Cannabidiol negatively modulates adenosine A2A receptor functioning in living cells.

Abstract

Objectives:

Cannabidiol (CBD) is a phytocannabinoid with great potential in clinical applications. The mechanism(s) of action of CBD require further investigation. Previous studies suggested that adenosine A_2A receptors (A_2ARs) could play a role in CBD-induced effects. Here, we evaluated the ability of CBD to modify the function of A_2AR.

Methods:

We used HEK-293T cells transfected with the cDNA encoding the human A_2AR and Gαs protein, both modified to perform bioluminescence-based assays. We first assessed the effect of CBD on A_2AR ligand binding using an A_2AR NanoLuciferase sensor. Next, we evaluated whether CBD modified A_2AR coupling to mini-Gαs proteins using the NanoBiT^™ assay. Finally, we further assessed CBD effects on A_2AR intrinsic activity by recording agonist-induced cAMP accumulation.

Results:

CBD did not bind orthosterically to A_2AR but reduced the coupling of A_2AR to Gαs protein and the subsequent generation of cAMP.

Conclusion:

CBD negatively modulates A_2AR functioning.

Untitled section

Keywords: cannabidiol, adenosine 2A receptor, negative allosteric regulation, competitive binding, cyclic AMP, luminescence-based assays

Article notes

Untitled section

Issue date 2024 Oct.

Author notes

Introduction

Cannabidiol (CBD) is a phytocannabinoid isolated from Cannabis sativa without psychoactive properties, but with potential benefits against multiple pathological conditions (ElSohly et al., 2017). Several preclinical reports demonstrated protective and anti-inflammatory effects of CBD in a wide spectrum of neurodegenerative diseases, neuroinflammatory processes, stroke, colitis, liver, kidney injury, cardiovascular disease, arthritis, sepsis, diabetes, cancer, and epilepsy models (Pacher et al., 2020). Furthermore, CBD exerted positive effects in experimental models of other neuropsychiatric disorders such as epilepsy, anxiety, schizophrenia, dementia, addiction, and neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (Devinsky et al., 2014). Although its translation to clinical trials is somewhat limited to date, the successful case of Epidiolex^®, an oral solution based on a botanical extract containing purified CBD, is notable. Epidiolex^® was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2018 for the treatment of Lennox-Gastaut and Dravet syndromes, two rare and debilitating genetic forms of epilepsy in children. Additionally, CBD is currently under clinical evaluation for other conditions, including different forms of pain, obsessive-compulsive disorders, and behavioural problems associated with intellectual disability or autism, among others (ClinicalTrials.gov database).

Despite growing interest in its potential clinical applications, the mechanism(s) of action of CBD require further exploration. CBD has a very low affinity for the orthosteric site of CB₁ and CB₂ receptors, the main G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that belong to the endogenous cannabinoid system (McPartland et al., 2015). Alternatively, CBD can act on multiple targets, including TRPV1 channels and PPARγ, adenosine A_2A, 5-HT_1A, α₃-glycine, α₁-adrenal, dopamine D₂, GABA_A, μ- and δ-opioid receptors (McPartland et al., 2015). Additionally, CBD can inhibit the activity of GPR55 (Ryberg et al., 2007), an effect that has been associated with its antiepileptic activity (Sylantyev et al., 2013). In the present study, we probed the putative direct effects of CBD on adenosine A_2A receptors (A_2ARs). The relevant role that A_2ARs play in several of the neuropsychiatric disorders in which CBD could offer beneficial effects (i.e. dementia, schizophrenia, epilepsy, depression, anxiety) supports this interest (Domenici et al., 2019). Furthermore, previous preclinical evidence supports the participation of A_2AR in CBD-mediated effects. Thus, A_2AR antagonists blocked the anti-inflammatory effects of CBD (Liou et al., 2008; Ribeiro et al., 2012; Mecha et al., 2013; Oláh et al., 2014), or the ability of CBD to blunt Δ⁹-THC-induced cognitive impairment (Aso et al., 2019). Similarly, the genetic deletion of A_2AR reduced the CBD-induced potentiation of the cataleptic and anxiolytic properties of Δ⁹-THC (Stollenwerk et al., 2021). This A_2AR-dependent activity of CBD was proposed to depend on the ability of CBD to bind to the equilibrative nucleoside transporter (ENT). Thus, inhibition of adenosine uptake would lead to indirect activation of A_2AR (Pandolfo et al., 2011). However, a direct effect of CBD on A_2AR has not been further investigated. Here we aimed to evaluate the capacity of CBD to bind to the orthosteric site of A_2AR and/or to modify its intrinsic activity by using state-of-the-art luminescence-based assays.

