Study of the Metabolic Profiles of “Indazole-3-Carboxamide” and “Isatin Acyl Hydrazone” (OXIZID) Synthetic Cannabinoids in a Human Liver Microsome Model Using UHPLC-QE Orbitrap MS
Hebei Key Laboratory of Forensic Medicine, Collaborative Innovation Center of Forensic Medical Molecular Identification, Research Unit of Digestive Tract Microecosystem Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Forensic Medicine, Hebei Medical University, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050017, China
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Forensic Medicine, Shanghai Forensic Science Platform, Key Laboratory of Judicial Expertise, Department of Forensic Toxicology, Academy of Forensic Science, Ministry of Justice, Shanghai 200063, China
Abstract
Unregulated core structures, “isatin acyl hydrazones” (OXIZIDs), have quietly appeared on the market since China legislated to ban seven general core scaffolds of synthetic cannabinoids (SCs). The fast evolution of SCs presents clinical and forensic toxicologists with challenges. Due to extensive metabolism, the parent compounds are barely detectable in urine. Therefore, studies on the metabolism of SCs are essential to facilitate their detection in biological matrices. The aim of the present study was to elucidate the metabolism of two cores, “indazole-3-carboxamide” (e.g., ADB-BUTINACA) and “isatin acyl hydrazone” (e.g., BZO-HEXOXIZID). The in vitro phase I and phase II metabolism of these six SCs was investigated by incubating 10 mg/mL pooled human liver microsomes with co-substrates for 3 h at 37 °C, and then analyzing the reaction mixture using ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole/electrostatic field orbitrap mass spectrometry. In total, 9 to 34 metabolites were detected for each SC, and the major biotransformations were hydroxylation, dihydrodiol formation (MDMB-4en-PINACA and BZO-4en-POXIZID), oxidative defluorination (5-fluoro BZO-POXIZID), hydrogenation, hydrolysis, dehydrogenation, oxidate transformation to ketone and carboxylate, N-dealkylation, and glucuronidation. Comparing our results with previous studies, the parent drugs and SC metabolites formed via hydrogenation, carboxylation, ketone formation, and oxidative defluorination were identified as suitable biomarkers.
Untitled section
Keywords: metabolism, pooled human liver microsome, UHPLC-QE Orbitrap MS, NPS, OXIZIDs, synthetic cannabinoid
Article notes
Untitled section
Received 2023 Mar 29; Revised 2023 Apr 15; Accepted 2023 Apr 17; Collection date 2023 Apr.
1. Introduction
Reports published by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime indicate that the number of new psychoactive substances (NPS) found on global drug markets has now stabilized at around 550 per year, confirming that their abuse is becoming a difficult drug issue worldwide [1]. Among the NPS available globally, synthetic cannabinoids (SCs) remain one of the most prevalent classes of NPS [2]. The SCs mimic and surpass the effects of (-)-trans-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), and most of them have high potency and affinity for the human cannabinoid receptor subtype-1 (CB1) and subtype-2 (CB2) [3,4].
Many SCs have been associated with psychosis, hallucinations, seizures, respiratory failure, cardiovascular effects, coma, and even death [5,6,7]. Various countries, including China, now enforce strict legal controls over SCs. Indeed, in July 2021, China put into effect a new generic legislation banning SCs containing one of seven general core scaffolds. However, these regulations now appear to have driven manufacturers to synthesize SCs with alternative core structures. This trend is particularly evident by the recent emergence of OXIZIDs, a new class of NPS that has emerged in the recreational drug market in several countries, particularly the United States, China, and Singapore [8].
The introduction of OXIZIDs as a new class of non-scheduled compounds has led to the anticipation of an increasing number of OXIZID-type substances in the near future [9]. The present study concentrates on four specific OXIZIDs, namely BZO-HEXOXIZID, BZO-POXIZID, BZO-4en-POXIZID, and 5-fluoro BZO-POXIZID, which belong to the N-alkyl isatin acyl hydrazone structural class of compounds due to their feature “isatin acyl hydrazone” core. This core differs from the general SC structures regulated in revised Chinese legislation, thereby sparing OXIZIDs from legal control. The two other substances, ADB-BUTINACA and MDMB-4en-PINACA, have an “indazole-3-carboxamide” core, are under Chinese legal control, and may also be showing a popular trend in abuse in China, according to the research carried out by Zhou et al. (Figure 1) [10].
Confirmation of the consumption of NPS, including SCs, requires the development of targeted methods for those compounds. Moreover, due to the limited half-life of NPS in blood and serum and their extensive metabolism, the proof of consumption often relies on the detection of metabolites in urine, a matrix characterized by a wider detection window [11,12]. In fact, SCs undergo such extensive biotransformation after administration that little to no unchanged parent drug is found in human urine. Certain SC metabolites, such as monohydroxylated species, have been reported to retain some biological activity and to cross the blood–brain barrier and bind to the CB1 and CB2 receptors [13,14,15]. Hydroxylated metabolites have been suggested for use as in vivo markers to identify several SCs in clinical and forensic urine samples. Therefore, metabolic studies are critical for confirming SC substance use.
Due to the limited access to samples from subjects with known or suspected drug intake, as well as uncertainties related to which drug has been ingested, in vitro model systems of drug metabolism have emerged as a valuable tool. Several studies have shown comparable metabolic profiles between in vitro human liver microsome (HLM) or human hepatocyte assays and human in vivo urine samples [16,17,18,19]. Previous studies have examined the metabolic profiles of ADB-BUTINACA and MDMB-4en-PINACA after in vitro or in vivo incubation, and some differences have been reported between them [20,21,22,23,24]. The metabolic profiles of BZO-HEXOXIZID, BZO-POXIZID, and 5-fluoro BZO-POXIZID have been explored, with 12–16 metabolites reported for each; however, none have been reported for BZO-4en-POXIZID [25].
