Cannabinoids in the Treatment of Epilepsy: Hard Evidence at Last?

Abstract

The interest in cannabis-based products for the treatment of refractory epilepsy has skyrocketed in recent years. Marijuana and other cannabis products with high content in Δ(9) - tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), utilized primarily for recreational purposes, are generally unsuitable for this indication, primarily because THC is associated with many undesired effects. Compared with THC, cannabidiol (CBD) shows a better defined anticonvulsant profile in animal models and is largely devoid of adverse psychoactive effects and abuse liability. Over the years, this has led to an increasing use of CBD-enriched extracts in seizure disorders, particularly in children. Although improvement in seizure control and other benefits on sleep and behavior have been often reported, interpretation of the data is made difficult by the uncontrolled nature of these observations. Evidence concerning the potential anti-seizure efficacy of cannabinoids reached a turning point in the last 12 months, with the completion of three high-quality placebo-controlled adjunctive-therapy trials of a purified CBD product in patients with Dravet syndrome and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. In these studies, CBD was found to be superior to placebo in reducing the frequency of convulsive (tonic-clonic, tonic, clonic, and atonic) seizures in patients with Dravet syndrome, and the frequency of drop seizures in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. For the first time, there is now class 1 evidence that adjunctive use of CBD improves seizure control in patients with specific epilepsy syndromes. Based on currently available information, however, it is unclear whether the improved seizure control described in these trials was related to a direct action of CBD, or was mediated by drug interactions with concomitant medications, particularly a marked increased in plasma levels of N-desmethylclobazam, the active metabolite of clobazam. Clarification of the relative contribution of CBD to improved seizure outcome requires re-assessment of trial data for the subgroup of patients not comedicated with clobazam, or the conduction of further studies controlling for the confounding effect of this interaction.

Untitled section

Keywords: Cannabis, Cannabidiol, Epilepsy, Seizures, Review

Article notes

Untitled section

Received 2017 Jul 11; Accepted 2017 Sep 25; Collection date 2017 Dec.

Author notes

Introduction

The history of human use of the Cannabis plant goes back to the dawn of mankind. The plant, which originated in Central Asia or in the foothills of the Himalayas, was initially cultivated in China for fiber and seed production, and in India for resin production.1 For many centuries, European and East Asian societies have used mostly Cannabis strains containing low amounts (< 1% dry weight) of the psychoactive principle 9-Δ-tetrahydrocannabidiol (THC), and their main utilization was for fiber and food. Conversely, African, Middle-Eastern, South Asian, and Southeast Asian societies have used cannabis primarily for its psychoactive properties, with strains from these regions often containing 5–10% THC.1

The first studies on the medical use of cannabis date back to the Chinese Emperor Shen Nung (about 2,700 B.C.).2 As evidence of the important role of the plant in ancient Chinese culture, archeological excavations in the Xinjiang-Uighur Autonomous Region of China have recently unearthed a 2,700-year-old grave of a shaman which contained a large cache of cannabis, perfectly preserved by climatic and burial conditions, presumably employed as a medicinal or psychoactive agent, or as an aid to divination.3 Early written records of medical applications can be traced to Sumerian and Akkadian tablets, around 1,800 B.C., which mention the use of a medicinal plant, most likely cannabis, to treat a variety of ailments, including nocturnal convulsions.2,4 In less ancient times, there are records in the Arabic and Islamic literature which mention explicitly cannabis as a treatment for seizures and epilepsy.4

The first detailed modern description of the utility of cannabis-based products as an anti-seizure medication was published in 1843 by W.B. O’Shaughnessy, physician in the Bengal Army and Late Professor of Chemistry and Materia Medica at the Medical College of Calcutta. After testing the behavioral effects of various preparations of Cannabis indica in healthy fish, dogs, swines, vultures, crows, horses, deers, monkeys, goats, sheep, cows, and military assistants, he investigated the potential value of extracts of the plant in patients with different disorders, and reported remarkable anti-seizure effects in a 40-days-old baby girl with recurrent convulsive seizures.5 These observations were taken up by other physicians, including Sir William Gowers, who described the effectiveness of Cannabis indica against seizures resistant to bromides.6

In the twentieth century the use of cannabis declined somewhat because cultivation of the plant was made illegal in many countries. However, scientific advances on the properties of the plant progressed as chemists and pharmacologists started on work on the chemical characterization of its active ingredients, and on the relationship between their molecular structure and biological activity. While various reports focused on the effects of smoked cannabis on seizure control, it soon became clear that the psychoactive effects of THC limited the applicability of crude cannabis preparations in the treatment of seizures, and attention shifted to the potential utility of non-psychoactive ingredients such cannabidiol (CBD).2 Although interest in ‘medical marijuana’ and its individual constituents for the treatment of seizures persisted through the years, it is only in the last decade that preclinical and clinical research into the potential application of cannabis in the treatment of epilepsy has literally exploded (Fig. 1). The purpose of the present article is to review the pharmacological basis of the anti-seizure effects of cannabis and particularly its non-psychoactive constituents, and to discuss critically the expanding range of evidence on the efficacy of these compounds in the management of different seizure types and epilepsy syndromes.

Figure 1Number of articles retrieved in PubMed by using the search terms ‘cannabis and epilepsy’, grouped by year of publication.

Chemistry and mechanisms of action

The genus Cannabis refers to a flowering plant of which there are three main species, Cannabis sativa, Cannabis indica and Cannabis ruderalis. These plants contain over 100 biologically active chemicals called cannabinoids, with the most abundant and best characterized among those being THC and CBD (Fig. 2).7 Crude preparations of cannabis include dried leaves, stems and flower pods (marijuana), resins (hashish), and oily extracts (hashish oil), all of which have been used through the centuries mostly for their psychoactive properties. In general, cannabis products derived from Cannabis sativa exhibit a higher CBD/THC ratio than products derived from Cannabis indica. Different Cannabis strains have been bred either to maximize THC content or, conversely, to reduce THC content and increase the concentration of CBD and other non-psychoactive ingredients.8

Figure 2Chemical structure of cannabidiol and 9-Δ-tetrahydrocannabinol.

Many biological actions of cannabinoids are mediated by their interaction with two closely related receptors, cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1) and 2 (CB2), although a variety of other receptors and targets are also involved in the effects of these compounds.9–13 Both the CB1 and the CB2 receptors belong to the class of G_i/o-coupled metabotropic receptors and are widely distributed throughout the central nervous system (CNS), with CB1 receptors being localized primarily in neurons and CB2 receptors being expressed in microglia and, to a greater extent, in the immune system.9 The discovery of cannabinoid receptors in the CNS led to a search for endogenous substances interacting with these receptors and to the identification of so-called ‘endogenous cannabinoids’, the most important of which are the arachidonic acid derivatives anandamide (2-arachido-noylethanolamide) and 2-arachidonoyl glycerol.9 Extensive evidence has now accumulated that endocannabinoids play an important role in the control in synaptic transmission and the regulation of the rate of neuronal firing.13–17 In the CNS, CB1 receptors are expressed pre-synaptically on both glutamatergic and GABAergic interneurons, and activation of these receptors results in inhibition of synaptic transmission, including glutamate release.9,10,16 An involvement of endo-cannabinoid signaling pathways in the pathophysiology of epilepsy (and the possibility of targeting these pathways for therapeutic purposes) is suggested by a number of experimental and clinical observations. Experimentally, many studies reviewed in recent articles10,14,16,17 have demonstrated that endogenous cannabinoids systems are altered in a variety of models of seizures, epilepsy and epileptogenesis, whereas external modulation of these systems can prevent or modulate seizure activity. Clinically, observations implicating a role of endocannabinoid systems in epilepsy include the finding of reduced anandamide concentrations in the cerebrospinal fluid of individuals with new-onset temporal lobe epilepsy;18 demonstration of downregulation of CB1 receptors and related molecular components in glutamatergic neurons from surgical samples of epileptic human hippocampus;19 demonstration of sprouting of CB1-receptor expressing GABAergic axons (or increased expression of CB1-receptors on these fibers) in sclerotic human hippocampi;20 and PET evidence of differential changes in CB1 receptor availability in the seizure onset zone and in the insula of patients with temporal lobe epilepsy and hippocampal sclerosis.21

Cannabinoids have numerous and complex pharmacological properties. In experimental models, for example, THC displays complex psychoactive effects, variable anticonvulsant effects, and analgesic, cognitive, muscle relaxant, anti-inflammatory, appetite stimulant, and antiemetic activity.9,12,22 On the other hand, CBD is mostly devoid of adverse psychoactive effects and possesses anticonvulsant, analgesic, anti-anxiety, antiemetic, immune-modulating, anti-inflammatory, neuroprotectant, and anti-tumorigenic properties.9,12,22 In the case of THC, anti-seizure activity seems to be mediated to an important extent by its partial agonist action on the CB1 receptor, which is also primarily involved in the expression of psychoactive effects.9,13,23 CBD, on the other hand, has very weak affinity for the CB1 and CB2 receptors and its anti-seizure activity at clinically relevant concentrations is considered to be mediated by other mechanisms,13,24,25 possibly including functional agonism or antagonism at multiple 7-transmembrane receptors, ion channels, and neurotransmitter transporters (Table 1).24–35 In particular, an effect on adenosine reuptake and antagonism of G protein-coupled receptor 55 (GPR55) have been recently suggested to play an important role in CBD anti-seizure activity.36

Table 1A list of targets and actions reported for CBD based on results of studies in different experimental models and systems24–36

Receptor/target	Action of CBD at the indicated receptor/target
CB1	Non-competitive antagonist
CB2	Inverse agonist
TRPV1–3	Agonist
TRPV4	Agonist
TRPM8	Antagonist
TRPA1	Agonist
α1, α 3 glycine	Agonist
5-HT_1a	Agonist
GPR55	Antagonist
PPAR-γ	Agonist
TNFα	Modulator
Voltage-gated T-type calcium channels	Antagonist
Resurgent sodium current	Inhibition
VDAC1	Modulator
Adenosine reuptake	Inhibitor
Adenosine A₁ and A₂ receptors	Modulator
Anandamide reuptake	Inhibitor
Fatty acid amide hydrolase	Inhibitor

Pharmacological profile in experimental models of seizures and epilepsy

Among the many active principles found in the cannabis plant, THC is the most widely investigated for its many actions, including its psychoactive effects and risks associated with overdose and abuse. THC shows some anticonvulsant effects in certain seizure models, but there have also been studies suggesting a proconvulsant effect.14,37 Although it is plausible that THC may contribute to the anti-seizure activity reported for medical marijuana and other cannabis preparations, its adverse psychotropic properties37 and inconsistent activity in seizure models render it undesirable for development for the treatment of epilepsy.38 Therefore, most cannabinoid research efforts in epilepsy have focused on the characterization of non-psycho-active agents, particularly CBD and cannabidivarin (CBDV), and the present review will focus especially on these compounds.

