From sunscreens to medicines: Can a dissipation hypothesis explain the beneficial aspects of many plant compounds?
Nunn et al.
Research Centre for Optimal Health, Department of Life Sciences University of Westminster London UK
GW pharmaceuticals Salisbury Wiltshire UK
STFC, UKRI & Department of Biological and Medical Sciences Oxford Brookes University Oxford UK
*CorrespondenceAlistair V.W. Nunn, Research Centre for Optimal Health, Department of Life Sciences, University of Westminster, London W1W 6UW, UK.
Email: a.nunn@westminster.ac.uk
Abstract
Medicine has utilised plant‐based treatments for millennia, but precisely how they work is unclear. One approach is to use a thermodynamic viewpoint that life arose by dissipating geothermal and/or solar potential. Hence, the ability to dissipate energy to maintain homeostasis is a fundamental principle in all life, which can be viewed as an accretion system where layers of complexity have built upon core abiotic molecules. Many of these compounds are chromophoric and are now involved in multiple pathways. Plants have further evolved a plethora of chromophoric compounds that can not only act as sunscreens and redox modifiers, but also have now become integrated into a generalised stress adaptive system. This could be an extension of the dissipative process. In animals, many of these compounds are hormetic, modulating mitochondria and calcium signalling. They can also display anti‐pathogen effects. They could therefore modulate bioenergetics across all life due to the conserved electron transport chain and proton gradient. In this review paper, we focus on well‐described medicinal compounds, such as salicylic acid and cannabidiol and suggest, at least in animals, their activity reflects their evolved function in plants in relation to stress adaptation, which itself evolved to maintain dissipative homeostasis.
Article notes
Nunn AVW , Guy GW , Botchway SW , Bell JD . From sunscreens to medicines: Can a dissipation hypothesis explain the beneficial aspects of many plant compounds? Phytotherapy Research. 2020;34:1868–1888. 10.1002/ptr.6654 32166791PMC7496984
1INTRODUCTION
To date, there is still no real consensus on why many plant products exert their medicinal benefits in animals, but certainly compounds such as salicylic acid, resveratrol, curcumin, the green tea catechins, and the phytocannabinoids, tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD), appear to be anti‐inflammatory and anti‐proliferative. Although many do have established intracellular receptors and targets (Duthie & Wood, 2011; Itokawa, Shi, Akiyama, Morris‐Natschke, & Lee, 2008; Patra, Rizzi, Silva, Rugina, & Bettuzzi, 2008; Pertwee, 2014; Pervaiz & Holme, 2009), the sheer number has made defining their mode of action difficult. For instance, the number of targets and pathways that resveratrol interacts with is bewildering, as multiple groups have found that it modulates inflammation, redox, cell cycle, death and survival, kinases, mitochondrial function, autophagy and affects multiple receptors, transcription factors and ion channels; the outcome is often biphasic, depending on dose (Pervaiz & Holme, 2009). Equally, more than 65 discrete molecular targets have been reported in the literature for CBD (Ibeas Bih et al., 2015). The number of targets identified and predicted for salicylic acid also continues to grow (Alfonso, Ai, Spitale, & Bhat, 2014). Hence, the possibility that a single ‘druggable’ target could explain how medicinal plant compounds work in animals has become less plausible, but does suggest they could be ‘multi‐target’, and the diverse number of systems they seem to be interacting with being explained by evolution building on their basic properties and the shared biochemistry between plants and animals.
A key clue, we believe, is embraced by the concept of ‘xenohormesis’: in effect, because most of these compounds are related to stress adaptation in the plant, animals have adopted them as they provide environmental signals that can help them survive more difficult times (Hooper, Hooper, Tytell, & Vigh, 2010; Lamming, Wood, & Sinclair, 2004). Although the activation of the xenobiotic system can explain many of the beneficial effects (Mattson, 2008; Zhang, Pi, Woods, & Andersen, 2009), it could also be related to ‘mitohormesis’ as many of these compounds stimulate mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) as an adaptive signal (Tapia, 2006). In fact, many polyphenols do seem to modulate mitochondrial function (Gorlach, Fichna, & Lewandowska, 2015) and can initiate mitophagy (Tan & Wong, 2017). Critically, many plant extracts show biphasic effects in animal models, that is, at low doses, they seem to be pro‐inflammatory, but at higher doses, they become anti‐inflammatory, which is commensurate in some cases with an increase in toxicity (Schink et al., 2018) and is thus strongly suggestive of hormesis (Calabrese, Agathokleous, Kapoor, Kozumbo, & Rattan, 2019). Furthermore, data also indicate many of these compounds are also are anti‐bacterial (Daglia, 2012), which might hint that their ability to also modulate mitochondria may share a common mechanism. The key point is that central components of the electron transport chain (ETC), and the proton gradient, were among the first systems to evolve after life began and are retained in all life and have become more complex, but only by accretion of extra components.
