Cannabis use and its association with psychopathological symptoms in a Swiss adult population: a cross-sectional analysis
Clinic of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Psychiatric Services Aargau, Windisch, Switzerland
Department of Addictive Disorders, University Psychiatric Clinics Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Abstract
Background
As the most commonly used illicit substance, cannabis is gaining global acceptance through increasing legalization efforts. This shift intensifies the need for research to guide policymakers and healthcare providers in harm reduction and treatment strategies. Nonetheless, the relationship between psychopathological symptoms and cannabis use remains inadequately understood.
Methods
A sample of regular cannabis consumers completed self-reported assessments for depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), anxiety (General Anxiety Disorder-7), Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD; Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale V1.1), and psychosis (Early Recognition Inventory based on IRAOS) as well as previous black-market cannabis use patterns. Cannabis Use Disorder Identification Test Revised (CUDIT-R) was used to identify cannabis use disorder (CUD). To understand psychopathological symptom load related to cannabis consumption as well as cannabis use motives, multiple regression models were performed to identify psychopathological variables predicting cannabis use frequency and quantity. Linear regression and correlation analyses were conducted, adjusting for relevant covariates (age, gender, education, alcohol, other substance use).
Results
Three-hundred-sixty regular cannabis users interested in a study on regulated cannabis access in Basel, Switzerland were examined. In bivariate analysis, cannabis use frequency correlated with depressive (r(358) = 0.16, p = 0.003) and anxiety symptom load (r(358) = 0.11, p = 0.034). Cannabis quantity correlated with depressive (r(358) = 0.15, p = 0.005), ADHD (r(358) = 0.14, p = 0.008), and psychosis symptom load (r(358) = 0.16, p = 0.002). However, in the adjusted regression models only depressive and ADHD symptom loads were significantly associated with cannabis use frequency (p = 0.006 and p = 0.034, respectively) and quantity (p = 0.037 and p = 0.019, respectively). No significant correlations between cannabis consumption and anxiety or psychosis remained after adjustment.
Conclusion
ADHD and depressive symptoms correlate with increased cannabis use in a cohort of regular users, suggesting potential self-medication in nonclinical populations. With the rising availability of cannabis worldwide, these results highlight the necessity for longitudinal studies to disentangle the complex dynamics between cannabis consumption and mental health symptoms.
Untitled section
Keywords: cannabis use, depression, ADHD, cannabis use disorder, cannabis legalization, mental health, cannabis policy
Article notes
Untitled section
Received 2023 Dec 22; Accepted 2024 May 10; Collection date 2024.
1.Introduction
Cannabis is the most commonly consumed illicit substance, and its use is growing as attitudes toward legalization shift globally (1). Policymakers and healthcare providers increasingly rely on empirical data to make informed decisions about harm reduction and treatment options. However, the relationship between psychopathological symptoms and cannabis use remains poorly understood. Particularly, little is known about how the quantity of consumed cannabis correlates with psychopathological variables.
In the European Union alone, 22.6 million people, or 8% of the population aged 15 to 64, used cannabis at least once in the past year. This prevalence is even more pronounced among 15- to 24-year-olds, with an annual usage rate of 18.2% (2). Nearly half of treatment-seeking individuals who use cannabis report daily usage. Cannabis use is consistently increasing across Europe, a trend potentially influenced by the rapid pace of legalization efforts (1).
Previous research shows stable associations between cannabis use and mental health disorders (3) in a dose-dependent manner (4). The most robust evidence exists for psychosis, for which heavy cannabis users have a four-fold increased risk compared to non-users (5, 6). Elevated risks have also been demonstrated for depressive (7) and anxiety disorders (8). Additionally, a link between ADHD and cannabis use has been suggested, where problematic use (i.e., associated with health, financial, legal, social issues) was associated with more severe symptoms (9, 10). These specific disorders—psychosis, depression, anxiety, and ADHD—are the focus of the present study, as they represent areas in which cannabis use and mental health intersect the most.
While the direction of the relationship between cannabis use and non-psychotic disorders remains inconclusive, it is known that individuals with mental health disorders are more likely to use or misuse cannabis (11–14).
The psychoactive effects of cannabis are largely explained by tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration. As the amount of cannabis consumed and the THC concentration may vary, complicating the measurement of exposure (15). As of today, only a small number of studies employed quantity as a measure in relationship with psychopathological outcomes (16). Using cannabis more than once a week and high-potency subtypes can lead to cannabis use disorder (CUD) (17, 18).
The present literature mostly focuses on the relationship between cannabis use and acute or chronic mental illnesses. However, a large subgroup of users suffers only from minor mental health impairments and does not meet the diagnostic criteria of a psychiatric disorder (19–21). Additionally, the focus on negative implications may be one-sided, as people suffering from depression, anxiety, ADHD, or psychosis may use cannabis to mitigate symptoms (22–24).
Medical cannabis is mainly prescribed to alleviate symptoms such as anxiety, insomnia, depression, and pain (25, 26). It is equally important to understand the patterns and motivations behind regular non-medical cannabis use despite widely acknowledged risks related to consumption. Regulated cannabis markets may facilitate data collection on the frequency and quantity of consumed cannabis (27), as research on how cannabis quantity impacts mental health is scarce (16). In response to widespread cannabis use and an active black market, Switzerland amended the Narcotics Act (NarcA) in 2021, allowing 10-year pilot trials on non-medical cannabis use in adults. These trials aim to inform future regulatory frameworks and are distinct from traditional medical cannabis use, which remains tightly regulated.
The current study is based on a pilot project providing regulated cannabis access to 360 participants in a major central European city. Making use of the hitherto underutilized measure of consumed cannabis quantity may give important insights, particularly in the context of global increases in consumption and legalization (28).
Given the complexity of findings in existing literature suggesting rather a bidirectional relationship between mental health symptoms and cannabis use, we aim to explore whether among adult cannabis users, the level of symptoms of depression, anxiety, ADHD, and psychosis may be associated with the frequency and quantity of cannabis used in the last 30 days. Our study acknowledges the potential for both directions of influence. The present study aims (a) to provide a sociodemographic description of a population of non-medical cannabis users (confirmed by THC drug test) from a major central European city; (b) to describe the patterns and motives of cannabis use; (c) to investigate the relationship between psychopathological variables and self-reported frequency as well as quantity of cannabis used in the last 30 days.
