receptors are expressed in male germ cells at any stage of their differentiation and their downstream signaling is involved in the physiological progression of germ cell development and in sperm functions. The presence of a complete and active ECS in these cells suggests that they are also sensitive to exogenous cannabinoids. Marijuana, or C. sativa is the most widely used illicit drug and its use is strongly increasing in the last years, potentially as a result of the widespread legalization for both medical and recreational use. It is also the drug most commonly used by young people at reproductive age. The fact that C. sativa exerts its biological effect through activation of cannabinoid receptors prompt a strong need to understand the impact of cannabinoid exposure on germ cells. More recently, the interest is increased following the identification of epigenetic implications of cannabis exposure in germ cells. Indeed these cells are unique in their ability to transfer genetic/epigenetic information from generation to generation. As such, the integrity of their genome and epigenome are paramount to the health of organisms of the next generation. On this basis, recent findings have begun to highlight that fathering cannabinoid exposure induced alterations in the sperm epigenome and these alterations were associated with increased defects in the offspring, including behavioural and neurobiological abnormalities and reduced growth at birth and fetal life. Moreover, considering that testicular tumours are believed to arise from failure of normal maturation of gonocytes, the risk of a potential predisposition in the offspring to TGCT or to metabolic and chronic diseases in adulthood should be considered in future studies.

Acknowledgments

We thank Francesca Cavallo (Memorial Sloan–Kettering Cancer Center) for her contribution to the early stages of the experimental study on testicular tumours.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.G. and M.B.; methodology, E.I. and T.G.; data curation, E.I., T.G., M.B. and P.G.; writing—original draft preparation, P.G., S.D., P.R., M.B.; writing—review and editing, P.G., P.R., M.B.; supervision, P.G.; project administration, P.G. and M.B.; funding acquisition, M.B., P.R. and P.G.

Funding

This work was supported by the Mission Sustainability grants [ID 141 to M.B. P.R. and P.G.].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

