Mechanisms Underlying Synergistic Killing of Polymyxin B in Combination with Cannabidiol against Acinetobacter baumannii: A Metabolomic Study
1Department of Biochemistry and Pharmacology, School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia; maytham.hussein@unimelb.edu.au (M.H.); rafah.allobawi@unimelb.edu.au (R.A.); ilevou@student.unimelb.edu.au (I.L.)
2Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia; m.blaskovich@imb.uq.edu.au
3Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; gaurirao@live.unc.edu
4Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Department of Microbiology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia
*Correspondence: jian.li@monash.edu (J.L.); tony.velkov@unimelb.edu.au (T.V.)Abstract
Polymyxins have resurged as the last-resort antibiotics against multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. As reports of polymyxin resistance in A. baumannii with monotherapy have become increasingly common, combination therapy is usually the only remaining treatment option. A novel and effective strategy is to combine polymyxins with non-antibiotic drugs. This study aimed to investigate, using untargeted metabolomics, the mechanisms of antibacterial killing synergy of the combination of polymyxin B with a synthetic cannabidiol against A. baumannii ATCC 19606. The antibacterial synergy of the combination against a panel of Gram-negative pathogens (Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) was also explored using checkerboard and static time-kill assays. The polymyxin B–cannabidiol combination showed synergistic antibacterial activity in checkerboard and static time-kill assays against both polymyxin-susceptible and polymyxin-resistant isolates. The metabolomics study at 1 h demonstrated that polymyxin B monotherapy and the combination (to the greatest extent) significantly perturbed the complex interrelated metabolic pathways involved in the bacterial cell envelope biogenesis (amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism, peptidoglycan, and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) biosynthesis), nucleotides (purine and pyrimidine metabolism) and peptide metabolism; notably, these pathways are key regulators of bacterial DNA and RNA biosynthesis. Intriguingly, the combination caused a major perturbation in bacterial membrane lipids (glycerophospholipids and fatty acids) compared to very minimal changes induced by monotherapies. At 4 h, polymyxin B–cannabidiol induced more pronounced effects on the abovementioned pathways compared to the minimal impact of monotherapies. This metabolomics study for the first time showed that in disorganization of the bacterial envelope formation, the DNA and RNA biosynthetic pathways were the most likely molecular mechanisms for the synergy of the combination. The study suggests the possibility of cannabidiol repositioning, in combination with polymyxins, for treatment of MDR polymyxin-resistant Gram-negative infections.
1. Introduction
Antimicrobial resistance has become a major threat to health and economic wellbeing worldwide [1]. The rapid emergence of MDR Gram-negative pathogens (e.g., carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii) that cause difficult or impossible-to-treat infections is gaining momentum [1,2]. A. baumannii is often associated with serious nosocomial and community-acquired infections e.g., pneumonia and blood stream infections [3,4]. In the 1970s, this notorious pathogen was thought to be sensitive to most antibiotics, but today it appears to have extensive resistance to most currently used antibiotics, including polymyxins [5]. The World Health Organization (WHO) has, therefore, listed this pathogen as one of the top-priority pathogens that urgently need new antibiotics [6]. The clinical pipeline for new antimicrobials is dry; therefore, the development of novel therapeutic strategies to combat these deadly pathogens is warranted [1,7].
Colistin, also known as polymyxin E, and polymyxin B (cyclic lipopeptides) are last-resort antibiotics for Gram-negative pathogens resistant to essentially all other antibiotics [8]. It is purported that polymyxins exert their antimicrobial action primarily by disorganizing the Gram-negative outer membrane (OM) via direct interaction with the lipopolysaccharide (LPS); however, the precise mechanism of action is still uncertain [9,10]. Worryingly, there has been an increase in reports of polymyxin resistance among Gram-negative bacteria, including A. baumannii, particularly following polymyxin monotherapy [11,12,13]. The complete LPS loss or lipid A modification with positively charged moieties (phosphoethanolamine (PEtN) or galactosamine (GalN)) are considered the most common modes of polymyxin resistance observed in A. baumannii [12,14,15].
A cost-effective strategy that is gaining momentum is the combination of antibiotics with non-antibiotic compounds that facilitate the exertion of ‘off-target’ antibacterial properties against the bacterial cell [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. The advent of metabolomics, comprising cutting-edge bioanalytical techniques and bioinformatics, provides a new strategy for fathoming the complex interactions between cellular processes and elucidating the complex modes of action following antibiotic exposure [24,25,26,27].
