Radical Revelations: The Interplay of Nitrosative Stress, the Endocannabinoid System, and Treatment of Age-Related Disorders.

Abstract

The crosstalk between the endocannabinoid system (ECS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) has emerged as an important area of investigation in recent years. Although many aspects of this interaction remain elusive, accumulating evidence demonstrates that the ECS plays a critical role in regulating RNS-mediated signaling under physiological conditions. This modulation can be either inhibitory or stimulatory, depending on the specific receptor subtype, cell type, and tissue location involved. While ECS-RNS interactions support normal cellular homeostasis, their dysregulation contributes to various disease states, particularly neurodegenerative disorders. Studies in both rodent models and human subjects show that ECS modulation can reduce anxiety, attenuate neuroinflammatory responses, and slow disease progression in neurodegenerative conditions. This review examines how cannabinoid-based interventions modulate nitrosative stress and neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and Parkinson’s disease (PD), highlighting their potential as targeted therapeutics that address multiple pathological mechanisms simultaneously and may offer advantages over conventional treatment approaches.

Untitled section

Keywords: endocannabinoid, reactive nitrogen species, redox environment, nitrosative stress, nitrergic signaling, Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s

Article notes

Untitled section

Received 2026 Jan 22; Revised 2026 Mar 13; Accepted 2026 Mar 15; Collection date 2026 Mar.

Author notes

1. The Endocannabinoid System

1.1. Synthesis

The endocannabinoid system (ECS) is an endogenous neuromodulatory system critical to synaptic plasticity, central nervous system development, and cellular signaling [1]. The endocannabinoid system is composed of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) such as CB1R and CB2R, endocannabinoids, and many enzymes such as fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) which aid in the synthesis and degradation of endocannabinoids [2,3,4]. Cannabinoids are broadly split into endogenous cannabinoids (AEA and 2-AG), phytocannabinoidstetrahydrocannabinol THC) and cannabidiol (CBD), and synthetic cannabinoids (dronabinol and nabilone) which all vary in ECS activation and subsequent downstream signaling cascades [5,6]. Ubiquitous expression of cannabinoid receptors and their numerous signaling pathways involves this system in many biological functions such as hunger, memory, learning, metabolism, sleep and mood regulation [7,8].

Endocannabinoids are endogenous lipids that activate cannabinoid receptors, the most well studied of which are arachidonoyl ethanolamide (AEA) and 2-archidonoyl glycerol (2-AG) [1]. AEA is generated from a membrane phospholipid precursor enzyme known as N-acylphosphatidylethanolamine (NAPE) spurred by the enzyme NAPE-hydrolyzing phospholipase D (NAPE-PLD) [9,10]. 2-AG production is mainly activated by phospholipase C (PLC)-attenuated cleavage of membrane phosphatidylinositols, which activates a diacylglycerol (DAG) precursor [11]. Hydrolysis via DAG-lipase activity then initiates the formation of 2-AG [12]. Endocannabinoids are synthesized at the post-synaptic neuron and can easily pass through the phospholipid bilayer to activate CB1Rs on the presynaptic neuron, in a process known as retrograde transmission [13,14]. This retrograde signaling allows endocannabinoids to mediate both short-term and long-term plasticity for both excitatory and inhibitory synapses, as demonstrated in Figure 1.

Figure 1Retrograde transmission in the endocannabinoid system. Arachidonoyl ethanolamide (AEA) and 2-archidonoyl glycerol (2-AG) are synthesized at the post-synaptic neuron signaled by an activated receptor or voltage-gated channels respectively. Activation of the CB1 receptor on the presynaptic neuron inhibits adenylyl cyclase, the production of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), protein kinase A (PKA), and overall phosphorylation. CB1R activation also activates mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) which goes on to inhibit voltage-gated channels, preventing the firing of the cell. Created with BioRender.com.

1.2. ECS Receptors Differentiation and Function

Within the ECS, the most well-known and thoroughly studied receptors are CB1R, CB2R, and TRPV1 [15,16]. Each receptor is densely populated in specific tissues with CB1R found primarily in the central nervous system (CNS) and CB2R mainly located on immune cells [7]. While TRPV1 has been found throughout the central and peripheral nervous system, they are primarily located on peripheral sensory neurons [15,16]. CB1R and CB2R are unique GPCR’s in that they are able to recognize and bind with more than one endogenous ligand [17,18].

TRPV1 receptors, the least understood of the cannabinoid receptors, are non-selective cation ligand-gated channels highly permeable to Ca²⁺ [16]. Activation of the TRPV1 receptor causes an influx of calcium, resulting in muscle contractions, neurotransmitter release, and membrane excitability [19,20]. TRPV1 receptors, activated by noxious heat and certain vanilloids such as capsaicin, play a role in initiating thermal nociception [20,21]. Previous studies have utilized TRPV1 antagonists, namely capsazepine or AMG9810 to reduce chronic intractable pain due to cancer, migraines, AIDs, and chronic cough via its anti-inflammatory properties, demonstrating therapeutic potential for its usage in chronic pain disorders [16].

The location of these different cannabinoid receptors within the body are often indicative of their effects. CB1R activation can lead to changes in behavior, memory, movement, and cognition with high concentrations in the neocortex, hippocampus, basal ganglia, cerebellum, and brainstem [22,23]. Clinical trials found activation of CB1R alone showed promising results in ameliorating the psychological and behavioral symptoms of dementia such as reductions in nocturnal motor activity, aggression, anxiety-related motor activity (e.g., hand wringing) and restlessness [24,25]. The authors theorized these changes may be due to neurotransmitter modulation, reduced oxidative stress and neuroinflammation, and reduced tau hyperphosphorylation as well as reduced amyloid-related neurotoxicity [24,25]. Moreover, activation of CB1R in the CNS has been shown to inhibit murine glutamate release, decreasing excitatory signaling between neurons and decreasing anxious behaviors [2,26,27]. Studies where mice lacking CB1 receptors reliably show increased avoidance in tasks measuring anxious behaviors, including the Elevated Plus Maze (EPM), Open Field Test, and the Light-Dark Box Task [22]. These and other similar findings bolster the suggested role of endogenous CB1 receptors in anxiolytic functions. Additionally, CB1R deletion from GABAergeic interneurons specifically showed increased anxious behavior, whereas deletion from glutamatergic neurons were associated with a lower stress response [28].

The CB2 receptor, found primarily on immune cells, has therapeutic potential for diseases characterized by inflammatory dysregulation via modulation of immune activity and release of inflammatory mediators [29,30]. Importantly, inflammatory dysregulation is a hallmark of nitrosative and oxidative stress contributing to neurodegeneration, particularly in disorders like Alzheimer’s (AD) and Parkinson’s (PD). These associations lead to the possibility of new therapeutic developments involving the modulation of these receptors in the alleviation of cognitive impairments and maladaptive inflammation. However, further investigation into the cellular circuity of cannabinoid receptors and its effects on the inflammatory microenvironment is needed.

1.3. Mitochondria, RNS, and Nitrosative Stress

Mitochondrial dysfunction [31,32,33] is linked to a wide range of conditions, including neurodegenerative diseases like Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s, metabolic disorders, and aging. Mitochondria are responsible for producing most of the cell’s energy in the form of ATP (adenosine triphosphate) through cellular respiration [34]. Mitochondria have a distinctive double-membrane structure [32], with the inner membrane being heavily folded into structures called cristae. These folds increase surface area for energy production, but they are also the source of mitochondrial nitric oxide synthase (mtNOS), a major driver in reactive nitrogen species (RNS) production. Mitochondrial mechanisms such as fission, fussion, and mitophagy are crucial for the regulation of their structure and functionality [33,35,36]. As an organism ages, structural features of mitochondria are altered and can result in physiological flaws such as decreases in mitochondrial dynamics and decreased functioning [36,37]. Such as example can be seen in the cristae structure of mitochondria, the location of oxidative phosphorylation [36]. Vue et al. found that mitochondrial morphology in aged rodent muscle cells display an overall smaller size and decrease connectivity of mitochondrial networks [36].

Reactive nitrogen species are nitric-oxide-derived compounds with unique cell signaling mechanisms that result in post-translational modifications and interactions with reactive oxygen species (ROS) [38]. However, increased levels of RNS can induce cellular damage, causing a decrease in cellular functioning and apoptosis [39]. Over time, it has become clear that RNS are not solely detrimental to the cellular environment but play a necessary role in retrograde cellular signaling. Regular levels of RNS are crucial for brain functioning—including synaptic plasticity—but can become detrimental if RNS levels are elevated [40,41]. This network is mediated by both endogenous and exogenous antioxidants (AO), molecules that exhibit a neuroprotective capacity via inhibition of lipid peroxidation which can induce cellular damage [42,43]. An imbalance of AO and RNS results in nitrosative stress, causing disastrous effects on cellular health—including alterations to protein structure, subsequent impairment of mitochondrial function, and disruption of cellular signaling [44,45]. This discord in the microenvironment is implicated in diseases such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, multiple sclerosis (MS), and several other neuroinflammatory disorders [46].

In the brain, neuronal mitochondria are the main source of free radicals, specifically in Complex I and III of the electron transport chain [47]. At physiological levels, mitochondrial ROS serve essential neuronal functions modulating synaptic plasticity, Ca²⁺ channels, and Ca²⁺/Calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) to support long-term potentiation, the cellular mechanism underlying learning and memory [48]. ROS exert these effects by directly modifying mitochondrial Ca²⁺ transport proteins which subsequently alters mitochondrial Ca²⁺ uptake [49]. ROS exerts these effects by directly modifying mitochondrial Ca²⁺ transport proteins, thereby altering mitochondrial Ca²⁺ uptake, and by activating ryanodine receptors (RyRs) on the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane to trigger Ca²⁺ release [49]. The ER and mitochondria are physically coupled at mitochondria endoplasmic reticulum contact sites (MERCs), where the close proximity creates high local Ca²⁺ concentrations that facilitate efficient transfer into the mitochondria matrix through the mitochondrial calcium uniporter (MCU) complex. Initially, increased mitochondrial Ca²⁺ uptake boosts oxidative phosphorylation, however, excessive Ca²⁺ triggers the opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP), amplifying ROS release and initiating cell death pathways including apoptosis and autophagy [50].

Mitochondrial Ca²⁺ uptake promotes ROS generation, further triggering Ca²⁺ release from the ER, and enhancing mitochondrial uptake of Ca²⁺ at MERCs [50]. This positive feedback loop promotes further ROS generation and forms a cycle of damage. Excess ROS levels overload mitochondrial Ca²⁺ levels, triggering the opening of mPTP and leading to mitochondrial dysfunction and cell death [50].

Nitric oxide (NO) is a reactive nitrogen species produced by most cells in the conversion of l-arginine to citrulline and is unique in its ability to cross the phospholipid barrier and bind with the presynaptic neuron [51]. NO upregulation can be activated by three differing nitric oxide synthases (NOS): neuronal NOS (nNOS), endothelial NOS (eNOS), or inducible NOS (iNOS) [51]. Both nNOS and eNOS are enzymes that require calmodulin and calcium to become activated, whereas iNOS is induced in response to an inflammatory event such as neurodegenerative disease, tissue injury, hypoxia, and specific pro-inflammatory mediators like cytokines [52,53]. NOS in a balanced system are necessary for synaptic plasticity and long-term potentiation (LTP), a process critical to strengthening synaptic connections as well as memory formation. Following N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor activation by NOS, NO acts as a retrograde messenger to the presynaptic neuron via upregulation of the enzyme guanylate cyclase, resulting in an increase in cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) and subsequent enhanced release of glutamate [40]. This cascade results in sustained and amplified synaptic signaling [40].