Untitled section

References

1.Jan S.Z., Hamer G., Repping S., de Rooij D.G., van Pelt A.M., Vormer T.L. Molecular control of rodent spermatogenesis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2012;1822:1838–1850. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2012.02.008.
2.Grimaldi P., Di Giacomo D., Geremia R. The endocannabinoid system and spermatogenesis. Front. Endocrinol. 2013;4:192. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2013.00192.
3.De Felici M., Scaldaferri M.L., Lobascio M., Iona S., Nazzicone V., Klinger F.G., Farini D. Experimental approaches to the study of primordial germ cell lineage and proliferation. Hum. Reprod. Updat. 2004;10:197–206. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmh020.
4.De Rooij D.G. Proliferation and differentiation of spermatogonial stem cells. Reproduction. 2001;121:347–354. doi: 10.1530/rep.0.1210347.
5.Dolci S., Pellegrini M., Di Agostino S., Geremia R., Rossi P. Signaling through extracellular signal-regulated kinase is required for spermatogonial proliferative response to stem cell factor. J. Biol. Chem. 2001;276:40225–40233. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M105143200.
6.Rossi P., Albanesi C., Grimaldi P., Geremia R. Expression of the mRNA for the ligand of c-kit in mouse Sertoli cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1991;176:910–914. doi: 10.1016/S0006-291X(05)80272-4.
7.Meng X., Lindahl M., Hyvonen M.E., Parvinen M., de Rooij D.G., Hess M.W., Raatikainen-Ahokas A., Sainio K., Rauvala H., Lakso M., et al. Regulation of cell fate decision of undifferentiated spermatogonia by GDNF. Science. 2000;287:1489–1493. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5457.1489.
8.Pellegrini M., Grimaldi P., Rossi P., Geremia R., Dolci S. Developmental expression of BMP4/ALK3/SMAD5 signaling pathway in the mouse testis: A potential role of BMP4 in spermatogonia differentiation. J. Cell Sci. 2003;116:3363–3372. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00650.
9.Anderson E.L., Baltus A.E., Roepers-Gajadien H.L., Hassold T.J., de Rooij D.G., van Pelt A.M., Page D.C. Stra8 and its inducer, retinoic acid, regulate meiotic initiation in both spermatogenesis and oogenesis in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2008;105:14976–14980. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0807297105.
10.Pellegrini M., Filipponi D., Gori M., Barrios F., Lolicato F., Grimaldi P., Rossi P., Jannini E.A., Geremia R., Dolci S. ATRA and KL promote differentiation toward the meiotic program of male germ cells. Cell Cycle. 2008;7:3878–3888. doi: 10.4161/cc.7.24.7262.
11.Zhou Q., Li Y., Nie R., Friel P., Mitchell D., Evanoff R.M., Pouchnik D., Banasik B., McCarrey J.R., Small C., et al. Expression of stimulated by retinoic acid gene 8 (Stra8) and maturation of murine gonocytes and spermatogonia induced by retinoic acid in vitro. Biol. Reprod. 2008;78:537–545. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.107.064337.
12.Grimaldi P., Orlando P., Di Siena S., Lolicato F., Petrosino S., Bisogno T., Geremia R., De Petrocellis L., Di Marzo V. The endocannabinoid system and pivotal role of the CB2 receptor in mouse spermatogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:11131–11136. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812789106.
13.Di Giacomo D., De Domenico E., Sette C., Geremia R., Grimaldi P. Type 2 cannabinoid receptor contributes to the physiological regulation of spermatogenesis. FASEB J. 2016;30:1453–1463. doi: 10.1096/fj.15-279034.
14.Baudat F., Keeney S. Meiotic recombination: Making and breaking go hand in hand. Curr. Biol. CB. 2001;11:R45–R48. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00013-6.
15.Romanienko P.J., Camerini-Otero R.D. The mouse Spo11 gene is required for meiotic chromosome synapsis. Mol. Cell. 2000;6:975–987. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)00097-6.
16.La Volpe A., Barchi M. Meiotic double strand breaks repair in sexually reproducing eukaryotes: We are not all equal. Exp. Cell Res. 2012;318:1333–1339. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2012.03.014.
17.McLachlan R.I., O’Donnell L., Meachem S.J., Stanton P.G., de Kretser D.M., Pratis K., Robertson D.M. Identification of specific sites of hormonal regulation in spermatogenesis in rats, monkeys, and man. Recent Progress Horm. Res. 2002;57:149–179. doi: 10.1210/rp.57.1.149.
18.Sasaki H., Matsui Y. Epigenetic events in mammalian germ-cell development: Reprogramming and beyond. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2008;9:129–140. doi: 10.1038/nrg2295.
19.Chen T., Li E. Structure and function of eukaryotic DNA methyltransferases. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 2004;60:55–89. doi: 10.1016/S0070-2153(04)60003-2.
20.Wu H., Zhang Y. Reversing DNA methylation: Mechanisms, genomics, and biological functions. Cell. 2014;156:45–68. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.12.019.
21.Hajkova P., Ancelin K., Waldmann T., Lacoste N., Lange U.C., Cesari F., Lee C., Almouzni G., Schneider R., Surani M.A. Chromatin dynamics during epigenetic reprogramming in the mouse germ line. Nature. 2008;452:877–881. doi: 10.1038/nature06714.
22.Reik W., Dean W., Walter J. Epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development. Science. 2001;293:1089–1093. doi: 10.1126/science.1063443.
23.Seki Y., Hayashi K., Itoh K., Mizugaki M., Saitou M., Matsui Y. Extensive and orderly reprogramming of genome-wide chromatin modifications associated with specification and early development of germ cells in mice. Dev. Biol. 2005;278:440–458. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.11.025.
24.Seisenberger S., Andrews S., Krueger F., Arand J., Walter J., Santos F., Popp C., Thienpont B., Dean W., Reik W. The dynamics of genome-wide DNA methylation reprogramming in mouse primordial germ cells. Mol. Cell. 2012;48:849–862. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.11.001.
25.Kobayashi H., Sakurai T., Miura F., Imai M., Mochiduki K., Yanagisawa E., Sakashita A., Wakai T., Suzuki Y., Ito T., et al. High-resolution DNA methylome analysis of primordial germ cells identifies gender-specific reprogramming in mice. Genome Res. 2013;23:616–627. doi: 10.1101/gr.148023.112.
