Effects of cannabidiol on vacuous chewing movements, plasma glucose and oxidative stress indices in rats administered high dose risperidone.

Abstract

Atypical antipsychotics, despite their rapid dissociation from dopamine receptors and reduced tendency to induce oxidative stress, have been associated with difficult-to-manage movement disorders, including tardive dyskinesia (TD). The study set out to investigate the effects of cannabidiol (CBD), a potent antioxidant, on risperidone-induced behavioural and motor disturbances; namely vacuous chewing movements (VCM), and oxidative stress markers (e.g. superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), reduced glutathione (GSH), malondialdehyde (MDA), Nitric oxide (NO), and DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl)). Oral risperidone (10 mg/kg) or oral CBD (5 mg/kg) were administered to six experimental groups. While risperidone alone was administered for 28 days, CBD concomitantly or in sequential order with risperidone, was administered for 28 days; and CBD alone was administered for 21 days. Behavioural, motor, and specific biochemical parameters, which included VCM, muscle tone, fasting blood sugar (FBS), and oxidative stress markers were assessed at different time points after the last dose of medication. Oral CBD (5 mg/kg) significantly reduced risperidone-induced elevated FBS when given after the administration of risperidone. Oral CBD also had effects on VCM when administered before risperidone and similarly, attenuated risperidone-induced increased muscle tone. It was also established that concomitant or sequential administration of CBD and risperidone did not have any adverse effects on cognition or locomotion. Both CBD and risperidone increased the activity of antioxidant enzymes and decreased the activity of pro-oxidant enzymes. This study suggests CBD could mitigate metabolic dysregulation and extrapyramidal side effects associated with risperidone without producing cognitive impairments.

Untitled section

Subject terms: Biochemistry, Neuroscience, Medical research

Article notes

Untitled section

Received 2022 May 13; Accepted 2022 Nov 11; Collection date 2022.

Author notes

Introduction

The reintroduction of clozapine to the market in 1989 after the first attempt in 1970^1,2 heralded a new generation of antipsychotics referred to as atypical antipsychotics (AAPs) or second-generation antipsychotics, which include clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, lurasidone, and ziprasidone among others. These antipsychotics are called atypical because of their serotonin 5-HT_2A receptor antagonism in combination with D₂ receptor antagonism properties^3,4. Initially, they were believed to carry a lower burden of extrapyramidal side effects (EPS) such as parkinsonism, acute dystonia, akathisia, and akinesia compared to the typical or first-generation antipsychotics; but more recent studies have disagreed with this assertion. Parkinsonism, for example, has been observed to increase in frequency with high doses of atypical antipsychotics^5–7. In addition to EPS, antipsychotics have significant metabolic side effects like weight gain, diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidaemia which can increase the risk of cardiovascular mortality^8–10.

Apart from the acute motor disorders, other movement disorders associated with atypical antipsychotics include neuroleptic malignant syndrome, tardive dystonia, and tardive dyskinesia (TD)^11,12. Tardive dyskinesia is a late-onset movement disorder that is potentially irreversible. Though the pathophysiology is not yet clearly elucidated, dopamine receptor upregulation and supersensitivity, dysfunction of other neurotransmitters such as glutamate, γ-amino butyric acid (GABA), serotonin, neurotoxicity, oxidative stress, changes in synaptic plasticity, defective neuroadaptive signalling, and defective antipsychotic metabolising enzymes have been implicated in the aetiology^13–15. Risk factors for TD include duration of antipsychotic use, age, genetics, and ethnicity^16–19.

It was initially thought that the incidence of TD would decline with increasing use of AAPs, because of the rapid dissociation of most AAP molecules from receptor sites, reduced tendency to induce oxidative stress, and the ability of most AAPs to bind 5HT₂ receptors thereby reducing the tonic effects of dopamine in the basal ganglia^20–22. Despite a 30% reduction in the prevalence of TD with AAPs compared with typical antipsychotics^23,24, the rate of 20% of TD with AAP is still high.

While AAP-induced movement disorders have been observed, there appears to be little or no association with oxidative stress indicators^25–27. Some authors have also suggested that AAPs, following chronic administration, can reduce pro-oxidants and increase GSH²⁸. Another study observed an increase in antioxidant defence enzymes and lipid peroxidation in rat brains after chronic haloperidol administration but there was no change after chronic risperidone, clozapine, and olanzapine administration²⁵. The mechanisms by which AAPs induce movement disorders, such as TD, remain a puzzle considering that these disorders have been associated with an imbalance between pro-oxidants and antioxidants in various studies^17,29–31. It is therefore important to investigate the association between VCM, AAPs, antioxidants, and pro-oxidants in an animal model of TD using risperidone as the prototype APP.

Though the mechanism by which AAPs influenced oxidative stress is poorly understood, AAPs have been observed to alleviate microglia-induced oxidative stress by reducing free radical production in the microglia³². Risperidone has been postulated to reduce reactive oxygen species (ROS) production through the regulation of antioxidant enzymes in the brain³³. In contrast, risperidone has been shown to induce oxidative stress in the liver through increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, thus leading to mitochondrial collapse, lysosomal membrane disruption, GSH depletion and lipid peroxidation³⁴. Pancreatic damage, including pancreatitis, is also associated with risperidone^35–37, and oxidative stress may play a role here as pancreatitis is associated with oxidative stress^38–40. The damage to pancreatic β cells following AAP-induced glucose intolerance may be related to increased free radical production^41,42. In addition, amelioration of oxidative stress through the administration of a potent antioxidant may also reduce the risk of metabolic syndrome and improve medication adherence and overall quality of life. Identifying an ideal potent antioxidant that can alleviate the side effects of the AAP is an avenue of research that is worth pursuing.

There is much interest in Cannabidiol (CBD), a non-psychoactive and non-reinforcing cannabis sativa constituent^43,44, which several studies have confirmed to have anti-oxidative, anti-inflammatory, and neuroprotective properties^45,46. It has also shown promise in the prevention and treatment of movement disorders, including tardive dyskinesia, in animal models^47,48. Furthermore, it is devoid of any major adverse reactions in both animal and human studies^49–51, thus making CBD the ideal antioxidant for this study. CBD may, however, be similar to AAPs in its pharmacological profile because in animal models it has antipsychotic-like effects without inducing extrapyramidal-like effects⁵².

Meanwhile, clinical studies on the glycaemic effects of CBD have yielded conflicting results as one study observed an improvement in insulin secretion while another did not observe an improvement in glycaemic control⁵³. As a best practice, it is prudent and essential to study the effects of CBD in combination with AAPs using risperidone as a prototype to affirm if synergistic actions of the two compounds (CBD and risperidone) can mitigate adverse effects, especially cognitive and metabolic side effects. Our aim was to determine if CBD can ameliorate risperidone induced VCM and reduce the metabolic side effects of risperidone. Our secondary objective was to explore the association between risperidone-induced VCM and oxidative stress indices.

Materials and methods

Animals

Male Wistar adult rats used in this study were obtained from the colony of the Nigerian Institute of Medical Research (NIMR), Yaba, Lagos, Nigeria. The animals were kept in clean polypropylene cages in well-ventilated, and hygienic compartments maintained under standard environmental conditions. The rats were also fed with standard rodent pellets (produced by Ladokun Feed Plc, Ibadan, Nigeria), and with water ad libitum. The animals were acclimatized for a period of 2 weeks before experimental procedures were undertaken in accordance with the United States National Institutes of Health Guidelines for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals in Biomedical Research⁵⁴. This study was also approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Yaba, Lagos, Nigeria (IRB/16/329) and Stellenbosch University’s Health Research Ethics Committee: Animal Care and Use (SU-ACUD16-00137).

Drugs

Cannabidiol [(–)-Cannabidiol, GMP (Cannabidiolum)] (CBD) (VAKOS X, a.s., Permova 28a, 186 00 Praha 8, in Czech Republic. Company number: 04801938). The drug was supplied in fine granule form with the amount administered weekly calculated and dissolved in 70% ethanol as recommended by the manufacturers. It was also diluted with distilled water. CBD was administered orally. Risperidone tablets (manufactured by Janseen Pharmaceuticals Beerse, Belgium) were dissolved in distilled water and administered orally.

