The Evolving Role of Cannabidiol-Rich Cannabis in People with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review

Article type: Review Article

Keywords: cannabidiol, CBD, autism, autism spectrum disorder

Authors: Bilal Jawed, Jessica Elisabetta Esposito ⚬, Riccardo Pulcini ⚬, Syed Khuram Zakir, Matteo Botteghi ⚬, Francesco Gaudio ⚬, Daniele Savio, Caterina Martinotti, Stefano Martinotti ⚬, Elena Toniato

Affiliations: Unit of Clinical Pathology and Microbiology, Miulli Generale Hospital, LUM University, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti, Italy; bilaljawed2007@gmail.com (B.J.); khuramabbas512@gmail.com (S.K.Z.); martinotti@lum.it (S.M.); PhD Program in Science and Technology in Sustainable Development, G.d’Annunzio University, 66100 Chieti, Italy; riccardo.pulcini@unich.it (R.P.); caterina.martinotti@hotmail.it (C.M.); Department of Innovative Technology in Medicine and Dentistry, G.d’Annunzio University, 66100 Chieti, Italy; j.elisabetta.esposito@gmail.com; PhD Program in Innovative Technologies in Clinical Medicine and Dentistry, G.d’Annunzio University, 66100 Chieti, Italy; Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60121 Ancona, Italy; matteo@botteghi.com; Unit of Hematology, Miulli Generale Hospital, LUM University, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti, Italy; gaudio@lum.it; Research & Development Unit, R&D Solution Srl, 13030 Greggio, Italy; info@rdsolutions.it

License: © 2024 by the authors. CC BY 4.0 Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Article links: DOI: 10.3390/ijms252212453  |  PubMed: 39596518  |  PMC: PMC11595093

Relevance: Relevant: mentioned in keywords or abstract

Full text: PDF (769 KB)

1. Introduction

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurological disease condition characterized by difficulties in communication and social interaction and the manifestation of repetitive behaviors. The prevalence of the symptoms varies among individuals, ranges from mild to severe, and frequently impacts their daily functioning and overall quality of life [ref. 1]. It is a lifelong chronic condition which develops through a series of biological processes or environmental factors, such as inflammation or oxidative stress. This ultimately leads to a pleiotropic metabolic impact, resulting in a wide range of symptoms of ASD [ref. 2,ref. 3].

Approximately 1 in 100 children globally is thought to have autism [ref. 4]. This estimate is an average figure, and the reported prevalence differs significantly among studies. Some well-controlled studies have, however, documented figures that are substantially higher. In Italy, the prevalence of ASD is rather high, with approximately 1 in 77 children between the ages of 7 and 9 years being diagnosed with autism. Males are 4.4 times more likely than females to have ASD [ref. 5].

ASD not only affects the individuals diagnosed but also has a significant impact on their families, caregivers, and communities. Tailored assistance and treatments are necessary to effectively meet the distinct requirements and challenges faced by individuals diagnosed with ASD. This condition is diagnosed after a thorough evaluation and assessment by a qualified clinician and is primarily treated through symptomatic treatment and educational and behavioral services [ref. 6,ref. 7]. Although significant research has been conducted, there is still no medicine approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) which precisely targets the fundamental symptoms of ASD [ref. 8].

The treatment gap in ASD has led to growing interest in alternative therapies, particularly those with phytocannabinoids, which are naturally present in Cannabis sativa. Plant extract from C. sativa has been used medicinally since ancient times (approximately 2900 BC in China and 1000 BC in India), mainly for analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and hypnotic purposes [ref. 9]. The endocannabinoid system (ECS) modulates numerous bodily functions either in sickness or in health, which include exercise, appetite, sleep, inflammatory pain, mood, and memory. Endocannabinoids (eCBs) and their receptors are found in the neurological system, glands, connective tissue of internal organs, and immune system, and these eCBs are synthesized on demand and modulated by ligands [ref. 10]. The ECS is a neuro-modulatory system composed of functional endogenous eCBs, mainly anandamide (AEA) and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) [ref. 11,ref. 12], and receptors, including cannabinoid type 1 and type 2 receptors [ref. 13]. CB1 and CB2 are involved in emotional regulation and social responsiveness [ref. 14]. The underlying pathophysiologies of ASD are thought to underlie immune dysfunction, aberrant synaptic plasticity, and metabolic disturbances, and the ECS can have a modulatory role in these mechanisms [ref. 15]. Individuals with ASD often show immune dysregulation, leading to neuroinflammation and elevated cytokines such as IL-1β, TNF-α, and IL-6 [ref. 16,ref. 17]. This disrupts brain function and synaptic plasticity and contributes to social and communication challenges. ECS regulates synaptic plasticity and neurotransmission. Overactive microglia exacerbate synaptic impairments. Lower AEA levels in individuals with autism may impair social behaviors, while the ECS helps modulate neurotransmitters and protect against neuroinflammation [ref. 18]. Meanwhile, eCBs regulate cell differentiation and proliferation by activating different pathways. The process also affects the uptake and metabolism of endocannabinoids through certain enzymes like FAAH, which are responsible for the synthesis and breakdown of cannabinoids like 2-AG and AEA [ref. 19,ref. 20]. The ECS may operate differently in neurodevelopmental disorders, although the specific mechanisms involved have not yet been clearly established [ref. 21,ref. 22]. Targeting the ECS presents a promising therapeutic strategy for ASD [ref. 23,ref. 24].