The aim of the present study was to elucidate the main in vitro phase I and phase II metabolites of ADB-BUTINACA, MDMB-4en-PINACA, BZO-HEXOXIZID, BZO-POXIZID, 5-fluoro BZO-POXIZID, and BZO-4en-POXIZID, with a focus on the analytical differentiation and interpretation of the metabolites and the identification of major-specific biomarkers for intake. A further aim was to explore the metabolic rules of the “isatin acyl hydrazone” and “indazole-3-carboxamide” cores (Figure 1). The structures of the six SCs and their metabolites were determined using ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole/electrostatic field orbitrap mass spectrometry (UHPLC-QE Orbitrap MS).
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Chemicals and Reagents
ADB-BUTINACA [N-(1-amino-3,3-dimethyl-1-oxobutan-2-yl)−1-butyl-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide] (≥98%), MDMB-4en-PINACA [methyl 3,3-dimethyl-2-(1-(pent-4-en-1-yl)−1H-indazole-3-carboxamido) butanoate] (≥98%), BZO-HEXOXIZID [(Z)-N′-(1-hexyl-2-oxoindolin-3ylidene) benzohydrazide] (≥95%), BZO-POXIZID [(Z)-N′-(1-pentyl-2-oxoindolin-3-ylidene) benzohydrazide] (≥98%), 5F-BZO-POXIZID [(Z)-N′-(1-(5-fluoropentyl)-2-oxoindolin-3-ylidene) benzohydrazide] (≥98%), and BZO-4en-POXIZID [(Z)-N’-(2-oxo-1-(pent-4-en-1-yl) indolin-3-ylidene) benzo hydrazide] (≥95%) were purchased from Cayman Chemical Company (Ann Arbor, MI, USA). Analytical grade methanol and acetonitrile (>99%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA), and formic acid (FA, analytical grade, 98%) was purchased from Fluka (Buchs, Switzerland). Ammonium formate (>99%) was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The 0.1 mol/L phosphate-buffered saline (pH = 7.4), pooled human liver microsomes (pHLMs, protein concentration of 20 mg/mL), nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) regeneration solution A (1.3 mmol/L NADP+, 3.3 mmol/L magnesium chloride, and 3.3 mmol/L glucose-6-phosphate), NADPH regeneration solution B (0.4 U/mL 6-phosphoglucose dehydrogenase and 0.05 mmol/L sodium citrate), and the UGT incubation system (uridine diphosphate glucuronic acid [UDPGA], D-gluconic acid-1,4-lactone, and alamethicin) were purchased from the Huizhi Taikang Pharmaceutical. Technology Co. (Beijing, China). A Millipore AFS-10 water purification system (Billerical, MA, USA) was used to prepare ultrapure water for samples. All analytical compounds were dissolved in methanol at 1 mg/mL concentrations as working solutions.
2.2. Incubation in pHLMs
A 2 μL aliquot of working solution (1 mg/mL) was mixed with 176 μL of phosphate-buffered saline and 10 μL of liver microsomal solution and then pre-incubated for 5 min at 37 °C. The metabolic reaction was initiated by adding 10 μL NADPH regeneration solution A and 2 μL NADPH regeneration solution B. The reaction was allowed to proceed at a constant temperature of 37 °C for 120 min, followed by the addition of 30 μL UGT incubation system reagents (10 μL each of UDPGA, alamethicin, and D-gluconic acid-1,4-lactone). After 60 min, the reaction was terminated by protein precipitation by adding 200 μL ice-cold acetonitrile. The mixture was then centrifuged at 13,500× g for 5 min. The supernatant was evaporated to dryness under a stream of air in an MD200 sample concentrator (ALLSHENG, Hangzhou, China). The residues were reconstituted in 100 μL reagent (95% phase A and 5% phase B) for analysis with the UHPLC-QE-Orbitrap MS system. A blank sample without the six compounds and a negative control sample without pHLMs were also prepared, with the substrate or enzyme replaced with buffer.
2.3. LC-MS Analysis
The samples were separated and analyzed using an UHPLC-QE-Orbitrap MS system comprising a Thermo-Scientific™ Q-Exactive™ quadrupole electrostatic field orbitrap mass spectrometer coupled to an UltiMate 3000 ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) system (both from Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with a heated electrospray ionization (HESI)-II source in the positive ionization mode. The samples were separated with an Agilent Eclipse Plus C18 column (100 × 2.1 mm, 3.5 μm) maintained at 25 °C and a flow rate of 300 μL/min. The mobile phases were mobile phase A (water with 0.1% v/v formic acid) and mobile phase B (acetonitrile with 0.1% v/v formic acid). The following gradient was used: 0–1.0 min, 5% B; 1.0–11.0 min, 5% B–95% B; 11.0–15.5 min, 95% B; 15.5–16.0 min, 95% B–5% B; 16.0–18.0 min, 5% B. The injection volume was 10 μL.
The following HESI-II source conditions were adopted: capillary temperature, 325 °C; auxiliary gas heater temperature, 300 °C; spray voltage, 3.50 kV; auxiliary gas, 15 arbitrary units (AU); and sheath gas, 45 AU. The mass spectrometry analysis was carried out in full-scan (FS) mode to trigger data-dependent acquisition in tandem mass spectrometry (FS-ddMS2) mode. The FS data acquisition was performed with a survey scan from m/z 100 to 1000, and a maximum injection time (IT) of 250 ms. The fragment ions were detected from m/z 50 to 1000 with normalized collision energy (NCE) of 10, 15, and 20 eV. The maximum IT was set to 50 ms. The spectrum data type was centroid, and all mass spectral data were processed using Xcalibur Qual Browser software, version 3.1. The mass deviation allowed was within 5 ppm.
