Increased dendritic inhibition of dentate gyrus granule cells in a mouse model of Down syndrome
1Translational Epilepsy Research, Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany
2Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
3Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
4BrainLinks-BrainTools, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
5Department of Medicine I, Lighthouse Core Facility, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
6Roche Pharma Research and Early Development, Neuroscience and Rare Diseases Discovery, Roche Innovation Center Basel, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland
Abstract
Down syndrome is the most common genetic neurodevelopmental disorder associated with mild-to-moderate intellectual disability. A disturbed excitation-inhibition balance is thought to be a major cause for the intellectual deficits in DS. In this study, we used patch-clamp electrophysiology, optogenetic stimulation and immunohistochemistry to investigate synaptic inhibition from specific interneuron subpopulations onto granule cells of the dentate gyrus in Ts65Dn mice. Optogenetically evoked inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) from somatostatin (SOM) interneurons onto dendrites of granule cells in the outer molecular layer (ML) did not differ between euploid (Eu) and Ts65Dn mice, indicating normal distal dendritic inhibition in Ts65Dn mice. In addition, optogenetically evoked IPSCs from parvalbumin (PV) interneurons were significantly reduced, indicating reduced functional somatic inhibition in Ts65Dn mice. In contrast, activation of cholecystokinin (CCK) positive interneurons by targeted electrical microstimulation of the inner molecular layer (iML) resulted in IPSCs of increased amplitude (Eu: 372.5 ± 51.97 pA, n = 10; Ts65Dn: 619.9 ± 74.68 pA, n = 9). GABAergic synaptic terminals of CCK interneurons express cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1). Quantitative analysis of synapses double-labeled for CB1 and the vesicular GABA transporter (VGAT) revealed a significantly increased number of putative CCK interneuron terminals in the iML of Ts65Dn mice (Eu: 0.048 ± 0.014 puncta/μm3, Ts65Dn: 0.34 ± 0.12 puncta/μm3). In contrast, the density of PV-VGAT double-positive synapses within the granule cell layer did not differ between the two genotypes. Taken together, our results indicate that proximal dendritic inhibition from CCK interneurons is increased in the dentate gyrus of Ts65Dn mice, while PV interneuron-mediated somatic inhibition appears to be unchanged or functionally diminished.
Untitled section
Keywords: dendrite, GABA, hippocampus, inhibition, interneuron, optogenetics, patch-clamp electrophysiology, trisomy 21
Article notes
Untitled section
Received 2025 Sep 27; Revised 2025 Nov 30; Accepted 2026 Jan 5; Collection date 2026.
Introduction
Down syndrome (DS) is the most common genetic disorder of intellectual disability (Desai, 1997; Antonarakis et al., 2020). In addition to the neurological system, DS affects the cardiovascular and musculoskeletal systems including common phenotypes of short stature, muscle hypotonia and congenital heart defects. Importantly, patients have a significantly higher risk of suffering from epilepsy and early-onset Alzheimer (Antonarakis et al., 2020). The underlying genetic mechanism is a triplication of the human chromosome 21 causing a perturbation in gene regulation and expression (Dierssen, 2012; Antonarakis et al., 2020). There are currently no approved pharmacological treatments to address cognitive deficits in DS patients. The most widely used model to investigate the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying impairments in DS is the Ts65Dn mouse in which a segmental trisomy for the distal murine chromosome 16 was produced by reciprocal translocation. This segment hosts genes, which are evolutionarily conserved from human chromosome 21, including the DS critical region (Reeves et al., 1995). Ts65Dn mice recapitulate most DS phenotypes. In particular, they show the typical neurological disturbances like deficits in short- and long-term memory, reduced neurogenesis and impaired performance on complex visual spatial learning tasks (Chakrabarti et al., 2007; Dierssen, 2012).
An imbalance of excitation and inhibition in the trisomic brain is thought to be the main cause for the deficits in declarative learning and memory (Kleschevnikov et al., 2004; Chakrabarti et al., 2010; Rueda et al., 2020). Long-term potentiation (LTP), thought to be the synaptic mechanisms underlying memory, is impaired in Ts65Dn mice (Malenka and Nicoll, 1999; Kleschevnikov et al., 2004). Calcium influx through NMDA receptors is necessary for most forms of LTP in the hippocampus (Malenka and Nicoll, 1999), and NMDA receptor activation has recently been shown to be impaired due to increased dendritic inhibition in the CA1 area (Schulz et al., 2019). Importantly, application of non-competitive GABAA receptor blockers (Pentylenetetrazol or Picrotoxin) in non-epileptic concentrations rescued the behavior in novel object recognition tasks and the induction of LTP (Kleschevnikov et al., 2004; Fernandez et al., 2007). Together, these results suggested that aberrantly increased GABAA receptor mediated inhibition leads to abnormalities in hippocampus-dependent learning and memory in DS.
The dentate gyrus (DG) of the hippocampus is essential for memory processing as it contributes to pattern separation (Leutgeb et al., 2007; McHugh et al., 2007; Myers and Scharfman, 2011; Madar et al., 2019). Different interneuron subpopulations control its activity and output along the trisynaptic path (Hu et al., 2014; Elgueta and Bartos, 2019). In the DG of Ts65Dn mice, Kleschevnikov and colleagues found an increased frequency of miniature IPSCs (mIPSCs) and strongly increased electrically evoked GABAA- and GABAB-mediated IPSCs (Kleschevnikov et al., 2012). Which specific interneurons mediated this increase in inhibition could not be determined using the available approaches. More recent studies using cell type or layer specific activation of GABAergic inputs have shown that enhanced dendritic inhibition likely mediated by somatostatin (SOM) expressing interneurons contributes to altered inhibition in the CA1 area and the prefrontal cortex (PFC) (Schulz et al., 2019; de Zorilla San Martin et al., 2020). Therefore, we used optogenetic and targeted electrical stimulation of specific inputs from GABAergic interneurons in combination with immunohistochemistry to investigate synaptic inhibition from specific interneuron subpopulations onto granule cells of the DG in Ts65Dn mice in the present study. The particular focus was on SOM-, cholecystokinin (CCK)-positive, and parvalbumin (PV-) interneurons mediating distal dendritic, proximal dendritic and perisomatic inhibition.
Materials and methods
Animals
Electrical stimulation experiments were performed on Ts65Dn (B6EiC3Sn a/A-Ts (1716) 65Dn/J) mice obtained from The Jackson Laboratory. Ts65Dn females were backcrossed with B6C3F1/OlaHsd males (F1 hybrid males from C57BL/6JOlaHsd ♀ × C3H/HeNHsd ♂ obtained from Harlan). For optogenetic experiments, we used triple crosses of B6EiC3Sn a/A-Ts(1716)65Dn/J ♀ × F1 ♂ (B6.129P2-Pvalbtm1 (cre) Arbr/J × Ai32 (RCL-ChR2(H134R)/EYFP)) and B6EiC3Sn a/A-Ts(1716)65Dn/J ♀ × F1 ♂ (SST tm2.1(cre) Zjh/J × Ai32 (RCL-ChR2 (H134R)/EYFP)), referred to as Eu or Ts65Dn, in the remainder of the text. We identified the supernumerary chromosome in 1716 of Ts65Dn mice in the offspring by standard polymerase chain reaction (PCR) procedures (Reinholdt et al., 2011). Eu and Ts65Dn mice were littermates. In this study experiments were performed with 6-week-old and fully mature (8-week-old) mice of both sexes. Mice were housed in groups of up to 5 animals in standard ventilated cages with a 12 h light/dark cycle and had ad libitum access to food and water. All experiments were approved by the Basel Cantonal Committee on Animal Experimentation according to federal and cantonal regulations.