It has been reported that lower concentrations of eCBs, mainly AEA in patients with ASD, have been linked to various symptoms and behavioral challenges associated with autism [ref. 25,ref. 26]. Additionally, reduced levels of oleoyl ethanolamide and palmitoyl ethanolamide have been observed in ASD patients which are related to AEA [ref. 27]. These molecules are involved in key physiological processes such as appetite regulation and neuroprotection by reducing cerebral oxidative stress through binding to PPARγ [ref. 28]. The main medically relevant constituents of the cannabis plant (phytocannabinoids) are Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), which is a psychoactive component, and cannabidiol (CBD), which has non-psychotic opposing effects and appears to have antiepileptic, anxiolytic, and neuroprotective properties [ref. 29,ref. 30]. CBD is a highly prevalent extract derived from C. sativa, and its uses were more focused in western healthcare systems during the early 19th century [ref. 31]. It has been reported to enhance social communication and behavioral regulation and decrease aggressive states of mind [ref. 32,ref. 33]. Several recent reviews have indicated that treatment with CBD-rich cannabis may possess the potential to improve fundamental ASD symptoms as well as comorbid symptoms [ref. 34,ref. 35,ref. 36]. CBD is an allosteric modulator of CB1 which antagonizes the effects of THC, which is an agonist at CB1 and produces a sense of euphoria. The major psychoactive component of cannabis is THC, which acts on the CB1 receptor in the CNS, and in comparison, CBD does not significantly affect CB1 or CB2 receptors intrinsically to produce its effects. CBD can inhibit THC’s ability to activate them fully, thereby reducing its psychoactive impact [ref. 37]. For medicinal benefits without significant euphoric symptoms, the synergistic effects of higher dosages of CBD and low traces of THC are frequently used [ref. 38]. CBD may appear to produce its effects through receptors such as glycine α3 and α1, TRPV1, TRPV2, 5-HT1A, GPR55, GABA, and PPARγ [ref. 39,ref. 40,ref. 41]. CBD has been found to raise the serum levels of AEA by inhibiting the enzyme FAAH. Additionally, it increases adenosine availability by blocking its reuptake, which may help explain its anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects [ref. 42].

Previous reviews primarily examined the impact of medicinal cannabis on different neurological health outcomes. With the increasing interest in CBD, our systematic review seeks to explore its potential benefits for ASD. The scarcity of well-controlled trials before 2020 has left a gap in the evidence regarding the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of CBD-rich cannabis as an alternative ASD treatment. Our systematic review aims to address this gap by summarizing and analyzing the latest evidence from relevant human clinical studies on autism patients only to assess the safety and efficacy of CBD-rich cannabis in alleviating ASD symptoms in both children and adults. We also try to identify and draw attention to the challenges in conducting CBD research for autism, offering guidance to overcome these barriers and promote consistency in reaching a definitive conclusion about the use of CBD in the vulnerable ASD population. This review aims to add an updated and comprehensive understanding of the current state of knowledge on this evolving topic.

2. Methods

2.1. Searching of Data

In February 2024, we performed a systematic evaluation after a thorough literature review under the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses (PRISMA) [ref. 43]. The search was carried out in two databases: PUBMED and Scopus. The search strategy for the databases was formulated using terms identified in the title or abstract, encompassing keywords associated with cannabis like cannabidiol, cannabinoids, and CBD as well as those related to autism, such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD). We used the logical operators “AND” and “OR” for terms like “autism” and “cannabinoids” to search for studies in the databases. Our focus was on reviewing the potential of CBD as a possible treatment for alleviating symptoms associated with ASD. The focus of our review was to concentrate on studies specifically related to cannabidiol in individuals diagnosed with ASD with the goal of extending our understanding of the topic (Figure 1).

2.2. Selection Criteria

Initially, we included articles published up until February 2024 in any language and which involved human populations with a diagnosis of autism. We formed a duration filter of years and included all published research articles from 2020 onward until the date of our systematic review to highlight the most updated knowledge on our topic. We encompassed study populations of all ages and genders, and they were subjected to CBD use. We excluded all animal studies, case reports, abstracts, and review articles unrelated to the topic and studies which explained cannabinoid use for autism-like signs and symptoms of other neurological disorders.

2.3. Research Screening and Data Extraction

The initial screening involved reviewing the titles and abstracts to assess relevance, and only the articles deemed relevant to the topic were thoroughly reviewed in full, as per the inclusion criteria. Additional relevant studies were identified through the screening of references. Screenings of articles were initially performed by an independent author and then reviewed independently by another author. All disagreements were resolved by discussion, and the final selection of articles was made for this review. Every final selected article underwent extraction of data. All data were collected in a uniform information sheet. The scientific data and outcomes of an article extracted by an author were reviewed by another independent author in terms of their accuracy in extraction to decrease the risk of bias. Due to heterogeneity among the studies, we employed a qualitative synthesis to compare and summarize the data from the included studies. The extracted data were summarized descriptively, highlighting key patterns and variations among observations across different studies.

3. Results and Discussion

After the initial results, we found 446 articles. We refined our search by applying a filter for articles published from the year 2020 onward, resulting in 264 articles. Among these, 67 duplicates were removed. Additionally, 192 articles were excluded based on the predefined inclusion criteria. The reasons for exclusion included incorrect publication types, such as review articles, abstracts, or case reports (33), studies focusing on other neurological symptoms associated with ASD (2), animal research (10), and articles not relevant to the topic of cannabidiol use in autism (147). Subsequently, three more articles with duplicate content were eliminated. Ultimately, we identified two articles which met our criteria and were considered for inclusion in this review. By incorporating two additional articles sourced from Google Scholar, we expanded our review to encompass a total of four published articles for this qualitative synthesis (Figure 1).

3.1. Study Layout

This study included 353 ASD diagnosed participants in total within the age range of 5–25 years. The participants were both children and adults with no gender selections. Two studies from Israel and one each from Turkey and Brazil were included. The clinical studies consisted of three prospective and one retrospective studies [ref. 44], among which one study was open-label [ref. 45] while two were randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies [ref. 46,ref. 47]. The period of study was in the range of 12–26 weeks.

