Host origin of microbiota drives functional recovery and Clostridioides difficile clearance in mice
Department of Biological Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
*Corresponding author: Contact information: Anna M. Seekatz, PhD, aDepartment of Biological Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA, aseekat@clemson.eduAbstract
Colonization resistance provided by the gut microbiota is essential for resisting both initial Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) and potential recurrent infection (rCDI). Although fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been successful in treating rCDI by restoring microbial composition and function, mechanisms underlying efficacy of standardized stool-derived products remain poorly understood. Using a combination of 16S rRNA gene-based and metagenomic sequencing alongside metabolomics, we investigated microbiome recovery following FMT from human and murine donor sources in a mouse model of rCDI. We found that a human-derived microbiota was less effective in clearing C. difficile compared to a mouse-derived microbiota, despite successful microbial engraftment and recovery of bacterial functional potential. Metabolomic analysis revealed deficits in secondary metabolites, suggesting a functional remodeling between human microbes in their new host environment. Collectively, our data revealed additional environmental, ecological, or host factors involved in FMT-based recovery from rCDI.
Importance
Clostridioides difficile is a significant healthcare-associated pathogen, with recurrent infections presenting a major treatment challenge due to further disruption of the microbiota after antibiotic administration. Despite the success of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for the treatment of recurrent infection, the mechanisms mediating its efficacy remain largely underexplored. This study reveals that effectiveness of FMT may be compromised by a mismatch between donor microbes and the recipient environment, leading to deficits in key microbial metabolites. These findings highlight additional factors to consider when assessing the efficacy of microbial-based therapeutics for CDI and other conditions.
Article notes
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Footnote Group
Introduction
Colonization resistance against the healthcare-associated pathogen, Clostridioides difficile, is predominantly mediated by the indigenous microbes in our gastrointestinal tract, termed the gut microbiota (1). A diverse gut microbiota typically helps prevent initial colonization and disease if an individual encounters C. difficile spores from the environment (2, 3). However, disruptions to this ecosystem, such as following antibiotic treatment (4–7), can create conditions conducive to C. difficile spore germination, outgrowth, and toxin production, leading to C. difficile infection (CDI) (8, 9).
Given the crucial role of the microbiota in preventing CDI, there is significant interest in developing alternatives to standard antibiotic therapies directed against C. difficile, which can further disrupt the microbiota and heighten the risk of recurrent CDI (rCDI) (10, 11). Antibiotics that specifically target C. difficile while preserving the gut microbiota show promise in reducing rCDI rates (12, 13). Advances in treating rCDI have been demonstrated by the success of microbial-based therapeutics, notably fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), which involves transferring stool from a healthy donor to a diseased individual to restore the recipient’s microbiota (14). In 2023, the FDA approved two standardized stool-derived products for rCDI treatment (15, 16). While these products have mitigated some safety concerns associated with using minimally processed stool, they remain non-specific and still carry safety and efficacy concerns (17–19). Despite the extensive research demonstrating potential mechanisms by which gut microbes inhibit C. difficile (20–24), single probiotic or targeted microbial formulations do not always achieve the success rates of FMT or stool-derived products (25, 26). Consequently, a significant gap in knowledge remains regarding the specific factors and interactions that determine long-term stability and success of the transplanted microbiota.
Both engraftment of specific microbial species and restoration of overall microbial diversity is correlated with successful FMT outcomes (27–30). Mechanistically, these species are hypothesized to reconstitute bacterial functions that inhibit C. difficile. One key microbial function associated with FMT success is the transformation of primary bile acids in the gut, which is exclusively performed by microbes and is known to inhibit vegetative growth of C. difficile (20, 31, 32). Additionally, the levels of the bacterial fermentation products, such as the short chain fatty acid (SCFA) butyrate, have been positively correlated with successful FMT outcomes in both mouse studies and patients with rCDI (33, 34). In addition to microbial-derived metabolites, recent studies have also emphasized the importance of bacterial nutrient exclusion in limiting C. difficile colonization (35–38). C. difficile is auxotrophic for several amino acids, such as proline (39, 40), and can ferment amino acids, which are more abundant in a gut with reduced bacterial diversity (5). Transplanting a microbiota capable of competing with C. difficile for these nutrients likely plays a crucial role in successful clearance. The host environment may also play a role in FMT success in addition to microbial functional restoration. For instance, the host immune response has been observed to influence the ability of FMT to clear C. difficile in mice (41). Increased inflammation can also change C. difficile metabolism and virulence (42), as well as microbiota interactions (22, 43), that could influence FMT outcome. Understanding these additional interactions when transplanting microbial communities between hosts is thus a critical consideration for therapeutics relying on microbiota manipulation, particularly for conditions beyond C. difficile where success rates are not as high (44, 45).