Cannabis sativa is an herbaceous plant that has been used as a medicinal and recreational agent for centuries worldwide [28]. This complex plant comprises more than 400 chemical entities, including many terpenes and approximately 180 cannabinoids (e.g., Δ9 tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9 THC) and cannabidiol (CBD)) [29,30]. The antibacterial activity of cannabinoids was reported in detail for the first time in the 1950s [31,32]. Later, in 1976, van Klingeren et al. reported that ∆9-THC and CBD displayed bacteriostatic and bactericidal effects against a panel of Gram-positive pathogens such as staphylococci and streptococci [33]. However, the cannabinoids’ antimicrobial effects had been largely overlooked until 2008, when the antibacterial activity of five major cannabinoids (CBD, THC, cannabichromene (CBC), cannabigerol (CBG), and cannabinol (CBN)) were tested against a wide range of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains. The study revealed that all compounds possessed low MIC values (0.5–2 μg/ mL) [34]. As a result, there has been growing interest in the antibacterial properties of cannabinoids in the quest to discover new lead compounds. Subsequent and more recent studies have provided further insights into the chemical and antimicrobial characterization of various chemical entities in Cannabis sativa as well as synthetic CBD [35,36,37].
Mark and co-workers recently confirmed their previous findings by testing the killing activity of CBD against highly resistant Staphylococcus aureus (e.g., methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus MRSA), Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Clostridioides difficile as well as the ‘urgent threat’ Gram-negative pathogen Neisseria gonorrhoeae. They also noticed that cannabinoids were able to effectively disorganize biofilms and sustain their antibacterial effects under extended exposure conditions [38]. Furthermore, in line with previous reports, the study showed that CBD was inactive against the most notorious Gram-negative pathogens, namely K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii. However, combining CBD with colistin and polymyxin B caused a synergistic killing effect against A. baumannii and K. pneumoniae, suggesting that polymyxins might permeabilize the outer membrane and enable the entry of CBD to exert its action [38,39]. The mechanistic studies (including radiolabeled macromolecular synthesis assays, membrane depolarization assays and fluorescent microscopy) of CBD against S. aureus indicated that CBD disrupts the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane, though the precise mode of action is still elusive and further studies at the molecular level are warranted [38].
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the antibacterial synergy of synthetic CBD in combination with polymyxin B against a panel of polymyxin-resistant and -susceptible Gram-negative pathogens and elucidate, for the first time, the potential mechanism of the bacterial killing effects of polymyxins enhanced by CBD against A. baumannii, using untargeted metabolomics. The presented findings underlie the effective synergy and clinical potential of the polymyxin B–CBD combination for the treatment of MDR polymyxin-resistant Gram-negative infections.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Bacterial Isolates
Ten different A. baumannii isolates, including 5 polymyxin B-susceptible and 5 polymyxin B-resistant strains; 10 different K. pneumoniae isolates, including 6 polymyxin B-susceptible and 4 polymyxin B-resistant strains; and 7 different P. aeruginosa isolates, including 3 polymyxin B-susceptible and 4 polymyxin B-resistant strains (Table 1), were employed in this study.
2.2. Determination of MIC and FIC
The MICs of polymyxin B and CBD were determined for all bacterial isolates in triplicate on separate days using broth microdilution checkerboard assays. The MIC is defined as the lowest concentration of antimicrobial agent that shows a complete inhibition of visible bacterial growth after overnight incubation. The polymyxin B and CBD stock solutions were prepared immediately before each experiment. Polymyxin B (Betapharma, Shanghai, China) powder was dissolved in MilliQ water and sterilized by membrane syringe filters with a pore size of 0.22 micron (ThermoFisher Scientific, Melbourne, VIC, Australia). Cannabidiol (CBD) (Cayman Chemicals, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA) was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; Sigma-Aldrich, Melbourne, VIC, Australia). Serial concentrations of DMSO (0.25%, 0.5%, 1%, 2.5% v/v) showed no inhibitory effect against all bacteria tested. Serial dilutions (2-fold) of the polymyxin B and CBD were prepared in a cation-adjusted Mueller–Hinton broth (CAMHB; Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) to obtain solutions with various concentrations. The experiments were performed in 96-well microtiter plates (Techno Plas, Adelaide, SA, Australia) in broth culture containing ~106 CFU/mL of the bacteria tested. The microdilution plates were incubated at 37 °C for 18–20 h.
