Impact of UTT on anticipated stigma among patients newly diagnosed with HIV in Johannesburg, South Africa
1Health Economics and Epidemiology Research Office, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
2Department of Work and Social Psychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
3The South African National Aids Council, National Strategic Plan Unit, Hatfield, S.A
4HIV Survivors and Partners Network, Centurion, S.A
*Correspondence: Dorina Onoya, PhD 39 Empire Road Health Economics and Epidemiology Research Office, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa Correspondence: donoya@heroza.orgABSTRACT
Background
Anticipated stigma – the fear that HIV diagnosis and status disclosure could have negative social implications – may adversely affect engagement with HIV care and treatment, despite universal eligibility for treatment under universal-test-and-treat (UTT). We aimed to determine the prevalence and predictors of anticipated stigma among newly HIV-diagnosed individuals in the context of universal access to treatment in Johannesburg, South Africa.
Methods
We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 652 newly HIV-diagnosed adults (≥18 years) (64.1% female, with a median age of 33 years and an interquartile range [IQR] of 28–39 years) enrolled from October 2017 to August 2018 at four primary healthcare clinics in Johannesburg. Participants were interviewed immediately after receiving their HIV test results. We used an adapted five-item, four-point scale measuring agreement with statements regarding HIV disclosure concerns and HIV status concealment (Cronbach’s alpha =.82). Mean scores were categorized as “low-to-medium” (score<=2.5), or “high” (score>2.5). We used Modified Poisson regression to assess predictors of high anticipated stigma and report adjusted risk ratios (aRR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Results
Overall, 55% of study participants had high anticipated stigma; 55.8% for males, 61.1% for 18–29-year-olds, and 43% for those married. Individuals in an unmarried relationship were more likely to experience high anticipated stigma than those married (aRR 1.10, 95% CI: 1.01-1.18). High anticipated stigma was lower among: older individuals (aRR 0.94 for being 30-39 vs 18-29 years, 95% CI: 0.88-0.99), those with a primary home in another province/rural area (aRR 0.82 another province vs current house, 95% CI: 0.78-0.87) or another country (aRR 0.83 another country vs current house, 95% CI: 0.78-0.88), those living in current homes for ≥5 years (aRR 0.93 for >5 years vs <1 year, 95% CI: 0.88-0.99), those with low ART concerns (aRR 0.86, 95 % CI: 0.82-0.90), and those with low perceived social-support (aRR 0.79 for low vs high, 95 % CI: 0.70-0.88).
Conclusion
Over 50% of adults diagnosed with HIV in the UTT era had high anticipated stigma. Findings highlight the need to address factors that continue to drive anticipated stigma, to improve social integration and mitigate the potential impact on engagement in HIV care. In addition, enhancing coping skills among individuals living with HIV is crucial.
Article notes
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was made possible by the generous support of the American People and the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) through US Agency for International Development (USAID) under the terms of Cooperative Agreements AID-674-A-12-00029 and 72067419CA00004 to Health Economics and Epidemiology Research Office and under the terms of Cooperative Agreement 674-A-00-09-00018-00 to Boston University. We were also supported by the grant 1R01AI152149-01 from the National Institute of Health (NIH). The contents are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NIH, PEPFAR, USAID or the United States Government.
INTRODUCTION
South Africa has made substantial progress towards achieving the 95-95-95 targets set by UNAIDS[1], reaching 95.4% of people living with HIV (PLHIV) diagnosed, of those diagnosed, 78.7% on Antiretroviral Treatment (ART), and 91.3% of those on treatment achieving viral suppression as of 2023[2]. In recent years, access to ART is widespread, and HIV has become more of a chronic health condition as people living with HIV (PLHIV) can now live longer. However, while the same-day ART initiation has been an essential step in increasing accessibility[3, 4], it does not directly address social challenges that PLHIV continue to face[5]. While treatment improves the personal health and longevity outlook of the individual living with HIV, it does not address the social reintegration needed to facilitate the return to normal social interactions.
HIV denialism previously fuelled stigma, questioning the link between HIV and AIDS, and delaying the rollout of ART[6]. This was coupled with misinformation, shame, and reluctance to disclose one’s status[7]. The stigma index has significantly reduced over time, particularly external and social stigma in South Africa, which includes denial of some services for PLHIV; however, internalised stigma, characterised by feelings of low self-worth, guilt, and shame, persists[8]. This internal stigma fuels anticipated social stigma, resulting in self-isolation that has a detrimental impact on PLHIV’s quality of life. Recent work has shown that PLHIV still anticipate and experience stigma in the context of romantic relationships (starting or maintaining)[9].
