Developing Oligo Probes for Chromosomes Identification in Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.)

Article type: Research Article

Keywords: cytogenetic markers, crop, dioecious, oligo-FISH, hybridization, repeat

Authors: Dmitry V. Romanov, Gennady I. Karlov ⚬, Mikhail G. Divashuk ⚬

License: © 2022 by the authors. CC BY 4.0 Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Article links: DOI: 10.3390/plants11151900  |  PubMed: 35893604  |  PMC: PMC9332022

Relevance: Relevant: mentioned in keywords or abstract

Full text: PDF (730 KB)

1. Introduction

Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) is an important agricultural plant, that has been cultivated for more than 5000 years [ref. 1]. Furthermore, it is one of the oldest plant sources to serve as a food and technical crop [ref. 2,ref. 3,ref. 4,ref. 5,ref. 6]. C. sativa has long been used for medical purposes dating back to ancient times. The plant has medicinal usage in the treatment of burns, pain, glaucoma, nausea, cardiovascular and bronchopulmonary diseases, depression, neuralgia, anemia, and bone fragility, among others [ref. 7,ref. 8,ref. 9,ref. 10,ref. 11,ref. 12,ref. 13,ref. 14,ref. 15].

Plant sex chromosomes are very rare; they have been reported in about 40 species [ref. 16,ref. 17,ref. 18]. C. sativa is a dioecious plant with an XX\XY sex determination system [ref. 19,ref. 20,ref. 21,ref. 22]; the chromosome number is 2n = 20 [ref. 23]. The haploid nuclear genome size for males and females is calculated to be 843 mega-base pairs (Mbp) and 818 Mbp, respectively [ref. 24,ref. 25]. Sex determination is important for cannabis production and depends on the specific application. For instance, the unfertilized female flowers contain higher levels of cannabinoids and seeded flowers are undesirable for medicinal applications [ref. 24]. C. sativa can be used for better understanding of the evolution of sex chromosomes [ref. 23,ref. 26,ref. 27]. A high level of polymorphism has been noted in C. sativa [ref. 28,ref. 29]. Furthermore, the chromosomal polymorphism has been detected by FISH on the inter- and intra-cultivar levels of C. sativa [ref. 23]. The high level of polymorphism determines the importance of C. sativa cytological studies for cultivar identification and characterization.

Cytogenetic markers help to distinguish similar plant chromosomes, including sex chromosomes, which is important for the breeding process [ref. 19,ref. 30]. Cytogenetic markers also help us to associate genomic assemblies with physical chromosomes [ref. 31,ref. 32]. DNA repeats for FISH analysis usually need to be amplified in a bacterial plasmid, extracted, and then labeled by nick translation [ref. 33,ref. 34]. In addition, FISH probes can be generated by PCR, but DNA isolation is previously required [ref. 35,ref. 36,ref. 37]. Thus, the procedure for preparing the probes is time consuming. Synthetic oligonucleotides with a fluorescent label can also be used as a probe for FISH [ref. 38,ref. 39] or ND-FISH analysis [ref. 40,ref. 41,ref. 42,ref. 43,ref. 44,ref. 45,ref. 46,ref. 47,ref. 48]. Such a probe is convenient to use since fluorochrome labeled oligonucleotides can be purchased directly from commercial sources. ND-FISH have a short hybridization time and no denaturation process, saving the structure of chromosomes, reagents and other resources [ref. 40,ref. 46,ref. 47,ref. 49]. Based on these advantages, the method is widely used to identify plant chromosomes [ref. 39,ref. 40,ref. 42,ref. 47,ref. 48]. Moreover, ND-FISH technology can be used to identify crop varieties [ref. 50]. ND-FISH is simple and convenient, but less reproducible in a series of experiments [ref. 46].

Oligos are being developed for easy application, which allows researchers to obtain results by fast oligo-FISH or ND-FISH in a short time. Oligos have been developed and successfully used for cereals [ref. 40,ref. 41,ref. 42,ref. 43,ref. 51,ref. 52] and other crops [ref. 53,ref. 54,ref. 55]. In this article, we report the development of oligo-labeled probes, based on CS-1 [ref. 56] and CS-237 [ref. 31] repeats for rapid oligo-FISH. The possibility of their use as cytological markers for C. sativa sex and some somatic chromosomes is discussed.