Experimental design

The experimental groups (n = 51) consisted of six groups: A (n = 10), Group B (n = 9), Group C (n = 8), Group D (n = 8), Group E (n = 8) and Group F (n = 8).

Pharmacological administration was as follows: Group A (Control (Distilled water) 2 ml p.o.), Group B (Oral CBD 5 mg/kg/oral), Group C (Risperidone 10 mg/kg/oral), Group D (CBD 5 mg/kg/oral + Risperidone 10 mg/kg/oral), Group E (Risperidone 10 mg/kg/oral then CBD 5 mg/kg/oral), Group F (CBD 5 mg/kg/oral then Risperidone 10 mg/kg/oral). Some researchers used 10 mg/kg of risperidone to induce VCM⁵⁵. According to some investigators, effective doses of CBD in rats range between 2.5 and 10 mg/kg⁵⁶.

In Group D, CBD was administered once daily for 28 days, while risperidone was administered concomitantly but in divided doses for 28 days. In Group C, Risperidone 10 mg/kg/oral only was administered daily in divided doses for 28 days, while administration for Groups A (Control (Distilled water only) 2 ml p.o.) and B (Oral CBD 5 mg/kg/oral only) was once daily for 21 days. In Group E, Risperidone 10 mg/kg/oral was administered for 28 days before the administration of CBD 5 mg/kg/oral for 28 days and in Group F, CBD (5 mg/kg/oral) was administered for 28 days before the administration of risperidone (10 mg/kg/oral) for 28 days. VCM was assessed at 8 h, 24 h, and on Day 8 after the last dose of the medication. Day 8 VCM was used in the analysis because persistent VCM after withdrawal of medications is the appropriate model of TD, though VCM observed after Day 8 have been shown to persist for a long time⁵⁵.

The rats were fasted overnight after the last meal at 7 pm until 7 am when blood was taken for FBS measurement. A fine sterile disposable hypodermic needle was used to puncture the rats at the end of their tails, and enough blood was dropped on a portable glucometer device, Accu-Chek Performa^® (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany), to obtain a FBS reading.

For all groups, weight and FBS were measured the day before administration of medication and a day after administration of the last dose of medication.

Notably, risperidone-induced FBS changes in rats have been shown to be stable over time⁵⁷.

Behavioural assays

Elevated plus maze, open field, rota-rod, and object recognition tests were used to assess behavioural responses. For all groups, behavioural assessments were carried out 24 h after the last dose of medication or distilled water (control group).

VCM were assessed by placing each animal in individual transparent glass plexiform cages. Each animal was allowed to acclimatize for 5 min before counting started. The number of VCM (mouth openings in the vertical plane not directed toward physical material) was counted for 10 min⁵⁸. Day 8 VCM was used in the analysis because persistent VCM after withdrawal of medications is the appropriate model of TD; though VCM observed after Day 8 have been shown to persist for a long time⁵⁵. Methodologies used in behavioural assays were described in detail in our previously published study⁴⁸.

Elevated plus-maze test

Anxiety was monitored using this test⁵⁹. The elevated plus-maze consisted of two open arms (30 × 5 cm), and two closed arms (30 × 5 × 15 cm) that extended from the central platform (5 × 5 cm). The entire maze was elevated to 40 cm above the floor. During the first 5 min of free exploration, the number of entries into and the time spent in the open and closed arms were recorded. An entry was defined as the point at which the animal placed all four paws onto the arm.

Open-field test

This test was used to assess locomotion in the study^60,61. The number of line crossings is used as a measure of locomotor activity. The number of line crosses and the frequency of rearing are usually used as a measure of locomotor activity, exploration, and anxiety. A high frequency of these behaviours indicates increased locomotion and exploration and/or a lower level of anxiety⁶⁰. The open-field box is a rectangular area composed of a hard floor measuring 36 cm × 36 cm × 26 cm and made of a white painted wood. The floor was divided by permanent red markings into 16 equal squares at the bottom. Each rat was introduced singly into one corner of the field and after each session, the area was cleaned with 70% alcohol to eliminate olfactory bias, and the area was thereafter allowed to dry before introducing a new animal. The locomotor activity was measured for 10 min. A high frequency of these behaviours indicates increased locomotion⁶⁰.

Object recognition test

This test was used to study drug-induced cognitive effects⁶². Each animal was placed in a plexiform glass transparent cage and was allowed to acclimatise for 5 min before two similar spherical objects (Balls) were introduced. The animal was allowed to spend 10 more minutes in the cage with the objects and the time the animal spent exploring the objects was measured with a stopwatch by an observer before the animal was removed. The animal was re-introduced into the cage after an hour, and a different object (square shaped) was added into the cage before the animal was re-introduced, while the previous objects (Balls) were removed. Time spent exploring both new and old objects was measured for 10 min by two different observers using stopwatches. The time spent by the animal using its nose to touch the object was measured while the time spent using other parts of the body were ignored.

Rota-rod test

The method was used for the assessment of motor coordination, balance, and grip strength in rodents⁶³. A rota-rod treadmill device (Ugo Basile No. 7600 Varese, Italy) was used for this purpose. The rats were trained to remain on slowly moving (16 revolutions min⁻¹) rods of 5 cm in diameter for 150 s by walking. The animals were then placed on the treadmill after training and the time spent on the treadmill before falling was measured for each animal.

Antioxidant indices assays

Animals were sacrificed on Day 8 after the administration of the last dose of pharmacological agent by first anesthetizing them with phenobarbitone before cervical dislocation. Methodologies used in determining antioxidant indices were also described in detail in our previously-published study⁴⁸. The following antioxidant indices were determined spectrometrically.

Malondialdehyde (MDA)

MDA is an index of lipid peroxidation, and it was determined using the method of Buege⁶⁴.

Reduced glutathione (GSH)

The GSH content of the brain as non-protein sulfhydryl was estimated according to the method described by Sedlak and Lindsay⁶⁵.

Catalase (CAT)

CAT activity was determined according to the method of Sinha⁶⁶.

Superoxide dismutase (SOD)

SOD activity was determined as described by Sun and Zigma⁶⁷.

Nitric oxide (NO) scavenging activity

This was measured by the Griess reagent assay.

DPPH scavenging assay

This was determined using the methods described by Kedare and Singh⁶⁸.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics of relevant study variables (weight, FBS, VCM, and behavioural and biochemical assays) are presented using measures of centrality and dispersion (mean and standard deviation). The normality of distribution of the data was evaluated using histograms and supported by the results of the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Comparison of means was done using one way-ANOVA. When group differences were statistically significant (p-value < 0.05), pairwise comparisons or post-hoc tests were done. Omnibus tests were also used with post-hoc comparisons. Bonferroni corrections were used to adjust for multiple comparisons when necessary.

Statement on reporting experimental procedures

Reporting in this study follows the recommendations in the ARRIVE guidelines.

Ethical statement

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of NIMR, Yaba, Lagos, Nigeria (IRB/16/329) and Stellenbosch University’s Health Research Ethics Committee: Animal Care and Use (SU-ACUD16-00137).

Results

Effects of interventions on fasting blood sugar (FBS) and weight gain

Before the administration of medications, there was a statistically significant difference in FBS between groups (F = 14.337, p < 0.001, df = 5). On post-hoc analysis, there was a significant between-group difference in FBS pre-medication in Groups D and E (p < 0.001), Groups C and E (p < 0.001), Groups E and F (p < 0.001), Groups E and A (p < 0.001), Groups E and B (p = 0.001), and Groups F and B (p = 0.016).

Similarly, after the last dose of medication administration, there was a statistically significant difference in the mean FBS between groups (F = 34.079, p < 0.001, df = 5). On post-hoc analysis, there was a significant difference in FBS between Groups D and E (p = 0.009), D and A (p < 0.001), D and B (p < 0.001), C and E (p = 0.004), C and A (p < 0.001), C and B (p = 0.006), E and F (p < 0.001), E and A (p < 0.001), F and A (p < 0.001), F and B (p = 0.006) (Fig. 1).