3. Results
All metabolite structures were inferred based on their accurate molecular mass and MS/MS spectra. The interpretations of the mass spectra were based on product ions formed during collision-induced dissociation (CID). The extracted mass chromatograms and metabolites are provided in Supplementary Material (Figures S1–S6). The biotransformation, chemical formula, retention time, measured and exact masses of the protonated molecule, mass error, and peak area are shown in Supplementary Material (Tables S1–S6). The product ion mass spectrum and chemical structures of the studied synthetic cannabinoids and their identified metabolites are listed in Supplementary Material Figure S7–S12. Figure 2 shows the mass spectrum and fragment analysis of A1, a monohydroxylated metabolite of compound ADB-BUTINACA. The proposed metabolic pathways are provided in Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8.
3.1. “Indazole-3-Carboxamide” Synthetic Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists (SCRAs)
3.1.1. Parent Compounds
The LC-MS analysis confirmed that ADB-BUTINACA (m/z 331.2129) and MDMB-4en-PINACA (m/z 358.2125) were both “indazole-3-carboxamide” SCRAs. They both showed the same characteristic fragment ion at m/z 145.0398 for the indazole acylium cation, and the m/z 201.1025 and 213.1022 for the butyl/pentenyl indazole acylium cation. The ions at m/z 286.1916 and 298.1913 could be explained by alpha cleavage of ADB-BUTINACA and MDMB-4en-PINACA, respectively. In addition, the rearrangement reaction of the fragment ion of ADB-BUTINACA at m/z 219.1128 might be explained by an amide cleavage, followed by a nucleophilic attack of the oxygen at imidazole nitrogen in position 2, which is probably activated by the negative effect of the nitrogen in position 1, leading to a seventh ring [26]. The same reaction could explain the fragment ions of m/z 163.0499 and the fragment ions of MDMB-4en-PINACA (m/z 358.2125), m/z 231.1124 [27]. The fragment ions at m/z 69.0699 showed the pentenyl side chain of MDMB-4en-PINACA. These fragment ions were used as the basis for elucidating the metabolite structures.
3.2. “Isatin Acyl Hydrazone” SCRAs
Incubation of BZO-HEXOXIZID, BZO-POXIZID, BZO-4en-POXIZID, and 5-fluoro BZO-POXIZID with pHLMs resulted in the identification of 34 (C1–C34), 30 (D1–D30), 26 (E1–E26), and 24 (F1–F24) phase I and II metabolites, respectively. The metabolites eluted between 5.10 and 11.67 min, with the parent drugs eluting at 11.67, 11.11, 10.53, and 10.01 min, respectively. The metabolites were formed via hydroxylation, dehydrogenation, hydrogenation, amido hydrolysis, N-dealkylation, oxidative defluorination, and glucuronidation, either alone or in combination.
3.2.1. Parent Compounds
Four different substituents distinguished these four structurally similar compounds. The BZO-POXIZID ion (m/z 336.1707, hexyl) was 14 Da (CH4) smaller than the BZO-HEXOXIZID ion (m/z 350.1863, pentyl), whereas the BZO-4en-POXIZID ion (m/z 334.1550, pentenyl) was 2 Da smaller than the BZO-POXIZID ion (m/z 336.1707, pentyl). The 5-fluoro BZO-POXIZID ion (m/z 354.1612, fluoropentyl) contained a fluorine atom. The characteristic fragment ions were found at m/z 145.0396 for the oxoindoline structure formed by nitrogen–nitrogen bond cleavage, at m/z 105.0335 for the benzyl oxonium ion, and at m/z 77.0386 for the phenyl ion. These fragment ions were used as the basis for elucidating the metabolite structures.
3.3. Suggested Biomarkers
We quantified the peak area ratios of the top three metabolites of the six SCs after a 180 min incubation in the pHLM incubation system and then compared the data of the peak area ((Tables S1–S6)). This led us to propose the following metabolites, combined with the parent drugs, as SC biomarkers.
For ADB-BUTINACA, the monohydroxylation (N-butyl chain) (A1), monohydroxylation (t-butyl chain) (A2), and the ADB-BUTINACA acid metabolite (A7) were appropriate biomarkers. The dihydroxylation (pentenyl chain) (B6, B7) and monohydroxylation (indazole ring) (B2) were suggested for MDMB-4en-PINACA. We dispensed with the hydroxylated metabolites with the unreserved ester moiety, as the same metabolites were encountered with ADB-4en-BUTINACA [22].
Due to the overlapping metabolite profiles of the OXIZIDs, we were prudent in selecting biomarkers for each OXIZID. For BZO-HEXOXIZID, the monohydroxylation combined with dehydrogenation (hexyl chain) (C6), monohydroxylation (hexyl chain) (C3), and the ketone metabolites (C11) were suggested. The key Phase I metabolites of BZO-POXIZID and BZO-4en-POXIZID were D6 (monohydroxylation combined with hydrogenation at the pentyl chain), D2 (monohydroxylation at the pentyl chain), D3 (monohydroxylation at the benzene ring of benzoyl), D8 (dihydroxylation at the pentyl chain), E10 (dihydroxylation combined with hydrogenation at the pentenyl chain), E3 (monohydroxylation at the pentenyl chain), and E8 (monohydroxylation at benzene ring of the benzoyl combined with monohydroxylation at the pentenyl chain). The key metabolites of 5-fluoro BZO-POXIZID were F7 (defluorination combined with hydroxylation), F11 (pentanoic acid), F2 (monohydroxylation at the benzene ring of benzoyl), and F1 (monohydroxylation at the benzene ring of benzoyl).
The four OXIZID SCs also contained copious overlapping metabolites (D5–6/E1–3, D7–8/E10, D1–2/E5–6/F6–7), an awkward situation that is frequently encountered in analysis. Therefore, when determining biomarkers, researchers often use the parent drug and several special metabolites as markers to ensure the accuracy of identification [30]. Here, we suggested that the SCs could not be distinguished by their metabolites but instead by their parent compounds. To distinguish 5-fluoro BZO-POXIZID from BZO-POXIZID and BZO-4en-POXIZID, the monohydroxylation products (fluoropentyl chain) (F1–2) were suggested as biomarkers.