Materials and methods

Reagents

The ligands used were CGS21680, ZM241385, and CBD (Tocris Bioscience, Bristol, United Kingdom). MRS7396, a fluorescent selective A_2AR orthosteric antagonist derived from SCH442416 and containing a BODIPY630/650 fluorophore, was previously described (Duroux et al., 2017). Other reagents used were Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Sigma Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA), geneticin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA), adenosine deaminase (ADA; Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany), zardaverine (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA, USA), and coelenterazine 400a (NanoLight Technologies, Pinetop, AZ, USA).

Plasmid constructs

To perform bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) experiments and cAMP accumulation assays, we used the A_2AR NanoLuciferase (NanoLuc) sensor (A_2AR^NL), previously described (Lanznaster et al., 2019). To perform the NanoBiT^™ assay, the cDNA encoding human A_2AR was cloned at the BamHI/EcoRV restriction enzyme sites of pIREShyg3-SmBiT (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), as previously described (Sarasola et al., 2022). The construct (A_2AR^SmBiT) was verified by DNA sequencing. The plasmid encoding the mini-Gαs (engineered GTPase domain of Gα subunit; LgBiTmini-Gαs) linked to LgBiT was previously described (Wan et al., 2018; Meyrath et al., 2021).

Cell culture and transfection

Human embryonic kidney (HEK)-293T cells were grown in DMEM supplemented with 1 mM sodium pyruvate (Biowest, Nuaillé, France), 2 mM L-glutamine (Biowest), 100 U/mL streptomycin (Biowest), 100 mg/mL penicillin (Biowest), and 5% (v/v) foetal bovine serum (Invitrogen Corporation, Camarillo, CA, USA) at 37°C and in an atmosphere of 5% CO₂. Cells were transiently transfected with the indicated cDNA construct using polyethylenimine (PEI, 1 mg/mL, Sigma Aldrich), as previously described (Longo et al., 2013). Finally, HEK-293T cells stably expressing A_2AR^NL were grown in the presence of geneticin (1 mg/mL).

NanoBRET experiments

The NanoBRET assay was performed as previously described (Lanznaster et al., 2019). Briefly, HEK-293T cells expressing the A_2AR^NL construct were resuspended in Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS; Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) containing ADA (0.5 U/mL) and plated on white 96-well plates coated with poly-ornithine (Corning, Corning, NY, USA) at a density of 20,000 cells/well. After 24 h, cells were challenged with the fluorescent A_2AR antagonist (MRS7396) in the absence/presence of ZM241385 or CBD and incubated for 1 h at 37°C. Subsequently, coelenterazine 400a was added at a final concentration of 1 μM, and the readings were performed after 15 min using a CLARIOStar microplate reader (BMG Labtech, Durham, NC, USA). Donor and acceptor emission were measured at 490 ± 10 nm and 650 ± 40 nm, respectively. The raw NanoBRET ratio was calculated by dividing the 650 nm emission by the 490 nm emission and the values fitted by nonlinear regression using GraphPad Prism 9 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). The results were expressed as a percentage of the maximum signal obtained (mBU; miliBRET units).

