Exploring the experiences of women from African, Caribbean and Mixed heritages to inform a music-based intervention for perinatal mental health in South East London: a qualitative study
School of Psychology, University of Roehampton, London, United Kingdom
Department of Psychology, Goldsmiths, University of London, London, United Kingdom
South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
Centre for Healthcare Innovation Research, City St George’s, University of London, London, United Kingdom
Yaram Arts, London, United Kingdom
*Correspondence: Lottie Anstee, ansteel@roehampton.ac.ukAbstract
Background
Women of Global Majority ethnicities have an increased risk of developing and sustaining perinatal mental health problems in the UK. This is partially explained by the ethnic inequalities experienced at an individual, societal and systemic level, which necessitate an increased reliance on self-coping strategies to support mental health. Previous research highlights the benefits of engaging with participatory music-based interventions to alleviate symptoms of postnatal depression, stress and anxiety, but current provision lacks cultural inclusivity.
Objectives
The current study focuses on women from African, Caribbean and Mixed heritages living in South East London to explore how their perinatal experiences, coping strategies and preferences regarding music-based support could inform a future culturally inclusive perinatal participatory music intervention.
Design
This study took a qualitative approach using reflexive thematic analysis of semi-structured focus groups and interviews.
Methods
Fourteen women from African, Caribbean and Mixed heritages took part in online focus groups and interviews, led by a local community leader. Questions considered the participants’ lived experiences of the perinatal period, any coping mechanisms employed and suggestions for future participatory music groups.
Results
An inductive reflexive thematic analysis identified four overarching themes: (1) supportive mechanisms during the perinatal period, (2) the overwhelming pressures and expectations of motherhood, (3) systemic barriers to accessing perinatal mental healthcare and (4) suggestions for future perinatal creative support groups.
Conclusions
This study reveals the individual experiences of the perinatal period for women from African, Caribbean and Mixed heritages, exploring themes of sociocultural pressures, barriers to care and individual activities used to support mental health. The sociocultural, logistical and musical considerations outlined in this study highlight gaps in current community provision and offer practical suggestions for facilitating inclusive music-based interventions for perinatal mental health in South East London.
Article notes
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by a grant from The Baring Foundation, grant number: 20220721.
Introduction
One in five women in the United Kingdom (UK) will experience a mental health problem during the perinatal period,1 which encompasses pregnancy and up to a year post-birth. Poor perinatal mental health has been associated with several adverse effects, including mother-infant bonding difficulties2 and long-term infant developmental complications.3–6 Additionally, perinatal mental health problems are likely to worsen when left unrecognised and untreated, with suicide remaining the most common cause of death for mothers during the first year after birth.7–9 However, women will often underplay their symptoms and not seek support due to various healthcare barriers,10 leading to low diagnoses and treatment rates of perinatal mental health problems in the UK.3,11
Various perinatal health inequalities have been identified in relation to ethnicity, socioeconomic background, age and multimorbidity.12,13 These inequalities include an increased maternal mortality rate among women of Global Majority ethnicities,12 which encompasses those who identify as Black, African, Asian, Brown, dual-heritage, indigenous to the global south or have been racialised as ’ethnic minorities’.14,15 Women of Global Majority ethnicities are less likely to be diagnosed or treated for perinatal mental health problems and more likely to experience limited access to and quality of care.16 Evidence emphasises the systemic nature of ethnicity-related inequalities in statutory mental health services due to “monocultural and reductionist frameworks of assessment and treatment” and “direct experience of racist practice”.17 Other barriers to care for Global Majority women in the perinatal period include language and communication challenges, stigma around healthcare services, cultural expectations and family or community influences.18–21
It is important to address the inequalities in perinatal mental health support that disproportionately disadvantage women of Global Majority ethnicities. Research has suggested several approaches to improve the cultural sensitivity of healthcare services, including person-centred care and cultural awareness training.22 However, the systemic nature of the identified barriers and the longstanding mistrust of healthcare services among Global Majority communities necessitates the expansion of perinatal support into other settings, such as community and voluntary sector organisations.23 Community-based interventions are designed to support health outside of statutory healthcare facilities, using local resources and networks, and may offer more space for directly developing interventions with women of Global Majority ethnicities to address their specific cultural and socioeconomic needs. This aligns with a recent call from the World Health Organisation24 to focus on “evidence based, cost effective, and human rights oriented mental health and social care services in community-based settings for early identification and management of maternal mental disorders”.
