Hepatocyte cannabinoid 1 receptor nullification alleviates toxin-induced liver damage via NF-κB signaling
Laboratory of Clinical Investigation, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD USA
Department of Nutritional Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK USA
Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Immunology, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD USA
Laboratory of Genetics and Genomics, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD USA
Abstract
Cannabinoid 1 receptor (CB1R) expression is upregulated in the liver with viral hepatitis, cirrhosis, and both alcoholic and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (FLD), whereas its expression is muted under usual physiological conditions. Inhibiting CB1R has been shown to be beneficial in preserving hepatic function in FLD but it is unclear if inhibiting CB1R during an inflammatory response to an acute hepatic injury, such as toxin-induced injury, would also be beneficial. We found that intrinsic CB1R in hepatocytes regulated liver inflammation-related gene transcription. We tested if nullification of hepatocyte-specific CB1R (hCNR1−/−) in mice protects against concanavalin A (Con A)-induced liver injury. We looked for evidence of liver damage and markers of inflammation in response to Con A by measuring liver enzyme levels and proinflammatory cytokines (e.g., TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-17) in serum collected from hCNR1−/− and control mice. We observed a shift to the right in the dose-response curve for liver injury and inflammation in hCNR1−/− mice. We also found less inflammatory cell infiltration and focal necrosis in livers of hCNR1−/− mice compared to controls, resulting from downregulated apoptotic markers. This anti-apoptotic mechanism results from increased activation of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB), especially cAMP-dependent cannabinoid signaling and membrane-bound TNF-α, via downregulated TNF-α receptor 2 (TNFR2) transcription levels. Collectively, these findings provide insight into involvement of CB1R in the pathogenesis of acute liver injury.
Untitled section
Subject terms: Autoimmune hepatitis, Acute inflammation
Article notes
Untitled section
Received 2020 Jul 3; Revised 2020 Nov 18; Accepted 2020 Nov 19; Collection date 2020 Dec.
Introduction
Inflammatory liver diseases, an increasing health problem worldwide, are caused by diverse agents such as toxins, viruses, various drugs and alcohol ingestion, fatty liver disease (FLD), and immune dysfunction1. The first insult leads to hepatocyte injury that is reflected in increased circulating levels of liver enzymes, and, if left unchecked, progressive liver inflammation, hepatocyte apoptosis, necrosis, and fibrosis ultimately results in cirrhosis and liver failure. Concanavalin A (Con A), a Canavalia extract and a plant lectin (carbohydrate-binding protein), has direct hepatotoxic effects2. Injecting mice with Con A lead to acute liver injury and the resultant appearance of increased levels of liver enzymes in the circulation as early as 12 h post injection. Liver infiltration with inflammatory lymphocytes, primarily natural killer T (NKT) cells and CD4+ lymphocytes occurs, triggering the secretion of several cytokines, chemokines, and inflammatory mediators3,4.
The endocannabinoid system (ECS) consists of two ligands, anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG), both of which are lipid mediators, and two endocannabinoid (EC) receptors, cannabinoid 1 (CB1R) and cannabinoid 2 (CB2R): both receptor types are Gi-protein coupled (GPCRs). The central nervous system (CNS) has the highest expression of CB1R but it is also present in peripheral organs, whereas CB2R is predominantly expressed in immune cells5,6. While the expression levels of EC receptors are low in the liver under normal physiological conditions, marked increases in their levels occur upon injury and disease7,8. Functional studies indicate opposing effects of CB1R and CB2R in the liver. For example, chronic CB1R activation can result in pro-fibrogenic changes, whereas CB2R activation is anti-fibrogenic7,9. Hepatic CB1R, when activated, is reported to play a major detrimental role in the pathogenesis of alcoholic and non-alcoholic FLD10. Therefore, pharmacological or genetic inhibition of CB1R, but not CB2R, has been proposed to be a therapeutic strategy to treat liver pathology due to alcohol- and high fat diet-induced FLD11.
We, and others, have reported the presence and outlined some physiological actions of CB1R in murine and human hepatocytes, as well as in beta cells in islets of Langerhans12,13. A CB1R antagonist, SR141716A, was found to be hepatoprotective with respect to Con A injury14, while, in contrast, exogenous and endogenous cannabinoids have been shown to attenuate experimental autoimmune hepatitis15. To definitively investigate the involvement of hepatic CB1 receptors in toxin-induced liver damage, we used hepatocyte-specific CB1R-null mice (hCNR1−/−) and studied their response to a Con A insult. Our findings show that lack of CB1R exerts a hepatoprotective effect and raises the possibility of using CB1R-specific antagonists or inverse agonists to mitigate against hepatitis during acute toxin injury. We have already reported that human hepatocytes and β-cells contain a specific isoform of CB1R13, thus adding a potential for liver specificity of CB1R antagonistic actions in humans.