NanoBiT assay

The NanoBiT^™ assay (Promega) was performed as previously described (Sarasola et al., 2022). Briefly, transient transfected HEK-293T cells with A_2AR^SmBiT and ^LgBiTmini-Gαs were resuspended in HBSS containing ADA (0.5 U/mL) and transferred (90 μl) into white 96-well plates (Corning). Subsequently, coelenterazine 400a was added (1 μM) to each well. After 15-minute incubation, basal luminescence was determined using a CLARIOstar plate reader (BMG Labtech). Immediately after the initial measurement (basal), the ligands were added, and the luminescent signal was measured every 5 min for 30 min. The luminescence signal (RLU) was normalised as follows: (RLU_sample – RLU_basal) / RLU_basal.

cAMP assay

cAMP accumulation was measured using the LANCE^® Ultra cAMP Kit (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) as previously described (Lanznaster et al., 2019). Briefly, HEK-293T cells stably expressing the A_2AR^NL construct were first incubated for 1 h at 37°C with stimulation buffer (BSA 0.1%, ADA 0.5 units/mL, zardaverine 2 μM; in serum-free DMEM) and later with CGS21680 (100 nM) and increasing concentrations of ZM241385 or CBD for 30 min at 37°C. Subsequently, cells were transferred (1000 cells/well) into white 384-well plates (Corning), in which reagents were added following the manufacturer’s instructions. After 1 h at room temperature, time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer (TR-FRET) was determined by measuring light emission at 620 nm and 665 nm using a CLARIOstar plate reader (BMG Labtech).

Statistics

Data are represented as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM) with statistical significance set at P < 0.05. The number of samples (n) in each experimental condition is indicated in the legend of the corresponding figure. Outliers were assessed using the ROUT method (Motulsky & Brown, 2006); thus, no sample was excluded assuming a Q value of 1% in GraphPad Prism 9. Comparisons between experimental groups were performed using one-way factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons post hoc test using GraphPad Prism 9 as indicated.

Results

To assess the impact of CBD on A_2AR functionality, we initially evaluated whether CBD modified the binding of MRS7396, a fluorescent A_2AR antagonist. To this end, we took advantage of a previously reported NanoBRET-based A_2AR binding assay (Fig. 1a) (Lanznaster et al., 2019). HEK-293T cells permanently expressing the A_2AR^NL construct were challenged with increasing concentrations of MRS7396, which upon binding to the receptor can act as a compatible acceptor in a BRET process (Fig. 1a). As expected, a saturable hyperbolic curve was obtained for the total binding of MRS7396, which was blocked upon incubation with a saturating concentration (1 μM) of the unlabelled A_2AR antagonist ZM241385 (nonspecific binding; Fig. 1b). The analysis of the specific binding of MRS7396 revealed a dissociation constant (K_D) of 8.5 ± 3.2 nM and a maximum binding capacity (B_max) of 98.9 ± 8.4 %. Next, upon the same experimental conditions, we examined the ability of CBD to attenuate MRS7396 binding. Differently from ZM241385, CBD (1 μM) was unable to modify the specific binding of MRS7396 to the A_2AR (Fig. 1b). Accordingly, no significant differences in affinity (K_D) and receptor capacity (B_max) were found in the presence of CBD (K_D = 8.2 ± 2.7 nM; B_max = 96.9 ± 7.2 %; P = 0.992, F_{(2, 34)} = 0.0079). In addition, we also assessed whether CBD could modulate orthosteric binding of A_2AR by performing a competition binding assay with a fixed concentration of MRS7396 (30 nM). Again, while ZM241385 blocked A_2AR binding, CBD did not significantly modify the NanoBRET signal (Fig. 1c; P = 0.269, F_{(4, 10)} = 1.518). Collectively, these results indicate that CBD does not bind orthosterically to A_2AR.