Perfusion and slice preparation for immunohistochemistry
Five Eu (3 male, 2 female) and four Ts65Dn (2 male, 2 female) fully mature mice were transcardially perfused under deep anesthesia with 0.9% saline followed by paraformaldehyde (PFA, 4% in 0.1 M phosphate buffered saline (PB), pH 7.4). The brains were post-fixed overnight in PFA at 4 °C. Afterwards they were cryoprotected in 30% sucrose and frozen in isopentane. Frontal sections with a thickness of 50 μm were cut on a cryostat and stored at 4 °C in 0.1 M PB for immunohistochemistry.
Slice preparation for patch clamp recordings
Mice (41 male, 22 female) were placed for approximately 10 min in an oxygen-enriched environment to increase cell survival. We anesthetized the animals with isoflurane (4% in O2, Vapor, Draeger). Decapitation was performed in accordance with the national and institutional guidelines as soon as the righting reflex was absent. Slices were cut as previously described (Geiger et al., 2002; Bischofberger et al., 2006): The brain was carefully removed in ice-cold sucrose-based solution that contained (in mM): 87 NaCl, 25 NaHCO3, 2.5 KCl, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 75 sucrose, 0.5 CaCl2, 7 MgCl2 and 10 glucose (equilibrated with 95% O2/5% CO2; Osmolarity: 325–328 mOsm). Parahorizontal slices of 350 μm thickness were cut with a VT1200 vibratome (Leica Microsystems) and collected in the same sucrose-based solution. Finally, they were incubated at 35 °C for 30 min and stored at room temperature until the experiments were performed.
Patch clamp recordings
We visually identified granule cells (GCs) by using infrared differential interference contrast video microscopy. The slices were continuously superfused with ACSF at room temperature, containing the following (in mM): 125 NaCl, 25 glucose, 25 NaHCO3, 2.5 KCl, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 2 CaCl2 and 1 MgCl2 (equilibrated with 95% O2/5% CO2; Osmolarity: 318–320 mOsm). Patch pipettes were pulled from borosilicate glass tubing (outer diameter: 2.0 mm; wall thickness: 0.5 mm; Hilgenberg) on a Flaming-Brown P-97 puller (Sutter Instruments).
GCs were voltage-clamped at −80 mV in the whole-cell configuration. The current signal was measured using a Multiclamp 700A amplifier (Molecular Devices), low-pass filtered with a cutoff frequency of 8 kHz and digitized at 20 kHz via a CED Power 1401 Interface (Cambridge Electronic Design). Patch pipettes had a resistance in a range of 2-4 MΩ. The internal solution depended on the type of experiment. In general, we used potassium-chloride-based (KCl) internal solutions for the recording of proximal synaptic inputs and cesium-chloride-based (CsCl) internal solutions for the recording of distal synaptic inputs from SOM interneurons. Specifically, we used the following KCl-based solution with addition of a potassium-gluconate for greater stability in the initial experiments employing electrical stimulation of GABAergic inputs in the iML of 6-week-old mice (in mM): 52 KGluc, 100 KCl, 10 HEPES, 0.1 EGTA, 2 MgCl2, 2 Na2ATP, 1 Phosphocreatine, 0.3 GTP, 5 QX314 (bromide or chloride) and 0.1% biocytin, adjusted to pH 7.28 with KOH. Subsequently, we employed KCl-based solutions for electrical stimulation (in mM): 120 KCl, 10 HEPES, 2 MgCl2, 20 BAPTA, 2 Na2ATP, 0.3 GTP, 5 QX314 (bromide or chloride); and optogenetic stimulation of PV interneurons (in mM): 140 KCl, 10 EGTA, 10 HEPES, 2 MgCl2, 2 Na2ATP, 0.3 GTP, 5 QX314 (bromide or chloride) and 0.1% biocytin. The pH was adjusted to 7.3 with KOH and the osmolarity was approximately 315 mOsm/L. For recording of distal dendritic inputs evoked by optogenetic stimulation of SOM-interneurons, pipettes were filled with a CsCl-based solution with addition of cesium-gluconate (CsGluc) containing the following in (mM): 40 CsGluc, 100 CsCl, 10 EGTA, 10 HEPES, 2 MgCl2, 2 Na2ATP, 2 TEA-Cl, 0.3 GTP and 5 QX314 (bromide or chloride) and 0.1% biocytin, adjusted to pH 7.3 with CsOH.
Criteria to include recordings in the analysis were the following: initial seal resistances were at least 1 GΩ; series resistance (Rs) changed less than 30% during the recording and did not exceed 20 MΩ. An online analysis was performed to monitor the Rs and input resistance (Rin) during the experiments, by applying a − 5 mV voltage step at the end of each sweep. Furthermore, we excluded experiments, if IPSCs were recorded more than 7 h after slice preparation. All experiments were performed at room temperature (20–22 °C). Data was collected using IGOR Pro 6.31 (WaveMetrics) and the CSF library support from Cambridge Electronic Design.
Extracellular synaptic stimulation
To stimulate synaptic inputs, pipettes with a resistance of 3–6 MΩ were filled with a HEPES-buffered Na2+-rich solution. The stimulating pipette was placed in the inner molecular layer (iML), close to the granule cell layer (GCL). Recordings in the electrical stimulation experiments were performed in presence of 3 mM Kynurenic acid (Kyn) to block glutamatergic receptors at glutamatergic synapses, which are also recruited by electrical stimulation to ensure that the recorded IPSCs were GABAergic. Two electrical stimuli of 0.2 ms length were applied at low intensities (10–30 μA) with an inter-stimulus-interval (ISI) of 200 ms.
Channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2) mediated activation of GABAergic interneurons
A diode laser (DL-473, Rapp OptoElectronic GmbH) was used in this study. The laser was coupled to the epifluorescence port of the respective microscope (Zeiss Examiner, equipped with a 63x NA = 1.0 water immersion objective; Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH) via fiber optics and were controlled via TTL pulses. Whole field stimulation was performed using light with a wavelength of 473 nm. Two pulses were applied (1 ms duration each). Due to different decay time constants of the evoked IPSCs, the ISI was adjusted to trigger a second response after the first had almost returned back to baseline (stimulation of PV interneurons: ISI = 200 ms; stimulation of SOM interneurons: ISI = 500 ms). The field of illumination was targeted either to the GCL, when stimulating PV interneurons, or the border region of the ML to the stratum lacunosum moleculare to stimulate dendritic inputs mediated by SOM interneurons. Recordings of SOM inputs were done in presence of 3 mM Kyn to block glutamatergic receptors, because some Cre-driver lines may have unspecific expression in excitatory neurons (Müller-Komorowska et al., 2020).
Drugs and reagents
Picrotoxin (PTX, Sigma Aldrich) was dissolved at 50 mM in ethanol, Kyn (Tocris) at 300 mM in 0.6 N NaOH and gabazine (Tocris) at 10 mM in Millipore water. Drug aliquots were stored in the freezer at −20 °C. The dilutions of these drugs in ASCF were prepared at the day of the experiment at the following concentrations: 100 μM PTX, 3 mM Kyn and 10 μM gabazine.