N-omega-Nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), a non-selective NOS inhibitor, has been shown to decrease NO levels and negatively affect long-term potentiation [54]. In a study by Hopper and Garthwaite [55], rodents were injected with L-NAME and received continuous stimulation to an area of their hippocampus. Extracellular recordings of the field excitatory post-synaptic potentials (fEPSPs) were measured to investigate the effect of NOS on LTP. In healthy controls, the fEPSPs became elevated for the duration of the stimulus—which results in the LTP. However, rodents injected with L-NAME showed decreased hippocampal firing an hour after continuous stimulation—suggesting blockade of NOS by L-NAME obstructed LTP due to the failure to maintain synaptic response over time [55]. In the same study, administration of l-arginine—a precursor to NOS activation—reversed the effects of L-NAME on LTP, emphasizing the necessity of NOS activation for the formation of LTP.

Phosphorylation of nNOS by cAMP -dependent protein kinase [42], protein kinase C (PKC) [56], or CAMKII has been shown to decrease nNOS activity, and therefore decrease NO production [57]. cAMP, PKC, and CAMKII NO have been found to activate soluble guanylyl cyclase, a catalyst to the production of cGMP [56]. This cyclic guanosine monophosphate is a key messenger thought to indirectly activate protein kinase G (PKG), which significantly impacts protein phosphorylation [58,59].

Cannabinoid agonists can stimulate the production of cGMP and the translocation of guanylyl cyclase in neurons, influencing hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide gated channels, leading to changes in synaptic plasticity and long-term potentiation [27,60]. These shared signal transduction mechanisms imply a prospective functional relationship between the ECS and RNS systems as cAMP, PKC, and CAMKII all participate in ECS receptor activation and subsequent downstream signaling, although the exact interaction has yet to be fully elucidated [61].

NO can directly bond to reactants in a process known as nitrosylation, a process where NO-derived free radicals can form nitrate proteins and lipids effectively changing their functionality, and wreaking havoc upon the cellular environment [62,63]. The combination of NO and a superoxide anion form peroxynitrite (ONOO-) which is a highly reactive anion shown to impede cellular functioning, via lipid peroxidation [62,63]. ONOO-build-up has been proven to increase post-translational modification of DNA including protein nitration as well as perturb cellular functioning via lipid peroxidation and/or DNA degradation [64,65]. The addition of a nitrosonium ion (NO+) to a nucleophilic group (nitrosation) has similarly been proven to have a key role in cellular signaling while also negatively contributing to the accumulation of RNS [40]. In a study using s-nitrosation (nitrosation of a cysteine thiol) of connexin 43 within murine cardiac tissue, researchers found increased mitochondrial permeability—particularly for potassium ions—resulting in increased ROS formation and disequilibrium of the cellular redox system [66]. Nitration, the addition of a nitro group (-NO2) into amino acid debris, has proven to make functional alterations in proteins, such as heat shock protein 60 and 90, which reside within the mitochondria, and maintain protein homeostasis [67,68,69,70]. DNA and mitochondrial damage are linked to many age-related disorders, suggesting the blockage of excess nitration as a possible intervention.

1.4. Molecular Mechanisms of Mediation

The interaction between the ECS, the accumulation of RNS, and nitrosative stress, although yet to be fully understood, provides potential treatment avenues for NOS-related disorders. It has proven more difficult to examine the crosstalk of the ECS and RNS systems in healthy individuals, although some in vitro studies have suggested autocrine regulation to be one of the many regulatory functions of the interaction between the ECS and nNOS [61]. Moreover, CB1R and nNOS proteins are found in higher concentrations within the hypothalamus, suggesting functional interactions between these systems and hormone regulation [71].

Activation of either CB1R or CB2R can impede or ameliorate the activity of enzymes responsible for the synthesis of NO [72,73]. Kim et al. found that NOS activity is enhanced within the cortex of CB1R knockout mice, indicating that RNS levels are mediated by activation of the CB1 receptor [23,74]. Cannabinoid receptor activation may either suppress or increase the levels of cAMP within the cellular environment, which in turn inhibits or activates the PKA-attenuated production of enzymes responsible for the production of NOS [75] (Figure 2). AEA activation of CB1R can inhibit the activation of voltage-gated calcium channels, preventing the production of action potentials [62]. In rodent models, activation of CB1R inhibits the release of glutamate, decreasing neuronal excitation [22]. In contrary, activation of the TRPV1 receptor results in an influx of sodium and calcium, increasing neuronal excitation [16] and demonstrating that ECS receptors have drastically differing effects. NOS production can be modulated by an increase or decrease in action potential firing with subsequent increases or decreases in calmodulin binding and the activity of CAMKII [72]. When CAMKII, an enzyme responsible for decreasing nNOS activity and NO production, is inhibited, there is an increase in NO levels along a simultaneous decrease in superoxide generation—leading to a profound nitrosative imbalance [76,77]. Furthermore, the recycling of endocannabinoids by the COX enzyme, which converts arachidonic acid into prostanoids, results in prostaglandin metabolites that have been shown to mediate NOS activity shown in Figure 2 [72].

Figure 2Mediation of NOS production by the ECS. Endocannabinoids AEA and 2-AG activate the CB1 or TRPV1 receptor are broken down by COX enzyme into prostaglandin metabolites. CB1R activation leads to either inhibition or stimulation of cAMP, PKA. Created in BioRender.com.

A potential mechanism of neuroprotection is microglial CB2R activation which attenuates iNOS expression, shifting from a pro-inflammatory to an anti-inflammatory phenotype [78]. AM1241, a CB2 agonist, has been shown to attenuate microglial activation via reducing the expression of iNOS in rodent models, implicating the role of the ECS in the modulation of iNOS [79]. Furthermore, inhibition of FAAH via PF-3845 in a TBI mouse model resulted in suppressed iNOS expression alongside COX-2, whilst elevating AEA levels and thus reducing neurodegeneration [80]. Esposito et al. found that treating rat glioma cells with ACEA—a full CB1 agonist—prior to exposure of Abeta significantly reduced iNOS protein expression. Additionally, treating Abeta-stimulated cells with ACEA significantly reduced tau hyperphosphorylation in a concentration-dependent manner [81]. Studies utilizing WIN-55,212-2, a dual CB1/CB2 agonist, have found an overall increase in cell viability, while decreasing pro-inflammatory cytokines, COX-2 accumulation, and iNOS production [82]. These findings suggest that the ECS counteracts the iNOS inflammatory cascade at multiple levels.

The complex dynamics between the ECS and NOS are widely variable, and subsequent cellular effects are dependent on tissue type, ECS receptor expression, and NOS specificity. While more research is needed to parse out the interactions of the ECS and NOS in healthy individuals, current data shows promise for the development of therapeutics that work in combination to target these systems in neurodegenerative disease states.

ECS modulation of NOS activity extends to peripheral immune contexts. Gu et al. found that monoacylglycerol lipase (MAGL) accumulates in synovial tissue from patients with osteoarthritis (OA) alongside iNOS-positive M1-macrophages. Macrophages, an innate immune cell, is a key location of iNOS production [83]. Within the same study, mice in an OA model also displayed elevated MAGL and iNOS in synovial tissue [84]. Pharmacological inhibition of MAGL shifted macrophage polarization from the pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype, characterized by high levels of cytokines and iNOS, towards the anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype, characterized by increased arginase 1 expression. This transition was accompanied by reduced MAGL and iNOS expression, increased pain thresholds, and lower inflammation scores [84]. These findings suggest MAGL inhibition as a mechanism of iNOS expression in macrophages, providing an example of ECS-NOS crosstalk with direct implications for inflammatory disorders.

2. Therapeutic Potential of Cannabinoids in Aging and NOS-Related Disorders

2.1. Alzheimer’s Disease

Aso and colleagues [85] investigated the interaction between AD and the ECS utilizing knockout CB1R mice with the APP/PS1 genes—causing the animal to exhibit an early onset AD phenotype. They analyzed mice with a knockout of CB1R (−/−), heterozygous CB1R mice (−/+), and mice with overexpression of the CB1R gene (Cnr1). The absence of CB1R drastically reduced the survival rate of APP/PS1 mice, likely due to seizures caused by the imbalance of excitatory and inhibitory signaling [85]. Mice with reduced expression of CB1R (−/+) displayed accelerated memory decline between 3 and 6 months of age for mice with the AD phenotype [85,86]. A possible explanation for these findings is decreased levels of PSD-95 protein, a scaffolding protein within excitatory neurons, indicating synaptic dysfunction [87]. Overexpression of CB1R led to a more substantial decline in memory, demonstrating that the imbalance of CB1R causes deficits in memory retrieval and acquisition, similar to NOS accumulation.

Postmortem studies of brains taken from patients with AD have increased expression of CB2R’s on microglia within senile plagues [88,89]. However, CB1R expression is reduced in neurons distal to senile plaques [90,91]. FAAH, an endocannabinoid metabolizing enzyme, has also been found to be upregulated in senile plaques [92] and may contribute to the upregulation of anandamide metabolites. This cascade may be involved in increasing production of prostaglandins and pro-inflammatory cytokines in the AD brain.

The presence of FAAH in astrocytes proximal to senile plaques may participate in the reactive gliosis in regions with excess Aβ deposits [92,93]. These findings imply a compensatory mechanism in the AD brain to moderate levels of RNS via CB1R microglial expression. In rats with AD-type pathology, deposits of Aβ plaques and cognitive impairment were reversed by the non-selective CB1 and CB2 agonist WIN-55 212-22, and the CB2 selective agonist JWH-133 [92]. CB2R manipulation was only associated with activated microglia within or proximal to the plaques [92]. These findings imply a compensatory mechanism in the AD brain to moderate levels of RNS via CB receptor microglial expression. Benito and colleagues [92] hypothesize that the neuroprotective properties of cannabinoids are likely to include a downregulation of activity of transcription factors that lead to the production of inflammatory cytokines. The modulation of these inflammatory pathways could be used to treat AD pathology by targeting CB2R via its ability to halt or reverse the neuroinflammatory cycle (Figure 3).

Figure 3Neuroinflammation and the ECS in Alzheimer’s Disease.

2.2. Parkinson’s Disease and MS

NO can mediate neurotoxicity [94] and seems to play a role in the progression of neuroinflammatory disorders. Rodent models of Parkinson’s disease, a hypoactive motor disorder, treated with an NOS inhibitor or have a deletion of nNOS and iNOS genes, have significantly less MPP⁺-induced neurotoxicity [95,96]. Inhibition of NO production can therefore serve a protective role in decreasing DNA damage and cellular dysfunction. MS, another condition characterized by persistent neuroinflammation, is also impacted by NO production [61]. In the clinical population, high levels of NO are seen not only in MS lesions, but also in patients’ urine, cerebrospinal fluid, and blood [97,98]. Additional research has proposed that NO production is also related to demyelination in the central nervous system commonly seen in MS [99,100].

A wealth of literature is lacking on the use of cannabinoids for PD related motor symptoms, but several studies have found that high urine concentrations of 11-OH-THC, the active metabolite of THC, were associated with improved tremors, rigidity, and bradykinesia [101,102,103]. In the 6-OHDA rat model, tetrahydrocannabivarin (THCV) was demonstrated to have symptom-reducing effects by reducing motor inhibition, improving akinesia/bradykinesia, and neuroprotection of nigral dopaminergic neurons [104,105].

THCV, another compound derived from cannabis, has proven to be an interesting method of treatment for motor symptoms related to Parkinson’s, due to its antagonism of CB1R but activation of CB2R [106,107]. Parkinsonian rats that received acute injections of THCV displayed motor inhibition similar to the effect of rimonabant, a CB1R antagonist, through alterations in glutamatergic transmission in the basal ganglia [104]. Long-term administration of this compound also decreased microglia activation and helped conserve nigrostriatal dopamine neurons [108,109]. Espadas et al. found that THCV administration delayed initial dyskinesia and reduced intensity of existing dyskinesia in a mouse model of Parkinson’s disease [105].

