Cannabinomics: Application of Metabolomics in Cannabis (Cannabis sativa L.) Research and Development
1Laboratory of Pesticide Science, Agricultural University of Athens, Athens, Greece
2Department of Plant Science, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
3The Green Organic Dutchman, Mississauga, ON, Canada
*Correspondence: Konstantinos A. Aliferis, konstantinos.aliferis@aua.gr; konstantinos.aliferis@mcgill.caAbstract
Cannabis (Cannabis sativa L.) is a complex, polymorphic plant species, which produces a vast array of bioactive metabolites, the two major chemical groups being cannabinoids and terpenoids. Nonetheless, the psychoactive cannabinoid tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) and the non-psychoactive cannabidiol (CBD), are the two major cannabinoids that have monopolized the research interest. Currently, more than 600 Cannabis varieties are commercially available, providing access to a multitude of potent extracts with complex compositions, whose genetics are largely inconclusive. Recently introduced legislation on Cannabis cultivation in many countries represents a great opportunity, but at the same time, a great challenge for Cannabis research and development (R&D) toward applications in the pharmaceutical, food, cosmetics, and agrochemical industries. Based on its versatility and unique capabilities in the deconvolution of the metabolite composition of complex matrices, metabolomics represents an ideal bioanalytical tool that could greatly assist and accelerate Cannabis R&D. Among others, Cannabis metabolomics or cannabinomics can be applied in the taxonomy of Cannabis varieties in chemovars, the research on the discovery and assessment of new Cannabis-based sources of bioactivity in medicine, the development of new food products, and the optimization of its cultivation, aiming for improvements in yield and potency. Although Cannabis research is still in its infancy, it is highly foreseen that the employment of advanced metabolomics will provide insights that could assist the sector to face the aforementioned challenges. Within this context, here, the current state-of-the-art and conceptual aspects of cannabinomics are presented.
Introduction
Cannabis (Cannabis sativa L., Cannabaceae) (Figure 1) is a highly variable, complex, polymorphic plant species, which originates from Eurasia (Russo et al., 2008; Clarke and Merlin, 2013, 2016). Currently, it is distributed world-wide and grows in variable habitats, altitudes, and soil and climate conditions (Clarke and Merlin, 2016). There is a controversy among botanical taxonomists on the number of species that compose the Cannabis genus; presently, there is a consensus on the nomenclature proposed by Small and Cronquist (Small and Cronquist, 1976); C. sativa is monotypic, composed of two sub-species (subsp.), namely sativa and indica, based on their Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) content. The former is further sub-divided into two varieties (var.), sativa (low Δ9-THC, domestication traits) and spontanea (low Δ9-THC, wild-type traits), and the latter into var. indica (high THC, domestication traits) and var. kafiristanica (high Δ9-THC, wild-type traits). Approximately 600 Cannabis varieties are commercially available (Rahn et al., 2016), whose genetics, for many of these, are only partially known. The plant has a diploid genome (2n = 20) composed of nine autosomes and a pair of sex chromosomes (X and Y) (Ming et al., 2011) and its draft genome has recently been sequenced (Van Bakel et al., 2011).
The use and exploitation of Cannabis has sparked controversy, however, the recent legalization of its use for medical and other purposes in many countries within the corresponding legislative framework (Pacula and Smart, 2017; Cox, 2018), in combination with the remarkable bioactivities of the plant, pose an urge for the acceleration and intensification of Cannabis research and development (R&D). Although it is still in its infancy, there is currently an exponentially increasing interest in Cannabis R&D, as it is confirmed by the number of relative publications and citations (Figure 2).
Nevertheless, drug discovery, the risk assessment of cannabis products and their quality control (QC), and the research on the plant and its bioactive constituents, necessitate the implementation of advanced bioanalytical tools. Such tools could facilitate the acquisition of the necessary missing knowledge that will be further exploited toward the development of innovative, safe products, and the improvement of the plant’s productivity in a timely fashion. Based on its versatility and unique capabilities in the deconvolution of the metabolite composition of complex matrices, metabolomics represents an ideal bioanalytical tool that could greatly accelerate Cannabis R&D. Its successful implementation requires solid expertise in experimental design, analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, advanced statistics, and bioinformatics. To date, metabolomics has been developed for a wide range applications in various fields such as plant (Sumner et al., 2015) and food science (Wishart, 2008; Cevallos-Cevallos et al., 2009; Herrero et al., 2012; Castro-Puyana and Herrero, 2013), medicine (Wishart, 2016), toxicology (Bonvallot et al., 2018; Viant et al., 2019), environmental sciences (Bundy et al., 2009), and plant protection products (PPPs) R&D (Aliferis and Chrysayi-Tokousbalides, 2011; Aliferis and Jabaji, 2011). Nonetheless, since comprehensive reviews on the topics of metabolomics methodologies, analytical platforms, software, and cannabinoid analysis have been recently published (Madsen et al., 2010; Aliferis and Chrysayi-Tokousbalides, 2011; Fuhrer and Zamboni, 2015; Gromski et al., 2015; Markley et al., 2017; Leghissa et al., 2018b; Pellati et al., 2018; Ramirez et al., 2019; Atapattu and Johnson, 2020), these topics are not reviewed here.