Determination of CBD effects on A2AR ligand binding affinity. (a) Schematic representation of the NanoBRET assay. A nanoluciferase is linked to the N-terminal part of the A2AR (A2ARNL). When the nanoluciferase substrate coelenterazine is added, A2ARNL (donor) emits light at 490–10 nm. Light excites the fluorescent selective A2AR ligand, MRS7396 (acceptor), which subsequently emits fluorescence at 650–80 nm. (b) NanoBRET saturation binding curves obtained by challenging A2ARNL expressing HEK-293T cells with increasing concentrations of MRS7396 in the absence/presence of CBD (1 μM) or ZM241385 (1 μM). (c) NanoBRET signals obtained by challenging A2ARNL expressing HEK-293T cells with a fixed concentration of MRS7396 (30 nM, normalised to 100%) in the presence of increasing concentrations of CBD or ZM241385. The represented data are mean ± SEM of three independent experiments each performed in triplicate. — Figure 1.Determination of CBD effects on A_2AR ligand binding affinity. (a) Schematic representation of the NanoBRET assay. A nanoluciferase is linked to the N-terminal part of the A_2AR (A_2AR^NL). When the nanoluciferase substrate coelenterazine is added, A_2AR^NL (donor) emits light at 490–10 nm. Light excites the fluorescent selective A_2AR ligand, MRS7396 (acceptor), which subsequently emits fluorescence at 650–80 nm. **(b)** NanoBRET saturation binding curves obtained by challenging A_2AR^NL expressing HEK-293T cells with increasing concentrations of MRS7396 in the absence/presence of CBD (1 μM) or ZM241385 (1 μM). **(c)** NanoBRET signals obtained by challenging A_2AR^NL expressing HEK-293T cells with a fixed concentration of MRS7396 (30 nM, normalised to 100%) in the presence of increasing concentrations of CBD or ZM241385. The represented data are mean ± SEM of three independent experiments each performed in triplicate.

Subsequently, we aimed to determine whether CBD affected A_2AR signalling. To this end, we first evaluated the interaction of A_2AR with mini-Gαs protein using the NanoBiT^™ complementation assay (Sarasola et al., 2022). Accordingly, cells were transiently transfected with the A_2AR^SmBiT and ^LgBiTmini-Gαs constructs, which once expressed allow the reconstitution of the split nanoluciferase and real-time recordings of receptor-effector coupling induced by agonists (Fig. 2a). Cells were challenged with the selective A_2AR agonist CGS21680 (100 nM), which induced a rapid increase in the luminescent signal, reaching a peak at 15 min that remained stable for 30 min. This effect was absent in cells challenged with CBD alone (Fig. 2b). Notably, this agonist-dependent A_2AR interaction with mini-Gαs protein was completely blocked when co-incubating cells with ZM241385 (50 nM, Fig. 2b). Next, we assessed CGS21680-induced A_2AR coupling to Gαs protein in the presence of increasing concentrations of CBD. Interestingly, CBD dose-dependently blocked A_2AR coupling to Gαs protein, both decreasing the maximum peak and the density of the effect (Fig. 2b). Of note, differently from ZM241385, CBD only led to a partial blockade of CGS21680-mediated effects.