Clinical trials for the use of cannabinoids for MS have provided mixed results. Smaller studies found that Dronabinol was more efficacious than placebo at decreasing spasticity [110,111,112,113]. However, other studies [112] found no differences between cannabinoids and placebo treatment on spasticity relief. Mixed results have been hypothesized to be in part due to inconsistencies with dosage [114], with some studies possibly not administrating a potent enough dose for cannabinoids to produce a desirable effect. Another study found no differences in spasticity relief when patients were administered placebo, Dronabinol, or whole-plant cannabis extract [112,115]. Interestingly, at the 12-month follow up, there was a significant decrease in the patients Ashworth Score, a way to measure spasticity severity and impact, in the limb given Dronabinol [115]. Another synthetic cannabinoid, Nabilone, has shown promising results at providing MS relief at low doses with patients reporting a significant decrease in pain, but no change in spasticity and/or motor functioning [22,116].

Spasticity among MS patients was greatly reduced in those who took Sativex, which is composed of 2.5% CBD and 2.7% THC by volume [117]. These promising findings have prompted researchers to further investigate the potential of cannabinoids in treating Parkinson’s and MS-related motor deficits [118]. Since 2018, the number of FDA-approved cannabinoid treatments has increased. Sativex is a cannabis-derived medication approved for use in Great Britain and Ireland for MS. Sativex, administered as an oral mucosal spray, and is a partial agonist for both cannabinoid receptors, which allows for the modulation of excitation and inhibition of various neurotransmitters, effectively providing relief to some clinical populations [119].

In a study of 241 participants, Sativex was prescribed for nerve damage-induced spasticity seen in MS; approximately 80% benefited from the medication [112]. Spasticity in MS arises from damaged nerves, partially due to inflammation, and since Sativex attenuated motor symptoms of MS, it is plausible that it may also impact motor symptoms in Parkinson’s. Current cannabinoids approved for medical use related to age-related disorders can be found in Figure 4.

Figure 4Cannabinoids licensed for prescription and evidence for potential treatment in age-related disorders. Upwards arrows indicate an increase whereas downwards arrows indicate a decrease. Created with BioRender.com.

3. Overall Symptom Relief

3.1. Neuroprotection

Cannabinoids have been found to be neuroprotective in a variety of ways. Cells lacking CB1R are more vulnerable to damage including neuronal loss and reduced neurogenesis [120], indicating that manipulation of the ECS likely plays a role in neuronal survival, and could be used to prevent Aβ deposits and apoptosis [121,122,123]. In Van der Stelts’ study [124], injection of Aβ peptide (5 mg/kg) into the cortex resulted in inhibition of endocannabinoid reuptake via VDM-11, causing a reversal of Aβ-induced neurotoxicity and memory impairment. VDM-11 administration reversed neuronal damage via reduction in caspase-3, iNOS, COX-2, and increased calbindin [124]. This effect is seemingly dependent on early administration of the reuptake inhibitor, highlighting a temporal effect of treatment. Administration of VDM-11 later in disease progression was found to worsen memory retention—further suggesting that cannabinoid therapies are beneficial in early stages of AD. It is possible that inhibiting cannabinoid reuptake may be advantageous in terms of decreasing Aβ accumulation; however, they pose the risk of worsening progressive memory deficits seen in AD.

In the central nervous system, CB2Rs are mainly present on glial cells, as well as the brainstem, and the cerebellum [120,125]. CB2Rs are upregulated in activated microglia which is theorized to mediate the production of pro-inflammatory molecules such as interlukin-1β, ROS, and prostaglandins [126]. Evidence for this comes from the upregulation of CB2 receptors within activated microglia proximal to senile plaque deposits [92].

Bilkei-Gorzo and colleagues [127] found a decline in CB1R expression and endocannabinoid levels in aged animals, suggesting that ECS modulation could mitigate age-related symptomology. In their 2011 study, they found that 3 mg/kg of THC a day delivered via osmotic pump restored cognitive functioning, memory, and neurogenesis after 4 weeks of chronic THC administration in mature (10-month old) and old mice (18-month old) but had the opposite effect in young mice. (2-month-old). Cognitive functioning was measured using the Morris Water Maze (MWM) [128] to test spatial learning and memory retention, the Novel Object Recognition Test [129] to further assess spatial memory, and Partner Recognition Tests [130,131,132] to test social memory. THC-treated mice showed 30–50% improvement on MWM performance compared to controls. In aged mice, THC also showed restored results on the Novel Object Recognition Test to be comparable to those from young mice. Aged mice treated with THC also exhibited 40% higher social recognition compared to controls. These effects appear to be dependent on the activation of CB1R specifically, as CB1R −/− mice showed no response to THC administration. At the cellular level, THC reversed age-related synaptic loss via increased synapsin I and synaptophysin levels by 20–40%, and altered gene expressions to more closely resemble young mice—downregulating pro-aging genes (Bdnf) and upregulating anti-aging genes (Casp1)—up to 2-fold [127]. Together, these findings suggest that low-dose THC may be a viable strategy for age-related cognitive decline via CB1R activation.

3.2. Behavior and Cognition

Animal behavior studies also support the mediation of nNOS by the ECS. Lisboa and colleagues [133] conducted a study using iNOS knockout mice and subjected them to a Cued Fear Conditioning test (CFC). During the paradigm, mice were exposed to a neutral tone (80 dB, 2 kHz) that was paired alongside a weak electric shock of 0.5 mA for 2 s, and their freezing behavior was recorded. Rodent freezing behavior is thought to measure levels of fear or anxiety with higher incidences of freezing being indicative of an anxiety-like state [134,135,136]. iNOS knock-out (KO) mice had increased CFC scores and demonstrated increased eNOS and nNOS activity in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), likely due to compensatory measures from the lack of iNOS [133]. Notably, the mPFC is primarily responsible for higher-order cognitive functions, such as memory consolidation, attention and decision-making, as well as social cognition and emotional processing, all of which are common deficits seen in clinical populations of age-related disorders [130,137,138,139]. These results support the idea that the ECS is critical to mediating affective behaviors through its interaction with the nitrergic redox system, though the effects of said interaction are dependent on the type of receptor activated and the context of its activation.

The cannabinoid agonist WIN-55 can decrease behaviors associated with anxiety at low doses via intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection, likely due to activation of CB1R [140,141]. This is possibly due to WIN-55 ability to reduce pro-inflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), interleukin 6 (IL-6) and interleukin 1β (IL-1β), ergo reducing the inflammatory response, and theoretically the progression of inflammation in age-related disorders like Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s [141,142,143,144].

CBD, a CB1R negative allosteric modulator (NAM) of CB1 receptors and a CB2 receptor partial agonist [145], was found to reverse cognitive deficits in object and social recognition and memory degradation due to aging, as well as modulate chronic pain and depression-like behavior commonly seen in aging individuals or those with neurodegenerative diseases like AD, PD, and MS [109,141,146,147,148]. In a separate study by Pan and colleagues [149], CBD administration via intraperitoneal injection significantly attenuated cisplatin-induced nitrosative stress, as well as inflammation and cell death within the murine kidney, highlighting CBD’s protective role in reducing inflammation associated with aging-related diseases.

MAGL, responsible for the rapid degradation and recycling of 2-AG, has been shown to be widely beneficial in the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases, like AD, PD, and MS [143,149,150,151]. Elevated 2-AG levels due to MAGL suppression were shown to attenuate neuroinflammation, preserve synaptic proteins and hippocampal LTP, reduce amyloid-β and tau pathology, prevent neuronal loss, and ultimately improve learning and memory performance in animal models [106,107,123,150]. The inhibition of FAAH has been well studied and is shown to decrease cognitive impairment seen in Alzheimer’s disease [25,122,124].

A relatively unexplored synthetic cannabinoid, nabilone—a partial agonist for both CB1R and CB2R—reduced aggression and distress while simultaneously increasing cognitive ability over a period of six weeks in patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer’s [25]. Nabilone was effective in reducing agitation and neuropsychiatric symptoms in AD, with a medium effect size (d = 0.52) [25]. However, in individuals with severe cognitive deficits, nabilone worsened cognitive symptoms compared to placebo, possibly due to the disease having irreversibly damaged the brain in those with extreme cognitive deficits. Sedation is a common unwanted side effect in those using nabilone, but not significantly different than sedation experienced with other AD medications like memantine and cholinesterase inhibitors [25]. More research is needed to understand how cannabis can safely be used for patients with differing levels of cognitive deficits.

Another endocannabinoid, AEA, has been shown to relieve psychiatric symptoms such as stress-induced anxiety, and was found to inhibit panic and anxiety behaviors like fight or flight spurred by the administration of NO via FAAH inhibition in rodent models [133]. Several ongoing clinical trials are investigating CBD for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and AD, lose-dose THC for AD, CBD as a preventative for AD, and nabilone administration for agitation in dementia and AD [152,153].

These results confirm prior studies suggesting that cannabinoid intervention can reduce inflammation and associated symptoms, improving the lives of both patients and caregivers. However, it is important to note that targeting both CB1R and CB2R may be more beneficial for controlling symptoms associated with neurodegenerative disorders, although proper dosage of both for specific conditions have not been fully parsed out yet. A summary of treatments discussed can be seen in Table 1 below.

Table 1Cannabinoid treatment summary. Upwards arrows indicate agonists of receptors, downward arrows indicate antagonists of receptors.

Cannabinoid/RNS Agonist ↑, or Antagonist ↓	Primary Receptor Targeted	Effect ECS/RNS	Therapeutic Potential	Reference
Nabilone ↑	CB1 & CB2 ↑	Unstudied	Reduced both short- and long-term aggression in AD	[141,142,143,144]
Anandamide ↑	CB1, CB2, & TRPV1 ↑	nNOS decrease contributing to cognitive effects eNOS increase resulting in vasodilation	Vasodilation by TRPV1 activation for stroke, reduction of panic behaviors induced by NO administration	[74,154]
Dronabinol ↑	CB2 ↑	Unstudied	Pain relief for MS and appetite gain in cancer, AIDS and anorexia	[155,156,157]
2-Arachidonoylglycerol ↑	CB1 & CB2	Nitrosative/Oxidative stress causes a compensatory increase in 2-AG, implying its role in combatting RNS/ROS, also shown to decrease neuroinflammation	2-AG administration to combat imbalance of free radicals caused by nitrosative or oxidative stress.	[150]
WIN ↑	CB1 & TRPV1	NOS implicated in itch, pain, and inflammation, possible regulation by ECS	Low doses produce anxiolytic effects, antipruritic effects, and pain relief	[141,142,143,144]
Cannabidiol (CBD) ↑	TRPV1 CB1	decrease in nitrosative stress, inflammation and cell death	Reverse deficits in object/social recognition, memory degradation, modulate chronic pain and depression-like behavior; common in progressive neurodegenerative diseases	[146,150,158]
AM281 ↓	CB1 ↓	Unstudied	Increase in CFC time, indicating ↑ in anxiety	[133]
MAGL	↑ 2-AG, MAGL inhibition decreases recycling of 2-AG	Been shown as widely beneficial in NOS-related disorders like AD and PD	MAGL suppression decrease neuroinflammation, and improve synaptic functioning in animal models	[106,107,150]
FAAH	↑ AEA due to inhibition of FAAH hydrolysis	Implicated in AD, NOS/Nitrosative stress-related disorder	Shown to decrease cognitive impairment due to AD	[122]
THCV	CB1 ↓ CB2 ↑	Implicated in PD, NOS/Nitrosative stress-related disorder	Improved motor symptoms due to PD, complete lack of unwanted psychological symptoms	[104]
THC	CB1 ↑ CB2 ↑	Implicated in ROS and NOS production	Low-dose THC restored scores of 18-month-old mice in Novel Object Recognition Task to 2-month-old levels. THC-treated old mice exhibited 40% higher social recognition. THC was found to downregulate BDNF (anti-aging) and upregulated Casp1 (pro-aging) up to two-fold.	[127]
VDM-11	CB1 ↓ CB2 ↓	Aβ role in ROS and NOS	Aβ induced neurotoxicity as well as memory impairment were reversed in rodents.	[124]
↑ - agonist	↓ - antagonist

4. Discussion

The effects of ECS mediation of RNS-related signaling vary substantially by the type of cannabinoid receptor activated. Cognitive and psychological symptoms can be targeted via the CB1 receptor, located abundantly in the brain. On the other hand, CB2R activation has demonstrated massive potential for the treatment of inflammation due to age-related diseases. CBD administration has been shown to improve symptoms of depression, memory degradation, and cognition—which are commonly associated with NOS-related neurodegenerative disorders [109,146,147,159,160]. Although the role of CBD in physiological symptoms such as nitrosative stress, inflammation, and cell death appears to be protective, additional studies are necessary to make further conclusions.