Results
Hepatic Cnr1 gene regulates innate liver damage-related gene profiles
To investigate the effect of hepatic CB1R on liver damage, we generated hepatocyte-specific Cnr1 gene knockout mice (Fig. 1A). We profiled global mRNA expression of isolated hepatocytes (devoid of inflammatory cells) from hCNR1+/+ and hCNR1−/− mice. Comparison of CB1R null vs. control hepatocyte transcriptomes showed 1423 downregulated and 72 upregulated genes (fold-change >2, p < 0.05) (Fig. 1B). We employed analysis of Gene Ontology (GO) based on differentially expressed genes. As expected, we found Cnr1 gene was highly involved in liver hepatitis and inflammation in hepatocytes (Fig. 1C, D). In hCNR1−/− hepatocytes, 63 out of 95 genes involved in inflammation were downregulated. Further, of 231 genes whose alterations have been implicated in multiple liver diseases such as hepatitis, FLDs, and polycystic liver diseases, 132 genes (57%) were downregulated in hCNR−/− mice (Fig. 1D, E). Also, the genes controlled by inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin 1 receptor 1 (Il1r1), interleukin 1β (Il1b), interleukin 6 (Il6), and tumor necrosis factor (Tnf) were substantially downregulated (Fig. 1F). Collectively, ablation of Cnr1 gene in hepatocytes is characterized by reduced inflammatory and liver injury-associated genes in the resting state, suggesting a role for CB1R, not only under duress, but also under steady-state conditions.
Deletion of hepatocyte CB1R ameliorates liver damage via anti-apoptotic signaling
To understand if hepatic CB1R has any role during liver injury, we injected hCNR1+/+ and hCNR1−/− mice with PBS or Con A. Con A induced an obvious increase of hepatic Cnr1 mRNA expression levels in the hCNR1+/+ mice (Fig. 2a). On the other hand, Cnr2 mRNA expression levels were not different between the two groups under basal conditions, or with Con A treatment (Fig. S1A, B). In accordance with the in vivo data, freshly isolated hepatocytes from hCNR−/− mice were significantly less sensitive to Con A treatment compared to WT hepatocytes (IC50: 133.8 + 7.6 vs. 67.75 + 2.5 µg/mL, respectively; Fig. S2A), indicating their inherent resistance of hepatocytes to Con A treatment.
Next, we determined the effective duration and concentration of intravenous Con A for induction of hepatitis in hCNR1+/+ and hCNR1−/− mice (Fig. S2B, C). Con A (5 mg/kg) induced liver injury in hCNR1+/+ mice, based on serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, as early as 3 h after administration with maximum effect at 12 h. In contrast, ALT levels in hCNR1−/− mice were normal until 12 h post administration, then there was a slight elevation that had returned to normal by 24 h (Fig. 2B and S2B). Histological analysis of liver confirmed that hCNR1−/− mice had less inflammatory cell infiltration and liver necrosis (Fig. 2C–E). Notably, scattered focal necrosis was significantly less in hCNR1−/− compared to hCNR1+/+ mice (Fig. 2C, E). To investigate whether necrosis was the result of apoptosis, we checked the liver tissue lysates post-injection of Con A (5 mg/kg) for 12 h for apoptosis markers. The levels of cleaved caspase 3, the active form of caspase 3, were significantly higher in hCNR1+/+ mice compared to hCNR1−/− mice (Fig. 2F, G). Furthermore, the levels of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), a downstream substrate of caspase 3, was also markedly higher in hCNR1+/+ mice (Fig. 2F, H). In contrast, Bcl-2, an anti-apoptotic protein in the intrinsic pathway, was increased in hCNR1−/− compared to hCNR1+/+ mice (Fig. 2F), strongly supporting the notion that the deficiency of hepatic CB1R protects against programmed cell death caused by an extrinsic causative factor such as Con A.
Con A-induced inflammation was suppressed in hCNR1−/− mice
Con A-induced liver injury is accompanied by increasing serum levels of proinflammatory cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1β, IL-17, interferon γ (IFN-γ), and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) that lead to induction of hepatic apoptosis2. We therefore measured serum levels of these cytokines in Con A-treated mice and we found that all cytokines except for IFN-γ were significantly lower in hCNR1−/− mice (Fig. 3A). The transcription factor nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) protects against cytokine-induced apoptosis16. Mice lacking p65 subunit of NF-κB suffer from mid-embryonic lethality due to massive liver apoptosis involving TNF-α, suggesting a pivotal role for p65 in protection against TNF-α-induced apoptosis17. Thus, we sought to determine the phosphorylation status of the NF-κB p65 subunit since phosphorylation of p65 results in an increase in its transcriptional activity18. We found that the levels of phosphorylated p65 were indeed increased in livers of hCNR1−/− mice after Con A injection along with increased total p65 levels, compared to Con A-injected hCNR1+/+ mice (Fig. 3B). To confirm this result, we fractionated proteins from cytoplasmic and nuclear cellular compartments, then detected expression levels of phosphorylated and total p65. In keeping with the results from whole lysates, livers from hCNR1−/− mice had significantly higher expression of both phospho- and total p65 in both compartments (Fig. 3C). The kinase responsible for the phosphorylation of p65 is the inhibitor of κB kinase (IKK) β18 and we found that the expression levels of IKKβ were significantly upregulated in hCNR1−/− mice (Fig. 3B). IKKβ-deficient hepatocytes are sensitive to Con A-induced liver damage through TNF-α signaling19 and mice lacking IKKβ displayed embryonic lethality in mid-gestation20, which is identical to the phenotype of p65-deficient mice. Taken together, these data suggest that lack of CB1R is conducive to activation of NF-κB in the liver, which drives anti-apoptotic signaling and consequently protects liver damage because of Con A administration.
