Heavy Metals in Cannabis Vapes and Their Health Implications—A Scoping Review
1Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
2Department of Periodontology, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
Abstract
Cannabis vaping involves the vaporization of cannabis vape (CV) liquid via a vape pen made of metallic and nonmetallic parts. Recently, various metal contaminants that originate from cannabis, as well as the vape liquid packaging device, were reported in CV liquids and aerosols. Heavy metal exposure from CVs is associated with various health afflictions and should be regulated. This scoping review intends to investigate the literature on heavy metal releases from CVs and their impact on health. This review was conducted according to the PRISMA-ScR scoping review guidelines. Initial search in electronic databases such as Medline (PubMed), Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science yielded nine studies published until February 2024. The metals released from CVs, the variables influencing their leaching, and any documented adverse health impacts were recorded. Findings revealed that the structural elements of the CVs leached metals such as nickel (Ni), chromium (Cr), lead (Pb), cobalt (Co), cadmium (Cd), and copper (Cu), which were transported into the aerosol as tiny particles. Several factors, including the structural integrity of the device components, device age, operating temperature, vape liquid pH, and viscosity cutting agents in the vape liquid, caused metal dissolution. Even though none of the studies evaluated the direct health impact of these metals, they proposed that they may affect multiple body organs, specifically the lungs, where they were associated with electronic vaping device use-associated lung injury (EVALI). These metals might expedite the transformation of vitamin E acetate into ketenes, which are associated with EVALI. We can conclude that heavy metals beyond the regulatory guidelines are released from CVs and have negative health consequences. Further research is required to improve the CV design elements to lower the metal leaching. Additionally, disclosing the CV packaging contents to consumers is essential to prevent possible health risks.
1. Introduction
The consumption of tobacco and cannabis constitutes significant public health concerns. Although the health hazards of toxicants from conventional cigarettes are well documented, there is scarce information about the health implications of the so-called safer alternatives to cigarettes, electronic cigarettes (ECs), or vapes. The ECs or vapes are very popular among youngsters in the United States between 18 and 24 years of age [1]. A wide range of cannabis products entered the markets when it was legalized in both Canada and the United States [2]. Traditionally, cannabis was used by burning the “flower/bud” of the plant, which was lit, smoked, and inhaled through a smoking device [3]. However, currently, vaping is the most common method of cannabis and nicotine consumption [4, 5]. In the United States, the percentage of college students exposed to cannabis vapes (CVs) in their lifetime ranged from 9% to 29%, while the same rate in high school students was between 5% and 9% [6–9].
Conventional cannabis vaporizers heat dried cannabis herb or the liquid cannabis extracts to high temperatures, leading to cannabinoid vaporization [10]. Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the active component of cannabis, is solubilized in an e-liquid formulation, including propylene glycol or vegetable glycerin, occasionally enhanced with flavorings [11]. Vaping cannabis liquid is a noncombustion method in which the concentrate is breathed through a mouthpiece after being aerosolized when it comes into contact with a resistance-heated element [12]. Due to the variation in device design and e-liquid composition, concerns remain over the toxicants present, the health hazards to the airways, and the physiological responses elicited in users. It is thought that EC aerosols have fewer toxic compounds than regular tobacco and, possibly, marijuana cigarettes [13]. It is challenging to research the differences in their emission products because the use of cannabis and nicotine ECs differs from that of tobacco cigarettes. In addition to psychotropic compounds like nicotine and cannabinoids (primarily THC and CBD), the aerosols released from vaping products also contain respiratory toxicants such as formaldehyde, acrolein, and benzaldehyde [14].