A critical mechanism which ECS activation may offer neuroprotection is through the direct modulation of nNOS activity and subsequent nitrosative stress. CB1R activation on presynaptic glutamatergic terminals inhibits glutamate release, in turn reducing NMDA receptor overactivation and the subsequent calcium influx, driving nNOS activity [21,22]. In a physiological environment, NMDA activation allows calcium entry, which in turn binds calmodulin and activates nNOS to produce NO at low levels appropriate for cellular signaling [39,45]. However, in neurodegenerative disorders, chronic excitotoxicity leads to sustained NMDA receptor activation, excessive calcium influx, and nNOS activation resulting in elevated NO production and the subsequent formation of ONOO- [50,52,53]. This nitrosative stress cascade contributes to protein nitration, mitochondrial dysfunction, and apoptosis [36,37]. CB1R activation may reduce nNOS overactivation indirectly via attenuating glutamatergic signaling upstream of this cascade. This is consistent with findings from Martínez-Torres and Morán [22], who demonstrated that CB1R activation provides neuroprotection via a reduction in oxidative stress in a model of glutamate excitotoxicity alongside the observation from Kim et al. that CB1R knockout mice exhibit enhanced NOS activity within the cortex [62].

While cannabinoids effects on NOS activity occurs largely through modulation of excitatory signaling, CB2R activation appears to modulate NOS through a distinct inflammation-dependent pathway. In microglia and astrocytes, pro-inflammatory signaling upregulates iNOS expression, resulting in sustained, heightened NO production that contributes to chronic nitrosative stress in neurodegenerative conditions [40,60]. CB2 agonists have been shown to suppress the inflammatory pathway and reduce iNOS expression in glial cells [63]. Additionally, AM1241, a selective CB2 agonist, attenuated microglial activation by reducing iNOS expression in rodent models [79]. Furthermore, inhibition of FAAH using PF-3845 in a TBI mouse model suppressed iNOS and COX-2 expression while simultaneously elevating AEA levels and reducing neurodegeneration [80].

Dronabinol and nabilone have been shown to improve a variety of behavioral symptoms such as anorexia, disturbed behaviors, nighttime agitation, and aggression due to neurodegeneration and age-related disorders [161,162]. However, these synthetic cannabinoids are based on the structure of THC, and can cause euphoria, paranoia, and other unwanted side effects by activation of CB1R in the brain [24].

Preclinical and clinical studies testing the effects of different cannabinoid agonists have found promising results. THCV use is not attributed to psychological effects due to its antagonism of CB1R [163] but has been found to be neuroprotective in neurodegeneration and age-related disorders [164], due to its activation of CB2 receptors. Synchronized activation of these of cannabinoid receptors within the body is possibly a more relevant area of study as medical cannabis—the most commonly prescribed form of cannabinoid treatment—is not selective with what ECS receptors it activates.

It is important to note that the effects of cannabinoid treatment are almost entirely dependent on the dose administered. In low doses, WIN-55 causes anxiolytic effects via the activation of the CB1R, whereas high doses of WIN-55 had the opposite effect, likely due to inflammation and activation of the TRPV1 receptor [165]. Interestingly, THCV may act as a CB2 agonist or antagonist depending on the dose; in high doses, THCV acts as a CB2 antagonist, whereas in low doses, THCV can act as a CB2 agonist [104]. Future studies regarding dose efficacy on a variety of cannabinoids may prove a worthy venture for researchers in treating specific symptoms/conditions. Another possible avenue of cannabinoid treatment is through the inhibition of FAAH and MAGL—the enzymes responsible for the degradation of AEA and 2-AG.

Current treatments for AD consist of cholinesterase inhibitors, NMDA receptor antagonists, and anti-amyloid therapies. Cholinesterase inhibitors such as Donepezil, Rivastigmine, and Galantamine only provide temporary cognitive improvement and are accompanied by unwanted side effects like nausea, vomiting, and bradycardia [166]. NMDA receptor agonists like Memantine have limited efficacy in later stage disease, and side effects include dizziness, confusion, and headaches. The newest anti-amyloid therapies targeting amyloid plaques show mixed efficacy, are expensive, and come with the risk of brain swelling or bleeding [167]. Although these medications are commonly prescribed, they come with serious side effects and do not stop or prevent progression of the disease. Cannabinoid treatment, on the other hand, appears to modulate early symptoms like inflammation [57], have neuroprotective properties [58], assist in general symptom relief [106], and have fewer side effects if dosed properly. Endocannabinoid treatments could also be used in conjunction with these medications to provide relief for side effects.

There are many barriers to understanding and utilizing cannabinoid-based treatments. Optimal ratios of THC:CBD, best route of administration, and longitudinal effects of treatment have yet to be investigated. This presents a need for more comprehensive studies on the interaction between the ECS and RNS to fully elucidate its mechanisms, including long-term clinical trials to assess treatment efficacy and risk factors. The promising findings of several studies demonstrate the potential of using the ECS to modulate NOS activity, particularly in the treatment of nitrosative stress-related disorders like AD and PD.

5. Conclusions

The interaction of the ECS and RNS systems plays a crucial role in the regulation of affect, pain, appetite, memory, and cognition and has vast therapeutic potential in treating diseases relating to NOS activity.

CB1R activation moderates glutamatergic excitotoxicity via inhibition of presynaptic glutamate release, thereby reducing calcium influx and subsequent nNOS activation [21,32,50]. Microglial CB2R activation suppresses iNOS expression, attenuating the sustained NO production that contributes to nitrosative stress [61,63]. The dual capacity of the ECS to modulate both excitotoxic (nNOS) and neuroinflammatory (iNOS) sources of NO make it a uniquely versatile target for intervention in nitrosative stress seen in neurodegenerative disorders.

Current therapies for AD and PD—such as cholinesterase inhibitors, NMDA agonists and L-DOPA—offer only symptomatic relief and are often accompanied by serious side effects such as nausea, dyskinesia, and cognitive impairment [168,169,170]. Cannabinoid treatments demonstrate multi-target potential in reducing nitrosative/oxidative stress, modulating neuroinflammation, and restoring synaptic function. Preclinical evidence from animal studies highlight the ability of cannabinoid treatments to mitigate Aβ plaque accumulation, microglial activation, and excitotoxicity, while also improving behavioral symptoms like agitation and motor dysfunction.

Many challenges remain in translating these findings into clinical use. Dose-dependent, temporal, receptor-type, and long-term effects of cannabinoid treatments have yet to be elucidated. Legal barriers such as contradictory legal status and a schedule I classification impedes the ability of researchers, consumers, and clinicians to fully understand the potential of cannabinoid treatment.

Despite these roadblocks, cannabinoid treatment offers a promising alternative to conventional treatments by addressing symptomology and the underlying molecular mechanisms of these diseases. Future research should prioritize dose and temporal-dependent effects, difference in the effects on cognition versus psychiatric symptoms, and long-term effects of cannabinoid treatment for age-related disorders. Cannabinoid treatment uniquely addresses AD and PD pathology via crosstalk between the RNS and ECS, which provides hope for disease modification as an alternative to/supplement to conventional treatments.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Ruhksana Sultana, Rhys Switzer, Sandy Farrar, and Rahul Sinha for their insight in the genesis of this work. Francesca Filbey and Samuel Poelker-Wells for their assistance in editing. And thanks to Harshit Bansal and Anjan Garg for their work on the bibliography.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:

ECS	endocannabinoid system
RNS	reactive nitrosative species
AD	Alzheimer’s disease
PD	Parkinson’s disease
GPCR	g protein-coupled receptor
FAAH	fatty acid amide hydrolase
AEA	anandamide
2-AG	2-arachidonoylglycerol
THC	tetrahydrocannabinol
CBD	Cannabidiol
NAPE	N-acyl-phosphatidylethanolamine
NAPE-PLD	N-acyl-phosphatidylethanolamine-hydrolyzing phospholipase D
PLC	phospholipase C
DAG	diacylglycerol
cAMP	cyclic adenosine monophosphate
PKA	Protein kinase A
CAMKII	calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II
MAPK	Mitogen activated protein kinase
CNS	central nervous system
EPM	elevated plus maze
ATP	Adenosine triphosphate
mtNOS	mitochondrial nitric oxide synthase
RNS	Reactive nitrogen species
ROS	reactive oxygen species
AO	antioxidants
MS	multiple sclerosis
RyR’s	Ryanodine receptors
ER	Endoplasmic recticulum
MERC’s	mitochondria endoplasmic reticulum contact sites
MCU	mitochondrial calcium uniporter
mPTP	mitochondrial permeability transition pore
NO	nitric oxide
NOS	nitric oxide synthase
nNOS	neuronal nitric oxide synthase
eNOS	endothelial nitric oxide synthase
iNOS	inducible nitric oxide synthase
LTP	long-term potentiation
NMDA	N-methyl-D-aspartate
cGMP	Cyclic guanosine monophosphate
L-NAME	N-omega-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester
fEPSP’s	field excitatory post-synaptic potentials
PKC	protein kinase C
PKG	protein kinase G
ONOO-	superoxide anion form peroxynitrite
MAGL	monoacylglycerol lipase
OA	osteoarthritis
THCV	tetrahydrocannabivarin
MWM	Morris Water Maze
CFC	Cued fear conditioning
KO	knock out
mPFC	medial prefrontal cortex
i.p.	Intraperitoneal
TNF-α	tumor necrosis factor alpha
IL-6	interleukin 6
IL-1β	interleukin 1-β
NAM	Negative allosteric modulator
MCI	mild cognitive impairment

Author Contributions

A.D.: writing—original draft, co-investigation and resources with I.Y.C.; I.Y.C.: writing—review and editing of manuscript and figures, co-investigation and resources with A.D.; M.D.B.: writing—review and editing, project administration, funding acquisition, and overall supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Funding Statement

This research was supported by the NIH/NIDDK grants: R35GM147094 (MDB), R21DK130015 (MDB), the University of Texas System STARS program research support grant (MDB), and the Rita Allen Foundation Grant (MDB).

