Hemp-Based Microfluidics

Article type: Research Article

Keywords: hemp, microfluidics, paper, diagnostics, urine diagnostics

Authors: Mikail Temirel, Sajjad Rahmani Dabbagh ⚬, Savas Tasoglu ⚬

Affiliations: Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA; mikail.temirel@uconn.edu; Department of Mechanical Engineering, Koç University, Sariyer, Istanbul 34450, Turkey; sdabbagh19@ku.edu.tr; Koç University Arçelik Research Center for Creative Industries (KUAR), Koç University, Sariyer, Istanbul 34450, Turkey; Boğaziçi Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Boğaziçi University, Çengelköy, Istanbul 34684, Turkey; Koc University Research Center for Translational Medicine, Koç University, Sariyer, Istanbul 34450, Turkey; Center for Life Sciences and Technologies, Bogazici University, Bebek, Istanbul 34470, Turkey

License: © 2021 by the authors. CC BY 4.0 Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Article links: DOI: 10.3390/mi12020182  |  PubMed: 33673025  |  PMC: PMC7917756

Relevance: Core topic: mentioned in title and keywords

Full text: PDF (2.9 MB)

1. Introduction

Global warming [ref. 1], climate change [ref. 2], the escalating demand for energy [ref. 3], the depletion of crude oil resources [ref. 4], pollution [ref. 5], deforestation [ref. 6], and growing concerns regarding environmental crises [ref. 7] have drawn the attention of both industry and academia to altering nonrenewable resources with biobased materials with low environmental impact [ref. 8,ref. 9,ref. 10,ref. 11,ref. 12,ref. 13,ref. 14]. Hemp (Cannabis sativa) is an annual plant that has applications in the food and beverage industry [ref. 15], cosmetic products [ref. 15], the textile industry [ref. 16], thermal insulators [ref. 17,ref. 18], garden products [ref. 19], biofuels [ref. 20], bio-oils [ref. 21], biofibers [ref. 22], paper fabrication [ref. 23], the refinement of water and sewage [ref. 24], nutritional supplements [ref. 25], reinforcing composites and plastics [ref. 26,ref. 27], and phytoremediation [ref. 15,ref. 28] (i.e., removing heavy metals from contaminated soil by cultivating plants). Hemp is one of the oldest plants cultivated by humans for its oil, seeds, and fiber [ref. 29], dating back 12,000 years in China, probably introduced to Europe during the Iron Age [ref. 30]. Interestingly, the Guttenberg Bible (1456) [ref. 15] and the first draft of the Declaration of Independence (1776) were printed onto hemp papers [ref. 15,ref. 31]. However, the emergence of synthetic resins and composites as well as the ease of producing paper from forests diminished the demand for hemp [ref. 30]. Finally, the cultivation of hemp was banned in the 20th century due to the plausible usage as an opiate drug [ref. 15,ref. 30].

Recently, however, numerous advantages of hemp over wood and synthetic materials have attracted more attention to this plant once again, partially due to its features including sustainability, recyclability, and high yield capacity. Hemp grows to its full size in 3–4 months, whereas it takes 20–80 years for trees [ref. 32]. Additionally, hemp yields 3–4 times more fiber than trees per hectare [ref. 32], with almost no need for pesticides, preventing soil and underground water contamination [ref. 33]. With more resistance to droughts, hemp contains a higher level of cellulose compared to wood, pointing out the superiority of hemp for paper production [ref. 33]. Furthermore, hemp papers can be recycled up to eight times, compared to only three times for wooden papers [ref. 32]. Hemp papers have more resistance to decomposition and becoming yellowish in the course of time [ref. 32] (Figure 1).

The main drawbacks of hemp-based fibers and composites, or biocomposites in general, are poor adhesion to synthetic polymers [ref. 46], degradation during curing at high temperatures [ref. 9], and humidity absorption, resulting in weaker mechanical properties compared to synthetic materials [ref. 37]. However, several studies have been conducted successfully to address the drawbacks of biocomposites by chemical as well as physical treatments and surface modifications [ref. 9,ref. 30]. Commonly used physical methods are clantering, stretching, thermotreatment, electric discharge, the production of hybrid yarns, cold plasma treatment, corona treatment, and alkalization [ref. 30]. The chemical methods include esterification, liquid ammonia, the silane coupling method, permengnates, isocynates, and graft copolymerization [ref. 30]. Furthermore, although integrating biocomposites with synthetic materials reduces the biodegradability of the final product, this hybridization brought about flexibility in design, better mechanical properties, higher impact strength [ref. 9,ref. 47], better thermal isolation [ref. 48], the capability of sound abatement [ref. 49], and lower density [ref. 46]. Overall, considering the advantages and drawbacks, hemp is a promising choice for biofuel production, oil extraction, the fabrication of interiors of automobiles, and biomedical applications, such as paper-based and polymeric microfluidic devices [ref. 19].

Microfluidic analytical devices have a wide range of applications in point-of-care diagnosis [ref. 50,ref. 51,ref. 52,ref. 53,ref. 54,ref. 55,ref. 56], clinical tests [ref. 57,ref. 58,ref. 59,ref. 60,ref. 61], food safety measurements [ref. 62], and environmental protection [ref. 63,ref. 64]. Although conventional laboratory-based analytical devices can be employed for these applications, microfluidic devices are designed to be portable and affordable, and can perform multiple tests on one device [ref. 65,ref. 66]. Laser etching [ref. 67], photolithography [ref. 68,ref. 69], plasma treatment [ref. 70], and 3D printing [ref. 71,ref. 72,ref. 73,ref. 74,ref. 75] are widely used to fabricate polymeric, glass-based, and silicone-based microfluidic devices [ref. 76,ref. 77]. However, these fabrication techniques require long design and implementation procedures and trained experts as well as expensive equipment and chemicals, challenging their suitability for mass production [ref. 76]. Using paper, on the other hand, as the base material for microfluidic devices [ref. 78,ref. 79], not only can offer the common advantages of conventional microfluidic devices, but also adds cost-effectiveness, ease of use and fabrication, rapid prototyping, biocompatibility, disposability, and no need for external power sources (e.g., pumps) [ref. 76,ref. 80]. Therefore, integrating microfluidic paper-based analytical devices (μPADs) with hemp biofibers can bring numerous advantages for producing affordable, sustainable, environmentally friendly, and functional devices for clinical as well as point-of-care applications.