Two studies had inclusion criteria for patients with ASD and behavioral problems [ref. 45,ref. 46]. One study reported 21 refusals from participation in the study prior to the treatment, with one of the reasons being behavioral problems [ref. 44]. Two studies had some participants who were under anti-epileptic treatment or anti-psychotic treatment [ref. 44,ref. 47]. The exclusion criteria of two studies were a long-term history of psychotic disorders [ref. 44,ref. 46], with a diagnosis of psychoses, schizophrenia or a schizoaffective disorder [ref. 45], and severe medical conditions which could possibly interfere with the study [ref. 47]. In all studies, participants who were on regular medications were advised to maintain their current regimens without altering them throughout the duration of the study.

3.2. Dosage of CBD-Enriched Cannabis

All studies used naturally derived medicinal cannabis products in oral dosage form with different concentrations. One study comparatively used cannabis whole plant extract and pure cannabinoids at concentrations of 167 mg/mL CBD and 8.35 mg/mL THC (6.7 mg CBD and 0.332 mg THC per drop) in drop form, respectively [ref. 46]. Others used CBD-enriched cannabis in sublingual drops at CBD concentrations of 500 mg, 1000 mg, and 2500 mg/ 30 mL with added trace THC [ref. 44], and one study used whole plant extract in drops which contained 5.7 mg CBD and 0.3 mg THC per drop [ref. 45]. Another used CBD-rich cannabis extract at a concentration of 5 mg/mL (0.5%) [ref. 47]. The medicinal cannabis extract or pure cannabinoids used had a high CBD:THC ratio of 20:1 in two studies [ref. 45,ref. 46] and 9:1 in one selected study [ref. 47], while another study used CBD preparation with full-spectrum CBD and a maximum of 0.3% trace THC [ref. 44].

We observed variations in the dosages administered in the studies. Initially, the dosage was selected according to each patient’s individual response, and adjustments were made as needed to ensure tolerability and efficacy. In one selected study, dosages ranged from 0.1 to 10 mg/kg of CBD and from 0.05 to 0.5 mg/kg of THC, with maximum doses of 420 mg of CBD and 21 mg of THC in a day [ref. 46]. Another study reported average dosages of 10 mg/kg of CBD and 0.5 mg/kg of THC, with the maximum doses not exceeding 400 mg of CBD or 20 mg of THC in a day [ref. 45]. A selected study reported an average dosage of 0.7 mg/kg, ranging from 0.3 to 2 mg/kg of CBD, with a maximum of 40 mg of CBD in a day [ref. 44]. One study used 3–70 drops per day [ref. 47].

3.3. Measuring Parameters

Among the included studies, all reported autistic participants benefit from medicinal cannabis, with improvements in their symptoms after treatment, but the measured parameters for analyzing the treatment outcomes varied. One study utilized standard measuring parameters like the Home Situations Questionnaire-Autism Spectrum Disorder (HSQ-ASD) and the Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) to target behavioral problems. The Social Responsiveness Scale, 2nd Edition (SRS-2) is a caregiver questionnaire which quantifies the severity of autism symptoms, while the Autism Parenting Stress Index (APSI) is a parent-rated measure which reflects a child’s behavior [ref. 46]. Two studies relied on clinical interviews with parents for assessment [ref. 44,ref. 47]. One study included in this review utilized standardized clinical behavioral assessments along with parent- and caretaker-based reports and the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) to assess the severity of ASD symptoms, with separate domains for social affect (SA) and restricted and repetitive behaviors (RRBs), administered by a well-trained speech therapist. The Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS-2) is a questionnaire completed by parents focusing on the behavior of a child, including social behavior. The Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale (Vineland-3) involves a parent or caretaker interview conducted by a trained professional to assess adaptive functioning. Cognitive assessments are conducted using Wechsler Intelligence Scale subtests, which evaluate cognitive abilities relative to typical age groups [ref. 45].

3.4. Potential Improvements and Adverse Effects

Improvement was found in the symptoms of ASD participants in terms of behavioral abilities, social responses, and communication [ref. 44,ref. 46,ref. 47]. No significant improvement was seen in cognitive abilities in one study [ref. 45], while only four patients (12.9%) had improved cognition, as per Bilge and Ekici [ref. 44]. There was also a significant improvement in concentration in some mild ASD participants in another study [ref. 47]. Aran et al. did not directly assess this ability among their study participants. The targeted ASD symptoms were irritability, hyperactivity, anxiety, disturbances in sleep, and aggressiveness.

Somnolence, decreased appetite [ref. 46], restlessness [ref. 44], anxiety, increased aggression [ref. 45], dizziness, colic, and weight gain [ref. 47] were the primary adverse effects noted in our studies. One study reported a dropout rate of approximately 12%, with two patients experiencing seizures, three dropping out before treatment onset, two dropping out due to ineffectiveness, and others leaving due to side effects or other reasons [ref. 46]. In another study, one patient experienced a generalized seizure, and another showed increased stereotypical behaviors, leading to discontinuation of treatment due to these side effects [ref. 44]. Additionally, 28 participants from a separate study withdrew from the trial due to lack of improvement, noncompliance, and side effects [ref. 45] (Table 1). The substantial rate of discontinuation observed in the studies significantly influenced the overall conclusions.

3.5. Evaluation of CBD Efficacy and Challenges in ASD Treatment

ASD is a lifelong illness including a wide range of neurodevelopmental problems, characterized by difficulties with social interaction, communication, and the manifestation of repetitive or restricted behaviors [ref. 1]. There has been an increasing notion that medicinal cannabis can effectively reduce the behavioral symptoms which children and adults with ASD experience [ref. 36]. Determining how well therapy with cannabinoids works is challenging due to a lack of precisely quantifiable evidence on their safety, effectiveness, and mechanism of action [ref. 46,ref. 48]. In particular, the pathophysiology of inflammation, metabolic disorders, and neurotransmitter control is not currently characterized through available approaches.