Footnotes

Footnote Group

References

Untitled section

References

1.Lu H.-C., Mackie K. An Introduction to the Endogenous Cannabinoid System. Biol. Psychiatry. 2016;79:516–525. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.07.028.
2.Lawley S., Green A., Johnson C., Burton M.D. Interspecies differences in the expression of cannabinoid receptors at the tissue and cellular levels. Neural Regen. Res. 2025 doi: 10.4103/NRR.NRR-D-25-00806.
3.Skaper S.D., Marzo V.D. Endocannabinoids in nervous system health and disease: The big picture in a nutshell. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2012;367:3193–3200. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0313.
4.Wilt S., Kodani S., Valencia L., Hudson P.K., Sanchez S., Quintana T., Morisseau C., Hammock B.D., Kandasamy R., Pecic S. Further Exploration of the Structure-Activity Relationship of Dual Soluble Epoxide Hydrolase/Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase Inhibitors. Bioorganic Med. Chem. 2021;51:116507. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2021.116507.
5.Almeida D.L.d., Devi L.A. Diversity of molecular targets and signaling pathways for CBD. Pharmacol. Res. Perspect. 2020;8:e00682. doi: 10.1002/prp2.682.
6.Leo L.M., Abood M.E. CB1 Cannabinoid Receptor Signaling and Biased Signaling. Molecules. 2021;26:5413. doi: 10.3390/molecules26175413.
7.Zou S., Kumar U. Cannabinoid Receptors and the Endocannabinoid System: Signaling and Function in the Central Nervous System. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19:833. doi: 10.3390/ijms19030833.
8.Moreno-Rodríguez M., Tena I.B.d., Martínez-Gardeazabal J., Pereira-Castelo G., Llorente-Ovejero A., Manuel I., Rodríguez-Puertas R. Cannabinoid agonist WIN55,212-2 prevents scopolamine-induced impairment of spatial memory in rats. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2025;998:177612. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2025.177612.
9.Okamoto Y., Morishita J., Tsuboi K., Tonai T., Ueda N. Molecular Characterization of a Phospholipase D Generating Anandamide and Its Congeners *. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:5298–5305. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M306642200.
10.Mock E.D., Gagestein B., Stelt M.v.d. Anandamide and other N-acylethanolamines: A class of signaling lipids with therapeutic opportunities. Prog. Lipid Res. 2023;89:101194. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2022.101194.
11.Murataeva N., Straiker A., Mackie K. Parsing the players: 2-arachidonoylglycerol synthesis and degradation in the CNS. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2014;171:1379–1391. doi: 10.1111/bph.12411.
12.Ueda N., Tsuboi K., Uyama T., Ohnishi T. Biosynthesis and degradation of the endocannabinoid 2-arachidonoylglycerol. BioFactors. 2011;37:1–7. doi: 10.1002/biof.131.
13.Ohno-Shosaku T., Maejima T., Kano M. Endogenous Cannabinoids Mediate Retrograde Signals from Depolarized Postsynaptic Neurons to Presynaptic Terminals. Neuron. 2001;29:729–738. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00247-1.
14.Milligan A.L., Szabo-Pardi T.A., Burton M.D. Cannabinoid Receptor type 1 and its role as an analgesic: An opioid alternative? J. Dual Diagn. 2019;16:106–119. doi: 10.1080/15504263.2019.1668100.
15.Ling X., Wang W. A-80426 suppresses CFA-induced inflammatory pain by suppressing TRPV1 activity via NFκB and PI3K pathways in mice. Clinics. 2023;78:100213. doi: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2023.100213.
16.Kargbo R.B. TRPV1 Modulators for the Treatment of Pain and Inflammation. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2019;10:143–144. doi: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.8b00618.
17.Lipina C., Hundal H.S. Modulation of cellular redox homeostasis by the endocannabinoid system. Open Biol. 2016;6:150276. doi: 10.1098/rsob.150276.
18.Shan R., Zhang Y., Shi Y., Wang X., Wang X., Ma G., Li Q. Activation of Cannabinoid Type 2 Receptor in Microglia Reduces Neuroinflammation through Inhibiting Aerobic Glycolysis to Relieve Hypertension. Biomolecules. 2024;14:333. doi: 10.3390/biom14030333.
19.Jordt S., Ehrlich B. Trp Channels in Disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Mol. Basis Dis. 2007;1772:805–812. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6191-2_9.
20.Huang Y.-Z., Ma J.-X., Bian Y.-J., Bai Q.-R., Gao Y.-H., Di S.-K., Lei Y.-T., Yang H., Yang X.-N., Shao C.-Y., et al. TRPV1 analgesics disturb core body temperature via a biased allosteric mechanism involving conformations distinct from that for nociception. Neuron. 2024;112:1815–1831.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2024.02.016.
21.Szallasi A., Blumberg P.M. Vanilloid (Capsaicin) Receptors and Mechanisms. Pharmacol. Rev. 1999;51:159–211. doi: 10.1016/S0031-6997(24)01403-0.
22.Marsicano G., Goodenough S., Monory K., Hermann H., Eder M., Cannich A., Azad S.C., Cascio M.G., Gutiérrez S.O., Stelt M.v.d., et al. CB1 Cannabinoid Receptors and On-Demand Defense Against Excitotoxicity. Science. 2003;302:84–88. doi: 10.1126/science.1088208.
23.Martínez-Torres A.M., Morán J. CB1 Receptor Activation Provides Neuroprotection in an Animal Model of Glutamate-Induced Excitotoxicity Through a Reduction of NOX-2 Activity and Oxidative Stress. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 2024;30:e70099. doi: 10.1111/cns.70099.
24.Liu C.S., Chau S.A., Ruthirakuhan M., Lanctôt K.L., Herrmann N., Liu C.S., Chau S.A., Ruthirakuhan M., Lanctôt K.L., Herrmann N. Cannabinoids for the Treatment of Agitation and Aggression in Alzheimer’s Disease. CNS Drugs. 2015;29:615–623. doi: 10.1007/s40263-015-0270-y.
25.Herrmann N., Ruthirakuhan M., Gallagher D., Verhoeff N.P.L.G., Kiss A., Black S.E., Lanctôt K.L. Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Nabilone for Agitation in Alzheimer’s Disease. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry. 2019;27:1161–1173. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2019.05.002.
26.Marsicano G., Kuner R. Cannabinoids and the Brain. Springer; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: 2008. Anatomical Distribution of Receptors, Ligands and Enzymes in the Brain.
27.Kumar K.K., Robertson M.J., Thadhani E., Wang H., Suomivuori C.-M., Powers A.S., Ji L., Nikas S.P., Dror R.O., Inoue A., et al. Structural basis for activation of CB1 by an endocannabinoid analog. Nat. Commun. 2023;14:2672. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37864-4.
28.Rey A.A., Purrio M., Viveros M.-P., Lutz B., Rey A.A., Purrio M., Viveros M.-P., Lutz B. Biphasic Effects of Cannabinoids in Anxiety Responses: CB1 and GABAB Receptors in the Balance of GABAergic and Glutamatergic Neurotransmission. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012;37:2624–2634. doi: 10.1038/npp.2012.123.
29.Bie B., Wu J., Foss J.F., Naguib M. An overview of the cannabinoid type 2 (CB2) receptor system and its therapeutic potential. Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol. 2018;31:407–414. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000616.
30.Moe A., Rayasam A., Sauber G., Shah R.K., Doherty A., Yuan C.-Y., Szabo A., Bob M Moore I., Colonna M., Cui W., et al. Type 2 cannabinoid receptor expression on microglial cells regulates neuroinflammation during graft-versus-host disease. J. Clin. Investig. 2024;134:e175205. doi: 10.1172/JCI175205.
31.Kurade M., Bobba-Alves N., Kelly C., Behnke A., Conklin Q., Juster R.-P., Hirano M., Trumpff C., Picard M., Kurade M., et al. Mitochondrial and psychosocial stress-related regulation of FGF21 in humans. Nat. Metab. 2025;7:2212–2220. doi: 10.1038/s42255-025-01388-6.
32.Vincent A.E., Ng Y.S., White K., Davey T., Mannella C., Falkous G., Feeney C., Schaefer A.M., McFarland R., Gorman G.S., et al. The Spectrum of Mitochondrial Ultrastructural Defects in Mitochondrial Myopathy. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:30610. doi: 10.1038/srep30610.
33.Vincent A.E., White K., Davey T., Philips J., Ogden R.T., Lawless C., Warren C., Hall M.G., Ng Y.S., Falkous G., et al. Quantitative 3D Mapping of the Human Skeletal Muscle Mitochondrial Network. Cell Rep. 2019;26:996–1009.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.01.010. Erratum in Cell Rep. 2019, 27, 321.
34.Mosharov E.V., Rosenberg A.M., Monzel A.S., Osto C.A., Stiles L., Rosoklija G.B., Dwork A.J., Bindra S., Junker A., Zhang Y., et al. A human brain map of mitochondrial respiratory capacity and diversity. Nature. 2025;641:749–758. doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-08740-6. Erratum in Nature 2025, 642, E12.
35.Jenkins B.C., Neikirk K., Katti P., Claypool S.M., Kirabo A., McReynolds M.R., Hinton A., Jr. Mitochondria in disease: Changes in shapes and dynamics. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2024;49:346–360. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2024.01.011.
36.Vue Z., Garza-Lopez E., Neikirk K., Katti P., Vang L., Beasley H., Shao J., Marshall A.G., Crabtree A., Murphy A.C., et al. 3D reconstruction of murine mitochondria reveals changes in structure during aging linked to the MICOS complex. Aging Cell. 2023;22:e14009. doi: 10.1111/acel.14009.
37.Faitg J., Lacefield C., Davey T., White K., Laws R., Kosmidis S., Reeve A.K., Kandel E.R., Vincent A.E., Picard M. 3D neuronal mitochondrial morphology in axons, dendrites, and somata of the aging mouse hippocampus. Cell Rep. 2021;36:109509. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109509.
38.Martínez M.C., Andriantsitohaina R. Reactive nitrogen species: Molecular mechanisms and potential significance in health and disease. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2009;11:669–702. doi: 10.1089/ars.2007.1993.
39.Chandimali N., Bak S.G., Park E.H., Lim H.-J., Won Y.-S., Kim E.-K., Park S.-I., Lee S.J. Free radicals and their impact on health and antioxidant defenses: A review. Cell Death Discov. 2025;11:19. doi: 10.1038/s41420-024-02278-8.
40.Bon C.L.M., Garthwaite J. On the Role of Nitric Oxide in Hippocampal Long-Term Potentiation. J. Neurosci. 2003;23:1941–1948. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-05-01941.2003.
41.Wang H.-Y., Takagi H., Stoney P.N., Echeverria A., Kuhn B., Hsu K.-S., Takahashi T. Anoxia-induced hippocampal LTP is regeneratively produced by glutamate and nitric oxide from the neuro-glial-endothelial axis. iScience. 2024;27:109515. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109515.
42.Brüne B., Lapetina E.G. Phosphorylation of nitric oxide synthase by protein kinase A. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1991;181:921–926. doi: 10.1016/0006-291X(91)91279-L.
43.Balez R., Stevens C.H., Lenk K., Maksour S., Sidhu K., Sutherland G., Ooi L. Increased Neuronal Nitric Oxide Synthase in Alzheimer’s Disease Mediates Spontaneous Calcium Signaling and Divergent Glutamatergic Calcium Responses. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2024;41:255–277. doi: 10.1089/ars.2023.0395.
44.Dash U.C., Bhol N.K., Swain S.K., Samal R.R., Nayak P.K., Raina V., Panda S.K., Kerry R.G., Duttaroy A.K., Jena A.B. Oxidative stress and inflammation in the pathogenesis of neurological disorders: Mechanisms and implications. Acta Pharm. Sinica. B. 2024;15:15–34. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2024.10.004.
45.Vassileff N., Spiers J.G., Bamford S.E., Lowe R.G.T., Datta K.K., Pigram P.J., Hill A.F. Microglial activation induces nitric oxide signalling and alters protein S-nitrosylation patterns in extracellular vesicles. J. Extracell. Vesicles. 2024;13:e12455. doi: 10.1002/jev2.12455.
46.Gruber S. Cannabidiol Solution for the Treatment of Behavioral Symptoms in Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment or Alzheimers Dementia (AD) National Library of Medicine; Bethesda, MD, USA: 2025.