While ART access has improved in South Africa, treatment disengagement and inconsistent adherence to ART remain a threat to achieving sustained viral suppression and eliminating HIV in resource-limited settings[10–12]. Anticipated stigma is defined as a belief and expectation by PLHIV of future repercussions and ill treatment due to their HIV positive status. PLHIV who anticipate stigma may withdraw from social relationships in an attempt to minimise potential discrimination, leading to social isolation and withdrawal from potentially supportive networks[13]. Among other factors, anticipated stigma is a significant predictor of poor adherence [14–16]. Anticipated stigma has also been associated with distrust of healthcare workers [17], increased medication concerns, and low treatment knowledge. PLHIV also fear that engaging in ART care may unintentionally reveal one’s HIV status through regular clinic visits and carrying medication or printed medical information[13]. PLHIV have voiced concerns that unintentional disclosure would result in stigmatisation[18].
Other studies have shown that anticipated stigma negatively impacts testing for HIV, a barrier to ART initiation, and several studies have shown HIV-related stigma to be associated with depressive symptoms among PLHIV[19, 20]. This may result in social withdrawal and isolation as individuals tend to suppress their emotions due to fears of being stigmatised[21].
The National Strategic Plan (NSP) for 2023 identified stigma as one of the important issues to be addressed. It called for interventions to address this[22]. These include evidence-based interventions, community engagement, and collaborations between different sectors. In light of the changes in treatment guidelines, we aimed to determine the prevalence and predictors of anticipated stigma among newly HIV-diagnosed individuals under the UTT policy in Johannesburg, South Africa.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The enrolment of patients was conducted according to previously described criteria [23]. Patients were interviewed immediately after HIV diagnosis, and ART initiation was determined through medical record review up to six months post-test. Participants self-reported being newly diagnosed during the screening process. Enrolled patients with a prior history of ART were excluded from the analytic dataset. We also excluded patients who were psychologically unable or too sick to participate, unwilling to provide consent or planned to get treatment elsewhere. Additionally, women who were pregnant at HIV diagnosis were excluded from the study because in-pregnancy treatment initiation and care processes differ from those of non-pregnant women. Our study population included participants with a median age of 33 years (IQR: 28.0-39.0), 64.1% were female, 58.9% had some secondary level of education and 14.1% were married.
Variable definitions
We used an adapted five-item, four-point scale (1-“strongly agree” to 5-“strongly disagree”) measuring agreement with statements regarding HIV disclosure concerns and HIV status concealment. Questions included concerns regarding rejection, fear of being judged, concerns about the risk of disclosure to others, feelings of shame regarding the diagnosis, and a need to keep the diagnosis as a secret. All questions were closed-ended with options For the final analysis, we dichotomized the final outcome of anticipated stigma whereby mean scores were categorized as “low-to-medium” (if the score<=2.5), or “high” (if the score>2.5)[24, 25].
Other socio-demographic factors assessed included age, sex, highest education completed, marital status, employment status, whether the patient was the household breadwinner, the number of child dependents the patient had, and primary source of income. Factors related to health care access, including the history of visiting the testing clinic or any other health provider, and HIV testing history were also assessed. Additional factors also included a history of sexual risk behaviour, including condom usage at last sex, number of sexual partners in the previous twelve months and to whom the patients had disclosed their intention to come for HIV testing, and whether the patients were accompanied by anyone to the testing clinic[23].
The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the University of Witwatersrand (M1704122). All personal identifiers were removed from the final analytic dataset.
Statistical analysis
We describe the characteristics of study participants using proportions, frequencies, means with standard deviation (SD), and medians with interquartile ranges (IQRs) as appropriate. Factors associated with the prevalence of high anticipated stigma among newly diagnosed patients were assessed using the Modified Poisson regression and report adjusted risk ratios (aRR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Data analysis was conducted using STATA version 14 (StataCorp, College Station, TX).
RESULTS
Demographic and clinical characteristics of newly diagnosed HIV patients by their gender
A total of 652 newly HIV diagnosed participants were enrolled (Table 1). Participants had a median age of 33 years (IQR: 28.0-39.0), 64.1% were female, and 35.3% were married. Over half of the participants (51.5%) spoke Nguni languages (which include: Zulu, Xhosa, Ndebele, Swati, etc.). More than half of the participants were employed and 47.2% of the employed were female. Additionally, only 62.4% had disclosed their intention to test for HIV before the clinic visit and 26.0% were accompanied to the testing site. However, participants’ baseline intention to start ART was nearly universal at 99.4%, with only 0.6% planning to never start ART. Similarly, 96.3% of participants intended to disclose their HIV-positive status, 4.7% had low perceived social support, and 67% of those were females, and 52% had medium concerns about ART.
High anticipated stigma among newly diagnosed patients
Overall, 55% of the participants were classified as having high anticipated stigma while 45% were classified as having low to medium anticipated stigma (Fig 1). Among male participants, 56% had high anticipated stigma compared to 54% of females in the same population. Regarding age, the majority (50.7%) of participants with high anticipated stigma were aged between 30 and 40 years, 35% were aged between 18 and 29 years, and 24% were older than 40 years at the time of enrollment. Regarding marital status, 43% of those who married, 60% of those who were in a cohabiting relationship, 56% of those who were in a non-cohabiting relationship and 54% of those who were single had high anticipated stigma.