2.Materials and methods
2.1.Design
The present cross-sectional study is part of a single-center randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) called WeedCare (NCT05522205), which aims to investigate the effects of regulated cannabis access on consumption behavior and mental and physical health in comparison to the illicit market. The study has been approved by the local Ethics Committee (Ethikkommission Nordwest- und Zentralschweiz (EKNZ)), as well as by the Swiss Federal Public Health Office, and is conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the ICH-GCP guidelines. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups: Group 1 has immediate access to the regulated cannabis sale in pharmacies, whereas Group 2 continues to purchase cannabis on the illicit market. After 6 months all participants also gained access to regulated cannabis in pharmacies for two consecutive years, ensuring consistent quality and THC content for all. Cannabis pricing was subsidized throughout, mirroring illicit market rates to facilitate realistic consumption scenarios. Every 6 months, participants are invited to answer online questionnaires on their cannabis consumption behavior as well as their mental and physical health. The entire study duration is 2.5 years. The detailed study protocol has been published elsewhere (29). Importantly, the present article covers only the baseline data of the study. Results on the regulated cannabis access for recreational use will be presented in future articles.
2.2.Eligibility criteria
Individuals eligible for inclusion in the study provided written consent, were 18 years or older, and demonstrated monthly cannabis use over the past 6 months as confirmed by THC in urinalysis. Participants also needed to have sufficient proficiency of the German language as well as internet access to complete the required questionnaires (29). In agreement with local law, only residents of the canton Basel-Stadt were eligible for participation. Exclusion criteria were current psychiatric hospitalization, acute suicidality or psychosis, severe cognitive impairment that could preclude informed consent, and pregnant or breastfeeding women. Eligibility was contingent on exclusion criteria assessed through comprehensive face-to-face screenings with a study physician, ensuring no significant health conditions were present.
2.3.Recruitment
A local media conference in August 2022 informed the Swiss public about the study. Interested individuals had an opportunity to register online, after which they were contacted via phone for an eligibility screening. They were then invited to a face-to-face interview with a study physician, in which detailed information about the study was provided, and written informed consent was obtained following the evaluation of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Recruitment of 374 participants started in September 2022 and completed in December 2022. Fourteen initially included participants dropped out from the study due to lack of interest or incomplete responses to the online questionnaire.
2.4.Data collection
Data sets were collected in January 2023 from 360 participants to gain sociodemographic information. Cannabis use days in the last 30 days and quantity of cannabis used per average use day (g) as well as cannabis use motives were evaluated via the Comprehensive Short Questionnaire of Current Cannabis Use (29). To facilitate the specification of cannabis quantity, participants were provided pictures of different amounts of cannabis flower and hashish in relation to a coin.
Depressive symptoms were assessed via the Patient Health Questionnaire depression scale (PHQ-9) (30), anxiety via the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7) (31), and ADHD via the World Health Organization (WHO) adult ADHD self-report scale (ASRS V1.1) (32). Psychosis was assessed via an adapted version of the Early Recognition Inventory (ERIraos) Checklist (33). This includes six items of the ERIraos on increased psychosis risk and early psychosis, respectively, and two additional items: “impression that certain occurrences are intended only for me” and “diagnosis of psychosis or schizophrenia by a medical professional, psychologist, or another health care professional in the last six months.” This tool is adept at identifying even nuanced psychotic symptoms essential for evaluating early cannabis-related psychopathology. Further substance use data was collected using the Cannabis Use Disorders Identification Test-Revised (CUDIT-R) (34) as well as the three-item version of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT-C) (35). The use of other legal and illegal psychotropic substances was assessed via an adapted version of the Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST) (36). Specifically, the frequency of use during the last 6 months (0 never; 1 once or twice; 2 monthly; 3 weekly; 4 daily or almost daily) was asked for a set of 7 drug types corresponding to those used in the ASSIST.
2.5.Statistics
To examine the association between psychopathological scores and cannabis use, multiple linear regressions were computed. The following psychopathological scores served as independent variables: depressive symptom load (PHQ-9), anxiety symptom load (GAD-7), ADHD symptom load (ASRS-V1.1) and psychosis symptom load (ERIRaos). Each score was the sum of the single items of the respective scale. Cannabis use days in the past 30 days (in days) and cannabis quantity consumed in the past 30 days (in gram) served as dependent variables. The latter was computed by multiplying the number of reported use days by the reported average quantity consumed per day. Pearson correlations were initially used to assess the relationships between each of the four independent variables with each of the two dependent variables. Subsequently, by means of linear regressions, these eight correlations were adjusted for age, gender, education level, the AUDIT-C, and the ASSIST. Gender and education level were dummy coded with the categories ‘male’ and ‘university degree’ as the reference, respectively. AUDIT-C and ASSIST each formed a regressor after creating individual summarized scores across the three and seven items, respectively. Hence, a total of eight multiple linear regressions were computed.
To meet the assumptions of linear regression, particularly the normal distribution of residuals, both dependent variables and the four psychopathological scores were logarithmically calculated for inferential statistics. Analyses were conducted with R software version 4.2.1 (37). p-values were 2-sided, and statistical significance was set at α = 0.05.
3.Results
Study participants identified largely as male (80.8%), with a mean age of 35.8 years. Most participants had a university degree, lived alone, and were fully employed. A complete description of the sociodemographic profile of the study population can be found in Table 1. On average, participants consumed cannabis on nearly 19 days during the last 30 days with a mean use quantity of 1.46 grams per average use day. Results for cannabis consumption patterns, as well as psychopathological variables and other substance use, are presented in Table 2. Detailed results regarding cannabis use motives can be found in (Supplementary Figure S1).