47.Osellame L.D., Blacker T.S., Duchen M.R. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of mitochondrial function. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2012;26:711–723. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2012.05.003.
48.Zhao R.-Z., Jiang S., Zhang L., Yu Z.-B. Mitochondrial electron transport chain, ROS generation and uncoupling (Review) Int. J. Mol. Med. 2019;44:3–15. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2019.4188.
49.Bertero E., Maack C. Calcium Signaling and Reactive Oxygen Species in Mitochondria. Circ. Res. 2018;122:1460–1478. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.310082.
50.Joseph S.K., Booth D.M., Young M.P., Hajnóczky G. Redox regulation of ER and mitochondrial Ca2+ signaling in cell survival and death. Cell Calcium. 2019;79:89–97. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2019.02.006.
51.Mattila J.T., Thomas A.C. Nitric oxide synthase: Non-canonical expression patterns. Front. Immunol. 2014;5:478. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00478.
52.Saha R.N., Pahan K. Regulation of Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase Gene in Glial Cells. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2006;8:929–947. doi: 10.1089/ars.2006.8.929.
53.Rodríguez J., Guano A.D., Mazzitelli I., Dennis V.A., Rodríguez A.M., Giambartolomei G.H. Frontiers | Type I interferons regulate nitric oxide production in Brucella abortus-activated microglia contributing to neuronal death. Front. Immunol. 2025;16:1661395. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1661395.
54.Iga Y., Yoshioka M., Togashi H., Saito H. Inhibitory action of Nω-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester on in vivo long-term potentiation in the rat dentate gyrus. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1993;238:395–398. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(93)90873-G.
55.Hopper R.A., Garthwaite J. Tonic and Phasic Nitric Oxide Signals in Hippocampal Long-Term Potentiation. J. Neurosci. 2006;26:11513–11521. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2259-06.2006.
56.Nakane M., Mitchell J., Förstermann U., Murad F. Phosphorylation by calcium calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II and protein kinase C modulates the activity of nitric oxide synthase. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1991;180:1396–1402. doi: 10.1016/S0006-291X(05)81351-8.
57.Song T., Hatano N., Horii M., Tokumitsu H., Yamaguchi F., Tokuda M., Watanabe Y. Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase I inhibits neuronal nitric-oxide synthase activity through serine 741 phosphorylation. FEBS Lett. 2004;570:133–137. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.05.083.
58.Corbin J.D., Francis S.H. Cyclic GMP Phosphodiesterase-5: Target of Sildenafil *. J. Biol. Chem. 1999;274:13729–13732. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.20.13729.
59.Płoska A., Siekierzycka A., Cieślik P., Dobrucki L.W., Kalinowski L., Wierońska J.M. The Impact of LY487379 or CDPPB on eNOS Expression in the Mouse Brain and the Effect of Joint Administration of Compounds with NO• Releasers on MK-801- or Scopolamine-Driven Cognitive Dysfunction in Mice. Molecules. 2024;29:627. doi: 10.3390/molecules29030627.
60.Jones J.D., Carney S.T., Vrana K.E., Norford D.C., Howlett A.C. Cannabinoid receptor-mediated translocation of NO-sensitive guanylyl cyclase and production of cyclic GMP in neuronal cells. Neuropharmacology. 2007;54:23–30. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2007.06.027.
61.Carney S.T., Lloyd M.L., MacKinnon S.E., Newton D.C., Jones J.D., Howlett A.C., Norford D.C. Cannabinoid Regulation of Nitric Oxide Synthase I (nNOS) in Neuronal Cells. J. Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2009;4:338–349. doi: 10.1007/s11481-009-9153-7.
62.Guo J., Ikeda S.R. Endocannabinoids modulate N-type calcium channels and G-protein-coupled inwardly rectifying potassium channels via CB1 cannabinoid receptors heterologously expressed in mammalian neurons. Mol. Pharmacol. 2004;65:665–674. doi: 10.1124/mol.65.3.665.
63.Harding E.K., Souza I.A., Gandini M.A., Gadotti V.M., Ali M.Y., Huang S., Antunes F.T.T., Trang T., Zamponi G.W. BPS Publications. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2023;180:1616–1633. doi: 10.1111/bph.16035.
64.Quijano C., Alvarez B., Gatti R.M., Augusto O., Radi R. Pathways of peroxynitrite oxidation of thiol groups. Biochem. J. 1997;322:167–173. doi: 10.1042/bj3220167.
65.Radi R., Cosgrove T.P., Beckman J.S., Freeman B.A. Peroxynitrite-induced luminol chemiluminescence. Biochem. J. 1993;290:51–57. doi: 10.1042/bj2900051.
66.Soetkamp D., Nguyen T.T., Menazza S., Hirschhäuser C., Hendgen-Cotta U.B., Rassaf T., Schlüter K.D., Boengler K., Murphy E., Schulz R. S-nitrosation of mitochondrial connexin 43 regulates mitochondrial function. Basic Res. Cardiol. 2014;109:433. doi: 10.1007/s00395-014-0433-x.
67.Campanella C., D’Anneo A., Gammazza A.M., Bavisotto C.C., Barone R., Emanuele S., Cascio F.L., Mocciaro E., Fais S., Macario E.C.D., et al. The histone deacetylase inhibitor SAHA induces HSP60 nitration and its extracellular release by exosomal vesicles in human lung-derived carcinoma cells. Oncotarget. 2015;7:28849–28867. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.6680.
68.Franco M.C., Ricart K.C., Gonzalez A.S., Dennys C.N., Nelson P.A., Janes M.S., Mehl R.A., Landar A., Estévez A.G. Nitration of Hsp90 on Tyrosine 33 Regulates Mitochondrial Metabolism. J. Biol. Chem. 2015;290:19055–19066. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.663278.
69.Bavisotto C.C., Alberti G., Vitale A.M., Paladino L., Campanella C., Rappa F., Gorska M., Macario E.C.d., Cappello F., Macario A.J.L., et al. Hsp60 Post-translational Modifications: Functional and Pathological Consequences. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2020;7:95. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2020.00095.
70.Chatterjee T., Taboada A., Logan I.E., Paul P.N., Huerta M., Reardon P., Radi R., Zeida A., Franco M.C. Nitration-driven structural changes in Hsp90 linked to gain of pathological functions. Biochem. J. 2025;482:1209–1228. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20253230.
71.Zou S., Kumar U. Colocalization of cannabinoid receptor 1 with somatostatin and neuronal nitric oxide synthase in rat brain hippocampus. Brain Res. 2015;1622:114–126. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.06.021.
72.Lipina C., Hundal H.S. The endocannabinoid system: ‘NO’ longer anonymous in the control of nitrergic signalling? J. Mol. Cell Biol. 2017;9:91–103. doi: 10.1093/jmcb/mjx008.
73.dos-Santos-Pereira M., Guimarães F.S., Del-Bel E., Raisman-Vozari R., Michel P.P. Cannabidiol prevents LPS-induced microglial inflammation by inhibiting ROS/NF-κB-dependent signaling and glucose consumption. Glia. 2020;68:561–573. doi: 10.1002/glia.23738.
74.Kim S.H., Won S.J., Mao X.O., Jin K., Greenberg D.A. Involvement of Protein Kinase A in Cannabinoid Receptor-Mediated Protection from Oxidative Neuronal Injury. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2005;313:88–94. doi: 10.1124/jpet.104.079509.
75.Molina-Holgado F., Molina-Holgado E., Guaza C., Rothwell N.J. Role of CB1 and CB2 receptors in the inhibitory effects of cannabinoids on lipopolysaccharide-induced nitric oxide release in astrocyte cultures. J. Neurosci. Res. 2002;67:829–836. doi: 10.1002/jnr.10165.
76.Komeima K., Rogers B.S., Lu L., Campochiaro P.A. Antioxidants reduce cone cell death in a model of retinitis pigmentosa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:11300–11305. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0604056103.
77.Piano I., Corsi F., Polini B., Gargini C. Frontiers | Nutraceutical Molecules Slow Down Retinal Degeneration, in Tvrm4 Mice a Model of Retinitis Pigmentosa, by Genetic Modulation of Anti-oxidant Pathway. Front. Neurosci. 2022;16:868750. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.868750.
78.Kasatkina L.A., Rittchen S., Sturm E.M. Neuroprotective and Immunomodulatory Action of the Endocannabinoid System under Neuroinflammation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:5431. doi: 10.3390/ijms22115431.
79.Ma L., Jia J., Liu X., Bai F., Wang Q., Xiong L. Activation of murine microglial N9 cells is attenuated through cannabinoid receptor CB2 signaling. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2015;458:92–97. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.01.073.
80.Tchantchou F., Tucker L.B., Fu A.H., Bluett R.J., McCabe J.T., Patel S., Zhang Y. The fatty acid amide hydrolase inhibitor PF-3845 promotes neuronal survival, attenuates inflammation and improves functional recovery in mice with traumatic brain injury. Neuropharmacology. 2014;85:427–439. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2014.06.006.
81.Esposito G., Filippis D.D., Steardo L., Scuderi C., Savani C., Cuomo V., Iuvone T. CB1 receptor selective activation inhibits β-amyloid-induced iNOS protein expression in C6 cells and subsequently blunts tau protein hyperphosphorylation in co-cultured neurons. Neurosci. Lett. 2006;404:342–346. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.06.012.
82.Aguirre-Rueda D., Guerra-Ojeda S., Aldasoro M., Iradi A., Obrador E., Mauricio M.D., Vila J.M., Marchio P., Valles S.L. WIN 55,212-2, Agonist of Cannabinoid Receptors, Prevents Amyloid β1-42 Effects on Astrocytes in Primary Culture. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0122843. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122843.
83.Mei H.-R., Mason B., Hu Y.-Y., Saravanan A., Kulkarni S., Lam M., Nematgorgani S., Lesnak J.B., Burton M., Dussor G. Macrophages and iNOS contribute to the effects of dural prolactin and repeated stress in mouse migraine models. J. Headache Pain. 2025;27:26. doi: 10.1186/s10194-025-02261-3.
84.Gu C., Chen M., Li X., Geng D., Wang C. MAGL regulates synovial macrophage polarization vis inhibition of mitophagy in osteoarthritic pain. Mol. Med. Rep. 2023;27:117. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2023.13004.
85.Aso E., Andrés-Benito P., Ferrer I. Genetic deletion of CB1 cannabinoid receptors exacerbates the Alzheimer-like symptoms in a transgenic animal model. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2018;157:210–216. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2018.08.007.
86.Ye M., Kim J.S., Shim I. CB1 receptor activation and inhibition differentially modulate cognitive deficits and neuropathology in 3xTg-AD mice. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2025;193:118818. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2025.118818.
87.Fan X., Wang H., Ping J., Li M., Gu J., Qian W. Synaptic scaffold protein PSD-95: A therapeutic target for Alzheimer’s disease. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2025;242:117401. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2025.117401.
88.Hopperton K.E., Mohammad D., Trépanier M.O., Giuliano V., Bazinet R.P. Markers of microglia in post-mortem brain samples from patients with Alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review. Mol. Psychiatry. 2017;23:177–198. doi: 10.1038/mp.2017.246.
89.Kecheliev V., Spinelli F., Herde A., Haider A., Mu L., Klohs J., Ametamey S.M., Ni R. Evaluation of cannabinoid type 2 receptor expression and pyridine-based radiotracers in brains from a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2022;14:1018610. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.1018610.
90.Ramírez B.G., Blázquez C., Pulgar T.G.d., Guzmán M., Ceballos M.L.d. Prevention of Alzheimer’s Disease Pathology by Cannabinoids: Neuroprotection Mediated by Blockade of Microglial Activation. J. Neurosci. 2005;25:1904–1913. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4540-04.2005.
