Cannabinoids in the Pathophysiology of Skin Inflammation.

Abstract

Cannabinoids are increasingly-used substances in the treatment of chronic pain, some neuropsychiatric disorders and more recently, skin disorders with an inflammatory component. However, various studies cite conflicting results concerning the cellular mechanisms involved, while others suggest that cannabinoids may even exert pro-inflammatory behaviors. This paper aims to detail and clarify the complex workings of cannabinoids in the molecular setting of the main dermatological inflammatory diseases, and their interactions with other substances with emerging applications in the treatment of these conditions. Also, the potential role of cannabinoids as antitumoral drugs is explored in relation to the inflammatory component of skin cancer. In vivo and in vitro studies that employed either phyto-, endo-, or synthetic cannabinoids were considered in this paper. Cannabinoids are regarded with growing interest as eligible drugs in the treatment of skin inflammatory conditions, with potential anticancer effects, and the readiness in monitoring of effects and the facility of topical application may contribute to the growing support of the use of these substances. Despite the promising early results, further controlled human studies are required to establish the definitive role of these products in the pathophysiology of skin inflammation and their usefulness in the clinical setting.

Untitled section

Keywords: cannabinoids, skin cancer, dermatology, inflammation, cell signaling, inflammatory disorders

Article notes

Untitled section

Received 2019 Dec 30; Accepted 2020 Feb 2; Collection date 2020 Feb.

Author notes

1. Introduction

Specific medical benefits of cannabinoids have been unveiled even from ancient times, and the relatively recent discovery of the endocannabinoid system (ECS) has led to a target-based drug discovery approach as emerging research strives to expand the applications of cannabinoids for different diseases, and new cannabinoid molecules are developed to target specific receptors with various affinities [1]. Cannabinoids have been used effectively in different areas of clinical medicine such as the control of nausea, vomiting, and spasticity, the treatment of glaucoma and relief of chronic pain [2]. However, the last decade has been marked by a large number of Phase I and II studies aiming to introduce various cannabinoids as potential treatments in conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease, tuberous sclerosis, epilepsy, glioma, schizophrenia, type 2 diabetes, anxiety disorder, multiple sclerosis, graft-versus-host disease, and many others [3,4,5,6,7]. Their adjuvant or curative potential was also assessed in several neuropsychiatric disorders, but also in oncological and dermatological diseases [8,9,10,11]. The antitumor effects of cannabinoids have been investigated in populational studies, with encouraging results in cancers with rising incidence and prevalence, such as skin melanoma, leukemia, thyroid and liver cancers, diseases that bear high mortality and are encumbering through their complications [12,13,14,15].

New research into the anti-inflammatory properties of cannabinoids has shown mixed but overall positive results [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. The effects of cannabinoids on cancer may also partly arise from their effects on the inflammatory milieu of tumors, and further insight is provided by parallel studies into the pathogenesis of inflammatory and carcinogenic processes and their interferences [27].

Inflammatory skin disorders are a heterogeneous group, implying diverse pathogenic pathways and the involvement of complex regulating signaling loops. Cannabinoids seem to exert their properties on cutaneous inflammation in a dose-dependent manner through receptor-dependent and -independent mechanisms [28,29]. The intricacies of these pathways as well as the molecules involved in the metabolic interferences are addressed in this paper further on.

2. Cannabinoids

2.1. Description

“Cannabinoids” is a broad term that includes a large array of substances that share the common property of interacting with cannabinoid receptors (CB). By origin, cannabinoids may be classified either as phyto-, endo-, or synthetic cannabinoids. While only two substances, arachidonoyl ethanolamide (anandamide or AEA) and 2-arachidonoyl glycerol (2-AG), are considered primary endocannabinoids, phytocannabinoids count more than 110 members spanning 11 chemical classes, including psychotropic Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), while synthetic cannabinoids include hundreds of members divided into 6 classes [30,31,32,33]. The chemical formulas of the most relevant compounds cited in this paper are presented in Figure 1.

Figure 1The chemical formulas of the most relevant endo-, phyto-, and synthetic cannabinoids.

Regardless of their source, cannabinoids may elicit their effects on either of the two G protein-coupled cannabinoid receptors, namely CB1 and CB2, an action that can have various efficiency and effects [34].

2.2. Receptors

CB1 is widely expressed on the plasma membrane of neurons located in various structures of the central and peripheral nervous systems, more abundantly towards the synaptic terminals [35]. The presynaptic location is related to the role of cannabinoids in modulating neurotransmission, explaining one of the most commonly known effects of anxiolysis, which is accomplished by CB1 mediated decreases of γ-aminobutyric acid and cholecystokinin release [36]. CB1 was identified in various tissues outside of the nervous system, such as the skin, the gastrointestinal tract, the liver, the musculoskeletal system, and various immune cells [37].

CB2 was subsequently discovered, and albeit originally thought of as an exclusively peripheral CB, it was identified in all structures where CB1 was present, including the brain, but with limited expression [38]. Moreover, while the psychoactive properties of cannabinoids appear to be mostly mediated by CB1, CB2 seems to play a more important role in inflammation and pain, and is increasingly recognized as a neuroinflammation biomarker [39].

The existence of non-CB1, non-CB2 G protein-coupled cannabinoid receptors was revealed when endocannabinoids were proven to interact with other molecular targets. Thus, in CB receptors knockout animal models and in in vitro studies on glial cells and vascular endothelium, endocannabinoids induced similar effects [40,41]. Several orphan G-coupled protein receptors (GPR3, GPR6, GPR12, GPR18, GPR55, GPR119, and many others), transient receptor potential channels (TRPV1, TRPV2, TRPV3, TRPV4, TRPM8, and TRPA1), ligand-gated ion channels (5-HT3, glycine, and nicotinic acetylcholine), and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARα and PPARγ) were demonstrated to be targeted by, and to some extent mediate the effects of cannabinoids [42,43,44,45].

The normal skin and its appendages are rich in CB1 and CB2 receptors, both identified in keratinocytes, hair follicles, sebaceous glands, melanocytes, fibroblasts, nerve fibers, and adipocytes [46,47,48,49,50,51]. The abundance of cutaneous structures yielding cannabinoid receptors hints to the multiple signaling and regulating functions played by these substances. Benign and malignant skin tumors also express functional CB1 and CB2 receptors, an observation that led to the pursuit of anti-tumoral applications of cannabinoids [52]. Among the non-CB1, non-CB2 receptors targeted by cannabinoids, TRP channels play the most prominent role, as they respond to natural and synthetic cannabinoids that may trigger apoptosis or the release of chemokines and other signaling molecules [46,50,53]. The distribution of TRPs in keratinocytes, hair follicles, mast cells, melanocytes, sebocytes, nerve fibers, and other skin structures facilitates the cannabinoids’ supplementary effects in inflammation and immune response modulation [46,53,54,55,56].

2.3. Metabolism

Endocannabinoids are cleaved from membrane phospholipid precursors by distinct synthesis pathways, and are released through a mechanism independent of vesicle secretion [57]. AEA and 2-AG compete for the same facilitated diffusion carrier-mediated transportation and act as partial (AEA) or full (2-AG) agonists on CB1 and CB2 receptors [57,58]. Following uptake, both endocannabinoids are metabolized by fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH), cycloxygenase-2, 12- and 15-lipoxygenases, while 2-AG is also hydrolyzed by monoacylglycerol lipase (MAGL) [59,60].

The main phytocannabinoid, THC, has a variable bioavailability depending on the absorption pathway, demonstrating peak plasmatic concentrations in minutes after smoking, one hour after ophthalmic administration and several hours after ingestion [61]. Cannabidiol (CBD), another phytocannabinoid, has a low affinity for CB1 and CB2 and behaves as a negative allosteric modulator of CB1 and CB2 receptors by antagonizing other agonists [62,63]. Also, CBD stimulates the release of AEA by inhibiting FAAH, while also activating various other receptors [64].

Synthetic cannabinoids are usually stronger CB1 and/or CB2 agonists, and due to their large and increasing number of members, they use a multitude of pathways for metabolization, depending on their chemical structure, such as oxidation, hydroxylation, oxidative defluorination, and ester hydrolysis [31].

All cannabinoid classes interfere with the skin cannabinoid receptors and signaling, affecting the homeostasis of skin appendages and cutaneous cells’ metabolisms [65]. FAAH and MAGL have been identified in sebocytes, mast cells, melanocytes, fibroblasts, and other dermal cells, suggesting that the skin is more than an effector of the ECS, acting as a regulatory center of cannabinoids metabolism [50,66,67,68]. The cutaneous ECS is involved in skin differentiation, proliferation, and survival through the actions of AEA and 2-AG that are produced in various skin structures and modulate multiple functions of the skin and its appendages, including hair growth, maintaining the skin barrier integrity, immune response, and the processing of sensory input such as pruritus and pain [69,70,71,72].

Table 1 summarizes cannabinoid types, classes, and their receptor interactions [73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83].

Table 1Cannabinoids—structure and ligands.

Cannabinoid	Class	CB1 Affinity/Ki (nM)	CB Receptors Effects
Cannabinoid	Class	CB1 Affinity/Ki (nM)	CB2 Affinity/Ki (nM)	Efficacy
Anandamide (AEA)	Endo-	89	371	CB1 and CB2 partial agonist (CB1>CB2)
2-arachidonoyl glycerol (2-AG)	Endo-	472	1400
Cannabidiol (CBD)	Phyto-	4350 ± 390	2860 ± 1230	Non-competitive CB2 antagonist
Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)	Phyto-	40.7 ± 1.7	36.4 ± 10	CB1 and CB2 partial agonist
Cannabigerol (CBG)	Phyto-	1045 ± 74	1225 ± 85	CB1 and CB2 partial agonist. CB1 competitive antagonist
Cannabigerovarin (CBGV)	Phyto-	-	-	Insignificant effect on CB1 and CB2
Arachidonoyl-chloro-ethanolamide (ACEA)	Synthetic	1.4	> 2000	Selective CB1 agonist
Ajulemic acid (JBT-101)	Synthetic	32.3 ± 3.7	170.5 ± 7.8	CB1 and CB2 partial agonist
α-oleoyl oleylamine serinol (α-OOS)	Synthetic	unavailable data	-	Selective CB1 agonist
WIN 55,212-2	Synthetic	1.89 ± 0.09	0.28 ± 0.16	CB1 and CB2 full agonist
VCE-004.8	Synthetic	> 40,000	170 ± 50	Selective CB2 agonist
JWH-133	Synthetic	677 ± 132	3.4 ± 1	Selective CB2 full agonist
JWH-018	Synthetic	9.00 ± 5.00	2.94 ± 2.65	CB1 and CB2 full agonist
JWH-122	Synthetic	0.69 ± 0.05	1.2 ± 1.2	CB1 and CB2 full agonist
JWH-210	Synthetic	1.43 ± 0.39	0.94 ± 0.19	CB1 and CB2 full agonist

3. Inflammation Traits of the Skin

Skin inflammation is a complex, adaptative process, triggered by a multitude of factors, and relying on intricate mechanisms involving cells like platelets, lymphocytes, macrophages, dendritic cells, keratinocytes, and an array of molecules like cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors, interfering with other homeostatic processes such as the immune response, angiogenesis, and apoptosis. Regardless of the initiating factor, inflammatory skin disorders involve increased expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interferons and interleukins, leading to activation of various T helper cells and triggering activation cascades that may not be self-limited, causing the development of a chronic process [84].