| Gender | Female | 63 (17.5%) |
| Male | 291 (80.8%) | |
| Non-binary | 6 (1.7%) | |
| Age in years | Mean (range) | 35.8 (18–76) |
| Nationality | Swiss | 269 (74.7%) |
| Other | 91 (25.3%) | |
| Level of education | Obligatory schooling | 34 (9.4%) |
| Basic vocational education | 110 (30.6%) | |
| University qualification | 55 (15.3%) | |
| Higher vocational education | 27 (7.5%) | |
| University degree | 131 (36.4%) | |
| Other | 3 (0.8%) | |
| Form of living | Single person household | 136 (37.8%) |
| Couple without child(ren) | 87 (24.2%) | |
| Couple with child(ren) | 42 (11.7%) | |
| Single parent household with child(ren) | 17 (4.7%) | |
| Other households with more than one person | 78 (21.7%) | |
| Employment | Employed, full-time | 163 (45.3%) |
| Employed, part-time (< 90%) | 70 (19.4%) | |
| Student, full-time employed (90–100%) | 7 (1.9%) | |
| Student, part-time employed (< 90%) | 34 (9.4%) | |
| Unemployed | 68 (18.9%) | |
| Economically inactive | 18 (5.0%) |
| Assessment tools | Mean (SD) | Range | Probable condition (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| PHQ-9 (depression) | 5.30 (3.63) | 0–19 | 3.06 |
| GAD-7 (anxiety) | 3.81 (3.39) | 0–18 | 1.94 |
| ASRS V1.1 (ADHD) | 1.64 (1.50) | 0–6 | 14.17 |
| ERIaos (psychosis) | 0.51 (0.93) | 0–7 | 0.56 |
| CUDIT-R (CUD) | 11.09 (4.45) | 1–27 | 33.9 |
| AUDIT-C | 3.71 (2.53) | 0–12 | |
| ASSIST adapted (Other Substance Use) | 1.29 (2.10) | 0–15 | |
| Average cannabis use | 30 days use quantity mean (SD) | 18.73 (10.91) | |
| Average daily use quantity** mean (SD) | 1.46 (2.84) | ||
| Estimated use per month mean (SD) | 34.27 (78.80) | ||
3.1.Associations with psychopathological symptom load
Cannabis use frequency was significantly correlated with depression and anxiety scores (r(358) = 0.16, p = 0.003 and r(358) = 0.11, p = 0.034, respectively)). Correlations between depression, ADHD, as well as psychosis, and cannabis quantity were also statistically significant (r(358) = 0.15, p = 0.005; r(358) = 0.14, p = 0.008; r(358) = 0.16, p = 0.002, respectively). A trend for ADHD and psychosis was observed with cannabis use frequency (r(358) = 0.10, p = 0.060 and (r(358) = 0.09, p = 0.086). Anxiety also correlated marginally significant with cannabis use quantity (r(358) = 0.09, p = 0.098). The following significant relationships persisted in regression models after adjustment for the mentioned covariates.
The depression composite score was a significant predictor of cannabis use, specifically affecting the frequency (p = 0.006; β = 0.269; t(348) = 2.79; 95% CI [0.080, 0.458]), and quantity (p = 0.037; β = 0.350; t(348) = 2.09; 95% CI [0.022, 0.677]). Similarly, the ADHD scores significantly predicted cannabis use frequency (p = 0.034; β = 0.314; t(348) = 2.13; 95% CI [0.025, 0.603]); and quantity (p = 0.019; β = 0.599; t(348) = 2.36; 95% CI [0.102, 1.097]). The association between anxiety symptom load and cannabis frequency reached only marginal significance (β = 0.177; t(348) = 1.82; 95% CI [−0.014, 0.368]; p = 0.070). There were no significant associations between anxiety symptom load and cannabis quantity, nor for psychosis symptom load with any of the two consumption measures.
All education levels below university degree were significantly associated with higher frequency and quantity of cannabis use in all four psychopathological scores. A positive association was observed between quantity of cannabis use and use of other drugs, but not alcohol use. Detailed results from the regression models are presented below in Tables 3–6, which illustrate these associations and provide a more comprehensive view of the data.
| Cannabis use frequency | Cannabis quantity | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate | SE | 95% CI | p | Estimate | SE | 95% CI | p | |
| Depression | ||||||||
| Intercept | 1.995 | 0.243 | 1.519–2.471 | <0.001 | 1.031 | 0.420 | 0.207–1.854 | 0.015 |
| PHQ-9 Score | 0.269 | 0.097 | 0.080–0.458 | 0.006 | 0.350 | 0.167 | 0.022–0.677 | 0.037 |
| Age | 0.004 | 0.003 | −0.001 – 0.010 | 0.107 | 0.006 | 0.005 | −0.004 – 0.015 | 0.226 |
| Gender (Reference.: Male) | ||||||||
| Female | −0.165 | 0.083 | −0.327 – −0.004 | 0.046 | −0.127 | 0.143 | −0.407 – 0.153 | 0.374 |
| Non-binary | 0.344 | 0.234 | −0.114 – 0.801 | 0.142 | −0.490 | 0.404 | −1.283 – 0.302 | 0.226 |
| Education level (Reference: University Degree) | ||||||||
| Higher Vocational Education | 0.284 | 0.120 | 0.049–0.519 | 0.018 | 0.492 | 0.208 | 0.086–0.899 | 0.018 |
| University Qualification | 0.367 | 0.092 | 0.186–0.548 | <0.001 | 0.558 | 0.160 | 0.245–0.871 | <0.001 |
| Basic Vocational Education | 0.428 | 0.073 | 0.285–0.571 | <0.001 | 1.028 | 0.126 | 0.780–1.276 | <0.001 |
| Obligatory Schooling | 0.388 | 0.111 | 0.171–0.605 | <0.001 | 1.329 | 0.192 | 0.953–1.705 | <0.001 |
| Other | 0.656 | 0.334 | 0.001–1.310 | 0.050 | 1.257 | 0.578 | 0.124–2.389 | 0.030 |
| Additional substance use | ||||||||
| Alcohol Use | −0.017 | 0.012 | −0.040 – 0.007 | 0.171 | −0.037 | 0.021 | −0.079 – 0.004 | 0.075 |
| Other Drug Use | 0.011 | 0.015 | −0.018 – 0.039 | 0.470 | 0.059 | 0.025 | 0.010–0.109 | 0.020 |
| R-squared | 0.152 | F(11, 348) | 5.690 | R-squared | 0.250 | F(11, 348) | 10.560 | |
| adj. R-squared | 0.126 | p | <0.001 | adj. R-squared | 0.227 | p | <0.001 | |
| Cannabis use frequency | Cannabis quantity | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate | SE | 95% CI | p | Estimate | SE | 95% CI | p | |
| Psychosis | ||||||||
| Intercept | 2.385 | 0.388 | 1.625–3.145 | <0.001 | 1.034 | 0.667 | −0.273 – 2.341 | 0.122 |
| ERIraos (adapted) Score | 0.072 | 0.219 | −0.358 – 0.502 | 0.742 | 0.407 | 0.377 | −0.331 – 1.146 | 0.281 |