Immunohistochemistry
Acute slices (350 μm thick) with biocytin-filled cells were fixed overnight in 4% PFA and underwent the following protocol. First, they were washed in 0.1 M PB three times (15 min each). Blocking was done for 1 h at room temperature with the following solution (per slice): 475 μL 0.3% Triton X-100, 25 μL normal donkey serum (NDS). Next, the slices were transferred in the solution of the primary antibodies for 72 h at 4 °C (per slice): 475 μL 0.3% Triton X-100, 25 μL NDS, chicken anti-green-fluorescent-protein (GFP, 1:1000, #ab13970, Abcam). After another four washing steps (15 min each) in 0.1 M PB slices were put in the secondary antibody solution (per slice): 475 μL 0.3% Triton X-100, 25 μL NDS, donkey anti-chicken Alexa 488 (1:500, #703–545-155, Jackson ImmunoResearch), Streptavidin Alexa Fluor 568 (1:1000, #s11226, MoBiTech) and DAPI (1:10000, Sigma Aldrich). We incubated slices overnight at 4 °C. The slices were washed in another three steps (10 min-2*15 min) in 0.1 M PB. Slices were placed on microscope slides, liquid was removed with filter paper and they were mounted directly with ProLong Gold Antifade (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
Another protocol was used for immunohistochemistry of 50 μm fixed cryostat slices. After washing in 0.1 M PB, slices were preincubated with 0.25% Triton X-100 and 10% normal horse serum (NHS) in 0.1 M PB for 30 min at room temperature. Followed by incubation with primary antibodies 3 h at room temperature and 4 °C overnight: guinea pig anti-vesicular GABA transporter (VGAT, 1:500, #131004, Synaptic Systems), rabbit anti-PV (1:1000, #PV-27, Swant) and rabbit anti-cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1, 1:500, #258003, Synaptic Systems). Slices were transferred into the secondary antibodies with the following dilutions: donkey anti-rabbit Alexa 488 (1:500, #A21206, Thermo Fisher Scientific), donkey anti-guinea pig Cy5 (1:200, #706175148, Jackson ImmunoResearch), and counterstained with DAPI (1:10000, Roche Diagnostics). After incubating 3 h at room temperature, slices were washed in 0.1 M PB, mounted and coverslipped with DAKO fluorescence mounting medium.
Imaging and 3D-reconstruction
Images of 350 μm thick slices were taken with a Zeiss LSM 700 confocal microscope. Zeiss ZEN software was used for the processing.
Cryostat slices (50 μm thick) were imaged with a Zeiss LSM 880 confocal microscope with AiryScan using a 40x water immersion (1.2 NA, additional 2x zoom factor) or a 63x oil immersion objective (1.4 NA, additional 2x zoom factor). Images were taken with a z-stack step size of 0.14 μm and had approximately a total thickness of 7 μm. We measured chromatic aberration with microscopic beads and could not find a distortion.
We imaged three slices per animal and four regions within each slice. In total 12 images per animal were analyzed. 3D-reconstruction was done in Imaris (Version 9.9.2 Bitplane). First, a baseline subtraction was performed on the VGAT channel. Next, puncta were automatically reconstructed with the spot analysis tool of Imaris. A mask of VGAT+ puncta was created in either the CB1 or PV channel, to mark all double positive synapses. A second automatic detection of VGAT+ and CB1+ or PV+ puncta was again performed with the spot analysis tool. Density of VGAT+ and double positive VGAT+ and CB1+ or PV+ puncta was calculated by dividing the total number of puncta by the volume of the whole z-stack.
Data analysis
The analysis of patch clamp data was performed with the software Stimfit (https://neurodroid. Github.io/stimfit) (Guzman et al., 2014) and scripts written in Python. On mean traces, the amplitude of the two responses to stimulation was identified by measuring the peak over 5 sample points and subtracting the baseline formed by the mean over 1,280 sample points or 64 ms, respectively.
Input resistance and Rs were determined directly after break-in and through-out the experiment, respectively, by applying a − 5 mV step pulse. The baseline for those measurements was calculated as the mean over 1,800 sample points or 90 ms before the start of the −5 mV voltage step. To evaluate Rin, the mean was calculated over a defined 50 ms time window, starting 100 ms after the onset of the voltage pulse. The difference between the calculated mean value and the described baseline was computed and used to calculate Rin. To evaluate the Rs, the onset peak amplitude was determined and subtracted from the baseline. Another evaluated cellular property was the decay time constant τ(break-in). It was measured for the onset peak amplitude, in response to a − 5 mV voltage step directly after break-in. The time constant τ(break-in) was estimated by the weighted average of time constants from a biexponential fit starting at 95% of the amplitude and ending approximately 20 ms after the onset of the voltage step. The estimate of the cell capacitance (Cp) was calculated with τ(break-in) and Rs directly after break-in.
We analyzed the risetime and decay time constant τ for IPSCs in response to a double pulse stimulation. The risetime was calculated from 20 to 80% of the peak amplitude for the first IPSC. A biexponential fit as for τ(break-in) was used to determine the time constant τ of the second IPSC starting at 95% of the amplitude and ending 250 ms after the stimulation. τ represents the weighted average of the fit.
Inclusion criteria for electrophysiological recordings
Neurogenesis in the DG continues well into adulthood, but declines with age (Ben Abdallah et al., 2010). New-born and immature GCs show striking differences of cellular and synaptic electrophysiological properties including the cellular input resistance compared to mature GCs (see, e.g., Heigele et al., 2016). We used the following strategy to obtain a homogenous sample of GCs to enable robust statistical evaluation of genotype-specific effects on evoked GABAergic inputs: 1. GCs were recorded from the outer GCL adjacent to the ML where primarily mature GCs reside. 2. Based on recordings of outer GCs obtained from 8-week-old mice kept in standard housing, we used the 95-percentile of the cumulative contribution of Rin of 550 MΩ as the cut-off threshold for the inclusion of GCs in our analysis (Supplementary Figure S1). Rin measurements were neither affected by the intracellular solution nor by the genotype, allowing us a pooling of Rin from all experiments (Supplementary Figure S1). In this GC population with Rin ≤ 550 MΩ, GCs can be considered to be relatively mature. Table 1 shows the cell parameters Rin, τ(break-in) and Cp for all cells recorded in 6- and 8-week-old mice. There were no significant differences between Eu and Ts65Dn mice at a comparable level of cellular maturity (p ≥ 0.11, unpaired t-tests two-tailed).
| Eu | Ts65Dn | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rin ≤ 550 MΩ (n = 102) | Rin > 550 MΩ (n = 26) | Rin ≤ 550 MΩ (n = 89) | Rin > 550 MΩ (n = 23) | |
| Rin [MΩ] | 341.5 ± 0.01 | 818.6 ± 51.3 | 322.3 ± 12.7 | 874.9 ± 73.1 |
| τ(break-in) [ms] | 1.51 ± 0.03 | 1.51 ± 0.06 | 1.50 ± 0.04 | 1.60 ± 0.09 |
| Cp [pF] | 119.7 ± 2.55 | 119.2 ± 3.84 | 126.3 ± 3.14 | 122.2 ± 5.71 |
Experimental design and statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed in Prism 9 (GraphPad). Unpaired two-tailed t-tests were used to detect significant effects between two groups. We used a mixed-effect analysis to test for differences in the input–output relation with repeated measures and two-way ANOVA for non-repeated measures (e.g., comparison between the two groups of ages) or for comparison between stimulations of different interneurons. As there were no genotype-specific differences in synaptic properties, data was pooled for comparison between targeted interneurons. For data pooled across genotypes, one-way ANOVA was used. Multiple comparisons were performed using a Šídák-Test, which minimizes the occurrence of type one errors by a weighting of the p-value. The significance level was set to p = 0.05 for all tests. All data is shown as mean ± SEM. The number (n) of observations reflects for electrophysiological experiments the number of cells recorded from and for immunohistochemical experiments the number of animals. For electrophysiological recordings, blinding of the experimenter to the genotype was not possible, because Ts65Dn mice have phenotypic characteristics, for example a smoother scalp, smaller brain and body sizes. Although a formal randomization of experiments was not performed, Eu control mice were littermates of Ts65Dn mice and were always used in an interleaved fashion. For the 3D-reconstruction, the analysis images were randomized and the experimenter was fully blinded.