91.Terradillos I., Río I.B.-D., Puente N., Serrano M., Mimenza A., Lekunberri L., Anaut-Lusar I., Reguero L., Gerrikagoitia I., Esteban S.R.d.M., et al. Altered glial expression of the cannabinoid 1 receptor in the subiculum of a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Glia. 2023;71:866–879. doi: 10.1002/glia.24312.
92.Benito C., Núñez E., Tolón R.M., Carrier E.J., Rábano A., Hillard C.J., Romero J. Cannabinoid CB2 Receptors and Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase Are Selectively Overexpressed in Neuritic Plaque-Associated Glia in Alzheimer’s Disease Brains. J. Neurosci. 2003;23:11136–11141. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-35-11136.2003.
93.Oddi S., Scipioni L., Totaro A., Giacovazzo G., Ciaramellano F., Tortolani D., Leuti A., Businaro R., Armeli F., Bilkei-Gorzo A., et al. Fatty-acid amide hydrolase inhibition mitigates Alzheimer’s disease progression in mouse models of amyloidosis. Febs J. 2025;292:4160–4182. doi: 10.1111/febs.17403.
94.Tewari D., Sah A.N., Bawari S., Nabavi S.F., Dehpour A.R., Shirooie S., Braidy N., Fiebich B.L., Vacca R.A., Nabavi S.M. Role of Nitric Oxide in Neurodegeneration: Function, Regulation, and Inhibition. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2021;19:114–126. doi: 10.2174/18756190MTA2pMjApy.
95.Zhang L., Dawson V.L., Dawson T.M. Role of nitric oxide in Parkinson’s disease. Pharmacol. Ther. 2006;109:33–41. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2005.05.007.
96.Strekalova T., Burova A., Gorlova A., Chaprov K., Khizeva A., Coelho J.E., Svirin E., Novikova P., Ohanyan L., Munter J.J.M.P.d., et al. Bolus MPTP Injection in Aged Mice to Mimic Parkinson Disease: Effects of Low-Dose Antioxidant Treatment with Fullerene (C60) and Fullerenol (C60(OH)24) Biomedicines. 2025;13:2425. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13102425.
97.Smith K.J., Lassmann H. The role of nitric oxide in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol. 2002;1:232–241. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(02)00102-3.
98.Silva B.d., Viero F.T., Rodrigues P., Trevisan G. Nitric oxide involvement in the disability and active disease of multiple sclerosis: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Nitric Oxide. 2024;145:8–20. doi: 10.1016/j.niox.2024.01.006.
99.Liñares D., Taconis M., Maña P., Correcha M., Fordham S., Staykova M., Willenborg D.O. Neuronal Nitric Oxide Synthase Plays a Key Role in CNS Demyelination. J. Neurosci. 2006;26:12672–12681. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0294-06.2006.
100.Silva B.d., Viero F.T., Antoniazzi C.T.d.D., Kudsi S.Q., Peres D.S., Morais R.I.F., Pereira L.G., Trevisan G. 7-Nitroindazole, an nNOS inhibitor, reduces migraine-like nociception, demyelination, and anxiety-like behavior in a mouse model of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Nitric Oxide. 2025;159:51–62. doi: 10.1016/j.niox.2025.09.003.
101.Babayeva M., Assefa H., Basu P., Chumki S., Loewy Z. Marijuana Compounds: A Nonconventional Approach to Parkinson’s Disease Therapy. Park. Dis. 2016;2016:1279042. doi: 10.1155/2016/1279042.
102.Balash Y., Bar-Lev Schleider L., Korczyn A.D., Shabtai H., Knaani J., Rosenberg A., Baruch Y., Djaldetti R., Giladi N., Gurevich T. Medical Cannabis in Parkinson Disease: Real-Life Patients’ Experience. Clin. Neuropharmacol. 2017;40:268–272. doi: 10.1097/WNF.0000000000000246.
103.Lotan I., Treves T.A., Roditi Y., Djaldetti R. Cannabis (Medical Marijuana) Treatment for Motor and Non–Motor Symptoms of Parkinson Disease: An Open-Label Observational Study. Clin. Neuropharmacol. 2014;37:41–44. doi: 10.1097/WNF.0000000000000016.
104.García C., Palomo-Garo C., García-Arencibia M., Ramos J., Pertwee R., Fernández-Ruiz J. Symptom-relieving and neuroprotective effects of the phytocannabinoid Δ9-THCV in animal models of Parkinson’s disease. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2011;163:1495–1506. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01278.x.
105.Espadas I., Keifman E., Palomo-Garo C., Burgaz S., García C., Fernández-Ruiz J., Moratalla R. Beneficial effects of the phytocannabinoid Δ9-THCV in L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia in Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol. Dis. 2020;141:104892. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2020.104892.
106.Mounsey R.B., Mustafa S., Robinson L., Ross R.A., Riedel G., Pertwee R.G., Teismann P. Increasing levels of the endocannabinoid 2-AG is neuroprotective in the 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine mouse model of Parkinson’s disease. Exp. Neurol. 2015;273:36–44. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2015.07.024.
107.Chen C. Inhibiting degradation of 2-arachidonoylglycerol as a therapeutic strategy for neurodegenerative diseases. Pharmacol. Ther. 2023;244:108394. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2023.108394.
108.Stone N.L., Murphy A.J., England T.J., O’Sullivan S.E. A systematic review of minor phytocannabinoids with promising neuroprotective potential. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2020;177:4330–4352. doi: 10.1111/bph.15185.
109.Giuliano C., Francavilla M., Ongari G., Petese A., Ghezzi C., Rossini N., Blandini F., Cerri S. Neuroprotective and Symptomatic Effects of Cannabidiol in an Animal Model of Parkinson’s Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:8920. doi: 10.3390/ijms22168920.
110.Petro D.J., Ellenberger C. ACCP Journals. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 1981;21:413S–416S. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1981.tb02621.x.
111.Ungerleider J.T., Andyrsiak T., Fairbanks L., Ellison G.W., Myers L.W. Delta-9-THC in the treatment of spasticity associated with multiple sclerosis. Adv. Alcohol Subst. Abus. 1987;7:39–50. doi: 10.1300/J251v07n01_04.
112.Etges T., Karolia K., Grint T., Taylor A., Lauder H., Daka B., Wright S. An observational postmarketing safety registry of patients in the UK, Germany, and Switzerland who have been prescribed Sativex® (THC:CBD, nabiximols) oromucosal spray. Ther. Clin. Risk Manag. 2016;12:1667–1675. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S115014.
113.Zajicek J., Sanders H., Wright D., Vickery P., Ingram W., Reilly S., Nunn A., Teare L., Fox P., Thompson A. Cannabinoids in multiple sclerosis (CAMS) study: Safety and efficacy data for 12 months follow up. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2005;76:1664–1669. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2005.070136.
114.Haddad F., Dokmak G., Karaman R. The Efficacy of Cannabis on Multiple Sclerosis-Related Symptoms. Life. 2022;12:682. doi: 10.3390/life12050682.
115.Zajicek J., Fox P., Sanders H., Wright D., Vickery J., Nunn A., Thompson A. Cannabinoids for treatment of spasticity and other symptoms related to multiple sclerosis (CAMS study): Multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2003;362:1517–1526. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14738-1.
116.Wissel J., Haydn T., Müller J., Brenneis C., Berger T., Poewe W., Schelosky L.D., Wissel J., Haydn T., Müller J., et al. Low dose treatment with the synthetic cannabinoid Nabilone significantly reduces spasticity-related pain. J. Neurol. 2006;253:1337–1341. doi: 10.1007/s00415-006-0218-8.
117.Russo M., Dattola V., Logiudice A.L., Ciurleo R., Sessa E., Luca R.D., Bramanti P., Bramanti A., Naro A., Calabrò R.S. The role of Sativex in robotic rehabilitation in individuals with multiple sclerosis: Rationale, study design, and methodology. Medicine. 2017;96:e8826. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008826.
118.The American Parkinson Disease Association (APDA) Medical Marijuana and Parkinson’s Disease. [(accessed on 27 August 2024)]. Available online: https://www.apdaparkinson.org/living-with-parkinsons-disease/treatment-medication/medical-marijuana-and-parkinsons-disease/
119.Russo M., Calabrò R.S., Naro A., Sessa E., Rifici C., D’Aleo G., Leo A., Luca R.D., Quartarone A., Bramanti P. Sativex in the Management of Multiple Sclerosis-Related Spasticity: Role of the Corticospinal Modulation. Neural Plast. 2015;2015:656582. doi: 10.1155/2015/656582.
120.Gargano A., Beins E., Zimmer A., Bilkei-Gorzo A. Lack of Cannabinoid Receptor Type-1 Leads to Enhanced Age-Related Neuronal Loss in the Locus Coeruleus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;22:5. doi: 10.3390/ijms22010005.
121.Stella N., Schweitzer P., Piomelli D. A second endogenous cannabinoid that modulates long-term potentiation. Nature. 1997;388:773–778. doi: 10.1038/42015.
122.Bajaj S., Jain S., Vyas P., Bawa S., Vohora D. The role of endocannabinoid pathway in the neuropathology of Alzheimer’s disease: Can the inhibitors of MAGL and FAAH prove to be potential therapeutic targets against the cognitive impairment associated with Alzheimer’s disease? Brain Res. Bull. 2021;174:305–322. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2021.06.022.
123.Hashem J., Hu M., Zhang J., Gao F., Chen C. Inhibition of 2-arachidonoylglycerol metabolism alleviates neuropathology and improves cognitive function in a tau mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Neurobiol. 2021;58:4122–4133. doi: 10.1007/s12035-021-02400-2.
124.Stelt M.v.d., Mazzola C., Esposito G., Matias I., Petrosino S., Filippis D.D., Micale V., Steardo L., Drago F., Iuvone T., et al. Endocannabinoids and β-amyloid-induced neurotoxicity in vivo: Effect of pharmacological elevation of endocannabinoid levels. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. CMLS. 2006;63:1410–1424. doi: 10.1007/s00018-006-6037-3.
125.Cluny N.L., Keenan C.M., Duncan M., Fox A., Lutz B., Sharkey K.A. Naphthalen-1-yl-(4-pentyloxynaphthalen-1-yl)methanone (SAB378), a peripherally restricted cannabinoid CB1/CB2 receptor agonist, inhibits gastrointestinal motility but has no effect on experimental colitis in mice. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2010;334:973–980. doi: 10.1124/jpet.110.169946.
126.Di Marzo V., Melck D., Bisogno T., De Petrocellis L. Endocannabinoids: Endogenous cannabinoid receptor ligands with neuromodulatory action. Trends Neurosci. 1998;21:521–528. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(98)01283-1. Erratum in Trends Neurosci. 1999, 22, 80.
127.Bilkei-Gorzo A., Albayram O., Draffehn A., Michel K., Piyanova A., Oppenheimer H., Dvir-Ginzberg M., Rácz I., Ulas T., Imbeault S., et al. A chronic low dose of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) restores cognitive function in old mice. Nat. Med. 2017;23:782–787. doi: 10.1038/nm.4311.
128.Vorhees C.V., Williams M.T., Vorhees C.V., Williams M.T. Morris water maze: Procedures for assessing spatial and related forms of learning and memory. Nat. Protoc. 2006;1:848–858. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.116.
129.Lueptow L.M. Novel Object Recognition Test for the Investigation of Learning and Memory in Mice. J. Vis. Exp. JoVE. 2017;2017:e55718. doi: 10.3791/55718.
130.Cum M., Pérez J.A.S., Wangia E., Lopez N., Wright E.S., Iwata R.L., Li A., Chambers A.R., Padilla-Coreano N. A systematic review and meta-analysis of how social memory is studied. Sci. Rep. 2024;14:2221. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52277-z.
131.Arakawa H., Arakawa K., Blanchard D.C., Blanchard R.J. A new test paradigm for social recognition evidenced by urinary scent marking behavior in C57BL/6J mice. Behav. Brain Res. 2008;190:97–104. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.02.009.
132.A V., G C., L R. A social recognition test for female mice reveals behavioral effects of developmental chlorpyrifos exposure. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 2006;28:466–471. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2006.05.003.