The synergy tests for the combination were conducted using the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) analysis. The formula used to calculate the FIC values was as follows: FICI = (MIC of drug A in combination ÷ MIC of drug A alone) + (MIC of drug B in combination ÷ MIC of drug B alone). The FICI results were defined as: synergism FIC < 0.5; addition FIC = 0.5–1.0; indifference FIC = 1–4; antagonism FIC ≥ 4 [22]. An MIC of 128 µg/mL for CBD was used to calculate the FICI scores.
2.3. Static Time-Kill Studies
Based on FIC results, static time-kill assays of polymyxin B monotherapy and in combination with CBD were performed against selected strains from different species. Prior to each time-kill assay, a sub-culture of the selected bacterial isolate was prepared from its stock cultures and incubated at 37 °C for 18~24 h. To prepare overnight culture, a single colony was transferred from nutrient agar plate to inoculate 10 mL of fresh CAMHB (Oxoid, UK) in a 50 mL Falcon tube (ThermoFisher Scientific, Australia) and incubated overnight (~16 h) in a water bath shaker at a temperature of 37 °C and 150 rpm shaking speed. Subsequently, the log phase was induced by inoculating 100 µL from the overnight culture into 10 mL of fresh CAMHB broth and incubated at 37 °C in a water bath shaker (shaking speed, 150 rpm) for 2 h. A 200 µL aliquot of bacterial suspension was inoculated into 4 borosilicate culture tubes (capacity 50 mL) containing 20 mL (1:100 dilution) of fresh CAMHB each. Three treatment tubes containing a starting culture of bacteria were spiked with the desired concentrations of polymyxin B and CBD monotherapies or in combination. One culture tube was drug-free to represent the control. At 0, 1, 4, 8 and 24 h, samples were taken from each tube and serially diluted in 0.9% saline, and then automatically plated onto nutrient agar plates using a Whitley Automated Spiral Plater (WASP). After 24 h incubation at 37 °C, the number of colonies on the plates were counted, and the time-kill graphs were plotted as time (hours) vs. log10 CFU/mL.
2.6. Data Processing, Bioinformatics, and Statistical Analyses
The LC–MS data processing, bioinformatics and statistical analysis were performed as we have previously described [41].
3. Results
3.1. Synergy Testing of Polymyxin B–Cannabidiol Combinations (FICI Calculation)
The synergistic antibacterial activity of polymyxin B and CBD as monotherapies and in combination was tested against a panel of clinical isolates of A. baumannii, P. aeruginosa, and K. pneumoniae (Table 1). The polymyxin B and CBD combinations demonstrated synergistic antibacterial activity against all of the tested strains of the three species A. baumannii, P. aeruginosa, and K. pneumoniae except for one A. baumannii (the LPS-deficient A. baumannii FADDI-AB065, indifference FICI = 2) and one P. aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa FADDI-PA019m, additive FICI = 0.53) (Table 1). On the other hand, polymyxin B and CBD monotherapies were found to be ineffective (MICs 8 to >128 mg/L) against the polymyxin B-resistant isolates (except for A. baumannii FADDI-AB065, CBD MIC = 0.5 mg/L) (Table 1).
3.2. Static Time-Kill Studies
The time-kill assessment of polymyxin B and CBD as monotherapies or in combination was further carried out against polymyxin B-susceptible A. baumannii strain ATCC 19606 (polymyxin B MIC = 1 mg/L, CBD MIC > 64 mg/L) and polymyxin B-resistant A. baumannii strain FADDI-AB144 (polymyxin B MIC = 8 mg/L, CBD MIC > 64 mg/L); polymyxin B-resistant P. aeruginosa strains FADDI-PA070 (polymyxin B MIC = 128 mg/L, CBD MIC > 64 mg/L) and FADDI-PA006 (polymyxin B MIC = 8 mg/L, CBD MIC > 64 mg/L); and polymyxin B-susceptible K. pneumoniae strain FADDI-KP002 (polymyxin B MIC = 0.5 mg/L, CBD MIC > 64 mg/L) and polymyxin B-resistant K. pneumoniae strain FADDI-KP012 (polymyxin B MIC = 32 mg/L, CBD MIC > 64 mg/L) (Figure 1).