CBD

In preclinical studies, CBD has been found to be active in a variety of seizures models, including seizures induced by maximal electro-shock39–41 and by pentylentetrazole in rats and mice,42–44 audiogenic seizures in rats45 and seizures induced by 3-mercaptopropionic acid, bicuculline, picrotoxin, cocaine and isoniazid (but not strychnine) in mice.39,45,46 In addition, CBD shows protective activity in pilocarpine models of temporal lobe seizures and in the penicillin and cobalt models of focal seizures in rats,47–49 and increases the afterdischarge threshold while reducing afterdischarge amplitude and duration in electrically evoked kindled seizures in rats.50 CBD also inhibits epileptiform potentials induced by a Mg²⁺-free medium and 4-amino-pyridine in hippocampal brain slices.42

Recently, the anticonvulsant profile of CBD was re-evaluated using a refocused screening protocol developed by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)-funded Epilepsy Therapy Screening Program.41 In this investigation, CBD given intra-peritoneally (i.p.) produced a dose-dependent protection against maximal electroshock-induced seizures in mice (ED₅₀ 83.5 mg/kg) and rats (ED₅₀ 88.9 mg/kg), and was also found to be effective in the 6 Hz 44 mA seizure model (ED₅₀ 164 mg/kg), and in the corneal kindling model (ED₅₀ 119 mg/kg) in mice. These effects were observed at doses that did not cause motor impairment. No protection, however, was attained in the lamotrigine-resistant amygdala kindled rat at doses up to 300 mg/kg.

As discussed above, the molecular actions involved in CBD anti-seizure activity do not appear to be mediated by a direct effect on cannabinoid receptors, but the precise mechanisms of action have not been ascertained. In various studies, CBD has been reported to exhibit a range of other activities which suggest potential utility in many other conditions, including anxiety, mood disorders, psychosis, fear, trauma-related conditions, tobacco and opioid addition, inflammatory diseases, neurodegenerative disorders, and as a tool to counteract the undesired psychotropic effects of THC.32,51–56

CBDV

CBDV, another cannabinoid present in the cannabis plant, has been the focus of many recent studies. Like CBD, CBDV is virtually devoid of psychoactive effects and shows protecting activity in vitro against epileptiform potentials induced by 4-aminopyridine and Mg²⁺- free conditions in rat hippocampal slices and, in vivo, against seizures induced by maximal electroshock, pentylentetrazole, and audiogenic stimulation.57 In an early study, CBDV was not found to protect against pilocarpine-induced seizures at doses up to 200 mg/kg i.p., but potentiated the effect of valproic acid and phenobarbital in this model.57 In a subsequent study by the same group, however, inhibition of pilocarpine-induced seizures was observed after administration of a CBDV-rich cannabis extract.58 The mechanisms responsible for the anti-seizure effects of CBDV do not seem to involve an action on cannabinoid receptors.25,29 Like CBD, CBDV acts as an agonist for the transient receptor potential (TRP) channels TRPV1, TRPV2, TRPA1, and as an antagonist for TRPM8.28,30,59 These actions, however, have been considered unlikely to contribute to its anticonvulsant activity.29,36 CBDV also inhibits diacylglycerol lipase α, the primary enzyme involved in the synthesis of 2-arachidonoylglycerol.28 Again, the potential contribution of this effect to its anticonvulsant activity has not been established.

9-Δ-tetrahydrocannabinolinic acid

In the cannabis plant, most cannabinoids are synthesized in their acidic form. These acidic cannabinoids undergo decarboxylation to their neutral counterparts (e.g., CBD and THC) under the influence of auto-oxidation, light and heat. In most common extraction and delivery methods, plant materials are exposed to heat, resulting in the conversion of the acidic forms to the neutral constituents.60 However, some cannabis products may retain some content in acidic cannabinoids, particularly cannabidiolic acid (CBDA) and 9-Δ-tetrahydrocannabinolinic acid (THCA). THCA has been found to possess anticonvulsant activity in preliminary preclinical investigations, and be devoid of adverse psychoactive effects.61 Interest in THCA been rekindled recently by the fact that it is sometimes used for anti-seizure purposes in the USA, where it can be more readily available and/or affordable than CBD. One specific concern is that accidental exposure to heat of artisanal THCA preparations may result in partial conversion to THC.61

Pharmacokinetics and drug interactions

CBD

Following administration to healthy subjects of a single 400 mg oral dose encapsulated in gelatin capsules, CBD was found to be rapidly absorbed, with mean peak plasma concentrations of 114 to 181 ng/mL being attained at about 1.5 to 3 hours.62 Following oral administration, CBD shows a high interindividual pharmacokinetic variability. Its oral bioavailability is low, in the order of 6%37 or 10%,63 due in part to extensive first-pass metabolism.37 Bioavailability appears to be higher (in the range of 11 to 45%) after inhalation in cannabis smokers.64 In a study conducted with an oromucosal spray of nabiximols (a formulation containing THC and CBD in an approximately 1:1 ratio, which is approved in some countries for the treatment of symptoms of spasticity associated with multiple sclerosis), co-administration with food resulted in a mean 5-fold increase in CBD bioavailability.65 It is unclear whether a similar effect also occurs with oral formulations.

CBD is highly bound to plasma proteins (> 99%)63 and is extensively metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes, particularly CYP3A4 and CYP2C19,66 and glucuronyltransferases.67 The major metabolic pathway involves hydroxylation and oxidation at C-7, followed by further hydroxylation in the pentyl and propenyl groups.68 The major oxidized metabolite identified is cannabidiol-7-oic acid containing a hydroxyethyl side chain. The elimination of CBD follows a biphasic pattern, with an initial half-life of about 6 hours which partly reflects distributive processes. Because of its very high lipophilic properties, CBD distributes extensively into tissues, from which it is slowly released, resulting in a late-phase terminal half-life of about 24 hours.63 In a safety and pharmacokinetic study in patients with Dravet syndrome, 27 children aged 4 to 10 years received CBD doses of 5, 10 or 20 mg/kg/day in addition to pre-existing antiepileptic drugs (AEDs).69 On treatment day 22, exposures to CBD and its major metabolites were found to increase dose-proportionally.

The clearance of CBD has been reported to be increased after co-administration with the enzyme inducer rifampicin.70 It would be expected that enzyme inducing AEDs such as carbamazepine and phenytoin also accelerate CBD metabolism and reduce CBD levels at steady state. Conversely, CBD levels have been found to be increased by the CYP3A4 inhibitor ketoconazole, but not by the CYP2C19 inhibitor omeprazole.70

In studies conducted on liver isozymes, CBD has been shown to inhibit the activity of CYP1A1, CYP1A2, CYP1B1, CYP2D6, CYP3A4, and CYP2C19 enzymes.71–75 There is also evidence of CBD acting as an inhibitor of transporter systems, such as BCRP and the ABC transporter multidrug resistance-related protein 1.67 Some of these in vitro effects occur at concentrations above those found within the clinically used dose range. However, at least one clinically important interaction mediated by inhibition of drug metabolism has been reported. In a group of 13 patients with epilepsy aged 4 to 19 years, addition of CBD (initial dose 5 mg/kg/day, titrated up to a target dose of 25 mg/kg/day) resulted in an increase in the plasma levels of concomitantly administered clobazam by 60 ± 80% (mean ± standard deviation). More importantly, the plasma concentration of the active metabolite of clobazam, N-desmethylclobazam, increased by 500 ± 300% (95% confidence interval [CI]: +90 to +610%) at 4 weeks after starting CBD.76 Ten of the 13 patients experienced side effects, most commonly drowsiness, which resolved after lowering the clobazam dose. This interaction, which was considered to be mediated by inhibition of CYP2C19, is particularly relevant because clobazam is frequently used in epileptic encephalopathies for which CBD appears to be a promising new treatment. In a safety and pharmacokinetic study in children with Dravet syndrome, there were minimal changes in clobazam levels, but concentrations of N-desmethyl clobazam increased independently of CBD dose, except for patients on stiripentol in whom N-desmethyl-clobazam levels appeared to be unaffected by CBD.69 There were no demonstrable effects on other AEDs (valproic acid, topiramate, stiripentol, levetiracetam).69 Serum levels of concomitant AEDs were also measured in another study which assessed 39 adults and 42 children started on CBD at a dose of 5 mg/kg/day, increased according to clinical response up to a maximum of 50 mg/kg/day.77 In the latter study, increases in the levels of N-desmethyl-clobazam, topiramate, and rufinamide were reported with increasing CBD doses. In adults, there were also increases in serum levels of zonisamide and eslicarbazepine. The results of this study are difficult to interpret, because of the confounding effects of changes in the dose of comedications. Serum clobazam levels, for example, decreased during CBD coadministration, primarily due to a reduction in clobazam dose. In any case, assessment of the data suggested that changes in serum levels of concomitant AEDs during CBD administration were generally minor, with the exception of clobazam and N-desmethylclobazam levels.77 In fact, occurrence of sedation as a result of the interaction with clobazam often led to a decrease in clobazam dose.