The identification of crosstalk between inflammation and cancer in the skin has opened new research directions. Nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB), a mediator of inflammation, was found to play a pivotal role in activating signaling pathways in skin tumorigenesis [85,86]. Subsequently, numerous in vivo and in vitro studies have found more inflammatory chemokines, cytokines or proteases that are also involved in the transformation, survival, invasion, and metastasis of skin cancer cells, such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β), interleukins 6, 17, and 23, matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) 2 and 9, furin, cathepsin and many more [87,88]. Moreover, inhibition of the inflammatory response yields chemopreventive results, as demonstrated in animal models where the decrease of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) leads to a decline in UVB-induced carcinogenesis [89].

The skin acts as a neuroimmunoendocrine organ with a modulating effect on local blood and lymph flow, sweat glands function, immunoreactivity, and inflammatory response; these effects are facilitated by the integrated nervous system connections that are involved in regulating homeostasis in disruptive conditions such as activation of nociceptors by pain, trauma or inflammation [90,91,92,93,94,95,96]. The concept of dermal neurogenic inflammation was further refined using capsaicin, a molecule that represented the groundstone of inflammation and pain pathogenesis research in the skin, and was subsequently promoted for also having anticarcinogenic and immunomodulatory roles [97,98]. Cannabinoids have proven effective as protective agents in neuroinflammatory disorders, and their anti-inflammatory and immunomodulating effects have also proven beneficial in inflammatory skin disorders [99].

4. Cannabinoids’ Role in Inflammatory Skin Disorders

Despite their low rates of mortality, inflammatory skin disorders such as allergic contact dermatitis, psoriasis, acne, scleroderma, and dermatomyositis, have a great impact on the patients’ quality of life and self-esteem. These large array of diseases are associated with a substantial systemic burden of disease and when pruritus and pain are associated, the negative psychological effects are augmented, and the involvement of fibrotic changes may lead to permanent scarring, further enhancing the disease burden [84,100,101,102]. Benefiting from the ease of diagnosing, applying topical treatment and monitoring their evolution due to their superficial location, skin inflammatory disorders represent an increasingly pursued research focus. The development of animal models for these disorders has aided in the investigation of the pathophysiological processes involved, leading to a better understanding of the course of disease and possible mechanisms that may limit, or even revert the development of the illness [103,104,105]. The high impact on the patients’ lives and the healthcare system has prompted the research of new treatments, among which cannabinoids are regarded with growing interest due to their initial favorable results and limited adverse effects. Increasingly more clinical trials are launched with the intent of establishing the effectiveness of cannabinoids in the treatment of skin inflammatory disorders [15].

An added benefit of the usage of cannabinoids in the treatment of inflammatory skin disorders is the possibility of transcutaneous administration. Patches or similar delivery systems can offer a steady and prolonged drug infusion, with minimal local or systemic adverse effects while also avoiding first-pass metabolism [106]. While the absorption of cannabinoids is limited due to their hydrophobic nature, some compounds have higher absorption rates, such as CBD and cannabinol; drug absorption may be further amplified through the use of physical or chemical enhancers [107]. Preclinical and clinical testing on improving the transdermal administration routes is ongoing, aiming to further increase delivery rates and eliminate unwanted side effects [108].

4.1. Allergic Contact Dermatitis

Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is a type IV delayed hypersensitivity reaction developing as an immune response to an allergen, mediated by T cells and various cytokines and chemokines [109,110].

CBD suppresses the inflammatory reaction of allergic contact dermatitis in vitro, without cytotoxic effects. Thus CBD reduced inflammation in polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid-induced ACD in human keratinocyte (HaCaT) cells, by inhibiting the monocyte chemotactic protein-2 (MCP-2) chemokine and several pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukins (ILs) 6 and 8, and TNF-α [111]. Another in vitro study performed on splenocytes demonstrated similar effects in inflammatory reactions, as CBD decreased the activities of T and B-cells-mediated response, inhibited the release of interleukins 6, 8, and 17, TNF-α, and interferon (IFN)-γ, and modulated the immune response decreasing the activity of T helper 17 cells [112,113,114].

CB1 agonists also demonstrate anti-inflammatory effects in studies using α-oleoyl oleylamine serinol (α-OOS). Therefore, in an in vivo experimental model using phorbol ester-induced acute inflammation developed in mice and atopic dermatitis-like symptoms induced with oxazolone, CB1 agonists proved their anti-inflammatory action through several proposed mechanisms. Mast-cells downregulation, peroxisome-proliferator activated receptors (PPARs) activation, and the decrease of epidermal production of IFN-γ and several chemokines, such as CCL2, CCL8, and CXL10 were the possible anti-inflammatory involved pathways [115,116].

However, conflicting results have been obtained in mice models subjected to CB2 agonists and antagonists by different types of administration. As such, it is considered that CB2 antagonists may decrease inflammation through CB inactivation, but chronic blockade leads to augmenting the inflammatory component of allergic contact dermatitis [116,117,118].

4.2. Psoriasis

Psoriasis is an autoimmune inflammatory disorder that may affect the skin, associating epidermal proliferation, due to a dysregulation of the immune system; pro-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-12 and -23 and TNF-α, are produced, and the inflammatory milieu is developed and maintained with contribution from various cells, such as T-helper cells 1 and 17, keratinocytes, and dendritic cells alongside various immune cells [119,120,121,122].

Phytocannabinoids are promising drugs in the treatment of psoriasis due to their effects of inhibiting the proliferation of keratinocytes while also modulating the associated inflammatory component [123]. In human skin cultures, synthetic CB1 agonist arachidonoyl-chloro-ethanolamide (ACEA) inhibited keratinocyte cell proliferation in situ, while decreasing K6 and K16 expression in organ cultured human skin samples [81]. The beneficial effects of phytocannabinoids THC and CBD in psoriasis are the conversion of the pro-inflammatory Th1 profile to an anti-inflammatory Th2 type expression, and the anti-proliferative properties on keratinocytes; however, these effects seem predominantly mediated through PPARγ, independent of CBs, demonstrated by sustained results in CB1 and CB2 blockades on human papilloma virus (HPV)-16 E6/E7 transformed human skin keratinocytes cultures [124].

In 2019, a patent has been filed for the treatment of psoriasis with topical application of cannabidiol and cannabigerol, which showed dose-dependent effectiveness in the trial subjects, apparently via the inhibition of inflammatory cytokines and angiogenic growth factors while restoring the Th1/Th2 balance [125].

4.3. Acne

Acne is a skin disease with complex pathogeny, with inflammation at its center, triggered by various processes such as seborrhea, hormonal imbalances, immune reactions, and infectious and environmental factors [126].

Studied performed over 30 years ago have shown that topically applied phytocannabinoids have proven effective in alleviating 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA)-induced erythema of mouse skin [127]. Moreover, phytocannabinoids safely decrease sebum production, inhibit sebocytes proliferation and reduce the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines as demonstrated in multiple in vitro and in vivo studies, including a human trial where topical application for 12 weeks showed safety and good results in decreasing erythema and skin sebum [128,129,130]. The positive effects of cannabinoids seem to be non-CB1 non-CB2-mediated, as observed for CBD: CBD inhibits sebum secretion and sebocyte proliferation through TRPV1, 3 and 4 activation, and seems to exert anti-inflammatory effects through A2A adenosine receptors, thus inhibiting the p65 NF-κB pathway [131,132,133]. Conversely, some phytocannabinoids, such as cannabigerol (CBG) and cannabigerovarin (CBGV), trigger an increase in sebum production in human SZ95 sebocytes cell line, possibly due to various affinities for TRP channels and interference with CB receptors [133,134].

A phase 2 trial enrolling over 360 participants and evaluating the effects of a topical cannabinoid named BTX 1503 (a solution made up of 5% CBD as the active ingredient) on acne lesions was recently completed, but the publishing of results is still pending [65,135,136].

4.4. Scleroderma

Localized scleroderma is a complex disease featuring inflammation and fibrosis caused by higher than normal collagen deposition; entailing a decrease in functional T regulatory cells, the inflammation in scleroderma shows a specific profile of increased chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligands 9 and 10 (CXCL9 and CXCL10) expression with a decrease in IL-23 and IL-17A T-helper 17-related cytokines [137,138].

Ajulemic acid has proven safe and effective in improving the clinical status of patients with systemic sclerosis in a Phase 2 trial, quantified by the American College of Rheumatology Combined Response Index in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis; the mechanisms were determined to be related to the reduction of inflammation-related genes expression, ascertained on skin biopsies [139]. An international Phase 3 clinical trial of ajulemic acid in scleroderma was initiated in 2018 [140].

The synthetic cannabinoid WIN 55,212-2 has proven effective in impeding the development of skin fibrosis in bleomycin injected DBA/2J mice by preventing fibroblasts activation, as well as inhibiting growth factors expression, such as TGF-β, platelet-derived growth factor-BB (PDGF-BB) and connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) [141].

Another synthetic cannabinoid, VCE-004.8, has also shown benefits in mouse models of scleroderma, reducing vascular collagen deposits, preventing macrophage infiltration, inhibiting the proliferation and migration of fibroblasts and decreasing overall dermal thickness through mechanisms mediated by CB2 and PPARγ; while CB2 seems to mediate the anti-inflammatory effects, such as reducing macrophage IL-1β secretion and reducing the inflammatory infiltrate, PPARγ seems to exhibit anti-fibrotic effects by inhibiting the TGF-β production through interaction with Smads signaling [78,142,143].

4.5. Dermatomyositis

Dermatomyositis is an inflammatory myopathy, featuring skin rash and erythema followed by typical muscle tissue necrotic and regenerative processes; with a suspected autoimmune component, the inflammation-driven by activation of lymphocytes and dendritic cells increases the production of interferons and complement factors, which further fuels the destructive environment and may also result in vasculopathy [144].

Ajulemic acid, a synthetic cannabinoid with very high CB2 affinity, triggers the release of endogenous eicosanoids and decreases TNF-α, as well as IFN-α and IFN-β production. In an in vitro study on peripheral blood mononuclear cells isolated from dermatomyositis patients this synthetic cannabinoid reduced pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion [140,145]. Following these initial promising results, ajulemic acid has shown to be a safe, tolerable, and efficient drug in hindering the development of inflammation and fibrosis by promoting pro-resolving versus pro-inflammatory lipid mediators, without inducing immunosuppression. Hence this compound is successfully undergoing phase 2 clinical trials for the treatment of dermatomyositis, when administered orally, as capsules [140,146]. Another randomized controlled trial has reported a reduction in Type 1 and 2 IFN levels and T-helper cell inflammation in patients with dermatomyositis treated orally with ajulemic acid for 12 weeks, compared to those receiving placebo [147]. A phase 3 study for testing the efficacy and safety of ajulemic acid in the treatment of dermatomyositis has been launched in 2019 [148].

5. Cannabinoids’ Role in Skin Cancer and Its Associated Inflammation

Skin cancers are a heterogeneous group of diseases, with high prevalence, increasing incidence, potential local and distant complications, and with high mortality rates. Due to their high economic and healthcare impact around the globe, great effort is invested into the research of the physiopathology of these diseases and the development of new and effective treatments [149,150,151,152].

The skin ECS contributes to the regulation of cell differentiation and proliferation through AEA and FAAH that maintain homeostasis through cannabinoid receptor signaling [37,51,124,153]. Both non-melanoma and melanoma skin cancer cells express CB1 and CB2 receptors, alongside other receptors that cannabinoids can activate [154,155]. Cannabinoids have revealed pro-apoptotic and anti-proliferative in various cancers such as prostate, digestive tract and breast carcinomas, with CBD demonstrating the strongest anti-tumor effects [156]. There is a large array of mechanisms that are triggered such as the activation of caspase-3, the increase of Ca2+ concentrations leading to reactive oxygen species (ROS) production stimulation, the induction of apoptosis, reducing the expression of epidermal growth factor (EGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and nerve growth factor (NGF) or their receptors, and inhibiting tumor growth through the AC-cAMP/PKA cascade [157,158]. However, the tumor microenvironment includes an inflammatory component, consisting of leukocytes, cytokines, and various signaling and transcription factors, that aid cancer survival, tumor development, metastasis, and therapy resistance [159]. Among these components, TGF-β can cause immunosuppression and promote tumor growth and survival, TNF-α is involved in cellular transformation, survival, and proliferation, while MMPs can favor tumor invasion through epithelial–mesenchymal transition in many cancers; all these molecules are found in the intersecting pathways of inflammation and carcinogenesis, and cannabinoids can regulate their expression [140,160,161,162,163,164,165,166]. These common anti-inflammatory and anti-carcinogenic effects of cannabinoids make them excellent candidates for cancer treatment, as they act as the immunomodulatory substances that influence cell signaling in the tumor microenvironment.