Polymyxin B monotherapy displayed significant killing activity against A. baumannii ATCC 19606, as manifested by a >2 log10 CFU/mL decline in bacterial counts compared with the control (untreated) at early time points (1 and 4 h); however, the killing curve of polymyxin B was comparable with the control at 24 h. Insignificant killing effect against the same strain was observed following CBD monotherapy across all time points (Figure 1). On the other hand, polymyxin B–CBD combination showed a higher killing curve compared to the control at all time exposures (>−2 log10 CFU/mL, 1 h; ≥−4 log10 CFU/mL, 4 and 8 h; >−3.5 log10 CFU/mL, 24 h). No significant decrease in the bacterial burden was noticed following polymyxin B (except at 4 h, −2 log10 CFU/mL) and CBD monotherapy against FADDI-AB144 at all time points, whilst a more than 4 log10 CFU/mL decrease in bacterial count compared with control was seen after the combination at 1 and 4 h (Figure 1). The combination also continued to reduce the bacterial burden by ≥2 log10 CFU/mL at later time points (8 and 24 h). Against K. pneumoniae strains, although a higher killing curve was observed after polymyxin B monotherapy (−3.0 log10 CFU/mL) against K. pneumoniae FADDI-KP002 at early time points (1 and 4 h), inconsistent regrowth occurred, with very minor log10 CFU/mL difference compared to the control after 24 h. Notably, the combination therapy was more effective in bacterial killing, as manifested by a ≥4.0–6.0 log10 CFU/mL decrease in bacterial counts compared with untreated controls across all time points (except 24 h). However, a completely different scene was observed against K. pneumoniae FADDI-KP012, wherein polymyxin B monotherapy did not display significant bacterial killing at all time points, as manifested by time-kill curves that resembled untreated controls (Figure 1). Nevertheless, polymyxin B and CBD combination therapy displayed potent bacterial killing effect, peaking at 1 and 4 h with a 3.0–6.0 log10 CFU/mL decline in bacterial counts compared to the control, which was sustained with a 3.0–4.0 log10 CFU/mL decline after 8 and 24 h, respectively, compared to the control (Figure 1). Regarding P. aeruginosa strains, only the combination therapy was effective in causing significant bacterial killing activity, as manifested by a >1.5–3 log10 CFU/mL (FADDI-PA006) and >5–6 log10 CFU/mL (FADDI-PA070) decrease in the bacterial burden across all time exposures (Figure 1). CBD monotherapy displayed no antimicrobial activity against any of the strains assessed during 24 h treatment, which was indicated by a time-kill curve pattern similar to the untreated control (Figure 1).
The current findings suggest that the synergy between polymyxin B and the CBD most likely arises from bioavailability synergy [42], which means that polymyxins permeabilize the Gram-negative OM and thereby allow the entry of CBD into the intracellular compartment to subsequently exert its action on its intracellular targets [36,38].
4. Discussion
To prolong and maximize the clinical efficacy of polymyxins and prevent the emergence of antibiotic resistance, novel polymyxin combination therapy against MDR Gram-negative bacteria such as A. baumannii is desperately needed. Although researchers have shown that polymyxins in combination with cannabidiol displayed synergistic killing activity against Gram-negative bacteria, including A. baumannii, they did not perform time-kill assays or investigate the precise mechanisms behind the synergistic killing activity of polymyxins in combination with the cannabidiol against A. baumannii [33,35,36]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to decipher the mechanisms of synergistic killing activity of polymyxins and synthetic cannabidiol combination therapy against A. baumannii using untargeted metabolomics.
The checkerboard and time-kill assays demonstrated synergistic bacterial killing by polymyxins plus cannabidiol treatment against a panel of MDR Gram-negative pathogens (A. baumannii, K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa) (Figure 1; Table 1). The metabolomics study showed that polymyxin B–cannabidiol treatment caused a greater perturbation in A. baumannii ATCC 19606 metabolome compared to monotherapies, particularly at the later time exposure (4 h). The most significant findings for integrating pathway enrichment analysis include (i) dysregulation in bacterial cell envelope biogenesis, (ii) inhibition of DNA and RNA metabolism, as reflected by the major perturbation of purine and pyrimidine metabolism, and (iii) perturbation of peptide metabolism.