Figure 1Fasting blood sugar across groups after the last dose of medications. Observations of the post-pharmacological interventions FBS values in each group indicated CBD influenced the FBS values. *Statistically significant difference.

There was no statistical difference in mean weight before (F = 0.469, p = 0.797, df = 5) and after (F = 2.837, p = 0.062, df = 5) the last dose of administration of pharmacological agents. After the last dose of medications, subjects in Group D had the highest mean weight gain (45.5 ± 40.0), while those in Group F had the lowest mean weight gain of the six groups (3.2 ± 38.4). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the weight between the groups (F = 1.831, p = 0.127, df = 5) (Table 1).

Table 1Mean weight gain, object recognition, and locomotor activity after the last dose of pharmacological intervention. Significant values are in bold.

Variable	Mean ± SD	F	p-value		Mean ± SD	F	p-value
Mean weight gain				Discrimination Index
Group A	3.2 ± 38.4	1.831df = 5	0.127	Group A	0.7 ± 0.2	1.611df = 5	0.178
Group B	10.8 ± 17.8			Group B	0.3 ± 0.6
Group C	33.4 ± 35.1			Group C	0.5 ± 0.3
Group D	45.5 ± 40.0			Group D	0.3 ± 0.3
Group E	13.8 ± 35.4			Group E	0.7 ± 0.4
Group F	35.4 ± 42.4			Group F	0.5 ± 0.5
VCM				ROTA ROD
Group A	0.3 ± 0.5	9.131df = 5	0.000	Group A	62.7 ± 35.6	2.738df = 5	0.031
Group B	0.0 ± 0.0			Group B	63.9 ± 24.2
Group C	4.8 ± 3.5			Group C	23.8 ± 21.9
Group D	2.5 ± 1.4			Group D	94.2 ± 34.4
Group E	2.3 ± 1.6			Group E	35.1 ± 23.3
Group F	1.0 ± 1.0			Group F	77.0 ± 82.9
Calculated open arm				Line crossing
Group A	10.0 ± 0.5	0.334df = 5		Group A	5.9 ± 4.3	2.262df = 5	0.092
Group B	11.1 ± 3.8			Group B	5.9 ± 5.9
Group C	12.5 ± 2.0		0.890	Group C	15.1 ± 14.6
Group D	16.7 ± 0.8			Group D	2.8 ± 1.3
Group E	12.5 ± 0.6			Group E	10.1 ± 5.9
Group F	12.5 ± 1.0			Group F	8.5 ± 7.9

Behavioural assays after the last dose of pharmacological interventions

VCM

After the last dose of pharmacological intervention, there was a statistically significant difference in VCM between the groups (F = 9.131, p < 0.001, df = 5). On post-hoc analysis, there were a significant difference between Groups D and B (p = 0.043), C and F (p = 0.003), C and A (0.000), C and B (p = 0.047), and E and B (p = 0.038) after the last dose of the medication. See Fig. 2.

Figure 2Vacuous chewing movements (VCM) across groups after the last dose of medications. CBD had effects on risperidone induced VCM. *Statistically significant difference.

Calculated open arm

There was no significant difference in the mean difference of the duration spent in the open arm of the elevated plus maze across the groups (F = 0.334, p = 0.890, df = 5).

Discrimination index

There was no significant difference in the mean difference of the discrimination index across the groups (F = 1.611, p = 0.178, df = 5).

Line crossing

There was no significant difference in the mean difference of locomotor activity across the groups (F = 2.262, p = 0.092, df = 5).

Rota rod

There was a statistically significant difference between the Rota Rod values between groups (F = 2.738, p = 0.031, df = 5). This difference was noted between Groups A and B (p = 0.019) and groups B and F (p = 0.027) (Fig. 3).

Brain oxidative stress parameters

Brain GSH

There was a statistically significant difference in brain GSH between groups (F = 6.156, p < 0.001, df = 5). On post-hoc analysis, the differences were significant between Groups C and A (p = 0.001), E and A (p = 0.020), F and A (p = 0.000), and A and B (p = 0.003).

Brain SOD

There was a statistically significant difference in brain SOD between groups (F = 11.534, p < 0.001, df = 5). On post-hoc analysis, there were significant differences between Groups D and F (p = 0.006), D and A (p = 0.016), D and B (p = 0.012), C and F (p = 0.005), C and A (p = 0.012), C and B (p = 0.011), and F and A (p = 0.010).

Brain CAT

Significant differences were observed in the brain CAT values between groups (F = 13.870, p < 0.001, df = 5). On post-hoc analysis, these differences were observed between D and F (p = 0.002), D and A (p = 0.004), D and B (p = 0.002), C and F (p = 0.005), C and A (p = 0.008), C and B (p = 0.004), E and F (p = 0.047), E and B (p = 0.041), and A and B (p = 0.001).

Brain DPPH

Similarly, a significant difference was observed in the brain DPPH values between groups (F = 4.421, p = 0.004, df = 5). On post-hoc analysis, these differences were observed between Groups D and E (p = 0.033), D and A (p = 0.013), D and B (p = 0.000).

Brain NO

Values significantly differed between groups (F = 4.620, p = 0.006, df = 5). On post-hoc analysis, the differences were observed between Groups D and F (p = 0.041), D and B (p = 0.006), C and B (p = 0.002), A and B (p = 0.037).

Brain MDA

Brain MDA values did not significantly differ between groups (F = 0.617, p = 0.688, df = 5) (Fig. 4).

Inter-group comparison of assay of antioxidant indices assay after the last dose of medications. There were intergroup differences in the Brain’s GSH, SOD, CAT, SOD and DPPH results, but there were no intergroup differences in the brain’s MDA. Group 1: Control Group; Group 2: Cannabidiol only; Group 3: Risperidone only; Group 4: Cannabidiol + Risperidone; Group 5: Risperidone then Cannabidiol; Group 6: Cannabidiol then Risperidone. P1 = P-value for brain CAT differences between groups; P2 = P-value for brain DPPH differences between groups; P3 = P-value for brain GSH differences between groups; P4 = P-value for brain NO differences between groups; P5 = P-value for brain SOD differences between groups; P6 = P-value for brain MDA differences between groups. — Figure 4Inter-group comparison of assay of antioxidant indices assay after the last dose of medications. There were intergroup differences in the Brain’s GSH, SOD, CAT, SOD and DPPH results, but there were no intergroup differences in the brain’s MDA. Group 1: Control Group; Group 2: Cannabidiol only; Group 3: Risperidone only; Group 4: Cannabidiol + Risperidone; Group 5: Risperidone then Cannabidiol; Group 6: Cannabidiol then Risperidone. P₁ = P-value for brain CAT differences between groups; P₂ = P-value for brain DPPH differences between groups; P₃ = P-value for brain GSH differences between groups; P₄ = P-value for brain NO differences between groups; P₅ = P-value for brain SOD differences between groups; P₆ = P-value for brain MDA differences between groups.

Discussion

The present study is a continuation of our studies on the effectiveness of CBD in the treatment of symptoms of TD in an animal model. In this set of analyses, we focused on the synergistic effects of oral CBD and oral risperidone on weight, FBS, behavioural and oxidative stress parameters in the brain. We also assessed the effect of oral CBD on oral risperidone-induced VCM. We did not observe a significant increase in weight after the last dose of medication when risperidone alone and risperidone co-administered with CBD were compared. Concomitant administration of risperidone and CBD did not ameliorate VCM, unlike what we observed with haloperidol-induced VCM in our previous study⁴⁸; however, there were distinct changes in antioxidant and pro-oxidant compounds, thus suggesting that both risperidone and CBD reduced oxidative stress in our experiments.

Moreover, our investigation did not reveal a significant change in weight when pre- and post-medication weights of all groups were compared, though association of risperidone with weight increase has been documented in animal and human studies^69–72. Risperidone-induced weight gain may be associated with histamine H₁ receptor antagonism, leptin resistance, and consequent disinhibition of food intake⁷³. CBD has also been shown to decrease weight in animal studies⁷⁴, but other studies contradict these observations^75,76.