2. Results and Discussion

To compare the efficiency between conventional FISH and oligo-FISH we used them in turn. The first experiment was carried out on C. sativa chromosomes with PCR labelled probes. As a result, hybridization signals of CS-1 (Figure 1a) and CS-237 (Figure 1b) were detected as described by Divashuk et al. [ref. 56] and Alexandrov et al. [ref. 31], respectively. Satellites are often separated from the chromosome 8, as shown in Figure 1b.

Labeled oligos were designed and synthesized for the repeats CS-1 and CS-237 by Primer3 software [ref. 57] for more simple use of them as cytogenetic markers. For each repeat we designed two different sequences of oligos to increase the chances of successful hybridization. Labeling was carried out by using various fluorophores (FAM, TAMRA, Cy5) (Table 1) for more convenient use in combination with other labeled probes.

All the oligos were hybridized on C. sativa chromosomes by rapid oligo-FISH (Figure 2). Hybridization signals were observed for all the developed oligos. The results of the oligo-FISH probe detection with all the oligos on C. sativa chromosomes were similar as for FISH with the PCR labelled probes. There were no non-specific signals interfering with the work with the metaphase plates.

We found that the oligo-probes oligoCS-1-FAM, oligoCS-1-Cy5, and oligoCS-1-TAMRA are located in the subtelomeric region on both arms of all C. sativa chromosomes, except for the long arm of chromosome 3, the short arm of chromosome 8, and the long arm of the Y chromosome at the same positions. The oligo-probes oligoCS-237-FAM, oligoCS-237-Cy5, and oligoCS-237-TAMRA are located in the proximal part of the short arm of chromosome 6 and in the distal part of the short arm of chromosome 8 at the same positions. Thus, we can use any oligo with any dye from Table 1 suitable for a particular experiment. The positions of the oligos completely coincide with the positions of the corresponding repeats on C. sativa chromosomes [ref. 31,ref. 56]. We noted a different intensity of signals in different plants of C. sativa, which is quite consistent with Razumova et al. [ref. 23], where subtelomere hybridization sites disappear or new hybridization sites appear. This interesting phenomenon for the cross-pollinated plant is relatively expected and requires further study.

Some chromosomes of C. sativa are difficult to distinguish from each other without the use of cytological markers (chromosomes 5 and 6, X and Y) since they have almost the same lengths and centromeric indexes. Differences in the position of the oligo-probes for CS-1 and CS-237 repeats on C. sativa chromosomes make it possible to distinguish chromosomes 5 and 6, X and Y and easily identify chromosomes 3 and 8. Razumova et al. [ref. 23] showed different variations of FISH signals for the CS-1 repeat on chromosome 8 and on chromosome X. Nevertheless, the combined use of the oligo-probes for CS-1 and CS-237 repeats can identify these chromosomes. Thus, the probes can be recommended as cytogenetic markers for better identification of C. sativa chromosomes 3, 6, 8, X and Y by rapid oligo-FISH.

3. Conclusions

In conclusion, the oligonucleotide probes oligoCS-1-FAM, oligoCS-1-Cy5, oligoCS-1-TAMRA, oligoCS-237-FAM, oligoCS-237-Cy5, and oligoCS-237-TAMRA have been developed in the present study. They can be used to conveniently identify sex and somatic chromosomes and their polymorphism in hemp using rapid oligo-FISH.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Material

For the study of mitosis metaphase chromosomes, cv ‘‘Zenitsa’’ (dioecious) seeds of C. sativa were used (originated by P.P. Lukyanenko Krasnodar Research and the Development Institute of Agriculture, Krasnodar, Russia). The seeds were harvested in 2020 and then stored at +4 °C.

4.2. Chromosome Preparation

C. sativa seeds were germinated on moist filter paper in Petri dishes at 24 °C in the dark for 72 h. The seedlings (2–3 cm long) were used to prepare the slides of mitotic metaphase chromosomes as described by Romanov et al. [ref. 58].