There are already about 140 different phytocannabinoids known to exist in various versatile cannabis plants, along with a vast array of terpenoids, flavonoids, and other substances [ref. 49,ref. 50]. THC and CBD are more focused phytocannabinoids due to their influence on ECS, with THC being a plant psychoactive agent and CBD seeming to have anxiolytic, antiepileptic, antipsychotic, and neuroprotective qualities [ref. 51,ref. 52]. Since there is presently no FDA-approved treatment for ASD, the intention of this systematic review was to report whether CBD-based products benefited patients with ASD over the past few years and to consider their potential as a promising treatment option for the future.

Our analysis was based on four published studies which discussed the use of cannabidiol to help adults and children with ASD manage their symptoms. Variations in the study designs, sample sizes, evaluation criteria, length of therapy, and types of complications were found in these investigations. Furthermore, we found variations among the dosage and CBD source as well as the measurement methods which were adopted in evaluating participants’ progress. Following the initiation of CBD-rich cannabis treatment, it is noteworthy that all studies documented improvements in behavioral symptoms associated with ASD, but not all patients in the selected studies benefited from CBD treatment in equal proportions. The possible reasons behind this may be differences in the source or composition of the CBD products, differences in dosage per day for individual patients, or differences in age and gender among those selected for the study population. Certain genes are thought to have particular effects on cannabis. Different outcomes while using medical cannabis may be observed in certain people who have mutations in these receptors [ref. 53]. Studies have demonstrated that certain variations in the CNR1 gene, which codes for the CB1 receptor, can affect the effectiveness of cannabinoid therapy [ref. 54]. The heterogeneity of ASD makes it extremely challenging to suggest a suitable course of treatment, and patients display differences in the efficacy and safety of medicine [ref. 55].

In summarizing the findings more precisely, the evaluation of ASD symptom improvement relied on data provided by the parents or caregivers of the patients, yet there was inconsistency and no uniformity in the selection of outcome measures across studies. Also, according to recent reviews, there is variability in the outcome measures used in ASD research [ref. 35,ref. 36]. Researchers utilized various global assessment scales or clinical questionnaires without standardization. This underscores the necessity for confined and standardized assessment tools tailored to ASD symptoms to ensure consistency, particularly when assessing responses to drugs like CBD. Such tools should need to incorporate clinical scoring assessments alongside parental evaluations to mitigate potential biases and comprehensively address core ASD symptoms.

None of the studies conducted radiological or clinical blood tests to examine the effects of CBD on bodily functions, as all participants were receiving polypharmacy treatments, primarily antipsychotics and antiepileptic medications. The combined effects and interactions of these medications were not specifically addressed in recent research. There is a notable gap in the clinical trials for elucidating the pharmacological interactions between CBD and centrally acting drugs. Many centrally acting drugs are metabolized by cytochrome P450 iso-enzymes (CYP3A4, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP2C9, and CYP1A2), which are inhibited by CBD [ref. 56,ref. 57]. Coadministration of these drugs may intensify adverse effects such as antimuscarinic syndrome, QT prolongation, and somnolence [ref. 58,ref. 59]. Future randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for ASD should focus on exploring these potential interactions, as they have the potential to alter clinical outcomes with synergistic, additive, or antagonistic effects.

Although no life-threatening effects were reported in the studies with CBD-rich cannabis, unlike those associated with major antipsychotics and other centrally acting drugs used for ASD symptoms, the observed severity of the side effects was typically mild to moderate, and they were often resolved with dose adjustments. This review underscores the importance of considering low-dose CBD to minimize the risk of adverse effects when administered alongside polypharmacy [ref. 60], as observed in our studies [ref. 44,ref. 47]. As a continuation of this, researchers found good safety outcomes for commercially available CBD-containing products administered at low daily doses in open-label [ref. 61] and double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials [ref. 62]. However, further research with larger sample sizes and reduced bias, such as in RCTs, is needed to provide more comprehensive insights into the ASD population. Common reported side effects include drowsiness, decreased appetite, weight loss, anxiety, euphoria, tiredness [ref. 46], restlessness [ref. 44], hyperactivity, increased aggression, weight gain, and intestinal colic [ref. 45,ref. 47], and some individuals reported a lack of improvement.

3.6. Regulatory and Ethical Obstacles in Conducting CBD Research for ASD

In recent years, there has been a scarcity of research regarding the medical uses of CBD for individuals with autism. Thus far, we have only conducted a few clinical trials in select parts of the world. The regulatory framework governing the medicinal use of CBD across various global locations serves as the primary constraint, thereby limiting the quantity, sample size, and quality of clinical trials conducted thus far [ref. 63,ref. 64]. The current legislative frameworks which govern the study of CBD exhibit notable variations among countries around the world, hence presenting obstacles to conducting rigorous clinical trials.