Prior research suggests that co-locating mental health services within community settings could play a role in reducing health inequalities by improving the provision of holistic and person-centred support, increasing accessibility of services and providing psychologically safe environments separated from clinical services.25 Community-based interventions could provide a useful avenue for peer support, which has been shown to reduce isolation and increase affirmation through shared experiences of motherhood.26 Furthermore, these services could reduce stigma by being universally offered to all perinatal women, whether they are seeking a preventative support option, treatment for a perinatal mental health problem or a step-down intervention to sustain recovery. However, research highlights that there remain prevalent racial and ethnic disparities in access to community-based perinatal mental health programmes.27 This emphasises the importance of working closely with women of Global Majority ethnicities to design and deliver novel, culturally informed community perinatal mental health services.28
Participatory music-based interventions, where participants actively engage in musical activities, could represent a novel community-based perinatal support mechanism with the potential to address some of the persistent inequities experienced by Global Majority women. These interventions can foster social connections, self-development and enhanced mood regulation in diverse contexts.29 Additionally, arts engagement has been theorised to address mental health inequities through a contextualised approach across individual, provider and system levels.30 Therefore, participatory music interventions could provide an inclusive and cost-effective universal perinatal support mechanism applicable across the spectrum of mental health problems and across participants from diverse cultural backgrounds.31 Several studies on participatory music-based perinatal interventions have found them to be effective for reducing symptoms of postnatal depression, anxiety and stress.32,33 These interventions may also support women’s emotional needs, increase social connectedness and equip women with musical skills to use in their daily lives.34–36 While some research has been conducted with women of Global Majority ethnicities in other countries, including The Gambia,37 there has been little consideration of how musical activities can be integrated into inclusive community perinatal groups developed with and for diverse women in the UK.
This qualitative study explores the experiences of perinatal mental health support amongst women living in South East London and how these could inform the co-development of a culturally inclusive community music intervention. We focus specifically on women from African, Caribbean and Mixed heritages, who experience a higher risk of maternal morbidity than women from other Global Majority ethnicities.12,13 Our approach acknowledges that women from different Global Majority ethnicities have distinct perinatal mental health experiences. This study explores the experiences of women from African, Caribbean and Mixed heritages to develop an understanding of their specific perinatal mental health needs, which could be used to tailor future community support mechanisms using a culturally informed approach. In this study, we address three key research questions:
- What are the lived experiences of perinatal mental health among a sample of women from African, Caribbean and Mixed heritages living in South East London?
- What musical and other support mechanisms are used by these women during the perinatal period?
- What are their suggestions and preferences regarding a future music-based activity for perinatal mental health?
Methodology
Setting
The setting for this study, South East London, encompasses the London boroughs of Southwark, Lambeth, Lewisham, Greenwich, Bexley, Bromley and their surrounding areas. The boroughs within South East London have a high level of ethnic diversity. For example, in a survey of residents from Southwark and Lambeth, 21.9% of participants identified as Black Caribbean or Black African.38 Additionally, census data from 2021 reported that 26.8% of Lewisham residents identified as Black, Black British, Caribbean or African.39
Design
This study used a qualitative research design to centralise the voices of the participants and gain rich insights into their perinatal experiences. It describes the inductive reflexive thematic analysis of eight focus groups and interviews conducted with women from African, Caribbean and Mixed heritages living in South East London. This study received ethical approval from the Goldsmiths, University of London, Research Ethics Sub-Committee (RESC) in 2023. Participants provided electronic written informed consent after reviewing a participant information sheet, which included information on data confidentiality and right to withdraw. Participants were given a voucher to reimburse them for their time. This study follows the COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative research (COREQ) checklist.40
Participants
Fourteen participants were recruited between December 2023 and August 2024. The inclusion criteria were: women who have given birth to at least one infant, are able to speak and understand English, are aged 18 years or older, live in South East London and identify as being from an African, Caribbean or Mixed heritage background. Women were included who identified with one of the following ethnicities: Caribbean, African, White and Black Caribbean, White and Black African or any other Black, Black British or Caribbean background. The recruitment was conducted by a local community leader from South East London (TA), who identifies as being from an African, Caribbean and Mixed heritage background and has experience supporting perinatal women in the community. Potential participants were contacted via text message or email to inform them about the study. Recruitment was initially conducted purposively, with TA contacting potential participants from existing connections, and later through snowball sampling to utilise the networks of participants. No interviewees refused to participate or wished to withdraw.
