Impact of Plant Growth Regulators on Callus Induction in Cannabis sativa L.
Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology, 4940 Hautcharage, Luxembourg; margaux.thiry@list.lu (M.T.); jenny.renaut@list.lu (J.R.)
Earth and Life Institute–Agronomy, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1348 Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium; stanley.lutts@uclouvain.be
PM International AG, 5445 Schengen, Luxembourg; marcus.iken@pm-international.com
Abstract
Callogenesis is a fundamental step in plant biotechnology and tissue culture, providing the basis for multiple scientific and practical applications. In this study, the impact on callogenesis of different plant growth regulators was studied on Cannabis sativa L. (a non-commercial genotype of hemp), with the objective of identifying the most suitable combination for the establishment of vigorously growing, friable calli. Forty-nine media combinations were evaluated using four PGRs: two auxins (2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, naphthaleneacetic acid) and two cytokinins (6-benzylaminopurine, kinetin). Parameters such as percentage of callus induction, proliferation, colour, texture, and growth area were assessed. Three media were identified for further spectrophotometric assays and targeted gene expression analysis: the first containing 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 1.5 µM and benzylaminopurine 1.5 µM, the second with 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 1.5 µM and kinetin 1.5 µM and the third supplemented with 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 4.5 µM and kinetin 1.5 µM. The last medium proved to be superior in terms of vigour, friability and phenolic content and showed increased expression of genes involved in the early steps of the phenylpropanoid pathway. These findings highlight the central role of auxin–cytokinin interactions in regulating both callus formation and secondary metabolism. The optimised medium opens the way to subsequent biotechnological applications relying on the cultivation of plant cell suspension cultures.
Untitled section
Keywords: callogenesis, Cannabis sativa, biotechnology, plant growth regulators, qPCR, phenolics
Article notes
Untitled section
Received 2026 Jan 22; Revised 2026 Feb 16; Accepted 2026 Feb 18; Collection date 2026 Feb.
1. Introduction
Cannabis sativa L. is a highly versatile plant valued for its fibres, nutrient-rich seeds [1] and, most notably, its diverse array of bioactive secondary metabolites including cannabinoids, flavonoids, and terpenes [2,3]. These compounds highlight the plant’s pharmaceutical, cosmetic and nutraceutical relevance, fuelling growing interest in sustainable and scalable biotechnological production systems.
In this context, plant tissue culture techniques have re-emerged as powerful tools: after experiencing a boom of research activity in the 1990s, followed by a period of relative decline, tissue culture has recently regained attention due to its immense biotechnological potential [4]. Beyond clonal propagation and germplasm conservation [5], in vitro culture systems enable controlled studies of plant development and offer alternative routes to produce valuable metabolites [6,7,8,9]. This renewed focus positions tissue culture methods at the intersection of fundamental research and applied biotechnology, particularly for multi-purpose species like C. sativa.
At the core of many tissue culture protocols lies callus induction (a.k.a. callogenesis), a process that demonstrates the capacity of plant tissues to dedifferentiate, i.e., lose their committed fate and re-enter the cell cycle: this step is often found in experimental strategies aimed at regeneration, transformation and establishment of suspension cultures. Callogenesis refers to the induction and proliferation of a callus, an unorganised mass of rapidly dividing cells, typically induced by mechanical stress (e.g., wounding) and controlled by plant growth regulators (PGRs) [10]. Several factors, among which are nutrients and organic components, such as PGRs and sucrose concentration, influence the processes of organogenesis, somatic embryogenesis and callogenesis [11]. In plant tissue culture, PGRs play a key role in regulating important processes, such as cell division, differentiation, and organogenesis through their antagonistic and synergistic interactions [12].
Concerning callogenesis, these factors also influence key traits such as texture (friability/compactness) and colour (e.g., white, cream, brown, pigmented), which are often correlated with the morphological and regenerative characteristics of calli [13], as well as their metabolic activity [14]. With respect to callus formation, auxins and cytokinins are the most widely used PGRs. Their balance influences whether tissues undergo differentiation or dedifferentiation [10]. Notably, callus induction is in general favoured by an intermediate auxin/cytokinin ratio [10]. However, optimisations are necessary depending on the species.
Once vigorously growing, friable calli are established, cell suspension cultures can be set up by transferring them to liquid culture media under shaking. This step is crucial and limiting for the subsequent optimisation of bioprocesses in bioreactors. Because of this central role, robust and effective callus induction is a prerequisite for any advanced plant biotechnology platform.
In the case of C. sativa, optimised callogenesis protocols are not only essential for plant regeneration [15,16] and conservation of elite genotypes, but also for advanced applications such as CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing [17], elicitor-based enhancement of metabolite production [18], and cell suspension culture development [19]. In this respect, optimising callus induction systems in C. sativa represents a strategic step towards harnessing the biotechnological potential of this plant, as callus cultures are essential for scalable secondary metabolite production [20]. It is indeed well-known that C. sativa produces a wide range of secondary metabolites, including phenolic compounds [21]. Among phenolics, flavonoids constitute a major subclass characterised by structural diversity and are particularly interesting in the light of their bioactivities. C. sativa callus cultures thus provide a controlled and versatile system to investigate phenolic biosynthesis and accumulation, supporting fundamental studies on the regulation of secondary metabolism under defined hormonal and environmental conditions, as well as applied research aimed at optimising metabolite production for biotechnological applications.