26.Mochizuki K., Matsui Y. Epigenetic profiles in primordial germ cells: Global modulation and fine tuning of the epigenome for acquisition of totipotency. Dev. Growth Differ. 2010;52:517–525. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-169X.2010.01190.x.
27.Kato Y., Kaneda M., Hata K., Kumaki K., Hisano M., Kohara Y., Okano M., Li E., Nozaki M., Sasaki H. Role of the Dnmt3 family in de novo methylation of imprinted and repetitive sequences during male germ cell development in the mouse. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2007;16:2272–2280. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddm179.
28.Payne C., Braun R.E. Histone lysine trimethylation exhibits a distinct perinuclear distribution in Plzf-expressing spermatogonia. Dev. Biol. 2006;293:461–472. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.02.013.
29.Peters A.H., O’Carroll D., Scherthan H., Mechtler K., Sauer S., Schofer C., Weipoltshammer K., Pagani M., Lachner M., Kohlmaier A., et al. Loss of the Suv39h histone methyltransferases impairs mammalian heterochromatin and genome stability. Cell. 2001;107:323–337. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00542-6.
30.Powers N.R., Parvanov E.D., Baker C.L., Walker M., Petkov P.M., Paigen K. The Meiotic Recombination Activator PRDM9 Trimethylates Both H3K36 and H3K4 at Recombination Hotspots In Vivo. PLoS Genet. 2016;12:e1006146. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006146.
31.Parvanov E.D., Petkov P.M., Paigen K. Prdm9 controls activation of mammalian recombination hotspots. Science. 2010;327:835. doi: 10.1126/science.1181495.
32.Parvanov E.D., Tian H., Billings T., Saxl R.L., Spruce C., Aithal R., Krejci L., Paigen K., Petkov P.M. PRDM9 interactions with other proteins provide a link between recombination hotspots and the chromosomal axis in meiosis. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2017;28:488–499. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e16-09-0686.
33.Morgan H.D., Santos F., Green K., Dean W., Reik W. Epigenetic reprogramming in mammals. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2005;14:R47–R58. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddi114.
34.Cho C., Jung-Ha H., Willis W.D., Goulding E.H., Stein P., Xu Z., Schultz R.M., Hecht N.B., Eddy E.M. Protamine 2 deficiency leads to sperm DNA damage and embryo death in mice. Biol. Reprod. 2003;69:211–217. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.102.015115.
35.Cacciola G., Chioccarelli T., Ricci G., Meccariello R., Fasano S., Pierantoni R., Cobellis G. The endocannabinoid system in vertebrate male reproduction: A comparative overview. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2008;286(Suppl. 1):S24–S30. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2008.01.004.
36.Meccariello R., Battista N., Bradshaw H.B., Wang H. Updates in reproduction coming from the endocannabinoid system. Int. J. Endocrinol. 2014;2014:412354. doi: 10.1155/2014/412354.
37.Devane W.A., Hanus L., Breuer A., Pertwee R.G., Stevenson L.A., Griffin G., Gibson D., Mandelbaum A., Etinger A., Mechoulam R. Isolation and structure of a brain constituent that binds to the cannabinoid receptor. Science. 1992;258:1946–1949. doi: 10.1126/science.1470919.
38.Sugiura T., Kobayashi Y., Oka S., Waku K. Biosynthesis and degradation of anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol and their possible physiological significance. Prostaglandins leukot. Essent. Fat. Acids. 2002;66:173–192. doi: 10.1054/plef.2001.0356.
39.Mechoulam R., Ben-Shabat S., Hanus L., Ligumsky M., Kaminski N.E., Schatz A.R., Gopher A., Almog S., Martin B.R., Compton D.R., et al. Identification of an endogenous 2-monoglyceride, present in canine gut, that binds to cannabinoid receptors. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1995;50:83–90. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(95)00109-D.
40.Okamoto Y., Morishita J., Tsuboi K., Tonai T., Ueda N. Molecular characterization of a phospholipase D generating anandamide and its congeners. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:5298–5305. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M306642200.
41.Bisogno T., Howell F., Williams G., Minassi A., Cascio M.G., Ligresti A., Matias I., Schiano-Moriello A., Paul P., Williams E.J., et al. Cloning of the first sn1-DAG lipases points to the spatial and temporal regulation of endocannabinoid signaling in the brain. J. Cell Biol. 2003;163:463–468. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200305129.
42.McKinney M.K., Cravatt B.F. Structure and function of fatty acid amide hydrolase. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2005;74:411–432. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.74.082803.133450.
43.Dinh T.P., Carpenter D., Leslie F.M., Freund T.F., Katona I., Sensi S.L., Kathuria S., Piomelli D. Brain monoglyceride lipase participating in endocannabinoid inactivation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2002;99:10819–10824. doi: 10.1073/pnas.152334899.
44.Sugiura T., Waku K. Cannabinoid receptors and their endogenous ligands. J. Biochem. 2002;132:7–12. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a003200.
45.Di Marzo V., De Petrocellis L. Endocannabinoids as regulators of transient receptor potential (TRP) channels: A further opportunity to develop new endocannabinoid-based therapeutic drugs. Curr. Med. Chem. 2010;17:1430–1449. doi: 10.2174/092986710790980078.
46.Bovolin P., Cottone E., Pomatto V., Fasano S., Pierantoni R., Cobellis G., Meccariello R. Endocannabinoids are Involved in Male Vertebrate Reproduction: Regulatory Mechanisms at Central and Gonadal Level. Front. Endocrinol. 2014;5:54. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2014.00054.
47.Cacciola G., Chioccarelli T., Mackie K., Meccariello R., Ledent C., Fasano S., Pierantoni R., Cobellis G. Expression of type-1 cannabinoid receptor during rat postnatal testicular development: Possible involvement in adult leydig cell differentiation. Biol. Reprod. 2008;79:758–765. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.108.070128.