5.1. Melanoma

The deadliest skin cancer with an increasing incidence, melanoma arises from melanocytes mainly subjected to solar or artificial ultraviolet radiation that induces DNA deterioration and enhances immune suppression [167,168].

THC causes autophagy-dependent apoptosis on melanoma models in vivo and in vitro, and the effects are more potent when CBD is associated, inflicting ROS production and caspase activation, suggesting that the two drugs cooperate in inducing apoptosis via different mechanisms [169]. Other authors suggest that the anti-tumoral effects of CBD may also rely on CB2-mediated anti-inflammatory or immuno-modulating activities [170]. CBD alone was tested for anti-tumoral efficacy in melanoma against Cisplatin when administered intraperitoneally on murine B16F10 melanoma tumors, and even though tumor growth restriction and survival length were better for Cisplatin, the quality of life and movement were better in CBD treated animals [171]. Moreover, the in vivo effects of THC on melanoma have been demonstrated to be CB1 and CB2 mediated. This finding was proven in mouse melanoma tumors using cell lines B16 and HCmel12 in wild type and compared to CB1/2^−/− mice; furthermore, the suppression of tumor growth on transplanted HCmel12 melanomas in mice was correlated with the antagonistic effects on the tumoral inflammatory milieu [172].

In another melanoma mouse model using B16 melanoma cell lines, synthetic cannabinoids WIN-55,212–2 and JWH-133 decreased tumor cell proliferation via Akt inhibition, causing cell cycle arrest, but with no effects on the MAPK/ERK pathway [155].

Endocannabinoids act similarly on melanoma as they do on non-melanoma skin cancers, promoting tumor death through tumor-toxic AEA metabolites subsequent to COX-2-mediated breakdown, in a dose-dependent and receptor-independent manner [173,174,175].

Conversely, the CB1 receptor was identified as having tumor-promoting effects in knockdown models of melanoma, as the CB1-silenced group demonstrated inhibition of ERK and Akt phosphorylation and cell cycle arrest; these findings lead to the hypothesis that CB1 expression alters communication and feedback loops in the endocannabinoid system, mediating the inhibition of migration and proliferation of melanoma cells in vitro [176]. Furthermore, this controversial pro-tumoral effect observed in vitro may stand to prove that the anti-tumoral effects of cannabinoids cited in various in vivo studies rely on impacting the inflammatory milieu, a factor which is improperly represented in in vitro studies [11,172].

5.2. Non-Melanoma Cancers

Squamous cell and basal carcinomas are common malignancies that entail several pitfalls in their treatment such as inadequate skin penetration of chemotherapic drugs and depth-related difficulties in excision [177,178,179,180,181,182]. Systemic application of cannabinoids was proven effective in inducing apoptosis and tumor growth inhibition in vitro and in vivo on PDV.C57 epidermal tumor models. In these models, when using both mixed CB1 and CB2 agonist WIN 55,212-2, but also using CB2 selective agonist JWH-133; the obtained antitumoral effects were the decrease of VEGF, Placental growth factor (PlGF), and Ang2 angiogenic factors expression, impairment of EGF-receptor function with overall reduced blood vessels development and tumoral size regression [52].

Mixed CB1 and CB2 synthetic cannabinoids JWH-018, JWH-122, and JWH-210 demonstrate effective effects in topical application against both carcinogenesis and ear inflammation on a TPA-induced mouse model, hinting at interconnection and interferences between cancer development and inflammation, influenced by CB1 and CB2 [183].

An intrinsic mechanism seems to target non-melanoma skin cancer cells through AEA, which through metabolization by COX-2, becomes an apoptosis-inducing factor; the increase of AEA production appears to amplify the apoptotic results, and the effects are selective towards tumor cells since they express higher levels of COX-2 than surrounding non-tumoral keratinocytes [184,185].

Squamous cell carcinoma may arise under the influence of various biological, physical, or chemical risk factors, such as human papillomavirus infection, ultraviolet radiation exposure, and diverse chemical carcinogens [186,187,188,189,190]. On an ultraviolet B (UVB) irradiation-induced skin carcinogenesis in vivo mouse model, the presence of CB1 and CB2 receptors in wild mice, compared to CB1/2^−/− knockdown mice, has correlated with increased tumorigenesis when benzanthracene was added alongside UVB; furthermore, the CB1/2^+/+ mice had a more prominent inflammation status, with increased TNFα and NF-κB compared to knockdown models, suggesting that CB1 and CB2 receptors are necessary in the pro-inflammatory tumoral response to UVB [191]. However, different cannabinoids may act as either pro- or anti-inflammatory factors, in specific environments and in a dose-dependent manner, due to their complex interferences in the signaling of immune cells [29].

5.3. Kaposi Sarcoma

Kaposi sarcoma is a neoplasm caused by Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV), appearing with higher rates in HIV+ patients, with a broad spectrum of morphology; the spindle cells of primary Kaposi sarcoma express basic fibroblast growth factor in high concentrations under the influence of multiple included inflammatory cytokines, such as TNFα, IL-1, and IFN-γ [192,193].

Recent studies have shown mixed results regarding the effects of cannabinoids on Kaposi sarcoma. Synthetic cannabinoid WIN-55,212-2 is effective in vitro, inducing apoptosis on KS-IMM cell lines derived from Kaposi sarcoma, most likely through increased phosphorylation of ERK 1 and 2 triggering subsequent p38 and JNK activation and also noting promotion of caspase 3 and 6 activity [194]. CBD also induces apoptosis in Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus-infected endothelial cells in vitro by inhibiting viral G protein-coupled receptor (vGPCR) and reducing growth-regulated protein α (GRO-α), VEGF-C and VEGF-receptor 3 levels, thus hindering the tumor cells growth and transformation; GRO-α, a chemokine acting as an agonist for vGPCR, is a key regulator of inflammation, angiogenesis, and tumorigenesis, hinting at an interconnection of these processes in the tumoral environment [195].

Contradictory, another in vitro study showed that THC in low doses acts as a promoter of KSHV, facilitating viral replication through activation of open reading frame 50 (ORF50) protein on primary human dermal microvascular endothelial cells, while also enhancing the viral transmission through increased Platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule (PECAM)-1 expression [196]. These confounding findings may originate in the generated interferences between the potency of agonists on CB1 and CB2 receptors, respectively, and subsequent signaling pathways involved.

Table 2 highlights the roles of cannabinoids in the inflammation processes associated with various skin disorders.

Table 2Summary of the roles of cannabinoids in the inflammation associated with various skin disorders.

Disease	Cannabinoid	Direct anti-Inflammatory Effects	Indirect anti-Inflammatory /Other Effects	Model	Reference
Allergic contact dermatitis	CBD	Inhibition of MCP-2, IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-α	-	HaCaT cells (in vitro)	[111]
	CBD	Inhibition of IL-6, IL-8, IL-17, TNF-α, and IFN-γ	Inhibition of T-cells and B-cells mediated response	Splenocytes (in vitro)	[112]
	α-OOS	PPARs activation, decrease of IFN-γ, CCL2, CCL8 and CXL10	Mast-cells downregulation	Oxazolone mouse model (in vivo)	[115]
Psoriasis	ACEA	-	Inhibition of keratinocyte cell proliferation in situ; decrease of K6 and K16 expression		[81]
Psoriasis	THC and CBD	-	Inhibition of keratinocyte cell proliferation	HPV-16 E6/E7 transformed human skin keratinocytes cultures (in vitro)	[124]
Acne	THC and CBD	-	Inhibition of cyclooxygenase and lipoxygenase	TPA-induced erythema in mice (in vivo)	[127]
	Mixture (Cannabis seeds extract)	Decrease of erythema	Decrease of sebum production	Human volunteers (trial)	[128]
	CBD	Inhibition of the pro-inflammatory p65 NF-κB pathway	-	SZ95 human sebocytes culture (in vitro)	[133]
Scleroderma	Ajulemic acid	Reduction of inflammation-related genes expression	-	Patients with systemic sclerosis (trial)	[139]
	WIN 55,212-2	Inhibition of expression of TGF-β, PDGF-BB and CTGF	Prevention of fibroblasts activation	Bleomycin injected DBA/2J mice (in vivo)	[141]
	VCE-004.8	Reduction of IL-1β secretion, inhibition of TGF-β production	Reduction of macrophage infiltration	Bleomycin-induced dermal fibrosis murine model (in vivo)	[78]
Dermatomyositis	Ajulemic acid	Release of endogenous eicosanoids and decrease of TNF-α, IFN-α and IFN-β production	-	Peripheral blood mononuclear cells isolated from dermatomyositis patients (in vitro)	[145]
	Ajulemic acid	Increased production of pro-resolving vs pro-inflammatory lipid mediators	-	Patients with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (trial)	[146]
	Ajulemic acid	Reduction of Type 1 and 2 interferon levels as well as T-helper cell inflammation	-	Patients with skin-predominant dermatomyositis (trial)	[147]
Melanoma	THC and CBD(Sativex)	ROS production and caspase activation through undetermined mechanism (possibly implying anti-inflammatory effects of CBD)	-	Mice bearing BRAF wild-type melanoma xenografts (in vivo)	[169]
Non-melanoma skin cancer	Undetermined	Decrease of TNFα and NF-κB	-	UVB-induced skin carcinogenesis mouse model (in vivo)	[191]
Kaposi sarcoma	CBD	Reduction of GRO-α	Inhibition of vGPCR and reduction of VEGF-C and VEGFR-3	Kaposi sarcoma–associated herpesvirus-infected endothelial cells (in vitro)	[195]

6. Adverse Effects of Cannabinoids

The medical use of cannabis was introduced in the mid-1990s and has been increasingly permitted in the USA and Europe, however, the procedures of prescription are strict and heavily regulated [197]. Due to the large variety of phyto- and synthetic cannabinoids, as well as different concentrations and methods of administration employed, it is difficult to establish a general safety directive.

A natural blend of phytocannabinoids named Sativex, a spray which includes, among others, THC and CBD, has been tested for long term adverse effects, and while almost all users reported some kind of adverse effect, common adverse effects like dizziness and fatigue were reported in more than 10% of patients, mild and serious adverse effects were also noted, including psychiatric events [198].

A meta-analysis including over 1700 patients with chronic neuropathic pain followed over 2 to 26 weeks after treatment with topical, oral, or inhaled phyto- and/or synthetic cannabinoids noted adverse effects such as confusion, dizziness, and sleepiness that led to a higher rate of study drop out compared to placebo, but the evidence is not considered high-quality so further studies are required to establish the confidence of these findings [199].

An extreme complication of inhaled THC is cannabis-induced arterial disease, comprised of two entities, thromboangiitis obliterans and atheromatosis, especially identified in teenagers [200]. IgE-mediated allergic reactions to phytocannabinoids have also been cited, with various severities, and apparently implying cross-allergies with other plant-based foods or beverages [201].

Reports of skin toxicity related to cannabinoids usage are scarce, the most common cutaneous side effects cited being dry skin, urticaria, or pruritus, but the observations were incidental and mostly related to inhalation or ingestion of cannabinoid products, and not due to local effects of transdermal applications [202,203].