In the present study, the effects of four widely used PGRs, i.e., 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), naphthalene acetic acid (NAA), 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) and kinetin, were studied on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium, which was selected due to its well-balanced macronutrient and micronutrient composition [22], to find the optimal conditions for callogenesis in C. sativa. This multi-media screening study provides an optimised callogenesis protocol for a non-commercial genotype, Bolonska, sourced from the N.I. Vavilov Institute of Plant Genetic Resources (VIR). The choice of this non-commercial genotype was due to its accessibility through a germplasm collection, its prior characterisation for phytochemical composition [23] and its availability in vitro in sufficient quantities, enabling controlled and repeated experimentation.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Plant Material and Preparation of Explants
Micropropagation was carried out as previously described [23]. Briefly, seeds of the genotype Bolonska (VIR; k-6) were sown in pots containing a 1:2 mixture of sand and potting soil and grown for 8 weeks in growth chambers (Fitotron, Weiss Technik, Liedekerke, Belgium) under controlled conditions (16 h light/8 h dark, 25/20 °C day/night, 60% humidity). Plants were then harvested and used as explant sources: stems were cut into segments of ca. 5 cm with one internode, surface-sterilised and rinsed 3 times with sterile water. Explants were subsequently cultured in Magenta GA-7 boxes (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), containing solid MS medium [22] supplemented with MS vitamins, 3% (w/v) sucrose, and 0.8% (w/v) agar (pH 5.8), and maintained under sterile conditions with a 16 h/8 h photoperiod at 22 °C. The plants were micropropagated for 8 weeks on MS medium without hormones to generate enough material for callogenesis optimisation.
2.2. Callogenesis Optimisation
Callogenesis was carried out on MS medium supplemented with MS vitamins, 3% (w/v) sucrose, 0.8% (w/v) agar, adjusted to pH 5.8 before autoclaving, and different combinations of NAA, BAP, kinetin and 2,4-D. The different combinations of PGRs used are described in Table 1. The concentrations were determined according to the literature data [16,24,25,26,27,28,29]. The media were autoclaved (Systec 1095 VX-150 autoclave, Systec GmbH & Co. KG, Linden, Germany) before use, with a sterilisation cycle of 20 min at 121 °C. All the plant growth regulators (PGRs) were added before autoclaving.
| NAA (µM) ↓ | 0.00 | 1.50 | 4.50 | 13.50 | 0.00 | 1.50 | 4.50 | 13.50 | ← BAP (µM) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 0.00 | ||||
| 5.00 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 1.50 | |
| 15.00 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 4.50 | |
| 45.00 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 13.50 | |
| 0.00 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 0.00 | |||||
| 5.00 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 1.50 | |
| 15.00 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 4.50 | |
| 45.00 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 13.50 | |
| KIN (µM) → | 0.00 | 1.50 | 4.50 | 13.50 | 0.00 | 1.50 | 4.50 | 13.50 | ↑ 2,4-D (µM) |
Stem explants of 0.8–1.2 cm were excised between two nodes under sterile conditions using a scalpel and randomised before transferring them to the Petri dishes containing the different media (55 × 14 mm). Randomisation was performed to avoid biases due to putting explants from the same donor plant together on the same plate. Six Petri dishes were used per medium (with each dish containing 3 stem explants, hence 18 stem explants per treatment). The plates were placed in darkness for 4 weeks at 22 °C, and their position was randomised every 3–4 days. After 4 weeks, different parameters were scored: % of callogenesis (inferred from the total number of stems where calli were visible), extent of callus formation (one-sided, two-sided or homogeneous callus formation across the whole explant), callus proliferation (low, medium, high), colour (cream-coloured, brown or white) and texture (friable or compact). For each variable, the values were scaled to a dimensionless score between 0 and 1, where 1 represents the optimal condition and 0 represents the least optimal condition. Intermediate values were linearly scaled between these two extremes, allowing for the data to be directly compared. This normalisation approach was followed by a visual representation of the data in the form of a hierarchical clustering of the heatmaps, which was done with Cluster 3.0 [30] and rendered with Java Treeview 3.0 [31] (available at http://jtreeview.sourceforge.net/, accessed on 15 October 2025). For heatmap visualisation, normalised values (scaled between 0 and 1) were represented using a continuous colour gradient, where 0 corresponds to the least optimal condition and 1 to the optimal condition.
Subsequently, on a set of seven media showing the best scores, calli were separated from the original explants and sub-cultured on the corresponding media to calculate their growth over a time-window of 2 months. The growth area was calculated by taking photographs every 7 days and delineating the contour of each callus with ImageJ (version 1.54d) to select the best media. Three media were identified, and calli growth was again monitored after cultivation over a period of 2 months, corresponding to 2 consecutive rounds of sub-culture of 1 month each. For each of the 3 media, the calli texture, colour, total phenolic content, antioxidant activities and gene expression were evaluated.