For the application of metabolomics in Cannabis R&D we are introducing the term “Cannabinomics” (Table 1). Its application could greatly assist the sector via the mapping of the metabolomes of the existing genotypes and their classification into the corresponding chemovars (Hazekamp et al., 2016; Lewis et al., 2018). Additionally, it has been predicted that the contribution of Cannabinomics toward the optimization and standardization of agricultural practices [e.g., application of plant growth regulators (PGR), bioelicitors, fertilizers, light conditions, irrigation events] for the production of superior quality products will be substantial (Magagnini et al., 2018). Similarly, it is expected to have a significant impact in the drug discovery, medicine, food science, functional cosmetics research, and metabolic engineering of microorganisms for the biosynthesis of cannabinoids. Here, the current state-of-the-art on these research topics, as well as conceptual aspects and perspectives, are being presented.
| Analytical methoda | Extraction solventsb | Purpose of the study | References |
| 1H NMR | MeOH:H2O (1:1, v/v) or CHCl3-d, evaporation, dissolution in CHCl3-d or MeOH-d4:H2O-d2 | Effect of jasmonic acid (JA) and pectin on Cannabis cell lines | Peč et al., 2010 |
| 1H NMR (1D DOSY) 1H NMR | H2O and H2O:EtOH extracts, evaporation, dissolution in CHCl3-d, MeOH-d4, or H2O-d2 | Discovery of the differences among cultivars and study of the effects of temperature and solvent polarity on the cannabinoid content of extracts | Politi et al., 2008 |
| 1H NMR, 1H-1H COSY, 1H-13C HMBC | CHCl3-MeOH:H2O, evaporation of the extracts and finally dissolution in CHCl3-d or MeOH-d4:KH2PO4 | Classification and analyses of C. sativa L. plants and cell suspension cultures | Flores-Sanchez et al., 2012 |
| 1H NMR | H2O-d2, CHCl3-d | Cannabinoids biosynthesis and metabolite profiles of trichomes during flowering | Happyana and Kayser, 2013 |
| 1H NMR LC/DAD | DMSO-d6 MeOH, MeOH:H2O | Discrimination among chemovars based on the cannabinoid and phenolic contents | Peschel and Politi, 2015 |
| GC/FID | CHCl3, followed by Ace | Discrimination between C. sativa var sativa and C. sativa var indica based on the terpenoid profiles of essential oils | Hillig, 2004 |
| GC/FID | EtOH | Chemotaxonomy of Cannabis strains based on their terpenoid and cannabinoid profiles | Fischedick et al., 2010 |
| GC/FID | EtOH | Chemotaxonomy of Cannabis flower samples and extracts | Elzinga et al., 2015 |
| GC/FID | EtOH | Chemotaxonomy of Cannabis strains based on their terpenoid and cannabinoid profiles | Hazekamp and Fischedick, 2012 |
| GC/FID | EtOH | Chemotaxonomy of Cannabis strains based on their terpenoid and cannabinoid profiles | Hazekamp et al., 2016 |
| GC/FID | MeOH | Chemotaxonomy of Cannabis strains based on their terpenoid profile | Fischedick, 2017 |
| GC/FID, LC-DAD | EtOH | Method validation for the detection of cannabinoids and terpenoids | Giese et al., 2015 |
| GC/FID, LC-DAD | MTBE | Chemotaxonomy of Cannabis strains based on their terpenoid and cannabinoid profiles | Zager et al., 2019 |
| GC/MS | CHCl3, followed by evaporation of the extracts, and addition of Ace | Chemotaxonomy of Cannabis strains based on their Δ9-THC to CBD ratio | Hillig and Mahlberg, 2004 |
| GC/MS | MeOH (80%, v/v) | Chemotaxonomy of Cannabis strains | Mudge et al., 2019 |
| LC/ESI/MS | deionized H2O, followed by addition of ACN:MeOH 70:30 (v/v) (formic acid 0.1%, v/v), removal of phospholipids, drying, and dissolution in ammonium acetate (2.0 mM):ACN (70:30, v/v) solution | Study of pharmacokinetics of major cannabinoids in rat brains | Citti et al., 2018 |
| LC/TOF/MS-LC/QTOF/MS | EtAc (formic acid 0.05% v/v). | Study and optimization of the biosynthesis of natural cannabinoids or synthetic analogs by metabolic engineered yeast strains | Luo et al., 2019 |
| HRMS (Orbitrap MS) | MeOH | Chemotaxonomy of Cannabis strains and assessment of the quality of Cannabis products | Wang et al., 2018 |
| LC/QQQ/MS NMR | MeOH, followed by dilution in H2O/MeOH (2/1, v/v) (0.1% formic acid) CHCl3-d | Analyses of plant’s trichomes | Happyana et al., 2013 |
Conclusion
Cannabis is a species whose exploitation for applications in various fields has sparked great controversy. Nonetheless, there is a consensus that from a scientific perspective, the research on the plant could lead to significant advances for applications of extracts or individual metabolites in medicine, cosmetics, and the food industry. Currently, the recently introduced legislation on Cannabis in many countries around the world has enabled research on the plant and the vast array of its products. Cannabis matrices are extremely complex, requiring the implementation of advanced bioanalytical tools in order to gain meaningful insights into their bioactivity, medicinal properties, and risk assessment.