| Age | 0.004 | 0.003 | −0.001 – 0.010 | 0.103 | 0.006 | 0.005 | −0.003 – 0.015 | 0.205 |
| Gender (Reference: Male) | ||||||||
| Female | −0.115 | 0.081 | −0.274 – 0.045 | 0.160 | −0.068 | 0.140 | −0.343 – 0.206 | 0.626 |
| Non-binary | 0.407 | 0.235 | −0.055 – 0.868 | 0.085 | −0.434 | 0.405 | −1.228 – 0.359 | 0.284 |
| Education level (Reference: University Degree) | ||||||||
| Higher Vocational Education | 0.275 | 0.121 | 0.037–0.513 | 0.024 | 0.473 | 0.209 | 0.064–0.882 | 0.024 |
| University Qualification | 0.371 | 0.094 | 0.187–0.555 | <0.001 | 0.547 | 0.162 | 0.230–0.864 | <0.001 |
| Basic Vocational Education | 0.428 | 0.075 | 0.282–0.574 | <0.001 | 1.013 | 0.128 | 0.761–1.264 | <0.001 |
| Obligatory Schooling | 0.419 | 0.115 | 0.194–0.645 | <0.001 | 1.328 | 0.198 | 0.941–1.715 | <0.001 |
| Other | 0.562 | 0.336 | −0.096 – 1.220 | 0.095 | 1.153 | 0.578 | 0.021–2.285 | 0.047 |
| Additional substance use | ||||||||
| Alcohol Use | −0.013 | 0.012 | −0.037 – 0.011 | 0.274 | −0.034 | 0.021 | −0.075 – 0.008 | 0.111 |
| Other Drug Use | 0.019 | 0.015 | −0.009 – 0.048 | 0.185 | 0.068 | 0.025 | 0.019–0.117 | 0.007 |
| R-squared | 0.134 | F(11, 348) | 4.880 | R-squared | 0.243 | F(11, 348) | 10.180 | |
| adj. R-squared | 0.106 | p | <0.001 | adj. R-squared | 0.219 | p | <0.001 | |
| Cannabis use frequency | Cannabis quantity | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate | SE | 95% CI | p | Estimate | SE | 95% CI | p | |
| Anxiety | ||||||||
| Intercept | 2.182 | 0.239 | 1.714–2.651 | <0.001 | 1.640 | 0.414 | 0.830–2.451 | <0.001 |
| GAD-7 Score | 0.177 | 0.097 | −0.014 – 0.368 | 0.070 | 0.027 | 0.169 | −0.304 – 0.357 | 0.875 |
| Age | 0.005 | 0.003 | −0.001 – 0.010 | 0.080 | 0.006 | 0.005 | −0.003 – 0.015 | 0.220 |
| Gender (Reference: Male) | ||||||||
| Female | −0.133 | 0.081 | −0.292 – 0.027 | 0.103 | −0.097 | 0.140 | −0.371 – 0.177 | 0.488 |
| Non-binary | 0.396 | 0.233 | −0.061 – 0.853 | 0.091 | −0.432 | 0.401 | −1.219 – 0.354 | 0.282 |
| Education level (Reference: University Degree) | ||||||||
| Higher Vocational Education | 0.304 | 0.122 | 0.066–0.543 | 0.013 | 0.487 | 0.210 | 0.075–0.900 | 0.021 |
| University Qualification | 0.373 | 0.093 | 0.191–0.554 | <0.001 | 0.568 | 0.161 | 0.253–0.883 | <0.001 |
| Basic Vocational Education | 0.429 | 0.074 | 0.285–0.573 | <0.001 | 1.032 | 0.127 | 0.783–1.281 | <0.001 |
| Obligatory Schooling | 0.394 | 0.112 | 0.174–0.614 | <0.001 | 1.378 | 0.194 | 0.998–1.758 | <0.001 |
| Other | 0.619 | 0.336 | −0.039 – 1.276 | 0.066 | 1.139 | 0.581 | 0.000–2.277 | 0.051 |
| Additional substance use | ||||||||
| Alcohol Use | −0.014 | 0.012 | −0.037 – 0.010 | 0.265 | −0.033 | 0.021 | −0.074 – 0.008 | 0.116 |
| Other Drug Use | 0.013 | 0.015 | −0.017 – 0.042 | 0.401 | 0.070 | 0.026 | 0.020–0.121 | 0.007 |
| R-squared | 0.142 | F(11, 348) | 5.220 | R-squared | 0.241 | F(11, 348) | 10.040 | |
| adj. R-squared | 0.114 | p | <0.001 | adj. R-squared | 0.217 | p | <0.001 | |
| Cannabis use frequency | Cannabis quantity | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate | SE | 95% CI | p | Estimate | SE | 95% CI | p | |
| ADHD | ||||||||
| Intercept | 1.961 | 0.301 | 1.370–2.551 | <0.001 | 0.657 | 0.518 | −0.359 – 1.672 | 0.206 |
| ASRS-V.1.1 Score | 0.314 | 0.148 | 0.025–0.603 | 0.034 | 0.599 | 0.254 | 0.102–1.097 | 0.019 |
| Age | 0.005 | 0.003 | 0.000–0.011 | 0.053 | 0.007 | 0.005 | −0.002 – 0.017 | 0.115 |
| Gender (Reference: Male) | ||||||||
| Female | −0.133 | 0.081 | −0.292 – 0.027 | 0.103 | −0.097 | 0.140 | −0.371 – 0.177 | 0.488 |
| Non-binary | 0.396 | 0.233 | −0.061 – 0.853 | 0.091 | −0.432 | 0.401 | −1.219 – 0.354 | 0.282 |
| Education level (Reference: University Degree) | ||||||||
| Higher Vocational Education | 0.288 | 0.121 | 0.052–0.524 | 0.017 | 0.505 | 0.207 | 0.098–0.911 | 0.015 |
| University Qualification | 0.382 | 0.093 | 0.200–0.564 | <0.001 | 0.582 | 0.159 | 0.269–0.895 | <0.001 |
| Basic Vocational Education | 0.441 | 0.074 | 0.297–0.585 | <0.001 | 1.050 | 0.126 | 0.802–1.298 | <0.001 |
| Obligatory Schooling | 0.400 | 0.111 | 0.183–0.618 | <0.001 | 1.328 | 0.191 | 0.953–1.702 | <0.001 |
| Other | 0.539 | 0.334 | −0.115 – 1.192 | 0.107 | 1.093 | 0.574 | −0.031 – 2.218 | 0.058 |
| Additional substance use | ||||||||
| Alcohol Use | −0.016 | 0.012 | −0.039 – 0.008 | 0.204 | −0.037 | 0.021 | −0.078 – 0.004 | 0.075 |
| Other Drug Use | 0.011 | 0.015 | −0.018 – 0.041 | 0.440 | 0.055 | 0.026 | 0.005–0.105 | 0.031 |
| R-squared | 0.145 | F(11, 348) | 5.350 | R-squared | 0.253 | F(11, 348) | 10.700 | |
| adj. R-squared | 0.118 | p | <0.001 | adj. R-squared | 0.229 | p | <0.001 | |
4.Discussion
4.1.Main findings
Our cross-sectional study elucidates the intricate relationship between psychopathological symptoms and cannabis use in nonclinical settings. After adjusting for important covariates, we observed significant positive associations between depressive symptoms and both cannabis use frequency and quantity. Similarly, ADHD symptoms were positively associated with cannabis use frequency and quantity. In contrast, associations with use frequency for anxiety and psychosis symptoms did not reach the significance level. The specific associations with different psychopathological variables highlight the need for a nuanced consideration of the factors influencing cannabis use. It is noteworthy that the likelihood of other mental illnesses was relatively low (with a probability of conditions ranging from <1 to 14%), in contrast to a 33.8% probability for the CUD, which was previously associated with increased mental health disorders among cannabis users (38).