Results
Increased proximal dendritic inhibition evoked by iML stimulation in Ts65Dn mice
Previous studies demonstrated enhanced GABAergic synaptic transmission in the hippocampus of Ts65Dn mice (Kleschevnikov et al., 2012; Schulz et al., 2019). Kleschevnikov and colleagues showed increased inhibitory synaptic signaling in the DG of Ts65Dn mice when they stimulated electrically in the molecular layer (ML) while recording from GCs. The identity of the interneurons mediating the increased inhibition in Ts65Dn mice has not been determined. In order to stimulate specifically local inhibitory inputs onto the proximal dendrites of GCs, we used electrical stimulation at low intensity in the inner ML (iML) in two cohorts of mice of different ages (Figure 1; Supplementary Figure S2). These experiments as well as subsequent experiments employing optogenetic stimulation were performed under the assumption that there were no major changes in axonal excitability of targeted interneurons in the DG of Ts65Dn mice.
Inhibitory postsynaptic currents were evoked at increasing current intensities ranging from 10 μA to 30 μA. Amplitudes of evoked IPSCs increased with higher stimulation intensities in Eu and Ts65Dn mice (p < 0.0001, F(2, 34) = 57.01, mixed-effect analysis, nEu = 10, nTs65Dn = 9) (Figure 1C). There was a significant effect of the genotype indicating larger IPSCs in Ts65Dn mice (p = 0.0176, F(1, 17) = 6.917, mixed-effect analysis). To test for differences in fully mature mice, experiments were repeated in a cohort of 8-week-old mice. The results were qualitatively very similar (Supplementary Figure S2), with a strong trend toward an effect of the genotype by stimulation intensity interaction (p = 0.08, F(1, 18) = 3.39, mixed-effect analysis; Supplementary Figure S2). Combining the IPSCs evoked at 30 μA from both datasets supported a significant effect of the genotype (p = 0.002, F(1, 36) = 11.46, two-way ANOVA, nEu = 19, nTs65Dn = 21; Figure 1D). Experiments were performed in the presence of Kyn to block glutamatergic neurotransmission. Wash-in of the GABAA receptor blocker gabazine after the experiment caused a full suppression of the electrically evoked IPSCs, confirming that the recorded currents were GABAergic (Figures 1E–G). Together, these results support the hypothesis of an increased inhibition in the DG of Ts65Dn mice and point to proximal dendritic inhibitory inputs as an important source.
Age-dependent reduction of optogenetically activated SOM and PV interneuron inhibition in the dentate gyrus of Ts65Dn mice
A previous study in the PFC indicated that SOM interneuron-mediated inhibition to more distal compartments could also cause enhanced GABAergic transmission in Ts65Dn mice (de Zorilla San Martin et al., 2020). To directly test whether SOM interneuron-mediated dendritic inhibition is altered in the DG of Ts65Dn mice, we optogenetically stimulated these interneurons expressing ChR2. The field of illumination was directed to the outer ML for dendritic inhibition to selectively stimulate synaptic inputs of SOM interneurons innervating the distal dendrites of GCs (Figures 2A–D). Dendritic IPSCs of GCs were measured in the presence of Kyn.
Figures 2E,F represent the input–output relation of dendritic IPSCs from SOM interneurons in response to increasing laser intensity in 6-week-old mice. There was a significant main effect of the laser light intensity on the amplitude (p < 0.0001, F(3, 63) = 72.30, mixed-effect analysis, nEu = 11, nTs65Dn = 12). In addition, there was significant light intensity by genotype interaction (p = 0.0012, F(3, 48) = 6.175, mixed-effect analysis, nEu = 8, nTs65Dn = 10; Figure 2F). However, IPSC amplitudes recorded in 8-week-old were not different between Eu and Ts65Dn mice (laser intensity genotype interaction, p = 0.6, F(3, 63) = 0.61, mixed-effect analysis, nEu = 11, nTs65Dn = 12; Figure 2G; Supplementary Figure S3). Thus, while the IPSC amplitude from SOM inputs were reduced in 6-week-old animals, this phenomenon was no longer present in 8-week-old mice. This result may be explained by a delayed maturation of SOM inputs to distal dendrites of GCs in Ts65Dn mice. However, these results do not support the hypothesis that SOM interneuron inputs to the distal dendritic tree of GCs contribute to increased GABAergic transmission in the DG of Ts65Dn mice.
The perisomatic compartment receives prominent inhibition that is primarily mediated by PV interneurons (Kraushaar and Jonas, 2000; Hu et al., 2014). PV interneuron-mediated synaptic inputs onto GCs have not been directly investigated in the DG of Ts65Dn mice previously. In mice expressing ChR2 in PV interneurons, we targeted the field of illumination to the GCL with the recorded GC in the center (Figures 3A–D). The addition of 100 μM PTX fully blocked the evoked IPSCs confirming that they were GABAergic (Figures 3H–J).
Inputs were evoked with increasing stimulation intensity in slices from 8-week-old Eu and Ts65Dn littermates (Figures 3E,F). There was a significant effect of the laser light intensity on IPSC amplitude (p < 0.0001, F(3, 51) = 33.50, mixed-effect analysis, nEu = 8, nTs65Dn = 11), which, however, appeared rather weak in Ts65Dn mice. Interestingly, IPSCs evoked by an optogenetic stimulation of PV interneurons were reduced in Ts65Dn mice (Figure 3F). Thus, there was a significant interaction between laser intensity and genotype (p = 0.0097, F(3, 51) = 4.22, mixed-effect analysis, nEu = 8, nTs65Dn = 11). Similar results were obtained in a second independent set of data recorded in 6-week-old animals (Figure 3G; Supplementary Figure S4). Combining both datasets confirmed a significant effect of the genotype (p = 0.03, F(1, 48) = 4.7, two-way ANOVA, nEu-6w = 11, nEu-8w = 17, nTs65Dn-6w = 13, nTs65Dn-6w = 11). Hence, these results indicate that PV interneurons do not contribute to increased GABAergic transmission in the DG of Ts65Dn mice and that PV interneuron-mediated perisomatic inhibition may be reduced instead.
Properties of proximal dendritic GABAergic inputs are clearly distinct from SOM and PV interneuron-mediated inhibition
The results so far suggest that electrically evoked proximal dendritic inputs are enhanced in Ts65Dn mice, while optogenetically evoked inputs from SOM and PV interneurons were either unchanged or reduced. To investigate whether electrically evoked proximal dendritic inputs were indeed distinct from inputs from SOM and PV interneurons, we investigated the kinetics of the inputs and their short-term plasticity. These properties are characteristic for specific sets of synapses and depend on the presynaptic neuron of a synapse, postsynaptic receptor composition and location within the dendritic tree (Savanthrapadian et al., 2014; Schulz et al., 2018).