Comparison of FBS values across groups strongly suggests that oral CBD on its own can stabilize blood glucose. Most studies on the hypoglycaemic effects of CBD have reported similar findings, though experimental designs and doses varied^77–79. Mechanisms of action may involve stimulation of insulin production by the beta-pancreatic cells and protective and regenerative effects on the beta cells^80,81. When given concurrently with risperidone, CBD may not be effective as a hypoglycaemic agent, but CBD given after risperidone as in Group E (Risperidone before CBD) obviously reduced FBS and appeared to have similar effects as CBD alone, indicating that CBD may be effective in lowering blood sugar if given after the administration of risperidone. Results of CBD given before risperidone (Group F) were similar to those of risperidone alone, suggesting that CBD may not be effective in lowering blood sugar if given before the administration of risperidone. These findings require confirmation with a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) study. Meanwhile, risperidone has been shown to increase total and active ghrelin levels as well as leptin, and prolactin levels in some studies; and these are associated with increased appetite and metabolic dysfunction⁷², while CBD was shown to reduce appetite and insulin resistance by lowering resistin levels in some studies⁸¹.

In this study, risperidone alone (Group C) induced more VCM than all the groups, but this was only significant with CBD before risperidone, CBD alone, and the control group. We also observed that CBD administered concomitantly and after risperidone resulted in less VCM count than risperidone alone, though this was not significant. Our observations suggested that though CBD ameliorated the VCM induced by risperidone, and the effect was not quite pronounced, it may have a protective effect if administered before risperidone, as in Group F. This is contrary to what was observed with haloperidol-induced VCM in an earlier study, where CBD (5 mg/kg) administered concomitantly with haloperidol significantly reduced VCM⁴⁸. We therefore propose that the aetiology and pathophysiology of risperidone-induced VCM may be different from that of haloperidol. Further investigations are needed on the aetiology and pathophysiology of risperidone-induced VCM.

In our model of motor coordination, balance, and grip strength, we observed that combinations of risperidone with CBD prevented the motor incoordination and increase in muscle tone associated with risperidone alone. The rats in the risperidone-alone group spent the least time on the treadmill, though this was only significant when compared with the group that received risperidone and CBD concomitantly (Group D), and the control (Group A). Risperidone is known to have a high affinity for D₂ receptors and M₄ receptors. D₂ receptors are involved in EPS, while M₄ receptors play a significant role in catalepsy, a condition where rodents have difficulty in changing externally-imposed posture^82,83.

CBD is known to interact with 5HT_1A and 5HT_2A receptors subtypes in the basal ganglia to ameliorate the EPS induced by D₂ receptor occupation^84,85. CBD also influences phosphoinositide metabolism stimulated by activation of muscarinic receptors⁸⁶. These factors may explain the effects of CBD in our experiment. To our knowledge, there are no published data on the effects of CBD on risperidone-induced movement disorders.

We could not confirm an anxiolytic effect for risperidone, either alone or in combination with CBD in our study using the elevated plus maze. This contrasts with a study which showed that risperidone at low dose induced an anxiolytic effect⁸⁷. CBD at a higher dose than what we used in this study has reported anxiolytic effects^47,86. We may not have observed an anxiolytic effect of different combinations of risperidone and CBD in our work because of the relatively low dose of CBD and high dose of risperidone. We expected the high dose of risperidone to affect the explorative activity and locomotion of the animals⁸⁷ in the open field test because the receptor occupancy of risperidone at a high dose is above 60% and at this level, 5-HT₂ blockade may not be protective against EPS with the development of parkinsonism and motor retardation⁸⁸. At this dose however, we did not observe any differences when risperidone alone was compared with CBD only and the control groups, thus indicating that risperidone alone may not produce motor retardation or decrease locomotion at a high dose in rats. This suggests that 5-HT₂ blockade may offer some protection.

In this study, there was no evidence of deterioration of cognitive function despite the high dose of risperidone. There was also no evidence for enhancement of cognitive function when risperidone was combined with CBD. Some clinical studies have observed an improvement in cognitive function in patients with schizophrenia on risperidone⁸⁹. Results from animal studies indicate improved cognition with CBD alone⁴⁷, but these results are contrasted by clinical studies that have found no clear clinical evidence of the positive benefits of CBD on cognition⁷⁵. There are no published studies on the cognitive effects of combining risperidone and CBD.

Effects of interventions on oxidative stress indices in the brain

Glutathione peroxidase (GPx) is the enzyme that catalyses the reaction between reduced GSH and hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) to form GSSG (glutathione disulfide), its oxidized form and water⁹⁰, and elevated GSH therefore indicated less activity of GPx. The control group (Group A) had a significantly higher GSH level in the brain compared to other groups, with either CBD or risperidone alone, or in combination at different points, thus indicating that GPx is not active in the control. Lower GSH levels were observed in CBD and risperidone groups compared with the control, suggesting that these groups stimulated glutathione peroxidase production, leading to increased use of reduced GSH, which is converted to oxidised GSH (GSSG), and therefore lower GSH levels, compared to the control group.

SOD activities increased in the risperidone alone group (Group C), risperidone plus CBD (Group D), and risperidone before CBD (Group E) when compared with CBD before risperidone (Group F), CBD alone, and the control. These observations suggest increased antioxidant activities in the risperidone alone group (Group C), risperidone plus CBD (Group D), and risperidone before CBD (Group E) compared to others. CAT activities in the brain reflected a similar pattern except that risperidone administered before CBD produced higher activity than CBD before risperidone and CBD alone.

Though the effect of atypical antipsychotics on oxidative stress enzymes is still being explored, one study suggests atypical antipsychotics increase the expression of SOD1 gene leading to an increase in SOD⁹¹. We know that SOD acts as a first line of defence against oxidative stress by converting superoxide radicals to hydrogen peroxide, which is in turn converted to water and oxygen by catalase and glutathione peroxidase. An increase in SOD activity may indicate antioxidant potential or a compensatory mechanism^92,93, depending on the level of pro-oxidants in the organ.

The lower level of GSH, coupled with the observed increased activity of SOD and CAT enzymes in risperidone alone, risperidone concomitantly administered with CBD, and risperidone before CBD groups suggests that both risperidone and CBD may have antioxidant effects. Meanwhile, CBD before risperidone antioxidant status (reduced SOD, CAT, and high GSH concentrations) compared to risperidone concomitantly administered with CBD and risperidone before CBD, suggests that CBD did not have a positive effect on oxidative stress when given before risperidone. We are not able to clearly explain our observation, which may be related to the ability of CBD to inhibit cytochrome P450 group of enzymes^49,94 involved in the metabolism of antipsychotics and an increased concentration of risperidone to a level where it behaves like a typical antipsychotic⁹⁵.

There were no significant group differences in MDA, a known marker of lipid peroxidation concentration in the brain, when all six groups were compared in this study. Another study also did not observe a change in lipid peroxidation in the brains of rats treated with risperidone after 45 and 90 days²⁵. A group of investigators, however, observed that risperidone decreased MDA levels in rat brains suggesting that it could have antioxidant effects²⁸. Relatedly, a clinical study claimed an increase in MDA levels in patients with schizophrenia, which was modified by atypical antipsychotics⁹². Some researchers have also observed a decrease in glutathione peroxidase (GPX) activity with an increase in MDA levels, suggesting an increase oxidative stress in schizophrenia patients on risperidone⁹⁶. Our study concurs with other studies showing that risperidone has antioxidant properties⁹². This may explain our observation that MDA activity in risperidone-alone animals was not increased when compared with CBD alone, or any of the CBD combinations with risperidone.

This study also observed reduced NO production in the risperidone-alone (Group C), and risperidone given concomitantly with CBD (Group D) groups compared with the control and CBD-alone groups. Both risperidone and CBD have been shown to reduce inducible NO synthase, and NO production by some researchers^97–102. Other studies that observed increased NO production in risperidone, however, contradict these reports^103–106. In this study, risperidone appears to be an effective antioxidant, but risperidone and CBD given concomitantly is as effective as risperidone alone. CBD alone (Group B) appeared to be less effective in reducing NO level, compared to risperidone alone (Group C), and risperidone given concomitantly with CBD (Group D). We are not aware of any studies that have examined the antioxidant status of CBD combined with risperidone.