The vape liquid and aerosol of nicotine ECs were shown to have higher levels of harmful metals such as nickel (Ni), chromium (Cr), and lead (Pb) [15]. Because of corrosion or surface cracking, metallic parts of vaping devices can leach Pb, Ni, copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), tin (Sn), aluminum (Al), and Cr into the vape liquid [16]. The aerosol and vape liquid in the cartridge tank contained more metals than the vape liquid in the dispenser, indicating that they migrated from the coil [17]. Owing to their small nanoparticle size (< 100 nm), these metals can be easily inhaled by the consumers from the aerosol [16]. Besides the device component, the Cannabis sativa plant can be a metal source as it is a hyperaccumulator of metals which quickly absorbs them from the contaminated soil [18]. Its leaves, roots, and stems have high concentrations of Cu, cadmium (Cd), Ni, and Cr [18, 19]. These naturally accumulated metals in cannabis may not entirely be removed through extraction and may be present in the final products derived from the plant [20]. Although heavy metals were detected in tobacco and cannabis under various smoking conditions, very few investigations report their presence in the CVs [12, 21]. Like the nicotine ECs, the heavy metals might leak from the structural elements of CVs into the concentrate depending on the temperature, oil acidity, frequency, and duration of usage [22]. Simultaneous use of CVs and nicotine may result in prolonged exposure to dangerous metals, which may be detrimental to the adult's and child's health [23].
Even though many chemical components of vaping, nicotine, and cannabinoids are similar, some are distinct and significant when considering the respiratory consequences of vaping both substances [24]. For instance, cannabinoids are lipophilic, so solvents used in CV liquids differ from nicotine ECs [25]. Aerosols of nicotine and CVs also contain hydrophobic chemicals such as vitamin E acetate (VEA), which were found in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and were associated with increased risk of electronic cigarette or vaping device use-associated lung injury (EVALI) [23, 26].
Evidence suggests that the body reacts to vape aerosol similar to that of cigarette smoke [27]. Just like cigarette smoke, exposure to e-liquid caused similar degrees of cellular damage and morbidity in cultures of human skin and lung cells [28]. In a mouse model, vape liquid increased the synthesis of various proinflammatory cytokines. Its effects on lung function were comparable to cigarette smoke [29]. Studies on animal inhalation and in vitro cytotoxicity also demonstrated more oxidative stress, lung damage, and inflammatory alterations upon vape aerosol inhalation than nicotine [30]. It caused a stronger inflammatory response and pathological alterations linked to lung damage. Lastly, heavy metals like Pb in CV liquids, although lower than those in cigarette smoke, may produce adverse health effects [31].
Unlike the nicotine ECs, CV aerosols lack a thorough characterization of hazardous metals [21]. Considering increased cannabis vaping among teenagers and young adults, it is critical to analyze these potentially hazardous materials, like toxic metals in CVs, their concentrates, and aerosols, which may negatively impact multiple body organs, including the lungs [23]. Given the above, this scoping review was aimed at comprehensively exploring and mapping the literature on the heavy metals released from CVs and their health implications.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Research Question
The specific research question was as follows: what are the heavy metals released from CVs, and what are their health impacts? This specific research question would enable the exploration of harmful metals released from CVs, factors that affect their release, and their harmful effects on the health of youngsters and adults using them.
2.2. Inclusion Criteria
This scoping review included all study designs assessing heavy metals released from CVs and their adverse health implications. The inclusion criteria were full texts of all original peer-reviewed studies until February 20, 2024, about the occurrence of heavy metals in CVs and their potential health effects.
2.3. Exclusion Criteria
Any reviews, abstracts, conference proceedings, letters, commentaries, opinions, and book chapters were excluded. Additionally, articles published in languages other than English were excluded.
2.4. Search Strategy
The research publications pertaining to the occurrence of heavy metals in CVs and their potential health effects were sought out through a search of various online databases, such as Medline (PubMed), Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science. Specific search methods were developed for every database. All fields were searched using a combination of keywords such as “Cannabis” AND “Vaporizer” OR “Electronic Cigarette” OR “Vaping” OR “ENDS” OR “Vape” AND “metals.” There were no year limits. The research selection was strictly based on the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-scR), as shown in the flow diagram [32] (Figure 1).
2.5. Study Selection
The titles and abstracts of the studies were initially reviewed independently by the two reviewers, followed by a thorough evaluation of the full texts. Any disagreements about study inclusion were resolved through discussions.
2.6. Data Extraction
A standardized form was used by the two researchers to extract the data independently. Any conflicts were resolved through discussions. The following information was extracted: the last name of the first author, the year the study was published, the component of the CV that was analyzed, the metal released, the method used for its detection, the metal concentration, the factor causing its release, and any possible health implications that were mentioned.