Polymyxins exert primary antibacterial killing activity by disorganizing the bacterial OM [9,52]. Unsurprisingly, at 1 h, polymyxin B caused a marked suppression, albeit far less compared to that achieved with the combination, in fatty acids, glycerophospholipids metabolism as well as key lipids of OM such as trans-hexadec-2-enoyl-CoA, sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine and sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (Figure 2A,B). Our findings agreed with previous metabolomics and transcriptomics studies that showed that A. baumannii metabolites and genes involved primarily in bacterial OM biosynthesis and phospholipid trafficking experienced a significant alteration at 1 h polymyxin posttreatment [19,53]. However, the impact from polymyxin B monotherapy on levels of essential bacterial membrane lipids was minimal at 4 h, suggesting that polymyxin resistance may occur within 4 h after polymyxin B monotherapy. The antimicrobial effect of cannabidiol has recently gained great attention; however, the precise mode of action is still unclear [34,35,36,37,38]. It was found that cannabidiol inhibited membrane lipid synthesis of S. aureus [38]. This evidence is in line with our findings that showed the inhibitory impact of cannabidiol on levels of essential bacterial membrane lipids at 1 h, including phosphatidylethanolamine, sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine and 1-hexadecanoyl-2-sn-glycero-3-phosphate (Figure 2A). Nevertheless, this effect disappeared at the later time exposure of 4 h. Promisingly, the combination caused extensive perturbations (largely at 1 h and to a lesser extent at 4 h) in fatty acids and glycerophospholipids (Figure 2A,B). There has been growing interest in fatty acid biosynthesis as a major target for antibiotic development, for instance, the newly discovered fatty acid elongation inhibitors, platensimycin and platencin [54]. A greater reduction in the levels of key bacterial membrane lipids (e.g., phosphatidylethanolamine, 1,2-diacyl-sn-glycerol 3-phosphate (phosphatidic acid), sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine and sn-glycerol 3-phosphate) was observed after the combination treatment at both time points (1 and 4 h) (Figure 2A,B). In Gram-negative bacteria, phosphatidylethanolamine accounts for 70–80% of total membrane lipids, which are synthesized on the cytoplasmic side of the inner membrane [55,56]. It has been found that an alteration in the levels of phosphatidylethanolamine leads to critically compromised cell integrity and ultimately cell death [44]. Sn-glycerol 3-phosphate is an essential precursor required for the formation of membrane phospholipids; it undergoes acylation at the 1-position to form lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), and then a second acylation step produces phosphatidic acid (PA), the principal component in the synthesis of bacterial membrane glycerolipids [57]. Targeting phosphatidic acid synthesis in Gram-negative bacteria might offer a new and effective strategy to develop novel antibacterial therapeutics [46].
Importantly, our study is the first to report that combining polymyxin B with cannabidiol caused a marked suppression in the components of peptidoglycan and LPS biogenesis at 1 h, including UDP-MurNAc-L-Ala-ƴ-D-Glu-m-Dap-D-Ala-D-Ala and D-alanyl-D-alanine (Supplementary Figure S4). This influence may have arisen from inhibition of amino-sugar and nucleotide-sugar metabolism and the pentose phosphate pathway, which are key sources of precursors for peptidoglycan and LPS synthesis. This was manifested by a significant decline in the levels of UDP-GlcNAc, D-sedoheptulose 7-phosphate and Ru5P after combination treatment (Supplementary Figure S4). UDP-GlcNAc plays a pivotal role as an amino sugar donor in several transferase reactions in the biosynthesis of peptidoglycan, the core lipid A components of the LPS, and certain O-antigens of Gram-negative bacteria [58,59]. The synthesis of KDO, an essential residue of the LPS inner core, is initiated by the enzyme D-arabinose-5-phosphate isomerase (API), which regulates the reversible isomerization of D-ribulose 5-phosphate (Ru5P) to D-arabinose-5-phosphate, a precursor of 3-deoxy-D-manno-octulosonate [60]. It is important to note that the combination treatment remained effective in disorganizing the bacterial envelope formation at 4 h, in which more perturbations in peptidoglycan and LPS biosynthesis were most prominent (Figure 3A,B). Intriguingly, the combination treatment caused a profound decrease in the abundance of undecaprenyl phosphate (C55-P), also known as bactoprenol, a sugar carrier lipid that mediates the biosynthesis of bacterial extracellular polysaccharides such as cell wall peptidoglycan and LPS [61,62], at 4 h (Figure 3A,B). It has been proposed that bactoprenol is a potential novel target for new antibacterial agents [63,64].