Our observations of the antioxidant effects of risperidone support our proposal that the aetiology and pathophysiology of risperidone-induced VCM may be different from that of haloperidol because risperidone had antioxidant effects in our study and did not induce oxidative stress, in contrast to haloperidol⁵⁵. Earlier researchers also observed that sub-chronic treatment with risperidone did not increase the population of D₂ receptors in the rat striatum, in contrast to the actions of haloperidol^107,108. These observations suggest that oxidative stress has a role to play in the manifestation of movement disorders induced by haloperidol but may not be important in movement disorders produced by risperidone. The DPPH radical scavenging activities in the brain of all the groups were within the same range, but the risperidone plus CBD group (Group D) had fewer scavenging activities than the other groups. There is no known published study on DPPH radical scavenging activities in animals administered risperidone and CBD, but an in-vitro study used a DPPH assay to confirm the antioxidant status of risperidone¹⁰⁹.

In summary, we found that CBD ameliorated the increase in FBS induced by risperidone if given before or after risperidone, and improved muscle incoordination and tone induced by risperidone, but it did not significantly reduce risperidone-induced VCM. CBD may, however, have a protective effect against VCM if given before risperidone. Concomitant or sequential administration of CBD and risperidone did not have any adverse effects on cognition or locomotion. Both CBD and risperidone therefore exhibited antioxidant properties.

Limitations

First, 21 days of administration of CBD, and distilled water in the control group instead of 28 days is an important limitation of this study. All treatments should have the same duration; however, these data were drawn from a larger study that included haloperidol that was administered for 21 days. The IRB at the institute at which the experiments were conducted considered the same control to be adequate for the study involving haloperidol and risperidone.

Second, the animal model of TD used in this study may not be specific enough for TD, and may closely resemble EPS (e.g. Parkinsonian tremor, dystonia), even though only VCM that persisted after the 8th day was used in this study to reduce the probability that what was observed is EPS. Furthermore, the experimental paradigm used in this study closely resembles that of Bishnoi and Boparai¹¹⁰, and Marchese⁵⁵.

Another limitation observed in this study is that automated behavioural apparatus would have produced more precise and less biased measurements, but financial constraints prevented us from procuring this apparatus. It was not possible to measure oxidative stress indices in specific regions of the brain due to technical difficulties.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that a combination drug formulation of risperidone and CBD in clinical practice may have less metabolic dysregulation and extrapyramidal side effects than with risperidone alone, without producing cognitive impairments as seen with the olanzapine and samidorphan¹¹¹ combination. Such a combination may also improve the overall safety and tolerability of risperidone. Clinical studies will be required to prove the efficacy of risperidone and CBD combination. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies in both humans and animals are also necessary to further study risperidone and CBD drug-drug interactions.

Acknowledgements

Dr. Opeyemi Awofeso was involved in data analysis; Mr. Sunday Adenekan and Mr. Abiodun Doherty helped with the biochemical analysis; while Mr. Chiadika Chimeremeze, Mr. Hafeez Shittu, Hasnat Osibote, Damilola Oshunyinka, and Abisola Kolawole were the laboratory assistants who worked with the team in the conduct of the experiments.

Author contributions

J.K. and S.S. were responsible for the conceptualization of the study. The experiments were designed by J.K., S.S. and A.A. while J.K., O.A. and A.A. conducted the experiments. Manuscript, figures and tables were prepared by J.K. S.S. and J.O. supervised and validated the study for submission.

Funding

This research was supported by the South African Research Chair in PTSD hosted by the Stellenbosch University and funded by the Department of Science and Technology South Africa (No. 64811) and administered by the National Research Foundation. This work was also supported by Cannabis Science Inc. (No. S005181).