Materials
A semi-structured focus group and interview guide was created by the authors in consultation with professionals from a local voluntary sector organisation and through reviewing previous literature. The focus groups and interviews offered a space for participants to elaborate on their lived experience of the perinatal period and their perspectives on perinatal support mechanisms, including the potential uses of music. Questions centred on the following topics: (1) the types and impact of perinatal stresses, (2) the factors contributing to perinatal mental health problems, (3) existing perinatal support mechanisms, (4) the potential uses of musical activities and (5) suggestions for perinatal music-based support groups. The semi-structured nature of the focus groups and interviews allowed similar questions to be asked across the participant group, while being used flexibly alongside follow-up questions to delve into participants’ responses. The full focus group and interview guide can be found in Table 1.
Procedure
Each participant took part in either a focus group or an individual interview, which were all led by TA. Eight focus groups and interviews were conducted between December 2023 and August 2024, with an average duration of 53 minutes (range = 19-88 minutes). Table 2 details the number assigned to each focus group and interview, alongside the number of participants who took part in each. Focus groups and interviews were conducted via Microsoft Teams and video recorded with automatic transcription following the consent of each participant. Participants were aware of the reasons behind the research and some had existing connections with the interviewer.
Analysis
A reflexive thematic analysis was chosen to consider how knowledge is constructed through the salient features of participants’ responses and acknowledge the influence of researcher positionality.41–43 The analysis was completed by two research assistants, JF and LA, who both have training and experience in qualitative methods. Both authors regularly discussed how their individual subjectivities and opinions on the benefits of perinatal music influenced their interpretations, following the principles of reflexivity.42 Acknowledging these subjectivities enabled them to purposefully incorporate a diverse range of preferences regarding perinatal music interventions, including negative perspectives, to centre the voices of the participants. Additionally, both analysts acknowledged their privileged positions as White women and recognised the importance of exploring the influence of their background on each analytical step through reflexive journaling. JF and LA discussed all evolving interpretations, potential cultural biases and clarifications with TA to ensure that each theme meaningfully and accurately represented the voices and experiences of women from African, Caribbean and Mixed heritages. The analysis was conducted according to the philosophical underpinning of critical realism, which acknowledges that reality can only be observed through each individual’s subjective perspectives. This theoretical basis enabled the analysts to balance the individual meanings of participant’s experiences with reflection on the wider contexts through which these meanings are mediated.
Initially, the automatic transcriptions were edited using the recording to check for accuracy. Transcripts were read several times for familiarisation, enabling the analysts to document preliminary reflexive and analytical thoughts. The two analysts individually systematically coded each transcript using NVivo, identifying salient and meaningful features of each participant’s narrative through implicit and explicit interpretations of the data. The process was inductive to acknowledge the exploratory nature of the analysis and centre the lived experience voices of participants. The coding was also conducted iteratively and flexibly to incorporate additional interpretations as they were considered. The two analysts then collaboratively developed a map of themes and subthemes by collating the codes into coherent meaning-united interpretations. The themes were developed through aggregation of codes with shared meanings and multiple iterative discussions between the analysts. Themes were reviewed in relation to the whole dataset and refined with a clear definition through further engagement with the transcripts. The collaboration between the two analysts enabled a richer discussion of the complexities within participant narratives and supported the credibility of the analysis.
Results
Four themes incorporating eleven subthemes were identified, as mapped in Figure 1. The first three themes explore individual activities used to support perinatal mental health, sociocultural pressures and barriers to care, with the final theme encapsulating how the experiences and preferences of participants could inform future culturally inclusive music-based provision.