2.3. Spectrophotometric Assays for the Determination of the Antioxidant Activity and Total Phenolic Content
Calli from each of the 3 final media were flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen, ground to a fine powder using a mortar and pestle and lyophilised for 3 days. The samples were then weighed, and an ethanol/water (80/20 v/v) mixture was finally added at a 1:30 ratio (w/v) to perform extraction. The mixture was vortexed for 5 s and sonicated for 10 min at 37 Hz, with 100% power at room temperature. The samples were then agitated for 30 min at 6.5 Hz at room temperature with the Mixer Mill MM 400 (Retsch, Veder Scientific, Haan, Germany) and centrifuged for 20 min at full speed (14,000 rpm) at 4 °C. The supernatants were transferred to 2 mL tubes (Eppendorf). The amount of total phenolic content was determined using the Folin–Ciocâlteu method [32,33]. A calibration curve was prepared with a concentration of gallic acid ranging from 0 to 0.05 mg/mL. The total phenolic content was expressed as gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/g DW (dry weight).
The antioxidant activities were determined using the Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP) assay [34]. In a 96-well plate, 10 µL of extract and 190 µL of FRAP reagent were pipetted. The reagent was composed of acetate buffer, ferric 2,4,6-tripyridyl-s-triazine (TPTZ) solution, and FeCl3 at a ratio of 10:1:1 v/v/v. Three technical replicates were prepared per sample. The plate was then incubated in darkness for 20 min and the absorbance was read with a spectrophotometer (Spark20M, TECAN, Männedorf, Switzerland) at 593 nm. A standard curve with FeSO4 was prepared (0–1 mM). The final antioxidant power was expressed as mM FeSO4/g dry weight (DW).
2.4. RNA Extraction and Targeted Gene Expression Analysis
Calli (1-month-old) grown on the 3 selected media were harvested for targeted gene expression analysis. Three biological replicates were prepared. Total RNA was extracted from the finely ground calli using the Qiagen RNeasy Plant Mini kit (Qiagen N.V, Venlo, Netherland) with the on-column DNase treatment. The purified RNAs were quantified using a NanoPhotometer NP80 (Implen, Munich, Germany) with RNase-free water as a blank. RNA integrities were then checked by capillary gel electrophoresis on a 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent, Santa Clara, California, USA), using the RNA 6000 nano chip (Agilent). All RINs were >7.
One microgram of RNA was retrotranscribed to cDNA using the ProtoScript II RTase (NEB) and random hexamers. RT-qPCR was carried out in 384-well microplates prepared with a pipetting robot (epMotion, Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) and run using the Takyon Rox SYBR MasterMix dTTP blueMix (Kaneka Eurogentec S.A., Seraing, Belgium) in a QuantStudio™ A28569 thermal cycler (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA). The expression was calculated using 2 reference genes (Fbox and eTIF4E), which geNORM, implemented in qBASE+ [35], identified as sufficient for data normalisation. The primers were previously reported [23,36,37] (Supplementary File, folder “qPCR primers”).
2.5. Cultivation of Other C. sativa Genotypes on the 3 Selected Media
Calli derived from stem explants of other genotypes propagated in vitro, namely Local 14 and Fédora 17, were initially induced and cultivated on a medium supplemented with 2,4-D 4.5 µM and kinetin 0.93 µM. Subsequently, the calli were transferred to the 3 selected media and sub-cultured twice (corresponding to a period of 2 months) to allow acclimatisation to the new culture conditions.
2.6. Statistics
Statistics were performed with the SPSS software (IBM SPSS Statistics v20) after log10-transformation of the data. Normality and homogeneity were checked with a Shapiro–Wilk and Levene’s test, respectively. Normal and homogeneous data were analysed with a one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test, while non-parametric data were analysed with a Kruskal–Wallis test coupled to a Dunn’s post hoc test.
3. Results
3.1. Effect of PGRs on Callogenesis
The most effective callogenesis media were identified by assessing five key parameters: percentage of callus induction, extent of callus formation across the stem, callus proliferation, colour, and texture (Figure 1; Supplementary File, folders “Parameters scored” and “Means of the parameters”). The optimal characteristics for these parameters were defined as follows: 100% callus induction, callus formation across the entire stem segment, high proliferation of callus biomass, cream-coloured, and friable texture.