Assessment of CBD effects on A2AR intrinsic activity. (a) Schematic representation of the NanoBIT™-based assay. The two fragments of nanoluciferase, small (SmBIT) and large (LgBIT), are fused to A2AR and mini-Gαs protein, respectively. Then, upon agonist binding, A2AR intrinsic activity is assessed by receptor recruitment of Gαs, which induces an increase on luminescence due to nanoluciferase reconstitution. (b) Representative time-course of A2AR agonist-mediated Gαs recruitment. The selective A2AR agonist CGS21680 was challenged to A2ARSmBiT and LgBiT mini-Gαs expressing HEK-293T cells in the absence/presence of increasing concentrations of CBD or ZM241385. The luminescent signal obtained after reconstitution of the nanoluciferase was assessed by calculating the area under the curve for each condition. Data are shown as mean ± SEM of three independent experiments with five replicates. *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001, one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test. (c) cAMP accumulation was assessed on HEK-293T cells permanently expressing the A2ARNL. Cells were challenged with the selective A2AR agonist CGS21680 (100 nM, normalised to 100% of effect) in the absence/presence of increasing concentrations of CBD. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM of four independent experiments performed in triplicates. *P < 0.05, one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test. — Figure 2.Assessment of CBD effects on A_2AR intrinsic activity. (a) Schematic representation of the NanoBIT^™-based assay. The two fragments of nanoluciferase, small (SmBIT) and large (LgBIT), are fused to A_2AR and mini-Gαs protein, respectively. Then, upon agonist binding, A_2AR intrinsic activity is assessed by receptor recruitment of Gαs, which induces an increase on luminescence due to nanoluciferase reconstitution. **(b)** Representative time-course of A_2AR agonist-mediated Gαs recruitment. The selective A_2AR agonist CGS21680 was challenged to A_2AR^SmBiT and ^LgBiT mini-Gαs expressing HEK-293T cells in the absence/presence of increasing concentrations of CBD or ZM241385. The luminescent signal obtained after reconstitution of the nanoluciferase was assessed by calculating the area under the curve for each condition. Data are shown as mean ± SEM of three independent experiments with five replicates. *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001, one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s *post hoc* test. **(c)** cAMP accumulation was assessed on HEK-293T cells permanently expressing the A_2AR^NL. Cells were challenged with the selective A_2AR agonist CGS21680 (100 nM, normalised to 100% of effect) in the absence/presence of increasing concentrations of CBD. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM of four independent experiments performed in triplicates. *P < 0.05, one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s *post hoc* test.

Finally, to further characterise the effects of CBD on the intrinsic activity of A_2AR, we evaluated agonist-induced cAMP accumulation in cells permanently expressing the A_2AR^NL construct and challenged with CGS21680 in the presence/absence of CBD. Interestingly, although CBD itself did not modify cAMP levels, it was able to dose-dependently block CGS21680-induced cAMP levels (Fig. 2c). Again, differently from ZM241385, a full-antagonist, CBD partially blocked A_2AR agonist increase of cAMP levels. Overall, these results are compatible with the notion that CBD acts as a weak A_2AR negative allosteric modulator.

Discussion

CBD is a promising drug for several pathologies (ElSohly et al., 2017). Accordingly, unravelling its precise mechanism of action is relevant in the progress towards its clinical development. Here, we reveal that CBD does not affect the binding of an A_2AR orthosteric ligand, but it is capable of negatively modulating agonist-induced interaction with the Gαs protein at sub-micromolar concentrations (≥100 nM), thus reducing receptor signalling (i.e. cAMP generation). Therefore, we disclose a new non-competitive interaction of CBD with A_2AR.

The effect of CBD on A_2AR could operate through a new allosteric site at the receptor. However, further experiments (i.e. using labelled CBD) would be needed to confirm this hypothesis. On the other hand, we cannot rule out other mechanisms of action for CBD different from classical allosteric drugs. In this sense, previous evidence indicates that other lipids, including the endogenous cannabinoid anandamide at micromolar concentrations, might act as allosteric modulators of other GPCRs through a membrane-perturbing effect that is sensitive to receptor conformation (Lanzafame et al., 2004; Van der Westhuizen et al., 2015). Further studies are needed to assess this putative CBD-mediated membrane effect on A_2AR-Gαs protein coupling. Similarly, CBD could indirectly modify A_2AR functioning by interacting with equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (ENT1), as was previously demonstrated in striatal synaptosomes (Pandolfo et al., 2011). However, this hypothetical CBD effect on ENT seems not to play a relevant role in vivo, since a recent study demonstrated that CBD lacks the ability to substantially raise endogenous adenosine levels by using the hypothermia mouse model (Xiao et al., 2023). These discrepancies between in vitro and in vivo studies could be also explained by the fact that A_2AR can form heteromers with other GPCRs, including CB₁R (Carriba et al., 2007; Ferré et al., 2010; Aso et al., 2019), in physiological conditions different from that obtained in heterologous expression systems. The assembly of A_2AR-containing heteromers leads to changes in the agonist recognition, signalling, and trafficking, which might result in different A_2AR activity in the presence of CBD.