The most commonly reported motivation for cannabis use among our participants was the pursuit of feeling good, providing additional context for these findings.
4.2.Psychopathologic symptom load and cannabis use
Our results are consistent with previous studies (26, 39, 40), that also reported a positive correlation between depression and cannabis use.
The associations between ADHD and cannabis use frequency were shown by previous studies, although none of them evaluated the use days on an interval scale (23, 41–43). Moreover, contrary to Fergusson et al., our outcomes remained significant after adjustment for other substance use as well (42). This suggests the possibility of an independent risk associated with cannabis consumption for ADHD symptom load among regular users, although the links between the two entities are complex and are beyond the scope of this paper (12, 44, 45). For example, a causal and temporal relationship for lifetime cannabis use was found in individuals with ADHD based on large data from genome-wide association studies with a two-sample Mendelian randomization approach. Individuals with ADHD were eight times likelier to use cannabis in their lifetime compared to those without the disorder (p = 0.00006) (44). A dose-dependent relationship was found for both hyperactive–impulsive and inattentive symptoms of ADHD with cannabis consumption (45). The co-occurrence of ADHD and CUD was discussed thoroughly in the literature (12).
While our findings align with much of the existing literature, there were some notable exceptions, particularly concerning the relationship between cannabis use and psychosis. Despite a large body of evidence connecting cannabis use to psychosis (6, 24, 46) our findings do not confirm this relationship, likely because of the exclusion of individuals suffering from acute psychosis. Similarly, the relationship between psychosis and high-potency cannabis was also not confirmed in a recent cross-sectional study with a similar study population to ours (4).
We found only marginal associations between anxiety and cannabis use. In a recent systematic review and meta-analysis of 10 studies, Xue et al. showed that cannabis use was associated with increased odds for the development of anxiety conditions (OR = 1.25; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.54); however, no significant associations were found for GAD, social anxiety disorder, or panic disorder (8). Feingold et al. also did not find links between anxiety and cannabis use (47).
4.3.Cannabis use patterns
Cannabis consumption patterns observed in our study sample were similar to those reported by Caulkins et al. with an average monthly use of 34.27 g and a mean of 1.46 g use per day (16).Additionally, the mean days with cannabis use in the last 30 days of our sample (18.73) falls within the range of 15 to 23 days reported by the U.S. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (48, 49).
One third of the participants were classified at high risk for developing CUD, a rate that mirrors the one in three chance of cannabis dependence with weekly or more frequent usage as indicated by Leung et al. (17). However, it is important to note that while the systematic review and meta-analysis by Leung et al. reported a lower general estimate of 22% for developing CUD, they also documented a 13% prevalence of ‘cannabis addiction’ and a further 13% for ‘cannabis dependence’ (17). This comparative context underscores that our cohort’s risk level, despite a possibly higher than weekly consumption, is consistent with established findings for probable CUD occurrence.
The interactions between cannabis use frequency and quantity and CUD were highlighted in a recent analysis of over 3,000 participants (16). To reduce the likelihood of misjudgment of self-reported cannabis quantity by users (50), our study provided pictures of dosage examples in combination with quantity information in the questionnaire for the objective self-assessment (29). These methods were previously found to improve the accuracy of judgment (51).
Previous studies reported a negative impact of cannabis use on educational attainment at all levels (19, 52, 53). We further found that compared to a university degree, people with lower levels of education consume significantly more cannabis (both in terms of frequency and quantity). Other studies also showed that early-life cannabis use was associated with poor academic achievements and decline in Intelligence Quotient (IQ) (53–55). It is noteworthy to indicate that our sample had a higher level of education compared to the general population in Switzerland (56), which could have influenced the results to some degree.
Individuals with mental problems are known to consume cannabis more often, presumably for reasons of self-medication (57–60). However, the most common reason for cannabis use among our participants was “feeling good,” and only a minority reported help with concentration or psychological distress. This finding can again be explained by the fact that individuals with current severe mental disorders were excluded from the study.
The data imply that subclinical presentations of depression and ADHD could be driving higher consumption frequencies and volumes. This necessitates longitudinal studies to clarify whether consumption is a coping mechanism or a contributing factor to maintaining subclinical states.
Lastly, our findings indicated a positive association between cannabis quantity with other substance use. Similar links were shown between the frequency of cannabis consumption and the use of other substances (61). This pattern was notably evident in the consumption of amphetamines among participants with ADHD, which may indicate prescribed use. Such complexities reinforce the need for nuanced interpretations. These outcomes contribute to the already large body of evidence regarding frequent co-use of several illicit substances (62–64).
4.4.Study limitations, strengths and future directions
The cross-sectional design of our study necessitates a prudent approach to interpreting the findings precluding assessments of causality. Our sample mainly included psychologically healthy individuals motivated to participate in the pilot study, limiting the generalizability of our results and potentially contributing to discrepancies with other studies. The self-selection of participants and exclusion of individuals with acute psychosis or severe cognitive impairments further limited the sample’s representativeness.