The most severe long-term adverse reactions cited for cannabinoids are the pro-tumor effects. THC has been shown to amplify the expression of KSHV GPCR, unleashing the proliferation of endothelial cells and inducing the apparition of Kaposi sarcoma in vitro, on human cell lines; these effects seem to be dose-dependent [196]. Endocannabinoids may be involved in the neural metastasis of melanoma via the CB1 receptor by similarly stimulating tumor cell migration as neuron migration, as demonstrated in vitro on A375 and 501 Mel melanoma cell lines [176,204].

Hindering therapeutic efficiency of human IgG4 monoclonal antibody Nivolumab is an unwanted action. Troubling results have been obtained in an oncologic study featuring the effectiveness of associating cannabis to the human IgG4 monoclonal antibody Nivolumab in the treatment of various cancers including melanoma, as cannabis decreased the response rate to the treatment, hinting at possible interactions between the therapeutic substances [205].

7. Summary and Future Perspectives

The term cannabinoid encompasses a large number of substances with different, and sometimes opposite effects on inflammatory processes in the skin. Strong evidence that some compounds have great results in specific conditions is now available. The underlying mechanisms involved in mediating the effects of cannabinoids on various inflammatory conditions, including their implication in the inflammatory milieu of different cutaneous tumors have been discussed in this paper.

Synthetic cannabinoids demonstrate great potential as new and improved formulas are developed and tested. There seems to be a correlation between anti-inflammatory and anti-carcinogenic potency, and as more cannabinoids undergo trials, an enhancement of effectiveness is expected [183].

While policies, regimes and legal limitations partly impede publishing and prescribing medical-cannabis products, the interest in this field is rising as more evidence of the effectiveness of these substances becomes available, and the use of cannabinoids in the treatment of skin disorders may become conventional in the future [206].

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Monica Neagu (‘Victor Babes’ National Institute of Pathology, Bucharest) for fruitful discussions, helpful comments and suggestions.

Author Contributions

C.S. and C.C. (Constantin Caruntu) contributed to the conception of this article and performed the preliminary documentation. C.S., I.A.B., L.-G.M., A.-E.S., D.O.C., C.C. (Carolina Constantin), D.C., C.C. (Constantin Caruntu), R.S.C. and A.C. were responsible for the selection and analysis of the data as well as the manuscript drafting and writing of the paper. C.S., C.C. (Constantin Caruntu), R.S.C. and A.C. have revised critically the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research and APC were funded by a grant of the Romanian Ministry of Research and Innovation, CCCDI-UEFISCDI, [project number 61PCCDI⁄2018 PN-III-P1-1.2-PCCDI-2017-0341], within PNCDI-III.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