The origins of these abilities seem to have arisen as plants started to colonise the land and thus had the need to resist much higher levels of UV and the generation of free radicals by photon absorption. To do this, they evolved a plethora of chromophoric compounds containing conjugated double‐bond systems that cannot only absorb light efficiently, potentially acting as sunscreens, but also appearing to act as antioxidants—thus modulating ROS‐based signalling (Brunetti, Fini, Sebastiani, Gori, & Tattini, 2018). This may be supported by observation that the production of most medicinally useful plant compounds is generally increased by exposure of the plant to UV, including Cannabis sativa (Zhang & Bjorn, 2009).
However, like nearly all life, plants are largely dependent on the generation of a proton gradient to generate ATP, which is itself driven by electrons flowing through a highly conserved ETC: the main difference between photosynthesis and respiration is the source of electrons. Critically, as over‐reduction of the ETC can create damaging free radicals, as can collapse of the proton gradient, this system evolved complex mechanisms to control both proton and electron leak, and thus, adaptive signalling; for instance, mitochondria may need to work at an intermediate redox state (Aon, Cortassa, & O'Rourke, 2010; Cortassa, O'Rourke, & Aon, 2014). This might explain why mitochondria and chloroplasts retain genes that are part of a localised redox regulatory system (Allen, 2015). This seems to put mitochondria centre stage in determining ageing and pathology, and thus, lifespan (Lane, 2005).
In this paper, we outline the idea that the base property of many secondary plant metabolites is that they can both directly, and indirectly, modulate mitochondrial function because they represent an ancient structural principle, which was possibly driven by presence of UV and a proton gradient. This was the creation, and then selection, of compounds containing conjugated double bond systems that have the dual ability to both absorb light efficiently, and potentially act as sunscreens, but also modulate redox, and where necessary, generate an adaptive signal. These properties have been amplified and adopted, in effect, accreted, from abiotic geothermal/light driven chemistry via addition of more complex protein/lipid‐based systems to ensure homeostasis in an ever‐changing environment. Evolution has, through its ‘tinkering’ (Jacob, 1977), found many new uses for them to enhance resistance to stress. In short, if life can be viewed as a ‘dissipative’ structure, then these compounds can fine tune this process in response to environmental stress.
In terms of medicine, a key component of ageing and many diseases is chronic inflammation (Furman et al., 2019), which can be viewed as the decrease in efficacy of a feedback system that controls the flow of electrons. Inflammation, it could be said, simply represents an evolved system that is triggered when electron flow is altered, either by damage, infection or other severe environmental stress, to correct the problem. It therefore represents a hormetic system, as the stress initiates an adaptive programme that should resolve it, if it does not, then the system eventually fails and is thus subject to natural selection. Thus, controlling it is a priority. Hence, the modulation of inflammation by many plant compounds could be explained by their evolved function in stress protection: at low doses they would amplify a ROS‐based signal (in effect, an electron leak), which in some systems would appear to be inflammatory. However, with time, and/or higher doses, this would shift towards being anti‐inflammatory to limit the response to prevent a vicious positive feedback cycle. This would be associated with an increased capacity to flow electrons safely, for instance, by enhancing mitochondrial capacity, and thus the ability to dissipate energy or excess electrons. This paradigm would be reflected in their ability to inhibit proliferation of cancer cells and pathogens, which are problems common to both plants and animals. This could be explained by their basic physical properties to ‘dissipate’ energy, and by subsequent evolution of proteins that enhanced these principles, and by life in general being a dissipative structure.