However, these limitations are counterbalanced by several methodological strengths. First, we employed objective measures for quantifying cannabis use, including picture-based guidance for participant self-reporting. Second, our sample was drawn from a representative population of regular adult cannabis users in a major European city, which was validated by THC drug tests. Third, our analyses accounted for key confounding variables which were assessed by validated psychometric instruments, bolstering the potential independent effects of cannabis use on depressive and ADHD symptomatology. For the purposes of informing policy, the focus on a more representative population of regular cannabis users, as opposed to individuals with significant psychiatric comorbidities—who are generally advised against cannabis use—adds value to our findings.
Considering the findings of our study, future research should focus on longitudinal studies to explore causal relationships between cannabis use and psychopathological symptoms. A detailed examination of various aspects of cannabis consumption, including frequency, duration, and dosage, will provide deeper insights into its relationship with mental health disorders. Additionally, future studies should consider subgroups underrepresented in our research, such as individuals with existing mental health conditions, and investigate the role of socioeconomic and cultural factors in shaping cannabis use and its associated psychopathological symptoms. This approach will significantly deepen our understanding of the complex interplay between cannabis use and mental health.
5.Conclusion
In summary, we present a nuanced portrait of a predominantly psychologically healthy, drug-test-confirmed cohort of regular cannabis users. We observed a socially integrated, high-achieving sample with a low prevalence of CUD. The prevalence of other mental health disorders within this cohort was surprisingly low. Moreover, an association between depression and ADHD symptomatology with quantitative parameters of cannabis use was established, with no significant associations for anxiety and psychosis. These findings imply that subclinical presentations of depression and ADHD might be influencing higher consumption patterns, which underscores the importance of longitudinal studies to discern whether consumption functions as a coping mechanism or contributes to the maintenance of subclinical states. Our study advances the discussion on cannabis regulation, emphasizing the necessity of a nuanced approach in both public discourse and policy design, considering the complex relationship between cannabis use and mental health.
As the legal landscape surrounding cannabis continues to evolve, our findings emphasize the importance of focusing on evidence-based prevention, harm reduction, and safer use. Furthermore, this study’s findings contribute significantly to the ongoing discussions on cannabis policy and health regulation. By providing empirical data on the health impacts of regulated versus unregulated cannabis, this study supports the need for continued research and could inform future policy decisions aimed at improving public health outcomes in the context of cannabis legalization.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by Ethikkommission Nordwest- und Zentralschweiz (EKNZ). The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Acknowledgments
We thank our study participants for their cooperation and valuable contribution to our research.
Funding Statement
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The study received funding from the canton Basel-Stadt. The WEED CARE study is supported by the Canton Basel-Stadt, Switzerland (Nr. 21/30/19; P211352). The funding had no role in study design and preparation of this manuscript, and will not have any role nor and will not have any role in data collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1356988/full#supplementary-material
References
Untitled section
References
- 1.Manthey J, Jacobsen B, Hayer T, Kalke J, López-Pelayo H, Pons-Cabrera MT, et al. The impact of legal cannabis availability on cannabis use and health outcomes: a systematic review. Int J Drug Policy. (2023) 116:104039. doi: 10.1016/J.DRUGPO.2023.104039, PMID:
- 2.European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction . European drug report 2023: Trends and developments Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; (2023). https://www.emcdda.europa.eu/publications/european-drug-report/2023_en
- 3.Hines LA, Freeman TP, Gage SH, Zammit S, Hickman M, Cannon M. Association of High-Potency Cannabis use with mental health and substance use in adolescence. JAMA Psychiatry. (2020) 77:1044–51. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.1035, PMID:
- 4.Petrilli K, Hines L, Adams S, Morgan CJ, Curran HV, Freeman TP. High potency cannabis use, mental health symptoms and cannabis dependence: triangulating the evidence. Addict Behav. (2023) 144:107740. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2023.107740, PMID:
- 5.Di Forti M, Quattrone D, Freeman TP, Tripoli G, Gayer-Anderson C, Quigley H, et al. The contribution of cannabis use to variation in the incidence of psychotic disorder across Europe (EU-GEI): a multicentre case-control study. Lancet Psychiatry. (2019) 6:427–36. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30048-3, PMID:
- 6.Marconi A, Di Forti M, Lewis CM, Murray RM, Vassos E. Meta-analysis of the association between the level of cannabis use and risk of psychosis. Schizophr Bull. (2016) 42:1262–9. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbw003, PMID:
- 7.Solmi M, De Toffol M, Kim JY, Choi MJ, Stubbs B, Thompson T, et al. Balancing risks and benefits of cannabis use: umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials and observational studies. BMJ. (2023) 382:e072348. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-072348, PMID:
- 8.Xue S, Husain MI, Zhao H, Ravindran AV. Cannabis use and prospective long-term association with anxiety: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of longitudinal studies: usage du cannabis et association prospective à long Terme avec l’anxiété: Une revue systématique et Une méta-analyse d’études longitudinales. Can J Psychiatr. (2021) 66:126–38. doi: 10.1177/0706743720952251, PMID:
- 9.De Alwis D, Lynskey MT, Reiersen AM, Agrawal A. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder subtypes and substance use and use disorders in NESARC. Addict Behav. (2014) 39:1278–85. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.04.003, PMID:
- 10.Kolla NJ, van der Maas M, Toplak ME, Erickson PG, Mann RE, Seeley J, et al. Adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptom profiles and concurrent problems with alcohol and cannabis: sex differences in a representative, population survey. BMC Psychiatry. (2016) 16:1–9. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0746-4