133.Lisboa S.F., Gomes F.V., Silva A.L., Uliana D.L., Camargo L.H.A., Guimarães F.S., Cunha F.Q., Joca S.R.L., Resstel L.B.M. Increased Contextual Fear Conditioning in iNOS Knockout Mice: Additional Evidence for the Involvement of Nitric Oxide in Stress-Related Disorders and Contribution of the Endocannabinoid System. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015;18:pyv005. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyv005.
134.Roelofs K. Freeze for action: Neurobiological mechanisms in animal and human freezing. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2017;372:20160206. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0206.
135.Gozzi A., Jain A., Giovanelli A., Bertollini C., Crestan V., Schwarz A.J., Tsetsenis T., Ragozzino D., Gross C.T., Bifone A. A neural switch for active and passive fear. Neuron. 2010;67:656–666. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.07.008. Erratum in Neuron 2012, 73, 854.
136.Mobbs D., Headley D.B., Ding W., Dayan P. Space, Time, and Fear: Survival Computations along Defensive Circuits. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2020;24:228–241. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.12.016.
137.Xu P., Chen A., Li Y., Xing X., Lu H. Medial prefrontal cortex in neurological diseases. Physiol. Genom. 2019;51:432–442. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00006.2019.
138.Euston D.R., Gruber A.J., McNaughton B.L. The Role of Medial Prefrontal Cortex in Memory and Decision Making. Neuron. 2012;76:1057–1070. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.12.002.
139.Miller E.K., Cohen J.D. An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2001;24:167–202. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167.
140.Haller J., Mátyás F., Soproni K., Varga B., Barsy B., Németh B., Mikics É., Freund T.F., Hájos N. Correlated species differences in the effects of cannabinoid ligands on anxiety and on GABAergic and glutamatergic synaptic transmission. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2007;25:2445–2456. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05476.x.
141.Vimalanathan A., Gidyk D.C., Diwan M., Gouveia F.V., Lipsman N., Giacobbe P., Nobrega J.N., Hamani C. Endocannabinoid modulating drugs improve anxiety but not the expression of conditioned fear in a rodent model of post-traumatic stress disorder. Neuropharmacology. 2020;166:107965. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2020.107965.
142.Morena M., Berardi A., Colucci P., Palmery M., Trezza V., Hill M.N., Campolongo P. Enhancing Endocannabinoid Neurotransmission Augments The Efficacy of Extinction Training and Ameliorates Traumatic Stress-Induced Behavioral Alterations in Rats. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018;43:1284–1296. doi: 10.1038/npp.2017.305.
143.Ni X., Geller E.B., Eppihimer M.J., Eisenstein T.K., Adler M.W., Tuma R.F. Win 55212-2, a cannabinoid receptor agonist, attenuates leukocyte/endothelial interactions in an experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis model. Mult. Scler. 2004;10:158–164. doi: 10.1191/1352458504ms1009oa.
144.Herzberg U., Eliav E., Bennett G., Kopin I.J. The analgesic effects of R(+)-WIN 55,212-2 mesylate, a high affinity cannabinoid agonist, in a rat model of neuropathic pain. Neurosci. Lett. 1997;221:157–160. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3940(96)13308-5.
145.Laprairie R.B., Bagher A.M., Kelly M.E.M., Denovan-Wright E.M. Cannabidiol is a negative allosteric modulator of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2015;172:4790–4805. doi: 10.1111/bph.13250.
146.Patra P.H., Barker-Haliski M., White H.S., Whalley B.J., Glyn S., Sandhu H., Jones N., Bazelot M., Williams C.M., McNeish A.J. Cannabidiol reduces seizures and associated behavioral comorbidities in a range of animal seizure and epilepsy models. Epilepsia. 2018;60:303–314. doi: 10.1111/epi.14629.
147.Malvestio R., Medeiros P., Negrini-Ferrari S., Oliveira-Silva M., Medeiros A., Padovan C., Luongo L., Maione S., Coimbra N., de Freitas R. Cannabidiol in the prelimbic cortex modulates the comorbid condition between the chronic neuropathic pain and depression-like behaviour in rats: The role of medial prefrontal cortex 5-HT1A and CB1 receptors. Brain Res. Bull. 2021;174:323–338. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2021.06.017.
148.Vera G., López-Gómez L., Girón R., Martín-Fontelles M.I., Nurgali K., Abalo R., Uranga J.A. Effect of the Cannabinoid Agonist WIN 55,212-2 on Neuropathic and Visceral Pain Induced by a Non-Diarrheagenic Dose of the Antitumoral Drug 5-Fluorouracil in the Rat. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24:14430. doi: 10.3390/ijms241914430.
149.Pan H., Mukhopadhyay P., Rajesh M., Patel V., Mukhopadhyay B., Gao B., Haskó G., Pacher P. Cannabidiol Attenuates Cisplatin-Induced Nephrotoxicity by Decreasing Oxidative/Nitrosative Stress, Inflammation, and Cell Death. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2008;328:708–714. doi: 10.1124/jpet.108.147181.
150.Choi S.-H., Mou Y., Silva A.C. Cannabis and cannabinoid biology in stroke: Controversies, risks, and promises. Stroke. 2019;50:2640–2645. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023587.
151.Alraddadi E.A., Aljuhani F.F., Alsamiri G.Y., Hafez S.Y., Alselami G., Almarghalani D.A., Alamri F.F. The Effects of Cannabinoids on Ischemic Stroke-Associated Neuroinflammation: A Systematic Review. J. Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2025;20:12. doi: 10.1007/s11481-025-10171-z.
152.University of Colorado, Denver . CBD for Individuals at Risk of Alzheimer’s Disease. University of Colorado, Denver; Boulder County, CO, USA: 2024.
153.Hermush V., Ore L., Stern N., Mizrahi N., Fried M., Krivoshey M., Staghon E., Lederman V.E., Schleider L.B.-L. Effects of rich cannabidiol oil on behavioral disturbances in patients with dementia: A placebo controlled randomized clinical trial. Front. Med. 2022;9:951889. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.951889.
154.Akerman S., Kaube H., Goadsby P.J. Anandamide acts as a vasodilator of dural blood vessels in vivo by activating TRPV1 receptors. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2004;142:1354–1360. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705896.
155.Svendsen K.B., Jensen T.S., Bach F.W. Does the cannabinoid dronabinol reduce central pain in multiple sclerosis? Randomised double blind placebo controlled crossover trial. BMJ Br. Med. J. 2004;329:253. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38149.566979.AE.
156.May M.B., Glode A.E. Dronabinol for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting unresponsive to antiemetics. Cancer Manag. Res. 2016;8:49–55. doi: 10.2147/cmar.s81425.
157.Beal J.E., Olson R., Laubenstein L., Morales J.O., Bellman P., Yangco B., Lefkowitz L., Plasse T.F., Shepard K.V. Dronabinol as a treatment for anorexia associated with weight loss in patients with AIDS. J. Pain Symptom Manag. 1995;10:89–97. doi: 10.1016/0885-3924(94)00117-4.
158.Toledano R.S., Akirav I. Cannabidiol prevents cognitive and social deficits in a male rat model of Alzheimer’s disease through CB1 activation and inflammation modulation. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2025;50:1916–1927. doi: 10.1038/s41386-025-02213-0.
159.Singh K., Bhushan B., Chanchal D.K., Sharma S.K., Rani K., Yadav M.K., Porwal P., Kumar S., Sharma A., Virmani T., et al. Emerging Therapeutic Potential of Cannabidiol (CBD) in Neurological Disorders: A Comprehensive Review. Behav. Neurol. 2023;2023:8825358. doi: 10.1155/2023/8825358.
160.Goodland M.N., Banerjee S., Niehoff M.L., Young B.J., Macarthur H., Butler A.A., Morley J.E., Farr S.A. Cannabidiol improves learning and memory deficits and alleviates anxiety in 12-month-old SAMP8 mice. PLoS ONE. 2025;20:e0296586. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296586.
161.Ruthirakuhan M.T., Herrmann N., Gallagher D., Andreazza A.C., Kiss A., Verhoeff N.P.L., Black S.E., Lanctôt K.L. Investigating the safety and efficacy of nabilone for the treatment of agitation in patients with moderate-to-severe Alzheimer’s disease: Study protocol for a cross-over randomized controlled trial. Contemp. Clin. Trials Commun. 2019;15:100385. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100385.
162.Volicer L., Stelly M., Morris J., McLaughlin J., Volicer B. Effects of Dronabinol on anorexia and disturbed behavior in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry. 1997;12:913–919. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1166(199709)12:9<913::AID-GPS663>3.0.CO;2-D.
163.Rzepa E., Tudge L., McCabe C. The CB1 Neutral Antagonist Tetrahydrocannabivarin Reduces Default Mode Network and Increases Executive Control Network Resting State Functional Connectivity in Healthy Volunteers. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015;19:pyv092. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyv092. Erratum in Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2016, 19, pyw031.
164.Bietar B., Tanner S., Lehmann C. Neuroprotection and Beyond: The Central Role of CB1 and CB2 Receptors in Stroke Recovery. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24:16728. doi: 10.3390/ijms242316728.
165.Ruehle S., Rey A.A., Remmers F., Lutz B. The endocannabinoid system in anxiety, fear memory and habituation. J. Psychopharmacol. 2012;26 doi: 10.1177/0269881111408958.
166.Miculas D.C., Negru P.A., Bungau S.G., Behl T., Hassan S.S.U., Tit D.M. Pharmacotherapy Evolution in Alzheimer’s Disease: Current Framework and Relevant Directions. Cells. 2022;12:131. doi: 10.3390/cells12010131.
167.Hunter P. The controversy around anti-amyloid antibodies for treating Alzheimer’s disease: The European Medical Agency’s ruling against the latest anti-amyloid drugs highlights the ongoing debate about their safety and efficacy. EMBO Rep. 2024;25:131. doi: 10.1038/s44319-024-00294-4.
168.Borovac J. Side effects of a dopamine agonist therapy for Parkinson’s disease: A mini review of clinical pharmacology. Embo Rep. 2016;89:37–47.
169.Rascol O., Brooks D.J., Korczyn A.D., De Deyn P.P., Clarke C.E., Lang A.E. A five-year study of the incidence of dyskinesia in patients with early Parkinson’s disease who were treated with ropinirole or levodopa. N. Engl. J. Med. 2000;342:1484–1491. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005183422004.
170.Zhang Q., Chen X., Chen F., Wen S., Zhou C. Dopamine agonists versus levodopa monotherapy in early Parkinson’s disease for the potential risks of motor complications: A network meta-analysis. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2023;954:175884. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2023.175884.

Associated Data

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Radical Revelations: The Interplay of Nitrosative Stress, the Endocannabinoid System, and Treatment of Age-Related Disorders.

Related local records

Studies

Conditions

Cannabinoids and active compounds

Connected local records

Additional materials

Radical Revelations: The Interplay of Nitrosative Stress, the Endocannabinoid System, and Treatment of Age-Related Disorders

License

Authors

Abstract

Untitled section

Article notes

Untitled section

Author notes

1. The Endocannabinoid System

1.1. Synthesis

1.2. ECS Receptors Differentiation and Function

1.3. Mitochondria, RNS, and Nitrosative Stress

1.4. Molecular Mechanisms of Mediation

3. Overall Symptom Relief

3.1. Neuroprotection

3.2. Behavior and Cognition

4. Discussion

5. Conclusions

Acknowledgments

Abbreviations

Author Contributions

Institutional Review Board Statement

Informed Consent Statement

Data Availability Statement

Conflicts of Interest

Funding Statement

Footnotes

Footnote Group

References

Untitled section

References

Associated Data

Data Availability Statement