2.7. Search Results
Out of the 80 papers found by the electronic search (17 in PubMed, 30 in Embase, 18 in Scopus, and 15 in Web of Science), 51 were present after eliminating duplicates. Following a review of the abstracts and titles by two reviewers, 40 papers were excluded, as they were irrelevant. Lastly, the entire texts of nine original experimental studies were included in the review [12, 21–23, 26, 33–36].
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Type of CVs and Their Components Evaluated
The included studies tested commercial, model, and counterfeit CVs to evaluate the presence of metals in CV liquids, aerosols, and structural components. Aerosols produced by the glass tank cannabis delivery system, which mainly used pod-type devices, were examined [22, 23]. It included a 1-g glass tank (MG210, Mr. Green Supply) and a “model” system cartridge with a “510 thread” style [22]. A commercial, nonportable tabletop vaporizer, Volcano Digit, was also assessed [36]. Additionally, a few studies used nicotine and CV cartridges that were taken from EVALI patients [35]. They examined the amount of metal in CV liquids that were either legal or counterfeit [12, 26]. To create aerosols, the oil, flower, and cannabis concentrate were utilized [21, 22]. The metals released from aerosols of CVs and nicotine ECs and their structural components were compared. A study also assessed botanical raw materials (BRMs), which are the ground plant parts (leaves and stems) that are smoked as unfiltered cannabis cigarettes, except the main stem [36]. Additionally, commercially available cartridges with ceramic, plastic, or metallic mouthpieces were examined [22, 35].
3.2. Method of Aerosol Generation and Collection
CV aerosol was produced in the experiments with the help of the CETI-8 EC vape [23]. It was collected in a tubing system attached to the vaping machine syringe pump at one end and the mouthpiece of the CVs at the other [23]. In two trials, the CORESTA aerosol collection method with 81 parameters was applied (3 s 55 mL puff every 30 s with a rectangular puff profile) [21, 23]. Aerosol was produced for every sample ranging from 15 [23] to 50 puffs [21, 22], with an approximate 87% recovery in the condensation tubing. One study used a smoke machine configured to a square puff profile with 3 s puffs and 42 s rest between each puff for aerosol generation and collection [22]. In the cannabis flower combustion studies, 200 mg of cannabis flower was ignited in a glass apparatus. With a constant flow rate of 12 mL/s, the combustion smoke and dab aerosols were pulled through the impinger, and the aerosol collected was analyzed for metals after rinsing with acetone [22].
3.3. Method Used for Trace Metal Detection in CV E-Liquids
For metals analysis, 0.2–1.0 g of cannabis e-liquid from CVs used by individuals experiencing acute respiratory symptoms associated with EVALI was extracted [33]. As they flow freely at 110°C–120°C, the samples were heated in a microcentrifuge tube to a maximum of 120°C and stirred for 30–60 min before analysis [33]. The studies used inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS), ICP-MS, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) with energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS), and portable x-ray fluorescence (XRF) for metal detection. Among these techniques, the ICP-MS was most frequently applied for detecting metals in CV-liquids. It was preferred as it could detect a wide range of metals, including heavy metals, which are of particular concern in CV liquids. Moreover, its high sensitivity and ability to quantify the metals increased its acceptability as an effective method for trace metal detection in CV liquids [37]. The metal particle size varied from hundreds to tens of nanometers [12].
4. Strengths and Limitations
This review included studies to date focusing on heavy metals released from CVs, and it was observed that metals beyond the regulatory guidelines were released from them. However, these results cannot be generalized to all the CVs, as the studies were primarily experimental. Various research gaps were identified in the present review, including a lack of specific assessment of the harmful health effects of heavy metals produced from CVs in humans. Furthermore, a standard CV cartridge design and device characteristics like voltage settings, temperature, puffing profile, e-liquid composition, and flavorings were lacking in the studies, which caused the results to be noncomparable. As the federal government declared cannabis as illegal and only recently cartridges with CV liquids were legalized, there is scarce information on metal exposure, specifically from the nonpolar cannabis aerosols and their health implications. Future studies incorporating a standard exposure system for assessing the toxic dosage of heavy metals, the biomarkers affected, health effects through animal models and humans, and health implications of second-hand exposure are needed.