1.Supportive Mechanisms During the Perinatal Period
1.1Emotional and practical support from family and friends
Participants valued help from their family and friends during their perinatal experience, particularly for practical support during mental and physical recovery post-birth."I was so grateful that my mum made me move into her house after I came back home from the hospital, because I don’t know how I would have coped. She was literally the one that forced food down my mouth." (Focus Group 1)
While many relied on family and friends, several participants expressed challenges with these relationships during the perinatal period, as family members or friends could become critical or domineering."There’s no understanding there all the time, or you don’t feel you get as much support because they’re not in your position. Or you’re judged for being in that position" (Focus Group 4)
For some participants, having a supportive partner was most important, emphasising the potential challenges for those without a partner."if you don’t have a partner in the house that can help you with certain situations, it’s a tremendous burden and a struggle I find upon women." (Focus Group 2)
Logistical barriers to familial and friend support networks, such as social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic or family living in a different country, left some participants feeling isolated during the perinatal period.
1.2Connection with wider community networks
Participants discussed the importance of wider social networks, especially in cases where they had limited support from friends, family or a partner. Being part of a community group with other parents was beneficial for some participants to share experiences and feel less isolated.“I would say meeting up with other mothers… it’s a big thing … it’s sharing your journeys together and realising that somebody is going through the same thing as you" (Interview 3)
However, some participants spoke about how these community groups made them feel excluded, partly due to a lack of representation of participants from similar cultural or socioeconomic backgrounds. This made some participants feel unable to share their experiences, worrying about judgement from other parents."I always feel like there needs to be a Black NCT [National Childbirth Trust] group … where I could meet like-minded mums that have some shared experiences. It’s very different to having a White son, having a Black son, because we have different things that we are worrying about." (Focus Group 2)
Participants also discussed the lack of available community support, which left them feeling even more isolated during the perinatal period, exacerbating mental health problems."the lack of support is actually causing a lot more issues where women are feeling more and more isolated, feeling more and more alone and despondent." (Interview 2)
1.3Engaging in varied and creative activities
Participants discussed a wide range of activities used for support during the perinatal period, such as walking, journalling, reading and shopping. Creative activities, including listening to music and singing, were often mentioned and associated with a broad range of benefits, such as emotional release."when we listen to songs and the words that are in the songs, there’s a healing behind it, there’s emotion behind it. And it kind of allows you…it forces you to recognise that if you need to cry, you cry." (Focus Group 1)
Music listening also enabled mothers to feel more present and relaxed, offering a mechanism for emotional regulation during times of significant stress."I loved listening to music. Music was always my kind of outreach for just relaxing or just sitting in the park and grounding my feet on the grass when the weather was good." (Focus Group 4)
Others described the impact of dancing to music to help them feel empowered and connected with their infant. However, several participants did not use music-based activities during the perinatal period and each had a specific preference for the type of supportive activities that brought them comfort."I didn’t want to talk to people or be around people and so I think not having the pressures of interaction with others, that’s like organised fun, will mean that you can have some type of outlet in your own setting." (Focus Group 3)
2.The overwhelming pressures and expectations of motherhood
2.1Feeling consumed by the transition to motherhood
Participants often described feeling that their social identity as a mother had become all-consuming, emphasising the overwhelming changes to routine and prioritisation of their infant’s needs over their own. The loss of personal identity and independence was challenging for most participants."it’s fine to grieve your old life, because it’s a massive change to have nobody dependent on you and just being able to get up and go about your daily life to suddenly having someone solely dependent on you." (Interview 4)
For some participants, the uncertainty of pregnancy, birth and motherhood were also overwhelming."I don’t think we’re good at being OK with not knowing. I think the fear of that is really crippling a lot of people sadly in this and it’s causing a lot of anxiety with wanting to know how am I going to do this? What’s this birth going to be?" (Interview 2)
Participants described the potential harm of comparing their experiences with unrealistic societal expectations of motherhood, especially when participating in community groups. Separating expectation from reality enabled some participants to better support their perinatal mental health.