Here, we propose and studied hemp paper as a substrate for the field of paper-based microfluidics. Although capillary-based microfluidic devices (apart from ordinary paper) have been reported in the literature (cotton-, cellulose-, woven-, and polymer-fiber-based) [ref. 81,ref. 82,ref. 83,ref. 84,ref. 85], to the best of our knowledge, there is no report of the use and validation of hemp paper for microfluidic applications. In this study, we investigated the water-resistant capability of several markers and characterized the effects of plotting speed as well as pattern dimensions using the pen-plotter-based approach [ref. 86], which provides single-step high-throughput patterning of hydrophobic barriers across a hemp substrate. We also characterized the wettability of hemp paper by measuring its contact angle and comparing it to that of Whatman grade 1 (WG1) paper. Moreover, we characterized the dynamics of fluid movement through hemp paper via quantifying the effects of the width and number of branches of the channel on the fluid flow through the channel as well as the effect of fluid viscosity. Additionally, we showed the impact of a hydrophobic side boundary on the imbibition of fluid into the microfluidic device. A mathematical model [ref. 87] was tested to predict the imbibition properties by comparing the experimental results. Finally, we validated hemp paper as a substrate for the detection and analysis of the potassium concentration in artificial urine.

2. Materials

A desktop pen plotter, AxiDraw (Evil Mad Scientist Laboratories, CA, USA); a laser cutter (VLS2.30 CO2 laser cutter; Universal Laser Systems, Inc., Scottsdale, AZ, USA); Deli markers with different colors (Deli group, Zhejiang, China); double-ended Comix markers (Comix group Co. Ltd., Shenzhen, China), where the fine-tip and broad-tip markers are 0.5 and 2.0 mm in diameter, respectively; 100% hemp handmade paper (Hemp Traders, Paramount, CA, USA); chromatography paper, Whatman No. 1 (GE healthcare life sciences, IL, USA).

3. Methods

The effects of markers, the plotting speed, and the pattern dimensions. To investigate the capability of the markers to create hydrophobic barriers resisting aqueous solutions on the hemp paper, we tested two commercial brands of markers including Deli and Comix (permanent ink). The patterns, circles with a diameter of 4 mm, were drawn with SolidWorks and plotted with the AxiDraw pen plotter on hemp paper. The water-resistant performance of the patterns plotted with two different colors (red and black) of Deli markers, and one color of double-ended Comix markers (both fine and broad tips) were investigated by spotting an aqueous solution of red food dye in the centers of the patterns. To increase the amount of ink diffusing through the paper, multiple passes of plotting were performed.

AxiDraw is a desktop pen plotter with an XY resolution of 80 steps per mm, a ±0.1 mm reproducibility, and a maximum plotting speed of 177 mm/s [ref. 88]. The speed is adjustable, directly affecting the amount of ink diffused through the paper and the feature size of the plotted patterns. Multiple speeds of AxiDraw, ranging from minimum (1%) to maximum (110%), were tested for plotting circle patterns (4 mm in diameter) with 1 and 3 passes to determine the best speed and number of passes. In addition, the thinnest boundary thickness and the smallest diameter circular pattern were characterized by plotting the pattern with different plotting speeds and multiple circle diameters with a Comix-fine tip, respectively.

Fluid dynamic characterization. In order to characterize the fluid flow through the paper channel, we performed fluid dynamic characterization for hemp paper as well as WG1 paper to show the effects of the channel width, the number of branches, and the fluid viscosity on the wicking distance over time. Channel patterns on the paper were designed using SolidWorks and laser-cut with the laser cutter (power, 30%; speed, 30%; z-axis, 0.07”). The paper channel widths were varied from 1 to 5 mm, with changing the channel length from 20 to 35 mm, while the number of branches was varied from 1 to 4, with a constant channel width of 2 mm. We prepared solutions with various viscosities, ranging from 1.07 to 8.75 mPa.s, by mixing D-(+)-glucose and ID water in accordance with [ref. 89]. Then, the paper channels were vertically held using a clamp on a leveled surface. Subsequently, 200 µL of the solution was applied to the bottom of the paper channel. A video was recorded with a digital camera until the fluid flow nearly stopped in the channel. Thenceforth, image processing was performed via ImageJ to measure the wicking distance over time.

Imbibition test. We used the hemp paper and WG1 paper for the imbibition test to identify the effect of a hydrophobic side boundary on the imbibition of the paper. As previously described, paper channels were prepared by either laser cutting or plotting the hydrophobic barriers with Comix ink for both papers. Then, the paper channels were placed in an upright position using a clamp, and 200 µL of DI water was put on the bottom of the paper over the test bench. Right before immersing the paper into water, we started recording a video to measure the imbibition length for 300 s. Image processing was performed via ImageJ.

Artificial urine. We prepared an artificial urine solution following our earlier work [ref. 90]. To measure the concentration of K+ cations, we used potassium-binding benzofuran isophthalate (PBFI) potassium-sensitive fluorescent probes. Hemp paper was utilized as the reaction medium on which we added the PBFI potassium-sensitive dye solutions with concentrations of 25 μM. We diluted PBFI in DMSO, as it prevents hydrolysis. We employed a microplate reader to quantify the fluorescence intensities of the PBFI potassium-sensitive fluorescent probes. We cut the hemp paper into circular shapes (Ø = 0.25 in) via a CO₂ laser cutter (VersaLaser, Scottsdale, AZ). We deposited 2 μL of PBFI on the hemp matrix, followed by 2 μL of the metal ion solution. The hemp matrices were then positioned inside the 96-well plates. The excitation/emission peaks were 360/450 nm.