48.Ricci G., Cacciola G., Altucci L., Meccariello R., Pierantoni R., Fasano S., Cobellis G. Endocannabinoid control of sperm motility: The role of epididymus. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2007;153:320–322. doi: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2007.02.003.
49.Amoako A.A., Marczylo T.H., Marczylo E.L., Elson J., Willets J.M., Taylor A.H., Konje J.C. Anandamide modulates human sperm motility: Implications for men with asthenozoospermia and oligoasthenoteratozoospermia. Hum. Reprod. 2013;28:2058–2066. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det232.
50.Lewis S.E., Rapino C., Di Tommaso M., Pucci M., Battista N., Paro R., Simon L., Lutton D., Maccarrone M. Differences in the endocannabinoid system of sperm from fertile and infertile men. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e47704. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047704.
51.Migliaccio M., Ricci G., Suglia A., Manfrevola F., Mackie K., Fasano S., Pierantoni R., Chioccarelli T., Cobellis G. Analysis of Endocannabinoid System in Rat Testis During the First Spermatogenetic Wave. Front. Endocrinol. 2018;9:269. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2018.00269.
52.Maccarrone M., Cecconi S., Rossi G., Battista N., Pauselli R., Finazzi-Agro A. Anandamide activity and degradation are regulated by early postnatal aging and follicle-stimulating hormone in mouse Sertoli cells. Endocrinology. 2003;144:20–28. doi: 10.1210/en.2002-220544.
53.Nielsen J.E., Rolland A.D., Rajpert-De Meyts E., Janfelt C., Jorgensen A., Winge S.B., Kristensen D.M., Juul A., Chalmel F., Jegou B., et al. Characterisation and localisation of the endocannabinoid system components in the adult human testis. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:12866. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49177-y.
54.Murphy S.K., Itchon-Ramos N., Visco Z., Huang Z., Grenier C., Schrott R., Acharya K., Boudreau M.H., Price T.M., Raburn D.J., et al. Cannabinoid exposure and altered DNA methylation in rat and human sperm. Epigenetics. 2018;13:1208–1221. doi: 10.1080/15592294.2018.1554521.
55.Innocenzi E., De Domenico E., Ciccarone F., Zampieri M., Rossi G., Cicconi R., Bernardini R., Mattei M., Grimaldi P. Paternal activation of CB2 cannabinoid receptor impairs placental and embryonic growth via an epigenetic mechanism. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:17034. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-53579-3.
56.Di Marzo V., Stella N., Zimmer A. Endocannabinoid signalling and the deteriorating brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2015;16:30–42. doi: 10.1038/nrn3876.
57.Maccarrone M., Bab I., Biro T., Cabral G.A., Dey S.K., Di Marzo V., Konje J.C., Kunos G., Mechoulam R., Pacher P., et al. Endocannabinoid signaling at the periphery: 50 Years after THC. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2015;36:277–296. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2015.02.008.
58.DiPatrizio N.V., Piomelli D. Intestinal lipid-derived signals that sense dietary fat. J. Clin. Investig. 2015;125:891–898. doi: 10.1172/JCI76302.
59.Ruehle S., Wager-Miller J., Straiker A., Farnsworth J., Murphy M.N., Loch S., Monory K., Mackie K., Lutz B. Discovery and characterization of two novel CB1 receptor splice variants with modified N-termini in mouse. J. Neurochem. 2017;142:521–533. doi: 10.1111/jnc.14099.
60.Ryberg E., Vu H.K., Larsson N., Groblewski T., Hjorth S., Elebring T., Sjogren S., Greasley P.J. Identification and characterisation of a novel splice variant of the human CB1 receptor. FEBS Lett. 2005;579:259–264. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.11.085.
61.Cobellis G., Meccariello R., Chianese R., Chioccarelli T., Fasano S., Pierantoni R. Effects of Neuroendocrine CB1 Activity on Adult Leydig Cells. Front. Endocrinol. 2016;7:47. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2016.00047.
62.De Domenico E., Todaro F., Rossi G., Dolci S., Geremia R., Rossi P., Grimaldi P. Overactive type 2 cannabinoid receptor induces meiosis in fetal gonads and impairs ovarian reserve. Cell Death Dis. 2017;8:e3085. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2017.496.
63.Chioccarelli T., Cacciola G., Altucci L., Lewis S.E., Simon L., Ricci G., Ledent C., Meccariello R., Fasano S., Pierantoni R., et al. Cannabinoid receptor 1 influences chromatin remodeling in mouse spermatids by affecting content of transition protein 2 mRNA and histone displacement. Endocrinology. 2010;151:5017–5029. doi: 10.1210/en.2010-0133.
64.Cobellis G., Cacciola G., Scarpa D., Meccariello R., Chianese R., Franzoni M.F., Mackie K., Pierantoni R., Fasano S. Endocannabinoid system in frog and rodent testis: Type-1 cannabinoid receptor and fatty acid amide hydrolase activity in male germ cells. Biol. Reprod. 2006;75:82–89. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.106.051730.
65.Cobellis G., Ricci G., Cacciola G., Orlando P., Petrosino S., Cascio M.G., Bisogno T., De Petrocellis L., Chioccarelli T., Altucci L., et al. A gradient of 2-arachidonoylglycerol regulates mouse epididymal sperm cell start-up. Biol. Reprod. 2010;82:451–458. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.109.079210.
66.Rossato M., Ion Popa F., Ferigo M., Clari G., Foresta C. Human sperm express cannabinoid receptor Cb1, the activation of which inhibits motility, acrosome reaction, and mitochondrial function. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2005;90:984–991. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-1287.
67.Aquila S., Guido C., Santoro A., Gazzerro P., Laezza C., Baffa M.F., Ando S., Bifulco M. Rimonabant (SR141716) induces metabolism and acquisition of fertilizing ability in human sperm. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2010;159:831–841. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00570.x.
68.Barbonetti A., Vassallo M.R., Fortunato D., Francavilla S., Maccarrone M., Francavilla F. Energetic metabolism and human sperm motility: Impact of CB (1) receptor activation. Endocrinology. 2010;151:5882–5892. doi: 10.1210/en.2010-0484.
69.Badawy Z.S., Chohan K.R., Whyte D.A., Penefsky H.S., Brown O.M., Souid A.K. Cannabinoids inhibit the respiration of human sperm. Fertil. Steril. 2009;91:2471–2476. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.03.075.