5. Conclusion
Metals like Pb, Co, Cr, Ni, and Cu are released from the structural components of CVs when operated at high temperatures. Factors like device age and storage, vape liquid composition and pH, operating temperature, and design characteristics of CVs influence metal dissolution. Heavy metal exposure from CVs may adversely affect various organ systems and produce respiratory, neurological, cardiovascular, and renal side effects. Owing to the increased popularity of the CVs among the young population, increased awareness of their harmful effects is imperative. Regulatory guidelines are needed to prevent CV liquid contamination from accessories or packaging. Furthermore, testing of metals beyond the “Big 4” should be advocated. Future research is warranted into the adverse health implications of heavy metals released from CVs through animal and human studies.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Funding
No funding was received for this manuscript.
| Author | Aims and objectives | Component of CV evaluated for metal detection | Metals in cannabis vape liquids | Metals in aerosol | Metals in CV components | Method for metal detection | Results and conclusion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Muthumalage et al. [26] | Identified chemical constituents of counterfeit ECs and them to medical grade and CV cartridges | Vape liquid | Counterfeit cartridges: Cu, Ni, Pb, and Si (> 600 ppm) | — | — | ICP-MS | • Respiratory toxicants present in liquid and vapor phases of patient CVs and counterfeit cartridges not found in medical-grade CVs. • Inhaled hydrocarbons, oils, hazardous chemicals, and metals can result in lipoid pneumonia, which may trigger EVALI. |
| Wagner et al. [35] | Evaluated the internal components and make-up of the CVs related to 2019 EVALI patients and contrasted them with nicotine ECs from 2016 to 2019. Examined the components of polymers, metals, and ceramics subjected to heat in particular | CV device components | Ni, Cr, Cu, Pb, Sn, Au, and Si | — | Wire: Ni, Fe, Cr, Co, and S Battery contacts: Ni and Co Mouthpiece: Fe, Cr, and Ni | X-ray fluorescence SEM Fourier-transform infrared microspectroscopy | • CVs from EVALI patients had broken wire and burned ceramic heating components due to high temperatures. • More ceramic and polymer insulation in CV cartridges resulting in higher temperatures. • Combination of high temperatures, metals, and ceramics in CVs promotes VEA degradation to ketenes. • Optimum temperature settings may prevent decomposition of fluorinated microplastics and rubbers rich in Ni, Cr, Cu, Pb, Sn, Au, and Si, and detrimental effects might be mitigated. |
| Gonzalez-Jimenez et al. [23] | Created a method for analyzing the hydrophobic and hydrophilic aerosols of ECs for metals such as Al, Cr, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Cd, Sn, Ba, and Pb | Aerosol CV device components | — | Cu = 16.1 ng/10 puffs | Battery contacts: Ni, Cr, and Co | Triple quadrupole ICP-MS | • CV aerosols had metals but below the detection limit except for Cu. • Nicotine ECs showed presence of Pb and Sn. |
| Kubachka and Wilson [33] | Conducted elemental analysis of 65 EVALI-related cartridges | Vape liquid | Pb = 11.1 μg/g Ni = 477 μg/g Cu = 150 μg/g Zn = 120 μg/g Sn = 1.12 μg/g Cr = 3.89 μg/g Mn = 0.495 μg/g Cd = 0.033 μg/g Co = 0.968 μg/g Au = 0.93 μg/g | — | — | ICP-MS | • Metals are present in CV vape liquids. |