4. Results and Discussion

The water-resistant capability of the markers and the characterization of the plotting speed and pattern dimensions. In this study, we plotted 4 mm-in-diameter circle patterns on the hemp paper with the maximum speed of the plotter (110%), with Comix and Deli brand permanent markers (Figure 2a). A number of the patterns plotted on the front of the paper with the Comix-fine tip and Deli-black were not clearly visible from the back, showing that an inadequate amount of ink penetrated through the paper. According to the bottom row of images in Figure 2a, the diffusion of red aqueous food dye out of the patterned circles elucidates that these two markers were not water-resistant in all the test cases with three passes at maximum speed. The results demonstrate that only the patterns plotted with the Comix-broad tip and Deli-red markers for two and three passes, at a 110% plotter speed, were able to resist the aqueous solution on the hemp paper (Figure 2a).

The effects of the plotting speed and number of passes, for 4 mm-in-diameter circular patterns plotted with different markers on the hemp paper, are illustrated in Figure 2b and Figure S1. The amount of diffused ink and, thereby, the likelihood of achieving water-resistant patterns can be augmented by decreasing the printing speed and/or increasing the number of passes. Figure 2b shows that plotting on hemp paper using the Comix-fine tip marker at a speed of 1% yields a water-resistant pattern. Additionally, by increasing the number of passes to three, water-resistant patterns can be achieved at a speed as high as 10%, which is similar to the results for the Comix-board tip for one pass. However, using the Comix-broad tip and Deli-red markers for plotting can produce water-resistant patterns at all speeds for three passes, except for the speed of 1%, which resulted in ink-filled patterns. Plotting with Deli-black, on the other hand, did not produce a water-resistant pattern for all speeds of multiple passes. Overall, the Comix-board tip and Deli-black showed the best water-resistance performance. Figure 2c summarizes the performance of the markers in creating hydrophobic barriers on the hemp paper.

Even though the Comix-board tip and Deli-red showed the best performance, the thickness of the hydrophobic boundaries was disproportionately thick, even for one pass, in terms of achieving higher resolutions. To find the thinnest boundary thickness, the Comix-fine tip with two passes was tested for different plotting speeds, ranging from 14 to 22%, by plotting 4 mm-in-diameter circle patterns (Figure 2d). We obtained the thinnest water-resistant boundary at a speed of 20% for the Comix-fine tip with two passes. In addition to optimizing the number of passes and plotting speed, to obtain the thinnest water-resistant boundary, we tested multiple circle diameters, varying from 0.7 to 2 mm, to determine the highest achievable resolution, with AxiDraw, for producing water-resistant patterns that are not ink-filled (Figure 2e). According to our results, the smallest feature that can be plotted, without being filled with ink, is a circle with a radius of 1 mm at the speed of 20% with two passes. Figure 2f illustrates the effects of the plotting speeds on the inner radius, outer radius, and line thickness of the plotted patterns, with a diameter of 4 mm, using the Comix-fine tip at a speed of 20% and two passes. Based on this figure, an increase in plotting speed decreased the outer radius and thickness, whereas the inner radius increased. We analyzed the captured images after plotting, with a MATLAB script, to measure the inner and outer radii of the plotted circles and the thickness (i.e., the differences between the outer radius and inner radius) at eight different points (shown as an inset image (at angles of 0–315° with an interval of 45°)) (Figure 2f).

Physical characterization.Figure 3a,b display scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of the isometric view of the surface and cross-section of the hemp paper at 300× magnification, and focused cross-section of the hemp paper at 2250× magnification, respectively. In order to characterize the pore structure and cellulose fibers, the surface of the hemp paper was also imaged at 500× and 5000× magnification, as presented in Figure 3c,d, respectively. Figure 3e–h show SEM images surface and cross-section of WG1 paper under different magnifications. In addition, we measured the contact angle of water on both the hemp paper and WG1 paper by coating the paper surface with Comix ink, as illustrated in Figure 3i,j, respectively. The quantitative results are shown in Figure 3k. The contact angle of water on the hemp paper was about 4% less than that on the WG1 paper. The result proves that hemp paper has a significant capacity, as capable as WG1 paper, regarding the hydrophobic feature of the paper.

The results of the fluid dynamic characterization.Figure 4 depicts the fluid dynamic characterization of the hemp paper and WG1 paper at room temperature. Figure 4a shows the effect of the channel width on the wicking distance, over 400 s, for the hemp paper. In addition, it shows a comparison of our experimental results for hemp paper with experimental results for WG1 paper from [ref. 91], in terms of the impact of the channel width on the wicking distance. As seen in Figure 4a, similar to for WG1 paper, the channel width has no significant influence on the wicking distance on hemp paper, so the wicking distance was virtually equal for channel widths varying from 1 to 5 mm. The underlying reason is that a unit square piece of paper, in the vertical direction, absorbs and transfers the liquid to the upper unit piece in equal time compared to its neighbors in the horizontal direction. Thus, the wicking speed in the vertical direction is independent of the channel width. Additionally, it was observed that WG1 paper absorbs water faster than hemp paper, potentially due to its larger pore structure as well as higher absorbance capacity. Figure S2 shows representative images of fluid wicking on hemp paper with varying channel widths for 410 s. For further fluid dynamic characterizations, channels with a width of 2 mm were chosen.

The effect of branching channels on the fluid flow through the paper channel was also characterized. Figure 4b illustrates the wicking distances of multiple numbers of branches, from 1 to 4, for 180 s for hemp paper, and for 60 s for WG1 [ref. 91], with a 2 mm constant channel width. The WG1 paper had a faster diffusion speed than the hemp paper because of its higher absorbing capacity. Increasing the number of branches from 1 to 4 led to no significant differences in the wicking distance for the first 60 s on the hemp paper. However, after 180 s, the wicking distance for a single channel was approximately 18% more than a four-branch channel. Likewise, the WG1 paper experienced a 14% decrease in the wicking distance as a result of branching, demonstrating performance of hemp paper similar to that of WG1 paper, a commonly used substrate for paper-based microfluidic devices. Figure S3 illustrates images of the fluid wicking distance on the hemp paper, over 400 s, with the number of branches varying from 1 to 4.