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Footnote Group

References

Untitled section

References

1.Crilly, J. The history of clozapine and its emergence in the US market: A review and analysis. History of Psychiatry, Vol. 18 (2007).
2.Cloud LJ, Zutshi D, Factor SA. Tardive dyskinesia: Therapeutic options for an increasingly common disorder. Neurotherapeutics. 2014;11(1):166–176. doi: 10.1007/s13311-013-0222-5.
3.Mauri MC, Paletta S, Maffini M, Colasanti A, Dragogna F, Di Pace C, et al. Clinical pharmacology of atypical antipsychotics: An update. EXCLI J. 2014;13:1163–1191.
4.Li P, Snyder GL, Vanover KE. Dopamine targeting drugs for the treatment of schizophrenia: Past, present and future. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2016;646:3385–3403. doi: 10.2174/1568026616666160608084834.
5.Peluso MJ, Lewis SW, Barnes TRE, Jones PB. Extrapyramidal motor side-effects of first and second-generation antipsychotic drugs. Br. J. Psychiatry. 2012;200(5):101485. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.111.101485.
6.Divac N, Prostran M, Jakovcevski I, Cerovac N. Second-generation antipsychotics and extrapyramidal adverse effects. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014;2014:656370. doi: 10.1155/2014/656370.
7.Shireen E. Experimental treatment of antipsychotic-induced movement disorders. J. Exp. Pharmacol. 2016;8:1–10. doi: 10.2147/JEP.S63553.
8.Ozasa R, Okada T, Nadanaka S, Nagamine T, Zyryanova A, Harding H, et al. The antipsychotic olanzapine induces apoptosis in insulin-secreting pancreatic β cells by blocking perk-mediated translational attenuation. Cell Struct. Funct. 2013;38(2):183–194. doi: 10.1247/csf.13012.
9.Fatani BZ, Aldawod RA, Alhawaj FA. Schizophrenia: Etiology, pathophysiology and management: A review. Egypt. J. Hosp. Med. 2017;69(6):2640–2646.
10.Stroup TS, Gray N. Management of common adverse effects of antipsychotic medications. World Psychiatry. 2018;17:341–356. doi: 10.1002/wps.20567.
11.Casey DE. Pathophysiology of antipsychotic drug-induced movement disorders. J. Clin. Psychiatry. 2004;65:25–28.
12.Caroff SN, Hurford I, Lybrand J, Campbell EC. Movement disorders induced by antipsychotic drugs: Implications of the CATIE schizophrenia trial. Neurol. Clin. 2011;29:127–148. doi: 10.1016/j.ncl.2010.10.002.
13.Berger PA, Rexroth K. Tardive dyskinesia: Clinical, biological, and pharmacological perspectives. Schizophr Bull. 1980;6(1):102–116. doi: 10.1093/schbul/6.1.102.
14.Mahmoudi S, Lévesque D, Blanchet PJ. Upregulation of dopamine D3, not D2, receptors correlates with tardive dyskinesia in a primate model. Mov. Disord. 2014;29(9):1125–1133. doi: 10.1002/mds.25909.
15.Cornett EM, Novitch M, Kaye AD, Kata V, Kaye AM. Medication-induced tardive dyskinesia: A review and update. Ochsner J. 2017;17:162–174.
16.Turrone P, Remington G, Nobrega JN. The vacuous chewing movement (VCM) model of tardive dyskinesia revisited: Is there a relationship to dopamine D2 receptor occupancy? Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2002;26:361–380. doi: 10.1016/s0149-7634(02)00008-8.
17.Cho CH, Lee HJ. Oxidative stress and tardive dyskinesia: Pharmacogenetic evidence. Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry [Internet] 2013;46:207–213. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2012.10.018.
18.Lister J, Nobrega JN, Fletcher PJ, Remington G. Oxidative stress and the antipsychotic-induced vacuous chewing movement model of tardive dyskinesia: Evidence for antioxidant-based prevention strategies. Psychopharmacology. 2014;231:2237–2249. doi: 10.1007/s00213-014-3582-6.
19.Lerner PP, Miodownik C, Lerner V. Tardive dyskinesia (syndrome): Current concept and modern approaches to its management. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2015;69:321–334. doi: 10.1111/pcn.12270.
20.Kapur S, Seeman P. Does fast dissociation from the dopamine D2 receptor explain the action of atypical antipsychotics? A new hypothesis. Am. J. Psychiatry. 2001;158:360–369. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.3.360.
21.Nandra KS, Agius M. The differences between typical and atypical antipsychotics: The effects on neurogenesis. Psychiatr. Danubina. 2012;24(Suppl 1):95–99.
22.Miyamoto S, Miyake N, Jarskog LF, Fleischhacker WW, Lieberman JA. Pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia: A critical review of the pharmacology and clinical effects of current and future therapeutic agents. Mol. Psychiatry. 2012;17:1206–1227. doi: 10.1038/mp.2012.47.
23.Kane JM. Tardive dyskinesia rates with atypical antipsychotics in adults: Prevalence and incidence. J. Clin. Psychiatry. 2004;65:16–20.
24.Stegmayer K, Walther S, van Harten P. Tardive dyskinesia associated with atypical antipsychotics: Prevalence, mechanisms and management strategies. CNS Drugs. 2018;32:135–147. doi: 10.1007/s40263-018-0494-8.
25.Parikh V, Khan MM, Mahadik SP. Differential effects of antipsychotics on expression of antioxidant enzymes and membrane lipid peroxidation in rat brain. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2003;37(1):43–51. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3956(02)00048-1.
26.Kropp S, Kern V, Lange K, Degner D, Hajak G, Kornhuber J, Ruther E, Emrich H, et al. Oxidative stress during treatment with first- and second-generation antipsychotics. J. Neuropsychiatr. 2005;17(2):227–231. doi: 10.1176/jnp.17.2.227.
27.Noto C, Ota VK, Gadelha A, Noto MN, Barbosa DS, Bonifácio KL, et al. Oxidative stress in drug naïve first episode psychosis and antioxidant effects of risperidone. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2015;68:210–216. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2015.07.003.
28.Stojković T, Radonjić NV, Velimirović M, Jevtić G, Popović V, Doknić M, et al. Risperidone reverses phencyclidine induced decrease in glutathione levels and alterations of antioxidant defense in rat brain. Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry. 2012;39(1):192–199. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2012.06.013.
29.Wyatt RJ. Tardive dyskinesia: Possible involvement of free radicals and treatment with vitamin E. Schizophr. Bull. 1999;31:731–740. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a033414.
30.Teo JT, Edwards MJ, Bhatia K. Tardive dyskinesia is caused by maladaptive synaptic plasticity: A hypothesis. Mov. Disord. 2012;27(10):1205–1215. doi: 10.1002/mds.25107.
31.Zuardi AW. Cannabidiol: From an inactive cannabinoid to a drug with wide spectrum of action. Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria [Internet] 2008;30:271–280. doi: 10.1590/s1516-44462008000300015.
32.Caruso G, Grasso M, Fidilio A, Tascedda F, Drago F, Caraci F. Antioxidant properties of second-generation antipsychotics: Focus on microglia. Pharmaceuticals. 2020;13(12):1–20. doi: 10.3390/ph13120457.
33.Al-amin M, Choudhury FR, Chowdhury AS. Pretreatment with risperidone ameliorates systemic LPS-induced oxidative stress in the cortex and hippocampus. Front. Neurosci. 2018;12:384. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00384.
34.Eftekhari A, Ahmadian E, Azarmi Y, Parvizpur A, Hamishehkar H, Eghbal MA. In vitro/vivo studies towards mechanisms of risperidone-induced oxidative stress and the protective role of coenzyme Q10 and N-acetylcysteine. Toxicol. Mech. Methods. 2016;26(7):520–528. doi: 10.1080/15376516.2016.1204641.
35.Shah R, Subhan F, Sultan SM, Ali G. Short-term oral administration of risperidone induces pancreatic damage and hyperamylasemia in Sprague–Dawley rats. Braz. J. Pharm. Sci. 2018;54(4):e17841.
36.Kawabe K, Ueno SI. A case of acute pancreatitis associated with risperidone treatment. Clin. Psychopharmacol. Neurosci. 2014;12(1):67–68. doi: 10.9758/cpn.2014.12.1.67.
37.Shah R, Subhan F, Sultan SM, Ali G, Ullah I, Ullah S. Comparative evaluation of pancreatic histopathology of rats treated with olanzapine, risperidone and streptozocin. Braz. J. Pharm. Sci. 2018;54(3):e17579.
38.Aja PM, Izekwe FI, Famurewa AC, Ekpono EU, Nwite FE, Igwenyi IO, et al. Hesperidin protects against cadmium-induced pancreatitis by modulating insulin secretion, redox imbalance and iNOS/NF-ĸB signaling in rats. Life Sci. 2020;259:118268. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118268.
39.Choi S, Kim H. The remedial potential of lycopene in pancreatitis through regulation of autophagy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:5775. doi: 10.3390/ijms21165775.
40.Bansod S, Chilvery S, Saifi MA, Das TJ, Tag H, Godugu C. Borneol protects against cerulein-induced oxidative stress and inflammation in acute pancreatitis mice model. Environ. Toxicol. 2021;36(4):530–539. doi: 10.1002/tox.23058.
41.Miyazaki Y, Kawano H, Yoshida T, Miyamoto S, Hokamaki J, Nagayoshi Y, et al. Pancreatic B-cell function is altered by oxidative stress induced by acute hyperglycaemia. Diabet. Med. 2007;24(2):154–160. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02058.x.