Although we evaluated the effects of CBD in cultured cells expressing A_2AR, these results could be relevant for many disorders in which A_2AR activity increases. For example, in certain inflammatory processes and cardiovascular diseases, but also in pathological conditions that affect the central nervous system, such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, fragile X syndrome, depression, or anxiety (Domenici et al., 2019). A_2ARs, which are widely expressed both in neurons and glia, are mainly found in the dorsal and ventral striatum and other nuclei of the basal ganglia, where they play a key role in the control of voluntary movements, as well as in motivational, emotional and cognitive processes (Sebastião and Ribeiro, 2009). In this way, A_2ARs are involved in regulating the release of neurotransmitters and contribute to the homeostatic control of synaptic transmission and brain function (Sebastião and Ribeiro, 2009). In general, our results are consistent with the positive effects reported for CBD in various brain disorders that can be associated with an exacerbated A_2AR function, where CBD would tone down A_2AR hyperactivity.

Overall, the present study provides evidence on the ability of CBD to negatively modulate A_2AR signalling. The CBD-mediated negative modulation of A_2AR function is restricted to the receptor-effector coupling and does not interfere with the binding of the orthosteric ligand. Accordingly, we provide a new and genuine pharmacological way to modulate the adenosinergic system in pathological conditions in which A_2AR function is increased.

Untitled section

Boxed Text

Significant outcomes

Cannabidiol does not bind orthosterically to A_2AR.
Cannabidiol reduces the functionality of A_2AR

Boxed Text

Limitations

This is an in vitro study, and results cannot be directly extrapolated to in vivo conditions.
Putative allosteric binding of CBD to A_2AR cannot be confirmed or ruled out with the luminescence-based techniques employed in this study.

Acknowledgements.

We thank Centres de Recerca de Catalunya Programme/Generalitat de Catalunya for IDIBELL institutional support and Maria de Maeztu MDM-2017-0729 to Institut de Neurociencies, Universitat de Barcelona. We are also grateful to the CannaLatan network members (CYTED-Programa Iberoamericano de Ciencia y Tecnología para el Desarrollo) for the fruitful discussion about the results.

Financial support.

This study was supported by Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades–Agencia Estatal de Investigación-FEDER funds/European Regional Development Fund – ‘a way to build Europe’ grant RTI2018-097773-A-I00 to EA and PID2020-118511RB-I00 to FC. Founded by MCIN/AEI /10.13039/501100011033 ‘ESF Investing in your future’ grant PRE2018–084480 to JA, grant PRE2019-088153 to NSF and grant FPU19/03142 to LGA. Also supported by ‘Acció instrumental de formació de científics i tecnòlegs’ (SLT017/20/000114) of the Departament de Salut de la Generalitat de Catalunya to LIS. The study was also supported by the Luxembourg Institute of Health (LIH), Luxembourg National Research Fund (INTER/FNRS grants 20/15084569 to AC) and the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases NIDDK Intramural Research Program (ZIADK031117 to KAJ).