- 11.Gobbi G, Atkin T, Zytynski T, Wang S, Askari S, Boruff J, et al. Association of cannabis use in adolescence and risk of depression, anxiety, and suicidality in young adulthood: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. (2019) 76:426–34. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.4500, PMID:
- 12.Gujska JH, Silczuk A, Madejek R, Szulc A. Exploring the link between attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and Cannabis use disorders: a review. Medical Sci Monitor: Int J Clin Exp. (2023) 29:e939749–1. doi: 10.12659/MSM.939749, PMID:
- 13.Lev-Ran S, Roerecke M, le Foll B, George TP, McKenzie K, Rehm J. The association between cannabis use and depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychol Med. (2014) 44:797–810. doi: 10.1017/S0033291713001438, PMID:
- 14.Urits I, Gress K, Charipova K, Li N, Berger AA, Cornett EM, et al. Cannabis use and its association with psychological disorders. Psychopharmacol Bull. (2020) 50:56–67. PMID:
- 15.Taylor DR, Hall W. Respiratory health effects of cannabis: position statement of the Thoracic Society of Australia and new Zealand. Intern Med J. (2003) 33:310–3. doi: 10.1046/J.1445-5994.2003.00401.X, PMID:
- 16.Callaghan RC, Sanches M, Kish SJ. Quantity and frequency of cannabis use in relation to cannabis-use disorder and cannabis-related problems. Drug Alcohol Depend. (2020) 217:108271. doi: 10.1016/J.DRUGALCDEP.2020.108271, PMID:
- 17.Leung J, Chan GC, Hides L, Hall WD. What is the prevalence and risk of cannabis use disorders among people who use cannabis? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Addict Behav. (2020) 109:106479. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106479, PMID:
- 18.Petrilli K, Ofori S, Hines L, Taylor G, Adams S, Freeman TP. Association of cannabis potency with mental ill health and addiction: a systematic review. Lancet Psychiatry. (2022) 9:736–50. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(22)00161-4, PMID:
- 19.Boden JM, Dhakal B, Foulds JA, Horwood LJ. Life-course trajectories of cannabis use: a latent class analysis of a New Zealand birth cohort. Addiction. (2020) 115:279–90. doi: 10.1111/ADD.14814
- 20.Budney AJ, Sofis MJ, Borodovsky JT. An update on cannabis use disorder with comment on the impact of policy related to therapeutic and recreational cannabis use. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. (2019) 269:73–86. doi: 10.1007/S00406-018-0976-1, PMID:
- 21.Sultan RS, Zhang AW, Olfson M, Kwizera MH, Levin FR. Nondisordered Cannabis use among US adolescents. JAMA Netw Open. (2023) 6:e2311294. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.11294, PMID:
- 22.Cuttler C, Spradlin A, McLaughlin RJ. A naturalistic examination of the perceived effects of cannabis on negative affect. J Affect Disord. (2018) 235:198–205. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.04.054, PMID:
- 23.Mitchell JT, Sweitzer MM, Tunno AM, Kollins SH, Joseph McClernon F. “I use weed for my ADHD”: a qualitative analysis of online forum discussions on cannabis use and ADHD. PLoS One. (2016) 11:e0156614. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156614, PMID:
- 24.Hasan A, von Keller R, Friemel CM, Hall W, Schneider M, Koethe D, et al. Cannabis use and psychosis: a review of reviews. Int J Clin Exp. (2020) 270:403–12. doi: 10.1007/s00406-019-01068-z
- 25.Feingold D, Brill S, Goor-Aryeh I, Delayahu Y, Lev-Ran S. Depression level, not pain severity, is associated with smoked medical marijuana dosage among chronic pain patients. J Psychosom Res. (2020) 135:110130. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110130
- 26.Kosiba JD, Maisto SA, Ditre JW. Patient-reported use of medical cannabis for pain, anxiety, and depression symptoms: systematic review and meta-analysis. Soc Sci Med. (2019) 233:181–92. doi: 10.1016/J.SOCSCIMED.2019.06.005, PMID:
- 27.Lake S, Nosova E, Buxton J, Walsh Z, Socías ME, Hayashi K, et al. Characterizing motivations for cannabis use in a cohort of people who use illicit drugs: a latent class analysis. PLoS One. (2020) 15:e0233463. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233463, PMID:
- 28.Bahji A, Stephenson C. International perspectives on the implications of cannabis legalization: a systematic review & thematic analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2019) 16:3095. doi: 10.3390/IJERPH16173095, PMID:
- 29.Baltes-Flueckiger L, Steinauer R, Meyer M, Vogel M, Walter M. Effects of cannabis regulation in Switzerland: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial. Front Psychol. (2023) 14:1139325. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1139325, PMID:
- 30.Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JBW. & patient health questionnaire primary care study group. Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. JAMA. (1999) 282:1737–44. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.18.1737, PMID:
- 31.Löwe B, Müller S, Brähler E, Kroenke K, Albani C, Decker O. Validierung und Normierung eines kurzen Selbstratinginstrumentes zur Generalisierten Angst (GAD-7) in einer repräsentativen Stichprobe der deutschen Allgemeinbevölkerung. PPmP - Psychotherapie · Psychosomatik · Medizinische Psychologie. (2007) 57:A050. doi: 10.1055/S-2007-970669
- 32.Kessler R, Adler L, Ames M, Demler O, Faraone S, Hirpi E, et al. The World Health Organization adult ADHD self-report scale (ASRS): a short screening scale for use in the general population. Psychol Med. (2005) 35:245–56. doi: 10.1017/S0033291704002892, PMID:
- 33.Maurer K, Hörrmann F, Trendler G, Schmidt M, Häfner H, Maier W, et al. Identification of psychosis risk by the early recognition inventory (ERIraos) - description of the schedules and preliminary results on reliability and validity of the checklist. Nervenheilkunde. (2006) 25:11–6. doi: 10.1055/S-0038-1626434/ID/JR1626434-13/BIB
- 34.Adamson SJ, Kay-Lambkin FJ, Baker AL, Lewin TJ, Thornton L, Kelly BJ, et al. An improved brief measure of cannabis misuse: the Cannabis use disorders identification test-revised (CUDIT-R). Drug Alcohol Depend. (2010) 110:137–43. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.02.017, PMID:
- 35.Babor TF, Higgins-Biddle JC, Saunders JB, Monteiro MG, World Health Organization . (2001). AUDIT: the alcohol use disorders identification test: guidelines for use in primary health care (No. WHO/MSD/MSB/01.6 a). Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-MSD-MSB-01.6a [Accessed August 17, 2023]. World Health Organization.
- 36.Humeniuk R, Henry-Edwards S, Ali R, Poznyak V, Monteiro MG, World Health Organization . (2010). The Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST): manual for use in primary care. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/978924159938-2 [Accessed August 17, 2023].