4. Discussion
The results presented here showed that the biotransformation pathways of the six SCs were the same as those of other SCs with similar structures, with the metabolic sites frequently occurring at the alkyl, alkenyl, and fluoropentyl side chains and benzene ring moieties. These findings were also consistent with previously published metabolic products of SCs [31,32,33]. BZO-HEXOXIZID, BZO-POXIZID, and ADB-BUPINACA were straight-chain hydrocarbon analogues with comparable metabolic patterns. The most abundant metabolites generated in vitro, particularly those resulting from oxidative reactions at the N-alkyl chain, concurred with those for the straight-chain SCs JWH-018, JWH-073, and AB-PINAC and included hydroxylation, dehydrogenation, N-dealkylation, ketone formation, and carboxylation [34,35]. In addition, the 5-fluoro BZO-POXIZID with a fluoropentyl group most frequently had the fluorine atom removed at the 5-position, with a subsequent hydroxylation. According to our results, the biotransformation is likeliest to involve oxidation of the terminal fluorine atom to a hydroxyl group, followed by continuous oxidation reactions of the fluoropentyl group of 5-fluoro BZO-POXIZID to obtain valeric acid (F11); this would be consistent with the metabolism rule for a fluoropentyl group reported in the literature [36,37,38,39]. It is worth noting that under the action of hydroxylase, the fluorine atoms might shift to adjacent positions during hydroxylation similar to the NIH shift, which provided a possibility for derivation of the hydroxylation position of F20* [40,41,42].
For MDMB-4en-PINACA and BZO-4en-POXIZID, which have olefinic side chains, the special metabolite was the formation of a dihydrodiol (the oxidation of the double bond of the olefinic side chain) and even a dihydrotriol. This kind of biotransformation commonly occurs in many compounds with similar structures, such as ADB-4en-PINACA and MMB-4en-PINACA, for which the dihydrodiol has been listed as a biomarker to identify ingestion [22,43]. Dihydrodiol formation from metabolism of alkenes via epoxidation was a common biotransformation [44,45]. Epoxidation was catalyzed by cytochrome P450 enzymes, followed by spontaneous hydration of the epoxide or facilitated by epoxide hydrolase [24]. In addition, previous studies had shown that terminal alkene groups could cause cytochrome P450 enzymes inactivation by heme alkylations and have hepatotoxicity. Therefore, carrying out a deep investigation of the relationship between these compounds and cytochrome P450 enzymes was of great significance for understanding drug–drug interaction and toxicity [46,47,48,49]. All six SCs underwent amide hydrolysis, with MDMB-4en-PINACA also including amide hydrolysis combined with monohydroxylation products (B21–23), which were not detected in previous studies. Therefore, we speculated that an amide hydrolysis metabolite should be present at a very low abundance, although information-dependent acquisition (IDA) did not lead to the generation of spectra.
Compared with the literature, we identified few metabolites of ADB-BUPINACA; however, the results indicated several special metabolites, such as an N-butanoic acid metabolite (A6), a hydrolysis product (A7), and a hydroxylated metabolite (A1) [10]. We also provide the first report of the N-alkyl carboxylate metabolite A6 in liver microsomes. We did not detect hydroxylation occurring at the benzene ring of the parent core, which was consistent with the small amount detected and reported in the literature [20]. We did not detect the dihydrodiol products occurring on the benzene ring; however, the research results of Kronstrand et al. and Kavanagh et al. both detected many dihydrodiol metabolites arising from the benzene ring of the parent core after liver cell incubation and in biological samples [22,50]. This indicated that liver microsomes might lack the enzyme of this biotransformation pathway. Similarly, N-C oxidative dehydrogenation metabolites were reported after liver cell incubation, whereas they were not detected by Sia et al. or in the present study. Kavanagh et al. did not detect the metabolites of partial monohydroxylation of the tert-leucine amide [21,22]. The metabolites of MDMB-4en-PINACA, such as the dihydrodiol and the hydroxylated and dehydrogenated metabolites, were mentioned in previous literature [23,24,27]. Unlike previous studies, we identified some ketone metabolites occurring at the pentenyl (B18–19) or the tert-butyl (B15) moieties, as well as special phase II metabolites, including those produced by ester hydrolysis to carboxylic acid and further glucuronidation (B28). These results suggested that we should combine multiple metabolic models to improve the metabolic spectrum of SC compounds. The human liver microsomes have a sufficient variety of metabolic enzymes (especially cytochrome P450 enzymes); meanwhile, hepatocytes are also widely used in drug metabolism because, since they contain more complete enzymes and cofactors, such as aldehyde oxidase (AO), xanthine oxidase (XO) and sulfotransferases, a wider variety of metabolites can be identified [51,52,53]. This study is the first to report the hydrolysis of the MDMB-4en-PINACA ester to butyrate in liver microsomes.
Overall, 12–16 metabolites were previously identified for three OXIZIDs (BZO-HEXOXIZID, BZO-POXIZID, and 5F-BZO-POXIZID) by Lee et al. [25]. The major metabolic pathways were consistent with our findings, and the detected compounds included hydroxylated, ketonic, carboxylated, amide-hydroxylated, and N-dealkylated metabolites. Our study indicated that hydroxylation occurred more frequently at the N-alkyl moiety than at the benzene ring, while the F7 (terminal fluorine atom was oxidized to a hydroxyl group) of 5F-BZO-POXIZID was the most frequently modified group, consistent with some other research results for 5F-AB-PINACA, 5F-MN-18, and MAM-2201 [34,39,54]. We considered that C5–7 and D5–6 represented oxidative dehydrogenation combined with hydroxylation (346.1554 and 332.1392 resulting from hydroxyl dehydration), but H11, H13, P8, and P10 were identified as ketone formations by Lee et al. [25], although they only provided one fragment ion. In addition, we did not detect H8 (hydroxylation + ketone) reported by Lee et al. [25], although we did identify the metabolites (C24–26) of dihydroxylation combined with dehydrogenation after hydrolysis of BZO-HEXOXIZID. In view of these discrepancies, we recommend further research to confirm the structures of these SCs.