Untitled section

References

1.Andre C.M., Hausman J.-F., Guerriero G. Cannabis sativa: The Plant of the Thousand and One Molecules. Front. Plant Sci. 2016;7:19. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00019.
2.Allan G.M., Finley C.R., Ton J., Perry D., Ramji J., Crawford K., Lindblad A.J., Korownyk C., Kolber M.R. Systematic review of systematic reviews for medical cannabinoids: Pain, nausea and vomiting, spasticity, and harms. Can. Fam. Physician. 2018;64:e78–e94.
3.Papaseit E., Pérez-Mañá C., Pérez-Acevedo A.P., Hladun O., Torres-Moreno M.C., Muga R., Torrens M., Farré M. Cannabinoids: From pot to lab. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2018;15:1286–1295. doi: 10.7150/ijms.27087.
4.Klumpers L.E., Beumer T.L., van Hasselt J.G., Lipplaa A., Karger L.B., Kleinloog H.D., Freijer J.I., de Kam M.L., van Gerven J.M. Novel Delta(9) -tetrahydrocannabinol formulation Namisol(R) has beneficial pharmacokinetics and promising pharmacodynamic effects. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2012;74:42–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04164.x.
5.Perucca E. Cannabinoids in the Treatment of Epilepsy: Hard Evidence at Last? J. Epilepsy Res. 2017;7:61–76. doi: 10.14581/jer.17012.
6.Gofshteyn J.S., Wilfong A., Devinsky O., Bluvstein J., Charuta J., Ciliberto M.A., Laux L., Marsh E.D. Cannabidiol as a Potential Treatment for Febrile Infection-Related Epilepsy Syndrome (FIRES) in the Acute and Chronic Phases. J. Child Neurol. 2017;32:35–40. doi: 10.1177/0883073816669450.
7.Theunissen E.L., Hutten N., Mason N.L., Toennes S.W., Kuypers K.P.C., de Sousa Fernandes Perna E.B., Ramaekers J.G. Neurocognition and subjective experience following acute doses of the synthetic cannabinoid JWH-018: A phase 1, placebo-controlled, pilot study. Br. J. Pharm. 2018;175:18–28. doi: 10.1111/bph.14066.
8.Hill M.N., Campolongo P., Yehuda R., Patel S. Integrating Endocannabinoid Signaling and Cannabinoids into the Biology and Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018;43:80–102. doi: 10.1038/npp.2017.162.
9.McAllister S.D., Soroceanu L., Desprez P.-Y. The Antitumor Activity of Plant-Derived Non-Psychoactive Cannabinoids. J. Neuroimmune Pharmacol. Off. J. Soc. Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2015;10:255–267. doi: 10.1007/s11481-015-9608-y.
10.Dariš B., Tancer Verboten M., Knez Ž., Ferk P. Cannabinoids in cancer treatment: Therapeutic potential and legislation. Bosn. J. Basic Med. Sci. 2019;19:14–23. doi: 10.17305/bjbms.2018.3532.
11.Milando R., Friedman A. Cannabinoids: Potential Role in Inflammatory and Neoplastic Skin Diseases. Am. J. Clin. Derm. 2019;20:167–180. doi: 10.1007/s40257-018-0410-5.
12.The Health Effects of Cannabis and Cannabinoids: The Current State of Evidence and Recommendations for Research. National Academies Press (US); Washington, DC, USA: 2017. National Academies of Sciences-Committee on the Health Effects of Marijuana: An Evidence, The National Academies Collection: Reports funded by National Institutes of Health.
13.Cronin K.A., Lake A.J., Scott S., Sherman R.L., Noone A.-M., Howlader N., Henley S.J., Anderson R.N., Firth A.U., Ma J., et al. Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, part I: National cancer statistics. Cancer. 2018;124:2785–2800. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31551.
14.Śledziński P., Zeyland J., Słomski R., Nowak A. The current state and future perspectives of cannabinoids in cancer biology. Cancer Med. 2018;7:765–775. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1312.
15.Pellati F., Borgonetti V., Brighenti V., Biagi M., Benvenuti S., Corsi L. Cannabis sativa L. and Nonpsychoactive Cannabinoids: Their Chemistry and Role against Oxidative Stress, Inflammation, and Cancer. Biomed Res. Int. 2018;2018:1691428. doi: 10.1155/2018/1691428.
16.Zgair A., Lee J.B., Wong J.C.M., Taha D.A., Aram J., Di Virgilio D., McArthur J.W., Cheng Y.-K., Hennig I.M., Barrett D.A., et al. Oral administration of cannabis with lipids leads to high levels of cannabinoids in the intestinal lymphatic system and prominent immunomodulation. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:14542. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15026-z.
17.Niaz K., Khan F., Maqbool F., Momtaz S., Ismail Hassan F., Nobakht-Haghighi N., Rahimifard M., Abdollahi M. Endo-cannabinoids system and the toxicity of cannabinoids with a biotechnological approach. EXCLI J. 2017;16:688–711. doi: 10.17179/excli2017-257.
18.Nagarkatti P., Pandey R., Rieder S.A., Hegde V.L., Nagarkatti M. Cannabinoids as novel anti-inflammatory drugs. Future Med. Chem. 2009;1:1333–1349. doi: 10.4155/fmc.09.93.
19.Alhamoruni A., Wright K.L., Larvin M., O’Sullivan S.E. Cannabinoids mediate opposing effects on inflammation-induced intestinal permeability. Br. J. Pharm. 2012;165:2598–2610. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01589.x.
20.Russo C., Ferk F., Mišík M., Ropek N., Nersesyan A., Mejri D., Holzmann K., Lavorgna M., Isidori M., Knasmüller S. Low doses of widely consumed cannabinoids (cannabidiol and cannabidivarin) cause DNA damage and chromosomal aberrations in human-derived cells. Arch. Toxicol. 2019;93:179–188. doi: 10.1007/s00204-018-2322-9.
21.Ewing L.E., Skinner C.M., Quick C.M., Kennon-McGill S., McGill M.R., Walker L.A., ElSohly M.A., Gurley B.J., Koturbash I. Hepatotoxicity of a Cannabidiol-Rich Cannabis Extract in the Mouse Model. Molecules. 2019;24:1694. doi: 10.3390/molecules24091694.
22.Burstein S.H., Zurier R.B. Cannabinoids, endocannabinoids, and related analogs in inflammation. AAPS J. 2009;11:109–119. doi: 10.1208/s12248-009-9084-5.
23.Sarne Y., Asaf F., Fishbein M., Gafni M., Keren O. The dual neuroprotective-neurotoxic profile of cannabinoid drugs. Br. J. Pharm. 2011;163:1391–1401. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01280.x.
24.Gu Z., Singh S., Niyogi R.G., Lamont G.J., Wang H., Lamont R.J., Scott D.A. Marijuana-Derived Cannabinoids Trigger a CB2/PI3K Axis of Suppression of the Innate Response to Oral Pathogens. Front. Immunol. 2019;10:2288. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02288.
25.Fujii M., Sherchan P., Soejima Y., Hasegawa Y., Flores J., Doycheva D., Zhang J.H. Cannabinoid receptor type 2 agonist attenuates apoptosis by activation of phosphorylated CREB-Bcl-2 pathway after subarachnoid hemorrhage in rats. Exp. Neurol. 2014;261:396–403. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2014.07.005.
26.Hohmann U., Pelzer M., Kleine J., Hohmann T., Ghadban C., Dehghani F. Opposite Effects of Neuroprotective Cannabinoids, Palmitoylethanolamide, and 2-Arachidonoylglycerol on Function and Morphology of Microglia. Front. Neurosci. 2019;13:1180. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.01180.
27.Freimuth N., Ramer R., Hinz B. Antitumorigenic effects of cannabinoids beyond apoptosis. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2010;332:336–344. doi: 10.1124/jpet.109.157735.
28.Marks D.H., Friedman A. The Therapeutic Potential of Cannabinoids in Dermatology. Ski. Ther. Lett. 2018;23:1–5.
29.Klein T.W. Cannabinoid-based drugs as anti-inflammatory therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2005;5:400–411. doi: 10.1038/nri1602.
30.Lu H.-C., Mackie K. An Introduction to the Endogenous Cannabinoid System. Biol. Psychiatry. 2016;79:516–525. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.07.028.
31.Diao X., Huestis M.A. New Synthetic Cannabinoids Metabolism and Strategies to Best Identify Optimal Marker Metabolites. Front. Chem. 2019;7:109. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2019.00109.
32.Howlett A.C., Barth F., Bonner T.I., Cabral G., Casellas P., Devane W.A., Felder C.C., Herkenham M., Mackie K., Martin B.R., et al. International Union of Pharmacology. XXVII. Classification of cannabinoid receptors. Pharmacol. Rev. 2002;54:161–202. doi: 10.1124/pr.54.2.161.
33.Thakur G.A., Nikas S.P., Makriyannis A. CB1 cannabinoid receptor ligands. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2005;5:631–640. doi: 10.2174/1389557054368772.
34.Prenderville J.A., Kelly Á.M., Downer E.J. The role of cannabinoids in adult neurogenesis. Br. J. Pharm. 2015;172:3950–3963. doi: 10.1111/bph.13186.
35.Mackie K. Distribution of cannabinoid receptors in the central and peripheral nervous system. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 2005:299–325. doi: 10.1007/3-540-26573-2_10.
36.Katona I., Sperlágh B., Sík A., Käfalvi A., Vizi E.S., Mackie K., Freund T.F. Presynaptically located CB1 cannabinoid receptors regulate GABA release from axon terminals of specific hippocampal interneurons. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 1999;19:4544–4558. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-11-04544.1999.
37.Maccarrone M., Bab I., Bíró T., Cabral G.A., Dey S.K., Di Marzo V., Konje J.C., Kunos G., Mechoulam R., Pacher P., et al. Endocannabinoid signaling at the periphery: 50 years after THC. Trends Pharm. Sci. 2015;36:277–296. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2015.02.008.
38.Gong J.P., Onaivi E.S., Ishiguro H., Liu Q.R., Tagliaferro P.A., Brusco A., Uhl G.R. Cannabinoid CB2 receptors: Immunohistochemical localization in rat brain. Brain Res. 2006;1071:10–23. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.11.035.
39.Evens N., Vandeputte C., Coolen C., Janssen P., Sciot R., Baekelandt V., Verbruggen A.M., Debyser Z., Van Laere K., Bormans G.M. Preclinical evaluation of [11C]NE40, a type 2 cannabinoid receptor PET tracer. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2012;39:389–399. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2011.09.005.
40.Di Marzo V., Breivogel C.S., Tao Q., Bridgen D.T., Razdan R.K., Zimmer A.M., Zimmer A., Martin B.R. Levels, metabolism, and pharmacological activity of anandamide in CB(1) cannabinoid receptor knockout mice: Evidence for non-CB(1), non-CB(2) receptor-mediated actions of anandamide in mouse brain. J. Neurochem. 2000;75:2434–2444. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2000.0752434.x.
41.Wagner J.A., Varga K., Jarai Z., Kunos G. Mesenteric vasodilation mediated by endothelial anandamide receptors. Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. 1979) 1999;33:429–434. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.33.1.429.
42.De Petrocellis L., Di Marzo V. Non-CB1, non-CB2 receptors for endocannabinoids, plant cannabinoids, and synthetic cannabimimetics: Focus on G-protein-coupled receptors and transient receptor potential channels. J. Neuroimmune Pharmacol. Off. J. Soc. Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2010;5:103–121. doi: 10.1007/s11481-009-9177-z.
43.Pertwee R.G., Howlett A.C., Abood M.E., Alexander S.P.H., Di Marzo V., Elphick M.R., Greasley P.J., Hansen H.S., Kunos G., Mackie K., et al. International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. LXXIX. Cannabinoid receptors and their ligands: Beyond CB₁ and CB₂. Pharmacol. Rev. 2010;62:588–631. doi: 10.1124/pr.110.003004.
44.Morales P., Reggio P.H. An Update on Non-CB1, Non-CB2 Cannabinoid Related G-Protein-Coupled Receptors. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2017;2:265–273. doi: 10.1089/can.2017.0036.
45.Morales P., Hurst D.P., Reggio P.H. Molecular Targets of the Phytocannabinoids: A Complex Picture. Prog. Chem. Org. Nat. Prod. 2017;103:103–131. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-45541-9_4.
46.Río C.d., Millán E., García V., Appendino G., DeMesa J., Muñoz E. The endocannabinoid system of the skin. A potential approach for the treatment of skin disorders. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2018;157:122–133. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2018.08.022.
47.Garcia-Gonzalez E., Selvi E., Balistreri E., Lorenzini S., Maggio R., Natale M.R., Capecchi P.L., Lazzerini P.E., Bardelli M., Laghi-Pasini F., et al. Cannabinoids inhibit fibrogenesis in diffuse systemic sclerosis fibroblasts. Rheumatology. 2009;48:1050–1056. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kep189.
48.Stander S., Schmelz M., Metze D., Luger T., Rukwied R. Distribution of cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1) and 2 (CB2) on sensory nerve fibers and adnexal structures in human skin. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2005;38:177–188. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2005.01.007.
49.Maccarrone M., Di Rienzo M., Battista N., Gasperi V., Guerrieri P., Rossi A., Finazzi-Agro A. The endocannabinoid system in human keratinocytes. Evidence that anandamide inhibits epidermal differentiation through CB1 receptor-dependent inhibition of protein kinase C, activation protein-1, and transglutaminase. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:33896–33903. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M303994200.
50.Pucci M., Pasquariello N., Battista N., Di Tommaso M., Rapino C., Fezza F., Zuccolo M., Jourdain R., Finazzi Agro A., Breton L., et al. Endocannabinoids stimulate human melanogenesis via type-1 cannabinoid receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 2012;287:15466–15478. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.314880.