The hierarchical clustering of the normalised data obtained for each of the five parameters (Supplementary File, folders “Normalised data” and “Means of the normalised data”) revealed three main clusters when using a Pearson correlation coefficient threshold ≥0.91 (Figure 2), indicating strong similarity among the best-performing media. Cluster 1 comprises media 4, 24, 17 and 46, which did not show optimal parameters, as evidenced by a low callus proliferation. Similarly, Cluster 2, comprising media 2, 37, 3, 48, 35, 36, 44 and 49, was characterised by generally poor scores across all media, including callus proliferation, coverage, colour, and texture. Cluster 3 also resulted in non-optimal characteristics, particularly in terms of callus proliferation, colour, and texture, thereby limiting its suitability for the subsequent establishment of cell suspensions. In contrast, the sub-group within Cluster 1, including eight media formulations, i.e., media 20, 26, 13, 43, 39, 38, 42 and 47 (Table 1), showed the best results. However, medium 20 was excluded due to its suboptimal callogenesis percentage. The remaining seven media from Cluster 1, i.e., media 26, 13, 43, 39, 38, 42 and 47, were selected for further analysis to identify the most effective formulations among them. These seven media consistently induced callogenesis with high proliferation and extent of explant coverage. For simplicity, these seven media will be referred to as media I-VII (Table 2).
| Medium | Number | Original Number | Texture | Colour | Picture |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAA 45 µM | I | 13 | Compact | Brown | |
| 2,4-D 1.5 µM | II | 38 | Compact | Brown | |
| 2,4-D 1.5 µM with + KIN 1.5 µM | III | 39 | Friable | Creamy | |
| 2,4-D 4.5 µM with + KIN 1.5 µM | IV | 43 | Friable | Creamy | |
| 2,4-D 13.5 µM with + KIN 1.5 µM | V | 47 | Compact | Brownish | |
| 2,4-D 1.5 µM with + BAP 1.5 µM | VI | 26 | Friable | Creamy | |
| 2,4-D 4.5 µM | VII | 42 | Compact | Brownish |
3.2. Efficiency of Selected Media in Callus Propagation and Maintenance
Calli derived from the seven selected media were sub-cultured onto their respective media for a period of 2 months. At the end of this period, callus growth, texture, and colour were again assessed. Growth was evaluated by measuring the surface area (in cm2) of each callus at day 0 (D0) and day 65 (D65) using the ImageJ software version 1.54d (Supplementary File, folder “Growth area”). At day 65 of the experiment, the growth of the calli did not differ significantly across the seven different media (Supplementary File, folder “Growth area”).
Consequently, media selection was based on qualitative parameters: callus colour and texture. Based on the previous evaluation criteria, three media were selected for further analysis: 2,4-D 4.5 µM + kinetin 1.5 µM (henceforth referred to as medium A, a.k.a. medium 43), 2,4-D 1.5 µM + kinetin 1.5 µM (medium B, a.k.a. medium 39), and 2,4-D 1.5 µM + BAP 1.5 µM (medium C, a.k.a. medium 26). Calli maintained on these three media were predominantly cream-coloured and friable (Table 2).
The calli were transferred onto fresh medium and sub-cultured for two successive cycles, each lasting 1 month (Figure 3). In Figure 3, it is possible to observe that medium B promoted better growth compared to medium A and C. Concerning colour and texture, no major differences could be observed.
3.3. Spectrophotometric Assays in the Calli Propagated on the Three Best Media
The total phenolic content and antioxidant capacity were measured to evaluate and compare the three selected media. The results are shown in Figure 4. The data indicated that media A and B had statistically significantly higher total phenolic contents than medium C (Figure 4A). With respect to the antioxidant capacity, there were no significant differences among the three media, although media A and B showed a tendency towards higher values (Figure 4B).
3.4. Gene Expression Analysis on the Calli Cultivated on the Three Best Media
Targeted gene expression profiling was carried out on calli grown on the three selected media (Figure 5). To determine whether medium-dependent differences existed in the expression of genes involved in phenolic compound biosynthesis, 12 genes encoding enzymes that participate in the phenylpropanoid pathway were screened. The genes studied are phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL), 4-coumarate:coenzyme A ligase (4CL), chalcone isomerase (CHI), flavone synthase (FNS), and flavonoid 3′-hydroxylase (F3′H3). Prenyltransferases (PT1-3-5-6) and O-methyltransferases (OMT6 and 21) were also included.
The genes PAL4, PAL7 and 4CL1 showed significantly higher expression in medium A than in medium C. The gene OMT6 showed significantly increased expression in medium B compared to medium C. On the other hand, the genes CHI2 and F3′H3 showed higher expression in medium C compared to medium A. No statistically significant differences could be observed for the prenyltransferases PT1-3-5-6 and the O-methyltransferase OMT21.
3.5. Cultivation of Other C. sativa Genotypes on the Three Selected Media
In order to verify whether the three selected media allowed for the successful propagation of calli from other genotypes, one non-commercial genotype (Local 14; [23]) and one commercial genotype (Fédora 17) were also investigated (Figure 6). After 1 and a half months of culture, medium A showed more vigorous and friable calli compared to media B and C. These differences were particularly evident in the commercial genotype Fédora 17, which showed extensive browning on medium C (Figure 6B).
4. Discussion
The interest in C. sativa tissue culture has increased substantially in recent years [15,18,38,39,40,41,42,43,44], driven by the potential to produce high-value bioactive compounds. The well-characterised phytochemical profile and economic importance of C. sativa make it an ideal model for optimising bioprocesses, elicitation strategies, and advanced propagation techniques, with implications for pharmaceuticals, breeding, and conservation strategies. In this respect, the present study confirmed that PGRs play a decisive role in callus induction and growth. We focused on two major PGR classes, auxins and cytokinins, both of which are well recognised as key regulators of callogenesis in C. sativa [13,27,44]. Their synergistic interaction promotes cell dedifferentiation and proliferation, enabling callus initiation and sustained growth [10].