Ablation of hepatic CB1R protects liver damage via cAMP-dependent pathway
CB1R activation is well-documented by us and others to suppress adenylyl cyclase (AC) activity, resulting in reduced intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) levels and downstream protein kinase A (PKA) activation21,22. To confirm this cellular signal transduction in hepatocytes we analyzed their gene profiles (Fig. 1B). Ninety-four out of 139 genes downstream from EC signaling were downregulated, including the notable adenylate cyclase 4 and 7 (Adcy4 and Adcy7) in hCNR1+/+ compared to hCNR1−/− mice (Fig. 4A, B).
Thus, we further investigated whether cAMP is involved in the anti-apoptotic signaling pathway observed in hCNR1−/− mice during Con A-induced liver injury. We first evaluated levels of cAMP in the liver of Con A-treated hCNR1+/+ and hCNR1−/− mice: hCNR1−/− mice had increased levels compared to hCNR1+/+ mice (Fig. 4C). To elaborate on this finding, we analyzed the protein expression levels of AC and phospho-PKA in liver homogenates. In concurrence with the elevated levels of cAMP, the ratio of phosphorylated PKA and total PKA in hCNR1−/− was significantly higher than in hCNR1+/+ mice (Fig. 4D). The expression levels of AC were also significantly higher in hCNR1−/− mice (Fig. 4D). Therefore, we further explored the cAMP signaling and intrinsic apoptotic pathways. CB1R activation and Con A-induced liver injury commonly involve the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway23. Among nodes in MAPK signaling cascades, CB1R signaling leads to activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK 1/2) and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), both of which are inhibited by cAMP24,25. In contrast to ERK 1/2 phosphorylation, where no difference was observed between the two groups (Fig. S3), phosphorylation of JNK was significantly less in hCNR1−/− compared to hCNR1+/+ mice (Fig. 4D).
Role of membrane-bound TNF-α in Con A-induced liver damage
It has been established that membrane-bound TNF-α, expressed on NKT cells, plays a critical role in Con A-induced liver damage26,27. While circulating levels of TNF-α are indeed markedly lower in hCNR1−/− mice compared to hCNR1+/+ mice after Con A injection (Fig. 3A), it is the membrane-bound TNF-α interacting with the TNF receptor 2 (TNFR2) that leads to apoptosis19. We found that some infiltrating CD3-positive cells were positive for TNF-α as well, and these double-positive populations were drastically reduced in hCNR1−/− mice (Fig. 5A–C) while gene expression of TNFR2, but not TNFR1, was lower in livers from hCNR1−/− compared to hCNR1+/+ mice (Fig. 5D). These data indicate that hCNR1−/− mice are resistant to Con A-induced liver damage by cell-anchored TNF-α as a ligand of TNFR2.
Both hepatocyte-specific deletion and pharmacological inhibition of CB1R ameliorate Con A-induced hepatocyte injury
The above findings indicate that deletion of CB1R in liver plays a protective role in liver damage by application of Con A. To confirm whether this protection is affected by peripheral CB1R antagonism without compensatory mechanisms in response to Cnr1 gene knockout, we injected JD-5037 (3 mg/kg), a pharmacologic inverse agonist of peripheral CB1R28, to mice prior to Con A (5 mg/kg). Consistent with the results in hCNR1−/− mice, JD-5037 protected against liver injury as demonstrated by normal ALT levels in circulation (Fig. 6A). Although we demonstrated that hepatocyte-specific deletion of CB1R in mice protects against liver damage caused by TNF-α after Con A injection and a CB1R antagonist also protects against liver injury, we cannot rule out the possibility that hepatocytes may have been influenced by paracrine signaling from neighboring non-parenchymal cells, such as the liver-resident macrophages and Kupffer cells (KCs). In fact, it has recently been reported that knockdown of CB1R in KCs promotes an anti-inflammatory profile including a lower TNF-α expression29. Thus, we isolated hepatocytes to investigate the effect of the genetically or pharmacologically CB1R-nullified hepatocytes alone on acute liver damage. We injected both hCNR1+/+ and hCNR1−/− mice with Con A (5 mg/kg), and 6 h later we isolated hepatocytes and cultured them overnight. In concordance with the in vivo data, the levels of phospho-p65 were significantly higher in isolated hepatocytes from hCNR1−/−mice compared to the wild-type counterpart, confirming the anti-apoptotic role of NF-κB p65 subunit (Fig. 6B). IKKβ is required for NF-kB activation and suppression of TNF-α-mediated liver apoptosis. The levels of IKKβ were increased in hepatocytes from hCNR1−/−mice compared to wild-type hepatocytes, explaining the increased levels of phospho-p65 (Fig. 6B), in keeping with the whole liver findings described above. Moreover, hepatocytes from hCNR1−/−mice had significantly less damage, as shown by the ALT levels in the medium, compared to those from hCNR1+/+ mice (Fig. 6C). We further examined if pharmacological inhibition of CB1R would result in similar protection from Con A. To study the effect of pharmacological CB1R inhibitor in acute liver damage, we isolated hepatocytes from C57Bl/6J mice and treated them with JD-5037 (100 nM). Four hours later, Con A (50 μg/mL) was added to the hepatocytes which were then incubated overnight. JD-5037 significantly suppressed JNK activation levels and there was a higher p-p65/p65 ratio and increased total IKKβ similar to what was observed in CB1R-deleted animal models (Fig. 6D). Additionally, we injected wild-type mice with JD-5037 (3 mg/kg). One hour later, we administered Con A (5 mg/kg) via the tail vein, and 6 h later we again isolated primary hepatocytes from the injected mice. Consistent with in vivo results from liver samples, we found that Con A treatment led to activation of caspase 3 in hepatocytes from hCNR1+/+ mice, whereas antagonism of CB1 receptor clearly protected against Con A-induced programed cell death (Fig. 6E). To evaluate a potential role of hepatic CB1R in amelioration of liver damage, we gave Con A (5 mg/kg) via intravenous injection to wild-type animals, and then isolated hepatocytes from liver-damaged mice after 6 h. Hepatocytes were incubated overnight and treated with either vehicle (DMSO) or JD-5037 (10 nM) for 1 h. We found that phosphorylated p65 protein expression levels were increased and there was less expression of active caspase 3 in CB1R antagonist-treated hepatocytes compared to controls (Fig. 6F).