This study aimed to identify functions important for clearing C. difficile in the gut. However, our results also highlighted additional factors to consider when translating microbial community structure into functional outcomes, particularly in the context of host-microbe adaptation in the gut. Using a mouse model of rCDI, we observed that compared to a mouse-derived microbial community, a diverse human-derived microbial community was unable to clear C. difficile. Independent of their ability to clear C. difficile, both fecal products demonstrated engraftment of microbes typically associated with successful FMT outcome. Metagenomic sequencing also demonstrated recovery of bacterial genetic functions important for C. difficile clearance, suggesting recovery of functional potential, independent of C. difficile clearance. In contrast, both untargeted and targeted metabolomics demonstrated deficits in many secondary metabolites, in line with previous metabolomic comparisons before and after FMT. Collectively, these results suggest human microbes, when transplanted into a mouse with an altered murine microbiome, are unable to realize their functional potential in this new host environment. These results underscore the need to consider not only the functional potential of a microbial-derived therapeutic, but how to ensure that these functions manifest in a treated patient.
Methods
Ethics Statement
All animal protocols were approved by the University of Michigan Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (protocol # PRO00008114), which adhere to the Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals guidelines. Informed consent was obtained from individuals prior to fecal donation using protocols approved by the University of Michigan Institutional Review Board (#HUM00130242, #HUM00098164).
Mouse model of recurrent CDI
All experiments used 5 – 8 week-old C57BL/6 male and female mice from an established breeding colony at the University of Michigan, originally sourced from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME). Animal housing was conducted in specific-pathogen-free and biohazard (autoclave-in / autoclave-out) conditions, received autoclaved food, water, and bedding in a 12-hour light/dark cycle. A laminar flow hood with personal protective equipment and the use of the sporicidal disinfectant Perisept (Triple S, Navigator #62, Los Angeles, CA) was used for all cage changes, infections, and sample collections. Mice were housed in groups of 3 – 5 animals per cage, ensuring multiple cages per group. Results represent eight sets of experiments, with cage assignments and experimental groups detailed in Table S1.
A previously described CDI recurrence model was used for all experiments (46). Mice (n = 129) were administered 0.5 mg / ml of cefoperazone (MP Biochemicals, #199695) in sterile drinking water (Gibco, #15230) for 5 days. At day 0, mice received 103 spores of C. difficile strain 630 (ATCC BAA-1382) in 20 μl sterile PBS (Gibco, #10010) via oral gavage, generated as previously described (47). Mice were given 0.4 mg/ml vancomycin (Sigma, #V2002; #V8138) in drinking water days 4 – 9. At day 11, mice were left untreated (‘noFMT’; n = 24) or administered a 100 μl fecal preparation via oral gavage from one of the following sources: feces from healthy, untreated, age-matched animals from the same breeding colony (‘mFMT’; n = 33), feces from healthy, untreated animals from other breeding colonies (‘mFMT-other’; n = 23), or feces from one of six human donors (‘hFMT’; n = 53). Detailed preparation protocols and donor sources are further described in Supplemental Methods. Mice were monitored daily for clinical signs of CDI and weight loss, with indicated fecal samples collected directly from mice throughout the experiment and cecal content collected at euthanization at early (day 21) or late (day 42) timepoints.