Footnotes

Footnote Group

References

Untitled section

References

Aso E, Fernández-Dueñas V, López-Cano M, Taura J, Watanabe M, Ferrer I, Luján R and Ciruela F (2019) Adenosine A_2A-cannabinoid CB₁ receptor heteromers in the hippocampus: cannabidiol blunts Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol-induced cognitive impairment. Molecular Neurobiology 56(8), 5382–5391.
Carriba P, Ortiz O, Patkar K, Justinova Z, Stroik J, Themann A, Müller C, Woods AS, Hope BT, Ciruela F, Casadó V, Canela EI, Lluis C, Goldberg SR, Moratalla R, Franco R and Ferré S (2007) Striatal adenosine A_2A and cannabinoid CB₁ receptors form functional heteromeric complexes that mediate the motor effects of cannabinoids. Neuropsychopharmacology 32(11), 2249–2259.
ClinicalTrials.gov database. The National Library of Medicine. Available at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ (accessed 16 December 2022).
Devinsky O, Cilio MR, Cross H, Fernández-Ruiz J, French J, Hill C, Katz R, Di Marzo V, Jutras-Aswad D, Notcutt WG, Martínez-Orgado J, Robson PJ, Rohrback BG, Thiele E, Whalley B and Friedman D (2014) Cannabidiol: pharmacology and potential therapeutic role in epilepsy and other neuropsychiatric disorders. Epilepsia 55(6), 791–802.
Domenici MR, Ferrante A, Martire A, Chiodi V, Pepponi R, Tebano MT and Popoli P (2019) Adenosine A_2A receptor as potential therapeutic target in neuropsychiatric disorders. Pharmacological Research 147, 104338.
Duroux R, Ciancetta A, Mannes P, Yu J, Boyapati S, Gizewski E, Yous S, Ciruela F, Auchampach JA, Gao ZG and Jacobson KA (2017) Bitopic fluorescent antagonists of the A_2A adenosine receptor based on pyrazolo [4,3-: E] [1,2,4]triazolo[1,5- c] pyrimidin-5-amine functionalized congeners. Medicinal Chemistry Communications 8(8), 1659–1667.
ElSohly MA, Radwan MM, Gul W, Chandra S and Galal A (2017) Phytochemistry of Cannabis sativa L. In Kinghorn AD, Falk H, Gibbons S and Kobayashi) J (ed), Phytocannabinoids: unraveling the complex chemistry and pharmacology of Cannabis sativa. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, pp. 1–36.
Ferré S, Lluís C, Justinova Z, Quiroz C, Orru M, Navarro G, Canela EI, Franco R and Goldberg SR (2010) Adenosine-cannabinoid receptor interactions. Implications for striatal function. British Journal Pharmacology 160(3), 443–453.
Lanzafame A, Guida E and Christopoulos A (2004) Effects of anandamide on the binding and signaling properties of M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. Biochemical Pharmacology 68(11), 2207–2219.
Lanznaster D, Massari CM, Marková V, Šimková T, Duroux R, Jacobson KA, Fernández-Dueñas V, Tasca CI and Ciruela F (2019) Adenosine A1-A2A receptor-receptor interaction: contribution to guanosine-mediated effects. Cells 8(12), 1630.
Liou GI, Auchampach JA, Hillard CJ, Zhu G, Yousufzai B, Mian S, Khan S and Khalifa Y (2008) Mediation of cannabidiol anti-inflammation in the retina by equilibrative nucleoside transporter and A_2A adenosine receptor. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 49(12), 5526–5531.
Longo PA, Kavran JM, Kim MS and Leahy DJ (2013) Transient mammalian cell transfection with polyethylenimine (PEI). Methods Enzymology 529, 227–240.
McPartland JM, Duncan M, Di Marzo V and Pertwee RG (2015) Are cannabidiol and Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabivarin negative modulators of the endocannabinoid system? A systematic review. British Journal Pharmacology 172(3), 737–753.
Mecha M, Feliú A, Iñigo PM, Mestre L, Carrillo-Salinas FJ and Guaza C (2013) Cannabidiol provides long-lasting protection against the deleterious effects of inflammation in a viral model of multiple sclerosis: a role for A_2A receptors. Neurobiology Disease 59, 141–150.