4.3. DNA Probes and Labeling

Young seedlings of C. sativa were used for DNA isolation by the CTAB method [ref. 59]. Repeat sequences CS-1 and CS-237, previously described by Divashuk et al. [ref. 56] and Alexandrov et al. [ref. 31], respectively, were used to design primers and oligos by using the Primer3 software v.4.1.0 [ref. 57]. DNA labeling was performed by PCR with biotin-16-dUTP according to the manufacturer’s instruction (Boehringer, Germany). The oligos were synthesized and labeled by FAM, TAMRA or Cy5 (Evrogen JSC, Moscow, Russia).

4.4. Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) and Oligo-FISH

The FISH experiments were performed as described by Karlov et al. [ref. 60]. Post-hybridization washing was performed in 50% (v/v) formamide in 2× SSC for 15 min at 42 °C, while the theoretical washing stringency was about 80%. The chromosomes were counterstained with 1 mg/mL DAPI and mounted in Vectashield (Vector laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). Oligo-FISH experiments were performed as FISH, but without the detection step, as described by Kuznetsova et al. [ref. 46]. The hybridization procedure for FISH and oligo-FISH lasted for 1 h and 16 h, respectively, at 37 °C.

4.5. Microscopy and Image Analysis

Chromosome preparations were viewed by using a THUNDER 3D Tissue microscope with a filter set DFT51111, a fluorescence light source LED3, and a digital camera DFC9000 GTC (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). Multichannel fluorescence recording, image processing for brightness/contrast and color settings were performed using LasX software (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). The karyotype for C. sativa metaphase chromosomes was developed by Divashuk et al. [ref. 56] and improved by Alexandrov et al. [ref. 31]. In this article, chromosome numbering is in accordance with Alexandrov et al. [ref. 31]. Chromosomes 3, 5, 6, 8, X, and Y according to Alexandrov et al. [ref. 31] correspond to chromosomes 4, 6, 3, 9, X, and Y, respectively, according to Divashuk et al. [ref. 56].