We used two-way ANOVAs to assess genotype-specific differences in synaptic properties. For none of the properties, we observed significant genotype specific effects (Figure 4; Supplementary Table S1). Therefore, we pooled data across genotypes for further comparisons of synaptic properties between different targeted presynaptic interneurons. First, we evaluated the rise time of the optically and electrically evoked IPSCs from 20 to 80% of the peak amplitude to baseline (Figures 4A–D). IPSCs elicited by the three different targeted stimulations showed significantly different rise times (p < 0.0001, F(2, 57) = 2.64, one-way ANOVA) (Figure 4D). Electrical stimulation in the iML evoked IPSCs with significantly slower rise time (Eu = 4.92 ± 0.17 ms, n = 8; Ts65Dn = 4.50 ± 0.41 ms, n = 11) than by PV interneurons (Eu = 1.88 ± 0.17 ms, n = 8; Ts65Dn = 2.21 ± 0.34 ms, n = 10; p < 0.0001, Sidak’s multiple-comparisons test). They also tended to be slower than IPSCs mediated by SOM interneurons (Eu = 3.95 ± 0.23 ms, n = 11; Ts65Dn = 4.04 ± 0.07 ms, n = 12; p = 0.03, Sidak’s multiple-comparisons test).
Next, we checked the decay time constant τ, which was measured from 95% of the peak amplitude to the baseline. Again, one-way ANOVA demonstrated a significant difference between IPSCs from the three different stimulations (p < 0.0001, F(2, 59) = 1.66) (Figures 4A–C,E). IPSCs of the iML stimulation showed the slowest τ (Eu = 79.86 ± 4.98 ms, n = 8; Ts65Dn = 74.86 ± 3.81 ms, n = 13). IPSCs generated by stimulating PV interneurons showed the fastest decay (Eu = 35.49 ± 1.51 ms, n = 8; Ts65Dn = 41.23 ± 4.42 ms, n = 10). SOM interneurons evoked IPSCs were indicative of a slower time constant τ (Eu = 55.82 ± 2.66 ms, n = 11; Ts65Dn = 62.62 ± 2.65 ms, n = 12) than PV interneuron- and faster than iML stimulation-evoked ones (PV vs. SOM: p < 0.0001; SOM vs. iML: p < 0.0001, Sidak’s multiple-comparisons test). Based on the kinetics, we suggest that the type of interneuron contributing to the observed over-inhibition has rather slow output synapses.
The paired-pulse ratio (PPR) was used to examine synaptic short-term plasticity. There were significantly different PPR values for the three stimulations (p < 0.0001, F(2, 59) = 0.27, one-way ANOVA) (Figures 4A–C,F). The highest PPR was calculated for the iML stimulation (Eu = 0.84 ± 0.03, n = 8; Ts65Dn = 0.81 ± 0.03, n = 13). A similar ratio was calculated for SOM interneuron-mediated inputs (Eu = 0.75 ± 0.02, n = 11; Ts65Dn = 0.75 ± 0.03, n = 12; p = 0.18, Sidak’s multiple-comparisons test). A paired-pulse depression, with the lowest PPR, was identified for synapses of PV interneurons (Eu = 0.58 ± 0.04, n = 8; Ts65Dn = 0.56 ± 0.05, n = 10) (Figures 4A,D) (SOM vs. PV: p < 0.0001, Sidak’s multiple-comparisons test).
Together, the results from the kinetics and PPR analyses suggested that neither PV nor SOM interneurons contributed significantly to the GABAergic inputs evoked by our electrical stimulation in the iML. We did not notice any genotype-specific effects for the short-term plasticity of the different stimulations. Hence, our results suggest that the presynaptic properties of GABAergic synapses are not the major cause of an altered efficiency of GABAergic transmission in the DG of 8-week-old Ts65Dn mice. Electrical properties with slower rise time and weaker PPD than PV inputs have been reported for CCK interneurons (Hefft and Jonas, 2005). Based on the position of our electrical stimulation as well as the observed pronounced difference of kinetics and PPRs, we hypothesized that inhibition mediated by CCK interneurons may be increased in Ts65Dn mice.
For a more direct assessment of the involvement of CCK interneurons, we tested the effect of CB1 receptor activation on the IPSCs evoked in the iML. CB1 receptors are known to be strongly and selectively expressed on the presynaptic terminals of CCK interneurons where they contribute to regulation of presynaptic release properties (Katona et al., 1999). However, bath application of 1 µM ACEA did not induce a clear reduction of IPSCs evoked by electrical stimulation in iML, although there was a non-significant trend to a reduction in recordings from Eu mice (Supplementary Figure S5). While these results could not support our hypothesis that increased inhibition in the DG was mediated by CCK interneurons, it may be possible that they reflect differences in the ventral versus the dorsal hippocampus (see Discussion). We proceeded to evaluate the source of increased synaptic inhibition in the iML of Ts65Dn mice by immunohistochemical methods.
Increased number of CB1+ and constant PV+ terminals in the DG of Ts65Dn mice
An increased number of inhibitory synapses in the iML of Ts65Dn mice has been reported by Martínez-Cué et al. (2013). CCK interneurons densely innervate the iML and highly express the endocannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1) in their axons (McDonald, 2021; Morozov and Freund, 2003). To clarify if CCK interneurons might contribute to enhanced inhibitory synapse density in the iML, we used double-labeling of CB1 with the inhibitory synaptic marker VGAT (Figures 5A–D). This allowed a specific reconstruction of CCK+ synapses in the DG (Figures 5A1–D1). CB1 expression was restricted to the iML and outer GCL for both genotypes. 3D-reconstruction revealed that the number of VGAT+ inhibitory synapses (Eu = 0.14 ± 0.03 puncta/μm3, n = 4; Ts65Dn = 0.62 ± 0.20, n = 3, p = 0.04, F(2, 3) = 27.09, unpaired t-test two-tailed) (Figure 5E) and CCK interneuron synapses (CB1+ and VGAT+) were strongly increased in Ts65Dn mice (Eu = 0.048 ± 0.014 puncta/μm3, n = 4; Ts65Dn = 0.34 ± 0.12, n = 3, p = 0.03, F(2, 3) = 58.24, unpaired t-test two-tailed) (Figure 5F). Furthermore, the relative proportion of CB1+ puncta of VGAT-labeled presynaptic terminals was significantly increased in Ts65Dn mice (Eu = 27.31 ± 2.22%, n = 4; Ts65Dn = 51.17 ± 3.99%, n = 3, p = 0.003, F(2, 3) = 2.43, unpaired t-test two-tailed) (Figure 5G). These results suggest that the increased inhibition in the iML of Ts65Dn mice may be caused by an increased number of CCK+ synapses.
In a second step we investigated the terminals of PV interneurons with double labeling for PV and VGAT (Figures 5H–K). The PV signal was concentrated in the GCL and we observed the characteristic basket-like patterns of PV terminals targeting the soma of GCs (Figures 5I,K). Reconstruction of VGAT+ synapses (Eu = 0.10 ± 0.03, n = 5; Ts65Dn = 0.18 ± 0.06, n = 4, p = 0.27, F(3, 4) = 3.09, unpaired t-test two-tailed) (Figures 5H1,J1,L) and specifically PV+ inhibitory synapses (PV+ and VGAT+) revealed that their densities were not altered in the GCL of Ts65Dn mice (Eu = 0.048 ± 0.016, n = 5; Ts65Dn = 0.084 ± 0.030, n = 4, p = 0.29, F(3, 4) = 2.93, unpaired t-test two-tailed) (Figures 5I1,K1,M). The relative number of PV synapses was consistent between the two genotypes (Eu = 47.21 ± 2.09%, n = 5; Ts65Dn = 46.18 ± 1.84%, n = 4, p = 0.73, F(4, 3) = 1.61, unpaired t-test two-tailed) (Figure 5N). Together, these results support a specific increase of CCK+ synapses on GCs in Ts65Dn mice.