70.Thibault K., Carrel D., Bonnard D., Gallatz K., Simon A., Biard M., Pezet S., Palkovits M., Lenkei Z. Activation-dependent subcellular distribution patterns of CB1 cannabinoid receptors in the rat forebrain. Cereb. Cortex. 2013;23:2581–2591. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs240.
71.Benard G., Massa F., Puente N., Lourenco J., Bellocchio L., Soria-Gomez E., Matias I., Delamarre A., Metna-Laurent M., Cannich A., et al. Mitochondrial CB (1) receptors regulate neuronal energy metabolism. Nat. Neurosci. 2012;15:558–564. doi: 10.1038/nn.3053.
72.Hebert-Chatelain E., Desprez T., Serrat R., Bellocchio L., Soria-Gomez E., Busquets-Garcia A., Pagano Zottola A.C., Delamarre A., Cannich A., Vincent P., et al. A cannabinoid link between mitochondria and memory. Nature. 2016;539:555–559. doi: 10.1038/nature20127.
73.Mendizabal-Zubiaga J., Melser S., Benard G., Ramos A., Reguero L., Arrabal S., Elezgarai I., Gerrikagoitia I., Suarez J., Rodriguez De Fonseca F., et al. Cannabinoid CB1 Receptors Are Localized in Striated Muscle Mitochondria and Regulate Mitochondrial Respiration. Front. Physiol. 2016;7:476. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00476.
74.Melser S., Pagano Zottola A.C., Serrat R., Puente N., Grandes P., Marsicano G., Hebert-Chatelain E. Functional Analysis of Mitochondrial CB1 Cannabinoid Receptors (mtCB1) in the Brain. Methods Enzymol. 2017;593:143–174. doi: 10.1016/bs.mie.2017.06.023.
75.Muller C., Morales P., Reggio P.H. Cannabinoid Ligands Targeting TRP Channels. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2018;11:487. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2018.00487.
76.Caterina M.J., Schumacher M.A., Tominaga M., Rosen T.A., Levine J.D., Julius D. The capsaicin receptor: A heat-activated ion channel in the pain pathway. Nature. 1997;389:816–824. doi: 10.1038/39807.
77.Gavva N.R. Body-temperature maintenance as the predominant function of the vanilloid receptor TRPV1. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2008;29:550–557. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2008.08.003.
78.De Toni L., Garolla A., Menegazzo M., Magagna S., Di Nisio A., Sabovic I., Rocca M.S., Scattolini V., Filippi A., Foresta C. Heat Sensing Receptor TRPV1 Is a Mediator of Thermotaxis in Human Spermatozoa. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0167622. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167622.
79.Maccarrone M., Barboni B., Paradisi A., Bernabo N., Gasperi V., Pistilli M.G., Fezza F., Lucidi P., Mattioli M. Characterization of the endocannabinoid system in boar spermatozoa and implications for sperm capacitation and acrosome reaction. J. Cell Sci. 2005;118:4393–4404. doi: 10.1242/jcs.02536.
80.Yanagimachi R. Fertility of mammalian spermatozoa: Its development and relativity. Zygote. 1994;2:371–372. doi: 10.1017/S0967199400002240.
81.Francavilla F., Battista N., Barbonetti A., Vassallo M.R., Rapino C., Antonangelo C., Pasquariello N., Catanzaro G., Barboni B., Maccarrone M. Characterization of the endocannabinoid system in human spermatozoa and involvement of transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 receptor in their fertilizing ability. Endocrinology. 2009;150:4692–4700. doi: 10.1210/en.2009-0057.
82.Bernabo N., Pistilli M.G., Mattioli M., Barboni B. Role of TRPV1 channels in boar spermatozoa acquisition of fertilizing ability. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2010;323:224–231. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2010.02.025.
83.Bernabo N., Palestini P., Chiarini M., Maccarrone M., Mattioli M., Barboni B. Endocannabinoid-binding CB1 and TRPV1 receptors as modulators of sperm capacitation. Commun. Integr. Biol. 2012;5:68–70. doi: 10.4161/cib.18118.
84.Mizrak S.C., van Dissel-Emiliani F.M. Transient receptor potential vanilloid receptor-1 confers heat resistance to male germ cells. Fertil. Steril. 2008;90:1290–1293. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.10.081.
85.Munro S., Thomas K.L., Abu-Shaar M. Molecular characterization of a peripheral receptor for cannabinoids. Nature. 1993;365:61–65. doi: 10.1038/365061a0.
86.Buckley N.E., McCoy K.L., Mezey E., Bonner T., Zimmer A., Felder C.C., Glass M., Zimmer A. Immunomodulation by cannabinoids is absent in mice deficient for the cannabinoid CB (2) receptor. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2000;396:141–149. doi: 10.1016/S0014-2999(00)00211-9.
87.Stempel A.V., Stumpf A., Zhang H.Y., Ozdogan T., Pannasch U., Theis A.K., Otte D.M., Wojtalla A., Racz I., Ponomarenko A., et al. Cannabinoid Type 2 Receptors Mediate a Cell Type-Specific Plasticity in the Hippocampus. Neuron. 2016;90:795–809. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.03.034.
88.Liu Q.R., Pan C.H., Hishimoto A., Li C.Y., Xi Z.X., Llorente-Berzal A., Viveros M.P., Ishiguro H., Arinami T., Onaivi E.S., et al. Species differences in cannabinoid receptor 2 (CNR2 gene): Identification of novel human and rodent CB2 isoforms, differential tissue expression and regulation by cannabinoid receptor ligands. Genes Brain Behav. 2009;8:519–530. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2009.00498.x.
89.Agirregoitia E., Carracedo A., Subiran N., Valdivia A., Agirregoitia N., Peralta L., Velasco G., Irazusta J. The CB (2) cannabinoid receptor regulates human sperm cell motility. Fertil. Steril. 2010;93:1378–1387. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.01.153.
90.Busada J.T., Velte E.K., Serra N., Cook K., Niedenberger B.A., Willis W.D., Goulding E.H., Eddy E.M., Geyer C.B. Rhox 13 is required for a quantitatively normal first wave of spermatogenesis in mice. Reproduction. 2016;152:379–388. doi: 10.1530/REP-16-0268.
91.Dobs Y.E., Ali M.M. The epigenetic modulation of alcohol/ethanol and cannabis exposure/co-exposure during different stages. Open Biol. 2019;9:180115. doi: 10.1098/rsob.180115.
92.Pucci M., Rapino C., Di Francesco A., Dainese E., D’Addario C., Maccarrone M. Epigenetic control of skin differentiation genes by phytocannabinoids. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2013;170:581–591. doi: 10.1111/bph.12309.