CBD may also be involved in pharmacodynamic interactions, i.e. interactions which occur at the site of action. In particular, acutely administered CBD may antagonize some of the effects of THC at CB1 receptor sites,78–80 an observation which may explain why patients taking marijuana with higher CBD content are less likely to develop adverse THC-related psychotropic symptoms, and may tolerate high-ecr THC doses.37,81 Studies in animal models, however, suggest that after prolonged exposure molecular interactions between CBD and THC may be more complex than previously thought, and may involve superadditive effects on some measures.82 Terpenoids contained in cannabis extracts may also interact with the action of CBD and other cannabinoids.83

The observation has been made that elevations in liver enzymes associated with CBD treatment occur much more frequently among patients comedicated with valproate than among patients comedicated with other AEDs.77,84–86 It is unclear whether the mechanism underlying this interaction is pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic in nature.87

CBDV

The pharmacokinetics of CBDV have not been reported in detail. In a recently completed Phase I study, healthy subjects were given single oral doses ranging between 25 and 800 mg, as well as multiple doses of 800 mg once daily over 5 days.36 Peak plasma concentrations and areas under the plasma concentration-time curve were found to be dose proportional. The 7-hydroxy- and 6-hydroxy-metabolites could be detected shortly after dosing.

Clinical evidence of efficacy and safety: exploratory studies

Marijuana and oral cannabis extracts

As discussed in the introductory section of this article, evidence of cannabis being used in the treatment of seizure disorders dates back thousands of years, and cannabis preparations had a role in the treatment of epilepsy by neurologists in the late nineteenth century. Although use of cannabis in epilepsy declined in the twentieth century due to legal restrictions and the gradual introduction of AEDs, observations suggesting anti-seizure activity continued to be reported. In 1975, Consroe et al.88 described a 24-year-old patient with seizures uncontrolled despite therapy with phenobarbital and phenytoin, who became seizure-free after starting to smoke marijuana. A few other reports suggestive of beneficial effects on seizures of marijuana smoking appeared in the subsequent decades,89–92 including an interesting epidemiological study which found a reduced risk of a first seizure among illicit cannabis users.93 There have been however, also reports of marijuana smoking precipitating or aggravating seizures.94,95

For medicinal use, oral intake provides a more easily controllable route of drug delivery than inhalation. Therefore, particularly during the last twenty years, users of cannabis for seizure control have generally preferred oral preparations. At the same time, increasing realization that CBD is superior to THC in safety and potential anti-seizure activity has resulted in preferential use of whole plant preparations or cannabis-based oil or liquid extracts enriched in CBD content. A number of such products are accessible in many countries and states under widely different legal and regulatory scenarios.87,96 In some settings, users obtain their cannabis from local growers, purchase it online or they grow the plant and process the product themselves.61 Therefore, it is not surprising that many preparations lack adequate quality validation, and that some marketed products when tested are found to have contents of individual cannabinoids wildly different from those stated in their label,97,98 and some may even contain potentially harmful contaminants.99 This situation raises concerns about consistency in dosing and risk of adverse effects, including toxic effects resulting from psychoactive constituents such as THC. In this regard, a recent report described two children with manifestations suggestive of THC intoxication, including seizure exacerbation, in whom clinical symptoms remitted after switching their treatment from a CBD-enriched edible cannabis preparation to a formulation of purified CBD.100 In some countries, well standardized products are accessible, which typically differ in their relative content of CBD and THC. In Israel, for example, available medical cannabis products approved for epilepsy have standardized CBD/THC ratios of 2:1, 5:1, and 20:1, with the latter being the preparation most commonly used.101

Evidence about the efficacy and safety of oral cannabis preparations is mostly based on surveys and case reports, including the widely publicized story of Charlotte, a little girl with SCN1A-confirmed Dravet syndrome, who experienced a remarkable improvement in her seizures after being switched to a CBD-enriched extract.102 One of the first surveys targeted a Facebook group of approximately 150 parents in the USA supporting the use of CBD-enriched cannabis in their children with drug refractory seizures.103 There were only 19 respondents, with most of the children having a diagnosis of Dravet syndrome and Doose syndrome. Over 80% of parents in this small and possibly biased sample considered their child to have fewer seizures while on CBD-enriched cannabis, at estimated doses up to 25 mg/kg/day for CBD and up to 0.8 mg/kg/day for THC. Two children were free from seizures. Parents also reported other beneficial effects, including improved alertness, and improved mood and sleep. Side effects included drowsiness and fatigue. Another online survey was directed to parents who used CBD-enriched cannabis products for the treatment of their children’s epilepsy.104 There were 117 respondents (including parents of 53 children with infantile spasms and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome), with 85% reporting a reduction in seizure frequency in their children, and 14% reporting complete seizure freedom. The median duration of therapy was 6.8 months, and the median estimated CBD dosage was 4.3 mg/kg/day. Many responders reported that their children showed improved sleep, alertness and mood. In a very recent web-based survey from Australia targeting people with epilepsy nationwide, 137 of the 976 respondents reported to be using, or having previously used, cannabis products for the treatment of their seizures.105 Use of these products increased with increasing number of AEDs used in the past, suggesting that patients with the most drug resistant seizures were more likely to access cannabis therapy. Products were perceived as helpful in managing seizures in 71% of children and 89.5% of adults, and almost one half of respondents reported to have been able to reduce their concomitant AEDs. Interestingly, only 6.5% of responders stated that they used cannabis because it was recommended by their physician, and the majority of the products used were obtained from illegal suppliers, without knowledge of their precise composition. Positive results with cannabis use were also reported in another recent online survey directed to parents of children with refractory epilepsy in Mexico.106

In addition to web-based surveys, there have several reports based on chart reviews. In one such report from the USA, use of artisanal cannabis in 272 children and adults with a variety of seizure types was associated with at least 50% seizure reduction in 55% of cases, with 10% achieving seizure freedom, and there was no indication of improvement being preferentially associated with a specific seizure type or syndrome.61 In a retrospective survey of 75 children and adolescents with refractory epilepsy from Colorado, where use marijuana for medical purposes was legalized in 2,000, one third of patients experienced a > 50% seizure reduction after starting therapy with oral cannabis, with the highest apparent benefit being reported in those with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome.107 Adverse events were reported in almost one half of the cases and included increased seizures (13%) and somnolence/fatigue (12%), but there were also reports of improved alertness or behavior in one third of the cases. Comparable findings were reported in a similar report from Colorado, which included data from 119 patients (it is unclear whether this population partly overlapped with that described in the earlier report by the same group).108 In the latter study, the proportion of patients who showed >50% seizure reduction was 24% and, interestingly, one third of those who did not report any seizure improvement continued to take cannabis therapy, presumably because of other perceived benefits. The average duration of cannabis use in this cohort was 11.7 months (range 0.3 to 57 months) and overall 71% of patients discontinued cannabis therapy during the study period. Another report from Israel included 74 patients with highly drug resistant epilepsies secondary to various etiologies (mostly epileptic encephalopathies), treated with a CBD dose of 1 to 20 mg/kg/day using an oil product containing CBD and THC in a 20:1 ratio.109 Almost 90% of the patients were cognitively impaired and one half were less than 10 years of age. Unlike other studies, therapy in the Israeli setting was generally prescribed by a physician, and the fact that 81% of the patients received relatively low doses (less than 10 mg/kg/day) was attributed to the fact that most patients kept the oil drops sublingually for several minutes, which would be expected to result in higher bioavailability.102 About one half of the patients reported at least a 50% reduction of their seizures, but five reported seizure aggravation leading to treatment withdrawal. As in previous reports, many patients reported improvements in behavior, alertness, language, communication, motor skills and sleep. Thirty-four (45%) patients reported adverse events, including somnolence/fatigue (22%), seizure aggravation (18%), gastrointestinal symptoms and irritability (7%).

Overall, review of the available studies suggests that CBD-enriched cannabis may have anti-seizure effects, but the quality of the evidence does not allow to draw firm conclusions. Studies were generally retrospective, and based on patient or parenteral reports without adequately structured data collection. Many of the patients surveyed used unspecified products whose composition and dosage was unknown. Moreover, estimates of apparent efficacy could be affected by patients’ selection bias, reporting bias, and other confounders such as the natural course of the disease, regression to the mean phenomena, and placebo effects.110 In particular, placebo effects are known to be strongly influenced by expectations,111 and the broad media exposure associated with cannabis products is a strong generator of positive expectations. An indication that patient or parental expectations may have a strong impact on the outcome of cannabis treatment is provided by a comparison of perceived improvement among patients included in the Colorado surveys.107,108 Specifically, outcomes of cannabis therapy were significantly better when families moved their residence to Colorado in order to access the medication compared with families already residing in Colorado (Fig. 3). Although there could be alternative explanations for this finding, it is plausible that patients with high expectations/motivations, leading them to relocate to another state, were those who responded best.