Since paper-based microfluidic devices are used for different fluids with various viscosities, the viscosity of the solution is a decisive factor for the efficiency of paper-based devices. In order to characterize the effect of fluid viscosity on the wicking distance, either for hemp paper or WG1 paper, we tested varying viscosities ranging from 1.07 to 8.75 mPa.s (Figure 4c). The wicking distance decreased with increasing fluid viscosity for both papers. The wicking distance of the highest-viscosity solution (8.75 mPa.s) compared to that of the lowest-viscosity solution (1.07 mPa.s) was 83.3% lower on hemp paper and 68% lower for WG1 paper. For the solution with the lowest viscosity, 5 min was needed to reach a 15 mm wicking distance on the hemp paper, explaining the potency of hemp paper for the analysis of low-viscosity solutions such as urine. Figure S4 shows representative photographs of the wicking of solutions with different viscosities in the microfluidic channel made from hemp paper. Figure 4d displays images of fluid wicking through a hemp paper-based microfluidic channel with four branches. The red dye was mixed with the solution for better visualization.

Although we showed that the wicking distance is independent of the channel width for paper channels with laser-cut boundaries, the channel width affects the wicking distance for paper channels with hydrophobic side boundaries. Narrowing down the width of a channel with hydrophobic side boundaries results in decreasing the wicking speed and distance [ref. 87]. While the Washburn Equation (1) is valid for laser-cut paper channels, in order to apply the Washburn equation to narrow paper-based channels with hydrophobic side boundaries, this equation needs to be modified (2) [ref. 87]. The Washburn equation and modified Washburn equation are as follows:

where k is the proportional constant; σ, the surface tension; μ, the viscosity of the liquid; ω, the channel width; ϕ, the porosity of the paper; d, the pore diameter; θ, the contact angle; θ_b, the contact angle on the side boundaries; t, the time; and β is introduced to consider the length of the advancing contact lines in contact with the hydrophobic side boundaries [ref. 87]. The modified Washburn equation has two coefficients (k and β) that should be determined experimentally by fitting a mathematical model on the experimental test results. Figure 5a represents paper channels with hydrophobic and laser-cut boundaries. Figure 5b illustrates our experimental results for hemp paper and fitted curves. Our experiment yielded R-squared values of 0.9535 and 0.9278 for laser-cut and hydrophobic boundaries on hemp paper (i.e., approximately 95.35% and 92.78% of the observed variation can be explained by the modified Washburn model for laser-cut and hydrophobic boundaries on hemp paper, respectively). Besides, the R-squared values for WG1 paper were calculated to be 0.9154 and 0.9470 for laser-cut and hydrophobic boundaries, respectively. Figure 5b demonstrates that the channels with hydrophobic side boundaries had shorter wicking distances on both papers, owing to the surface tension at the boundaries acting in an inverse direction to the flow direction. Moreover, we found that hemp paper-based channels had acceptable compliance with the modified Washburn equation, enabling the use of this equation in the design process for hemp-based microfluidic channels.

Finally, we synthesized a solution of artificial urine with a wide range of ion concentrations following a protocol reported earlier by us and others [ref. 90]. We used a plate reader to quantify the fluorescent intensity of K+ cations. Figure 6 demonstrates the results of detecting K+ ions in the artificial urine. The fluorescent intensity ratio, as a function of the concentration, can be expressed as I/I₀ = A-B*exp(−αC), where I and I₀ are the intensities of the solution with and without the target ion, respectively; α is the saturation decay constant; C is the ion concentration in the solution; and A and B are constants. The results show that by increasing the concentration of potassium from 4.8 to 120 mM within the physiological range, the fluorescent probe intensity increased by 109.4%.

5. Discussion and Conclusions

Hemp is a sustainable, economical, renewable, and environmentally friendly substitute for the paper that has not been developed to its full potential due to the legal impediments, limited land under cultivation in the world, lack of infrastructures for processing the raw hemp to end products, and inadequate conducted studies exploring the drawbacks as well as the potential of hemp for prospective commercial products. This study characterized the capabilities of hemp as a substrate for the single-step, rapid prototyping of mass-producible paper-based microfluidic devices. Using a simple desktop pen plotter and markers, hydrophobic barriers (circles with 4 mm diameters) were plotted on hemp paper to examine the potential of the markers to form water-resistant patterns. Additionally, different plotting speeds and numbers of passes of the marker, as decisive factors for the amount of ink diffusing through the paper, were tested to find the optimized quantities for these factors. It was concluded that the Comix-broad tip and Deli-red markers can create water-resistant patterns at all speeds (1–110%) with three passes, except for 1%, which resulted in an ink-filled pattern. Conversely, Deli-black was not able to create water-resistant barriers at all, neither with changing the plotting speed nor with varying the number of passes. Furthermore, in order to achieve higher resolutions, the thinnest and smallest possible water-resistant patterns were investigated. The thinnest water-resistant pattern was achieved with the Comix-fine tip with a speed of 20% and two passes. The smallest plottable pattern, not being filled by ink, was a 1 mm-in-diameter circle, drawn with AxiDraw at the speed of 20% and two passes.

Moreover, the maximum wicking distance and time needed for wicking, as important parameters for determining the functionality of paper-based microfluidic devices, were compared for both hemp paper and WG1 paper. Upon examining different channel widths, no significant discrepancies between wicking distances were recorded for various channel widths with laser-cut boundaries on hemp paper. Therefore, thinner laser-cut channels can be used in hemp-based microfluidic devices to diminish the required amounts of pricey samples and reagents for tests. Nonetheless, channels with hydrophobic side boundaries experienced a decline in wicking distance as a result of narrowing down the channel width. In this regard, a modified version of the Washburn equation is presented, which was in consensus with our experimental results for the wicking length in hemp paper-based channels with hydrophobic boundaries. Hence, the modified Washburn equation can be used to design and predict the wicking length on hemp paper-based microfluidic devices. Besides, owing to the larger pore structure and higher absorbance capability, WG1 wicks viscous fluids faster than hemp paper. However, their performance was comparable for low-viscosity fluids such as urine. Hence, in order to overcome the lower wicking speeds in hemp, we suggest increasing the packing density of hemp-based microfluidic devices by simple techniques such as origami, adhesives, or high-resolution patterning [ref. 80]. Densely packed devices benefit from shorter channels from the input to reaction zones, decreasing the time required for testing with hemp-based devices. Furthermore, the wettability of hemp and WG1 paper was compared by measuring their contact angles, proving a similar capability of hemp to WG1 paper regarding the hydrophobic nature of the paper. In addition, the effect of branching on the wicking distance was studied on hemp paper, showing no significant discrepancy between the wicking distances of a single and four-branch channel for the first 60 s of wicking. However, for the same channels, after 180 s, the wicking distance of a single channel was virtually 18% more than the four-branch channel.