Unlike the research conducted by Lee et al. [25], for each of the four OXIZIDs, we identified the hydrolysis products and the metabolites that undergo further biotransformation after hydrolysis, which was a common fate of compounds with amide bonds. In our study, many two-phase metabolites and trihydroxylation products were also indicated. In addition, for BZO-POXIZID and 5F-BZO-POXIZID, we identified a metabolite arising from N-dealkylation followed by hydroxylation. For some metabolites, the report by Lee et al. [25] failed to provide detailed ionic fragments; however, we carried out detailed fragment structure assignments, which were of great significance for structure inference. We did not identify the metabolites that occurred in the maternal nucleus, and our results did not identify the metabolites of the OXIZID maternal nucleus. Lee et al. [25] indicated that only one hydroxylated metabolite occurred at the maternal nucleus, but was not present in their urine sample. In future studies, researchers could use other metabolic models to confirm whether this maternal core structure is prone to biotransformation.
Deventer et al. [9] found that BZO-HEXOXIZID, BZO-POXIZID, BZO-4en-POXIZID, and 5-fluoro BZO-POXIZID had different binding affinities for CB1 and CB2. BZO-HEXOXIZID, with an N-hexyl group, had the lowest potency and efficacy, followed by BZO-4en-POXIZID with an N-pentenyl group. The pentyl and fluoropentyl analogs BZO-POXIZID and 5F-BZO-POXIZID exhibited higher but quite similar potencies. BZO-POXIZID and 5F-BZO-POXIZID, with pentyl and fluoropentyl groups, respectively, exhibiting higher but quite similar potencies. All compounds examined in this study underwent C-N bond cleavage (N-dealkylation, etc.), whereas, unlike the other two OXIZIDs, BZO-POXIZID and 5-fluoro BZO-POXIZID underwent N-dealkylation combined with hydroxylation. In this study, in contrast to the other two SCRAs, the common characteristic metabolite of BZO-POXIZID and 5F-BZO-POXIZID was the product of N-dealkylation combined with hydroxylation occurring at the benzene ring of the parent nucleus, whereas the structures of these four compounds were the same after removing the side chain. We speculated that the difference resulted from the difficulty of C-N bond cleavage, which might be an effect of the enzyme responsible for this reaction.
Other common products of phase II metabolism arose from UDP glucuronic acid combined with hydroxyl or carboxyl groups. After 3 h of incubation with human liver microsomes, the peak areas of A9, D28, and F21–22 (glucose-bound metabolites) were relatively large. We recommend treatment of urine samples with β-glucuronidase to facilitate the detection of Phase I metabolites and reduce false negative results in actual cases [55].
5. Conclusions
Using the same experimental conditions, our study identified and compared the metabolic characteristics of two scaffold types of synthetic cannabinoids: indazole-3-carboxamides and isatin acyl hydrazones. The metabolic spectra of ADB-BUPINACA, MDMB-4en-PINACA, and three OXIZIDs were enhanced, and the metabolites of BZO-4en-POXIZID were identified for the first time.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/metabo13040576/s1, Figure S1: Extracted ion chromatograms of ADB-BUTINACA and its metabolites; Figure S2: Extracted ion chromatograms of MDMB-4en-PINACA and its metabolites; Figure S3: Extracted ion chromatograms of BZO-HEXOXIZID and its metabolites; Figure S4: Extracted ion chromatograms of BZO-POXIZID and its metabolites; Figure S5: Extracted ion chromatograms of BZO-4en-POXIZID and its metabolites; Figure S6: Extracted ion chromatograms of 5-fluoro BZO-POXIZID and its metabolites; Figure S7: Mass spectrometry spectra and fragmentation of ADB-BUTINACA and its metabolites; Figure S8: Mass spectrometry spectra and fragmentation of MDMB-4en-PINACA and its metabolites; Figure S9: Mass spectrometry spectra and fragmentation of BZO-HEXOXIZID and its metabolites; Figure S10: Mass spectrometry spectra and fragmentation of BZO-POXIZID and its metabolites; Figure S11: Mass spectrometry spectra and fragmentation of BZO-4en-POXIZID and its metabolites; Figure S12: Mass spectrometry spectra and fragmentation of 5-fluoro BZO-POXIZID and its metabolites; Table S1: UHPLC-QE-Orbitrap MS data of ADB-BUTINACA and its metabolites; Table S2: UHPLC-QE-Orbitrap MS data of MDMB-4en-PINACA and its metabolites; Table S3: UHPLC-QE-Orbitrap MS data of BZO-HEXOXIZID and its metabolites; Table S4: UHPLC-QE-Orbitrap MS data of BZO-POXIZID and its metabolites; Table S5: UHPLC-QE-Orbitrap MS data of BZO-4en-POXIZID and its metabolites; Table S6: UHPLC-QE-Orbitrap MS data of 5-fluoro BZO-POXIZID and its metabolites.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available in the main article and the supplementary materials.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Funding Statement
The authors are grateful to the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFC3300903), National Natural Science Foundation of China (82271932), Central guidance local science and technology development fund(226Z5601G), the Shanghai Key Laboratory of Forensic Medicine (21DZ2270800) and the Shanghai Forensic Service Platform (19DZ2292700) for their financial support of this study.