Correlates of high anticipated HIV stigma among newly diagnosed
After adjusting for demographic patients’ characteristics, unmarried individuals who were in a relationship were more likely to have high anticipated stigma than married participants (aRR 1.10, 95% CI: 1.01-1.18). High anticipated stigma was lower among: older individuals (aRR 0.94 for being 30-39 vs 18-29 years, 95% CI: 0.88-0.99), those having a primary house in another province/rural (aRR 0.82 for primary house in another country vs current house, 95% CI: 0.78-0.87), (aRR 0.83 for primary house in another country vs current house, 95% CI: 0.78-0.88), those living in current homes for ≥5 years (aRR 0.93 for >5 years vs <1 year, 95% CI: 0.88-0.99), those with low ART concerns (aRR 0.86, 95 % CI: 0.82-0.90), and those with low perceived social-support (aRR 0.79 for low vs high, 95 % CI: 0.70-0.88). However, gender, level of education, person to whom they had they had intended to disclose, reason for HIV testing, and level of depression did not show association with anticipated stigma among the newly diagnosed.
DISCUSSION
The current study measured the prevalence of anticipated stigma among patients newly diagnosed with HIV between October 2017 to August 2018. Our results indicate that over 50% of this population had high anticipated stigma, which is a cause for concern, considering all of these participants had just received HIV counselling. This result indicates that despite the scale of treatment in South Africa and advances to make HIV more manageable, the expectation of social stigma remains a challenge[26].
The findings also showed similarly high anticipated stigma for male and female participants. These findings are consistent with findings from studies in South Africa, which indicated that both males and females had high levels of external stigma [27, 28]. In other settings, however, several studies have shown stigma to be higher in women compared to men [29–31], as women are traditionally held to higher moral standards than men and expected to uphold the moral foundation of society. But other studies did not find gender differences in relation to anticipated stigma[32]. This could be explained by studies that recruit participants from the clinic-based settings where men and women might already be accessing HIV care. These shared experiences may reduce perceived stigma differences by gender. Furthermore, in settings where treatment access and awareness are high, stigma may be declining in both genders, making it harder to detect if there are any differences.
Furthermore, unmarried individuals who were in a relationship reported higher anticipated stigma than those who were married. Previous research has shown that anticipated stigma is significantly associated with non-disclosure of HIV status, particularly among women. This barrier is especially pronounced among women who are not in stable relationships, where fear of rejection or negative consequences can discourage disclosure[33, 34]. While stigmatizing attitudes held by their communities may affect all living with HIV, those who are married or living with a partner may have additional emotional and social support that acts as a barrier to community-level prejudice[35, 36]. However, other studies report that married persons also face anticipated stigma. Their concerns or anxieties include the fear of stigmatisation, the fear of divorce or rejection by their partners, intimate partner violence and the fear that they may be accused of infidelity[37]. Unmarried individuals might worry more about social stigma and be more afraid to disclose because there’s a chance they won’t find future sexual partners, and those with partners may fear being rejected and losing those relationships[9]. The findings are, however, in contrast to previous findings, which reported that single participants reported less stigma compared to their counterparts[38].
Conversely, older participants (30 -39) reported a lower risk of anticipated stigma compared to younger participants, and this finding is consistent with previous findings that normalisation of HIV as a chronic condition, whereby older people compare HIV to other chronic conditions such as hypertension and diabetes[39]. Similarly, those with low ART concerns were less likely to report anticipated stigma, this could be explained by the fact that they have higher factual knowledge of HIV/ART[40]. Knowledge was shown to be associated with reduced concerns as they are more aware of their diagnosis and treatment and generally have a more positive outlook.
Furthermore, those with low perceived social support were also less likely to report anticipated stigma. This could be as a result of them having developed coping mechanisms that help them handle stigma better and potential for alternative sources of validation. The findings are again in contrast to previous research that has shown that the support from friends and family is valuable to counter stigma[41, 42].
Study limitations
Firstly, we only surveyed HIV positive patients who had engaged in healthcare services; it is possible that some HIV positive people are more likely to report anticipated stigma and would have completely avoided testing, and this could explain the inability to observe some of the previously reported factors. Secondly, we interviewed patients immediately after their post-test counselling and it is possible that some may have, and it is possible that some may not have had sufficient time to adequately process their diagnosis and think about other aspects of their lives.
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings show that over 50% of adults diagnosed with HIV in the UTT era experienced high anticipated stigma. These findings suggest that stigma remains pervasive and highlight the need to address factors that continue to drive anticipated stigma, to mitigate the potential impact on engagement in HIV care. HIV programs need to be more focused on strategies that directly address stigma upon diagnosis.
Data Availability
The de-identified data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request, subject to ethical approvals and data use agreements in place.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We extend our gratitude to the data collection team (Julia Mogwasi, Jan Maobela, Nokukhanya Mhlanga, Vinolia Njinkelanga, Zoleka Luvuno, Nonhlanhla Tshabalala) for their diligent support during the study implementation. Additionally, our sincere thanks go to the City of Johannesburg and the staff of participating clinics for accommodating the study. We also thank patients attending these clinics for their willingness to participate and share their valuable information.