The research on cannabidiol and its effects on ASD describes a complex terrain. Previous reviews have focused on evidence from studies for the use of CBD in treating the symptoms of ASD. Our review also aimed to highlight and try to summarize the collective major challenges of conducting clinical trials on CBD in different jurisdictions of autism. However, navigating this research is challenging due to various factors. These include the unclear legal frameworks in some jurisdictions. In the European Union and other parts of the world, the legal frameworks for CBD products are ambiguous, which confuses consumers, preventing them from confidently using CBD products [ref. 65]. Different preparations containing CBD have been found to be contaminated and depend on the source origin of the cannabis. This poses a significant safety risk to consumers and requires rigorous testing and quality control measures [ref. 66]. Trust in using CBD products brings compliance in using CBD in vulnerable populations [ref. 67]. Similarly, there is a lack of standardization in the CBD market in different parts of the world due to varying potency and purity levels and the availability of limited data on the long-term effects of CBD use, which can make it difficult for researchers to ensure the safety and efficacy of the products they are using in their studies, particularly in populations like individuals with ASD. Additionally, the regulatory landscape for CBD is constantly evolving, with new regulations and guidelines being introduced, which can make it difficult for researchers to keep up to date and navigate the legal requirements. In some jurisdictions, CBD products are still considered illegal or subject to legal restrictions, which can limit the availability of CBD for research purposes and make it difficult to obtain the necessary permissions and approvals [ref. 68]. The FDA has not provided clear guidance on the use of CBD in human clinical trials, making it difficult for researchers to ensure that their studies are compliant with federal requirements [ref. 69,ref. 70]. When conducting research involving vulnerable populations like individuals with ASD, ethical considerations take priority, such as obtaining informed consent from the participants or their legal guardians and conducting thorough risk-benefit assessments to ensure that the potential benefits outweigh the risks [ref. 71]. The presence of these challenges highlights the need for concerted collaborative efforts which focus on addressing regulatory, scientific, and ethical factors in the field of CBD research for ASD. The shift from prescribed, controlled cannabis use to unregulated consumption poses significant risks for vulnerable individuals, being linked to neuropsychological deficits and other psychiatric issues. Comprehensive treatment strategies which integrate cognitive rehabilitation and ongoing support are essential to improve patient outcomes and reduce the risk of violence within this population [ref. 72]. Further research on CBD-rich cannabis is needed to clarify the causal relationships, and this requires clinical studies which create individualized treatment plans for these specific vulnerabilities.

3.7. Limitations and Future Directions

Furthermore, our systematic review was on topic-related published RCT studies as well as other clinical trials within an emerging field among researchers. This approach enabled us to offer the latest findings regarding the role of cannabidiol in ASD individuals.

The studies selected for our review exhibit several common limitations, such as small sample sizes, brief treatment durations, and variations in CBD product dosages and concentrations. Future clinical trials should address these limitations by implementing specific methodologies. These methodologies should aim to mitigate biases related to age-specific population groups, utilize standardized clinical assessment parameters, assess the impact of polypharmacy and comorbidity on clinical outcomes, evaluate CBD–drug interactions, explore dose–response relationships, and incorporate clinical investigations to assess bodily parameters. In this way, we can enhance our understanding of the efficacy and safety of CBD treatment for autism spectrum disorder.

We did not focus on ongoing clinical trials, and our review was on CBD among cannabinoids in ASD. Consequently, our database selection and scope were limited accordingly. Although the findings in our studies suggest promising results and a reduction in some ASD-related symptoms, we are unable to make conclusive comments on the role of CBD-rich cannabis in ASD. However, our review offers valuable insights that can provide guidance for future research and reviews, which might include new findings from ongoing registered or unregistered clinical studies.

4. Conclusions

Autism spectrum disorder presents a multifaceted challenge characterized by social, communicative, and behavioral difficulties. While there is growing evidence suggesting that CBD-rich cannabis could alleviate ASD symptoms, assessing its efficacy remains complex due to limited quantifiable evidence. We found social and behavioral improvement with CBD in our four selected studies with minimum adverse effects, which might be a promising alternative therapy for ASD in the future. Despite the positive outcomes observed in the studies, discrepancies in CBD product composition, dosage, and individual responses highlight the need for tailored treatment approaches. Standardized assessment tools are crucial for evaluating the efficacy of CBD consistently across multiple studies. Regulatory frameworks, ethical considerations, and challenges persist regarding the lack of clinical trials examining the interactions of CBD with other medications, necessitating further research for comprehensive insights into its safety and efficacy for ASD. Addressing these challenges requires collaborative efforts to standardize methodologies, expand sample sizes, and explore its long-term effects in ASD populations, which will ultimately enhance our understanding of its therapeutic potential.