Footnotes
Footnote Group
References
Untitled section
References
- 1.World Drug Report 2022: Booklet 4: Drug Market Trends of Cocaine, Amphetamine-Type Stimulants and New Psychoactive Substances. [(accessed on 28 March 2023)]. Available online: https://www.unodc.org/res/wdr2022/MS/WDR22_Booklet_4.pdf.
- 2.Sparkes E., Cairns E.A., Kevin R.C., Lai F., Grafinger K.E., Chen S., Deventer M.H., Ellison R., Boyd R., Martin L.J., et al. Structure–activity relationships of valine, tert-leucine, and phenylalanine amino acid-derived synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists related to ADB-BUTINACA, APP-BUTINACA, and ADB-P7AICA. RSC Med. Chem. 2022;13:156–174. doi: 10.1039/D1MD00242B.
- 3.Potts A.J., Cano C., Thomas S.H.L., Hill S.L. Synthetic Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists: Classification and Nomenclature. Clin. Toxicol. 2020;58:82–98. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2019.1661425.
- 4.Alam R.M., Keating J.J. Adding More “Spice” to the Pot: A Review of the Chemistry and Pharmacology of Newly Emerging Heterocyclic Synthetic Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists. Drug Test. Anal. 2020;12:297–315. doi: 10.1002/dta.2752.
- 5.Manini A.F., Krotulski A.J., Schimmel J., Allen L., Hurd Y.L., Richardson L.D., Vidal K., Logan B.K. Respiratory Failure in Confirmed Synthetic Cannabinoid Overdose. Clin. Toxicol. 2022;60:524–526. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2021.1975734.
- 6.Labay L.M., Caruso J.L., Gilson T.P., Phipps R.J., Knight L.D., Lemos N.P., McIntyre I.M., Stoppacher R., Tormos L.M., Wiens A.L., et al. Synthetic Cannabinoid Drug Use as a Cause or Contributory Cause of Death. Forensic Sci. Int. 2016;260:31–39. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.12.046.
- 7.Kourouni I., Mourad B., Khouli H., Shapiro J.M., Mathew J.P. Critical Illness Secondary to Synthetic Cannabinoid Ingestion. JAMA Netw. Open. 2020;3:e208516. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.8516.
- 8.Liu C.M., Hua Z.D., Jia W., Li T. Identification of AD-18, 5F-MDA-19, and Pentyl MDA-19 in Seized Materials after the Class-Wide Ban of Synthetic Cannabinoids in China. Drug Test. Anal. 2022;14:307–316. doi: 10.1002/dta.3185.
- 9.Deventer M.H., Uytfanghe K.V., Vinckier I.M.J., Reniero F., Guillou C., Stove C.P. Cannabinoid Receptor Activation Potential of the Next Generation, Generic Ban Evading OXIZID Synthetic Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists. Drug Test. Anal. 2022;14:1565–1575. doi: 10.1002/dta.3283.
- 10.Zhou L., Shen M., Shen B., Chen H., Wang X., Deng H., Xiang P., Shi Y. Application of a UPLC-MS/MS method for quantitative analysis of 29 synthetic cannabinoids and their metabolites, such as ADB-BUTINACA and MDMB-4en-PINACA in human hair in real cases. Forensic Sci. Int. 2022;331:111139. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.111139.
- 11.Diao X., Huestis M.A. New Synthetic Cannabinoids Metabolism and Strategies to Best Identify Optimal Marker Metabolites. Front. Chem. 2019;7:109. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2019.00109.
- 12.Franz F., Jechle H., Wilde M., Angerer V., Huppertz L.M., Longworth M., Kassiou M., Jung M., Auwärter V. Structure-Metabolism Relationships of Valine and Tert-Leucine-Derived Synthetic Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists: A Systematic Comparison of the in Vitro Phase I Metabolism Using Pooled Human Liver Microsomes and High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry. Forensic Toxicol. 2019;37:316–329. doi: 10.1007/s11419-018-00462-x.
- 13.Rajasekaran M., Brents L.K., Franks L.N., Moran J.H., Prather P.L. Human metabolites of synthetic cannabinoids JWH-018 and JWH-073 bind with high affinity and act as potent agonists at cannabinoid type-2 receptors. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2013;269:100–108. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2013.03.012.
- 14.Gamage T.F., Farquhar C.E., McKinnie R.J., Kevin R.C., McGregor I.S., Trudell M.L., Wiley J.L., Thomas B.F. Synthetic Cannabinoid Hydroxypentyl Metabolites Retain Efficacy at Human Cannabinoid Receptors. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2019;368:414–422. doi: 10.1124/jpet.118.254425.
- 15.Tai S., Fantegrossi W.E. Pharmacological and Toxicological Effects of Synthetic Cannabinoids and Their Metabolites. Curr. Top. Behav. Neurosci. 2017;32:249–262. doi: 10.1007/7854_2016_60.
- 16.Florian F., Angerer V., Moosmann B., Auwärter V. Phase I metabolism of the highly potent synthetic cannabinoid MDMB-CHMICA and detection in human urine samples. Drug Test. Anal. 2017;9:744–753. doi: 10.1002/dta.2049.
- 17.Mogler L., Wilde M., Huppertz L.M., Weinfurtner G., Franz F., Auwärter V. Phase I metabolism of the recently emerged synthetic cannabinoid CUMYL-PEGACLONE and detection in human urine samples. Drug Test. Anal. 2018;10:886–891. doi: 10.1002/dta.2352.
- 18.Mogler L., Franz F., Wilde M., Huppertz L.M., Halter S., Angerer V., Moosmann B., Auwärter V. Phase I metabolism of the carbazole-derived synthetic cannabinoids EG-018, EG-2201, and MDMB-CHMCZCA and detection in human urine samples. Drug Test. Anal. 2018;10:1417–1429. doi: 10.1002/dta.2398.