Consistent with our previous results, it was not unusual that polymyxin B monotherapy caused a significant alteration, though less intense compared to the combination, in the main pathways involved in the cell envelope assembly, including peptidoglycan and LPS biosynthesis at both time points (1 and 4 h) (Figure 3A,B) [17,18,19]. Remarkably, pathway analysis also showed that despite being a non-antibiotic, cannabidiol reduced the KDO and UDP-GlcNAc levels at 4 h (Figure 3B). Hence, taking data from all of the above-mentioned studies together, a possible mechanism of synergistic killing by the polymyxin B–cannabidiol combination is strongly related to the suppression of amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism and PPP and subsequent peptidoglycan and LPS biosynthesis, which eventually leads to bacterial membrane structure deformity.
Apart from its disruptive impact on the bacterial membrane, the combination therapy produced profound changes in the nucleotide pool of A. baumannii ATCC 19606 at both time exposures (1 and 4 h); however, the maximum effect on the nucleotide pool was at 4 h (Figure 4A,B). The perturbed nucleotides were mainly those related to purine and pyrimidine metabolism (e.g., ATP, ADP, UDP and GMP), which ultimately impacted DNA and RNA synthesis. Nucleotide metabolism such as purine metabolism is actively involved in antibiotic efficacy and lethality [65,66]. It has been found that dysregulation in purine metabolism can alter antibiotic lethality; this has been manifested by an increase in the bacterial killing activity of gentamicin following genetic deletion of enzymes involved in purine metabolism [65]. Given the significant alteration of the majority of the nucleotides involved in purine and pyrimidine, it is highly likely that the combination treatment compromised DNA and RNA biosynthesis in A. baumannii. Notably, it has been previously reported that polymyxins were able to dysregulate the nucleotide pool of different Gram-negative pathogens such as A. baumannii, K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa [50,64,65]. A recent study using radiolabeled macromolecular synthesis assays revealed the ability of cannabidiol to inhibit DNA, RNA and protein synthesis in S. aureus [38]. In line with these findings, polymyxin B and cannabidiol monotherapies demonstrated significant perturbations, albeit to a lesser extent compared to their combination, in the levels of nucleotides at 1 h, which then faded away at 4 h (Figure 4A,B). In combination, our findings showed polymyxin B and cannabidiol additionally affected peptide metabolism, which most likely led to inhibition of protein synthesis in A. baumannii.
Overall, the novel findings from this study are that polymyxin B monotherapy produces significant changes in multiple cellular metabolic pathways of cell envelope biogenesis, all of which were further disorganized by adding cannabidiol. Furthermore, the combination therapy greatly perturbed the nucleotide and peptide pools, suggesting a unique mechanism (non-bacterial membrane involvement) of synergistic killing for the polymyxin B–cannabidiol treatment. The current findings also showed that cannabidiol affects LPS, DNA, and lipid biosynthesis. The study highlights the importance of elucidating the complex and dynamic interactions of multiple cellular metabolic pathways due to antibiotic–nonantibiotic treatment. Such findings will aid in the understanding of the most likely mechanisms behind the killing synergy and ultimately facilitate future repurposing of cannabidiol as an antimicrobial agent in combination with polymyxins.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by a research grant from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institute of Health (R01 AI146241, GR, and TV). JL is an Australian National Health Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Principal Research Fellow. J.L. is an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Principal Research Fellow, and T.V. is an Australian NHMRC Industry Career Development Level 2 Research Fellow. The content is solely the authors’ responsibility and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases or the National Institute of Health.