93.Paradisi A., Pasquariello N., Barcaroli D., Maccarrone M. Anandamide regulates keratinocyte differentiation by inducing DNA methylation in a CB1 receptor-dependent manner. J. Biol. Chem. 2008;283:6005–6012. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M707964200.
94.Rotter A., Bayerlein K., Hansbauer M., Weiland J., Sperling W., Kornhuber J., Biermann T. CB1 and CB2 receptor expression and promoter methylation in patients with cannabis dependence. Eur. Addict. Res. 2013;19:13–20. doi: 10.1159/000338642.
95.Yang X., Hegde V.L., Rao R., Zhang J., Nagarkatti P.S., Nagarkatti M. Histone modifications are associated with Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol-mediated alterations in antigen-specific T cell responses. J. Biol. Chem. 2014;289:18707–18718. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.545210.
96.Prini P., Penna F., Sciuccati E., Alberio T., Rubino T. Chronic Delta (8)-THC Exposure Differently Affects Histone Modifications in the Adolescent and Adult Rat Brain. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017;18:2094. doi: 10.3390/ijms18102094.
97.Tomasiewicz H.C., Jacobs M.M., Wilkinson M.B., Wilson S.P., Nestler E.J., Hurd Y.L. Proenkephalin mediates the enduring effects of adolescent cannabis exposure associated with adult opiate vulnerability. Biol. Psychiatry. 2012;72:803–810. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.04.026.
98.Zumbrun E.E., Sido J.M., Nagarkatti P.S., Nagarkatti M. Epigenetic Regulation of Immunological Alterations Following Prenatal Exposure to Marijuana Cannabinoids and its Long Term Consequences in Offspring. J. Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2015;10:245–254. doi: 10.1007/s11481-015-9586-0.
99.DiNieri J.A., Wang X., Szutorisz H., Spano S.M., Kaur J., Casaccia P., Dow-Edwards D., Hurd Y.L. Maternal cannabis use alters ventral striatal dopamine D2 gene regulation in the offspring. Biol. Psychiatry. 2011;70:763–769. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.06.027.
100.Prini P., Rusconi F., Zamberletti E., Gabaglio M., Penna F., Fasano M., Battaglioli E., Parolaro D., Rubino T. Adolescent THC exposure in female rats leads to cognitive deficits through a mechanism involving chromatin modifications in the prefrontal cortex. J. Psychiatry Neurosci. JPN. 2017;42:170082. doi: 10.1503/jpn.170082.
101.Hegde V.L., Tomar S., Jackson A., Rao R., Yang X., Singh U.P., Singh N.P., Nagarkatti P.S., Nagarkatti M. Distinct microRNA expression profile and targeted biological pathways in functional myeloid-derived suppressor cells induced by Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol in vivo: Regulation of CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha by microRNA-690. J. Biol. Chem. 2013;288:36810–36826. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.503037.
102.Chandra L.C., Kumar V., Torben W., Vande Stouwe C., Winsauer P., Amedee A., Molina P.E., Mohan M. Chronic administration of Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol induces intestinal anti-inflammatory microRNA expression during acute simian immunodeficiency virus infection of rhesus macaques. J. Virol. 2015;89:1168–1181. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01754-14.
103.Tomas-Roig J., Benito E., Agis-Balboa R.C., Piscitelli F., Hoyer-Fender S., Di Marzo V., Havemann-Reinecke U. Chronic exposure to cannabinoids during adolescence causes long-lasting behavioral deficits in adult mice. Addict. Biol. 2017;22:1778–1789. doi: 10.1111/adb.12446.
104.Khare M., Taylor A.H., Konje J.C., Bell S.C. Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol inhibits cytotrophoblast cell proliferation and modulates gene transcription. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2006;12:321–333. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gal036.
105.Schrott R., Acharya K., Itchon-Ramos N., Hawkey A.B., Pippen E., Mitchell J.T., Kollins S.H., Levin E.D., Murphy S.K. Cannabis use is associated with potentially heritable widespread changes in autism candidate gene DLGAP2 DNA methylation in sperm. Epigenetics. 2019:1–13. doi: 10.1080/15592294.2019.1656158.
106.Szutorisz H., Hurd Y.L. High times for cannabis: Epigenetic imprint and its legacy on brain and behavior. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2018;85:93–101. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.05.011.
107.Watson C.T., Szutorisz H., Garg P., Martin Q., Landry J.A., Sharp A.J., Hurd Y.L. Genome-Wide DNA Methylation Profiling Reveals Epigenetic Changes in the Rat Nucleus Accumbens Associated With Cross-Generational Effects of Adolescent THC Exposure. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2015;40:2993–3005. doi: 10.1038/npp.2015.155.
108.Levin E.D., Hawkey A.B., Hall B.J., Cauley M., Slade S., Yazdani E., Kenou B., White H., Wells C., Rezvani A.H., et al. Paternal THC exposure in rats causes long-lasting neurobehavioral effects in the offspring. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 2019;74:106806. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2019.04.003.
109.Ibn Lahmar Andaloussi Z., Taghzouti K., Abboussi O. Behavioural and epigenetic effects of paternal exposure to cannabinoids during adolescence on offspring vulnerability to stress. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. 2019;72:48–54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2018.11.007.
110.Ramer R., Hinz B. Antitumorigenic targets of cannabinoids—Current status and implications. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets. 2016;20:1219–1235. doi: 10.1080/14728222.2016.1177512.
111.Houldsworth J., Korkola J.E., Bosl G.J., Chaganti R.S. Biology and genetics of adult male germ cell tumors. J. Clin. Oncol. 2006;24:5512–5518. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.4285.
112.Huyghe E., Matsuda T., Thonneau P. Increasing incidence of testicular cancer worldwide: A review. J. Urol. 2003;170:5–11. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000053866.68623.da.
113.Dieckmann K.P., Pichlmeier U. Re: Bilateral testicular germ cell tumors in Turkey: Increase in incidence in last decade and evaluation of risk factors in 30 patients. J. Urol. 2007;178:2222–2223. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.07.055.