Figure 3Proportion of patients reporting beneficial anti-seizure effects from cannabis products in relation to whether patients’ family resided originally in Colorado or moved to Colorado in order to access cannabis therapy.108

Purified cannabidiol

The first studies of pure CBD in the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy date back to the late 70s and the 80s and explored oral doses in the range of 200 to 300 mg/day.112–115 Despite the fact that all four studies included placebo as a control, only one trial was truly double-blind, the largest sample size was only 15 patients, critical details were lacking, and there were other methodological shortcomings.37 These trials were evaluated in a Cochrane review which included a systematic literature search up to September 2013, and the conclusion was reached that ‘no reliable conclusions can be drawn at present regarding the efficacy of cannabinoids as a treatment for epilepsy’.116 Similar conclusions were reached in a 2014 report of the Guideline Development Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.117

To date, the largest exploratory study of the tolerability and anti-seizure activity of CBD relates to a recent physician-sponsored expanded-access programme at 11 epilepsy centres in the USA.84 A total of 214 patients aged 1–30 years with severe, childhood-onset, drug resistant epilepsy received an oil-based liquid formulation of 99% pure CBD at an initial dose of 2–5 mg/kg/day, up-titrated until intolerance or to a maximum dose of 25 mg/kg or 50 mg/kg per day, depending on study site. Tolerability and safety were analysed for the group of 162 patients who achieved at least 12 weeks of follow-up–this included 33 patients with Dravet syndrome and 31 patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. In this group, adverse events were reported in 128 (79%) patients, the most common being somnolence (25%), decreased appetite (19%), diarrhea (19%), fatigue (13%), and convulsion (11%). Adverse events leading to discontinuation of treatment occurred in 5 patients (3%). An explorative assessment of efficacy was performed in a subgroup of 137 patients, after excluding patients with less than 12-week follow-up (n = 52), patients with no motor seizures (n = 21), and patients who were aged less than one year or had a severe progressive metabolic disease (n = 3). In those 137 patients, there was a median 35% decrease in total seizures, with the greatest seizure reduction being recorded in patients with focal seizures (−55%, n = 42) and atonic seizures (−54%, n = 32). Nine patients (7%) were free from all seizures during the last 4 weeks of follow-up. It is of interest that a reduction in motor seizures by 50% or greater was observed in 51% of patients comedicated with clobazam (n = 70), compared with 27% of those not receiving clobazam (n = 67). Patients on clobazam, however, were also more likely to develop adverse effects, particularly somnolence and fatigue. These differences in outcome in relation to type of comedication may be explained by the increase in plasma clobazam and N-desmethyl-clobazam levels caused by CBD.76 Additional analyses in the efficacy patient set showed that patients with Dravet syndrome (n = 32) had a 43% median reduction in all seizures, whereas for patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (n = 30) median reduction in total seizures was 36%. In a subgroup of children evaluated with a care-giver-filled quality of life questionnaire, CBD therapy was associated with improved scores for energy/fatigue, memory, control/helplessness, other cognitive functions, social interactions, behavior, and global quality of life, which did not correlate with changes in seizure frequency.118 Outcome data from a larger cohort of 261 children and young adults from the same program (including 44 with Dravet syndrome and 40 with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome) have also been reported in summary form.36 Convulsive seizure rate for the whole cohort decreased by a median of 48% compared with baseline, whereas atonic seizures in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome decreased by 71.1%. Overall, the main value of these studies is in providing a preliminary characterization of CBD safety profile. Data concerning improvement in seizure control, however, are difficult to assess in view of the uncontrolled nature of the observations.

Smaller uncontrolled studies and case reports have also suggested that CBD could be of value in the treatment of patients with drug resistant seizures associated with tuberous sclerosis complex,119,120 febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES),121 Sturge-Weber syndrome122 and malignant migrating partial seizures in infancy.123

Well controlled randomized trials

The recent flurry of research focused on the potential usefulness of cannabinoids in epilepsy has resulted in the completion of three well controlled randomized trials, all of which evaluated a liquid proprietary oral formulation of CBD.85,86,124 Of these trials, only one has been published in detail.85

Double-blind trial in Dravet syndrome

As an indication of the high interest of the medical community in the application of cannabinoids to epilepsy management, the first randomized placebo-controlled double-blind trial of CBD in Dravet syndrome was published in the New England Journal of Medicine in May 2017.85 In this trial, conducted at 23 centers in the USA and Europe, 120 patients with an established diagnosis of Dravet syndrome (mean age 9.8 years, range 2.3 to 18.4 years) were randomized to receive placebo or 20 mg/kg/day CBD in two divided daily administrations. All patients had at least 4 convulsive seizures during a preceding 4-week baseline, and CBD or placebo were added on to pre-existing medications, which included clobazam in 65% of cases. The duration of treatment was 14 weeks, including a 2-week-titration phase. Compared with baseline, the median monthly frequency of convulsive seizures (defined as the sum of tonic-clonic, tonic, clonic, and atonic seizures) decreased from 12.4 to 5.9 in the CBD group, and from 14.9 to 14.1 in the placebo group. Median percent changes in seizure frequency are shown in Fig. 4. The adjusted median difference in change in seizure frequency between the CBD and the placebo group (primary endpoint) was −22.8% (95% CI: −41.1 to −5.4, p = 0.01). The proportion of patients with ≥ 50% reduction in convulsive seizures frequency was 43% in the CBD group compared with 27% in the placebo group. Non-convulsive seizures were not significantly affected by CBD therapy. Three patients (5%) became seizure-free during the treatment period in the CBD group, compared with none in the placebo group.

Figure 4Median percent reduction in seizure frequency in the three randomized adjunctive-therapy placebo-controlled efficacy trials of cannabidiol (CBD) reported to date in patients with Dravet syndrome85 and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome.86,124 For patients with Dravet syndrome, seizure frequency refers to convulsive seizures. For patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, seizure frequency refers to drop seizures. P values refer to comparisons between each CBD group and corresponding placebo group. n refers to number of patients randomized into each group. For further details, see text.

Adverse events deemed to be related to the study treatment were reported in 75% of patients in the CBD group and 36% of those in the placebo group. Somnolence, diarrhea, and decreased appetite were the most common CBD-associated adverse events (Table 2). Eighteen of the 22 CBD-treated patients who developed somnolence were on clobazam comedication. Adverse events appeared mostly during the first two weeks of therapy, and there were instances in which the dose of CBD or other medications were reduced. No information, however, was reported on how often the dose of concomitant clobazam was reduced. Eight patients in the CBD group discontinued the trial prematurely due to adverse events (in three cases, marked elevation of liver enzymes), compared with one patient in the placebo group who also had a marked elevation in liver enzymes. Overall, elevated aminotransferases levels occurred in 12 patients in the CBD group and one in the placebo group, all of whom were on concomitant valproate therapy. In the nine patients with raised aminotransferases who did not discontinued treatment, liver enzymes reverted to normal on continuation of therapy.

Table 2Adverse events most commonly reported in the randomized double-bind placebo-controlled trial of CBD in comparison with placebo in patients with Dravet syndrome85

Adverse event	Percentage of patients with adverse event

	CBD group (n = 61)	Placebo group (n = 59)
Somnolence	36%	10%
Diarrhea	31%	10%
Decreased appetite	28%	5%
Fatigue	20%	3%
Vomiting	15%	5%
Fever	15%	8%
Lethargy	13%	5%
Convulsion	11%	5%
Upper respiratory tract infection	11%	8%

Overall, this trial provides for the first time robust evidence that CBD added-on to pre-existing AED treatment reduces the frequency of convulsive seizures in children and young adults with Dravet syndrome. The data also emphasize the need for caution in interpreting results from previous uncontrolled trials–although median convulsive seizure frequency (primary endpoint) decreased by a statistically significantly greater extent in the CBD group compared with the placebo group, the proportion of patients with ≥ 50% reduction in convulsive seizure frequency did not differ significantly between groups, and more than one quarter of patients allocated to placebo had their seizure frequency reduced by one-half or more during the trial. Interestingly, no significant differences between groups were found in sleep scores, behavioral adaptation (Vineland-II) scores, and Quality of Life in Childhood Epilepsy scores, even though duration of treatment was relatively short and possibly insufficient to determine changes in these parameters. A major weakness in the presentation of the trial results is the failure to report changes in plasma concentrations of concomitant AEDs and, most notably, clobazam and N-desmethylclobazam. In view of the fact that 66% of patients in the CBD group were on clobazam comedication, and evidence from a previous study indicating that N-desmethylclobazam levels increase by 500% on average after adding CBD,76 the reported data do not allow to determine whether the reported improvement in seizure frequency can be ascribed to a direct action of CBD, or is simply a consequence of increased plasma levels of comedication.

Double-blind trials in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome

Two well controlled double-blind trials in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome have been completed, but results to date have only been reported in summary form.86,124

In the first trial, 171 patients (mean age 15 years) with uncontrolled drop seizures (median baseline monthly frequency 74) were randomized to receive adjunctive treatment with CBD oral solution 20 mg/kg/day or placebo for a period of 14 weeks (2-week titration and 12-week maintenance).86 Fourteen patients (16%) in the CBD group and one patient (1%) in the placebo group withdrew prematurely. Compared with placebo, CBD treatment was associated with a greater median percent reduction in monthly drop seizures (44% vs. 22%; p = 0.0135, Fig. 4) and a greater proportion of patients with a ≥ 50% seizure reduction (44% vs. 24%; p = 0.0043). Adverse events were reported in 86% of CBD and 69% of placebo patients, the most common being diarrhoea, somnolence, pyrexia, decreased appetite, and vomiting. Treatment-related serious adverse events were reported in nine CBD patients and one placebo patient. Elevations in transaminases occurred mostly in patients on concomitant valproate therapy and all resolved.