2ORIGINS OF LIFE THEORIES AND EMERGING CONCEPTS
In order to understand how plant secondary metabolites are functioning as medicines, it may be helpful to review some theories on the origins of life as extant biochemistry reflects both pre‐life geochemistry and photochemistry. This of course is generally a speculative subject, as there are still several competing theories, such as the genetics first idea (replication first in warm ponds, for instance), metabolism first (thermal vents), as well as vesicle first (lipids), with many of the chemicals necessary being delivered from inter‐ and circumstellar environments (Jheeta, 2016). Most of these models rely on the existence of a ‘privileged function’, such as replication for the ribonucleic acid (RNA) world, in metabolism first models, it is autocatalytic networks in an energy gradient, such as a hydrothermal vent, and in membrane worlds, compartmentalisation. Another way of looking at this is the universal gene set and the molecular toolbox—that is, which components are common to all life suggesting its most ancient requirements, such as 53 universal genes involved in translation, 28 amino acids, coenzyme A, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) and certain ribonucleotides (Lanier & Williams, 2017). Plus, all of these would have embraced the control of ions such as calcium, which itself seems to have been a key player in evolution (Kazmierczak, Kempe, & Kremer, 2013; Plattner & Verkhratsky, 2015).
Two major theories involve life starting in an alkaline thermal vent and some variations of a UV‐driven process, with the possibility of some amalgam of these. What is clear is that both a proton gradient, and chemistry based on UV‐absorbing compounds, is critical today. There are many theories on the origins of life, and it is beyond the scope of this article to review them all, but the reader is directed to books such as that by Smith and Morowtiz (Morowitz & Smith, 2016) or Egel, Lankenau and Mulkidjanian (Egel, Lankenau, & Mulkidjanian, 2011), or Nick Lane (Lane, 2015).
Briefly, as an example, one of the most recent suggestions is that the conditions necessary for life, and the origins of the RNA/proteins, could be combined with a prebiotic information system that evolved in a hydrothermal impact crater lake. This could have had the necessary geothermal chemistry, ingredients from meteorites and dry/wet cycling, with UV being important in generating the compounds in space (Chatterjee, 2016; Chatterjee & Yadav, 2019). Thus, although any origin of life theory is still somewhat speculative, it is fair to say that both UV and proton gradients may well have been important. Critically, however it actually started, it is very likely that life has to have its roots in thermodynamics and quantum mechanics, and likely centres on self‐organisation in dissipative structures involving complexity theory, where fluctuations in energy can produce order out of chaos (Pulselli, Simoncini, & Tiezzi, 2009; Trevors, 2011). In short, life can be viewed as a localised ordered system that although it seems to go against the second law of thermodynamics, actually drives the thermodynamic equilibration of the universe. Key in this is its ability to use information (Michel, 2013).
2.1Life as a dissipative structure based on a proton gradient
The concept that life is a dissipative structure, obeying the laws of entropy, underlies one of the strongest theories involving the proton gradient and alkaline geothermal vents, as proposed by Nick Lane in his book ‘The vital question: why is life the way it is?’ (Lane, 2015). Based on this theory, the evolution of photosynthesis would have emerged later and utilised the components of the ETC chain to harness light powered generation of electrons from hydrogen or hydrogen sulphide, in effect, anoxygenic photosynthesis. In this model, UV would have been far too damaging as the emerging cellular life would not have evolved the protective UV systems present in modern phototrophs. However, phototrophy may have then started as organisms started to harness the very low levels of light emitted from the hydrothermal vents themselves—so called ‘geothermal light’. Then, with time, and exposure to light, these systems would have evolved eventually leading to modern oxygenic photosynthesis (Martin, Bryant, & Beatty, 2017). Key in this process, which ultimately led to the great oxidation event, was the ability to utilise water as an electron source and the ability to control excessive electron production under high light conditions, and thus, ROS production, which resulted in the co‐evolution of anti‐oxidant systems (Hamilton, 2019).
In short, one theory on the origins of life suggests it is dissipative and started in alkaline hydrothermal vents and is now dependent on using electrons to drive the formation of a hydrogen gradient, which can either be derived via chemolithotrophy or photolithotrophy, but where UV may well have been too disruptive to begin with. However, once life began to use light, it had to deal with the problem of the generation of ROS.