Monthony et al. [27] provided a comprehensive overview of callogenesis protocols in C. sativa, highlighting the recurrent use of kinetin, NAA, 2,4-D, BAP, and thidiazuron (TDZ) in different combinations. These studies also emphasised the strong genotype dependence of callogenesis, underlining the need for systematic optimisation of PGRs for each genetic background.
As an initial step, this study evaluated 49 PGR combinations to identify an efficient medium for C. sativa callus induction and long-term maintenance, with potential applicability to the subsequent establishment of cell suspension cultures. The most effective callogenesis media were identified by assessing different parameters: percentage of callus induction, extent of callus coverage across the stem, callus proliferation, colour, and texture. Among the auxin-cytokinin combinations tested, the media supplemented with 2,4-D 4.5 µM + kinetin 1.5 µM (medium A), 2,4-D 1.5 µM + kinetin 1.5 µM (medium B), and 2,4-D 1.5 µM + BAP 1.5 µM (medium C) gave the best results (Figure 2). Subsequent assessment of total phenolic content, antioxidant activity and gene expression further distinguished these media, with 2,4-D 4.5 µM + kinetin 1.5 µM emerging as the most effective in terms of calli vigour, colour, texture, total phenolic content and expression of genes intervening in the phenylpropanoid pathway (Figure 4 and Figure 5).
In C. sativa, the majority of published studies have focused on regeneration protocols, frequently using TDZ combined with NAA or 2,4-D and often employing drug-type genotypes [45]. By contrast, our study specifically targeted callogenesis and callus proliferation in a non-drug and non-commercial genotype, which could explain the observed differences in response. Mechanistically, although both NAA and 2,4-D are synthetic auxins, they trigger distinct downstream pathways. As shown by Campanoni and Nick [46], 2,4-D efficiently activates the auxin receptor-mediated program that promotes cell division, whereas NAA preferentially stimulates cell elongation. This can explain why 2,4-D combinations generally produce a higher callus proliferation. Higher concentrations of NAA are required to achieve comparable proliferation [46].
In the set-up studied here, the combination of 2,4-D with kinetin outperformed NAA-based treatments (Figure 2 and Table 2). The consistent effectiveness of this combination across various species [47,48,49] supports its general utility; nevertheless, the genotype-dependent variability in growth observed in the two other C. sativa genotypes, the non-commercial Local 14 and the commercial Fédora 17 (Figure 6), highlights the importance of tailored optimisation in this species.
The capacity of these PGRs to influence callus texture/colour/vigour, as well as the abundance of total phenolic compounds, the antioxidant capacity and the expression of genes intervening in the phenylpropanoid pathway, suggests that careful medium selection can simultaneously optimise both morphological and metabolic outcomes, which are essential for the establishment of robust bioprocesses aimed at producing secondary metabolites. Several reports have described the effect of PGRs on phenolic accumulation in both in vitro-cultivated plants and calli [50,51,52,53].
Gene expression analysis revealed a significantly higher expression of genes involved in the upstream steps of the phenylpropanoid pathway, i.e., PAL4, PAL7, and 4CL1, in medium A containing 2,4-D 4.5 µM + kinetin 1.5 µM. The increased expression of PAL genes in media containing kinetin is in agreement with the results reported in kinetin-treated tobacco callus [54], in which the transcriptional activation was accompanied by an enzymatic activity increase. In this study, the increased accumulation of total phenolics observed in callus cultures on media A and B (Figure 4) correlated with higher expression of PAL transcripts.
PAL catalyses the first committed step of the phenylpropanoid pathway, directing the C flux from primary metabolism towards the synthesis of diverse phenolic compounds [55]. Since PAL determines the entry rate into this pathway, it is legitimate to speculate that high PAL expression under the supplementation of 2,4-D and kinetin leads to increased PAL activity and enhanced phenolic biosynthesis. The higher PAL expression detected under the 2,4-D + kinetin treatment likely increased substrate availability for downstream enzymes such as 4CL, OMT, and FNS, contributing to the observed higher content in phenolic compounds. Although not statistically significant, media A and B, both based on 2,4-D and kinetin, showed a tendency towards higher expression values of FNS6 and OMT21 compared to medium C (Figure 6).
In contrast, CHI2 and F3′H3 expression reached their highest levels in medium C containing 2,4-D 1.5 µM + BAP 1.5 µM, indicating that BAP could favour the final conversion steps leading to diverse flavonoids. Indeed, CHI leads to the biosynthesis of naringenin and F3′H to the biosynthesis of quercetin or luteolin [36,56].