References

1. 1. American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5American Psychiatric AssociationWashington, DC, USA2013Volume 5
2. E. Courchesne, T. Pramparo, V.H. Gazestani, M.V. Lombardo, K. Pierce, N.E. Lewis. The ASD Living Biology: From cell proliferation to clinical phenotype. Mol. Psychiatry, 2019. [DOI | PubMed]
3. W. Parker, C.D. Hornik, S. Bilbo, Z.E. Holzknecht, L. Gentry, R. Rao, S.S. Lin, M.R. Herbert, C.D. Nevison. The role of oxidative stress, inflammation and acetaminophen exposure from birth to early childhood in the induction of autism. J. Int. Med. Res., 2017. [DOI | PubMed]
4. J. Zeidan, E. Fombonne, J. Scorah, A. Ibrahim, M.S. Durkin, S. Saxena, A. Yusuf, A. Shih, M. Elsabbagh. Global prevalence of autism: A systematic review update. Autism Res., 2022. [DOI | PubMed]
5. M.L. Scattoni, L.M. Fatta, M. Micai, M.E. Sali, M. Bellomo, T. Salvitti, F. Fulceri, A. Castellano, M. Molteni, G. Gambino. Autism spectrum disorder prevalence in Italy: A nationwide study promoted by the Ministry of Health. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry Ment. Health, 2023. [DOI | PubMed]
6. M.O. Mazurek, F. Lu, E.A. Macklin, B.L. Handen. Factors associated with DSM-5 severity level ratings for autism spectrum disorder. Autism, 2019. [DOI | PubMed]
7. S.L. Hyman, S.E. Levy, S.M. Myers. Identification, evaluation, and management of children with autism spectrum disorder. Pediatrics, 2020. [DOI | PubMed]
8. B.A. Malow, T. Katz, A.M. Reynolds, A. Shui, M. Carno, H.V. Connolly, D. Coury, A.E. Bennett. Sleep difficulties and medications in children with autism spectrum disorders: A registry study. Pediatrics, 2016. [DOI | PubMed]
9. M. Touw. The religious and medicinal uses of Cannabis in China, India and Tibet. J. Psychoact. Drugs, 1981. [DOI]
10. J.A. Prenderville, Á.M. Kelly, E.J. Downer. The role of cannabinoids in adult neurogenesis. Br. J. Pharmacol., 2015. [DOI | PubMed]
11. E. Zamberletti, M. Gabaglio, D. Parolaro. The endocannabinoid system and autism spectrum disorders: Insights from animal models. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 2017. [DOI | PubMed]
12. L. Fusar-Poli, V. Cavone, S. Tinacci, I. Concas, A. Petralia, M.S. Signorelli, C.M. Díaz-Caneja, E. Aguglia. Cannabinoids for people with ASD: A systematic review of published and ongoing studies. Brain Sci., 2020. [DOI | PubMed]
13. T. Behl, R. Makkar, A. Sehgal, S. Singh, H.A. Makeen, M. Albratty, H.A. Alhazmi, A.M. Meraya, S. Bungau. Exploration of multiverse activities of endocannabinoids in biological systems. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 2022. [DOI | PubMed]
14. N.-F. Parrella, A.T. Hill, P.G. Enticott, P. Barhoun, I.S. Bower, T.C. Ford. A systematic review of cannabidiol trials in neurodevelopmental disorders. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav., 2023. [DOI | PubMed]
15. V. Nezgovorova, C. Ferretti, B. Taylor, E. Shanahan, G. Uzunova, K. Hong, O. Devinsky, E. Hollander. Potential of cannabinoids as treatments for autism spectrum disorders. J. Psychiatr. Res., 2021. [DOI | PubMed]
16. M.d.L.A. Robinson-Agramonte, E.N. García, J.F. Guerra, Y.V. Hurtado, N. Antonucci, N. Semprún-Hernández, S. Schultz, D. Siniscalco. Immune Dysregulation in Autism Spectrum Disorder: What Do We Know about It?. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 2022. [DOI | PubMed]
17. A. Erbescu, S.M. Papuc, M. Budisteanu, A. Arghir, M. Neagu. Re-emerging concepts of immune dysregulation in autism spectrum disorders. Front. Psychiatry, 2022. [DOI | PubMed]
18. T. Su, Y. Yan, Q. Li, J. Ye, L. Pei. Endocannabinoid system unlocks the puzzle of autism treatment via microglia. Front. Psychiatry, 2021. [DOI | PubMed]
19. M. Zou, Y. Liu, S. Xie, L. Wang, D. Li, L. Li, F. Wang, Y. Zhang, W. Xia, C. Sun. Alterations of the endocannabinoid system and its therapeutic potential in autism spectrum disorder. Open Biol., 2021. [DOI | PubMed]
20. E.D. Mock, B. Gagestein, M. van der Stelt. Anandamide and other N-acylethanolamines: A class of signaling lipids with therapeutic opportunities. Prog. Lipid Res., 2023. [DOI | PubMed]
21. I. Ibarra-Lecue, F. Pilar-Cuéllar, C. Muguruza, E. Florensa-Zanuy, Á. Díaz, L. Urigüen, E. Castro, A. Pazos, L.F. Callado. The endocannabinoid system in mental disorders: Evidence from human brain studies. Biochem. Pharmacol., 2018. [DOI | PubMed]
22. S. Schultz, D. Siniscalco. Endocannabinoid system involvement in autism spectrum disorder: An overview with potential therapeutic applications. AIMS Mol. Sci., 2019. [DOI]
23. R. Aishworiya, T. Valica, R. Hagerman, B. Restrepo. An update on psychopharmacological treatment of autism spectrum disorder. Neurotherapeutics, 2023. [DOI]
24. S. Pietropaolo, L. Bellocchio, I. Bouzón-Arnáiz, B.K. Yee. The role of the endocannabinoid system in autism spectrum disorders: Evidence from mouse studies. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci., 2020. [PubMed]
25. M.N. Hill, M. Haney, C.J. Hillard, D.S. Karhson, H.A. Vecchiarelli. The endocannabinoid system as a putative target for the development of novel drugs for the treatment of psychiatric illnesses. Psychol. Med., 2023. [DOI | PubMed]
26. D.S. Karhson, K.M. Krasinska, J.A. Dallaire, R.A. Libove, J.M. Phillips, A.S. Chien, J.P. Garner, A.Y. Hardan, K.J. Parker. Plasma anandamide concentrations are lower in children with autism spectrum disorder. Mol. Autism, 2018. [DOI | PubMed]