2.2Life as a structure based on the dissipation of the solar potential
Clearly, one of the most important steps in the evolution of life was storage of information in molecules like DNA or RNA. The origins of the RNA world are still being debated. However, the formation of nucleotides and their polymerisation into molecules like RNA in ‘warm little ponds’ from nucleobases delivered from meteorites due to wet‐dry cycles and the effects of UV, is certainly a strong competing theory to their formation in thermal vents, which may only produce very short nucleotides (Pearce, Pudritz, Semenov, & Henning, 2017). Because of the extreme UV levels on early earth, one school of thought is that the ancestors of RNA nucleobases must have been very good at absorbing this energy and converting it into heat, for instance, barbituric acid and 2,4,6‐triaminopyrimidine (Brister, Pollum, & Crespo‐Hernandez, 2016). In fact it has been observed that many prebiotic chemicals essential for life, in particular aromatic compounds, can also be generated in interstellar/circumstellar environments (Cuadrado et al., 2017; Pearce et al., 2017; Tachibana et al., 2017), suggesting that UV did play a role in creating life's ingredients.
UV may have then continually driven the increasing complexity of molecules by enabling natural selection of photo‐stable nucleotides, perhaps at the interface between thermal vents and sunlight. One hypothesis suggests that the very earliest ‘organisms’ (proto‐life) utilised light as one of the potential source of energy, but as the conditions on the early earth changed and oxygen levels rose, evolution drove the need to utilise other energy sources, such as sodium and proton gradients (Egel et al., 2011; Ranjan, Todd, Sutherland, & Sasselov, 2018).
A similar idea is the ‘UltraViolet and Temperature Assisted mechanism for Reproduction’ (UVTAR) hypothesis, which also describes the origins of RNA and DNA. This theory is based on the idea that the temperature of the early Achaean sea was close to the melting temperature of polymers of these molecules. When exposed to high levels of UV, and other organic molecules and salt, together with the diurnal cycle of heating and cooling, these circumstances would have been ideal to start to select for the most efficient energy dissipating polymers with no need for enzymes. This is because these polymers are more efficient than single nucleotides at taking the energy in a UV photon to the ground state. The temperature of the surface of the early earth, about 3.8 Gyr ago, could have been as high 80°C. The other factor here is the link between information and entropy: as the seas cooled below the annealing temperature of the proto‐DNA/RNA this may have resulted in the selection of molecules that held information that enabled them to dissipate energy more effectively, especially if they combined with molecules such as aromatic ring amino acids, which enhance the breadth of the spectrum of UV absorption. As the seas cooled, combinations of amino acids, which lowered the denaturing temperature still further, would have led to ever greater complexity. It may thus be relevant that purple bacteria, perhaps the most ancient of photosynthetic organisms, employ bacteriochlorophyll in their reaction centres that absorb UV light at 280 and 400 nm, suggesting this could have been a very primitive and early photosynthetic system. This might suggest an alternative explanation of chemoautotrophs; they migrated to thermal vents and evolved to use infrared light first, then started to utilise the energy in these gradients. Today, bacteriorhodopsin, as well as utilising light at 568 nm, can also absorb light at 280 nm by using the aromatic amino acids, tyrosine and tryptophan. Chlorophyll emerged as the atmosphere changed, reducing UV and enhancing longer wavelengths absorption. This hypothesis thus moves the function of life away from ‘self‐perpetuation’ towards the dissipation of the solar flux by its ability to couple it to the earth's water cycle (Michaelian, 2011, 2017).
It is worth emphasising that all these theories point towards a critical role of UV in life's beginnings, in particular, by selecting for molecules that could dissipate its energy.