References

1. M.A. ElSohly, M.M. Radwan, W. Gul, S. Chandra, A. Galal. Phytochemistry of Cannabis sativa L.. Prog. Chem. Org. Nat. Prod., 2017. [DOI | PubMed]
2. J.H. Cherney, E. Small. Industrial Hemp in North America: Production, Politics and Potential. Agronomy, 2016. [DOI]
3. G. Crini, E. Lichtfouse, G. Chanet, N. Morin-Crini. Applications of hemp in textiles, paper industry, insulation and building materials, horticulture, animal nutrition, food and beverages, nutraceuticals, cosmetics and hygiene, medicine, agrochemistry, energy production and environment: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett., 2020. [DOI]
4. H.E. Jiang, X. Li, Y.X. Zhao, D.K. Ferguson, F. Hueber, S. Bera, Y.F. Wang, L.C. Zhao, C.J. Liu, C.S. Li. A new insight into Cannabis sativa (Cannabaceae) utilization from 2500-year-old Yanghai Tombs, Xinjiang, China. J. Ethnopharmacol., 2006. [DOI | PubMed]
5. U. Kriese, E. Schumann, W.E. Weber, M. Beyer, L. Brühl, B. Matthus. Oil content, tocopherol composition and fatty acid patterns of the seeds of 51 C. sativa L. genotypes. Euphytica, 2004. [DOI]
6. H.V.D. Werf, E.W.J.M. Mathussen, A.J. Haverkort. The potential of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) for sustainable fibre production: A crop physiological appraisal. Ann. Appl. Biol., 1996. [DOI]
7. D.I. Abrams, C.A. Jay, S.B. Shade, H. Vizoso, H. Reda, S. Press, M.E. Kelly, M.C. Rowbotham, K.L. Petersen. Cannabis in painful HIV-associated sensory neuropathy: A randomized placebo-controlled trial. Neurology, 2007. [DOI | PubMed]
8. C.M. Andre, J.F. Hausman, G. Guerriero. Cannabis sativa: The plant of the thousand and one molecules. Front. Plant Sci., 2016. [DOI | PubMed]
9. S.A. Bonini, M. Premoli, S. Tambaro, A. Kumar, G. Maccarinelli, M. Memo, A. Mastinu. Cannabis sativa: A comprehensive ethnopharmacological review of a medicinal plant with a long history. J. Ethnopharmacol., 2018. [DOI | PubMed]
10. J. Guindon, A.G. Hohmann. The endocannabinoid system and pain. Curr. Drug Targets CNS Neurol. Disord., 2009. [DOI]
11. M.D. Merlin. Archaeological evidence for the tradition of psychoactive plant use in the old world. Econ. Bot., 2003. [DOI]
12. D.J. Potter. A review of the cultivation and processing of cannabis (Cannabis sativa L.) for production of prescription medicines in the UK. Drug Test. Anal., 2014. [DOI | PubMed]
13. E. Russo. Hemp for headache: An in-depth historical and scientific review of cannabis in migraine treatment. J. Cannabis Ther., 2001. [DOI]
14. N.E. Slatkin. Cannabinoids in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: Beyond prevention of acute emesis. J. Support. Oncol., 2007
15. A.W. Zuardi. History of Cannabis as a medicine: A review. Braz. J. Psychiat., 2006. [DOI]
16. S.S. Renner. The relative and absolute frequencies of angiosperm sexual systems: Dioecy, monoecy, gynodioecy, and an updated online database. Am. J. Bot., 2014. [DOI | PubMed]
17. A. Muyle, R. Shearn, G.A. Marais. The evolution of sex chromosomes and dosage compensation in plants. Genome Biol. Evol., 2017. [DOI | PubMed]
18. C. Fruchard, G.A. Marais. Evolutionary Developmental Biology: A Reference Guide, 2021. [DOI]
19. M.G. Divashuk, O.S. Alexandrov, P.Y. Kroupin, G.I. Karlov. Molecular cytogenetic mapping of Humulus lupulus sex chromosomes. Cytogenet. Genome Res., 2011. [DOI | PubMed]
20. A. Grabowska-Joachimiak, M. Mosiolek, A. Lech, G. Góralski. C-Banding/DAPI and in situ hybridization reflect karyotype structure and sex chromosome differentiation in Humulus japonicus Siebold & Zucc. Cytogenet. Genome Res., 2011. [DOI | PubMed]
21. S. Matsunaga, S. Kawano. Sex determination by sex chromosomes in dioecious plants. Plant Biol., 2001. [DOI]
22. R. Ming, A. Bendahmane, S.S. Renner. Sex chromosomes in land plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol., 2011. [DOI | PubMed]