Fecal and cecal samples were enumerated in an anaerobic chamber (Coy Laboratory Products, Grass Lake, MI) for C. difficile via colony-forming units (CFUs) (46). Briefly, samples were homogenized in pre-reduced PBS in a 1:10 ratio based on sample weight, and serially diluted to 10-6. Multiple 100 μl dilutions were plated onto taurocholate cycloserine cefoxitin fructose agar (TCCFA) plates (48) for overnight incubation prior to CFU enumeration.
DNA extraction, library preparations, and sequencing
DNA was extracted with the MO Bio PowerFecal kit (now PowerFecalDNA, Qiagen, Hilden Germany), adapted to the epMotion 5075 TMX (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). The UMICH Microbiome Core conducted all DNA library preparation and 16S rRNA gene-based sequencing (46), as developed by Kozich et al (48). Briefly, the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was PCR-amplified using barcoded dual-index primers. Upon confirmation of a correctly sized PCR product using gel electrophoresis (Invitrogen, #G401002), PCR products were normalized using the SequelPrep plate kit (Life Technologies, #A10510-01) and pooled per 96-well plate. Each pool was quantified using qPCR (KapaBiosystems, #KK4854) and sized using the Agilent Bioanalyzer high-sensitivity DNA kit (Agilent, #5067-4642). The Illumina MiSeq platform with the MiSeq Reagent 222 kit v2 (#MS-102-2003) was used to sequence amplicons with a 10% PhiX spike according to manufacturer’s protocol using a final concentration of 4 pM.
Metagenomic sequencing was conducted by the University of Minnesota Genomics Center (UMGC) and the Clemson University Genomics and Bioinformatics Facility (CUGBF) (Table S1). All libraries were prepared with Nextera XT DNA Library Prep kit (part #15032355), quantified using the Kapa qPCR, and sized via the Agilent Bioanalyzer before pooling to an equimolar concentration and sequencing, using paired-end 2×150 settings on either the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 or NextSeq 550 platform.
16S rRNA gene-based analyses
Sequences were processed using mothur v1.37.6 (49), with specific quality parameters and commands indicated in the associated data repository (‘Code Availability’). Briefly, the SILVA rRNA database project (v128) (50) was used to align reads to the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene, using UCHIME to remove chimeric sequences (51). Sequences were taxonomically classified using the mothur-adapted version of the RDP database (v16) (52) using the Wang method (80% minimum bootstrap) (53). Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were clustered to 97% similarity using the OptiClust algorithm in mothur (54) and used for Shannon diversity index and pairwise Bray-Curtis dissimilarity index values. A combination of base R commands and packages were used for data visualization and statistical analyses. Nonmetric multi-dimensional scaling (NMDS) and PERMANOVA were implemented using vegan (55). The Kruskal-Wallis test was used for statistical significance across multiple groups, with a post-hoc Dunn’s test when applicable. Multivariable Association with Linear Models (MaAsLin2) was used to calculate significantly abundant OTUs between cleared vs colonized mice (56).
Data and code availability
Raw sequence data have been deposited in the Sequence Read Archive (Project PRJNA1168499). All code involved in generating analyses for this study, including processed raw data, is available at https://github.com/SeekatzLab/mouseCDI-SPF-hFMT.
Results
Human-derived microbiota engraft in mice but fail to clear C. difficile in a mouse model of recurrent infection
We previously developed a mouse model of rCDI, demonstrating that employing mouse-FMT derived microbiota from healthy, untreated mice (mFMT) rapidly cleared C. difficile (46, 63). In this model, mice are rendered susceptible to C. difficile with cefoperazone prior to spore inoculation (Figure 1A). At maximal disease severity (day 4), mice are treated with vancomycin, which results in C. difficile suppression. However, upon vancomycin cessation, C. difficile will re-colonize. In the current study, we aimed to identify human-specific microbiota with the capacity to clear C. difficile and used fecal material from different healthy human donors, including a subset of fecal sources previously used to successfully treat human patients (hFMT; n = 6 unique fecal samples) (Table S1) (34). As previously observed, mice lost weight during initial and recurrent infection (Figure 1B). Without treatment (noFMT), mice remained colonized (Figure 1C). Successful clearance of C. difficile was once again observed by healthy mouse feces (mFMT), as well as additional mouse-derived fecal material from other genotypes colonies or a spore-preparation of mouse feces (mFMT-other; Table S1 and Methods). In contrast to mFMT, none of the hFMT sources used in our study demonstrated capacity to clear C. difficile (Figure 1C, D; Table S1) (29).