2.3Cofactors or prefactors: Building on the properties of ancient molecules
The above theories suggest at least three scenarios: metabolism first, with gradual genetic take over; replication first then metabolism; or that replication and metabolism were shared right from the beginning. One observation is that many essential coenzymes display UV absorption spectra, such as the B vitamins (Knak, Regensburger, Maisch, & Baumler, 2014; Monteverde, Gomez‐Consarnau, Suffridge, & Sanudo‐Wilhelmy, 2017). Critically, the central components of the ETC, such as the cytochromes and ubiquinone, as well as the flavins and NAD, all have associated absorption spectra, ranging from the UV to visible. Their spectra change according to their redox status, which certainly in the case of NAD(P)H and FAD+, as they fluoresce, has not only become a mechanism to image mitochondria, but also to monitor metabolism (Shuttleworth, 2010). NADH has an absorbance band at 300–350 nm and emits at 430–450 nm, and in water, shows a very high quantum yield in ejecting an electron of 0.46—but a much lower fluorescence quantum yield, which is about 0.02 (Boldridge, Morton, & Scott, 1984). This might indicate that under high UV levels NADH could generate a lot of electrons, which could affect the ETC and lead to the formation of NAD+. Certainly mitochondria are very sensitive to UV light, and can generate ROS when exposed to it (Gniadecki, Thorn, Vicanova, Petersen, & Wulf, 2000).
However, at lower UV intensities, could NAD act as a sunscreen? NADH has an absorption coefficient of about 6,317 L mol−1 cm−1 at 340 nm (McComb, Bond, Burnett, Keech, & Bowers Jr., 1976), which although at the lower end, is in the same range as commercially available sunscreens that exhibit absorption coefficients from 4,300 for homosalate X (based on salicylic acid), to over 20,000 for some of the cinnamates (Shaath, 2010). Moreover, both NADH and NAD+ also absorb at 260 nm, so although NAD+ is not fluorescent, it can still absorb UV. Thus, although both of forms of NAD could act as sunscreens, it could also hint at how UV may have played a role in its origins as a key component of redox and energy metabolism; these factors were probably inter‐linked.
If these observations are combined with the UVTAR theory, in particular, if very early organisms could use UV for photosynthesis, which some still apparently can do (Haas et al., 2018), then the suggestion that mitochondria may have descended from a purple non‐sulphur bacterium, where the cristae may have been part of the light harvesting mechanism (Munoz‐Gomez, Wideman, Roger, & Slamovits, 2017), is interesting. It has been suggested that the core components of the ETC, the cytochrome bc complexes, may have originally evolved as part of a light harvesting system, but switched function as oxygen levels increased (Dibrova, Shalaeva, Galperin, & Mulkidjanian, 2017). NAD could have played a number of roles in these circumstances.
Of possible relevance here is the importance of tryptophan, a UV absorbing molecule that is also degraded by UV, but can also be generated by abiotic chemistry, and its importance in the extant NAD+ synthesis pathway. It could be argued that the photo‐chemical properties of tryptophan have become imprinted by the evolution of enzymes, in effect, accretion. This would suggest that ancient stress resistance pathways, such as those involving the sirtuins, could have originally evolved in response to UV. Not only are sirtuins an ancient central adaptive pathway to oxidative stress involving mitochondrial function that modulate ageing (Greiss & Gartner, 2009; Singh et al., 2017), but they are also involved in UV‐induced DNA repair, and require NAD+ as a cofactor (Fan & Luo, 2010). Interestingly, as it is now thought that NADH could well have been generated by prebiotic chemistry, as could peptides containing cysteine residues. These could have come together in an Fe‐S cluster in proto‐cells to generate a pH gradient; this has been demonstrated in vesicles (Bonfio et al., 2018). Critically, it has also been suggested that UV was key in the prebiotic synthesis of Fe‐S clusters, which are central to the ETC (Bonfio et al., 2017).
It is thus appears likely that life largely utilises an ETC that relies on compounds that have structures that enable them to both absorb UV and act in redox reactions to maintain a proton gradient. These UV absorbing compounds are also key in information storage, such as DNA and RNA, but also share structural similarities to the main energy currency in the cell, ATP, as well as NAD. Thus the natural selection of relatively photo‐stable and redox‐stable molecules does seem to have been key in the origins of life, as is the smooth flow of electrons when there are large variations of energy input.