Discussion
This study provides new insights into how PV, SOM and CCK interneurons may contribute to increased GABAergic signaling in the DG of Ts65Dn mice. Cell-specific optogenetic stimulation showed that PV and SOM interneurons do not contribute to increased inhibition in the DG of Ts65Dn mice. In contrast, CCK interneurons which densely innervate the iML and form CB1+ synapses on the proximal dendrites of GCs may contribute to increased inhibition in Ts65Dn mice, as supported by a larger amplitude of IPSCs evoked by electrical stimulation in the iML and increased CB1+ positive presynaptic puncta in the iML.
To the best of our knowledge, no study to date has investigated the specific contribution of CCK interneurons to altered inhibition in Ts65Dn mice. Di Franco et al. (2022) were the first to observe a higher number of CB1 positive putative interneurons in the hilus of Ts65Dn mice. CCK interneurons are known to strongly innervate the iML of the DG (Hefft and Jonas, 2005). Within the iML, CB1 is highly expressed in the terminals of CCK interneurons and only to a small fraction in astrocytes (Freund et al., 2003; Navarrete and Araque, 2008). In agreement with previous studies (Martínez-Cué et al., 2013), we counted more VGAT-positive presynaptic GABAergic terminals in the iML of Ts65Dn mice. Furthermore, we could demonstrate that the density of inhibitory CB1+ synapses in the iML was increased by about 20% in Ts65Dn mice compared to Eu littermates. This indicates that there are more synapses from CCK interneurons onto the proximal dendrites of GCs. This conclusion is also supported by increased GABAergic synaptic inputs evoked in the iML, which showed no indication of altered synaptic release properties or kinetics. As direct optogenetic stimulation of other non-CCK interneurons did not show increased synaptic inputs, our results indicate that there is an increased density of GABAergic synapses specifically from CCK interneurons in the iML that significantly contributes to altered inhibition in the DG of Ts65Dn mice.
One important limitation of the current study is that we could not directly confirm that increased inhibition in the iML of Ts65Dn mice is mediated by CCK interneurons. A direct pharmacological test of the involvement of CB1 receptor-responsive presynaptic terminals from CCK interneurons remained inconclusive (Supplementary Figure S5). This may indicate that other interneuron subtypes than CCK interneurons strongly contribute to increased GABAergic inhibition in the iML of Ts65Dn mice. This would be in agreement with overall increased VGat puncta in the iML of Ts65Dn mice that was not restricted to CB1+ VGat puncta (Figure 5). In addition, recent research highlights that effects of endocannabinoid signaling significantly differ in the ventral compared to the dorsal hippocampus (Serra et al., 2024; Tsotsokou et al., 2025). Among other differences, the ventral hippocampus is subject to different dopamine signaling (Kempadoo et al., 2016; Nordin et al., 2025; Dubovyk and Manahan-Vaughan, 2019). Dopamine signaling has been shown to modulate endocannabinoid signaling such that CB1-mediated depression of inhibition is switched to enhancement by higher dopamine D2 signaling in the globus pallidus (Caballero-Florán et al., 2016). Therefore, it is conceivable that CB1-mediated action on presynaptic release may also have different consequences in the ventral compared to the dorsal hippocampus. This important question will have to be addressed in future experiments.
Earlier work suggested that an increased number of GABAergic interneurons in the cortex and hippocampus of Ts65Dn mice may contribute to altered inhibition in Ts65Dn mice (Chakrabarti et al., 2010; Pérez-Cremades et al., 2010; Hernández-González et al., 2015). More recent studies showed that specifically dendritic inhibition was increased in the CA1 and the PFC of Ts65Dn mice (Schulz et al., 2019; de Zorilla San Martin et al., 2020). In the PFC, the SOM+ Martinotti cells were identified as an important source to an increased inhibition in Ts65Dn mice (de Zorilla San Martin et al., 2020), whereas in CA1 the type of interneuron was not defined (Schulz et al., 2019). In the current study, we used optogenetic stimulation to investigate the contribution of SOM and PV interneurons to altered inhibition in the DG of Ts65Dn mice. However, optogenetically evoked inputs from SOM interneurons were decreased specifically at 6 weeks of age. This indicates a maturation dependent delay in distal dendritic inhibition which may be related to delayed dendritic maturation of GCs in the DG of Ts65Dn mice (Uguagliati et al., 2021). The observation of clearly decreased optogenetically evoked inhibition from PV interneurons is more puzzling. In contrast to decreased optogenetically evoked IPSCs from PV interneurons, the density of PV synapses in Ts65Dn did not differ from Eu littermates. As the PPRs remained unchanged, alterations of presynaptic release probability were unlikely to cause differences in the evoked IPSCs between genotypes. Altered axonal excitability of PV interneurons in the DG of Ts65Dn mice could be one factor that may explain lower recruitment of PV axon to light stimulation while total PV synapse numbers were not changed. The specific reasons for the discrepancy between our electrophysiological observation on PV interneuron inputs onto GCs and analyses of PV synapse density remain unclear at present. Irrespective of the underlying causes for partially decreased optogentically evoked inhibition from SOM and PV interneurons, these results clearly demonstrate that inhibition by these major interneuron subtypes does not contribute to increased inhibition in the DG of Ts65Dn mice.
The DG as part of the hippocampus plays an important role for memory formation and is responsible for pattern separation (Leutgeb et al., 2007; McHugh et al., 2007; Myers and Scharfman, 2011; Madar et al., 2019). Pattern separation is required to distinguish between similar experiences, which are encoded by incoming signals from the entorhinal cortex into the DG as multimodal patterns. The GCs are suggested to disperse these multimodal patterns by sparsely firing and thereby minimizing the similarity between experiences (Leutgeb et al., 2007; Madar et al., 2019). The different interneuron subpopulations within the DG tightly control its activity and contribute to the sparse firing of GCs (Hu et al., 2014; Elgueta and Bartos, 2019). Preclinical data indicates that memory deficits in DS are linked to an enhanced GABA signaling in the DG (Fernandez et al., 2007; Kleschevnikov et al., 2004; Kleschevnikov et al., 2012; Martínez-Cué et al., 2013) and may particularly affect spatial context-dependent learning (Hyde et al., 2001; Smith et al., 2014). In agreement with these observations in mouse models, particular difficulty in recalling spatial locations when contextual information was salient has been reported in people with DS (Clark et al., 2017). Recently, altered expression of endocannabinoids, and CB1 receptor, together with increased number of CB1-positive neurons in the hilus have been linked to the disease pathophysiology in Ts65Dn mice (Di Franco et al., 2022; Navarro-Romero et al., 2019). In addition, results from pharmacogenetic inhibition of ventral hippocampal CCK interneurons indicate that these neurons may act as regulators of spatial contextual reward learning (Nguyen et al., 2024). Based on our present results, we propose that enhanced GABAergic signaling mediated by CCK interneurons in the DG of Ts65Dn mice may lead to an altered activation of GCs and impaired long-term potentiation that encodes for spatial contextual information. Hence, the specificity of the output of the DG along the trisynaptic loop could be decreased and interfere with memory formation. This is expected to impair hippocampus functions like spatial coding and place preference learning in DS (Witton et al., 2015).
In light of these new results, correcting the altered GABAergic microcircuitry in the DG appears more challenging than previously thought. While direct modulation of the GABAergic system may be too unspecific, targeting the endocannabinoid system has been proposed previously (Navarro-Romero et al., 2019). CB1 receptor knockout in GABAergic neurons leads to cognitive deficits similar to those observed in Ts65Dn mice (Albayram et al., 2016) making CB1 receptor a potentially interesting target. Therefore, finding a targeted approach that may alleviate the most prominent GABAergic circuit deficits underlying learning impairments in DS remains a promising and important goal.