27. A. Aran, M. Eylon, M. Harel, L. Polianski, A. Nemirovski, S. Tepper, A. Schnapp, H. Cassuto, N. Wattad, J. Tam. Lower circulating endocannabinoid levels in children with autism spectrum disorder. Mol. Autism, 2019. [DOI | PubMed]
28. U. Hohmann, M. Pelzer, J. Kleine, T. Hohmann, C. Ghadban, F. Dehghani. Opposite effects of neuroprotective cannabinoids, palmitoylethanolamide, and 2-arachidonoylglycerol on function and morphology of microglia. Front. Neurosci., 2019. [DOI | PubMed]
29. A.P.d.A. Boleti, B.E.F. Frihling, P.S. e Silva, P.H.d.O. Cardoso, L.F.R. de Moraes, T.A.A. Rodrigues, M.E.F. Biembengute, H.H.F. Koolen, L. Migliolo. Biochemical aspects and therapeutic mechanisms of cannabidiol in epilepsy. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 2022. [DOI | PubMed]
30. S. Liu, Z. He, J. Li. Long-term efficacy and adverse effects of cannabidiol in adjuvant treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ther. Adv. Neurol. Disord., 2023. [DOI | PubMed]
31. R.B. Malabadi, K.P. Kolkar, R.K. Chalannavar. Medical Cannabis sativa (Marijuana or Drug type); The story of discovery of Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). Int. J. Innov. Sci. Res. Rev., 2023
32. D. Wei, D. Dinh, D. Lee, D. Li, A. Anguren, G. Moreno-Sanz, C.M. Gall, D. Piomelli. Enhancement of anandamide-mediated endocannabinoid signaling corrects autism-related social impairment. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res., 2016. [DOI | PubMed]
33. A. Manduca, E. Carbone, S. Schiavi, C. Cacchione, V. Buzzelli, P. Campolongo, V. Trezza. The neurochemistry of social reward during development: What have we learned from rodent models?. J. Neurochem., 2021. [DOI | PubMed]
34. J.F.C. Pedrazzi, F.R. Ferreira, D. Silva-Amaral, D.A. Lima, J.E.C. Hallak, A.W. Zuardi, E.A. Del-Bel, F.S. Guimarães, K.C.M. Costa, A.C. Campos. Cannabidiol for the treatment of autism spectrum disorder: Hope or hype?. Psychopharmacology, 2022. [DOI | PubMed]
35. S. Fletcher, C. Pawliuk, A. Ip, L. Huh, S.R. Rassekh, T.F. Oberlander, H. Siden. Medicinal cannabis in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder: A scoping review. Child Care Health Dev., 2022. [DOI | PubMed]
36. E.A. Silva Junior, W.M. Medeiros, N. Torro, J.M. Sousa, I.B. Almeida, F.B. Costa, K.M. Pontes, E.L. Nunes, M.D. Rosa, K.L. Albuquerque. Cannabis and cannabinoid use in autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review. Trends Psychiatry Psychother., 2021. [DOI | PubMed]
37. R. Hudson, J. Renard, C. Norris, W.J. Rushlow, S.R. Laviolette. Cannabidiol counteracts the psychotropic side-effects of δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in the ventral hippocampus through bidirectional control of erk1–2 phosphorylation. J. Neurosci., 2019. [DOI | PubMed]
38. A. Englund, D. Oliver, E. Chesney, L. Chester, J. Wilson, S. Sovi, A. De Micheli, J. Hodsoll, P. Fusar-Poli, J. Strang. Does cannabidiol make cannabis safer? A randomised, double-blind, cross-over trial of cannabis with four different CBD: THC ratios. Neuropsychopharmacology, 2023. [DOI | PubMed]
39. V. Di Marzo. The endocannabinoidome as a substrate for noneuphoric phytocannabinoid action and gut microbiome dysfunction in neuropsychiatric disorders. Dialogues Clin. Neurosci., 2020. [DOI | PubMed]
40. L. Cristino, T. Bisogno, V. Di Marzo. Cannabinoids and the expanded endocannabinoid system in neurological disorders. Nat. Rev. Neurol., 2020. [DOI | PubMed]
41. M.B. Bridgeman, D.T. Abazia. Medicinal cannabis: History, pharmacology, and implications for the acute care setting. Pharm. Ther., 2017
42. J.D. Henson, L. Vitetta, S. Hall. Tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol medicines for chronic pain and mental health conditions. Inflammopharmacology, 2022. [DOI | PubMed]
43. M.J. Page, J.E. McKenzie, P.M. Bossuyt, I. Boutron, T.C. Hoffmann, C.D. Mulrow, L. Shamseer, J.M. Tetzlaff, E.A. Akl, S.E. Brennan. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 2021. [DOI]
44. S. Bilge, B. Ekici. CBD-enriched cannabis for autism spectrum disorder: An experience of a single center in Turkey and reviews of the literature. J. Cannabis Res., 2021. [DOI | PubMed]
45. M. Hacohen, O.E. Stolar, M. Berkovitch, O. Elkana, E. Kohn, A. Hazan, E. Heyman, Y. Sobol, D. Waissengreen, E. Gal. Children and adolescents with ASD treated with CBD-rich cannabis exhibit significant improvements particularly in social symptoms: An open label study. Transl. Psychiatry, 2022. [DOI | PubMed]
46. A. Aran, M. Harel, H. Cassuto, L. Polyansky, A. Schnapp, N. Wattad, D. Shmueli, D. Golan, F.X. Castellanos. Cannabinoid treatment for autism: A proof-of-concept randomized trial. Mol. Autism, 2021. [DOI | PubMed]
47. E.A. Silva Junior, W.M. Medeiros, J.P. Santos, J.M. Sousa, F.B. Costa, K.M. Pontes, T.C. Borges, C.E. Neto Segundo, A.H. Andrade e Silva, E.L. Nunes. Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of cannabidiol-rich cannabis extract in children with autism spectrum disorder: Randomized, double-blind and controlled placebo clinical trial. Trends Psychiatry Psychother., 2022. [DOI]
48. L.B.-L. Schleider, R. Mechoulam, I. Sikorin, T. Naftali, V. Novack. Adherence, safety, and effectiveness of medical cannabis and epidemiological characteristics of the patient population: A prospective study. Front. Med., 2022. [DOI]