42.Sakano D, Uefune F, Tokuma H, Sonoda Y, Matsuura K, Takeda N, et al. VMAT2 safeguards β-cells against dopamine cytotoxicity under high-fat diet-induced stress. Diabetes. 2020;69(11):2377–2391. doi: 10.2337/db20-0207.
43.Viudez-Martínez A, García-Gutiérrez MS, Medrano-Relinque J, Navarrón CM, Navarrete F, Manzanares J. Cannabidiol does not display drug abuse potential in mice behavior. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2019;40(3):358–364. doi: 10.1038/s41401-018-0032-8.
44.Navarrete F, García-Gutiérrez MS, Gasparyan A, Austrich-Olivares A, Manzanares J. Role of cannabidiol in the therapeutic intervention for substance use disorders. Front. Pharmacol. 2021;12:1–24. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.626010.
45.Valvassori SS, Elias G, De Souza B, Petronilho F, Dal-Pizzol F, Kapczinski F, et al. Effects of cannabidiol on amphetamine-induced oxidative stress generation in an animal model of mania. J. Psychopharmacol. 2011;25(2):274–279. doi: 10.1177/0269881109106925.
46.Burstein S. Cannabidiol (CBD) and its analogs: A review of their effects on inflammation. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2015;23:1377–1385. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2015.01.059.
47.Peres FF, Levin R, Suiama MA, Diana MC, Gouvêa DA, Almeida VVD, et al. Cannabidiol prevents motor and cognitive impairments induced by reserpine in rats. Front. Pharmacol. 2016;7:1–10. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2016.00343.
48.Kajero JA, Seedat S, Ohaeri J, Akindele A, Aina O. Investigation of the effects of cannabidiol on vacuous chewing movements, locomotion, oxidative stress and blood glucose in rats treated with oral haloperidol. World J. Biol. Psychiatry. 2020;21(8):612–626. doi: 10.1080/15622975.2020.1752934.
49.Machado Bergamaschi M, Helena Costa Queiroz R, Waldo Zuardi A, Alexandre S, Crippa J. Safety and side effects of cannabidiol, a Cannabis sativa constituent. Curr. Drug Saf. 2011;6(4):237–249. doi: 10.2174/157488611798280924.
50.Franco V, Perucca E. Pharmacological and therapeutic properties of cannabidiol for epilepsy. Drugs. 2019;79:1435–1454. doi: 10.1007/s40265-019-01171-4.
51.Huestis MA, Solimini R, Pichini S, Pacifici R, Carlier J, Busardò FP. Cannabidiol adverse effects and toxicity. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2019;17(10):974–989. doi: 10.2174/1570159X17666190603171901.
52.Moreira FA, Guimarães FS. Cannabidiol inhibits the hyperlocomotion induced by psychotomimetic drugs in mice. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2005;512(2–3):199–205. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2005.02.040.
53.Iffland K, Grotenhermen F. An update on safety and side effects of cannabidiol: A review of clinical data and relevant animal studies. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2017;2(1):139–154. doi: 10.1089/can.2016.0034.
54.National Research Council . Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. 8. The National Academies Press; 2011.
55.Marchese G, Bartholini F, Casu MA, Ruiu S, Casti P, Congeddu E, et al. Haloperidol versus risperidone on rat “early onset” vacuous chewing. Behav. Brain Res. 2004;149(1):9–16. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(03)00192-x.
56.Guimarães FS, Chiaretti TM, Graeff FG, Zuardi AW. Antianxiety effect of cannabidiol in the elevated plus-maze. Psychopharmacology. 1990;100(4):558–559. doi: 10.1007/BF02244012.
57.Adeneye AA, Agbaje EO, Olagunju JA. Metformin: An effective attenuator of risperidone-induced insulin resistance hyperglycemia and dyslipidemia in rats. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 2011;49(5):332–338.
58.Crowley JJ, Adkins DE, Pratt AL, Quackenbush CR, Van Den Oord EJ, Moy SS, et al. Antipsychotic-induced vacuous chewing movements and extrapyramidal side effects are highly heritable in mice. Pharmacogenomics J. 2012;12(2):147–155. doi: 10.1038/tpj.2010.82.
59.Pellow S, Chopin P, File SE, Briley M. Validation of open: Closed arm entries in an elevated plus-maze as a measure of anxiety in the rat. J. Neurosci. Methods. 1985;14(3):149–167. doi: 10.1016/0165-0270(85)90031-7.
60.Walsh RN, Cummins RA. The open-field test: A critical review. Psychol. Bull. 1976;83(3):482–504.
61.Eweka, A. & Om’Iniabohs, F. The effects of monosodium glutamate on the open field locomotor activities in adult Wistar rats. Internet J. Nutr Wellness6(2) (2012).
62.Ennaceur A, Delacour J. A new one-trial test for neurobiological studies of memory in rats. 1: Behavioral data. Behav. Brain Res. 1988;31(1):47–59. doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(88)90157-x.
63.Öztürk Y, Aydin S, Beis R, Başer KHC, Berberoǧlu H. Effects of Hypericum perforatum L. and Hypericum calycinum L. extracts on the central nervous system in mice. Phytomedicine. 1996;3(2):139–146. doi: 10.1016/S0944-7113(96)80027-4.
64.Buege JA, Aust SD. Microsomal lipid peroxidation. Methods Enzymol. 1978;52(C):302–310. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(78)52032-6.
65.Sedlak J, Lindsay RH. Estimation of total, protein-bound, and nonprotein sulfhydryl groups in tissue with Ellman’s reagent. Anal. Biochem. 1968;25(1):192–205. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(68)90092-4.
66.Sinha AK. Colorimetric assay of catalase. Anal. Biochem. 1972;47(2):389–394. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(72)90132-7.
67.Sun M, Zigman S. An improved spectrophotometric assay for superoxide dismutase based on epinephrine autoxidation. Anal. Biochem. 1978;90(1):81–89. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(78)90010-6.
68.Kedare SB, Singh RP. Genesis and development of DPPH method of antioxidant assay. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2011;48(4):412–422. doi: 10.1007/s13197-011-0251-1.
69.Allison DB, Mentore JL, Heo M, Chandler LP, Cappelleri JC, Infante MC, et al. Antipsychotic-induced weight gain: A comprehensive research synthesis. Am. J. Psychiatry. 1999;156(11):16686–21696. doi: 10.1176/ajp.156.11.1686.
70.Meyer JM. Novel antipsychotics and severe hyperlipidemia. J. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 2001;21(4):369–374. doi: 10.1097/00004714-200108000-00003.
71.Murashita M, Inoue T, Kusumi I, Nakagawa S, Itoh K, Tanaka T, et al. Glucose and lipid metabolism of long-term risperidone monotherapy in patients with schizophrenia. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2007;61(1):54–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2007.01610.x.
72.Smith RC, Rachakonda S, Dwivedi S, Davis JM. Olanzapine and risperidone effects on appetite and ghrelin in chronic schizophrenic patients. Psychiatry Res. [Internet] 2012;199(3):159–163. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.03.011.
73.Reynolds GP, Kirk SL. Metabolic side effects of antipsychotic drug treatment—Pharmacological mechanisms. Pharmacol. Ther. [Internet] 2010;125(1):169–179. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2009.10.010.
74.Ignatowska-Jankowska B, Jankowski MM, Swiergiel AH. Cannabidiol decreases body weight gain in rats: Involvement of CB2 receptors. Neurosci. Lett. [Internet] 2011;490(1):82–84. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.12.031.
75.Osborne AL, Solowij N, Weston-Green K. A systematic review of the effect of cannabidiol on cognitive function: Relevance to schizophrenia. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. [Internet] 2017;72:310–324. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.11.012.
76.Carvalho RK, Souza MR, Santos ML, Guimarães FS, Pobbe RLH, Andersen ML, et al. Chronic cannabidiol exposure promotes functional impairment in sexual behavior and fertility of male mice. Reprod. Toxicol. 2018;81:34–40. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2018.06.013.
77.Weiss L, Zeira M, Reich S, Har-Noy M, Mechoulam R, Slavin S, et al. Cannabidiol lowers incidence of diabetes in non-obese diabetic mice. Autoimmunity. 2006;39:143–151. doi: 10.1080/08916930500356674.
78.Horvth B, Mukhopadhyay P, Hask G, Pacher P. The endocannabinoid system and plant-derived cannabinoids in diabetes and diabetic complications. Am. J. Pathol. [Internet] 2012;180(2):432–442. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.11.003.
79.Chaves YC, Genaro K, Stern CA, de Oliveira GG, de Souza Crippa JA, da Cunha JM, et al. Two-weeks treatment with cannabidiol improves biophysical and behavioral deficits associated with experimental type-1 diabetes. Neurosci. Lett. [Internet] 2020;729:135020. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2020.135020.
80.Bouwens L. Beta cell regeneration. Curr. Diabetes Rev. 2006;2(1):3–9. doi: 10.2174/157339906775473644.
81.Brunt TM, Van Genugten M, Höner-Snoeken K, Van De Velde MJ, Niesink RJM. Therapeutic satisfaction and subjective effects of different strains of pharmaceutical-grade cannabis. J. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 2014;34(3):344–349. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000000129.