We conducted 16S rRNA gene-based sequencing to identify whether failure to clear C. difficile was due to limited engraftment of human-derived microbiota in recipient mice. As assessed by non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) of the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity calculated from operational taxonomic units (OTUs), the overall microbiota structure was shifted following both antibiotic treatments and C. difficile inoculation (PERMANOVA, p < 0.001; Figure 2A). Although fecal specimens from hFMT recipients were less similar to their input communities than either mFMT or mFMT-other (Dunn’s test, p < 0.0001; Figure 2B, left panel), variability across recipients in each treatment group was relatively similar, with the exception of mice given mFMT-other, which were more similar to each other (Dunn’s test, p < 0.0001; Figure 2B, middle panel). Inter-group dissimilarity was high across all recipient comparisons, with mice receiving mFMT versus noFMT displaying the highest dissimilarity (Figure 2B, right panel).
Composition of the microbiota across treatments demonstrated increased members of Firmicutes (Bacillota) and Bacteroidetes (Bacteroidota) in both hFMT and mFMT-treated mice compared to the noFMT group, which was primarily dominated by Enterobacteria and Verrucomicrobia (Verrucomicrobiota) (Figure 2C). Specifically, many genera frequently associated with resistance to or recovery from C. difficile in mouse and human studies (30, 34, 64) were increased following both hFMT and mFMT, including Bacteroides and unclassified Lachnospiraceae species (Figure 2D, Figure S1). Within Bacteroidetes, Bacteroides dominated mice given hFMT whereas mouse-specific unclassified Porphyromonadaceae and Alistipes were more abundant in mice given mFMT. Within Firmicutes, Lactobacillus, unclassified Clostridiales, and unclassified Peptostreptococcaceae (inclusive of C. difficile) were more predominant in noFMT mice, whereas a variety of Firmicutes genera, including Blautia, Faecalibacterium, and unclassified Lachnospiraceae species, were observed in mFMT and hFMT groups. Mice given hFMT also demonstrated increased overall diversity compared to noFMT mice, although not as high as mice given mFMT (Dunn’s test, p < 0.0001; Figure 2D, E). Using MaAsLin2, we identified several differentially abundant OTUs between mice that did (mFMT, mFMT-other) or did not (hFMT, noFMT) clear. However, comparison of the abundance of these OTUs across all four groups demonstrated that many OTUs in mice given mFMT were still taxonomically represented within mice given hFMT, suggesting the presence of different but taxonomically similar species in both FMT groups. Collectively, these results support the engraftment of human-adapted microbiota in mice, including genera typically associated with successful treatment of rCDI via microbiota replacement.
FMT input source dictates species-level composition post-transplantation independent of C. difficile clearance
We conducted metagenomic sequencing to further resolve taxonomic differences between the treated mice. Similar to the 16S rRNA gene-based taxonomic profiles, the ceca of mice treated with either FMT exhibited distinct strain-level composition from untreated mice, as demonstrated by NMDS of the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity based on species abundance using MetaPhlan4 (PERMANOVA, p < 0.001; Figure 3A). Minor clustering by individual hFMT donors was also observed, although not as pronounced as among the three treatment groups. Bray-Curtis distance was highest between hFMT- and mFMT-treated mice, although the other comparisons (mFMT:noFMT, hFMT:noFMT) were also significantly different (Dunn’s test, p < 0.0001; Figure 3B). Compared to mice that received mFMT, untreated mice exhibited significantly decreased species level diversity (Wilcoxon rank-sum test, p < 0.05; Figure 3C). Decreased diversity, albeit higher than untreated mice, was also observed in mice treated with hFMT (Wilcoxon rank-sum test, p < 0.05; Figure 3C). Mice treated with either FMT were dominated by diverse Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes species compared to untreated mice, which exhibited an expansion of Verrucomicrobia (Figure 3D). Individual variation between microbiota of the mice was observed, although overall trends in composition clustered by FMT source (Supplementary S2).