The differences observed in gene expression when using different cytokinins are not surprising: transcriptomic comparisons on leaf tissues of Arabidopsis plants showed that kinetin and BAP activate distinct gene sets, including transcripts intervening in the phenylpropanoid pathway [57]. In A. thaliana leaves, BAP induced the early steps of phenylpropanoid synthesis and repressed almost all flavonoid/anthocyanin biosynthetic genes. The C. sativa callus model used here revealed a kinetin-associated upregulation of upstream biosynthetic genes, suggesting that cytokinin identity modulates phenolic metabolism in a context-dependent manner. Indeed, the experimental system employed in this study differs substantially from leaf tissues, and such differences in developmental context likely account for the divergent regulatory responses observed.
This study presented a comprehensive approach to optimising callogenesis in C. sativa through the screening of 49 auxin–cytokinin combinations and identified the most suitable one for callus maintenance and production of phenolic compounds. Beyond optimising callus induction, future research should focus on developing stable C. sativa cell suspension cultures to enable scalable biotechnological applications such as secondary metabolite production. Moreover, assessing the genetic stability of long-term cultures through molecular markers or epigenetic profiling will be essential to ensure the fidelity and reproducibility of in vitro-derived cell lines over time.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Sergei Grigorev (N.I. Vavilov Institute of Plant Genetic Resources) for the provision of the non-commercial seeds studied.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cells15040385/s1, Supplementary File with sub-folders indicating: parameters scored, means of the parameters, normalised data, means of the normalised data, growth area and qPCR primers.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Funding Statement
This research was funded by the Luxembourg National Research Fund, project “HEMPHASE”, grant number O21/16231453.
Footnotes
Footnote Group
References
Untitled section
References
- 1.Kaur G., Kander R. The Sustainability of Industrial Hemp: A Literature Review of Its Economic, Environmental, and Social Sustainability. Sustainability. 2023;15:6457. doi: 10.3390/su15086457.
- 2.Andre C.M., Hausman J.-F., Guerriero G. Cannabis sativa: The Plant of the Thousand and One Molecules. Front. Plant Sci. 2016;7:19. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00019.
- 3.Darigh F., Iranbakhsh A., Oraghi Ardebili Z., Ebadi M., Hassanpour H. Simulated microgravity contributed to modification of callogenesis performance and secondary metabolite production in Cannabis indica. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2022;186:157–168. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2022.07.012.
- 4.Häkkinen S.T., Legay S., Rischer H., Renaut J., Guerriero G. Editorial: Plant cell factories: Current and future uses of plant cell cultures. Front. Plant Sci. 2024;15:1439261. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1439261.
- 5.Panis B., Nagel M., Van den Houwe I. Challenges and Prospects for the Conservation of Crop Genetic Resources in Field Genebanks, in In vitro Collections and/or in Liquid Nitrogen. Plants. 2020;9:1634. doi: 10.3390/plants9121634.
- 6.Eibl R., Meier P., Stutz I., Schildberger D., Hühn T., Eibl D. Plant cell culture technology in the cosmetics and food industries: Current state and future trends. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018;102:8661–8675. doi: 10.1007/s00253-018-9279-8.
- 7.Mohaddab M., El Goumi Y., Gallo M., Montesano D., Zengin G., Bouyahya A., Fakiri M. Biotechnology and In vitro Culture as an Alternative System for Secondary Metabolite Production. Molecules. 2022;27:8093. doi: 10.3390/molecules27228093.
- 8.Reshi Z.A., Ahmad W., Lukatkin A.S., Javed S.B. From Nature to Lab: A Review of Secondary Metabolite Biosynthetic Pathways, Environmental Influences, and In vitro Approaches. Metabolites. 2023;13:895. doi: 10.3390/metabo13080895.
- 9.Wu T., Kerbler S.M., Fernie A.R., Zhang Y. Plant cell cultures as heterologous bio-factories for secondary metabolite production. Plant Commun. 2021;2:100235. doi: 10.1016/j.xplc.2021.100235.
- 10.Ikeuchi M., Sugimoto K., Iwase A. Plant Callus: Mechanisms of Induction and Repression. Plant Cell. 2013;25:3159–3173. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.116053.
- 11.Xu P., Zhong Y., Xu A., Liu B., Zhang Y., Zhao A., Yang X., Ming M., Cao F., Fu F. Application of Developmental Regulators for Enhancing Plant Regeneration and Genetic Transformation. Plants. 2024;13:1272. doi: 10.3390/plants13091272.
- 12.Pasternak T.P., Steinmacher D. Plant Growth Regulation in Cell and Tissue Culture In vitro. Plants. 2024;13:327. doi: 10.3390/plants13020327.
- 13.Hesami M., Jones A.M.P. Modeling and optimizing callus growth and development in Cannabis sativa using random forest and support vector machine in combination with a genetic algorithm. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021;105:5201–5212. doi: 10.1007/s00253-021-11375-y.
- 14.Ozden M. Secondary metabolite production in callus cultures of Vitis vinifera: Influence of genotype and sucrose concentration in the medium on antioxidant activity. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2023;46:6. doi: 10.1007/s11738-023-03630-8.
- 15.Sorokin A., Kovalchuk I. Development of efficient and scalable regeneration tissue culture method for Cannabis sativa. Plant Sci. 2025;350:112296. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2024.112296.