Based on its unique capacities and the developments in bioanalytics, is expected that metabolomics will greatly assist in impending Cannabis R&D contributing to the development of new, superior, efficient, and safe for the consumer, products. As a functional genomics tool, metabolomics could be ideally employed in the monitoring of cannabinoid and terpenoid profiles and their alterations in response to genotypic changes or agricultural treatments (e.g., fertilizers, bioelicitors, environmental conditions) and also in the biomarker-assisted selection of chemovars.
Additionally, the monitoring and comprehensive mapping of terpenoids could greatly assist the efforts toward understanding their synergy with cannabinoids. The modulation of the potency and medicinal properties of Cannabis extracts by their terpenoid content is largely unexplored. The acquisition of information on the effect of terpenoids on the medicinal properties of extracts could accelerate the discovery of novel drugs. The multistep engineering of the terpenoid biosynthetic pathway (Aharoni et al., 2005) and the generation of plants with knock-out mutations via technologies such as the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats CRISPR (Ran et al., 2013) is feasible (Russo, 2018), and represents a great opportunity. Nonetheless, caution is required in applications of Cannabis for commercial purposes, which is expected to spark great controversy and face many regulatory hurdles.
Moreover, metabolomics is an invaluable tool that can be employed in the high-throughput chemotaxonomy or chemotyping of Cannabis strains into the corresponding chemovars based on their cannabinoid, terpenoid, and/or global metabolite profiles. Such classification is important not only for research but also for QC purposes. The correlation between Cannabis chemovars, their chemical composition, and their medicinal properties, is highly expected to accelerate drug discovery and development. From the current evidence, it is apparent that further experimentation is required for the development of Cannabis preparations or individual metabolites as drugs based on clinical trials (Soltesz et al., 2015), for which metabolomics should be an integrated component. Additionally, the employment and integration of advanced analyzers applying metabolomics is strongly expected to provide novel insights toward the understanding of the cannabinoid pharmacokinetics.
The comprehensive study of the effect of light on Cannabis metabolism and metabolite profiles could greatly contribute to the deconvolution of the underlying operating mechanisms that regulate the responses of plants to the various light regimes and their potency. This is expected to add a critical mass of information that could be exploited in the optimization of the light conditions in order to regulate its development toward the achievement of, among others, higher yields, improved and customized potency, and early flowering. Furthermore, the research on the scaling-up of the production of rare cannabinoids, cannabis-derived bioactives, or their synthetic analogs through the metabolic engineering of microorganisms, could be substantially accelerated through the application of metabolomics.
Nonetheless, there is a need for further optimization and validation of the available bioanalytical protocols that could be implemented in the routine analyses of Cannabis matrices for QC but also for R&D purposes. The robustness of the GC-based platforms, which are the golden standard for metabolomics, faces the challenge of the heat-catalyzed conversions of several cannabinoids, which can be addressed by appropriate silylation protocols. Based on the limitations of the available instrumentation, there is not a single analyzer that could cover the remarkably diverse Cannabis metabolome. Additionally, the development of Cannabis-specific bioinformatics software and corresponding metabolite databases, would greatly contribute toward the development of metabolomics applications-Canabinomics in Cannabis-related research disciplines. To the best of our knowledge, the current is the first overview of the application of metabolomics in Cannabis R&D, which following the legalization of medicinal Cannabis, is highly foreseen to greatly assist Cannabis breeding and selection, being an unparalleled tool to link genotypes with phenotypes and potency, and predict traits based on modeling and machine learning.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The handling Editor declared a shared affiliation, though no other collaboration with one of the authors KA.
Acknowledgements
We thank Ms. Hayley Clark for the editorial review of the manuscript.
Abbreviations
- Δ9-THC
- Δ 9-tetrahydrocannabinol
- CB1, CB2
- cannabinoid receptors CB1 CB2
- CBD
- cannabidiol
- GC/FID
- gas chromatography-flame ionization detector platform
- HRMS
- high-resolution mass spectrometry
- LC-DAD
- liquid chromatography-diode array detector platform
- MoA
- mode(s)-of-action
- NMR spectroscopy
- nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy
- PPPs
- plant protection products
- QC
- quality control
- R&D
- research and development.