Discussion
Over the last two decades, the ECS has emerged as a player involved in diverse causes of liver inflammation8,30. Although two studies have reported that exogenous and endogenous cannabinoids attenuate autoimmune hepatitis, in contrast to our results15,31, the beneficial effects were upon simultaneous engagement of both CB1 and CB2 receptors. A role for CB2R on immune cells has been widely reported and it therefore has potential to play a role in Con A-induced immunological disorder, whereas CB1R is not expressed on immune cells. In the present study, we measured CB2R (Cnr2) gene expression levels in livers from hCNR1+/+ and hCNR1−/− mice under both untreated and Con A-treated conditions. Although genetic compensation in response to gene knockout is a widespread phenomenon, we observed that lack of hepatic CB1R did not result in transcriptional genetic compensation of CB2R in either uncompromised or Con A-treated livers. We did not measure tissue levels of ECs such as 2-AG and anandamide in this study, one possibility is that hepatic injury and disease conditions such as hepatocellular carcinoma in humans32 and liver cirrhosis in rats33 lead to increased amounts of intra-hepatic ECs that then were permissive to hepatocyte damage in the presence of a toxin such as Con A. CB1R is constitutively active in hCNR1+/+ mice. However, tissue-specific genetic ablation and peripheral blockade of CB1R would have suppressed its activity34. Future experiments are required to more fully understand the CB1 receptor-mediated upstream events in acute liver disease.
Our studies highlight a role for CB1R in toxin-induced liver damage. To understand the broader role of Cnr1 gene, we performed microarray analyses using hepatocytes from hCNR1+/+ and hCNR1−/− mice. GO analysis based on differentially expressed genes revealed greater involvement of Cnr1 gene in liver inflammation and hepatitis. We then analyzed these expression profiles to search for networks and pathways, which might explain the seemingly negative effects of CB1R on proinflammatory cytokines and hepatic apoptosis. Although we mainly focused on cAMP-associated adcy genes downstream from EC signaling, we additionally noted downregulation of Ndufa4l2 and Pik3cd gene expression involved in liver inflammation. NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) 1 alpha subcomplex 4-like 2 (NDUFA4L2) affects cell viability and mitochondrial dysfunction and is known to be downregulated in CB1R-deleted podocytes35. Also, phosphoinositide 3-kinase delta (PI3Kδ, Pik3cd gene) regulates B and T cells36, which is coupled to CB1R in CHO cells37. Further study is needed to examine for any roles of such potential genes in liver inflammation.
Con A injection causes a cytokine storm accompanied by antigen-independent T cell activation, resulting in the death of hepatocytes3. Here, we demonstrate that lack of CB1R in hepatocytes alone led to a marked decrease in proinflammatory cytokine levels. However, we cannot rule out the possibility that other immune cells such as KCs, hepatic resident macrophage, and inflammatory cells including infiltrating macrophages, T lymphocytes, neutrophils, and dendritic cells contribute to liver inflammation38. It has been recently reported that CB1R directly affects inflammation in KCs and hepatic stellate cells (HSCs)29,39. In our study, less proinflammatory cytokines account for less tissue damage as evidenced by reduced cleaved caspase 3 and cleaved PARP, and increased levels of Bcl-2. This anti-apoptotic effect results from either activation of NF-κB or suppression of JNK activation or more likely both, since JNK involvement is known to occur in Con A-induced liver damage19. With regards to the inhibition of JNK activation, this is likely due to elevated cAMP levels through cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB)-mediated downstream molecules such as cellular FLICE-inhibitory protein (c-FLIP) and mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatase-1 (MKP-1) that inhibit JNK activation40 (Fig. 7).