MaAsLin2 was used to identify differentially abundant bacterial taxa between mice that did (“cleared”; mFMT) or did not clear C. difficile (“colonized”; hFMT or noFMT). Many of the bacterial species with the largest variation were unnamed members of the Firmicutes phylum (linear model with BH correction; q ≤0.001; Supplementary S3). Several species identified, including Acetatifactor muris, Faecalibaculum rodentium, and Duncaniella muris, are commonly found in mouse microbiota (65, 66) and are not typically associated with C. difficile infection or clearance (Figure S3). We also used MaAsLin2 to identify differentially abundant species across all three groups, independent of C. difficile clearance (Supplementary S4). This multi-group comparison demonstrated taxa unique to each group, although the majority were unnamed or unclassified (linear model with BH correction, q ≤ 0.01; Supplementary S4). Among the 165 species identified as differentially abundant, only 52 were named at the species level (linear model with BH correction, q ≤ 0.01; Figure 3E). Species such as Clostridium butyricum, Flavonifractor plautii, and Eggerthella lenta were unique to hFMT-treated mice, whereas only Clostridium methylpentosum was unique to untreated mice (Figure 3E). Some species that increased in hFMT-treated mice compared to mFMT-treated mice were those associated with a typical human microbiota, including Bacteroides fragilis, Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, and Phoecaciola vulgatus (Figure 3E). Collectively, our results suggest similar findings from initial 16S rRNA gene-based sequencing, in that human-derived taxa colonize mice post-FMT despite their inability to clear C. difficile.
Mice treated with human-derived microbiota have limited restoration of microbial metabolites typically associated with C. difficile clearance
While recovery of the microbiota community structure is correlated with CDI recovery, it is the functional recovery provided by this community that ultimately contributes to resistance or clearance. To compare how mFMT and hFMT impacted the realized functions in the gut after FMT, we conducted untargeted metabolomics of a subset of cecal samples. This included samples from mice given mFMT or hFMT (from three different donors) compared to no treatment. Comprehensive differences among the three groups were observed (PERMANOVA, p < 0.001), as assessed by NMDS of the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity based on the median-scaled and minimum-imputed abundance of metabolites (Figure 5A). Based on pairwise Bray-Curtis distance calculations, mice receiving mFMT were significantly more similar to healthy mice than any other group (Dunn’s test, p < 0.001; Figure 5B, right panel). Intra-group dissimilarity was lower than inter-group dissimilarity, with the highest dissimilarity observed between mice receiving mFMT compared to mice receiving no treatment (Figure 5B, middle and right panels). Random Forest analysis of the most important features between cleared (healthy or mFMT-treated mice) and colonized mice (hFMT or noFMT) identified increased lipid-classified compounds in cleared animals, including the bile acids isohyodeoxycholate and taurohyodeoxycholate, and the SCFAs butyrate and valerate (Figure 5C). In contrast, many amino acids and carbohydrates were decreased in cleared animals, including polyamines such as N-acetyl-cadaverine and N-acetyleputrescine and neuropeptides such as N-Acetylaspartylglutamic acid and gamma-aminobutyric acid.