114.Znaor A., Skakkebaek N.E., Rajpert-De Meyts E., Laversanne M., Kulis T., Gurney J., Sarfati D., McGlynn K.A., Bray F. Testicular cancer incidence predictions in Europe 2010–2035: A rising burden despite population ageing. Int. J. Cancer. 2019 doi: 10.1002/ijc.32810.
115.Gurney J.K., Florio A.A., Znaor A., Ferlay J., Laversanne M., Sarfati D., Bray F., McGlynn K.A. International Trends in the Incidence of Testicular Cancer: Lessons from 35 Years and 41 Countries. Eur. Urol. 2019;76:615–623. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.07.002.
116.Moch H., Cubilla A.L., Humphrey P.A., Reuter V.E., Ulbright T.M. The 2016 WHO Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs-Part A: Renal, Penile, and Testicular Tumours. Eur. Urol. 2016;70:93–105. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.029.
117.Batool A., Karimi N., Wu X.N., Chen S.R., Liu Y.X. Testicular germ cell tumor: A comprehensive review. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. CMLS. 2019;76:1713–1727. doi: 10.1007/s00018-019-03022-7.
118.Skakkebaek N.E., Berthelsen J.G., Giwercman A., Muller J. Carcinoma-in-situ of the testis: Possible origin from gonocytes and precursor of all types of germ cell tumours except spermatocytoma. Int. J. Androl. 1987;10:19–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.1987.tb00161.x.
119.Rajpert-De Meyts E., Bartkova J., Samson M., Hoei-Hansen C.E., Frydelund-Larsen L., Bartek J., Skakkebaek N.E. The emerging phenotype of the testicular carcinoma in situ germ cell. APMIS. 2003;111:267–278. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0463.2003.11101301.x.
120.Rajpert-De Meyts E., Jacobsen G.K., Bartkova J., Aubry F., Samson M., Bartek J., Skakkebaek N.E. The immunohistochemical expression pattern of Chk2, p53, p19INK4d, MAGE-A4 and other selected antigens provides new evidence for the premeiotic origin of spermatocytic seminoma. Histopathology. 2003;42:217–226. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2559.2003.01587.x.
121.Sesterhenn I.A., Davis C.J., Jr. Pathology of germ cell tumors of the testis. Cancer Control. 2004;11:374–387. doi: 10.1177/107327480401100605.
122.Banks K., Tuazon E., Berhane K., Koh C.J., De Filippo R.E., Chang A., Kim S.S., Daneshmand S., Davis-Dao C., Lewinger J.P., et al. Cryptorchidism and testicular germ cell tumors: Comprehensive meta-analysis reveals that association between these conditions diminished over time and is modified by clinical characteristics. Front. Endocrinol. 2012;3:182. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2012.00182.
123.Petersen P.M., Giwercman A., Hansen S.W., Berthelsen J.G., Daugaard G., Rorth M., Skakkebaek N.E. Impaired testicular function in patients with carcinoma-in-situ of the testis. J. Clin. Oncol. 1999;17:173–179. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.1.173.
124.Cools M., Honecker F., Stoop H., Veltman J.D., de Krijger R.R., Steyerberg E., Wolffenbuttel K.P., Bokemeyer C., Lau Y.F., Drop S.L., et al. Maturation delay of germ cells in fetuses with trisomy 21 results in increased risk for the development of testicular germ cell tumors. Hum. Pathol. 2006;37:101–111. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2005.09.021.
125.Verp M.S., Simpson J.L. Abnormal sexual differentiation and neoplasia. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 1987;25:191–218. doi: 10.1016/0165-4608(87)90180-4.
126.Daling J.R., Doody D.R., Sun X., Trabert B.L., Weiss N.S., Chen C., Biggs M.L., Starr J.R., Dey S.K., Schwartz S.M. Association of marijuana use and the incidence of testicular germ cell tumors. Cancer. 2009;115:1215–1223. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24159.
127.Trabert B., Sigurdson A.J., Sweeney A.M., Strom S.S., McGlynn K.A. Marijuana use and testicular germ cell tumors. Cancer. 2011;117:848–853. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25499.
128.Callaghan R.C., Allebeck P., Akre O., McGlynn K.A., Sidorchuk A. Cannabis Use and Incidence of Testicular Cancer: A 42-Year Follow-up of Swedish Men between 1970 and 2011. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2017;26:1644–1652. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0428.
129.Gurney J., Shaw C., Stanley J., Signal V., Sarfati D. Cannabis exposure and risk of testicular cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:897. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1905-6.
130.Lacson J.C., Bernstein L., Cortessis V.K. Potential impact of age at first marijuana use on the development of nonseminomatous testicular germ cell tumors. Cancer. 2013;119:1284–1285. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27878.
131.Lacson J.C., Carroll J.D., Tuazon E., Castelao E.J., Bernstein L., Cortessis V.K. Population-based case-control study of recreational drug use and testis cancer risk confirms an association between marijuana use and nonseminoma risk. Cancer. 2012;118:5374–5383. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27554.
132.Muller L., Radtke A., Decker J., Koch M., Belge G. The Synthetic Cannabinoid WIN 55,212-2 Elicits Death in Human Cancer Cell Lines. Anticancer Res. 2017;37:6341–6345. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.12086.
133.Cavallo F., Graziani G., Antinozzi C., Feldman D.R., Houldsworth J., Bosl G.J., Chaganti R.S., Moynahan M.E., Jasin M., Barchi M. Reduced proficiency in homologous recombination underlies the high sensitivity of embryonal carcinoma testicular germ cell tumors to Cisplatin and poly (adp-ribose) polymerase inhibition. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e51563. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051563.
134.Cavallo F., Feldman D.R., Barchi M. Revisiting DNA damage repair, p53-mediated apoptosis and cisplatin sensitivity in germ cell tumors. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2013;57:273–280. doi: 10.1387/ijdb.130135mb.
135.Xu X., Liu Y., Huang S., Liu G., Xie C., Zhou J., Fan W., Li Q., Wang Q., Zhong D., et al. Overexpression of cannabinoid receptors CB1 and CB2 correlates with improved prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 2006;171:31–38. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2006.06.014.