51.Roche R., Hoareau L., Bes-Houtmann S., Gonthier M.P., Laborde C., Baron J.F., Haffaf Y., Cesari M., Festy F. Presence of the cannabinoid receptors, CB1 and CB2, in human omental and subcutaneous adipocytes. Histochem. Cell Biol. 2006;126:177–187. doi: 10.1007/s00418-005-0127-4.
52.Casanova M.L., Blázquez C., Martínez-Palacio J., Villanueva C., Fernández-Aceñero M.J., Huffman J.W., Jorcano J.L., Guzmán M. Inhibition of skin tumor growth and angiogenesis in vivo by activation of cannabinoid receptors. J. Clin. Investig. 2003;111:43–50. doi: 10.1172/JCI200316116.
53.Atoyan R., Shander D., Botchkareva N.V. Non-neuronal expression of transient receptor potential type A1 (TRPA1) in human skin. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2009;129:2312–2315. doi: 10.1038/jid.2009.58.
54.Bodo E., Kovacs I., Telek A., Varga A., Paus R., Kovacs L., Biro T. Vanilloid receptor-1 (VR1) is widely expressed on various epithelial and mesenchymal cell types of human skin. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2004;123:410–413. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-202X.2004.23209.x.
55.Stander S., Moormann C., Schumacher M., Buddenkotte J., Artuc M., Shpacovitch V., Brzoska T., Lippert U., Henz B.M., Luger T.A., et al. Expression of vanilloid receptor subtype 1 in cutaneous sensory nerve fibers, mast cells, and epithelial cells of appendage structures. Exp. Dermatol. 2004;13:129–139. doi: 10.1111/j.0906-6705.2004.0178.x.
56.Caterina M.J. TRP channel cannabinoid receptors in skin sensation, homeostasis, and inflammation. Acs Chem. Neurosci. 2014;5:1107–1116. doi: 10.1021/cn5000919.
57.Freund T.F., Katona I., Piomelli D. Role of endogenous cannabinoids in synaptic signaling. Physiol. Rev. 2003;83:1017–1066. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00004.2003.
58.Fride E., Mechoulam R. Pharmacological activity of the cannabinoid receptor agonist, anandamide, a brain constituent. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1993;231:313–314. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(93)90468-W.
59.Muccioli G.G., Xu C., Odah E., Cudaback E., Cisneros J.A., Lambert D.M., Lopez Rodriguez M.L., Bajjalieh S., Stella N. Identification of a novel endocannabinoid-hydrolyzing enzyme expressed by microglial cells. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 2007;27:2883–2889. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4830-06.2007.
60.Yu M., Ives D., Ramesha C.S. Synthesis of prostaglandin E2 ethanolamide from anandamide by cyclooxygenase-2. J. Biol. Chem. 1997;272:21181–21186. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.34.21181.
61.Grotenhermen F. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cannabinoids. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 2003;42:327–360. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200342040-00003.
62.Laprairie R.B., Bagher A.M., Kelly M.E.M., Denovan-Wright E.M. Cannabidiol is a negative allosteric modulator of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor. Br. J. Pharm. 2015;172:4790–4805. doi: 10.1111/bph.13250.
63.Thomas A., Baillie G.L., Phillips A.M., Razdan R.K., Ross R.A., Pertwee R.G. Cannabidiol displays unexpectedly high potency as an antagonist of CB1 and CB2 receptor agonists in vitro. Br. J. Pharm. 2007;150:613–623. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707133.
64.Davies C., Bhattacharyya S. Cannabidiol as a potential treatment for psychosis. Adv. Psychopharmacol. 2019;9:2045125319881916. doi: 10.1177/2045125319881916.
65.Tóth K.F., Ádám D., Bíró T., Oláh A. Cannabinoid Signaling in the Skin: Therapeutic Potential of the “C(ut)annabinoid” System. Molecules. 2019;24:918. doi: 10.3390/molecules24050918.
66.Zakany N., Olah A., Markovics A., Takacs E., Aranyasz A., Nicolussi S., Piscitelli F., Allara M., Por A., Kovacs I., et al. Endocannabinoid Tone Regulates Human Sebocyte Biology. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2018;138:1699–1706. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2018.02.022.
67.Sirrs S., van Karnebeek C.D., Peng X., Shyr C., Tarailo-Graovac M., Mandal R., Testa D., Dubin D., Carbonetti G., Glynn S.E., et al. Defects in fatty acid amide hydrolase 2 in a male with neurologic and psychiatric symptoms. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2015;10:38. doi: 10.1186/s13023-015-0248-3.
68.Maccarrone M., Fiorucci L., Erba F., Bari M., Finazzi-Agro A., Ascoli F. Human mast cells take up and hydrolyze anandamide under the control of 5-lipoxygenase and do not express cannabinoid receptors. FEBS Lett. 2000;468:176–180. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(00)01223-0.
69.Bíró T., Tóth B.I., Haskó G., Paus R., Pacher P. The endocannabinoid system of the skin in health and disease: Novel perspectives and therapeutic opportunities. Trends Pharm. Sci. 2009;30:411–420. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2009.05.004.
70.Srivastava B.K., Soni R., Patel J.Z., Joharapurkar A., Sadhwani N., Kshirsagar S., Mishra B., Takale V., Gupta S., Pandya P., et al. Hair growth stimulator property of thienyl substituted pyrazole carboxamide derivatives as a CB1 receptor antagonist with in vivo antiobesity effect. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009;19:2546–2550. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2009.03.046.
71.Stander S., Reinhardt H.W., Luger T.A. Topical cannabinoid agonists. An effective new possibility for treating chronic pruritus. Hautarzt Z. Dermatol. Venerol. Verwandte Geb. 2006;57:801–807. doi: 10.1007/s00105-006-1180-1.
72.Walker J.M., Hohmann A.G. Cannabinoid mechanisms of pain suppression. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 2005:509–554. doi: 10.1007/3-540-26573-2_17.
73.Reggio P.H. Endocannabinoid binding to the cannabinoid receptors: What is known and what remains unknown. Curr. Med. Chem. 2010;17:1468–1486. doi: 10.2174/092986710790980005.
74.Navarro G., Varani K., Reyes-Resina I., Sánchez de Medina V., Rivas-Santisteban R., Sánchez-Carnerero Callado C., Vincenzi F., Casano S., Ferreiro-Vera C., Canela E.I., et al. Cannabigerol Action at Cannabinoid CB(1) and CB(2) Receptors and at CB(1)-CB(2) Heteroreceptor Complexes. Front. Pharmacol. 2018;9:632. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00632.
75.Tepper M.A., Zurier R.B., Burstein S.H. Ultrapure ajulemic acid has improved CB2 selectivity with reduced CB1 activity. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2014;22:3245–3251. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2014.04.062.
76.Marusich J.A., Wiley J.L., Lefever T.W., Patel P.R., Thomas B.F. Finding order in chemical chaos—Continuing characterization of synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists. Neuropharmacology. 2018;134:73–81. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2017.10.041.
77.Navarrete C., Carrillo-Salinas F., Palomares B., Mecha M., Jiménez-Jiménez C., Mestre L., Feliú A., Bellido M.L., Fiebich B.L., Appendino G., et al. Hypoxia mimetic activity of VCE-004.8, a cannabidiol quinone derivative: Implications for multiple sclerosis therapy. J. Neuroinflammation. 2018;15:64. doi: 10.1186/s12974-018-1103-y.
78.del Rio C., Navarrete C., Collado J.A., Bellido M.L., Gomez-Canas M., Pazos M.R., Fernandez-Ruiz J., Pollastro F., Appendino G., Calzado M.A., et al. The cannabinoid quinol VCE-004.8 alleviates bleomycin-induced scleroderma and exerts potent antifibrotic effects through peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma and CB2 pathways. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:21703. doi: 10.1038/srep21703.
79.Pertwee R.G. Cannabinoid receptor ligands: Clinical and neuropharmacological considerations, relevant to future drug discovery and development. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs. 2000;9:1553–1571. doi: 10.1517/13543784.9.7.1553.
80.Huffman J.W. CB2 receptor ligands. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2005;5:641–649. doi: 10.2174/1389557054368844.
81.Ramot Y., Sugawara K., Zakany N., Toth B.I., Biro T., Paus R. A novel control of human keratin expression: Cannabinoid receptor 1-mediated signaling down-regulates the expression of keratins K6 and K16 in human keratinocytes in vitro and in situ. PeerJ. 2013;1:e40. doi: 10.7717/peerj.40.
82.Han S., Thatte J., Buzard D.J., Jones R.M. Therapeutic utility of cannabinoid receptor type 2 (CB(2)) selective agonists. J. Med. Chem. 2013;56:8224–8256. doi: 10.1021/jm4005626.
83.Rahman A., Choudhary M.I., Reitz A.B. Frontiers in Medicinal Chemistry, Volume (4) Bentham Science Publishers; Oak Park, IL, USA: 2010.
84.Chovatiya R., Silverberg J.I. Pathophysiology of Atopic Dermatitis and Psoriasis: Implications for Management in Children. Children. 2019;6:108. doi: 10.3390/children6100108.
85.Balkwill F., Coussens L.M. An inflammatory link. Nature. 2004;431:405–406. doi: 10.1038/431405a.
86.Neagu M., Constantin C., Caruntu C., Dumitru C., Surcel M., Zurac S. Inflammation: A key process in skin tumorigenesis. Oncol. Lett. 2019;17:4068–4084. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.9735.
87.Maru G.B., Gandhi K., Ramchandani A., Kumar G. The role of inflammation in skin cancer. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2014;816:437–469. doi: 10.1007/978-3-0348-0837-8_17.
88.Surcel M., Constantin C., Caruntu C., Zurac S., Neagu M. Inflammatory Cytokine Pattern Is Sex-Dependent in Mouse Cutaneous Melanoma Experimental Model. J. Immunol. Res. 2017;2017:10. doi: 10.1155/2017/9212134.
89.Wright T.I., Spencer J.M., Flowers F.P. Chemoprevention of nonmelanoma skin cancer. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2006;54:933–946. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2005.08.062.
90.Roosterman D., Goerge T., Schneider S.W., Bunnett N.W., Steinhoff M. Neuronal control of skin function: The skin as a neuroimmunoendocrine organ. Physiol. Rev. 2006;86:1309–1379. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00026.2005.
91.Caruntu C., Negrei C., Ilie Ghita M., Caruntu A., Bădărău A., ioan Buraga I.B., Boda D., Albu A., Brănişteanu D. Capsaicin, a hot topic in skin pharmacology and physiology. Farmacia. 2015;63:487–491.
92.Caruntu C., Boda D., Musat S., Caruntu A., Mandache E. Stress-induced mast cell activation in glabrous and hairy skin. Mediat. Inflamm. 2014;2014:105950. doi: 10.1155/2014/105950.
93.Filippi A., Caruntu C., Gheorghe R.O., Deftu A., Amuzescu B., Ristoiu V. Catecholamines reduce transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 desensitization in cultured dorsal root ganglia neurons. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. Off. J. Pol. Physiol. Soc. 2016;67:843–850.
94.Caruntu C., Boda D. Evaluation through in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy of the cutaneous neurogenic inflammatory reaction induced by capsaicin in human subjects. J. Biomed. Opt. 2012;17:085003. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.17.8.085003.
95.Căruntu C., Grigore C., Căruntu A., Diaconeasa A., Boda D. The role of stress in skin diseases. Intern. Med. (Tokyojapan) 2011;8:73–84.
96.Ilie M.A., Caruntu C., Tampa M., Georgescu S.R., Matei C., Negrei C., Ion R.M., Constantin C., Neagu M., Boda D. Capsaicin: Physicochemical properties, cutaneous reactions and potential applications in painful and inflammatory conditions. Exp. Med. 2019;18:916–925. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.7513.
97.Scheau C., Badarau I.A., Caruntu C., Mihai G.L., Didilescu A.C., Constantin C., Neagu M. Capsaicin: Effects on the Pathogenesis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Molecules. 2019;24:2350. doi: 10.3390/molecules24132350.
98.Georgescu S.R., Sarbu M.I., Matei C., Ilie M.A., Caruntu C., Constantin C., Neagu M., Tampa M. Capsaicin: Friend or Foe in Skin Cancer and Other Related Malignancies? Nutrients. 2017;9:1365. doi: 10.3390/nu9121365.
99.Downer E.J. Cannabinoids and innate immunity: Taking a toll on neuroinflammation. Sci. World J. 2011;11:855–865. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2011.84.
100.Sanclemente G., Burgos C., Nova J., Hernandez F., Gonzalez C., Reyes M.I., Cordoba N., Arevalo A., Melendez E., Colmenares J., et al. The impact of skin diseases on quality of life: A multicenter study. Actas Dermo-Sifiliogr. 2017;108:244–252. doi: 10.1016/j.ad.2016.11.008.
101.Gieler U., Gieler T., Kupfer J.P. Acne and quality of life—Impact and management. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. Jeadv. 2015;29(Suppl. 4):12–14. doi: 10.1111/jdv.13191.
102.Klimas N.K., Shedd A.D., Bernstein I.H., Jacobe H. Health-related quality of life in morphoea. Br. J. Dermatol. 2015;172:1329–1337. doi: 10.1111/bjd.13572.
103.Jin H., He R., Oyoshi M., Geha R.S. Animal models of atopic dermatitis. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2009;129:31–40. doi: 10.1038/jid.2008.106.
104.Chuang S.Y., Lin C.H., Sung C.T., Fang J.Y. Murine models of psoriasis and their usefulness for drug discovery. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2018;13:551–562. doi: 10.1080/17460441.2018.1463214.
105.Shin T.-H., Kim H.-S., Choi S.W., Kang K.-S. Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy for Inflammatory Skin Diseases: Clinical Potential and Mode of Action. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017;18:244. doi: 10.3390/ijms18020244.