The modifiable pore size, biocompatibility, and porous structure of paper provide a natural support medium, emulating the cellular microenvironment physically, for culturing cells for disease model construction, cell differentiation, and single-cell analysis [ref. 92]. However, although the use of different materials (e.g., Teflon [ref. 93]) was reported to enhance cell adhesion, the adhesion of cells to the paper substrate is still a challenge to be addressed, particularly in long-term cultures (more than a week) [ref. 92]. Furthermore, the paper substrate has limitations for cell applications that demand continuous perfusion [ref. 92]. Hybrid microfluidic devices have been reported [ref. 94,ref. 95] to overcome this limitation, while further research may extend the applicability of paper-based microfluidic devices for cell culture and tissue engineering applications. The integration of microfluidics with electronic sensors can offer higher sensitivity [ref. 96]. The inkjet printing of silver nanoparticles, to produce high-resolution conductive electronic sensors on nitrocellulose, was reported previously [ref. 97]. The main challenges were achieving lower printing resolutions and uninterrupted conductivity [ref. 98]. Future studies could evaluate the possibility of printing conductive material on hemp substrates to form electronic sensors. Overall, intriguing topics for future research could include exploring other possible applications of hemp in the fabrication of low-cost test devices, employing machine-learning methods [ref. 99] to quantify hemp-based assays more accurately, solving present issues (e.g., slow wicking speeds), and developing startups to fabricate innovative products such as hemp-based menstrual pads [ref. 100] that are UV-resistant, anti-bacterial/inflammatory/fungal, reusable, and biodegradable.