In the second trial, 225 patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (mean age 16 years, median number of drop seizures per month at baseline 85) were randomised to three groups and allocated to two doses of CBD (10 or 20 mg/kg/day) or placebo.124 Enrolled patients were receiving a median of 3 concomitant AEDs. Duration of the trial was 14 weeks (2-week titration and 12-week maintenance). The reduction in monthly frequency of drop seizures was significantly greater in the CBD 20 mg/kg group (42%) and 10 mg/kg group (37%) than in the placebo group (17%; p = 0.0047 and 0.0016, respectively, Fig. 4). The proportion of patients with a ≥ 50% decrease in drop seizure frequency was also significantly greater in the 20 and 10 mg/kg groups (40% and 36%, respectively) than in the placebo group (15%; p = 0.0006 and p = 0.0030, respectively). Total seizures were also significantly reduced in both CBD groups compared with placebo. Adverse events were reported in 94% of patients allocated to 20 mg/kg, 84% of those allocated to 10 mg/kg, and 72% of placebo patients, the most common being somnolence and decreased appetite. Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in five patients in the 20 mg/kg group, two patients in the 10 mg/kg group, and no patients on placebo patients. Some elevations in transaminases were seen. Of 212 completers, 99% entered an open-label extension study.

Overall the results of these trials demonstrate that at dosages of 10 to 20 mg/kg/day CBD is superior to placebo in reducing the frequency of drop seizures in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Published reports, however, provide no information on concomitant therapies, and most notably whether, and to what extent, the clinical improvement on CBD therapy could be related to elevation in serum concentrations of other medications, most notably clobazam and N-desmethylclobazam.

Conclusions and future perspectives

The interest in cannabis preparations in the treatment of epilepsies, particularly drug refractory childhood epilepsies, has skyrocketed in recent years. Marijuana and other cannabis products with moderate to high THC content utilized primarily for recreational purposes are generally unsuitable for this indication, not only because evidence for an anti-seizure activity of THC is equivocal and risk of seizure aggravation cannot be excluded,101 but also because THC is associated with many undesired effects, including addiction liability, psychiatric disorders, cognitive and motor impairment125–127 and, possibly, also cardiovascular toxicity.128 The maturing brain is also more vulnerable to the adverse of effects of marijuana,126,129,130 and there is evidence of THC impairing structural and functional connectivity during brain development.126,129,130 Discontinuation of THC after prolonged exposure can also lead to withdrawal manifestations131,132 and cases have been reported of seizure exacerbation after marijuana cessation in people with epilepsy.133

Compared with THC, CBD shows a better defined anticonvulsant profile in animal models considered to be predictive of efficacy against focal and generalized seizures. Moreover, CBD is largely devoid of adverse psychoactive effects, and is considered to lack the abuse liability associated with THC-containing products.134 In the last decade, this has led to an increasing use of CBD-enriched extracts as a potential treatment for epilepsy, particularly in children. Improvement in seizure control, often associated with additional benefits on sleep and behaviour, have been reported in a sizeable proportion of cases,87 but interpretation of these data is made difficult by the uncontrolled nature of the observations. Additionally, as discussed in this article, there are concerns about the quality and variability of many of the products used,98 particularly because cannabis treatment is often initiated spontaneously by patients or caregivers without adequate medical supervision.105

Evidence concerning the potential anti-seizure efficacy of cannabinoids reached a turning point in the last 12 months, with the completion of the first high-quality placebo-controlled trials of a purified oil-based liquid CBD preparation in patients with Dravet syndrome and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome.85,86,124 The results of these studies demonstrate that, at a dosage of 20 mg/kg/day, CBD added on to pre-existing AED treatment is superior to placebo in reducing the frequency of convulsive (tonic-clonic, tonic, clonic, and atonic) seizures in patients with Dravet syndrome, and the frequency of drop seizures in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. In the latter patients, a dosage of 10 mg/kg/day treatment was also superior to placebo. Therefore there is now for the first time class 1 evidence that CBD improves seizure control when added on to other AEDs in patients with two difficult-to-treat epileptic encephalopathies. Available data, however, do not allow to conclude that CBD per se has anti-seizure activity. At least for the trial published in full,85 a majority of patients were receiving concomitant clobazam therapy, and it is unclear whether the reported seizure benefits, as well as adverse effects, were related to a direct action of CBD, or were mediated by a previously described 5-fold elevation in plasma N-desmethylclobazam levels. For the two studies in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, the proportion of patients on concomitant clobazam therapy was not reported, but it is likely to have been significant because clobazam is a frequently used comedication in patients with this syndrome. Clarification of the independent effects of CBD would require re-assessment of trial data for the subgroup of patients not comedicated with clobazam, or the conduction of further studies after excluding such patients or, alternatively, adjusting blindly clobazam dosages to maintain unaltered concentration of N-desmethylclobazam. Additional well controlled studies are also desirable to determine the potential value of CBD in other seizure types and epilepsy syndromes, including refractory focal epilepsies.

One of the reasons for the utilization of cannabis products to have become so popular among patients and their caregivers is that these products are generally regarded as causing fewer adverse effects compared with traditional AEDs, partly out of the misperception that remedies derived from natural products are unlikely to be harmful. In a survey carried out by Epilepsia, 96% of respondents among the general public felt that there was sufficient safety evidence about cannabis products, whereas only 34% of physicians considered this to be the case.135 In fact, in the randomized controlled trials conducted to date the tolerability profile of CDB was relatively benign, with somnolence, decreased appetite and gastrointestinal symptoms being the most common treatment-emergent adverse events. Although these results are encouraging, further studies are required to evaluate the safety profile of CBD and other cannabis products in greater detail, particularly after long-term exposure and whenever these products are used in subpopulations potentially at risk. Elevations of liver enzymes have been frequently observed, especially in patients comedicated with valproate, and although they were generally reversible, close observation for signs suggestive of hepatic toxicity is advisable. Nabiximols, an oromucosal spray formulation containing approximately equal amounts of THC and CBD, has been commercially available in several countries for a number of years and has a relatively extensive safety record.68 However, the maximum approved daily CBD dose in nabiximols is considerably lower than the CBD doses used in epilepsy trials, and experience of nabiximols in pediatric age is limited because the product is not recommended for use ‘below 18 years of age due to lack of safety and efficacy data’.68 As discussed above, prolonged exposure of the immature brain to THC has been shown to cause deleterious effects on brain connectivity, and there is some evidence of prolonged recreational use of marijuana in adolescence being associated with neuropsychological decline and lower academic performance scores.136,137 There are also special concerns for risks to the offspring of mothers who use marijuana during pregnancy.138,139 Although these findings may be specific for THC and other psychoactive cannabinoids, adequate safety data for young children exposed to long-term CBD therapy are not yet available.24 Another area where limited data is available relates to the risk of rebound seizures following abrupt or rapid discontinuation of treatment. Unlike THC, CBD is not associated with the development of tolerance after repeated administration in various seizure models, and there is no evidence of a withdrawal syndrome developing after CBD discontinuation.12

These are exciting times for research in cannabinoids. After almost four millennia of their documented medical use in the treatment of seizure disorders, we are very close to obtaining conclusive evidence of their efficacy in some severe epilepsy syndromes. The era of evidence-based prescription of a cannabis product is within our sight.

Acknowledgements

Emilio Perucca received speaker and/consultancy fees from Eisai, Biopharm Solutions, GW Pharma, Mylan, Sanofi, Shire, Sun Pharma, Takeda, an UCB Pharma.