Additional evidence that increased cAMP levels due to deletion or antagonism of CB1R contribute to alleviation of liver damage comes from the previous studies in which pharmacologic or genetic blockade of CB1R activates glucagon-like pepetide-1 receptor (GLP-1R), resulting in elevated cAMP levels41–43. More interestingly, a GLP-1R agonist counteracts against NAFLD through cAMP-PKA axis44. In our work, elevated cAMP levels may also be permissive to activation of IKKβ that, in turn, activates the p65 subunit of NF-κB and protects against Con A-induced liver apoptosis. In accordance with this, hepatocyte-specific IKKβ knockout mice have been shown to be highly sensitive to Con A-induced liver damage because of membrane-bound TNF-α activation19. We found that some infiltrating CD3+ T cells contain TNF-α on their cell surface in livers of hCNR1+/+ mice that would interact with TNFR2 expressed on hepatocytes and cause apoptotic cell death. Interestingly, the levels of these double-positive T cells were drastically reduced in livers of hCNR1−/− mice. Moreover, we found that the expression level of TNFR2, but not TNFR1, was significantly lower in livers from hCNR1−/− mice, indicating yet a second layer of protection against membrane bound TNF-α. Compared to p65-deficient mice, p65-sufficient mice have enhanced survival16. In line with these results, we observed a significant reduction in inflammatory cytokine production and cell death.
In summary, the current study provides evidence that peripheral CB1R nullification or blockade protects the liver from injury during an acute toxic insult. Global CB1R antagonism orchestrates multiple downstream signaling resulting in protection against liver injury of an insidious nature such as FLD. However, there is strong epidemiological evidence that CB1R inhibition over a long-term timeframe puts people at risk for adverse psychiatric effects and therefore CB1R antagonists need to be devoid of central psychiatric effects in order to be a useful therapeutic strategy in the pathogenesis of toxin-induced liver diseases. The present set of investigations now provides strong evidence for protection against acute toxin-induced injury by CB1R blockade in both whole liver in vivo in animals and in vitro in hepatocytes, and under such circumstances CB1R antagonism would be an acute treatment, thereby rendering any CNS effects mute. Taken together, our data define a role for CR1R antagonism in protection against liver damage by extrinsic stimuli, pointing toward the benefits of developing a therapeutic strategy involving a CB1R antagonist in the setting of a toxin-induced liver injury, especially during the acute phase of toxicity.
Materials and methods
Animals
All procedures for the use of the mice followed protocols approved by the National Institute on Aging (NIA) which is fully accredited by the American Association for Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care, and all procedures were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the NIA Intramural Research Program. All animals were housed at NIA. Hepatocyte-specific CB1−/− mice (hCNR1−/−) and control animal (hCNR1+/+) littermates were developed by breeding with mice carrying the albumin-Cre gene (Alb-Cre; Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, ME) to CNR1flox/flox mice22. Male age-matched (8–14 weeks) hCNR1−/− and hCNR1+/+ mice were randomly divided into two groups (n = 6 per group) and were given a single intravenous injection of Con A dissolved in PBS into the tail vein (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) at 2.0, 3.75, 5.0, and 7.5 mg/kg body weight. The concentrations of Con A used in this study were determined from previous studies45.
Serum analysis
Mice were anesthetized, blood was collected by cardiac puncture, and serum was separated by centrifugation at 3000 r.p.m. for 20 min. Serum levels of ALT activity were measured with ALT assay kit (Pointe Scientific, Canton, MI) or ALT/SGPT activity assay kit (BioVision, Milpitas, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Cytokines assay
Cytokine expression in serum was assessed by Bio-Rad BioPlex 200 instrument equipped with Bio-Plex Manager software version 6.0 (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). The levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-1beta (IL-1β), interleukin-17 (IL-17), interferon gamma (IFN-γ), and TNF-α were detected using the Bio-Plex Pro Mouse Cytokine Th17 Panel A 6-Plex Group l Kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories,) on a Luminex 200 system (Bio-Rad Laboratories) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Histopathology
For histological processing, liver tissues were removed from each mouse and fixed in fresh 4% paraformaldehyde for 24 h. Fixed liver tissues were dehydrated using a graded series of alcohol and embedded in paraffin. The sample liver tissues were then cut into 5-µm-thick sections. The paraffin sections were de-paraffinized and hydrated. Sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Imaging was conducted at ×10 and ×40 using an inverted Keyence BZ-710 microscope (King of Prussia, PA). The average area of inflammatory cell infiltration and necrosis area were assessed using HALO image analysis software, v.2.21870.31 (Indica Labs, Corrales, NM).
cAMP assay
Livers were ground and lysed in 0.1 M HCl for determination of cAMP by ELISA. cAMP levels were determined using a cAMP ELISA kit from Enzo Life Sciences (Farmingdale, NY) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The final concentration of cAMP was normalized to protein concentration using a BCA protein assay (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL).