2.2Mentality of perseverance and resilience
Several prominent sociocultural expectations regarding the perinatal period were highlighted as key barriers to accessing support. One prominent expectation was that women should persevere through their difficulties and show mental resilience. Some described this in a positive light, discussing ways to work on their mental health productively and develop coping strategies."What can help, I think, is about knowing the strategies beforehand, so techniques and things that you can do day to day. So different people do different things: some people put on one of those apps, like CBT [cognitive behavioural therapy] training apps, where you can try and change your thoughts and how you’re feeling." (Focus Group 2)
However, most participants feared judgement from others if they did not live up to the expectation of resilience and perseverance."Especially culturally, a lot of women of colour or ethnic minorities are expected to just get on with it and it’s a blessing you had a child, you shouldn’t be miserable – “the baby blues” as some people call it. In some cultures, they don’t even call it that, they just tell you to get on with it." (Interview 1)
One participant felt that women from African, Caribbean and Mixed heritages were generally not accessing community groups or other avenues of support for their mental health, perhaps due to these cultural expectations."I guess for me as well, culturally, Black women don’t go to these kinds of groups essentially. You know, you kind of just stay at home, get on with it" (Focus Group 1)
2.3Impact of perinatal life and health stressors
This subtheme relates to the various life pressures faced by the participants and how these impacted stress levels and overall perinatal mental health. Financial stress was a major contributor to poor perinatal mental health, especially worries around keeping a job and being able to financially support their new family."you might have a low mood because of the actual hormonal impacts, but then … you’re also thinking about actually the financial implications of having a child." (Focus Group 3)
Participants also discussed the impact that poor physical health had on their mental health. Some described the lack of support for debilitating physical perinatal symptoms and the challenges of high-risk pregnancies."I also had something called hyperemesis, which is like debilitating sickness throughout my whole pregnancy. So I spent a huge majority of my time just in a dark room in bed, vomiting, curtains closed and not being able to eat or function. And that had a huge effect on my mental health, because I was depressed." (Focus Group 1)
Experiencing a traumatic birth also significantly impacted stress levels for new mothers."I had a traumatic birth, passed out, ended up in A&E and then I think it was more the stress and the trauma of having to wake up after giving birth and make my way to hospital everyday for a few weeks to look after a child and leave your child in the care of someone else." (Focus Group 2)
Participants struggled with the fact that these stressors could be unpredictable, unavoidable, debilitating and could significantly impact their mental health.
4Suggestions for future perinatal creative support groups
4.1Varied priorities and preferences for activities
Participants had diverse preferences around the use of music in perinatal support groups and the types of activities that would be most engaging. Some participants expressed significant interest in group singing during the perinatal period, depending on the type of musical activity."Every time I’ve done karaoke with people that I don’t know, I’ve had a great time. I don’t know them, but we’ve picked songs and they like their song and you big them up. The energy’s right. So I think that kind of singing is great" (Focus Group 3)
Other participants expressed hesitation towards group singing, including concerns about feeling self-conscious, lacking expertise and feeling intimidated in a group setting."I’m giving myself an extra thing to be anxious and worried about, so … I think for me it wouldn’t – as much as I love music and I know lots of songs – it would be a turn off for me." (Focus Group 2)
Karaoke was suggested several times to accommodate different genre preferences and engage participants in an enjoyable musical activity. Others identified more with songwriting as a mechanism to reflect on personal experiences and create memorable songs to use with their infant. While many of the suggested activities offered nurturing components for both the women and their infants, some participants emphasised the importance of prioritising women’s needs."I was kind of thinking, probably selfishly, but I’ve always thought it was more me-time, this is a time for me to go out and do something for me, like on my own." (Focus Group 4)
4.2Strategies to facilitate inclusivity and accessibility
This subtheme explores how perinatal support groups can utilise a flexible and diverse approach, prioritising each individual’s needs to increase inclusivity. Participants typically preferred groups to be scheduled in the middle of the day to best accommodate conflicting responsibilities, such as childcare for older children, and spread out across a range of locations."So if I ever do an activity, it’ll be between 10:00 and 2:00. I won’t do anything before or after. Also thinking about drop-in: I think there’s so much pressure when you’re a parent, because it starts at let’s say 11:00, and if I’ve missed it by 10 minutes, I’m now not going at all." (Focus Group 3)
Participants discussed the benefits and drawbacks of conducting perinatal support groups online versus in-person. While the online format was logistically easier and presented less physical barriers to accessing the group, participants emphasised the power of having in-person sessions for a more connected and engaging experience."I like the idea of online. So you’ve not got the stress and the worry of organising your child and getting them ready. But then also, I do like in-person as well. So a choice of both?" (Interview 1)
Furthermore, cultural inclusivity was also a key consideration to enable participants to identify themselves in both the musical content and group demographics. Participants discussed the importance of celebrating a variety of musical genres, including popular music from different decades and multicultural songs from around the world."Are we cognisant of other cultures? Are we having African music, for example, and Afro Caribbean music and other cultural music? Or is it just going to be Mozart? Or a certain type of music, because even in those little nuances, we can unpick that and say, okay, this might not be for me." (Interview 2)
Several other strategies for accessibility were suggested, including subsidised costs for those with lower socioeconomic status and accommodating the needs of neurodivergent participants.