It may therefore be significant that the ETC could well be utilising electron tunnelling, which could be key in how it tunes itself to changes in the environment (de Vries, Dorner, Strampraad, & Friedrich, 2015; Moser, Farid, Chobot, & Dutton, 2006), suggesting that hormesis could also be viewed as a way of maintaining significant quantum tunnelling in mitochondria (Nunn, Guy, & Bell, 2016). Indeed, it has been suggested that proteins have evolved to exist at quantum criticality (Vattay, Salahub, Csabai, Nassimi, & Kaufmann, 2015), as exemplified by the environment‐assisted quantum transport (ENAQT) theory (Zerah‐Harush & Dubi, 2018). This suggests that biology may have selected for quantum transport mechanisms to enhance the efficiency and robustness of energy transport in biological systems; key in this is that proteins may enhance the innate exciton transfer ability of chromophores by ensuring long lived ‘coherence’ by a form of vibronic resonance (Rathbone et al., 2018a, 2018b). This coherence is mostly discussed in relation to light harvesting systems, but may well be more broadly applicable to many biological systems to maintain robustness (Scholes et al., 2017) when electrons are also considered. In biological terms, cofactors are often described as enabling the functional properties of proteins because they enable redox activity and electron transport, and usually take the form of metal complexes, cytochromes or flavins. It is thus relevant that researchers looking into protein bioelectronics discuss ‘doping’ proteins to enhance electron transport with compounds such as hemin (Bostick et al., 2018).
In summary, it could thus be speculated that life is built on chromophoric molecules whose inherent light absorbing and electron transfer characteristics have been amplified by proteins to ensure robust energy dissipation—possibly by enhancing fundamental quantum principles. So the reality is that ‘cofactors’ are probably much more likely to be ‘prefactors’, as they were simple molecules that were generated abiotically, and proteins evolved around them and quite possibly, through a process like ENAQT, enhanced the ability of these systems to extend quantum effects further into the mesoscopic realm.
5SUMMARY OF THEORY
5.1Ageing and the loss of complexity
Ageing, it seems, is associated with a gradual loss of the ability to main complexity (Jazwinski & Kim, 2019). Equally, maintenance of efficient electron flow through the mitochondrial ETC to prevent excessive reduction seems to be an evolutionary step to increase lifespan by slowing the ageing process, which, as it fails, is associated with a whole series of age‐related diseases that eventually lead to death (Lane, 2005). In contrast, deliberately redirecting electrons as a stress signal to invoke repair and as an anti‐pathogen strategy in inflammation is also a key function of mitochondria (Banoth & Cassel, 2018; Meyer et al., 2018). Although mounting an immune response is essential for survival, chronic inflammation seems to play a fundamental role in many diseases and is associated with a gradual loss of mitochondrial function (Lane, 2003; Salminen et al., 2008; Salminen, Ojala, Kaarniranta, & Kauppinen, 2012).
In effect, as an organism ages, the ability to maintain a controlled dissipation of energy is slowly lost, which is commensurate with a loss of structure and rising stress. During life, there is a constant process of renewal, in effect, natural selection of the fittest components to maintain this dissipation. However, this process seems to eventually fail leading to ageing and death. Within this paradigm is the concept that order can arise out of chaos if a system is perturbed: this implies that for life to maintain its optimum structure, it has to be constantly exposed to a degree of stress, which could be called hormesis (Nunn, Guy, & Bell, 2017). The bottom line is that although nearly all organisms age, the rate that they age can be varied by the amount and kind of stress they receive; they need enough to ‘remind’ the structure to exist, but too much destroys it.
5.2The role of inflammation resolution and calcium hormesis
One of the observations about many plant extracts is that they are primarily viewed as anti‐inflammatory. However, data suggest at lower concentrations they could actually be inflammatory, and it is only at higher concentrations they become anti‐inflammatory (Schink et al., 2018), suggesting a hormetic process (Calabrese et al., 2019). From the plant's perspective, this supports their role in signalling/adaptation to stress, which probably evolved from their general ability to dissipate solar output and deal with free radicals. Because plants and animals evolved from a common ancestor, and thus contain mitochondria, the basic stress adaptive systems of animals could respond in a similar way.