Cannabinoid Receptors Signaling in the Development, Epigenetics, and Tumours of Male Germ Cells.

Related local records

Studies

Conditions

Cannabinoids and active compounds

Connected local records

Related research

Cannabinoid Receptors Signaling in the Development, Epigenetics, and Tumours of Male Germ Cells

License

Authors

Abstract

Untitled section

Article notes

Untitled section

Author notes

1. Introduction

2. Male Germ Cell Development

3. Epigenetic Modifications in Male Germ Cell Development

4. Endocannabinoid System and Male Reproduction

5. Cannabinoid Receptors in Male Germ Cell Development

5.1. Cannabinoid Receptor CB₁

5.2. Cannabinoid receptor CB₂

5.3. Role of Cannabinoid Receptors in Epigenetic Modifications during Male Germ Cell Development

6. Cannabinoid Receptors and Testicular Tumours

7. Concluding Remarks

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions

Funding

Conflicts of Interest

References

Untitled section

References

Additional materials

Studies

Conditions

Cannabinoids and active compounds

Related research

Abstract

Untitled section

Article notes

Untitled section

Author notes

1. Introduction

2. Male Germ Cell Development

3. Epigenetic Modifications in Male Germ Cell Development

4. Endocannabinoid System and Male Reproduction

5. Cannabinoid Receptors in Male Germ Cell Development

5.1. Cannabinoid Receptor CB1

5.2. Cannabinoid receptor CB2

5.3. Role of Cannabinoid Receptors in Epigenetic Modifications during Male Germ Cell Development

6. Cannabinoid Receptors and Testicular Tumours

7. Concluding Remarks

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions

Funding

Conflicts of Interest

References

Untitled section

References

Additional materials

5.1. Cannabinoid Receptor CB₁

5.2. Cannabinoid receptor CB₂