References

1. J.R. Oakleaf, C.M. Kennedy, S. Baruch-Mordo, J.S. Gerber, P.C. West, J.A. Johnson, J. Kiesecker. Mapping global development potential for renewable energy, fossil fuels, mining and agriculture sectors. Sci. Data, 2019. [DOI | PubMed]
2. C. Albouy, V. Delattre, G. Donati, T.L. Frölicher, S. Albouy-Boyer, M. Rufino, L. Pellissier, D. Mouillot, F. Leprieur. Global vulnerability of marine mammals to global warming. Sci. Rep., 2020. [DOI | PubMed]
3. G.P. Peters, R.M. Andrew, J.G. Canadell, P. Friedlingstein, R.B. Jackson, J.I. Korsbakken, C. Le Quéré, A. Peregon. Carbon dioxide emissions continue to grow amidst slowly emerging climate policies. Nat. Clim. Chang., 2020. [DOI]
4. P. Ibarra-Gonzalez, B.-G. Rong. A review of the current state of biofuels production from lignocellulosic biomass using thermochemical conversion routes. Chin. J. Chem. Eng., 2019. [DOI]
5. J. Kotcher, E. Maibach, W.-T. Choi. Fossil fuels are harming our brains: Identifying key messages about the health effects of air pollution from fossil fuels. BMC Public Health, 2019. [DOI | PubMed]
6. J.H. Ellwanger, B. Kulmann-Leal, V.L. Kaminski, J. Valverde-Villegas, A.B.G. Veiga, F.R. Spilki, P.M. Fearnside, L. Caesar, L.L. Giatti, G.L. Wallau. Beyond diversity loss and climate change: Impacts of Amazon deforestation on infectious diseases and public health. An. Acad. Bras. Cienc., 2020. [DOI | PubMed]
7. G.C. Johnson, J.M. Lyman. Warming trends increasingly dominate global ocean. Nat. Clim. Chang., 2020. [DOI]
8. Ó. Ögmundarson, M.J. Herrgård, J. Forster, M.Z. Hauschild, P. Fantke. Addressing environmental sustainability of biochemicals. Nat. Sustain., 2020. [DOI]
9. A.Q. Dayo, A. Zegaoui, A.A. Nizamani, S. Kiran, J. Wang, M. Derradji, W.-A. Cai, W.-B. Liu. The influence of different chemical treatments on the hemp fiber/polybenzoxazine based green composites: Mechanical, thermal and water absorption properties. Mater. Chem. Phys., 2018. [DOI]
10. L. Peng, D. Fu, H. Chu, Z. Wang, H. Qi. Biofuel production from microalgae: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett., 2020. [DOI]
11. W. Liu, T. Chen, M.-E. Fei, R. Qiu, D. Yu, T. Fu, J. Qiu. Properties of natural fiber-reinforced biobased thermoset biocomposites: Effects of fiber type and resin composition. Compos. Part B Eng., 2019. [DOI]
12. M.I.J. Ibrahim, S.M. Sapuan, E.S. Zainudin, M.Y.M. Zuhri. Potential of using multiscale corn husk fiber as reinforcing filler in cornstarch-based biocomposites. Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 2019. [DOI | PubMed]
13. Y.F. Tsang, V. Kumar, P. Samadar, Y. Yang, J. Lee, Y.S. Ok, H. Song, K.-H. Kim, E.E. Kwon, Y.J. Jeon. Production of bioplastic through food waste valorization. Environ. Int., 2019. [DOI | PubMed]
14. T.O. Ranaivoarisoa, R. Singh, K. Rengasamy, M.S. Guzman, A. Bose. Towards sustainable bioplastic production using the photoautotrophic bacterium Rhodopseudomonas palustris TIE-1. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2019. [DOI | PubMed]
15. G. Crini, E. Lichtfouse, G. Chanet, N. Morin-Crini. Applications of hemp in textiles, paper industry, insulation and building materials, horticulture, animal nutrition, food and beverages, nutraceuticals, cosmetics and hygiene, medicine, agrochemistry, energy production and environment: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett., 2020. [DOI]
16. A.G.D. Schumacher, S. Pequito, J. Pazour. Industrial hemp fiber: A sustainable and economical alternative to cotton. J. Clean. Prod., 2020. [DOI]
17. S. Nguyen, A. Tran-Le, M. Vu, Q. To, O. Douzane, T. Langlet. Modeling thermal conductivity of hemp insulation material: A multi-scale homogenization approach. Build. Environ., 2016. [DOI]
18. M. Carus, L. Sarmento. The European Hemp Industry: Cultivation, processing and applications for fibres, shivs, seeds and flowers. Eur. Ind. Hemp Assoc., 2017
19. G. Crini, E. Lichtfouse, G. Chanet, N. Morin-Crini. Traditional and New Applications of Hemp. Sustainable Agriculture Reviews 42, 2020
20. A. Jasinskas, D. Streikus, T. Vonžodas. Fibrous hemp (Felina 32, USO 31, Finola) and fibrous nettle processing and usage of pressed biofuel for energy purposes. Renew. Energy, 2020. [DOI]
21. V. Devi, S. Khanam. Comparative study of different extraction processes for hemp (Cannabis sativa) seed oil considering physical, chemical and industrial-scale economic aspects. J. Clean. Prod., 2019. [DOI]
22. A. Vinod, M.R. Sanjay, S. Suchart, P. Jyotishkumar. Renewable and sustainable biobased materials: An assessment on biofibers, biofilms, biopolymers and biocomposites. J. Clean. Prod., 2020. [DOI]
23. N.S. Amode, P. Jeetah. Paper Production from Mauritian Hemp Fibres. Waste Biomass Valorization, 2020. [DOI]
24. L. Deng, D. Zhang, Z. Kong, L. He, Q. Guan, P. Ning. Strong Immobilization of Phosphate in Wastewater onto the Surface of MgO-Modified Industrial Hemp-Stem-Driven Biochar by Flowerlike Crystallization. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2020. [DOI]
25. B. Farinon, R. Molinari, L. Costantini, N. Merendino. The Seed of Industrial Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.): Nutritional Quality and Potential Functionality for Human Health and Nutrition. Nutrients, 2020. [DOI]
26. C.M. Miriţoiu, M.M. Stănescu, C.O. Burada, D. Bolcu, A. Pădeanu, A. Bolcu. Comparisons between some composite materials reinforced with hemp fibers. Mater. Today Proc., 2019. [DOI]
27. S. Musio, J. Müssig, S. Amaducci. Optimizing hemp fiber production for high performance composite applications. Front. Plant Sci., 2018. [DOI | PubMed]
28. P. Linger, J. Müssig, H. Fischer, J. Kobert. Industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) growing on heavy metal contaminated soil: Fibre quality and phytoremediation potential. Ind. Crop. Prod., 2002. [DOI]
29. C. Ingrao, A.L. Giudice, J. Bacenetti, C. Tricase, G. Dotelli, M. Fiala, V. Siracusa, C. Mbohwa. Energy and environmental assessment of industrial hemp for building applications: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 2015. [DOI]
30. A. Shahzad. Hemp fiber and its composites–A review. J. Compos. Mater., 2012. [DOI]