Meyrath M, Palmer CB, Reynders N, Vanderplasschen A, Ollert M, Bouvier M, Szpakowska M and Chevigné A (2021) Proadrenomedullin N-terminal 20 peptides (PAMPs) are agonists of the chemokine scavenger receptor ACKR3/CXCR7. ACS Pharmacology Translational Science 4(2), 813–823.
Motulsky HJ, Brown RE (2006) Detecting outliers when fitting data with nonlinear regression - a new method based on robust nonlinear regression and the false discovery rate. BMC Bioinformatics 7, 123.
Oláh A, Tóth BI, Borbíró I, Sugawara K, Szöllõsi AG, Czifra G, Pál B, Ambrus L, Kloepper J, Camera E, Ludovici M, Picardo M, Voets T, Zouboulis CC, Paus R and Bíró T (2014) Cannabidiol exerts sebostatic and antiinflammatory effects on human sebocytes. Journal Clinical Investigation 124(9), 3713–3724.
Pacher P, Kogan NM and Mechoulam R (2020) Beyond THC and endocannabinoids. Annual Review Pharmacology Toxicology 60, 637–659.
Pandolfo P, Silveirinha V, dos Santos-Rodrigues A, Venance L, Ledent C, Takahashi RN, Cunha RA and Köfalvi A (2011) Cannabinoids inhibit the synaptic uptake of adenosine and dopamine in the rat and mouse striatum. European Journal Pharmacology 655(1–3), 38–45.
Ribeiro A, Ferraz-de-Paula V, Pinheiro ML, Vitoretti LB, Mariano-Souza DP, Quinteiro-Filho WM, Akamine AT, Almeida VI, Quevedo J, Dal-Pizzol F, Hallak JE, Zuardi AW, Crippa JA and Palermo-Neto J. (2012) Cannabidiol, a non-psychotropic plant-derived cannabinoid, decreases inflammation in a murine model of acute lung injury: role for the adenosine A_2A receptor. European Journal Pharmacology 678(1–3), 78–85.
Ryberg E, Larsson N, Sjögren S, Hjorth S, Hermansson NO, Leonova J, Elebring T, Nilsson K, Drmota T and Greasley PJ (2007) The orphan receptor GPR55 is a novel cannabinoid receptor. British Journal Pharmacology 152(7), 1092–1101.
Sarasola LI, Del Torrent CL, Pérez-Arévalo A, Argerich J, Casajuana-Martín N, Chevigné A, Fernández-Dueñas V, Ferré S, Pardo L and Ciruela F (2022) The ADORA1 mutation linked to early-onset Parkinson’s disease alters adenosine A₁-A_2A receptor heteromer formation and function. Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy 156, 113896.
Sebastião AM, Ribeiro JA (2009) Adenosine receptors and the central nervous system. Handbook Experimental Pharmacology 193, 471–534.
Stollenwerk TM, Pollock S and Hillard CJ (2021) Contribution of the adenosine 2A receptor to behavioral effects of tetrahydrocannabinol, cannabidiol and PECS-101. Molecules 26(17), 5354.
Sylantyev S, Jensen TP, Ross RA and Rusakov DA (2013) Cannabinoid- and lysophosphatidylinositol-sensitive receptor GPR55 boosts neurotransmitter release at central synapses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110(13), 5193–5198.
Van der Westhuizen ET, Valant C, Sexton MC and Christopoulos A (2015) Endogenous allosteric modulators of G protein-coupled receptors. Journal Pharmacology Experimental Therapeutics 353(2), 246–260.
Wan Q, Okashah N, Inoue A, Nehmé R, Carpenter B, Tate CG and Lambert NA (2018) Mini G protein probes for active G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) in live cells. Journal Biological Chemistry 293(19), 7466–7473.
Xiao C, Gavrilova O, Liu N, Lewicki SA, Reitman ML and Jacobson KA (2023) In vivo phenotypic validation of adenosine receptor-dependent activity of non-adenosine drugs. Purinergic Signal (in press).

Studies

Conditions

Cannabinoids and active compounds

Related research

Abstract

Objectives:

Methods:

Results:

Conclusion:

Untitled section

Article notes

Untitled section

Author notes

Introduction

Materials and methods

Reagents

Plasmid constructs

Cell culture and transfection

NanoBRET experiments

NanoBiT assay

cAMP assay

Statistics

Results

Discussion

Untitled section

Boxed Text

Boxed Text

Acknowledgements.

Financial support.

Footnotes

Footnote Group

References

Untitled section

References

Additional materials