23. O.V. Razumova, O.S. Alexandrov, M.G. Divashuk, T.I. Sukhorada, G.I. Karlov. Molecular cytogenetic analysis of monoecious hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) cultivars reveals its karyotype variations and sex chromosomes constitution. Protoplasma, 2016. [DOI | PubMed]
24. M. Hesami, M. Pepe, M. Alizadeh, A. Rakei, A. Baiton, A.M.P. Jones. Recent advances in cannabis biotechnology. Ind. Crops Prod., 2020. [DOI]
25. B. Hurgobin, M. Tamiru-Oli, M.T. Welling, M.S. Doblin, A. Bacic, J. Whelan, M.G. Lewsey. Recent advances in Cannabis sativa genomics research. New Phytol., 2021. [DOI | PubMed]
26. D. Prentout, O. Razumova, B. Rhoné, H. Badouin, H. Henri, C. Feng, J. Käfer, G. Karlov, G.A. Marais. A high-throughput segregation analysis identifies the sex chromosomes of Cannabis sativa. bioRxiv, 2019. [DOI]
27. O.V. Razumova, M.G. Divashuk, O.S. Alexandrov, G.I. Karlov. GISH painting of the Y chromosomes suggests advanced phases of sex chromosome evolution in three dioecious Cannabaceae species (Humulus lupulus, H. japonicus, and Cannabis sativa). Protoplasma, 2022. [DOI]
28. V. Faeti, G. Mandolino, P. Ranalli. Genetic diversity of Cannabis sativa germplasm based on RAPD markers. Plant Breed., 1996. [DOI]
29. S. Forapani, A. Carboni, C. Paoletti, V.C. Moliterni, P. Ranalli, G. Mandolino. Comparison of hemp varieties using random amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Crop Sci., 2001. [DOI]
30. P.Y. Kroupin, V.M. Kuznetsova, E.A. Nikitina, Y.T. Martirosyan, G.I. Karlov, M.G. Divashuk. Development of new cytogenetic markers for Thinopyrum ponticum (Podp.) Z.-W. Liu & R.-C. Wang. Comp. Cytogenet., 2019. [DOI | PubMed]
31. O.S. Alexandrov, D.V. Romanov, M.G. Divshuk, O.V. Razumova, D.S. Ulyanov, G.I. Karlov. Studying and physical mapping of the 45S IGS linked CS-237 DNA repeat in Cannabis sativa L.. Plants, 2022. [DOI | PubMed]
32. Y.T. Chao, W.C. Chen, C.Y. Chen, H.Y. Ho, C.H. Yeh, Y.T. Kuo, C.L. Su, S.H. Yen, H.Y. Hsueh, J.H. Yeh. Chromosome-level assembly, genetic and physical mapping of Phalaenopsis aphrodite genome provides new insights into species adaptation and resources for orchid breeding. Plant Biotechnol. J., 2018. [DOI | PubMed]
33. P. Bray-Ward. FISH Probes and Labelling Techniques. FISH. A Practical Approach, 2002
34. L. Giorgetti, T. Piolot, E. Heard. High-resolution 3D DNA FISH using plasmid probes and computational correction of optical aberrations to study chromatin structure at the sub-megabase scale. Nuclear Bodies and Noncoding RNAs, 2015. [DOI]
35. D. Huber, L.V. von Voithenberg, G.V. Kaigala. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH): History, limitations and what to expect from micro-scale FISH?. Micro Nano Eng., 2018. [DOI]
36. J. Jiang. Fluorescence in situ hybridization in plants: Recent developments and future applications. Chromosome Res., 2019. [DOI | PubMed]
37. P. Kroupin, V. Kuznetsova, D. Romanov, A. Kocheshkova, G. Karlov, T.X. Dang, T.M.L. Khuat, I. Kirov, O. Alexandrov, A. Polkhovskiy. Pipeline for the rapid development of cytogenetic markers using genomic data of related species. Genes, 2019. [DOI]
38. T. Lang, G. Li, H. Wang, Z. Yu, Q. Chen, E. Yang, S. Fu, Z. Tang, Z. Yang. Physical location of tandem repeats in the wheat genome and application for chromosome identification. Planta, 2019. [DOI | PubMed]
39. Z. Tang, Z. Yang, S. Fu. Oligonucleotides replacing the roles of repetitive sequences pAs1, pSc119. 2, pTa-535, pTa71, CCs1, and pAWRC. 1 for FISH analysis. J. Appl. Genet., 2014. [DOI | PubMed]
40. S. Fu, L. Chen, Y. Wang, M. Li, Z. Yang, L. Qiu, B. Yan, Z. Ren, Z. Tang. Oligonucleotide probes for ND-FISH analysis to identify rye and wheat chromosomes. Sci. Rep., 2015. [DOI | PubMed]
41. S. Tang, L. Qiu, Z. Xiao, S. Fu, Z. Tang. New oligonucleotide probes for ND-FISH analysis to identify barley chromosomes and to investigate polymorphisms of wheat chromosomes. Genes, 2016. [DOI]