In conclusion, the present study highlights the important role of CCK interneurons on the inhibitory-excitatory imbalance in DS. We identified these interneurons as the main contributors to an increased GABAergic synapse density in the iML of the DG in a mouse model of DS that may be responsible for impaired learning and memory.
Acknowledgments
We thank Selma Becherer, Freya Pappert and Alexandra Lumpi for excellent technical assistance including mouse genotyping.
Funding Statement
The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This work was supported by the Jerome Lejeune Foundation research grant N 1911 (JS), the Eucor seed-money grant ‘Tuning interneurons to improve cognition in Down Syndrome’ (JS, JB, UH) and the Swiss National Science Foundation Project 310030_205198 (JB), Lighthouse Core Facility is funded in part by the Medical Faculty, University of Freiburg (project numbers 2023/A2-Fol; 2021/B3-Fol) and the DFG (project number 450392965).
Footnotes
Footnote Group
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Ethics statement
All experiments were approved by the Basel Cantonal Committee on Animal Experimentation according to federal and cantonal regulations.
Conflict of interest
JS was employed by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.
The remaining author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fncel.2026.1714586/full#supplementary-material
References
Untitled section
References
- Albayram Ö., Passlick S., Bilkei-Gorzo A., Zimmer A., Steinhäuser C. (2016). Physiological impact of CB1 receptor expression by hippocampal GABAergic interneurons. Pflugers Arch. Eur. J. Physiol. 468, 727–737. doi: 10.1007/s00424-015-1782-5,
- Antonarakis S. E., Skotko B. G., Rafii M. S., Strydom A., Pape S. E., Bianchi D. W., et al. (2020). Down syndrome. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 6, 1–20. doi: 10.1038/s41572-019-0143-7,
- Ben Abdallah N. M.-B., Slomianka L., Vyssotski A. L., Lipp H.-P. (2010). Early age-related changes in adult hippocampal neurogenesis in C57 mice. Neurobiol. Aging 31, 151–161. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.03.002,
- Bischofberger J., Engel D., Li L., Geiger J. R. P., Jonas P. (2006). Patch-clamp recording from mossy fiber terminals in hippocampal slices. Nat. Protoc. 1, 2075–2081. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.312,
- Caballero-Florán R. N., Conde-Rojas I., Oviedo Chávez A., Cortes-Calleja H., Lopez-Santiago L. F., Isom L. L., et al. (2016). Cannabinoid-induced depression of synaptic transmission is switched to stimulation when dopaminergic tone is increased in the globus pallidus of the rodent. Neuropharmacology 110, 407–418. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2016.08.002,
- Chakrabarti L., Best T. K., Cramer N. P., Carney R. S., Isaac J. T., Galdzicki Z., et al. (2010). Olig1 and Olig2 triplication causes developmental brain defects in down syndrome. Nat. Neurosci. 13, 927–934. doi: 10.1038/nn.2600,
- Chakrabarti L., Galdzicki Z., Haydar T. F. (2007). Defects in embryonic neuro- genesis and initial synapse formation in the forebrain of the Ts65Dn mouse model of down syndrome. J. Neurosci. 27, 11483–11495. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3406-07.2007,
- Clark C. A. C., Fernandez F., Sakhon S., Spanò G., Edgin J. O. (2017). The medial temporal memory system in down syndrome: translating animal models of hippocampal compromise. Hippocampus 27, 683–691. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22724,
- de Zorilla San Martin J., Donato C., Peixoto J., Aguirre A., Choudhary V., De Stasi A. M., et al. (2020). Alterations of specific cortical GABAergic circuits underlie abnormal network activity in a mouse model of down syndrome. eLife 9:58731, 1–23. doi: 10.7554/ELIFE.58731
- Desai S. S. (1997). Down syndrome: a review of the literature. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 84, 279–285. doi: 10.1016/S1079-2104(97)90343-7,
- Di Franco N., Drutel G., Roullot-Lacarrière V., Julio-Kalajzic F., Lalanne V., Grel A., et al. (2022). Differential expression of the neuronal CB1 cannabinoid receptor in the hippocampus of male Ts65Dn down syndrome mouse model. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 119:103705. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2022.103705,
- Dierssen M. (2012). Down syndrome: the brain in trisomic mode. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 844–858. doi: 10.1038/nrn3314,
- Dubovyk V., Manahan-Vaughan D. (2019). Gradient of expression of dopamine D2 receptors along the dorsoventral axis of the hippocampus. Front. Synaptic Neurosci. 11:28. doi: 10.3389/fnsyn.2019.00028,
- Elgueta C., Bartos M. (2019). Dendritic inhibition differentially regulates excitability of dentate gyrus parvalbumin-expressing interneurons and granule cells. Nat. Commun. 10:5561. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13533-3,
- Fernandez F., Morishita W., Zuniga E., Nguyen J., Blank M., Malenka R. C., et al. (2007). Pharmacotherapy for cognitive impairment in a mouse model of down syndrome. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 411–413. doi: 10.1038/nn1860,
- Freund T. F., Katona I., Piomelli D. (2003). Role of endogenous cannabinoids in synaptic signaling. Physiol. Rev. 83, 1017–1066. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00004.2003,
- Geiger J., Bischofberger J., Vida I., Fröbe U., Pfitzinger S., Weber H., et al. (2002). Patch-clamp recording in brain slices with improved slicer technology. Pflugers Arch. 443, 491–501. doi: 10.1007/s00424-001-0735-3,
- Guzman S. J., Schlögl A., Schmidt-Hieber C. (2014). Stimfit: quantifying electrophysiological data with Python. Front. Neuroinform. 8:16. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2014.00016
- Hefft S., Jonas P. (2005). Asynchronous GABA release generates long-lasting inhibition at a hippocampal interneuron-principal neuron synapse. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 1319–1328. doi: 10.1038/nn1542,
- Heigele S., Sultan S., Toni N., Bischofberger J. (2016). Bidirectional GABAergic control of action potential firing in newborn hippocampal granule cells. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 263–270. doi: 10.1038/nn.4218,
- Hernández-González S., Ballestín R., López-Hidalgo R., Gilabert-Juan J., Blasco-Ibáñez J. M., Crespo C., et al. (2015). Altered distribution of hippocampal interneurons in the murine down syndrome model Ts65Dn. Neurochem. Res. 40, 151–164. doi: 10.1007/s11064-014-1479-8,
- Hu H., Gan J., Jonas P. (2014). Interneurons fast-spiking, parvalbumin⁺ GABAergic interneurons: from cellular design to microcircuit function. Science 345:1255263. doi: 10.1126/science.1255263,
- Hyde L. A., Frisone D. F., Crnic L. S. (2001). Ts65Dn mice, a model for down syndrome, have deficits in context discrimination learning suggesting impaired hippocampal function. Behav. Brain Res. 118, 53–60. doi: 10.1016/S0166-4328(00)00313-2,
- Katona I., Sperlágh B., Sík A., Käfalvi A., Vizi E. S., Mackie K., et al. (1999). Presynaptically located CB1 cannabinoid receptors regulate GABA release from axon terminals of specific hippocampal interneurons. J. Neurosci. 19, 4544–4558. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-11-04544.1999
- Kempadoo K. A., Mosharov E. V., Choi S. J., Sulzer D., Kandel E. R. (2016). Dopamine release from the locus coeruleus to the dorsal hippocampus promotes spatial learning and memory. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113, 14835–14840. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1616515114,