Immunoblotting
Western blot analyses was performed as previously described46. In brief, liver tissues were lysed in tissue lysis buffer that contained 25 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 2 mM Na3VO4, 10 mM NaF, 10 mM Na4P2O7, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM EDTA, and 1% NP-40 with protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktails. The concentrations of protein from each sample were measured by BCA protein assay (Thermoscientific, Rockford, IL). For nuclear and cytoplasmic fractionation, we used NE-PER Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Reagents (Thermoscientific). For western blotting, protein lysates were mixed with 5× Laemmli buffer and then boiled at 100 °C for 5 min. After resolving in SDS-PAGE, the proteins were transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane. The membrane was blocked in blocking reagent (LI-COR, Lincoln, NE) assay system for 1 h at room temperature (RT), followed by incubation with primary antibody in blocking reagent with 0.1% Tween-20 at 4 °C overnight. After probing with the specific antibody, the membrane was washed three times in 0.1% TBST, followed by incubation with secondary antibody in blocking reagent with 0.1% Tween-20 at RT for 1 h, and washed again in TBST (three times for 20 min). Anti-caspase 3, cleaved caspase 3, PARP, cleaved PARP, Bcl-2, β-tubulin, p-p65, p65, IKKβ, lamin A/C, GAPDH, p-PKA, PKA, p-JNK, JNK, p-ERK1/2, and ERK1/2 were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Waltham, MA) and anti-AC was obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Dallas, TX). Immunoblots were developed using a chemiluminescence assay system, and bands were visualized using X-ray films. Densitometry was performed with ImageJ (NIH) for quantifications.
Quantitative real-time PCR
RNA was extracted using a RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Purified RNA was converted into cDNA using qScript cDNA Supermix (Quanta Biosciences, Gaithersburg, MD) for mouse livers and primary hepatocytes. CB1 receptor gene expression was quantified using SYBR green (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) on StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) and values were normalized to 18S. The mouse primers for CB1 receptor were forward: 5′-AAGTCGATCTTAGACGGCCTT-3′ and reverse: 5′-TCCTAATTTGGATGCCATGTCTC-3′ (Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA). For CB2 receptor expression study, the exon-specific primers and fluorescent FAM-labeled and minor grove binder (MGB) conjugated probe of mCB2 genes were designed (MGB TaqMan probe: TGGGCCCAGTCTT, forward: 5′-GCCACCCAGCAAACATCTCT-3′ and reverse: 5′-GATGGGCTTTGGCTTCTTCTAC-3′) using Primer Express (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Universal 18S primers were purchased from ThermoFisher Scientific. Applied Biosystems TaqMan probe (Mm01212171_s1), TaqMan™ PreAmp Master Mix (Cat: 4391128), and Fast Advanced Master Mix (Cat: 4444557) were used to detect very low level of hepatocyte CB1R. We used ten cycles for preamplification and 40 cycles for TaqMan assay using 3 µL of pre-amplificated template according to the manufacture’s protocol.
Immunofluorescent staining of livers and quantification
Slides were rehydrated with graded series of ethanol concentrations, washed in reverse osmosis water, and then washed three times (2 min) in TBS. Antigen retrieval was performed by placing the slides in 10 mM of sodium citrate buffer (pH, 6.0; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) at 95 °C for 30 min. The slides were allowed to cool at room temperature in the citrate buffer for a further 30 min and were then rinsed in TBS as before. Sections were incubated with normal goat serum block consisting of 2% goat serum, 1% OmniPur® BSA Fraction V, 0.1% gelatin, 0.05% Tween 20, and 0.05% sodium azide (all from Sigma-Aldrich) in TBS for 1 h at room temperature. Sections were then incubated in primary antibody diluted in the same normal goat serum block, overnight at 4 °C. The following primary antibodies were used: mouse anti-TNF-alpha (1:100, Abcam, ab1793) and rat anti-CD3 (1:100, R&D Systems MAB4841). Sections were then washed three times (2 min) in 0.1% Tween-20 in 1× TBS (pH, 7.4), followed by incubation with the specific secondary antibody diluted in the normal goat serum block for 1 h at room temperature. Secondary antibodies used were goat anti-mouse IgG1 Alexa Fluor 568, and goat-rat Alexa Fluor 488, all from Thermo Fisher Scientific. After washing in 0.1% Tween-20 in 1× TBS as before, sections were incubated for 15 min with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (Sigma Aldrich) for nuclear staining. Slides were next washed in TBS twice for 2 min each time before being mounted with Permafluor Mountant (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The correlation of the expression levels of CD3 and TNF-alpha in liver sections was assessed by relative quantification of respective immunofluorescence staining for each protein. Using ImageJ, the Integrated Density Value (IDV) for each channel was measured (Blue = DAPI; Green = CD3; Red = TNF-alpha). An average number of nuclei in each section was estimated by dividing the total IDV of blue channel by the average IDV of 20 selected nuclei. IDV for each protein was calculated by dividing total IDV of each respective channel by the estimated number of nuclei in each section. Relative expression levels were calculated normalizing the IDV by the average IDVs of the control group (wild-type animals) in each channel. Unpaired t-tests were used to check for statistical significance.
Microarray analysis
Microarray experiments and analysis were performed as we previously described47. Data analysis were performed using R Studio 1.2.
Statistical analysis
The time-course and dose-response of ALT levels were analyzed using two-way ANOVA. Quantitative data are represented as the mean ± S.E.M. Quantification analysis for western blot band density and imaging pixels and levels of cytokines was conducted using unpaired two-tailed t test after outlier test (α = 0.05). GraphPad Prism (Prism 7; GraphPad Inc.) was used to perform statistical analysis; *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, and ****p ≤ 0.0001 were considered statistically significant (* compared to control).