- 19.Davidsen A.B., Mardal M., Linnet K. In Vitro Metabolism and Hepatic Intrinsic Clearance of the Synthetic Cannabinoid Receptor Agonist JWH-122 and Its Four ω-Halogenated Analogues. AAPS J. 2019;21:63. doi: 10.1208/s12248-019-0338-6.
- 20.Sia C.H., Wang Z., Goh E.M.L., Tan Y.L., Fong C.Y., Moy H.Y., Chan E.C.Y. Urinary Metabolite Biomarkers for the Detection of Synthetic Cannabinoid ADB-BUTINACA Abuse. Clin. Chem. 2021;67:1534–1544. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvab134.
- 21.Kavanagh P., Pechnikov A., Nikolaev I., Dowling G., Kolosova M., Grigoryev A. Detection of ADB-BUTINACA Metabolites in Human Urine, Blood, Kidney and Liver. J. Anal. Toxicol. 2021;46:641–650. doi: 10.1093/jat/bkab088.
- 22.Kronstrand R., Norman C., Vikingsson S., Biemans A., Crespo B.V., Edwards D., Fletcher D., Gilbert N., Persson M., Reid R., et al. The metabolism of the synthetic cannabinoids ADB-BUTINACA and ADB-4en-PINACA and their detection in forensic toxicology casework and infused papers seized in prisons. Drug Test. Anal. 2022;14:634–652. doi: 10.1002/dta.3203.
- 23.Watanabe S., Vikingsson S., Åstrand A., Gréen H., Kronstrand R. Biotransformation of the New Synthetic Cannabinoid with an Alkene, MDMB-4en-PINACA, by Human Hepatocytes, Human Liver Microsomes, and Human Urine and Blood. AAPS J. 2019;22:13. doi: 10.1208/s12248-019-0381-3.
- 24.Gu K., Qin S., Zhang Y., Zhang W., Xin G., Shi B., Wang J., Wang Y., Lu J. Metabolic profiles and screening tactics for MDMB-4en-PINACA in human urine and serum samples. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2020;220:114985. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2022.114985.
- 25.Lee K.Z.H., Wang Z., Fong C.Y., Goh E.M.L., Moy H.Y., Chan E.C.Y. Identification of Optimal Urinary Biomarkers of Synthetic Cannabinoids BZO-HEXOXIZID, BZO-POXIZID, 5F-BZO-POXIZID, and BZO-CHMOXIZID for Illicit Abuse Monitoring. Clin. Chem. 2022;68:1436–1448. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvac138.
- 26.Richter L.H.J., Maurer H.H., Meyer M.R. Metabolic fate of the new synthetic cannabinoid 7’N-5F-ADB in rat, human, and pooled human S9 studied by means of hyphenated high-resolution mass spectrometry. Drug Test. Anal. 2019;11:305–317. doi: 10.1002/dta.2493.
- 27.Ozturk Y.E., Yeter O. In Vitro Phase I Metabolism of the Recently Emerged Synthetic MDMB-4en-PINACA and its Detection in Human Urine Samples. J. Anal. Toxicol. 2021;44:976–984. doi: 10.1093/jat/bkaa017.
- 28.Guengerich F.P. Common and uncommon cytochrome P450 reactions related to metabolism and chemical toxicity. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2001;14:611–650. doi: 10.1021/tx0002583.
- 29.Guengerich F.P. Mechanisms of Cytochrome P450-Catalyzed Oxidations. ACS Catal. 2018;8:10964–10976. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.8b03401.
- 30.Staeheli S.N., Poetzsch M., Veloso V.P., Bovens M., Bissig C., Steuer A.E., Kraemer T. In vitro metabolism of the synthetic cannabinoids CUMYL-PINACA, 5F-CUMYL-PINACA, CUMYL-4CN-BINACA, 5F-CUMYL-P7AICA and CUMYL-4CN-B7AICA. Drug Test. Anal. 2018;10:148–157. doi: 10.1002/dta.2298.
- 31.Alves V.L., Goncalves J.L., Aguiar J., Teixeira H.M., Camara J.S. The Synthetic Cannabinoids Phenomenon: From Structure to Toxicological Properties. A Review. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 2020;50:359–382. doi: 10.1080/10408444.2020.1762539.
- 32.Fan Y., Zong X., Liu J., Ke X., Huang Z., Xu Y. Development of a Fragmentation Pattern of Synthetic Cannabinoids Based on Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry in Positive Ion Mode to Screen Synthetic Cannabinoids in Illicit Products. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2021;193:113723. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2020.113723.
- 33.Safont D.F., Mardal M., Noble C., Cannaert A., Stove C.P., Sancho J.V., Linnet K., Hernández F., Ibáñez M. Comprehensive investigation on synthetic cannabinoids: Metabolic behavior and potency testing, using 5F-APP-PICA and AMB-FUBINACA as model compounds. Drug Test. Anal. 2019;11:1358–1368. doi: 10.1002/dta.2659.
- 34.Wohlfarth A., Castaneto M.S., Zhu M., Pang S., Scheidweiler K.B., Kronstrand R., Huestis M.A. Pentylindole/Pentylindazole Synthetic Cannabinoids and Their 5-Fluoro Analogs Produce Different Primary Metabolites: Metabolite Profiling for AB-PINACA and 5F-AB-PINACA. AAPS J. 2015;17:660–677. doi: 10.1208/s12248-015-9721-0.
- 35.Gambaro V., Arnoldi S., Bellucci S., Casagni E., Acqua L.D., Fumagalli L., Pallavicini M., Roda G., Rusconi C., Valoti E. Characterization of in vitro metabolites of JWH-018, JWH-073 and their 4-methyl derivatives, markers of the abuse of these synthetic cannabinoids. J. Chromatogr. B. 2014;957:68–76. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2014.03.001.