Discussion
Our findings encompass the varied lived experiences of fourteen women from African, Caribbean and Mixed heritages living in South East London. Participants outlined a wide range of individual, sociocultural and systemic barriers faced during the perinatal period, the activities they used to support themselves and suggestions for future music-based interventions for diverse women.
Participants often used informal support mechanisms to maintain and improve their perinatal mental health. Self-care behaviours, such as physical exercise and relaxation techniques, have been associated with improved perinatal wellbeing.44,45 Participants discussed how informal sources of support often replaced the use of formal services, which aligns with the low rates of help-seeking and diagnosis of perinatal mental health problems in prior research.3,11 This reliance on informal support could be partially explained by the pressures of mental resilience and social stigma that participants faced,21 deterring them from seeking mental health support.46 These preferences could also be a result of the systemic ethnicity-related inequalities and discrimination embedded in statutory mental healthcare services.17 Improving the provision of informal and community-level support may help to mitigate some of the significant barriers that women from African, Caribbean and Mixed heritages experience related to stigma and societal prejudice.21,23
Participants also emphasised the importance of strong social connections with partners, family, friends and other community members, which aligns with prior research on the benefits of partner and peer support in the perinatal period.26,47 However, several women discussed the lack of available avenues of community support when family were not living nearby, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. Community connection was highlighted by participants as a key mechanism to incorporate in future interventions, as social isolation remains highly prevalent in the perinatal period and has a central role in experiences of perinatal depression.48 However, participants also indicated the importance of a nuanced approach, acknowledging how women can feel excluded from community groups due to a lack of ethnic diversity and difficulties connecting with those from different backgrounds. Prior research confirms the prevalence of ethnic and other socioeconomic inequalities within community perinatal mental health services in the UK.27,49 Providing culturally aware and person-centred approaches might encourage more engagement from women from African, Caribbean and Mixed heritages and tackle broader socioeconomic inequalities embedded in community services.22,28,50
This study identified a range of personal barriers to seeking mental health support, including financial pressures, difficult relationships and stresses around physical health. However, many of the significant barriers experienced by participants were embedded within existing healthcare provision or wider sociocultural norms. Participants discussed the limited awareness and recognition of perinatal mental health problems amongst their families, friends and sometimes healthcare providers, which aligns with similar prior research in other UK settings.10,50 This barrier was especially evident across our participant group due to cross-cultural differences in language around mental health, with some cultures lacking a direct translation for depression and others using phrases that may underplay the potential severity of perinatal mental health problems. For example, the term “baby blues” was used to describe postnatal depression, despite it’s definition referring to a shorter-term change in psychological state due to hormonal fluctuations after birth.51 Participants also discussed fear of repercussions and negative experiences with healthcare professionals as a barrier to seeking help. Stigma and mistrust of healthcare services are widely recognised barriers to healthcare for diverse populations.52,53 Promoting culturally sensitive discussion around perinatal mental health across society is necessary to address different sociocultural understandings of mental health and provide diverse populations of women with support strategies.