- 37.R Core Team . (2022) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.R-project.org
- 38.Connor JP, Stjepanović D, Le Foll B, Hoch E, Budney AJ, Hall WD. Cannabis use and cannabis use disorder. Nat Rev Dis Primers. (2021) 7:16. doi: 10.1038/s41572-021-00247-4, PMID:
- 39.Gorfinkel LR, Stohl M, Hasin D. Association of depression with past-month cannabis use among US adults aged 20 to 59 years, 2005 to 2016. JAMA Netw Open. (2020) 3:e2013802–2. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.13802, PMID:
- 40.Pacek LR, Weinberger AH, Zhu J, Goodwin RD. Rapid increase in the prevalence of cannabis use among people with depression in the United States, 2005-17: the role of differentially changing risk perceptions. Addiction. (2020) 115:935–43. doi: 10.1111/ADD.14883, PMID:
- 41.Stevens AK, Gunn RL, Jackson KM, Borsari B, Metrik J. Examining motivational pathways from adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms to cannabis use: results from a prospective study of veterans. Psychol Addict Behav. (2021) 35:16–28. doi: 10.1037/ADB0000682, PMID:
- 42.Stueber A, Cuttler C. Self-reported effects of cannabis on ADHD symptoms, ADHD medication side effects, and ADHD-related executive dysfunction. J Atten Disord. (2022) 26:942–55. doi: 10.1177/10870547211050949, PMID:
- 43.Upadhyaya HP, Carpenter MJ. Is attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptom severity associated with tobacco use? Am J Addict. (2008) 17:195–8. doi: 10.1080/10550490802021937, PMID:
- 44.Soler Artigas M, Sánchez-Mora C, Rovira P, Richarte V, Garcia-Martínez I, Pagerols M, et al. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and lifetime cannabis use: genetic overlap and causality. Mol Psychiatry. (2020) 25:2493–503. doi: 10.1038/s41380-018-0339-3
- 45.Petker T, DeJesus J, Lee A, Gillard J, Owens MM, Balodis I, et al. Cannabis use, cognitive performance, and symptoms of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder in community adults. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. (2020) 28:638–48. doi: 10.1037/pha0000354, PMID:
- 46.Elser H, Humphreys K, Kiang MV, Mehta S, Yoon JH, Faustman WO, et al. State cannabis legalization and psychosis-related health care utilization. JAMA Netw Open. (2023) 6:e2252689–9. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.52689, PMID:
- 47.Feingold D, Weiser M, Rehm J, Lev-Ran S. The association between cannabis use and anxiety disorders: results from a population-based representative sample. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. (2016) 26:493–505. doi: 10.1016/J.EURONEURO.2015.12.037, PMID:
- 48.Caulkins JP, Pardo B, Kilmer B. Intensity of cannabis use: findings from three online surveys. Int J Drug Policy. (2020) 79:102740. doi: 10.1016/J.DRUGPO.2020.102740, PMID:
- 49.Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration . Key substance use and mental health indicators in the United States: Results from the 2020 National Survey on drug use and health (HHS publication no. PEP21-07-01-003, NSDUH series H-56). Rockville, MD: Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; (2021).
- 50.Prince MA, Conner BT, Pearson MR. Quantifying cannabis: a field study of marijuana quantity estimation. Psychol Addict Behav. (2018) 32:426–33. doi: 10.1037/adb0000370, PMID:
- 51.Tomko RL, Baker NL, McClure EA, Sonne SC, McRae-Clark AL, Sherman BJ, et al. Incremental validity of estimated cannabis grams as a predictor of problems and cannabinoid biomarkers: evidence from a clinical trial. Drug Alcohol Depend. (2018) 182:1–7. doi: 10.1016/J.DRUGALCDEP.2017.09.035, PMID:
- 52.Jeffers AM, Glantz S, Byers A, Keyhani S. Sociodemographic characteristics associated with and prevalence and frequency of cannabis use among adults in the US. JAMA Netw Open. (2021) 4:e2136571–1. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.36571, PMID:
- 53.Silins E, Fergusson DM, Patton GC, Horwood LJ, Olsson CA, Hutchinson DM, et al. Adolescent substance use and educational attainment: an integrative data analysis comparing cannabis and alcohol from three Australasian cohorts. Drug Alcohol Depend. (2015) 156:90–6. doi: 10.1016/J.DRUGALCDEP.2015.08.034, PMID:
- 54.Meier MH, Hill ML, Small PJ, Luthar SS. Associations of adolescent cannabis use with academic performance and mental health: a longitudinal study of upper middle class youth. Drug Alcohol Depend. (2015) 156:207–12. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.09.010, PMID:
- 55.Melchior M, Bolze C, Fombonne E, Surkan PJ, Pryor L, Jauffret-Roustide M. Early cannabis initiation and educational attainment: is the association causal? Data from the French TEMPO study. Int J Epidemiol. (2017) 46:1641–50. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyx065, PMID:
- 56.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development . (2023). Switzerland Overview of the education system (EAG 2023). gpseducation.oecd.org. Retrieved November 19, 2023, from https://gpseducation.oecd.org/CountryProfile?primaryCountry=CHE&treshold=10&topic=EO
- 57.Khantzian EJ. The self-medication hypothesis of substance use disorders: a reconsideration and recent applications. Harv Rev Psychiatry. (1997) 4:231–44. doi: 10.3109/10673229709030550, PMID:
- 58.Loflin M, Earleywine M, De Leo J, Hobkirk A. Subtypes of attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and cannabis use. Subst Use Misuse. (2014) 49:427–34. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2013.841251, PMID:
- 59.Sexton M, Cuttler C, Finnell JS, Mischley LK. A cross-sectional survey of medical Cannabis users: patterns of use and perceived efficacy. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. (2016) 1:131–8. doi: 10.1089/can.2016.0007, PMID:
- 60.Wilens TE. Impact of ADHD and its treatment on substance abuse in adults. J Clin Psychiatry. (2004) 65:38–45. PMID:
- 61.Fergusson DM, Boden JM, Horwood LJ. Cannabis use and other illicit drug use: testing the cannabis gateway hypothesis. Addiction. (2006) 101:556–69. doi: 10.1111/J.1360-0443.2005.01322.X, PMID:
- 62.Hawke LD, Koyama E, Henderson J. Cannabis use, other substance use, and co-occurring mental health concerns among youth presenting for substance use treatment services: sex and age differences. J Subst Abus Treat. (2018) 91:12–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2018.05.001, PMID:
- 63.Jones CM, McCance-Katz EF. Relationship between recency and frequency of youth cannabis use on other substance use. J Adolesc Health. (2019) 64:411–3. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.09.017, PMID:
- 64.Zaman T, Malowney M, Knight J, Boyd JW. Co-occurrence of substance-related and other mental health disorders among adolescent cannabis users. J Addict Med. (2015) 9:317–21. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000138, PMID:
- 65.Fergusson DM, Boden JM. Cannabis use and adult ADHD symptoms. Drug Alcohol Depend. (2008) 95:90–6. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.12.012, PMID:
Associated Data
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.