49. L.O. Hanuš, S.M. Meyer, E. Muñoz, O. Taglialatela-Scafati, G. Appendino. Phytocannabinoids: A unified critical inventory. Nat. Prod. Rep., 2016. [DOI | PubMed]
50. P. Berman, K. Futoran, G.M. Lewitus, D. Mukha, M. Benami, T. Shlomi, D. Meiri. A new ESI-LC/MS approach for comprehensive metabolic profiling of phytocannabinoids in Cannabis. Sci. Rep., 2018. [DOI | PubMed]
51. A.C. Campos, M.V. Fogaça, F.F. Scarante, S.R.L. Joca, A.J. Sales, F.V. Gomes, A.B. Sonego, N.S. Rodrigues, I. Galve-Roperh, F.S. Guimarães. Plastic and Neuroprotective Mechanisms Involved in the Therapeutic Effects of Cannabidiol in Psychiatric Disorders. Front. Pharmacol., 2017. [DOI | PubMed]
52. P. Cifelli, G. Ruffolo, E. De Felice, V. Alfano, E.A. van Vliet, E. Aronica, E. Palma. Phytocannabinoids in neurological diseases: Could they restore a physiological GABAergic transmission?. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 2020. [DOI | PubMed]
53. A. Agrawal, M.T. Lynskey. Candidate genes for cannabis use disorders: Findings, challenges and directions. Addiction, 2009. [DOI | PubMed]
54. M. Babayeva, Z.G. Loewy. Cannabis pharmacogenomics: A path to personalized medicine. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol., 2023. [DOI | PubMed]
55. R. Holdman, D. Vigil, K. Robinson, P. Shah, A.E. Contreras. Safety and efficacy of medical cannabis in autism spectrum disorder compared with commonly used medications. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res., 2022. [DOI | PubMed]
56. P. Balachandran, M. Elsohly, K.P. Hill. Cannabidiol Interactions with Medications, Illicit Substances, and Alcohol: A Comprehensive Review. J. Gen. Intern. Med., 2021. [DOI | PubMed]
57. S. Bansal, C.A. Zamarripa, T.R. Spindle, E.M. Weerts, K.E. Thummel, R. Vandrey, M.F. Paine, J.D. Unadkat. Evaluation of Cytochrome P450-Mediated Cannabinoid-Drug Interactions in Healthy Adult Participants. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther., 2023. [DOI | PubMed]
58. R. Huddart, J.K. Hicks, L.B. Ramsey, J.R. Strawn, D.M. Smith, M.B. Babilonia, R.B. Altman, T.E. Klein. PharmGKB summary: Sertraline pathway, pharmacokinetics. Pharmacogenetics Genom., 2020. [DOI]
59. C. Anciones, A. Gil-Nagel. Adverse effects of cannabinoids. Epileptic Disord. Int. Epilepsy J. Videotape, 2020. [DOI]
60. A. Bhaskar, A. Bell, M. Boivin, W. Briques, M. Brown, H. Clarke, C. Cyr, E. Eisenberg, R.F.d.O. Silva, E. Frohlich. Consensus recommendations on dosing and administration of medical cannabis to treat chronic pain: Results of a modified Delphi process. J. Cannabis Res., 2021. [DOI | PubMed]
61. J.L. Saleska, E.K. Pauli, P. Rezvan, O. Cobb, J. Chen, P. Thorogood, M. Backonja, C.S. Colwell, D. Loewy, E. Russo. The safety and effectiveness of commercially available cannabidiol products for health and well-being: A randomized, multi-arm, open-label waitlist-controlled trial. Integr. Med. Rep., 2022. [DOI]
62. H.L. Lopez, K.R. Cesareo, B. Raub, A.W. Kedia, J.E. Sandrock, C.M. Kerksick, T.N. Ziegenfuss. Effects of hemp extract on markers of wellness, stress resilience, recovery and clinical biomarkers of safety in overweight, but otherwise healthy subjects. J. Diet. Suppl., 2020. [DOI | PubMed]
63. J.M. Purcell, T.M. Passley, J.R. Leheste. The cannabidiol and marijuana research expansion act: Promotion of scientific knowledge to prevent a national health crisis. Lancet Reg. Health—Am., 2022. [DOI | PubMed]
64. R. Banerjee, S. Erridge, O. Salazar, N. Mangal, D. Couch, B. Pacchetti, M.H. Sodergren. Real world evidence in medical cannabis research. Ther. Innov. Regul. Sci., 2022. [DOI | PubMed]
65. I.S. McGregor, E.A. Cairns, S. Abelev, R. Cohen, M. Henderson, D. Couch, J.C. Arnold, N. Gauld. Access to cannabidiol without a prescription: A cross-country comparison and analysis. Int. J. Drug Policy, 2020. [DOI | PubMed]
66. B.E. Gidal, R. Vandrey, C. Wallin, S. Callan, A. Sutton, T.B. Saurer, J.L. Triemstra. Product labeling accuracy and contamination analysis of commercially available cannabidiol product samples. Front. Pharmacol., 2024. [DOI | PubMed]
67. S. Goodman, E. Wadsworth, G. Schauer, D. Hammond. Use and perceptions of cannabidiol products in Canada and in the United States. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res., 2022. [DOI | PubMed]
68. P. Brunetti, A.F.L. Faro, F. Pirani, P. Berretta, R. Pacifici, S. Pichini, F.P. Busardo. Pharmacology and legal status of cannabidiol. Ann. Dell’istituto Super. Sanità, 2020. [DOI]
69. J. Li, R. Carvajal, L. Bruner, N.E. Kaminski. The current understanding of the benefits, safety, and regulation of cannabidiol in consumer products. Food Chem. Toxicol., 2021. [DOI | PubMed]
70. 70. US Department of Health and Human Services Cannabis and Cannabis-Derived Compounds: Quality Considerations for Clinical Research-Guidance for IndustryFood and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation Research (CDER)Silver Spring, MD, USA2020
71. J.H. Martin, C. Hill, A. Walsh, D. Efron, K. Taylor, M. Kennedy, R. Galettis, P. Lightfoot, J. Hanson, H. Irving. Clinical trials with cannabis medicines—Guidance for ethics committees, governance officers and researchers to streamline ethics applications and ensuring patient safety: Considerations from the Australian experience. Trials, 2020. [DOI | PubMed]
72. V. Giannouli. Violence in severe mental illness: Is cognition missing in the associations with ethnicity, cannabis and alcohol?. Australas. Psychiatry, 2017. [DOI]