31. P. Bouloc. Hemp: Industrial Production and Uses, 2013
32. E. Malachowska, P. Przybysz, M. Dubowik, M. Kucner, K. Buzala. Comparison of papermaking potential of wood and hemp cellulose pulps. Ann. Wars. Univ. Life Sci. SGGW For. Wood Technol., 2015
33. M.S.U. Rehman, N. Rashid, A. Saif, T. Mahmood, J.-I. Han. Potential of bioenergy production from industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa) Pakistan perspective. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 2013. [DOI]
34. C. Kaiser, C. Cassady, M. Ernst. Industrial hemp production. Cent. Crop. Diversif. Univ. Ky. Sept., 2015
35. D. Dupeyre, M. Vignon. Fibres from semi-retted hemp bundles by steam explosion treatment. Biomass Bioenergy, 1998
36. M. Lavrieux, J. Jacob, J.-R. Disnar, J.-G. Bréhéret, C. Le Milbeau, Y. Miras, V. Andrieu-Ponel. Sedimentary cannabinol tracks the history of hemp retting. Geology, 2013. [DOI]
37. H. Fang, Y. Zhang, J. Deng, D. Rodrigue. Effect of fiber treatment on the water absorption and mechanical properties of hemp fiber/polyethylene composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2013. [DOI]
38. T. Jami, S. Karade, L. Singh. A review of the properties of hemp concrete for green building applications. J. Clean. Prod., 2019. [DOI]
39. I.N. Grubeša, B. Marković, A. Gojević, J. Brdarić. Effect of hemp fibers on fire resistance of concrete. Constr. Build. Mater., 2018. [DOI]
40. Y. Abdellatef, M. Kavgic. Thermal, microstructural and numerical analysis of hempcrete-microencapsulated phase change material composites. Appl. Therm. Eng., 2020. [DOI]
41. İ. Demir, C. Doğan. Physical and Mechanical Properties of Hempcrete. Open Waste Manag. J., 2020. [DOI]
42. M. Närep. Industrial Hemp Based Insulation Materials and Their Properties. Master’s Thesis, 2017
43. R. Mirski, P. Boruszewski, A. Trociński, D. Dziurka. The possibility to use long fibres from fast growing hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) for the production of boards for the building and furniture industry. BioResources, 2017. [DOI]
44. M.A. Azeez. Pulping of non-woody biomass. Pulp Pap. Process., 2018. [DOI]
45. P. Bajpai. Basic overview of pulp and paper manufacturing process. Green Chemistry and Sustainability in Pulp and Paper Industry, 2015
46. T. Sullins, S. Pillay, A. Komus, H. Ning. Hemp fiber reinforced polypropylene composites: The effects of material treatments. Compos. Part B Eng., 2017. [DOI]
47. A. Shahzad. Impact and fatigue properties of hemp–glass fiber hybrid biocomposites. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos., 2011. [DOI]
48. R. Muthuraj, C. Lacoste, P. Lacroix, A. Bergeret. Sustainable thermal insulation biocomposites from rice husk, wheat husk, wood fibers and textile waste fibers: Elaboration and performances evaluation. Ind. Crop. Prod., 2019. [DOI]
49. S. Panthapulakkal, M. Sain. Injection-molded short hemp fiber/glass fiber-reinforced polypropylene hybrid composites—Mechanical, water absorption and thermal properties. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2007. [DOI]
50. S. Tasoglu, H.C. Tekin, F. Inci, S. Knowlton, S. Wang, F. Wang-Johanning, G. Johanning, D. Colevas, U. Demirci. Advances in nanotechnology and microfluidics for human papillomavirus diagnostics. Proc. IEEE, 2015. [DOI]
51. S. Knowlton, I. Sencan, Y. Aytar, J. Khoory, M. Heeney, I. Ghiran, S. Tasoglu. Sickle cell detection using a smartphone. Sci. Rep., 2015. [DOI | PubMed]
52. S. Knowlton, A. Joshi, P. Syrrist, A.F. Coskun, S. Tasoglu. 3D-printed smartphone-based point of care tool for fluorescence-and magnetophoresis-based cytometry. Lab Chip, 2017. [DOI | PubMed]
53. S. Knowlton, C.H. Yu, N. Jain, I.C. Ghiran, S. Tasoglu. Smart-phone based magnetic levitation for measuring densities. PLoS ONE, 2015. [DOI | PubMed]
54. B. Yenilmez, S. Knowlton, C.H. Yu, M.M. Heeney, S. Tasoglu. Label-free sickle cell disease diagnosis using a low—cost, handheld platform. Adv. Mater. Technol., 2016. [DOI]
55. B. Yenilmez, S. Knowlton, S. Tasoglu. Self-contained handheld magnetic platform for point of care cytometry in biological samples. Adv. Mater. Technol., 2016. [DOI]
56. C.M. Pandey, S. Augustine, S. Kumar, S. Kumar, S. Nara, S. Srivastava, B.D. Malhotra. Microfluidics based point-of-care diagnostics. Biotechnol. J., 2018. [DOI]
57. W.-B. Lee, C.-Y. Fu, W.-H. Chang, H.-L. You, C.-H. Wang, M.S. Lee, G.-B. Lee. A microfluidic device for antimicrobial susceptibility testing based on a broth dilution method. Biosens. Bioelectron., 2017. [DOI | PubMed]
58. S. Tasoglu, H. Safaee, X. Zhang, J.L. Kingsley, P.N. Catalano, U.A. Gurkan, A. Nureddin, E. Kayaalp, R.M. Anchan, R.L. Maas. Exhaustion of racing sperm in nature-mimicking microfluidic channels during sorting. Small, 2013. [DOI | PubMed]
59. S. Knowlton, S. Tasoglu. A bioprinted liver-on-a-chip for drug screening applications. Trends Biotechnol., 2016. [DOI | PubMed]
60. S.M. Knowlton, M. Sadasivam, S. Tasoglu. Microfluidics for sperm research. Trends Biotechnol., 2015. [DOI | PubMed]
61. S. Knowlton, A. Joshi, B. Yenilmez, I.T. Ozbolat, C.K. Chua, A. Khademhosseini, S. Tasoglu. Advancing cancer research using bioprinting for tumor-on-a-chip platforms. Int. J. Bioprinting, 2016. [DOI]
62. X. Weng, S. Neethirajan. Ensuring food safety: Quality monitoring using microfluidics. Trends Food Sci. Technol., 2017. [DOI]
63. R. Pol, F. Céspedes, D. Gabriel, M. Baeza. Microfluidic lab-on-a-chip platforms for environmental monitoring. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem., 2017. [DOI]
64. B. Ozdalgic, M. Ustun, S.R. Dabbagh, B.Z. Haznedaroglu, A. Kiraz, S. Tasoglu. Microfluidics for Microalgal Biotechnology. Biotechnol. Bioeng., 2021. [DOI | PubMed]
65. J.H. Panchal, N.J. Kent, A.J. Knox, L.F. Harris. Microfluidics in haemostasis: A review. Molecules, 2020. [DOI | PubMed]
66. R. Amin, S. Knowlton, B. Yenilmez, A. Hart, A. Joshi, S. Tasoglu. Smart-phone attachable, flow-assisted magnetic focusing device. RSC Adv., 2016. [DOI]
67. K.L. Wlodarczyk, R.M. Carter, A. Jahanbakhsh, A.A. Lopes, M.D. Mackenzie, R.R. Maier, D.P. Hand, M.M. Maroto-Valer. Rapid laser manufacturing of microfluidic devices from glass substrates. Micromachines, 2018. [DOI | PubMed]
