Description of correction: The ACS Omega editorial team made some typographical errors in the units of the AFM scans, which jeopardize the logic. For instance, changing micrometre (μm) to millimeter (mm).

The mistakes made by the journal editorial team are pointed out below:

• 1.Page 61437, lines 251–252: Three different areas on three different fibers were imaged, and scan sizes at 5, 10, 20, and 30 mm were collected.
• 2.Page 61440, Figure 3 caption: AFM (10 mm × 10 μm)
• 3.Page 61441, lines 495–496: Supporting Information (Figures S1–S3) determined for a 10 nm section in the AFM scan.
• 4.Page 61441, lines 540–541: time of 30 min produced a surface roughness of 182 nm for a 10 mm  × 10 mm scan

We would like to make the following corrections in the units, as all AFM scans were done in μm:

• 1.Page 61437, lines 251–252: Three different areas on three different fibers were imaged, and scan sizes at 5, 10, 20, and 30 μm mm were collected.
• 2.Page 61440, Figure 3 caption: AFM (10 μm mm × 10 μm)
• 3.Page 61441, lines 495–496: Supporting Information (Figures S1–S3) determined for a 10 μm nm section in the AFM scan.
• 4.Page 61441, lines 540–541: time of 30 min produced a surface roughness of 182 nm for a 10 μm mm  × 10 μm mm scan