Supplementary information
Untitled section
Acknowledgements
We thank Doyle Lu Lang for performing quantification of H&E staining data and Dr. Olga D. Carlson and Dr. Qinghua Chen for performing analysis of cytokines in serum. This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute on Aging.
Data availability
The microarray data have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus database under accession code GSE148309.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Footnote Group
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at (10.1038/s41419-020-03261-8).
References
Untitled section
References
- 1.Heneghan MA, Yeoman AD, Verma S, Smith AD, Longhi MS. Autoimmune hepatitis. Lancet. 2013;382:1433–1444. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62163-1.
- 2.Ballegeer, M. & Libert, C. Different cell types involved in mediating concanavalin A induced liver injury: a comprehensive overview. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Res. 1 (2016).
- 3.Gantner F, Leist M, Lohse AW, Germann PG, Tiegs G. Concanavalin A-induced T-cell-mediated hepatic injury in mice: the role of tumor necrosis factor. Hepatology. 1995;21:190–198. doi: 10.1016/0270-9139(95)90428-x.
- 4.Takeda K, et al. Critical contribution of liver natural killer T cells to a murine model of hepatitis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2000;97:5498–5503. doi: 10.1073/pnas.040566697.
- 5.Gómez R, et al. A peripheral mechanism for CB1 cannabinoid receptor-dependent modulation of feeding. J. Neurosci. 2002;22:9612–9617. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-21-09612.2002.
- 6.Lotersztajn S, et al. CB2 receptors as new therapeutic targets for liver diseases. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2008;153:286–289. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707511.
- 7.Teixeira-Clerc F, et al. CB1 cannabinoid receptor antagonism: a new strategy for the treatment of liver fibrosis. Nat. Med. 2006;12:671. doi: 10.1038/nm1421.
- 8.Mallat A, Teixeira-Clerc F, Lotersztajn S. Cannabinoid signaling and liver therapeutics. J. Hepatol. 2013;59:891–896. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.03.032.
- 9.Julien B, et al. Antifibrogenic role of the cannabinoid receptor CB2 in the liver. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:742–755. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.12.050.
- 10.Basu P, Aloysius M, Shah N, Brown R., Jr The endocannabinoid system in liver disease, a potential therapeutic target. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2014;39:790–801. doi: 10.1111/apt.12673.
- 11.Trebicka J, et al. Role of cannabinoid receptors in alcoholic hepatic injury: steatosis and fibrogenesis are increased in CB2 receptor-deficient mice and decreased in CB1 receptor knockouts. Liver Int. 2011;31:860–870. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2011.02496.x.
- 12.Osei-Hyiaman D, et al. Hepatic CB 1 receptor is required for development of diet-induced steatosis, dyslipidemia, and insulin and leptin resistance in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 2008;118:3160–3169. doi: 10.1172/JCI34827.
- 13.González-Mariscal I, et al. Human CB1 receptor isoforms, present in hepatocytes and β-cells, are involved in regulating metabolism. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:33302. doi: 10.1038/srep33302.
- 14.Kojima M, et al. Selective CB1 cannabinoid receptor antagonist, SR141716A, attenuates liver injury induced by concanavalin A. Hepatol. Res. 2009;39:408–414. doi: 10.1111/j.1872-034X.2008.00473.x.
- 15.Hegde VL, et al. Attenuation of experimental autoimmune hepatitis by exogenous and endogenous cannabinoids: involvement of regulatory T cells. Mol. Pharmacol. 2008;74:20–33. doi: 10.1124/mol.108.047035.
- 16.Beg AA, Baltimore D. An essential role for NF-κB in preventing TNF-α-induced cell death. Science. 1996;274:782–784. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5288.782.
- 17.Beg AA, William CS, Bronson RT, Ghosh S, Baltimore D. Embryonic lethality and liver degeneration in mice lacking the RelA component of NF-κB. Nature. 1995;376:167. doi: 10.1038/376167a0.
- 18.Christian F, Smith E, Carmody R. The regulation of NF-κB subunits by phosphorylation. Cells. 2016;5:12. doi: 10.3390/cells5010012.
- 19.Maeda S, et al. IKKβ is required for prevention of apoptosis mediated by cell-bound but not by circulating TNFα. Immunity. 2003;19:725–737. doi: 10.1016/S1074-7613(03)00301-7.
- 20.Li Z-W, et al. The IKKβ subunit of IκB kinase (IKK) is essential for nuclear factor κB activation and prevention of apoptosis. J. Exp. Med. 1999;189:1839–1845. doi: 10.1084/jem.189.11.1839.
- 21.Howlett A, et al. International Union of Pharmacology. XXVII. Classification of cannabinoid receptors. Pharmacol. Rev. 2002;54:161–202. doi: 10.1124/pr.54.2.161.
- 22.González-Mariscal I, et al. Absence of cannabinoid 1 receptor in beta cells protects against high-fat/high-sugar diet-induced beta cell dysfunction and inflammation in murine islets. Diabetologia. 2018;61:1470–1483. doi: 10.1007/s00125-018-4576-4.
- 23.Maccarrone M, Finazzi-Agro A. The endocannabinoid system, anandamide and the regulation of mammalian cell apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2003;10:946. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401284.