42. S. Tang, Z. Tang, L. Qiu, Z. Yang, G. Li, T. Lang, W. Zhu, J. Zhang, S. Fu. Developing new oligo probes to distinguish specific chromosomal segments and the A, B, D genomes of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using ND-FISH. Front. Plant Sci., 2018. [DOI | PubMed]
43. W. Xi, S. Tang, H. Du, J. Luo, Z. Tang, S. Fu. ND-FISH-positive oligonucleotide probes for detecting specific segments of rye (Secale cereale L.) chromosomes and new tandem repeats in rye. Crop J., 2020. [DOI]
44. Á. Cuadrado, H. Golczyk, N. Jouve. A novel, simple and rapid nondenaturing FISH (ND-FISH) technique for the detection of plant telomeres. Potential used and possible target structures detected. Chromosome Res., 2009. [DOI | PubMed]
45. Á. Cuadrado, N. Jouve. Chromosomal detection of simple sequence repeats (SSRs) using nondenaturing FISH (ND-FISH). Chromosoma, 2010. [DOI | PubMed]
46. V.M. Kuznetsova, O.V. Razumova, G.I. Karlov, T.X. Dang, P.Y. Kroupin, M.G. Divashuk. Some peculiarities in application of denaturating and non-denaturating in situ hybridization on chromosomes of cereals. Mosc. Univ. Biol. Sci. Bull., 2019. [DOI]
47. Z. Li, Z. Ren, F. Tan, Z. Tang, S. Fu, B. Yan, T. Ren. Molecular cytogenetic characterization of new wheat-rye 1R (1B) substitution and translocation lines from a Chinese Secale cereal L. Aigan with resistance to stripe rust. PLoS ONE, 2016. [PubMed]
48. Z. Xiao, S. Tang, L. Qiu, Z. Tang, S. Fu. Oligonucleotides and ND-FISH displaying different arrangements of tandem repeats and identification of Dasypyrum villosum chromosomes in wheat backgrounds. Molecules, 2017. [DOI]
49. T. Ren, M. He, Z. Sun, F. Tan, P. Luo, Z. Tang, S. Fu, B. Yan, Z. Ren, Z. Li. The polymorphisms of oligonucleotide probes in wheat cultivars determined by ND-FISH. Molecules, 2019. [DOI]
50. M. Jiang, Z.Q. Xaio, S.L. Fu, Z.X. Tang. FISH karyotype of 85 common wheat cultivars/lines displayed by ND-FISH using oligonucleotide probes. Cereal Res. Commun., 2017. [DOI]
51. G. Li, T. Zhang, Z. Yu, H. Wang, E. Yang, Z. Yang. An efficient Oligo-FISH painting system for revealing chromosome rearrangements and polyploidization in Triticeae. Plant J., 2021. [DOI | PubMed]
52. X. Liu, S. Sun, Y. Wu, Y. Zhou, S. Gu, H. Yu, C. Yi, M. Gu, J. Jiang, B. Liu. Dual-color oligo-FISH can reveal chromosomal variations and evolution in Oryza species. Plant J., 2020. [DOI | PubMed]
53. L. Fu, Q. Wang, L. Li, T. Lang, J. Guo, S. Wang, Z. Sun, S. Han, B. Huang, W. Dong. Physical mapping of repetitive oligonucleotides facilitates the establishment of a genome map-based karyotype to identify chromosomal variations in peanut. BMC Plant Biol., 2021. [DOI | PubMed]
54. X. Luo, Z. He. Distribution of FISH oligo-5S rDNA and oligo-(AGGGTTT) 3 in Hibiscus mutabilis L.. Genome, 2021. [DOI | PubMed]
55. X. Luo, J. Liu, Z. He. Oligo-FISH Can Identify Chromosomes and Distinguish Hippophaë rhamnoides L. Taxa. Genes, 2022. [DOI | PubMed]
56. M.G. Divashuk, O.S. Alexandrov, O.V. Razumova, I.V. Kirov, G.I. Karlov. Molecular cytogenetic characterization of the dioecious Cannabis sativa with an XY chromosome sex determination system. PLoS ONE, 2014. [DOI | PubMed]
57. A. Untergasser, I. Cutcutache, T. Koressaar, J. Ye, B.C. Faircloth, M. Remm, S.G. Rozen. Primer3—new capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res., 2012. [DOI | PubMed]
58. D.V. Romanov, S.Y. Shirnin, G.I. Karlov, M.G. Divashuk. Cytogenetic Study of Aegopodium podagraria (Umbelliferae) for Use in Breeding. Mosc. Univ. Biol. Sci. Bull., 2020. [DOI]
59. S.O. Rogers, A.J. Bendich. Extraction of DNA from plant tissues. Plant Molecular Biology Manual, 1989. [DOI]
60. G.I. Karlov, T.V. Danilova, C. Horlemann, G. Weber. Molecular cytogenetics in hop (Humulus lupulus L.) and identification of sex chromosomes by DAPI-banding. Euphytica, 2003. [DOI]