68. J. Christoffersson, C.-F. Mandenius. Fabrication of a microfluidic cell culture device using photolithographic and soft lithographic techniques. Cell-Based Assays Using iPSCs for Drug Development and Testing, 2019
69. Z. Luo, S. Güven, I. Gozen, P. Chen, S. Tasoglu, R.M. Anchan, B. Bai, U. Demirci. Deformation of a single mouse oocyte in a constricted microfluidic channel. Microfluid. Nanofluid., 2015. [DOI | PubMed]
70. B. Mészáros, G. Járvás, L. Hajba, M. Szigeti, A. Dallos, A. Guttman. Quantitative characterization of plasma treated PDMS microfluidic substrates by inverse gas chromatography. Sens. Actuators B Chem., 2018. [DOI]
71. R.D. Sochol, E. Sweet, C.C. Glick, S.-Y. Wu, C. Yang, M. Restaino, L. Lin. 3D printed microfluidics and microelectronics. Microelectron. Eng., 2018. [DOI]
72. R. Amin, S. Knowlton, A. Hart, B. Yenilmez, F. Ghaderinezhad, S. Katebifar, M. Messina, A. Khademhosseini, S. Tasoglu. 3D-printed microfluidic devices. Biofabrication, 2016. [DOI | PubMed]
73. S.R. Dabbagh, M.R. Sarabi, R. Rahbarghazi, E. Sokullu, A.K. Yetisen, S. Tasoglu. 3D-Printed Microneedles in Biomedical Applications. iScience, 2020. [DOI | PubMed]
74. S. Knowlton, B. Yenilmez, S. Tasoglu. Towards single-step biofabrication of organs on a chip via 3D printing. Trends Biotechnol., 2016. [DOI | PubMed]
75. S. Knowlton, C.H. Yu, F. Ersoy, S. Emadi, A. Khademhosseini, S. Tasoglu. 3D-printed microfluidic chips with patterned, cell-laden hydrogel constructs. Biofabrication, 2016. [DOI | PubMed]
76. F. Ghaderinezhad, R. Amin, M. Temirel, B. Yenilmez, A. Wentworth, S. Tasoglu. High-throughput rapid-prototyping of low-cost paper-based microfluidics. Sci. Rep., 2017. [DOI | PubMed]
77. D.I. Walsh, D.S. Kong, S.K. Murthy, P.A. Carr. Enabling Microfluidics: From Clean Rooms to Makerspaces. Trends Biotechnol., 2017. [DOI | PubMed]
78. A.W. Martinez, S.T. Phillips, M.J. Butte, G.M. Whitesides. Patterned paper as a platform for inexpensive, low-volume, portable bioassays. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2007. [DOI]
79. E. Lepowsky, F. Ghaderinezhad, S. Knowlton, S. Tasoglu. Paper-based assays for urine analysis. Biomicrofluidics, 2017. [DOI | PubMed]
80. S.R. Dabbagh, E. Becher, F. Ghaderinezhad, H. Havlucu, O. Ozcan, M. Ozkan, A.K. Yetisen, S. Tasoglu. Increasing the Packing Density of Assays in Paper-Based Microfluidic Devices. Biomicrofluidics, 2021. [DOI]
81. A. Nilghaz, D.H. Wicaksono, D. Gustiono, F.A.A. Majid, E. Supriyanto, M.R.A. Kadir. Flexible microfluidic cloth-based analytical devices using a low-cost wax patterning technique. Lab Chip, 2012. [DOI | PubMed]
82. P. Wu, C. Zhang. Low-cost, high-throughput fabrication of cloth-based microfluidic devices using a photolithographical patterning technique. Lab Chip, 2015. [DOI | PubMed]
83. J. Berthier, K. Brakke, D. Gosselin, E. Berthier, F. Navarro. Thread-based microfluidics: Flow patterns in homogeneous and heterogeneous microfiber bundles. Med. Eng. Phys., 2017. [DOI | PubMed]
84. W. Guan, M. Liu, C. Zhang. Electrochemiluminescence detection in microfluidic cloth-based analytical devices. Biosens. Bioelectron., 2016. [DOI | PubMed]
85. S.-H. Jeon, K.-H. Hwang, J.S. Lee, J.-H. Boo, S.H. Yun. Plasma treatments of wool fiber surface for microfluidic applications. Mater. Res. Bull., 2015. [DOI]
86. R. Amin, F. Ghaderinezhad, L. Li, E. Lepowsky, B. Yenilmez, S. Knowlton, S. Tasoglu. Continuous-ink, multiplexed pen-plotter approach for low-cost, high-throughput fabrication of paper-based microfluidics. Anal. Chem., 2017. [DOI | PubMed]
87. S. Hong, W. Kim. Dynamics of water imbibition through paper channels with wax boundaries. Microfluid. Nanofluid., 2015. [DOI]
88. R. Amin, F. Ghaderinezhad, C. Bridge, M. Temirel, S. Jones, P. Toloueinia, S. Tasoglu. Pushing the Limits of Spatial Assay Resolution for Paper-Based Microfluidics Using Low-Cost and High-Throughput Pen Plotter Approach. Micromachines, 2020. [DOI]
89. V.R.N. Telis, J. Telis-Romero, H. Mazzotti, A.L. Gabas. Viscosity of aqueous carbohydrate solutions at different temperatures and concentrations. Int. J. Food Prop., 2007. [DOI]
90. F. Ghaderinezhad, H.C. Koydemir, D. Tseng, D. Karinca, K. Liang, A. Ozcan, S. Tasoglu. Sensing of electrolytes in urine using a miniaturized paper-based device. Sci. Rep., 2020. [DOI | PubMed]
91. A.K. Yetisen, N. Jiang, A. Tamayol, G.U. Ruiz-Esparza, Y.S. Zhang, S. Medina-Pando, A. Gupta, J.S. Wolffsohn, H. Butt, A. Khademhosseini. Paper-based microfluidic system for tear electrolyte analysis. Lab Chip, 2017. [DOI | PubMed]
92. J. Ma, S. Yan, C. Miao, L. Li, W. Shi, X. Liu, Y. Luo, T. Liu, B. Lin, W. Wu. Paper microfluidics for cell analysis. Adv. Healthc. Mater., 2019. [DOI]
93. F. Deiss, W.L. Matochko, N. Govindasamy, E.Y. Lin, R. Derda. Flow-through synthesis on teflon—patterned paper to produce peptide arrays for cell—based assays. Angew. Chem., 2014. [DOI]
94. B. Hong, P. Xue, Y. Wu, J. Bao, Y.J. Chuah, Y. Kang. A concentration gradient generator on a paper-based microfluidic chip coupled with cell culture microarray for high-throughput drug screening. Biomed. Microdevices, 2016. [DOI | PubMed]
95. K.F. Lei, C.-H. Chang, M.-J. Chen. Paper/PMMA hybrid 3D cell culture microfluidic platform for the study of cellular crosstalk. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2017. [DOI | PubMed]
96. J. Liu, Y. Qiang, O. Alvarez, E. Du. Electrical impedance characterization of erythrocyte response to cyclic hypoxia in sickle cell disease. ACS Sens., 2019. [DOI | PubMed]
97. G. Jenkins, Y. Wang, Y.L. Xie, Q. Wu, W. Huang, L. Wang, X. Yang. Printed electronics integrated with paper-based microfluidics: New methodologies for next-generation health care. Microfluid. Nanofluid., 2015. [DOI]
98. M.M. Hamedi, A. Ainla, F. Güder, D.C. Christodouleas, M.T. Fernández-Abedul, G.M. Whitesides. Integrating electronics and microfluidics on paper. Adv. Mater., 2016. [DOI | PubMed]
99. S.R. Dabbagh, F. Rabbi, Z. Doğan, A.K. Yetisen, S. Tasoglu. Machine learning-enabled multiplexed microfluidic sensors. Biomicrofluidics, 2020. [DOI | PubMed]
100. Social Revolution in Menstrual Hygiene for Women