In general, it could be surmised that the compartmentalisation and timing of calcium signalling could be important; initial ingress of calcium into the cell, or release from the ER, could actually have a mild stimulatory effect—including on the mitochondria. However, this enhancement of mitochondrial function, perhaps coupled with a direct interaction with mitochondria to further enhance mitochondrial uptake of calcium, could act to reduce the proliferative signal. Life relies on the maintenance of a charge across a membrane, which is in effect, a store of energy; most of the time this is driven by extracting energy from electron flow. So, an influx of calcium into the mitochondrion could potentially dissipate this potential, which is presumably why calcium also stimulates mitochondrial function. It could therefore be predicted that compounds that induce calcium flow into a mitochondrion, stimulating its function and thus ROS generation, could be linked to an ability to both alter ROS signalling from complex 1, as well altering ATPase, for instance, to induce uncoupling, would be used to generate a retrograde signal to the nucleus. In fact, mitonuclear signalling can be viewed as being hormetic and bidirectional (Quiros, Mottis, & Auwerx, 2016).
A key outcome of hormesis is therefore to stimulate an increased capacity to flow electrons over time, which would have an anti‐inflammatory effect. This could be achieved by well‐described mitophagy and mitochondrial biogenesis, effectively resulting in newer and fully functional mitochondria. However, there is also evidence that bits of mitochondria can be recycled via generation of vesicles containing damaged components (mitochondrial‐derived vesicles, or MDVs), which may involve VDAC (Roberts, Tang, Fon, & Durcan, 2016). Indeed, it is now becoming clear that MDVs are involved in multiple processes, ranging from inflammation (Puhm et al., 2019) to anti‐bacterial functions (Abuaita, Schultz, & O'Riordan, 2018); the origins of this derive from the observation that prokaryotes also produce vesicles (Toyofuku, Nomura, & Eberl, 2019). The fact that many plant compounds modulate VDAC could thus be part of this adaptive process.
5.3Medicinal plant compounds tune the stress response
It could therefore be argued that these plant compounds can very finely tune the cellular response to stress. Indeed, there does seem to be some evidence that rather than mitochondria being viewed as a giant energy generating unit, they are actually much more likely to consist of multiple linked bioenergetic units based on individual cristae (Wolf et al., 2019), which suggests individual units could fail and be removed. This might also support the underlying hypothesis as to why mitochondria retain some genes to allow for localised redox feedback (Allen, 2015). In relation to this more subtle form of mitochondrial component renewal, we and others have shown that CBD can modulate extracellular vesicle production, both in cancer cells and in bacteria (Kosgodage et al., 2018; Kosgodage, Matewele, et al., 2019; Kosgodage, Uysal‐Onganer, et al., 2019). This may well indicate that vesicle modulation is part of how CBD may be working.
In terms of the stress response, one of the most important signalling hubs in all eukaryotes is the target of rapamycin (TOR) complex, which seems to be critical in interpreting environmental and internal signals to control the switch between stress resistance and growth, and thus, determining lifespan. New data is now showing that it can be associated with MAMs and VDAC1 (Betz et al., 2013; Ramanathan & Schreiber, 2009), and is now thought to play an integrated role with mitochondria in determining longevity (Wei, Zhang, Cai, & Xu, 2015). As it fulfils many of the same functions in plants (Rodriguez, Parola, Andreola, Pereyra, & Martinez‐Noel, 2019), this might suggest that these plant medicinal compounds can also modulate the TOR complex in animals. It is therefore of interest that phenolic terpenoids, such as thymol and carvacol, which can inhibit fungal growth, seem to mimic calcium stress by inducing calcium ingress and inhibiting mTOR (Rao, Zhang, Muend, & Rao, 2010). Thymol can also alter mitochondrial function and enhance ROS (Deb, Parimala, Saravana Devi, & Chakraborty, 2011). It is thus of relevance that TORC2, a complex of TOR, seems to inhibit calcineurin by suppressing mitochondrial ROS and the activation of the calcium channel regulatory protein, Mid 1 (Vlahakis, Lopez Muniozguren, & Powers, 2017).
5.4Prefactor chromophores and modern sunscreens
To conclude, it is possible that the natural selection of chromophoric molecules that originally could dissipate the energy in light, both as photons or electrons, has led to them becoming key moieties in a more generalised stress‐signalling hormetic system, that certainly in eukaryotes, is focussed around mitochondrial function. This system may well parallel a much more ancient set of circumstances that led to life itself. It could be said that medicinal plant compounds engender a negative feedback shift leading to structural stabilisation through dissipation. Figure 3 summarises this idea, and displays it against the well‐described relationship between calcium and mitochondrial function.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.