- 16.Lata H., Chandra S., Khan I.A., Elsohly M.A. High frequency plant regeneration from leaf derived callus of high Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol yielding Cannabis sativa L. Planta Med. 2010;76:1629–1633. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1249773.
- 17.Zhang X., Xu G., Cheng C., Lei L., Sun J., Xu Y., Deng C., Dai Z., Yang Z., Chen X., et al. Establishment of an Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation and CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Hemp (Cannabis Sativa L.) Plant Biotechnol. J. 2021;19:1979–1987. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13611.
- 18.Gabotti D., Locatelli F., Cusano E., Baldoni E., Genga A., Pucci L., Consonni R., Mattana M. Cell Suspensions of Cannabis sativa (var. Futura): Effect of Elicitation on Metabolite Content and Antioxidant Activity. Molecules. 2019;24:4056. doi: 10.3390/molecules24224056.
- 19.Flores-Sanchez I.J., Peč J., Fei J., Choi Y.H., Dušek J., Verpoorte R. Elicitation studies in cell suspension cultures of Cannabis sativa L. J. Biotechnol. 2009;143:157–168. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2009.05.006.
- 20.Ahsan S.M., Hoque M.I.-U.-, Das A.K., Shaffique S., Rahman M.M., Choi H.W. Plant improvement and metabolite production in Cannabis sativa: Recent biotechnological advances. Plant Trends. 2024;2:74–91. doi: 10.5455/pt.2024.07.
- 21.Flores-Sanchez I.J., Verpoorte R. Secondary metabolism in cannabis. Phytochem. Rev. 2008;7:615–639. doi: 10.1007/s11101-008-9094-4.
- 22.Murashige T., Skoog F. A Revised Medium for Rapid Growth and Bio Assays with Tobacco Tissue Cultures. Physiol. Plant. 1962;15:473–497. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x.
- 23.Thiry M., Sergeant K., Cocco E., Grigorev S., Iken M., Hausman J.-F., Renaut J., Lutts S., Guerriero G. A molecular analysis in leaves of in vitro-cultivated commercial and non-commercial Cannabis sativa genotypes. Ind. Crops Prod. 2025;236:121921. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2025.121921.
- 24.Raharjo T.J., Eucharia O., Chang W.-T., Verpoorte R. Verpoorte, callus induction and phytochemical characterization of Cannabis sativa cell suspension cultures. Indones. J. Chem. 2010;6:70–74. doi: 10.22146/ijc.21776.
- 25.Wielgus K., Luwanska A., Lassocinski W., Kaczmarek Z. Estimation of Cannabis sativa L. Tissue Culture Conditions Essential for Callus Induction and Plant Regeneration. J. Nat. Fibers. 2008;5:199–207. doi: 10.1080/15440470801976045.
- 26.Farag S. PhD Thesis. Technical University Dortmund; Dortmund, Germany: 2014. Cannabinoids Production in Cannabis sativa L.: An In Vitro Approach.
- 27.Monthony A., Page S., Hesami M., Jones A. The Past, Present and Future of Cannabis sativa Tissue Culture. Plants. 2021;10:185. doi: 10.3390/plants10010185.
- 28.Adams T.K., Masondo N.A., Malatsi P., Makunga N.P. Cannabis sativa: From Therapeutic Uses to Micropropagation and Beyond. Plants. 2021;10:2078. doi: 10.3390/plants10102078.
- 29.Page S.R.G., Monthony A.S., Jones A.M.P. Basal media optimization for the micropropagation and callogenesis of Cannabis sativa L. bioRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.02.07.939181.
- 30.Metsalu T., Vilo J. ClustVis: A web tool for visualizing clustering of multivariate data using Principal Component Analysis and heatmap. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:W566–W570. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv468.
- 31.Saldanha A.J. Java Treeview—Extensible visualization of microarray data. Bioinformatics. 2004;20:3246–3248. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth349.
- 32.Folin O., Ciocalteu V. On tyrosine and tryptophane determinations in proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 1927;73:627–650. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)84277-6.
- 33.Singleton V.L., Rossi J.A. Colorimetry of Total Phenolics with Phosphomolybdic-Phosphotungstic Acid Reagents. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1965;16:144–158. doi: 10.5344/ajev.1965.16.3.144.
- 34.Benzie I.F., Strain J.J. The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of “antioxidant power”: The FRAP assay. Anal. Biochem. 1996;239:70–76. doi: 10.1006/abio.1996.0292.
- 35.Hellemans J., Mortier G., De Paepe A., Speleman F., Vandesompele J. qBase relative quantification framework and software for management and automated analysis of real-time quantitative PCR data. Genome Biol. 2007;8:R19. doi: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-2-r19.
- 36.Gao C., Cheng C., Zhao L., Yu Y., Tang Q., Xin P., Liu T., Yan Z., Guo Y., Zang G. Genome-Wide Expression Profiles of Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) in Response to Drought Stress. Int. J. Genom. 2018;2018:e3057272. doi: 10.1155/2018/3057272.
- 37.Guerriero G., Behr M., Legay S., Mangeot-Peter L., Zorzan S., Ghoniem M., Hausman J.-F. Transcriptomic profiling of hemp bast fibres at different developmental stages. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:4961. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-05200-8.