- 24.Turu G, Hunyady L. Signal transduction of the CB1 cannabinoid receptor. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2010;44:75–85. doi: 10.1677/JME-08-0190.
- 25.Stork PJ, Schmitt JM. Crosstalk between cAMP and MAP kinase signaling in the regulation of cell proliferation. Trends Cell Biol. 2002;12:258–266. doi: 10.1016/S0962-8924(02)02294-8.
- 26.Tiegs G, Hentschel J, Wendel A. AT cell-dependent experimental liver injury in mice inducible by concanavalin A. J. Clin. Invest. 1992;90:196–203. doi: 10.1172/JCI115836.
- 27.Trautwein C, et al. Concanavalin A—induced liver cell damage: activation of intracellular pathways triggered by tumor necrosis factor in mice. Gastroenterology. 1998;114:1035–1045. doi: 10.1016/S0016-5085(98)70324-5.
- 28.Chorvat RJ, Berbaum J, Seriacki K, McElroy JF. JD-5006 and JD-5037: peripherally restricted (PR) cannabinoid-1 receptor blockers related to SLV-319 (Ibipinabant) as metabolic disorder therapeutics devoid of CNS liabilities. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2012;22:6173–6180. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2012.08.004.
- 29.Jourdan T, et al. Decreasing CB1 receptor signaling in Kupffer cells improves insulin sensitivity in obese mice. Mol. Metab. 2017;6:1517–1528. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2017.08.011.
- 30.Siegmund SrV, Schwabe RF. Endocannabinoids and liver disease. II. Endocannabinoids in the pathogenesis and treatment of liver fibrosis. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2008;294:G357–G362. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00456.2007.
- 31.Lavon I, et al. A novel synthetic cannabinoid derivative inhibits inflammatory liver damage via negative cytokine regulation. Mol. Pharmacol. 2003;64:1334–1341. doi: 10.1124/mol.64.6.1334.
- 32.Xu, X. et al. Overexpression of cannabinoid receptors CB1 and CB2 correlates with improved prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet.171, 31–38 (2006).
- 33.Bátkai, S. et al. Endocannabinoids acting at vascular CB 1 receptors mediate the vasodilated state in advanced liver cirrhosis. Nat. Med.7, 827–832 (2001).
- 34.Pertwee, R. G. Inverse agonism and neutral antagonism at cannabinoid CB1 receptors. Life Sci.76, 1307–1324 (2005).
- 35.Jourdan T, et al. Cannabinoid-1 receptor deletion in podocytes mitigates both glomerular and tubular dysfunction in a mouse model of diabetic nephropathy. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2018;20:698–708. doi: 10.1111/dom.13150.
- 36.Hawkins P, Stephens L. PI3K signalling in inflammation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2015;1851:882–897. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2014.12.006.
- 37.Gómez del Pulgar T, Velasco G, Guzman M. The CB1 cannabinoid receptor is coupled to the activation of protein kinase B/Akt. Biochem. J. 2000;347:369–373. doi: 10.1042/bj3470369.
- 38.Koyama Y, Brenner DA. Liver inflammation and fibrosis. J. Clin. Invest. 2017;127:55–64. doi: 10.1172/JCI88881.
- 39.Tan, S., Liu, H., Ke, B., Jiang, J. & Wu, B. The peripheral CB1 receptor antagonist JD5037 attenuates liver fibrosis via a CB1 receptor/β-arrestin1/Akt pathway. Br. J. Pharmacol.177, 2830–2847 (2020).
- 40.Zhang J, et al. Cyclic AMP inhibits JNK activation by CREB-mediated induction of c-FLIP L and MKP-1, thereby antagonizing UV-induced apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2008;15:1654. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2008.87.
- 41.González-Mariscal I, Krzysik-Walker SM, Kim W, Rouse M, Egan JM. Blockade of cannabinoid 1 receptor improves GLP-1R mediated insulin secretion in mice. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2016;423:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2015.12.015.
- 42.Shin H, et al. Blockade of cannabinoid 1 receptor improves glucose responsiveness in pancreatic beta cells. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2018;22:2337–2345. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.13523.
- 43.Brissard L, et al. Orosensory detection of dietary fatty acids is altered in CB1R−/− mice. Nutrients. 2018;10:1347. doi: 10.3390/nu10101347.
- 44.Zhou M, et al. The anti-diabetic drug exenatide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, counteracts hepatocarcinogenesis through cAMP–PKA–EGFR–STAT3 axis. Oncogene. 2017;36:4135–4149. doi: 10.1038/onc.2017.38.
- 45.Heymann F, Hamesch K, Weiskirchen R, Tacke F. The concanavalin A model of acute hepatitis in mice. Lab. Anim. 2015;49:12–20. doi: 10.1177/0023677215572841.
- 46.Bodogai M, et al. Commensal bacteria contribute to insulin resistance in aging by activating innate B1a cells. Sci. Transl. Med. 2018;10:eaat4271. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aat4271.
- 47.Gonz lez-Mariscal I, et al. Muscle cannabinoid 1 receptor regulates Il-6 and myostatin expression, governing physical performance and whole-body metabolism. FASEB J. 2019;33:5850–5863. doi: 10.1096/fj.201801145R.
Associated Data
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The microarray data have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus database under accession code GSE148309.