106.Huestis M.A. Human cannabinoid pharmacokinetics. Chem. Biodivers. 2007;4:1770–1804. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.200790152.
107.Stinchcomb A.L., Valiveti S., Hammell D.C., Ramsey D.R. Human skin permeation of Delta8-tetrahydrocannabinol, cannabidiol and cannabinol. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2004;56:291–297. doi: 10.1211/0022357022791.
108.Bruni N., Della Pepa C., Oliaro-Bosso S., Pessione E., Gastaldi D., Dosio F. Cannabinoid Delivery Systems for Pain and Inflammation Treatment. Molecules. 2018;23:2478. doi: 10.3390/molecules23102478.
109.Novak-Bilić G., Vučić M., Japundžić I., Meštrović-Štefekov J., Stanić-Duktaj S., Lugović-Mihić L. Irritant and Allergic Contact Dermatitis—Skin Lesion Characteristics. Acta Clin. Croat. 2018;57:713–720. doi: 10.20471/acc.2018.57.04.13.
110.Corsini E., Engin A.B., Neagu M., Galbiati V., Nikitovic D., Tzanakakis G., Tsatsakis A.M. Chemical-induced contact allergy: From mechanistic understanding to risk prevention. Arch. Toxicol. 2018;92:3031–3050. doi: 10.1007/s00204-018-2283-z.
111.Petrosino S., Verde R., Vaia M., Allara M., Iuvone T., Di Marzo V. Anti-inflammatory Properties of Cannabidiol, a Nonpsychotropic Cannabinoid, in Experimental Allergic Contact Dermatitis. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2018;365:652–663. doi: 10.1124/jpet.117.244368.
112.Kozela E., Juknat A., Kaushansky N., Ben-Nun A., Coppola G., Vogel Z. Cannabidiol, a non-psychoactive cannabinoid, leads to EGR2-dependent anergy in activated encephalitogenic T cells. J. Neuroinflammation. 2015;12:52. doi: 10.1186/s12974-015-0273-0.
113.Harvey B.S., Sia T.C., Wattchow D.A., Smid S.D. Interleukin 17A evoked mucosal damage is attenuated by cannabidiol and anandamide in a human colonic explant model. Cytokine. 2014;65:236–244. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2013.10.006.
114.De Filippis D., Esposito G., Cirillo C., Cipriano M., De Winter B.Y., Scuderi C., Sarnelli G., Cuomo R., Steardo L., De Man J.G., et al. Cannabidiol reduces intestinal inflammation through the control of neuroimmune axis. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e28159. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028159.
115.Kim H.J., Kim B., Park B.M., Jeon J.E., Lee S.H., Mann S., Ahn S.K., Hong S.P., Jeong S.K. Topical cannabinoid receptor 1 agonist attenuates the cutaneous inflammatory responses in oxazolone-induced atopic dermatitis model. Int. J. Dermatol. 2015;54:e401–e408. doi: 10.1111/ijd.12841.
116.Gaffal E., Cron M., Glodde N., Tuting T. Anti-inflammatory activity of topical THC in DNFB-mediated mouse allergic contact dermatitis independent of CB1 and CB2 receptors. Allergy. 2013;68:994–1000. doi: 10.1111/all.12183.
117.Basu S., Dittel B.N. Unraveling the complexities of cannabinoid receptor 2 (CB2) immune regulation in health and disease. Immunol. Res. 2011;51:26–38. doi: 10.1007/s12026-011-8210-5.
118.Karsak M., Gaffal E., Date R., Wang-Eckhardt L., Rehnelt J., Petrosino S., Starowicz K., Steuder R., Schlicker E., Cravatt B., et al. Attenuation of allergic contact dermatitis through the endocannabinoid system. Science. 2007;316:1494–1497. doi: 10.1126/science.1142265.
119.Silfvast-Kaiser A.S., Homan K.B., Mansouri B. A narrative review of psoriasis and multiple sclerosis: Links and risks. Psoriasis. 2019;9:81–90. doi: 10.2147/PTT.S186637.
120.Caruntu C., Boda D., Dumitrascu G., Constantin C., Neagu M. Proteomics focusing on immune markers in psoriatic arthritis. Biomark. Med. 2015;9:513–528. doi: 10.2217/bmm.14.76.
121.Batani A., Branisteanu D.E., Ilie M.A., Boda D., Ianosi S., Ianosi G., Caruntu C. Assessment of dermal papillary and microvascular parameters in psoriasis vulgaris using in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy. Exp. Med. 2018;15:1241–1246. doi: 10.3892/etm.2017.5542.
122.Caruntu C., Boda D., Caruntu A., Rotaru M., Baderca F., Zurac S. In vivo imaging techniques for psoriatic lesions. Rom. J. Morphol. Embryol. = Rev. Roum. De Morphol. Et Embryol. 2014;55:1191–1196.
123.Sheriff T., Lin M.J., Dubin D., Khorasani H. The potential role of cannabinoids in dermatology. J. Dermatol. Treat. 2019:1–7. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2019.1675854.
124.Wilkinson J.D., Williamson E.M. Cannabinoids inhibit human keratinocyte proliferation through a non-CB1/CB2 mechanism and have a potential therapeutic value in the treatment of psoriasis. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2007;45:87–92. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2006.10.009.
125.Changoer L., Anastassov G. Patent No: 20190060250 (METHOD TO TREAT PSORIASIS) AXIM Biotechnologies, Inc. (New York, NY, US) [(accessed on 22 January 2020)];2019 Available online: http://www.freepatentsonline.com/y2019/0060250.html.
126.Gollnick H.P., Zouboulis C.C. Not all acne is acne vulgaris. Dtsch. Arztebl. Int. 2014;111:301–312. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2014.0301.
127.Formukong E.A., Evans A.T., Evans F.J. Analgesic and antiinflammatory activity of constituents of Cannabis sativa L. Inflammation. 1988;12:361–371. doi: 10.1007/BF00915771.
128.Ali A., Akhtar N. The safety and efficacy of 3% Cannabis seeds extract cream for reduction of human cheek skin sebum and erythema content. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 2015;28:1389–1395.
129.Dobrosi N., Toth B.I., Nagy G., Dozsa A., Geczy T., Nagy L., Zouboulis C.C., Paus R., Kovacs L., Biro T. Endocannabinoids enhance lipid synthesis and apoptosis of human sebocytes via cannabinoid receptor-2-mediated signaling. Faseb J. Off. Publ. Fed. Am. Soc. Exp. Biol. 2008;22:3685–3695. doi: 10.1096/fj.07-104877.
130.Olah A., Markovics A., Szabo-Papp J., Szabo P.T., Stott C., Zouboulis C.C., Biro T. Differential effectiveness of selected non-psychotropic phytocannabinoids on human sebocyte functions implicates their introduction in dry/seborrhoeic skin and acne treatment. Exp. Dermatol. 2016;25:701–707. doi: 10.1111/exd.13042.
131.Toth B.I., Geczy T., Griger Z., Dozsa A., Seltmann H., Kovacs L., Nagy L., Zouboulis C.C., Paus R., Biro T. Transient receptor potential vanilloid-1 signaling as a regulator of human sebocyte biology. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2009;129:329–339. doi: 10.1038/jid.2008.258.
132.De Petrocellis L., Orlando P., Moriello A.S., Aviello G., Stott C., Izzo A.A., Di Marzo V. Cannabinoid actions at TRPV channels: Effects on TRPV3 and TRPV4 and their potential relevance to gastrointestinal inflammation. Acta Physiol. (Oxf. Engl.) 2012;204:255–266. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.2011.02338.x.
133.Oláh A., Tóth B.I., Borbíró I., Sugawara K., Szöllõsi A.G., Czifra G., Pál B., Ambrus L., Kloepper J., Camera E., et al. Cannabidiol exerts sebostatic and antiinflammatory effects on human sebocytes. J. Clin. Investig. 2014;124:3713–3724. doi: 10.1172/JCI64628.
134.De Petrocellis L., Ligresti A., Moriello A.S., Allarà M., Bisogno T., Petrosino S., Stott C.G., Di Marzo V. Effects of cannabinoids and cannabinoid-enriched Cannabis extracts on TRP channels and endocannabinoid metabolic enzymes. Br. J. Pharm. 2011;163:1479–1494. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.01166.x.
135.Evaluation of BTX 1503 in Patients With Moderate to Severe Acne Vulgaris. [(accessed on 22 January 2020)]; Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03573518.
136.Cooper E., Callahan M. Patent No: WO2018148786A1 (Formulations of Cannabinoids for the treatment of Acne) Botanix Pharmaceuticals Ltd. [(accessed on 22 January 2020)];2018 Available online: https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2018148786A1/en.
137.Du A.X., Osman M., Gniadecki R. Use of Extracorporeal Photopheresis in Scleroderma: A Review. Dermatology. 2019:1–6. doi: 10.1159/000501591.
138.Torok K.S., Li S.C., Jacobe H.M., Taber S.F., Stevens A.M., Zulian F., Lu T.T. Immunopathogenesis of Pediatric Localized Scleroderma. Front. Immunol. 2019;10:908. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00908.
139.Spiera R.F., Hummers L.K., Chung L., Frech T.M., Domsic R.T., Hsu V., Furst D.E., Gordon J.K., Mayes M.D., Simms R.W. ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY. Wiley; Hoboken, NJ, USA: 2017. A phase 2 study of safety and efficacy of anabasum (JBT-101), a cannabinoid receptor type 2 agonist, in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis.
140.Burstein S.H. Ajulemic acid: Potential treatment for chronic inflammation. Pharm. Res. Perspect. 2018;6:e00394. doi: 10.1002/prp2.394.
141.Balistreri E., Garcia-Gonzalez E., Selvi E., Akhmetshina A., Palumbo K., Lorenzini S., Maggio R., Lucattelli M., Galeazzi M., Distler J.W. The cannabinoid WIN55, 212-2 abrogates dermal fibrosis in scleroderma bleomycin model. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2011;70:695–699. doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.137539.
142.Muñoz-Luque J., Ros J., Fernández-Varo G., Tugues S., Morales-Ruiz M., Alvarez C.E., Friedman S.L., Arroyo V., Jiménez W. Regression of fibrosis after chronic stimulation of cannabinoid CB2 receptor in cirrhotic rats. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2008;324:475–483. doi: 10.1124/jpet.107.131896.
143.Servettaz A., Kavian N., Nicco C., Deveaux V., Chereau C., Wang A., Zimmer A., Lotersztajn S., Weill B., Batteux F. Targeting the cannabinoid pathway limits the development of fibrosis and autoimmunity in a mouse model of systemic sclerosis. Am. J. Pathol. 2010;177:187–196. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090763.
144.Volc-Platzer B. Dermatomyositis-update. Hautarzt. 2015;66:604–610. doi: 10.1007/s00105-015-3659-0.
145.Robinson E.S., Alves P., Bashir M.M., Zeidi M., Feng R., Werth V.P. Cannabinoid Reduces Inflammatory Cytokines, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha, and Type I Interferons in Dermatomyositis In Vitro. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2017;137:2445–2447. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2017.05.035.
146.Spiera R., Hummers L., Chung L., Frech T., Domsic R., Furst D., Gordon J., Mayes M., Simms R., Constantine S., et al. OP0126 A phase 2 study of safety and efficacy of anabasum (JBT-101) in systemic sclerosis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2017;76:105. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-eular.2712.
147.Chen K., Zeidi M., Reddy N., White B., Werth V. FRI0307 LENABASUM, A CANNABINOID TYPE 2 RECEPTOR AGONIST, REDUCES CD4 CELL POPULATIONS AND DOWNREGULATES TYPE 1 AND 2 INTERFERON ACTIVITIES IN LESIONAL DERMATOMYOSITIS SKIN. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2019;78:835. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-eular.7759.
148.Werth V., Oddis C.V., Lundberg I.E., Fiorentino D., Cornwall C., Dgetluck N., Constantine S., White B. SAT0303 Design of Phase 3 Study of Lenabasum for the Treatment of Dermatomyositis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2019;78:1228. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-eular.6094.
149.Bentzen J., Kjellberg J., Thorgaard C., Engholm G., Phillip A., Storm H.H. Costs of illness for melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer in Denmark. Eur. J. Cancer Prev. Off. J. Eur. Cancer Prev. Organ. (Ecp) 2013;22:569–576. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e328360150c.
150.Karimkhani C., Dellavalle R.P., Coffeng L.E., Flohr C., Hay R.J., Langan S.M., Nsoesie E.O., Ferrari A.J., Erskine H.E., Silverberg J.I., et al. Global Skin Disease Morbidity and Mortality: An Update From the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. JAMA Dermatol. 2017;153:406–412. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.5538.
151.Shih S.T., Carter R., Heward S., Sinclair C. Economic evaluation of future skin cancer prevention in Australia. Prev. Med. 2017;99:7–12. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.01.013.
152.Simoes M.C.F., Sousa J.J.S., Pais A. Skin cancer and new treatment perspectives: A review. Cancer Lett. 2015;357:8–42. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2014.11.001.
153.Soliman E., Ladin D., Van Dross R. Journal of Dermatology and Clinical Research Central Cannabinoids as Therapeutics for Non-Melanoma and Melanoma Skin Cancer. J. Dermatol. Clin. Res. 2016;4:1069.
154.Morales P., Jagerovic N. Antitumor Cannabinoid Chemotypes: Structural Insights. Front. Pharmacol. 2019;10:621. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00621.
155.Blazquez C., Carracedo A., Barrado L., Real P.J., Fernandez-Luna J.L., Velasco G., Malumbres M., Guzman M. Cannabinoid receptors as novel targets for the treatment of melanoma. Faseb J. Off. Publ. Fed. Am. Soc. Exp. Biol. 2006;20:2633–2635. doi: 10.1096/fj.06-6638fje.
156.Ligresti A., Moriello A.S., Starowicz K., Matias I., Pisanti S., De Petrocellis L., Laezza C., Portella G., Bifulco M., Di Marzo V. Antitumor activity of plant cannabinoids with emphasis on the effect of cannabidiol on human breast carcinoma. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2006;318:1375–1387. doi: 10.1124/jpet.106.105247.
157.Kupczyk P., Reich A., Szepietowski J.C. Cannabinoid system in the skin—A possible target for future therapies in dermatology. Exp. Dermatol. 2009;18:669–679. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2009.00923.x.