We also conducted targeted analysis of metabolites previously associated with C. difficile susceptibility or resistance. The predominant gut SCFAs acetate, propionate, and butyrate all decreased during antibiotic treatment (Figure 5D-I). While acetate and propionate levels both increased following mFMT or hFMT compared to untreated mice, butyrate levels remained significantly decreased in mice given hFMT compared to mFMT (Kruskal-Wallis, p < 0.05). Of note, cecal levels of all three SCFAs never recovered to levels of uninfected mice, with untreated and hFMT-treated mice demonstrating the lowest levels of cecal butyrate (Figure 5G-I). Total primary and secondary bile acids were also decreased following hFMT compared to mFMT (Figure 5J). Following antibiotic exposure, we observed overall decreases in the secondary bile acids deoxycholic acid (DCA) and μ-muricholic acid (w-MCA), as well as the primary bile acids cholic acid (CA), α-MCA, and β -MCA (Figure 5K-P). Overall, levels of any measured bile acid were decreased in the hFMT-treated group. While partial recovery of DCA was observed in hFMT-treated mice (Figure 5K), little recovery of the mouse-specific w-MCA was observed in mice that did not clear (hFMT or noFMT) (Figure 5L). The primary bile acid and spore germinant, taurocholic acid (TCA), increased following antibiotic exposure, but decreased back to low levels in all three groups after treatment (Figure 5N). In contrast, cholic acid (CA) was highest in the no FMT group and lowest in the hFMT-treated group (Figure 5M).
Discussion
The success of FMT in treating rCDI has been linked to both the restoration of key taxa (29, 30, 64) as well as the recovery of specific metabolic functions (24, 32, 34). Although specific OTUs after FMT vary across human studies, taxonomic similarity across individuals likely fulfills redundant and necessary functions that aid C. difficile clearance. Our results using a mouse model of rCDI suggest that engraftment alone does not guarantee the functional outcomes necessary for C. difficile clearance. Despite observing engraftment of similar taxa and recovery of many gene-encoded functions following both mFMT and hFMT mice, C. difficile clearance did not occur with hFMT treatment. The inability to clear C. difficile was accompanied by deficits in microbial metabolites typically associated with clearance, implying that the mere presence of ‘healthy’ taxa and their gene-encoded functions is not sufficient to ensure FMT success. While human studies suggest that inter-individual variation in FMT outcomes for rCDI may be of minimal concern, host-or microbe-related differences between recipients and their donors could explain FMT failures for rCDI or decreased efficacy for conditions other than rCDI (45, 69, 70).
Our study assessed microbiome recovery after FMT from human- or mouse-derived sources by examining microbial composition (taxonomic), genomic potential (gene-encoded functions), and metabolites (realized functions). At the compositional level, both 16S rRNA gene-based and metagenomic sequencing demonstrated increased recovery of overall diversity and species engraftment from hFMT into mice. These findings suggest that failure to clear C. difficile was not due to an inability of human microbes to colonize the mouse gut. This observation aligns with previous studies showing that a humanized microbiota can engraft antibiotic-treated mice (71) and specifically that human microbes in a mouse can confer resistance to primary infection with C. difficile (72, 73). However, C. difficile clearance in mice using a human microbiota in the context of rCDI has not been demonstrated in the literature. More commonly, studies have assessed the ability of different human feces to resist initial C. difficile colonization, using disease severity as a measure of C. difficile resistance to identify potentially relevant resistance mechanisms (74–76). This indicates that while human microbiota transplanted into mice may be effective in preventing the initial germination and colonization of C. difficile, clearing an established infection requires a different mechanism, one that, at least in our model, could not be achieved by human microbes transplanted into a mouse gut.
Compared to taxonomic differences, differences in the gene-encoded functions across the FMT groups in our study were less pronounced. In human studies of FMT for rCDI, metagenomic analyses have primarily focused on pre-versus post-FMT changes, comparing two markedly different gut environments. More nuanced comparisons that could identify microbial genes specific to CDI recovery, such as those between successful and failed cases, are challenging due to limited sample sizes (77, 78). Our metagenomic results demonstrate that hFMT resulted in restoration of relevant functional potential, with many differences attributed to the individual fecal source independent of C. difficile clearance. Notably, hFMT-treated mice exhibited similar or even elevated levels of gene-encoded functions previously associated with C. difficile clearance (29, 38, 79, 80), including high representation of amino acid modulation in both mFMT- and hFMT-treated mice compared to untreated mice. It is possible that this result is explained by inherent bias of commonly used databases, which include many unknown bacterial genes, many of which may be biased towards cultured organisms and human-associated bacteria (81, 82). For instance, the genes responsible for the transformation of muricholic acid, a mouse-specific secondary bile acid, remain unidentified. If this function is the mouse-specific representative of the bai operon, the operon responsible for the transformation of deoxycholic acid in humans (67), our metagenomic analyses would not recover this. While our findings highlight the successful transplantation of human-derived microbes in mice, they also underscore the limitations of our current metagenomic tools in fully capturing functional dynamics, particularly in mouse models. This highlights the need for more comprehensive databases that include a broader range of bacterial genes, especially from non-human backgrounds.