References

Untitled section

References

1.Elsohly M. Marijuana and the Cannabinoids. Totowa: Humana Press; 2007.
2.Friedman D, Sirven JI. Historical perspective on the medical use of cannabis for epilepsy: ancient times to the 1980s. Epilepsy Behav. 2017;70(Pt B):298–301. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.11.033.
3.Russo EB. Cannabis and epilepsy: an ancient treatment returns to the fore. Epilepsy Behav. 2017;70(Pt B):292–7. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.09.040.
4.Russo EB, Jiang HE, Li X, et al. Phytochemical and genetic analyses of ancient cannabis from Central Asia. J Exp Bot. 2008;59:4171–82. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ern260.
5.O’Shaughnessy WB. On the preparations of the Indian hemp, or Gunjah: Cannabis indica their effects on the animal system in health, and their utility in the treatment of tetanus and other convulsive diseases. Prov Med J Retrosp Med Sci. 1843;5:363–9.
6.Gowers W. Epilepsy and other chronic convulsive disorders. London: Churchill; 1881.
7.ElSohly M, Gul W. Constituents of cannabis sativa. In: Petwee RG, editor. Handbook of Cannabis. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014. pp. 3–22.
8.Chandra S, Lata H, ElSohly MA, Walker LA, Potter D. Cannabis cultivation: methodological issues for obtaining medical-grade product. Epilepsy Behav. 2017;70(Pt B):302–12. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.11.029.
9.Reddy DS, Golub VM. The pharmacological basis of cannabis therapy for epilepsy. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2016;357:45–55. doi: 10.1124/jpet.115.230151.
10.Hofmann ME, Frazier CJ. Marijuana, endocannabinoids, and epilepsy: potential and challenges for improved therapeutic intervention. Exp Neurol. 2013;244:43–50. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2011.11.047.
11.Mechoulam R, Parker LA. The endocannabinoid system and the brain. Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64:21–47. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143739.
12.Rosenberg EC, Tsien RW, Whalley BJ, Devinsky O. Cannabinoids and epilepsy. Neurotherapeutics. 2015;12:747–68. doi: 10.1007/s13311-015-0375-5.
13.Blair RE, Deshpande LS, DeLorenzo RJ. Cannabinoids: is there a potential treatment role in epilepsy? Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2015;16:1911–4. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2015.1074181.
14.Rosenberg EC, Patra PH, Whalley BJ. Therapeutic effects of cannabinoids in animal models of seizures, epilepsy, epileptogenesis, and epilepsy-related neuroprotection. Epilepsy Behav. 2017;70(Pt B):319–27. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.11.006.
15.Lupica CR, Hu Y, Devinsky O, Hoffman AF. Cannabinoids as hippocampal network administrators. Neuropharmacology. 2017;124:25–37. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2017.04.003.
16.Katona I. Cannabis and endocannabinoid signaling in epilepsy. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2015;231:285–316. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-20825-1_10.
17.Soltesz I, Alger BE, Kano M, et al. Weeding out bad waves: towards selective cannabinoid circuit control in epilepsy. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2015;16:264–77. doi: 10.1038/nrn3937.
18.Romigi A, Bari M, Placidi F, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid levels of the endocannabinoid anandamide are reduced in patients with untreated newly diagnosed temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2010;51:768–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02334.x.
19.Ludányi A, Eross L, Czirják S, et al. Downregulation of the CB1 cannabinoid receptor and related molecular elements of the endocannabinoid system in epileptic human hippocampus. J Neurosci. 2008;28:2976–90. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4465-07.2008.
20.Maglóczky Z, Tóth K, Karlócai R, et al. Dynamic changes of CB1-receptor expression in hippocampi of epileptic mice and humans. Epilepsia. 2010;51( Suppl 3):115–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02624.x.
21.Goffin K, Van Paesschen W, Van Laere K. In vivo activation of endocannabinoid system in temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis. Brain. 2011;134(Pt 4):1033–40. doi: 10.1093/brain/awq385.
22.Benbadis SR, Sanchez-Ramos J, Bozorg A, et al. Medical marijuana in neurology. Expert Rev Neurother. 2014;14:1453–65. doi: 10.1586/14737175.2014.985209.
23.Detyniecki K, Hirsch L. Marijuana use in epilepsy: the myth and the reality. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2015;15:65–70. doi: 10.1007/s11910-015-0586-5.
24.Friedman D, Devinsky O. Cannabinoids in the treatment of epilepsy. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1048–58. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1407304.
25.Bisogno T, Hanus L, De Petrocellis L, et al. Molecular targets for cannabidiol and its synthetic analogues: effect on vanilloid VR1 receptors and on the cellular uptake and enzymatic hydrolysis of anandamide. Br J Pharmacol. 2001;134:845–52. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0704327.
26.Carrier EJ, Auchampach JA, Hillard CJ. Inhibition of an equilibrative nucleoside transporter by cannabidiol: a mechanism of cannabinoid immunosuppression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:7895–900. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0511232103.
27.Thomas A, Baillie GL, Phillips AM, Razdan RK, Ross RA, Pertwee RG. Cannabidiol displays unexpectedly high potency as an antagonist of CB1 and CB2 receptor agonists in vitro. Br J Pharmacol. 2007;150:613–23. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707133.
28.De Petrocellis L, Ligresti A, Moriello AS, et al. Effects of cannabinoids and cannabinoid-enriched Cannabis extracts on TRP channels and endocannabinoid metabolic enzymes. Br J Pharmacol. 2011;163:1479–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.01166.x.
29.Hill AJ, Jones NA, Smith I, et al. Voltage-gated sodium (NaV) channel blockade by plant cannabinoids does not confer anticonvulsant effects per se. Neurosci Lett. 2014;566:269–74. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2014.03.013.
30.Iannotti FA, Hill CL, Leo A, et al. Nonpsychotropic plant cannabinoids, cannabidivarin (CBDV) and cannabidiol (CBD), activate and desensitize transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) channels in vitro: potential for the treatment of neuronal hyperexcitability. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2014;5:1131–41. doi: 10.1021/cn5000524.
31.Ibeas Bih C, Chen T, Nunn AV, et al. Molecular targets of cannabidiol in neurological disorders. Neurotherapeutics. 2015;12:699–730. doi: 10.1007/s13311-015-0377-3.
32.McPartland JM, Duncan M, Di Marzo V, Pertwee RG. Are cannabidiol and Δ(9) -tetrahydrocannabivarin negative modulators of the endocannabinoid system? A systematic review. Br J Pharmacol. 2015;172:737–53. doi: 10.1111/bph.12944.
33.Gaston TE, Friedman D. Pharmacology of cannabinoids in the treatment of epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2017;70(Pt B):313–8. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.11.016.
34.Rong C, Lee Y, Carmona NE, et al. Cannabidiol in medical marijuana: research vistas and potential opportunities. Pharmacol Res. 2017;121:213–8. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2017.05.005.
35.Thompson CH, Kearney JA. Cannabidiol mellows out resurgent sodium current. Epilepsy Curr. 2016;16:399–401. doi: 10.5698/1535-7511-16.6.399.
36.Bialer M, Johannessen SI, Levy RH, Perucca E, Tomson T, White HS. Progress report on new antiepileptic drugs: a summary of the Thirteenth Eilat Conference on New Antiepileptic Drugs and Devices (EILAT XIII) Epilepsia. 2017;58:181–221. doi: 10.1111/epi.13634.
37.Devinsky O, Cilio MR, Cross H, et al. Cannabidiol: pharmacology and potential therapeutic role in epilepsy and other neuropsychiatric disorders. Epilepsia. 2014;55:791–802. doi: 10.1111/epi.12631.
38.Solimini R, Rotolo MC, Pichini S, Pacifici R. Neurological disorders in medical use of cannabis: an update. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2017;16:527–33. doi: 10.2174/1871527316666170413105421.
39.Leite JR, Carlini EA, Lander N, Mechoulam R. Anticonvulsant effects of the (−) and (+)isomers of cannabidiol and their dimethylheptyl homologs. Pharmacology. 1982;24:141–6. doi: 10.1159/000137588.
40.Consroe P, Benedito MA, Leite JR, Carlini EA, Mechoulam R. Effects of cannabidiol on behavioral seizures caused by convulsant drugs or current in mice. Eur Pharmacol. 1982;83:293–8. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(82)90264-3.
41.Klein BD, Jacobson CA, Metcalf CS, et al. Evaluation of cannabidiol in animal seizure models by the Epilepsy Therapy Screening Program (ETSP) Neurochem Res. 2017;42:1939–48. doi: 10.1007/s11064-017-2287-8.
42.Jones NA, Hill AJ, Smith I, et al. Cannabidiol displays antiepileptiform and antiseizure properties in vitro and in vivo. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2010;332:569–77. doi: 10.1124/jpet.109.159145.
43.Karler R, Turkanis SA. Cannabis and epilepsy. Adv Biosci. 1978;22–23:619–41. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-08-023759-6.50052-4.
44.Karler R, Turkanis SA. The cannabinoids as potential antiepileptics. J clin Pharmacol. 1981;21(8–9 Suppl):437S–48. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1981.tb02624.x.
45.Consroe P, Wolkin A. Cannabidiol--antiepileptic drug comparisons and interactions in experimentally induced seizures in rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1977;201:26–32.
46.Gobira PH, Vilela LR, Gonçalves BD, et al. Cannabidiol, a Cannabis sativa constituent, inhibits cocaine-induced seizures in mice: possible role of the mTOR pathway and reduction in glutamate release. Neurotoxicology. 2015;50:116–21. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2015.08.007.
47.Jones NA, Glyn SE, Akiyama S, et al. Cannabidiol exerts anti-convulsant effects in animal models of temporal lobe and partial seizures. Seizure. 2012;21:344–52. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2012.03.001.
48.Chiu P, Olsen DM, Borys HK, Karler R, Turkanis SA. The influence of cannabidiol and delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol on cobalt epilepsy in rats. Epilepsia. 1979;20:365–75. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1979.tb04816.x.
49.Do Val-da Silva RA, Peixoto-Santos JE, Kandratavicius L, et al. Protective effects of cannabidiol against seizures and neuronal death in a rat model of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Front Pharmacol. 2017;8:131. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00131.