- 36.Mogler L., Franz F., Rentsch D., Angerer V., Weinfurtner G., Longworth M., Banister S.D., Kassiou M., Moosmann B., Auwärter V. Detection of the recently emerged synthetic cannabinoid 5F–MDMB-PICA in ‘legal high’ products and human urine samples. Drug Test. Anal. 2018;10:196–205. doi: 10.1002/dta.2201.
- 37.Apirakkan O., Gavrilovic I., Cowan D.A., Abbate V. In Vitro Phase I Metabolic Profiling of the Synthetic Cannabinoids AM-694, 5F-NNEI, FUB-APINACA, MFUBINAC, and AMB-FUBINACA. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2020;33:1653–1664. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.9b00466.
- 38.Minakata K., Nozawa H., Yamagishi I., Hasegawa K., Saitoh T., Yoshino A., Suzuki M., Kitamoto T., Suzuki O., Watanabe K. Sensitive quantification of 5F-NNEI and characterization of its several metabolites in authentic urine and/or serum specimens obtained from three individuals by LC–QTRAP-MS/MS and high-resolution LC–Orbitrap-MS/MS. Forensic Toxicol. 2018;36:498–505. doi: 10.1007/s11419-018-0429-6.
- 39.Diao X., Carlier J., Zhu M., Huestis M.A. Human Hepatocyte Metabolism of Novel Synthetic Cannabinoids MN-18 and Its 5-Fluoro Analog 5F-MN-18. Clin. Chem. 2017;63:1753–1763. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2017.277152.
- 40.Meuldermans W., Van P.A., Hendrickx J., Lauwers W., Swysen E., Bockx M., Woestenborghs R., Heykants J. Excretion and biotransformation of cisapride in dogs and humans after oral administration. Drug Metab. Dispos. 1988;16:403–409.
- 41.Koerts J., Soffers A.E., Vervoort J., Jager D.A., Rietjens I.M. Occurrence of the NIH shift upon the cytochrome P450-catalyzed in vivo and in vitro aromatic ring hydroxylation of fluorobenzenes. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 1998;11:503–512. doi: 10.1021/tx980053i.
- 42.Montellano P.R.O.D., Nelson S.D. Rearrangement reactions catalyzed by cytochrome P450s. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2011;507:95–110. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2010.10.016.
- 43.Watanabe S., Wu X., Dahlen J., Konradsson P., Vikingsson S., Kronstrand R., Gréen H. Metabolism of MMB022 and identification of dihydrodiol formation in vitro using synthesized standards. Drug Test. Anal. 2020;12:1432–1441. doi: 10.1002/dta.2888.
- 44.Obach R.S. Cytochrome P450-catalyzed metabolism of ezlopitant alkene (CJ-12,458), a pharmacologically active metabolite of ezlopitant: Enzyme kinetics and mechanism of an alkene hydration reaction. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2001;29:1057–1067.
- 45.De Costa K.S., Black S.R., Thomas B.F., Burgess J.P., Mathews J.M. Metabolism and disposition of α-methylstyrene in rats. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2001;29:166–171.
- 46.Montellano P.R.O.D., Mico B.A., Yost G.S. Suicidal inactivation of cytochrome P-450. Formation of a heme-substrate covalent adduct. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1978;83:132–137. doi: 10.1016/0006-291X(78)90407-2.
- 47.Montellano P.R.O.D., Yost G.S., Mico B.A., Dinizo S.E., Correia M.A., Kumbara H. Destruction of cytochrome P-450 by 2-isopropyl-4-pentenamide and methyl 2-isopropyl-4-pentenoate: Mass spectrometric characterization of prosthetic heme adducts and nonparticipation of epoxide metabolites. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1979;197:524–533. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(79)90276-5.
- 48.Montellano P.R.O.D., Kunze K.L., Mico B.A. Destruction of cytochrome P-450 by olefins: N-alkylation of prosthetic heme. Mol. Pharmacol. 1980;18:602–605.
- 49.Davies H.W., Britt S.G., Pohl L.R. Carbon tetrachloride and 2-isopropyl-4-pentenamide-induced inactivation of cytochrome P-450 leads to heme-derived protein adducts. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1986;244:387–392. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(86)90128-1.
- 50.Kavanagh P., Grigoryev A., Krupina N. Detection of metabolites of two synthetic cannabimimetics, MDMB-FUBINACA and ADB-FUBINACA, in authentic human urine specimens by accurate mass LC–MS: A comparison of intersecting metabolic patterns. Forensic Toxicol. 2017;35:284–300. doi: 10.1007/s11419-017-0356-y.
- 51.Di L., Keefer C., Scott D.O., Strelevitz T.J., Chang G., Bi Y.A., Lai Y., Duckworth J., Fenner K., Troutman M.D., et al. Mechanistic insights from comparing intrinsic clearance values between human liver microsomes and hepatocytes to guide drug design. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2012;57:441–448. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2012.06.043.
- 52.Miksits M., Sulyok M., Schuhmacher R., Szekeres T., Jäger W. In-vitro sulfation of piceatannol by human liver cytosol and recombinant sulfotransferases. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2009;61:185–191. doi: 10.1211/jpp.61.02.0007.
- 53.Thum T., Erpenbeck V.J., Moeller J., Hohlfeld J.M., Krug N., Borlak J. Expression of xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes in different lung compartments of smokers and nonsmokers. Environ. Health Perspect. 2006;114:1655–1661. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8861.
- 54.Jang M., Shin I., Yang W., Chang H., Yoo H.H., Lee J., Kim E. Determination of major metabolites of MAM-2201 and JWH-122 in in vitro and in vivo studies to distinguish their intake. Forensic Sci. Int. 2014;244:85–91. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.08.008.
- 55.Janis G.C. Analysis of Synthetic Cannabinoid Metabolites by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Methods Mol. Biol. 2019;1872:137–147. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-8823-5_14.
Associated Data
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available in the main article and the supplementary materials.