Our metabolomic analyses concurred with metabolomic analyses of patients with rCDI pre- and post-FMT, demonstrating recovery of SCFAs and bile acid ratios only alongside successful clearance (32, 34, 38). In our study, mice that received hFMT exhibited lower butyrate levels compared to mice that cleared, despite metagenomic presence. Mice treated with hFMT also displayed reduced levels of secondary bile acids compared to uninfected and mFMT-treated mice, despite the known genes being present in their metagenomic counterparts. Recent advances have identified new microbial-derived bile acids that may hold importance for CDI and other host-microbe interactions, which were not included in our targeted approach (83). Emerging research has also highlighted factors beyond BA modulation and SCFA production that may aid CDI recovery, such as nutrient competition in a resistant microbiota (84, 85). C. difficile has demonstrated metabolic flexibility and is capable of metabolizing various amino acids (40). Colonization by a microbiota with diverse amino acid-utilizing capabilities is thought to restrict C. difficile through depleting available free amino acids (36, 37, 86). Although we did not directly measure amino acid levels, we observed distinct taxa across FMT groups that contribute these functions.
While transplanting microbes from one host to another represents an extreme comparison, it is reasonable to posit that certain host environments (inclusive of their extant microbes and environmental or host-specific differences) may not be translatable across the human population or disease conditions. A recent study suggested that the success of FMT in treating rCDI depends on donor-derived species that initially reduce inflammation through metabolite production, thereby facilitating the recovery of existing recipient microbes (87). Variations in diet, which has been demonstrated to influence severity of CDI (88, 89), could also drive differences in how a transplanted microbial community behaves in another host, whereby adaptation to the host’s previous diet no longer renders the same function in the new host. Perhaps most relevant, the immune status of the recipient may drive differential recognition, and thus variable activity, of the transplanted microbiota (90). Additionally, interactions between host and microbiota, including immune response, likely impact FMT efficacy. Prior inflammation has been demonstrated to increase CDI severity in mice via sustained presence of pro-inflammatory Th17 cells (91). More relevant to clearance, it was observed that Rag1-/- mice had a decreased capacity to clear C. difficile in a model of primary CDI (41). While our study did not assess immune profiles, species-specific host differences to recognize their microbial ‘self’ might impair the collective functional ability of the microbiome (92). Finally, interactions with other species may influence C. difficile virulence and microbiota functions, as has been demonstrated with Enterococcus (43). Altogether, this highlights the complexity of ecological factors involved in microbe-mediated conditions, many of which remain unresolved. Our findings provide additional insight into host-microbe interactions, offering potential avenues for enhancing the effectiveness of microbial interventions.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
Thank you to our benevolent participants for their fecal donations. We would like to acknowledge Clemson University for generous allotment of compute time on Palmetto cluster. We also thank Kwi Kim at the University of Michigan for helping us with the fecal HPLC data. This publication was made possible, in part, with support from the Clemson University Genomics and Bioinformatics Facility, which receives support from an Institutional Development Award (IDeA) from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under grant number P20GM109094. AMS was supported by grant number K01-DK111794 from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. VBY was supported by AI124255 and AI090871.
S.M. – Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Writing – original draft; and Writing – review and editing; K.C.V. – Data Collection and Curation, Methodology– original draft and Writing – review and editing; V.B.Y. – Supervision, Project Administration, Funding Acquisition – original draft, and Writing—review and editing; A.M.S. – Conceptualization, Data Collection and Curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Investigation, Supervision, Project Administration, Funding Acquisition, Writing – original draft and Writing – review and editing.