Although a wide variety of perinatal coping strategies were discussed, creative activities were often mentioned as a useful form of support. Women mentioned several benefits of engaging in music for perinatal mental health, including emotional expression, healing, relaxation, empowerment and connection. Similar mechanisms have been identified in previous research on participatory music interventions for perinatal mental health, including achievement, bonding, positivity and immersion.35 Our study demonstrates the significant potential benefits of developing more participatory music interventions for perinatal mental health within different community settings. It is especially important to co-develop these interventions with women from African, Caribbean and Mixed heritages, who may be deterred from engaging in perinatal music-based groups due to a lack of inclusivity and diversity.54 This will address the current paucity of perinatal music research on culturally inclusive interventions and align with recent UK policy recommendations on improving equitable access to musical care during the beginning of life.55 This study also extends prior research by exploring different preferences regarding musical support from the perspectives of women with lived experience. Some women discussed their preference for a certain type of musical activity, such as songwriting without singing or participant-led karaoke instead of structured sessions, and a minority of participants did not wish to use music to support them perinatally. The potential unintended consequences and barriers to engaging in music-based interventions have not always been considered in the field of arts and health,56 but this study highlights the importance of considering these nuances and diverse preferences during music-based intervention development.
Recommendations for future music-based interventions
Overall, our analysis indicates three broad areas of consideration for future participatory music-based interventions in community contexts to ensure inclusivity of women from diverse ethnic backgrounds: (1) sociocultural awareness, (2) logistical factors and accessibility and (3) musical considerations (see Figure 2).
These recommendations nuance existing research on the diverse mechanisms through which engagement in music interventions supports perinatal mental health in varying community and clinical settings.57 Across these recommendations is an overarching consideration of inclusive practices, including community-specific understandings of social stigma, prejudice, cultural pressures and expectations that may be experienced by intervention participants. While providing some specific suggestions to guide future interventions, these recommendations emphasise the importance of different options to support diverse preferences and modes of engagement.
Limitations
One limitation of this study is the power dynamics implicit in the positionality of the two analysts as White researchers seeking to research the in-depth experiences of women from Global Majority ethnicities, where a lack of understanding of their positioning and subjectivities can lead to misrepresentation.58 We incorporated several approaches in our analysis to mitigate this potential limitation, including meaningfully centralising the voices of participants through ongoing reference to the transcripts and reflexive journaling. We also incorporated regular discussion with the local community leader and expert by experience (TA), which ensured the developing themes fully reflected the personal experiences of women from African, Caribbean and Mixed heritages. TA led the interviews and focus groups to enable deeper connection with participants and a richer exploration of personal experiences. Additionally, we acknowledge that some individuals may not resonate with the terminology used to describe ethnicity in this study and future research is warranted to explore the language that best reflects the preferences of Global Majority individuals.
Another limitation of this study is that the focus groups and interviews were completed online and in English, which may have excluded participants with limited digital literacy or knowledge of the English language. The online nature of the focus groups and interviews may have limited participant engagement, as rapport was more difficult to establish and instances of poor internet connection affected the depth of discussion. The scope of this paper was limited to South East London, so the findings may not be representative of other contexts across London or the UK. Although some of the themes from this study have been found in other communities around the world who experience ethnicity-based inequalities in perinatal mental health,59 we acknowledge the non-generalisable nature of the study. Future community-specific inquiries should be made in other contexts to ensure interventions meet the needs of their local population.
Conclusion
This qualitative research study demonstrates some of the key narratives prevalent across the perinatal experiences of women from African, Caribbean and Mixed heritages, including (1) supportive mechanisms during the perinatal period, (2) the overwhelming pressures and expectations of motherhood, (3) systemic barriers to accessing perinatal mental healthcare and (4) suggestions for future perinatal creative support groups. This paper provides several important considerations to enhance the cultural sensitivity of future perinatal mental health community services. Additionally, this study highlights how coproduction of perinatal mental health interventions with women from African, Caribbean and Mixed heritages is essential to address implicit health inequalities. Inclusive perinatal mental health interventions may be characterised by a personalised and flexible approach, diverse representation, emphasis on social connection and stigma reduction. Future research is warranted to explore how the recommendations elicited from this study can be realised through a culturally informed participatory music intervention.
Data Availability
The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are not publicly available to protect the privacy and confidentiality of participants.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank everyone who participated in an interview or focus group.
Statements and declarations
Ethical considerations
The Research Ethics Sub-Committee (RESC) at Goldsmiths, University of London, approved this study on June 29, 2023.
Consent to participate
Participants gave written informed consent before starting an interview or focus group.
Declaration of conflicting interest
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by a grant from The Baring Foundation, grant number: 20220721.
Data availability
The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are not publicly available to protect the privacy and confidentiality of participants.