- 38.Ajdanian L., Arouiee H., Phineas Jones A.M., Hesami M., Nemati H., Pepe M. Investigating the impact of paclobutrazol and tannic acid on floral development of in vitro-grown cannabis plantlets. Heliyon. 2024;10:e36768. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36768.
- 39.Das R., Kretzschmar T., Mieog J.C. Importance of Media Composition and Explant Type in Cannabis sativa Tissue Culture. Plants. 2024;13:2544. doi: 10.3390/plants13182544.
- 40.Hesami M., Pepe M., Baiton A., Jones A.M.P. Current status and future prospects in cannabinoid production through in vitro culture and synthetic biology. Biotechnol. Adv. 2023;62:108074. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2022.108074.
- 41.Jafari M., Paul N., Hesami M., Jones A.M.P. Machine Learning-Aided Optimization of In vitro Tetraploid Induction in Cannabis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025;26:1746. doi: 10.3390/ijms26041746.
- 42.Lavie O., Buxdorf K., Eshed Williams L. Optimizing cannabis cultivation: An efficient in vitro system for flowering induction. Plant Methods. 2024;20:141. doi: 10.1186/s13007-024-01265-5.
- 43.McKay M., Faust J.E., Taylor M., Adelberg J. Modified Media for Repeated In vitro Cutting Cycles of Cannabis sativa Without the Use of Cytokinin. Plants. 2025;14:1138. doi: 10.3390/plants14071138.
- 44.Yu G.-R., Kim D.-H., Kim H., Lim D.-W. Evaluation of Cannabis sativa L. Callus Extract as a Novel Cosmetic Ingredient with Dual Anti-Inflammatory and Antioxidant Effects. Plants. 2025;14:1148. doi: 10.3390/plants14071148.
- 45.Chaohua C., Gonggu Z., Lining Z., Chunsheng G., Qing T., Jianhua C., Xinbo G., Dingxiang P., Jianguang S. A rapid shoot regeneration protocol from the cotyledons of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) Ind. Crops Prod. 2016;83:61–65. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.12.035.
- 46.Campanoni P., Nick P. Auxin-dependent cell division and cell elongation. 1-Naphthaleneacetic acid and 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid activate different pathways. Plant Physiol. 2005;137:939–948. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.053843.
- 47.Saleem Y., Emad M.Z., Ali A., Naz S. Synergetic Effect of Different Plant Growth Regulators on Micropropagation of Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) by Callogenesis. Agriculture. 2022;12:1812. doi: 10.3390/agriculture12111812.
- 48.Yamina H., Kadiri A., Ighilhariz Z. Atriplex halimus (Amarantacees) callogenesis induction from different explant type. J. Fundam. Appl. Sci. 2018;10:20. doi: 10.4314/jfas.v10i1.2.
- 49.Zouagri I., Nouri L., Chafaa S., Kebieche M., Fateh M. Optimization of callogenesis by combination of 2,4-d and kinetin in apricot tissues (Prunus armeniaca L.) Cultured in Aures, Algeria. Analele Univ. Din Oradea Fasc. Biol. 2025;XXXII:117–124.
- 50.Karalija E., Paric A. The effect of BA and IBA on the secondary metabolite production by shoot culture of Thymus vulgaris L. Biol. Nyssana. 2011;2:29–35.
- 51.Shilpashree H.P., Vittal R. In vitro plant regeneration and accumulation of flavonoids in Hypericum mysorense. Int. J. Integr. Biol. 2009;8:43–49.
- 52.Topdemir A., Buran A. Determination of antioxidant activity and phenolic and flavonoid content of Ocimum basilicum L. callus cultures obtained by different plant growth regulators. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus. 2023;22:133–149. doi: 10.24326/asphc.2023.1661.
- 53.Zhang X., Xiong Y., Wang Y., Wu C., Teixeira da Silva J.A., Ma G. 6-benzyladenine, a cytokinin, promotes the accumulation of essential oil, flavonoids, and phenolics in Santalum album heartwood by interacting with other hormones. Ind. Crops Prod. 2025;223:120285. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2024.120285.
- 54.Nagai N., Kitauchi F., Okamoto K., Kanda T., Shimosaka M., Okazaki M. A transient increase of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase transcript in kinetin-treated tobacco callus. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1994;58:558–559. doi: 10.1271/bbb.58.558.
- 55.Vogt T. Phenylpropanoid Biosynthesis. Mol. Plant. 2010;3:2–20. doi: 10.1093/mp/ssp106.
- 56.Bautista J.L., Yu S., Tian L. Flavonoids in Cannabis sativa: Biosynthesis, Bioactivities, and Biotechnology. ACS Omega. 2021;6:5119–5123. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.1c00318.
- 57.Bozsó Z., Barna B. Diverse Effect of Two Cytokinins, Kinetin and Benzyladenine, on Plant Development, Biotic Stress Tolerance, and Gene Expression. Life. 2021;11:1404. doi: 10.3390/life11121404.
Associated Data
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.