| Mallampati et al. [21] | Developed method for analysis of metals in CV aerosols from CV vape liquid and flower combustion | Vape liquid Aerosol Flower combustion | Before vaping: As = 7.33 μg/g Cd = 7.57 μg/g Co = 7.99 μg/g Cr = 8.02 μg/g Cu = 8.35 μg/g Hg = 3.44 μg/g Mn = 8.42 μg/g Ni = 8.01 μg/g Pb = 8.62 μg/g Sn = 9.85 μg/g After vaping: Increased concentration of As, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Hg, Mn, Ni, Pb, and Sn | Aerosol: As > Hg > Ni > Sn > Cu > Cr Flower combustion: As > Cd > Ni > Pb > Sn > Cu > Hg > Mn > Co > Pb | — | ICP-MS | • Following vaping, elevated concentrations of some metals in the concentrate suggest that the devices could be potential metal sources. |
| McDaniel et al. [22] | Analyzed CV components and aerosols for metals | Vape liquid Aerosol CV device components | Commercial cartridges Before vaping: Cr = 1.5 μg/g Cu = 6.4 μg/g Ni = 6.2 μg/g Mn = 0.82 μg/g Trace levels of big four metals: As (2.0 μg/g), Cd (0.8 μg/g), Hg (0.4 μg/g), and Pb (1.2 μg/g) After vaping: Increased levels of Cr, Cu, Ni, and Mn Model cartridges: Before heating: Cr = 0.15 μg/g Cu = 0.32 μg/g Hg = 0.25 μg/g Mn = 0.53 μg/g Ni = 0.089 μg/g 3 weeks (25°C) Cu = 2.9 μg/g Hg = 0.33 μg/g Mn = 0.63 μg/g Ni = 0.27 μg/g 7 months (25°C) Co = 0.12 μg/g Cr = 1.3 μg/g Cu = 88 μg/g Mn = 0.70 μg/g Ni = 41 μg/g Pb = 0.37 μg/g Sn = 0.6 μg/g 3 weeks (42°C) Cu = 0.39 μg/g Hg = 0.93 μg/g Mn = 0.43 μg/g Ni = 0.15 μg/g 7 months (42°C) Cd = 0.036 μg/g Cr = 1.5 μg/g Cu = 280 μg/g Mn = 0.84 μg/g Ni = 64 μg/g Pb = 13 μg/g Sn = 4.4 μg/g | Aerosol: In all groups: Cu, Ni, and Mn Terpenated oils (Cu = 0.04 mg/m3; Cr = 0.02 mg/m3; Ni = 0.05 mg/m3; Mn = 0.01 mg/m3) Unterpenated (Cu = 0.07 mg/m3; Cr = 0.12 mg/m3; Ni = 0.25 mg/m3; Mn = 0.02 mg/m3) | Heating coil and metal core: Ni, Cr, Cu, and Pb Mouthpiece–commercial cartridges: Cu, Mn, Ni, Pb, and Sn Model cartridges: Cr and Ni | ICP-MS | • Metals migrate into the cannabis oil and inhaled vapors and may result in greater inhalation of metals above the regulatory standards. • Direct combustion of cannabis flower and concentrate also show presence of metals. • Other metals than the normal As, Cd, Hg, and Pb should be included in the list of controlled metals because heated devices are a source of metal contamination. |
| Meehan-Atrash and Rahman [34] | Analyzed components of branded CVs | CV device components | Mg, Cr, Ni, Cu, Zn, Hg, and Pb | — | — | ICP-MS | • Inaccurate labeling Δ8-THC, cutting agents, and reaction products. • Heavy metals leached out of vaporizer components produce adverse health effects. |
| Gajdosechova et al. [12] | Investigated 12 different metal kinds in 20 legitimate and 21 illicit cannabis vape liquids | Vape liquid | Illegal samples: Pb = 50 μg/g Ni = 677 μg/g Zn = 426 μg/g Legal samples: Cu = 485 μg/g Other metals: Co, Cr, Mn, V, and Na | — | — | SEM Laser ablation ICP-MS | • The metal percentage of legal cannabis vape liquids varied among vape liquids made from the same cannabis lot. • Metal particles found in the vape liquid of unused cannabis devices. |
| Wang et al. [36] | Examined how, during the vaporization process, metallic components from cannabis material were transported to cannabis vapor | Cannabis plant material | — | Mg, Al, Zn, Ba, Cu, Ni, Cr, V, Pb, Co, Mo, Li, As, Cd, Sb, and Hg | — | ICP-MS | • Mg, Al, Zn, Ba, Cu, Ni, Cr, V, Pb, Co, Mo, Li, As, Cd, Sb, and Hg in all types of cannabis material. • Mg present in highest concentration. • No elemental contaminants moved from the raw material into the vapors during the vaporization process, since the metallic elements persisted in the samples even after varying heat treatments (no heat, 30 s heat, 70 s heat, and 70 s heat with air). • Elemental contaminants are found in the cannabis vapors when the material is heated to a significantly higher temperature for a long time. |