50.Turkanis SA, Smiley KA, Borys HK, Olsen DM, Karler R. An electro-physiological analysis of the anticonvulsant action of cannabidiol on limbic seizures in conscious rats. Epilepsia. 1979;20:351–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1979.tb04815.x.
51.Hill AJ, Williams CM, Whalley BJ, Stephens GJ. Phytocannabinoids as novel therapeutic agents in CNS disorders. Pharmacol Ther. 2012;133:79–97. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2011.09.002.
52.Zuardi AW, Crippa JA, Hallak JE, et al. A critical review of the anti-psychotic effects of cannabidiol: 30 years of a translational investigation. Curr Pharm Des. 2012;18:5131–40. doi: 10.2174/138161212802884681.
53.Crippa JA, Derenusson GN, Ferrari TB, et al. Neural basis of anxiolytic effects of cannabidiol (CBD) in generalized social anxiety disorder: a preliminary report. J Psychopharmacol. 2011;25:121–30. doi: 10.1177/0269881110379283.
54.Walter L, Stella N. Cannabinoids and neuroinflammation. Br J Pharmacol. 2004;141:775–85. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705667.
55.Malfait AM, Gallily R, Sumariwalla PF, et al. The nonpsychoactive cannabis constituent cannabidiol is an oral anti-arthritic therapeutic in murine collagen-induced arthritis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:9561–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.160105897.
56.Mannucci C, Navarra M, Calapai F, et al. Neurological aspects of medical use of cannabidiol. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2017;16:541–53. doi: 10.2174/1871527316666170413114210.
57.Hill AJ, Mercier MS, Hill TD, et al. Cannabidivarin is anticonvulsant in mouse and rat. Br J Pharmacol. 2012;167:1629–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.02207.x.
58.Hill TD, Cascio MG, Romano B, et al. Cannabidivarin-rich cannabis extracts are anticonvulsant in mouse and rat via a CB1 receptor-independent mechanism. Br J Pharmacol. 2013;170:679–92. doi: 10.1111/bph.12321.
59.Turner SE, Williams CM, Iversen L, Whalley BJ. Molecular pharmacology of phytocannabinoids. Prog Chem Org Nat Prod. 2017;103:61–101. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-45541-9_3.
60.Grotenhermen F. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cannabinoids. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2003;42:327–60. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200342040-00003.
61.Sulak D, Saneto R, Goldstein B. The current status of artisanal cannabis for the treatment of epilepsy in the United States. Epilepsy Behav. 2017;70(Pt B):328–33. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.12.032.
62.Manini AF, Yiannoulos G, Bergamaschi MM, et al. Safety and pharmacokinetics of oral cannabidiol when administered concomitantly with intravenous fentanyl in humans. J Addict Med. 2015;9:204–10. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000118.
63.Bialer M, Johannessen SI, Levy RH, Perucca E, Tomson T, White HS. Progress report on new antiepileptic drugs: a summary of the Twelfth Eilat Conference (EILAT XII) Epilepsy Res. 2015;111:85–141. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2015.01.001.
64.Ohlsson A, Lindgren JE, Andersson S, et al. Single dose kinetics of cannabidiol in man. In: Agurell S, Dewey WL, Willette R, editors. The cannabinoids: chemical, pharmacologic, and therapeutic aspects. New York: Academic Press; 1984. pp. 219–25.
65.Stott CG, White L, Wright S, Wilbraham D, Guy GW. A phase I study to assess the effect of food on the single dose bioavailability of the THC/CBD oromucosal spray. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;69:825–34. doi: 10.1007/s00228-012-1393-4.
66.Jiang R, Yamaori S, Takeda S, Yamamoto I, Watanabe K. Identification of cytochrome P450 enzymes responsible for metabolism of cannabidiol by human liver microsomes. Life Sci. 2011;89:165–70. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2011.05.018.
67.Stout SM, Cimino NM. Exogenous cannabinoids as substrates, inhibitors, and inducers of human drug metabolizing enzymes: a systematic review. Drug Metab Rev. 2014;46:86–95. doi: 10.3109/03602532.2013.849268.
68.Sativex . Summary of Product Characteristics (March 2015 revision) [Internet] Newbury: GW Pharma Ltd; [cited 2017 Jul 6]. Available at: https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/medicine/23262.
69.Wright S, Devinsky O, Thiele EA, et al. Cannabidiol (CBD) in Dravet syndrome: a randomised, dose-ranging pharmacokinetics and safety trial (GWPCARE1). 32nd International Epilepsy Congress; 2017 Sep 2 – Sep 6; Barcelona, Spain Epilepsia. In press.
70.Stott C, White L, Wright S, Wilbraham D, Guy G. A phase I, open-label, randomized, crossover study in three parallel groups to evaluate the effect of rifampicin, ketoconazole, and omeprazole on the pharmacokinetics of THC/CBD oromucosal spray in healthy volunteers. Springerplus. 2013;2:236. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-236.
71.Yamaori S, Okamoto Y, Yamamoto I, Watanabe K. Cannabidiol, a major phytocannabinoid, as a potent atypical inhibitor for CYP2D6. Drug Metab Dispos. 2011;39:2049–56. doi: 10.1124/dmd.111.041384.
72.Jiang R, Yamaori S, Okamoto Y, Yamamoto I, Watanabe K. Cannabidiol is a potent inhibitor of the catalytic activity of cytochrome P450 2C19. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2013;28:332–8. doi: 10.2133/dmpk.dmpk-12-rg-129.
73.Zendulka O, Dovrtělová G, Nosková K, et al. Cannabinoids and cytochrome P450 interactions. Curr Drug Metab. 2016;17:206–26. doi: 10.2174/1389200217666151210142051.
74.Arellano AL, Papaseit E, Romaguera A, Torrens M, Farré M. Neuropsychiatric and general interactions of natural and synthetic cannabinoids with drugs of abuse and medicines. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2017;16:554–66. doi: 10.2174/1871527316666170413104516.
75.Reddy DS. The utility of cannabidiol in the treatment of refractory epilepsy. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017;101:182–4. doi: 10.1002/cpt.441.
76.Geffrey AL, Pollack SF, Bruno PL, Thiele EA. Drug-drug interaction between clobazam and cannabidiol in children with refractory epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2015;56:1246–51. doi: 10.1111/epi.13060.
77.Gaston TE, Bebin EM, Cutter GR, Liu Y, Szaflarski JP, UAB CBD Program Interactions between cannabidiol and commonly used anti-epileptic drugs. Epilepsia. 2017:581586–92. doi: 10.1111/epi.13852.
78.Petitet F, Jeantaud B, Reibaud M, Imperato A, Dubroeucq MC. Complex pharmacology of natural cannabinoids: evidence for partial agonist activity of Δ 9-tetrahydrocannabinol and antagonist activity of Cannabidiol on rat brain cannabinoid receptors. Life Sci. 1998;63:PL1–6. doi: 10.1016/s0024-3205(98)00238-0.
79.Englund A, Morrison PD, Nottage J, et al. Cannabidiol inhibits THC-elicited paranoid symptoms and hippocampal-dependent memory impairment. J Psychopharmacol. 2013;27:19–27. doi: 10.1177/0269881112460109.
80.Todd SM, Arnold JC. Neural correlates of interactions between cannabidiol and Δ(9) -tetrahydrocannabinol in mice: implications for medical cannabis. Br J Pharmacol. 2016;173:53–65. doi: 10.1111/bph.13333.
81.Niesink RJ, Van Laar MW. Does cannabidiol protect against adverse psychological effects of THC? Front Psychiatry. 2013;4:130. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00130.
82.Todd SM, Zhou C, Clarke DJ, Chohan TW, Bahceci D, Arnold JC. Interactions between cannabidiol and Δ 9-THC following acute and repeated dosing: rebound hyperactivity, sensorimotor gating and epigenetic and neuroadaptive changes in the mesolimbic pathway. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2017;27:132–45. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2016.12.004.
83.Russo EB. Taming THC: potential cannabis synergy and phytocannabinoid-terpenoid entourage effects. Br J Pharmacol. 2011;163:1344–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01238.x.
84.Devinsky O, Marsh E, Friedman D, et al. Cannabidiol in patients with treatment-resistant epilepsy: an open-label interventional trial. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15:270–8. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00379-8.
85.Devinsky O, Cross JH, Laux L, et al. Trial of cannabidiol for drug-resistant seizures in the Dravet syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:2011–20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1611618.
86.Mazurkiewicz-Beldzinska M, Thiele EA, Benbadis S, et al. Treatment with cannabidiol (CBD) significantly reduces drop seizure frequency in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS): results of a multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (GWPCARE4). 32nd International Epilepsy Congress; 2017 Sep 2 – Sep 6; Barcelona, Spain Epilepsia. In press.
87.O’Connell BK, Gloss D, Devinsky O. Cannabinoids in treatment-resistant epilepsy: a review. Epilepsy Behav. 2017;70(Pt B):341–8. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.11.012.
88.Consroe PF, Wood GC, Buchsbaum H. Anticonvulsant nature of marihuana smoking. JAMA. 1975;234:306–7.
89.Ellison JM, Gelwan E, Ogletree J. Complex partial seizure symptoms affected by marijuana abuse. J Clin Psychiatry. 1990;51:439–40.
90.Mortati K, Dworetzky B, Devinsky O. Marijuana: an effective anti-epileptic treatment in partial epilepsy? A case report and review of the literature. Rev Neurol Dis. 2007;4:103–6.
91.Massot-Tarrús A, McLachlan RS. Marijuana use in adults admitted to a Canadian epilepsy monitoring unit. Epilepsy Behav. 2016;63:73–8. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.08.002.
92.Gross DW, Hamm J, Ashworth NL, Quigley D. Marijuana use and epilepsy: prevalence in patients of a tertiary care epilepsy center. Neurology. 2004;62:2095–7. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000127623.03766.75.
93.Brust JC, Ng SK, Hauser AW, et al. Marijuana use and the risk of new onset seizures. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 1992;103:176–81.
94.Keeler MH, Reifler CB. Grand mal convulsions subsequent to marijuana use. Case report. Dis Nerv Syst. 1967;28(7 Pt 1):474–5.
95.Hamerle M, Ghaeni L, Kowski A, Weissinger F, Holtkamp M. Cannabis and other illicit drug use in epilepsy patients. Eur J Neurol. 2014;21:167–70. doi: 10.1111/ene.12081.
96.Mead A. The legal status of cannabis (marijuana) and cannabidiol (CBD) under U.S. law. Epilepsy Behav. 2017;70(Pt B):288–91. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.11.021.
97.Vandrey R, Raber JC, Raber ME, Douglass B, Miller C, Bonn-Miller MO. Cannabinoid dose and label accuracy in edible medical cannabis products. JAMA. 2015;313:2491–3. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.6613.