158.Massi P., Vaccani A., Bianchessi S., Costa B., Macchi P., Parolaro D. The non-psychoactive cannabidiol triggers caspase activation and oxidative stress in human glioma cells. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. Cmls. 2006;63:2057–2066. doi: 10.1007/s00018-006-6156-x.
159.Mantovani A. Molecular pathways linking inflammation and cancer. Curr. Mol. Med. 2010;10:369–373. doi: 10.2174/156652410791316968.
160.Candido J., Hagemann T. Cancer-related inflammation. J. Clin. Immunol. 2013;33(Suppl. 1):S79–S84. doi: 10.1007/s10875-012-9847-0.
161.Szebeni G.J., Vizler C., Kitajka K., Puskas L.G. Inflammation and Cancer: Extra- and Intracellular Determinants of Tumor-Associated Macrophages as Tumor Promoters. Mediat. Inflamm. 2017;2017:9294018. doi: 10.1155/2017/9294018.
162.Furler R.L., Nixon D.F., Brantner C.A., Popratiloff A., Uittenbogaart C.H. TGF-β Sustains Tumor Progression through Biochemical and Mechanical Signal Transduction. Cancers. 2018;10:199. doi: 10.3390/cancers10060199.
163.Wang X., Lin Y. Tumor necrosis factor and cancer, buddies or foes? Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2008;29:1275–1288. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7254.2008.00889.x.
164.Scheau C., Badarau I.A., Costache R., Caruntu C., Mihai G.L., Didilescu A.C., Constantin C., Neagu M. The Role of Matrix Metalloproteinases in the Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Anal. Cell. Pathol. (Amst. ) 2019;2019:9423907. doi: 10.1155/2019/9423907.
165.Cioni C., Tassi M., Marotta G., Mugnaini C., Corelli F., Annunziata P. A Novel Highly Selective Cannabinoid CB2 Agonist Reduces in vitro Growth and TGF-beta Release of Human Glial Cell Tumors. Cent. Nerv. Syst. Agents Med. Chem. 2019;19:206–214. doi: 10.2174/1871524919666190923154351.
166.Ramer R., Hinz B. Inhibition of cancer cell invasion by cannabinoids via increased expression of tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases-1. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2008;100:59–69. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djm268.
167.Liu-Smith F., Jia J., Zheng Y. UV-Induced Molecular Signaling Differences in Melanoma and Non-melanoma Skin Cancer. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2017;996:27–40. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-56017-5_3.
168.Neagu M., Constantin C., Popescu I.D., Zipeto D., Tzanakakis G., Nikitovic D., Fenga C., Stratakis C.A., Spandidos D.A., Tsatsakis A.M. Inflammation and Metabolism in Cancer Cell-Mitochondria Key Player. Front. Oncol. 2019;9:348. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00348.
169.Armstrong J.L., Hill D.S., McKee C.S., Hernandez-Tiedra S., Lorente M., Lopez-Valero I., Eleni Anagnostou M., Babatunde F., Corazzari M., Redfern C.P.F., et al. Exploiting cannabinoid-induced cytotoxic autophagy to drive melanoma cell death. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2015;135:1629–1637. doi: 10.1038/jid.2015.45.
170.Kis B., Ifrim F.C., Buda V., Avram S., Pavel I.Z., Antal D., Paunescu V., Dehelean C.A., Ardelean F., Diaconeasa Z., et al. Cannabidiol-from Plant to Human Body: A Promising Bioactive Molecule with Multi-Target Effects in Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:5905. doi: 10.3390/ijms20235905.
171.Simmerman E., Qin X., Yu J.C., Baban B. Cannabinoids as a Potential New and Novel Treatment for Melanoma: A Pilot Study in a Murine Model. J. Surg. Res. 2019;235:210–215. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.08.055.
172.Glodde N., Jakobs M., Bald T., Tuting T., Gaffal E. Differential role of cannabinoids in the pathogenesis of skin cancer. Life Sci. 2015;138:35–40. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2015.04.003.
173.Hamtiaux L., Masquelier J., Muccioli G.G., Bouzin C., Feron O., Gallez B., Lambert D.M. The association of N-palmitoylethanolamine with the FAAH inhibitor URB597 impairs melanoma growth through a supra-additive action. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:92. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-92.
174.Adinolfi B., Romanini A., Vanni A., Martinotti E., Chicca A., Fogli S., Nieri P. Anticancer activity of anandamide in human cutaneous melanoma cells. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2013;718:154–159. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2013.08.039.
175.Kenessey I., Banki B., Mark A., Varga N., Tovari J., Ladanyi A., Raso E., Timar J. Revisiting CB1 receptor as drug target in human melanoma. Pathol. Oncol. Res. Por. 2012;18:857–866. doi: 10.1007/s12253-012-9515-y.
176.Carpi S., Fogli S., Polini B., Montagnani V., Podesta A., Breschi M.C., Romanini A., Stecca B., Nieri P. Tumor-promoting effects of cannabinoid receptor type 1 in human melanoma cells. Toxicol. In Vitro. 2017;40:272–279. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2017.01.018.
177.Leber K., Perron V.D., Sinni-McKeehen B. Common skin cancers in the United States: A practical guide for diagnosis and treatment. Nurse Pract. Forum. 1999;10:106–112.
178.De Rosa F.S., Bentley M.V. Photodynamic therapy of skin cancers: Sensitizers, clinical studies and future directives. Pharm. Res. 2000;17:1447–1455. doi: 10.1023/A:1007612905378.
179.Solomon I., Voiculescu V.M., Caruntu C., Lupu M., Popa A., Ilie M.A., Albulescu R., Caruntu A., Tanase C., Constantin C., et al. Neuroendocrine Factors and Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: An Affair to Remember. Dis. Markers. 2018;2018:9787831. doi: 10.1155/2018/9787831.
180.Caruntu C., Boda D., Gutu D.E., Caruntu A. In vivo reflectance confocal microscopy of basal cell carcinoma with cystic degeneration. Rom. J. Morphol. Embryol. Rev. Roum. Morphol. Embryol. 2014;55:1437–1441.
181.Lupu M., Caruntu C., Ghita M.A., Voiculescu V., Voiculescu S., Rosca A.E., Caruntu A., Moraru L., Popa I.M., Calenic B., et al. Gene Expression and Proteome Analysis as Sources of Biomarkers in Basal Cell Carcinoma. Dis. Markers. 2016;2016:9831237. doi: 10.1155/2016/9831237.
182.Voiculescu V., Calenic B., Ghita M., Lupu M., Caruntu A., Moraru L., Voiculescu S., Ion A., Greabu M., Ishkitiev N., et al. From Normal Skin to Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Quest for Novel Biomarkers. Dis. Markers. 2016;2016:4517492. doi: 10.1155/2016/4517492.
183.Nakajima J., Nakae D., Yasukawa K. Structure-dependent inhibitory effects of synthetic cannabinoids against 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate-induced inflammation and skin tumour promotion in mice. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2013;65:1223–1230. doi: 10.1111/jphp.12082.
184.Soliman E., Henderson K.L., Danell A.S., Van Dross R. Arachidonoyl-ethanolamide activates endoplasmic reticulum stress-apoptosis in tumorigenic keratinocytes: Role of cyclooxygenase-2 and novel J-series prostamides. Mol. Carcinog. 2016;55:117–130. doi: 10.1002/mc.22257.
185.Kuc C., Jenkins A., Van Dross R.T. Arachidonoyl ethanolamide (AEA)-induced apoptosis is mediated by J-series prostaglandins and is enhanced by fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) blockade. Mol. Carcinog. 2012;51:139–149. doi: 10.1002/mc.20770.
186.Georgescu S.R., Mitran C.I., Mitran M.I., Caruntu C., Sarbu M.I., Matei C., Nicolae I., Tocut S.M., Popa M.I., Tampa M. New Insights in the Pathogenesis of HPV Infection and the Associated Carcinogenic Processes: The Role of Chronic Inflammation and Oxidative Stress. J. Immunol. Res. 2018;2018:5315816. doi: 10.1155/2018/5315816.
187.Boda D., Neagu M., Constantin C., Voinescu R.N., Caruntu C., Zurac S., Spandidos D.A., Drakoulis N., Tsoukalas D., Tsatsakis A.M. HPV strain distribution in patients with genital warts in a female population sample. Oncol. Lett. 2016;12:1779–1782. doi: 10.3892/ol.2016.4903.
188.Boda D., Docea A.O., Calina D., Ilie M.A., Caruntu C., Zurac S., Neagu M., Constantin C., Branisteanu D.E., Voiculescu V., et al. Human papilloma virus: Apprehending the link with carcinogenesis and unveiling new research avenues (Review) Int. J. Oncol. 2018;52:637–655. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2018.4256.
189.Neagu M., Caruntu C., Constantin C., Boda D., Zurac S., Spandidos D.A., Tsatsakis A.M. Chemically induced skin carcinogenesis: Updates in experimental models (Review) Oncol. Rep. 2016;35:2516–2528. doi: 10.3892/or.2016.4683.
190.Marinescu B., Isvoranu G., Constantin C., Coman C., Zurac S., Caruntu C., Boda D., Neagu M., Calin M. Experimental model of chemically induced skin carcinogenesis in mice. Rev. Română Med. Vet. 2010;20:97–104.
191.Zheng D., Bode A.M., Zhao Q., Cho Y.-Y., Zhu F., Ma W.-Y., Dong Z. The cannabinoid receptors are required for ultraviolet-induced inflammation and skin cancer development. Cancer Res. 2008;68:3992–3998. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6594.
192.Samaniego F., Markham P.D., Gendelman R., Watanabe Y., Kao V., Kowalski K., Sonnabend J.A., Pintus A., Gallo R.C., Ensoli B. Vascular endothelial growth factor and basic fibroblast growth factor present in Kaposi’s sarcoma (KS) are induced by inflammatory cytokines and synergize to promote vascular permeability and KS lesion development. Am. J. Pathol. 1998;152:1433–1443.
193.Schneider J.W., Dittmer D.P. Diagnosis and Treatment of Kaposi Sarcoma. Am. J. Clin. Derm. 2017;18:529–539. doi: 10.1007/s40257-017-0270-4.
194.Luca T., Di Benedetto G., Scuderi M.R., Palumbo M., Clementi S., Bernardini R., Cantarella G. The CB1/CB2 receptor agonist WIN-55,212-2 reduces viability of human Kaposi’s sarcoma cells in vitro. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2009;616:16–21. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2009.06.004.
195.Maor Y., Yu J., Kuzontkoski P.M., Dezube B.J., Zhang X., Groopman J.E. Cannabidiol inhibits growth and induces programmed cell death in kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus-infected endothelium. Genes Cancer. 2012;3:512–520. doi: 10.1177/1947601912466556.
196.Zhang X., Wang J.F., Kunos G., Groopman J.E. Cannabinoid modulation of Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus infection and transformation. Cancer Res. 2007;67:7230–7237. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-0960.
197.Teigen I.A., Serkland T.T., Pahr T., Berg J.A. Should more patients be offered treatment with cannabinoids? Tidsskr. Nor. Laegeforening Tidsskr. Prakt. Med. Raekke. 2019:139. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.19.0211.
198.Serpell M.G., Notcutt W., Collin C. Sativex long-term use: An open-label trial in patients with spasticity due to multiple sclerosis. J. Neurol. 2013;260:285–295. doi: 10.1007/s00415-012-6634-z.
199.Mücke M., Phillips T., Radbruch L., Petzke F., Häuser W. Cannabis-based medicines for chronic neuropathic pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2018;3:CD012182. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012182.pub2.
200.Karila L., Danel T., Coscas S., Chambon J.P., Reynaud M. Progressive cannabis-induced arteritis: A clinical thromboangiitis obliterans sub-group? Presse Med. (Paris, France 1983) 2004;33:21–23. doi: 10.1016/S0755-4982(04)72378-7.
201.Decuyper I., Ryckebosch H., Van Gasse A.L., Sabato V., Faber M., Bridts C.H., Ebo D.G. Cannabis Allergy: What do We Know Anno 2015. Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp. 2015;63:327–332. doi: 10.1007/s00005-015-0352-z.
202.Spaderna M., Addy P.H., D’Souza D.C. Spicing things up: Synthetic cannabinoids. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2013;228:525–540. doi: 10.1007/s00213-013-3188-4.
203.McQuade D., Hudson S., Dargan P.I., Wood D.M. First European case of convulsions related to analytically confirmed use of synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonist AM-2201. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2013;69:373–376. doi: 10.1007/s00228-012-1379-2.
204.Zhou Y., Falenta K., Lalli G. Endocannabinoid signalling in neuronal migration. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2014;47:104–108. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2013.12.007.
205.Taha T., Meiri D., Talhamy S., Wollner M., Peer A., Bar-Sela G. Cannabis Impacts Tumor Response Rate to Nivolumab in Patients with Advanced Malignancies. Oncologist. 2019;24:549–554. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0383.
206.Marcu J. Regulators need to rethink restrictions on cannabis research. Nature. 2019;572:S19. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-02531-6.

Studies

Conditions

Cannabinoids and active compounds

Related research

Abstract

Untitled section

Article notes

Untitled section

Author notes

1. Introduction

2. Cannabinoids

2.1. Description

2.2. Receptors

2.3. Metabolism

3. Inflammation Traits of the Skin

4. Cannabinoids’ Role in Inflammatory Skin Disorders

4.1. Allergic Contact Dermatitis

4.2. Psoriasis

4.3. Acne

4.4. Scleroderma

4.5. Dermatomyositis

5. Cannabinoids’ Role in Skin Cancer and Its Associated Inflammation

5.1. Melanoma

5.2. Non-Melanoma Cancers

5.3. Kaposi Sarcoma

6. Adverse Effects of Cannabinoids

7. Summary and Future Perspectives

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions

Funding

Conflicts of Interest

References

Untitled section

References

Additional materials