Appendix Group
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pharmaceutics14040786/s1, Figure S1: Total acquired metabolites and the proportion of each metabolite classes; Table S1: Data precision of individual samples represented as the median relative standard deviation (RSD) for all metabolites of A. baumannii ATCC 19606 based on all biological replicates (n = 4) of each group (n = 8 for technical replicates of PBQCs); Figure S2: (A) PCA plots for metabolite levels from A. baumannii ATCC 19606 samples treated with polymyxin B (PMB), cannabidiol (CBD), and their combination (COM) at 1 and 4 h. Each data set represents a total of 8 samples of 4 biological replicates of each condition. Purple = control; Cyan = polymyxin B (PMB); Red = cannabidiol (CBD); Green = combination. (B) Heatmap profiles of A. baumannii ATCC 19606 with hierarchical clustering of all identified metabolites after treatment with polymyxin B (PMB), cannabidiol (CBD), and their combination (COM) at 1 and 4 h; Figure S3: (A) Volcano plots show the total number of significant metabolites after antibiotic monotherapy and combination treatment of A. baumannii ATCC 19606 at 1 and 4 h. (B) The summary of significantly changed metabolites of A. baumannii ATCC 19606 from different categories following PMB and CBD monotherapies and their combination treatment at 1 and 4 h. Changes (≥0.59-log2-fold, p ≤ 0.05). (C) Venn diagrams showing the number of metabolites significantly affected by each treatment for A. baumannii ATCC 19606 at 1 and 4. Significant metabolites were selected with (≥0.59-log2-fold, p ≤ 0.05); Figure S4: The bar charts of significantly impacted metabolites of amino-sugar and nucleotide-sugar metabolism, PPP and downstream peptidoglycan and LPS biosynthesis for A. baumannii ATCC 19606 treated with polymyxin B (PMB) or cannabidiol (CBD) monotherapy and the combination (COM) after 1h exposure (≥1.0-log2-fold, p ≤ 0.05); Figure S5: The fold change charts of significantly impacted metabolites of peptides metabolism for A. baumannii ATCC 19606 treated with polymyxin B (PMB) or cannabidiol (CBD) monotherapy and the combination (COM) after 1 and 4h exposure (≥1.0-log2-fold, p ≤ 0.05).
Funding
G.G.R.: T.V. and J.L. are supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, award number R01AI146241. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
All data available are reported in the article.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
| MIC (mg/L) | FIC Index | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Species | Polymyxin-Susceptible Isolates | PMB | CBD | FIC PMB | FIC CBD | PMB-CBD |
| Acinetobacter baumannii | ATCC 17978 | 0.25 | >64 | 0.0625 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
| ATCC 19606 | 1 | >64 | 0.0625 | 0.5 | 0.062 | |
| FADDI-AB146 | 1 | >64 | 0.125 | 0.5 | 0.12 | |
| FADDI-AB150 | 2 | >64 | 0.0625 | 0.5 | 0.03 | |
| FADDI-AB151 | 2 | >64 | 0.0625 | 0.25 | 0.03 | |
| Polymyxin-resistant isolates | ||||||
| FADDI-AB144 | 8 | >64 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.06 | |
| FADDI-AB148 | 8 | >64 | 0.25 | 1 | 0.03 | |
| FADDI-AB143 | 16 | >64 | 0.5 | 2 | 0.04 | |
| FADDI-AB065 | 64 | 0.5 | 64 | 0.5 | 2.00 | |
| FADDI-AB060 | 128 | >64 | 4 | 2 | 0.04 | |
| Klebsiella pneumoniae | Polymyxin-susceptible isolates | |||||
| Kp BM1 | 0.25 | >64 | 0.0625 | 0.5 | 0.25 | |
| FADDI-KP002 | 0.5 | >64 | 0.0625 | 1 | 0.13 | |
| FADDI-KP069 | 0.5 | >64 | 0.0625 | 4 | 0.15 | |
| KPATCC13883 | 0.5 | >64 | 0.0625 | 2 | 0.14 | |
| ATCC 700721 | 0.5 | >64 | 0.125 | 2 | 0.26 | |
| FADDI-KP005 | 1 | >64 | 0.125 | 1 | 0.13 | |
| Polymyxin-resistant isolates | ||||||
| FADDI-KP003 | 32 | >64 | 4 | 4 | 0.15 | |
| FADDI-KP012 | 32 | >64 | 2 | 4 | 0.09 | |
| FADDI-KP070 | 64 | >64 | 2 | 4 | 0.06 | |
| KPATCC13883R | 128 | >64 | 8 | 4 | 0.09 | |
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa | Polymyxin-susceptible isolates | |||||
| FADDI-PA019 ma | 1 | >64 | 0.5 | 4 | 0.53 | |
| FADDI-PA007 n/mb | 1 | >64 | 0.25 | 1 | 0.25 | |
| FADDI-PA020 m | 2 | >64 | 0.25 | 8 | 0.18 | |
| Polymyxin-resistant isolates | ||||||
| FADDI-PA006 m | 8 | >64 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.06 | |
| FADDI-PA066 n/m | 32 | >64 | 2 | 4 | 0.04 | |
| FADDI-PA070 n/m | 128 | >64 | 2 | 2 | 0.02 | |
| FADDI-PA064 n/m | 128 | >64 | 8 | 8 | 0.12 | |