82.Hoffman DC, Donovan H. Catalepsy as a rodent model for detecting antipsychotic drugs with extrapyramidal side effect liability. Psychopharmacology. 1995;120(2):128–133. doi: 10.1007/BF02246184.
83.Fink-Jensena A, Schmidt LS, Dencker D, Schülein C, Wess J, Wörtwein G, Woldbye DPD. Antipsychotic-induced catalepsy is attenuated in mice lacking the M4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2011;23(1):39–44. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2011.01.018.
84.Russo EB, Burnett A, Hall B, Parker KK. Agonistic properties of cannabidiol at 5-HT1a receptors. Neurochem. Res. 2005;30(8):1037–1043. doi: 10.1007/s11064-005-6978-1.
85.Nah SY, Saya D, Vogel Z. Cannabinoids inhibit agonist-stimulated formation of inositol phosphates in rat hippocampal cultures. Eur. J. Pharmacol. Mol. Pharmacol. 1993;246(1):19–24. doi: 10.1016/0922-4106(93)90004-s.
86.Zuardi AW, Shirakawa I, Finkelfarb E, Karniol IG. Action of cannabidiol on the anxiety and other effects produced by delta 9-THC in normal subjects. Psychopharmacology. 1982;76(3):245–250. doi: 10.1007/BF00432554.
87.Rogóz Z, Skuza G. Anxiolytic-like effects of olanzapine, risperidone and fluoxetine in the elevated plus-maze test in rats. Pharmacol. Rep. 2011;63(6):1547–1552. doi: 10.1016/s1734-1140(11)70719-8.
88.Knable MB, Heinz A, Raedler T, Weinberger DR. Extrapyramidal side effects with risperidone and haloperidol at comparable D2 receptor occupancy levels. Psychiatry Res. Neuroimaging. 1997;75(2):91–101. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4927(97)00023-1.
89.Désaméricq, G., Schurhoff, F., Meary, A., Szöke, A., Macquin-Mavier, I., Bachoud-Lévi, A. C. et al. Long-term neurocognitive effects of antipsychotics in schizophrenia: A network meta-analysis. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. [Internet] 70, 127–134 (2014). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK169259/.
90.Bhabak KP, Mugesh G. Functional mimics of glutathione peroxidase: Bioinspired synthetic antioxidants. Acc. Chem. Res. 2010;43(11):1408–1419. doi: 10.1021/ar100059g.
91.He J, Kong J, Tan QR, Li XM. Neuroprotective effect of atypical antipsychotics in cognitive and non-cognitive behavioral impairment in animal models. Cell Adhes. Migr. 2009 doi: 10.4161/cam.3.1.7401.
92.Dakhale G, Khanzode S, Khanzode S, Saoji A, Khobragade L, Turankar A. Oxidative damage and schizophrenia: The potential benefit by atypical antipsychotics. Neuropsychobiology. 2004;49(4):205–209. doi: 10.1159/000077368.
93.Kunz M, Gama CS, Andreazza AC, Salvador M, Ceresér KM, Gomes FA, et al. Elevated serum superoxide dismutase and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances in different phases of bipolar disorder and in schizophrenia. Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry. 2008;32(7):1677–1681. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2008.07.001.
94.Zendulka O, Dovrtělová G, Nosková K, Turjap M, Šulcová A, Hanuš L, et al. Cannabinoids and cytochrome P450 interactions. Curr. Drug Metab. 2016;17(3):206–226. doi: 10.2174/1389200217666151210142051.
95.Kudo S, Ishizaki T. Pharmacokinetics of haloperidol. An update. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 1999;37:435–456. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199937060-00001.
96.Padurariu M, Ciobica A, Dobrin I, Stefanescu C. Evaluation of antioxidant enzymes activities and lipid peroxidation in schizophrenic patients treated with typical and atypical antipsychotics. Neurosci. Lett. [Internet] 2010;479(3):317–320. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.05.088.
97.Esposito G, De Filippis D, Maiuri MC, De Stefano D, Carnuccio R, Iuvone T. Cannabidiol inhibits inducible nitric oxide synthase protein expression and nitric oxide production in beta-amyloid stimulated PC12 neurons through p38 MAP kinase and NF-kappaB involvement. Neurosci. Lett. 2006;399(1–2):91–95. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.01.047.
98.Esposito G, Scuderi C, Savani C, Steardo L, De Filippis D, Cottone P, et al. Cannabidiol in vivo blunts β-amyloid induced neuroinflammation by suppressing IL-1β and iNOS expression. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2007;151(8):1272–1279. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707337.
99.Kato T, Monji A, Hashioka S, Kanba S. Risperidone significantly inhibits interferon-γ-induced microglial activation in vitro. Schizophr. Res. 2007;92(1–3):10815. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2007.01.019.
100.Levkovitz Y, Mendlovich S, Riwkes S, Braw Y, Levkovitch-Verbin H, Gal G, et al. A double-blind, randomized study of minocycline for the treatment of negative and cognitive symptoms in early-phase schizophrenia. J. Clin. Psychiatry. 2010;71(2):138–149. doi: 10.4088/JCP.08m04666yel.
101.MacDowell KS, García-Bueno B, Madrigal JLM, Parellada M, Arango C, Micó JA, et al. Risperidone normalizes increased inflammatory parameters and restores anti-inflammatory pathways in a model of neuroinflammation. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013;16(1):121–135. doi: 10.1017/S1461145711001775.
102.Chen J, Hou C, Chen X, Wang D, Yang P, He X, et al. Protective effect of cannabidiol on hydrogen peroxide-induced apoptosis, inflammation and oxidative stress in nucleus pulposus cells. Mol. Med. Rep. 2016;14(3):2321–2327. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2016.5513.
103.Tarazi FI, Zhang K, Baldessarini RJ. Long-term effects of newer antipsychotic drugs on neuronal nitric oxide synthase in rat brain. Nitric Oxide Biol. Chem. 2002;7(4):297–300. doi: 10.1016/s1089-8603(02)00126-x.
104.Suzuki E, Nakaki T, Shintani F, Kanba S, Miyaoka H. Antipsychotic, antidepressant, anxiolytic, and anticonvulsant drugs induce type II nitric oxide synthase mRNA in rat brain. Neurosci. Lett. 2002;333(3):217–219. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(02)01035-2.
105.Taneli F, Pirildar Ş, Akdeniz F, Uyanik BS, Ari Z. Serum nitric oxide metabolite levels and the effect of antipsychotic therapy in schizophrenia. Arch. Med. Res. 2004;35(5):401–405. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2004.06.002.
106.Da Cruz Jung IE, Machado AK, Da Cruz IBM, Barbisan F, Azzolin VF, Duarte T, et al. Haloperidol and Risperidone at high concentrations activate an in vitro inflammatory response of RAW 264.7 macrophage cells by induction of apoptosis and modification of cytokine levels. Psychopharmacology. 2016;233(9):1715–1723. doi: 10.1007/s00213-015-4079-7.
107.Liskowsky DR, Potter LT. Dopamine D2 receptors in the striatum and frontal cortex following chronic administration of haloperidol. Neuropharmacology. 1987;26(5):481–483. doi: 10.1016/0028-3908(87)90031-1.
108.Kusumi I, Takahashi Y, Suzuki K, Kameda K, Koyama T. Differential effects of subchronic treatments with atypical antipsychotic drugs on dopamine D2 and serotonin 5-HT2A receptors in the rat brain. J. Neural Transm. (Vienna) 2000;107(3):295–302. doi: 10.1007/s007020050024.
109.Brinholi FF, de Farias CC, Bonifácio KL, Higachi L, Casagrande R, Moreira EG, et al. Clozapine and olanzapine are better antioxidants than haloperidol, quetiapine, risperidone and ziprasidone in in vitro models. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2016;81:411–415. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2016.02.047.
110.Martin WF, Correll CU, Weiden PJ, Jiang Y, Pathak S, Di Petrillo L, et al. Mitigation of olanzapine-induced weight gain with samidorphan, an opioid antagonist: A randomized double-blind phase 2 study in patients with schizophrenia. Am. J. Psychiatry. 2019;176(6):457–467. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.18030280.
111.Bishnoi M, Boparai RK. An animal model to study the molecular basis of tardive dyskinesia. Methods Mol. Biol. 2012;829:193–201. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-458-2_12.

Studies

Conditions

Cannabinoids and active compounds

Related research

Abstract

Untitled section

Article notes

Untitled section

Author notes

Introduction

Materials and methods

Animals

Drugs

Experimental design

Behavioural assays

Elevated plus-maze test

Open-field test

Object recognition test

Rota-rod test

Antioxidant indices assays

Malondialdehyde (MDA)

Reduced glutathione (GSH)

Catalase (CAT)

Superoxide dismutase (SOD)

Nitric oxide (NO) scavenging activity

DPPH scavenging assay

Statistical analysis

Statement on reporting experimental procedures

Ethical statement

Results

Effects of interventions on fasting blood sugar (FBS) and weight gain

Behavioural assays after the last dose of pharmacological interventions

VCM

Calculated open arm

Discrimination index

Line crossing

Rota rod

Brain oxidative stress parameters

Brain GSH

Brain SOD

Brain CAT

Brain DPPH

Brain NO

Brain MDA

Discussion

Effects of interventions on oxidative stress indices in the brain

Limitations

Conclusion

Acknowledgements

Author contributions

Funding

Competing interests

Footnotes

Footnote Group

References

Untitled section

References

Additional materials