98.U.S. Food and Drug Administration . 2016 Warning letters and test results for cannabidiol-related products [Internet] Silver Spring (MD): U.S. Food and Drug Administration; [cited 2017 Jun 26]. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/PublicHealthFocus/ucm484109.htm.
99.National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Health and Medicine Division, Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice, Committee on the Health Effects of Marijuana: an evidence review and research agenda . The health effects of cannabis and cannabinoids: the current state of evidence and recommendations for research. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 2017.
100.Crippa JA, Crippa AC, Hallak JE, Martín-Santos R, Zuardi AW. Δ9-THC intoxication by cannabidiol-enriched cannabis extract in two children with refractory epilepsy: full remission after switching to purified cannabidiol. Front Pharmacol. 2016;7:359. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2016.00359.
101.Hausman-Kedem M, Kramer U. Efficacy of medical cannabis for treatment of refractory epilepsy in children and adolescents with emphasis on the Israeli experience. Isr Med Assoc J. 2017;19:76–8.
102.Maa E, Figi P. The case for medical marijuana in epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2014;55:783–6. doi: 10.1111/epi.12610.
103.Porter BE, Jacobson C. Report of a parent survey of cannabidiol-enriched cannabis use in pediatric treatment-resistant epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2013;29:574–7. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2013.08.037.
104.Hussain SA, Zhou R, Jacobson C, et al. Perceived efficacy of cannabidiol-enriched cannabis extracts for treatment of pediatric epilepsy: a potential role for infantile spasms and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Epilepsy Behav. 2015;47:138–41. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.04.009.
105.Suraev AS, Todd L, Bowen MT, et al. An Australian nationwide survey on medicinal cannabis use for epilepsy: history of antiepileptic drug treatment predicts medicinal cannabis use. Epilepsy Behav. 2017;70(Pt B):334–40. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.02.005.
106.Aguirre-Velázquez CG. Report from a survey of parents regarding the use of cannabidiol (medicinal cannabis) in Mexican children with refractory epilepsy. Neurol Res Int. 2017;2017:2985729. doi: 10.1155/2017/2985729.
107.Press CA, Knupp KG, Chapman KE. Parental reporting of response to oral cannabis extracts for treatment of refractory epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2015;45:49–52. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.02.043.
108.Treat L, Chapman KE, Colborn KL, Knupp KG. Duration of use of oral cannabis extract in a cohort of pediatric epilepsy patients. Epilepsia. 2017;58:123–7. doi: 10.1111/epi.13617.
109.Tzadok M, Uliel-Siboni S, Linder I, et al. CBD-enriched medical cannabis for intractable pediatric epilepsy: the current Israeli experience. Seizure. 2016;35:41–4. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2016.01.004.
110.Perucca E, Wiebe S. Not all that glitters is gold: a guide to the critical interpretation of drug trials in epilepsy. Epilepsia Open. 2016;1–2:9–21. doi: 10.1002/epi4.3.
111.Frisaldi E, Shaibani A, Benedetti F. Why we should assess patients’ expectations in clinical trials. Pain Ther. 2017;6:107–10. doi: 10.1007/s40122-017-0071-8.
112.Mechoulam R, Carlini EA. Toward drugs derived from cannabis. Naturwissenschaften. 1978;65:174–9. doi: 10.1007/BF00450585.
113.Cunha JM, Carlini EA, Pereira AE, et al. Chronic administration of cannabidiol to healthy volunteers and epileptic patients. Pharmacology. 1980;21:175–85. doi: 10.1159/000137430.
114.Ames FR, Cridland S. Anticonvulsant effect of cannabidiol. South Afr Med J. 1986;69:14.
115.Trembly B, Sherman M. Double-blind clinical study of cannabidiol as a secondary anticonvulsant. Marijuana ‘90 International Conference on Cannabis and Cannabinoids; 1990 Jul 8–Jul 11; Kolympari, Greece.
116.Gloss D, Vickrey B. Cannabinoids for epilepsy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(3):CD009270. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009270.pub3.
117.Koppel BS, Brust JC, Fife T, et al. Systematic review: efficacy and safety of medical marijuana in selected neurologic disorders: report of the Guideline Development Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2014;82:1556–63. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000363.
118.Rosenberg EC, Louik J, Conway E, Devinsky O, Friedman D. Quality of life in childhood epilepsy in pediatric patients enrolled in a prospective, open-label clinical study with cannabidiol. Epilepsia. 2017;58:e96–100. doi: 10.1111/epi.13815.
119.Hess EJ, Moody KA, Geffrey AL, et al. Cannabidiol as a new treatment for drug-resistant epilepsy in tuberous sclerosis complex. Epilepsia. 2016;57:1617–24. doi: 10.1111/epi.13499.
120.Nickels K. Cannabidiol in patients with intractable epilepsy due to TSC: a possible medication but not a miracle. Epilepsy Curr. 2017;17:91–2. doi: 10.5698/1535-7511.17.2.91.
121.Gofshteyn JS, Wilfong A, Devinsky O, et al. Cannabidiol as a potential treatment for febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES) in the acute and chronic phases. J Child Neurol. 2017;32:35–40. doi: 10.1177/0883073816669450.
122.Kaplan EH, Offermann EA, Sievers JW, Comi AM. Cannabidiol treatment for refractory seizures in Sturge-Weber syndrome. Pediatr Neurol. 2017;71:18–23.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2017.02.009.
123.Saade D, Joshi C. Pure cannabidiol in the treatment of malignant migrating partial seizures in infancy: a case report. Pediatr Neurol. 2015;52:544–7. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2015.02.008.
124.Zuberi S, Devinsky O, Patel A, et al. Cannabidiol (CBD) significantly decreases drop and total seizure frequency in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS): Rresults of a dose-ranging, multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (GWPCARE3). 32nd International Epilepsy Congress; 2017 Sep 2 – Sep 6; Barcelona, Spain Epilepsia. In press.
125.Tamm L, Epstein JN, Lisdahl KM, et al. Impact of ADHD and cannabis use on executive functioning in young adults. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013;133:607–14. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.08.001.
126.Volkow ND, Baler RD, Compton WM, Weiss SR. Adverse health effects of marijuana use. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:2219–27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1402309.
127.Di Forti M, Marconi A, Carra E, et al. Proportion of patients in south London with first-episode psychosis attributable to use of high potency cannabis: a case-control study. Lancet Psychiatry. 2015;2:233–8. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(14)00117-5.
128.Wolff V, Jouanjus E. Strokes are possible complications of cannabinoids use. Epilepsy Behav. 2017;70(Pt B):355–63. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.01.031.
129.Crocker CE, Tibbo PG. Cannabis and the maturing brain: role in psychosis development. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015;97:545–7. doi: 10.1002/cpt.102.
130.Mandelbaum DE, de la Monte SM. Adverse structural and functional effects of marijuana on the brain: evidence reviewed. Pediatr Neurol. 2017;66:12–20. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2016.09.004.
131.Budney AJ, Hughes JR. The cannabis withdrawal syndrome. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2006;19:233–8. doi: 10.1097/01.yco.0000218592.00689.e5.
132.Budney AJ, Vandrey RG, Hughes JR, Moore BA, Bahrenburg B. Oral delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol suppresses cannabis withdrawal symptoms. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007;86:22–9. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.04.014.
133.Hegde M, Santos-Sanchez C, Hess CP, Kabir AA, Garcia PA. Seizure exacerbation in two patients with focal epilepsy following marijuana cessation. Epilepsy Behav. 2012;25:563–6. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2012.09.024.
134.Babalonis S, Haney M, Malcolm RJ, et al. Oral cannabidiol does not produce a signal for abuse liability in frequent marijuana smokers. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017;172:9–13. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.11.030.
135.Mathern GW, Beninsig L, Nehlig A. Fewer specialists support using medical marijuana and CBD in treating epilepsy patients compared with other medical professionals and patients: result of Epilepsia’s survey. Epilepsia. 2015;56:1–6. doi: 10.1111/epi.12843.
136.Meier MH, Caspi A, Ambler A, et al. Persistent cannabis users show neuropsychological decline from childhood to midlife. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:E2657–64. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1206820109.
137.Meier MH, Hill ML, Small PJ, Luthar SS. Associations of adolescent cannabis use with academic performance and mental health: a longitudinal study of upper middle class youth. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015;156:207–12. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.09.010.
138.Bernard C, Milh M, Morozov YM, Ben-Ari Y, Freund TF, Gozlan H. Altering cannabinoid signaling during development disrupts neuronal activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:9388–93. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0409641102.
139.Alpár A, Di Marzo V, Harkany T. At the tip of an iceberg: prenatal marijuana and its possible relation to neuropsychiatric outcome in the offspring. Biol Psychiatry. 2016;79:e33–45. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.09.009.

Cannabinoids in the Treatment of Epilepsy: Hard Evidence at Last?

Related local records

Studies

Conditions

Cannabinoids and active compounds

Connected local records

Related research

Cannabinoids in the Treatment of Epilepsy: Hard Evidence at Last?

License

Authors

Abstract

Untitled section

Article notes

Untitled section

Author notes

Introduction

Chemistry and mechanisms of action

Pharmacological profile in experimental models of seizures and epilepsy

CBD

CBDV

9-Δ-tetrahydrocannabinolinic acid

Pharmacokinetics and drug interactions

CBD

CBDV

Clinical evidence of efficacy and safety: exploratory studies

Marijuana and oral cannabis extracts

Purified cannabidiol

Well controlled randomized trials

Double-blind trial in Dravet syndrome

Double-blind trials in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome

Conclusions and future perspectives

Acknowledgements

References

Untitled section

References