- Kleschevnikov A. M., Belichenko P. V., Gall J., George L., Nosheny R., Maloney M. T., et al. (2012). Increased efficiency of the GABAA and GABAB receptor-mediated neurotransmission in the Ts65Dn mouse model of down syndrome. Neurobiol. Dis. 45, 683–691. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2011.10.009,
- Kleschevnikov A. M., Belichenko P. V., Villar A. J., Epstein C. J., Malenka R. C., Mobley W. C. (2004). Hippocampal long-term potentiation suppressed by in-creased inhibition in the Ts65Dn mouse, a genetic model of down syndrome. J. Neurosci. 24, 8153–8160. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1766-04.2004,
- Kraushaar U., Jonas P. (2000). Efficacy and stability of quantal GABA release at a hippocampal interneuron-principal neuron synapse. J. Neurosci. 20, 5594–5607. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.20-15-05594.2000,
- Leutgeb J. K., Leutgeb S., Moser M. B., Moser E. I. (2007). Pattern separation in the dentate gyrus and CA3 of the hippocampus. Science 315:5801. doi: 10.1126/science.1135801,
- Lodge M., Hernandez M.-C., Schulz J., Bischofberger J. (2020). Sparsification of AP firing in adult-born hippocampal granule cells via voltage-dependent α5-GABAA receptors. SSRN Electron. J. doi: 10.1101/2020.07.22.216200
- Madar A. D., Ewell L. A., Jones M. V. (2019). Pattern separation of spiketrains in hippocampal neurons. Sci. Rep. 9:5282. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41503-8,
- Malenka R. C., Nicoll R. A. (1999). Long-term potentiation – a decade of Progress? Science 285, 1870–1874. doi: 10.1126/science.285.5435.1870
- Martínez-Cué C., Martínez P., Rueda N., Vidal R., García S., Vidal V., et al. (2013). Reducing GABAA α5 receptor-mediated inhibition rescues functional and neuromorphological deficits in a mouse model of down syndrome. J. Neurosci. 33, 3953–3966. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1203-12.2013,
- McDonald A. J. (2021). Expression of the type 1 cannabinoid receptor (CB1R) in CCK-immunoreactive axon terminals in the basolateral amygdala of the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta). Neurosci. Lett. 745:135503. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2020.135503,
- McHugh T. J., Jones M. W., Quinn J. J., Balthasar N., Coppari R., Elmquist J. K., et al. (2007). Dentate gyrus NMDA receptors mediate rapid pattern separation in the hippocampal network. Science 317:263. doi: 10.1126/science.1140263,
- Morozov Y. M., Freund T. (2003). Post-natal development of type 1 cannabinoid receptor immunoreactivity in the rat hippocampus. Eur. J. Neurosci. 18, 1213–1222. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02852.x
- Müller-Komorowska D., Opitz T., Elzoheiry S., Schweizer M., Ambrad Giovannetti E., Beck H. (2020). Nonspecific expression in limited excitatory cell populations in interneuron-targeting Cre-driver lines can have large functional effects. Front. Neural Circuits 14, 1–13. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2020.00016,
- Myers C. E., Scharfman H. E. (2011). Pattern separation in the dentate gyrus: a role for the CA3 back projection. Hippocampus 21:828. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20828,
- Navarrete M., Araque A. (2008). Endocannabinoids mediate neuron-astrocyte communication. Neuron 57, 883–893. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.01.029,
- Navarro-Romero A., Vázquez-Oliver A., Gomis-González M., Garzón-Montesinos C., Falcón-Moya R., Pastor A., et al. (2019). Cannabinoid type-1 receptor blockade restores neurological phenotypes in two models for down syndrome. Neurobiol. Dis. 125, 92–106. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2019.01.014,
- Nguyen R., Sivakumaran S., Lambe E. K., Kim J. C. (2024). Ventral hippocampal cholecystokinin interneurons gate contextual reward memory. iScience 27:108824. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.108824,
- Nordin K., Pedersen R., Falahati F., Johansson J., Grill F., Andersson M., et al. (2025). Two long-axis dimensions of hippocampal-cortical integration support memory function across the adult lifespan. eLife 13:RP97658. doi: 10.7554/eLife.97658
- Pérez-Cremades D., Hernández S., Blasco-Ibáñez J. M., Crespo C., Nacher J., Varea E. (2010). Alteration of inhibitory circuits in the somatosensory cortex of Ts65Dn mice, a model for down’s syndrome. J. Neural Transm. 117, 445–455. doi: 10.1007/s00702-010-0376-9,
- Reeves R. H., Irving N. G., Moran T. H., Wohn A., Kitt C., Sisodia S. S., et al. (1995). A mouse model for down syndrome exhibits learning and behaviour deficits. Nat. Genet. 11, 177–184. doi: 10.1038/ng1095-177,
- Reinholdt L. G., Ding Y., Gilbert G. T., Czechanski A., Solzak J. P., Roper R. J., et al. (2011). Molecular characterization of the translocation breakpoints in the down syndrome mouse model Ts65Dn. Mamm. Genome 22, 685–691. doi: 10.1007/s00335-011-9357-z,
- Rueda N., Flórez J., Dierssen M., Martínez-Cué C. (2020). Translational validity and implications of pharmacotherapies in preclinical models of down syndrome. Prog. Brain Res. 251, 245–268. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2019.10.001
- Savanthrapadian S., Meyer T., Elgueta C., Booker S. A., Vida I., Bartos M. (2014). Synaptic properties of SOM-and CCK-expressing cells in dentate gyrus interneuron networks. J. Neurosci. 34, 8197–8209. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5433-13.2014,
- Schulz J. M., Knoflach F., Hernandez M. C., Bischofberger J. (2018). Dendrite-targeting interneurons control synaptic NMDA-receptor activation via nonlinear α5-GABAA receptors. Nat. Commun. 9, 1–16. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06004-8,
- Schulz J. M., Knoflach F., Hernandez M. C., Bischofberger J. (2019). Enhanced dendritic inhibition and impaired NMDAR activation in a mouse model of down syndrome. J. Neurosci. 39, 5210–5221. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2723-18.2019,
- Serra M. P., Boi M., Lai Y., Trucas M., Fernández-Teruel A., Corda M. G., et al. (2024). Acute stress induces different changes on the expression of CB1 receptors in the hippocampus of two lines of male rats differing in their response to stressors. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 245:173901. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2024.173901,
- Smith G. K., Kesner R. P., Korenberg J. R. (2014). Dentate gyrus mediates cognitive function in the Ts65Dn/DnJ mouse model of down syndrome. Hippocampus 24, 354–362. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22229,
- Tsotsokou G., Sotiropoulou I., Stampolitis K., Oikonomou G. D., Avdi A., Papatheodoropoulos C. (2025). Cannabinoid modulation of excitability and short-term neuronal dynamics in the dorsal and ventral hippocampus. Biology 14:642. doi: 10.3390/biology14060642,
- Uguagliati B., Al-Absi A.-R., Stagni F., Emili M., Giacomini A., Guidi S., et al. (2021). Early appearance of developmental alterations in the dendritic tree of the hippocampal granule cells in the Ts65Dn model of down syndrome. Hippocampus 31, 435–447. doi: 10.1002/hipo.23303,
- Witton J., Padmashri R., Zinyuk L. E., Popov V. I., Kraev I., Line S. J., et al. (2015). Hippocampal circuit dysfunction in the Tc1 mouse model of down syndrome. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1291–1298. doi: 10.1038/nn.4072,
Associated Data
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.