N-aryl 2-aryloxyacetamides as a new class of fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) inhibitors
Department of Chemistry, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden;
Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden;
Department of Pharmacy, Uppsala Drug Optimization and Pharmaceutical Profiling platform (UDOPP), Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
Abstract
Fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) is a promising target for the development of drugs to treat neurological diseases. In search of new FAAH inhibitors, we identified 2-(4-cyclohexylphenoxy)-N-(3-(oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)acetamide, 4g, with an IC50 of 2.6 µM as a chemical starting point for the development of potent FAAH inhibitors. Preliminary hit-to-lead optimisation resulted in 2-(4-phenylphenoxy)-N-(3-(oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)acetamide, 4i, with an IC50 of 0.35 µM.
Untitled section
Keywords: Fatty acid amide hydrolase inhibitors; endocannabinoid system; oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridine anilines; 1H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridine anilines
Article notes
Untitled section
Received 2016 Sep 1; Revised 2016 Oct 21; Accepted 2016 Oct 21; Collection date 2017.
Introduction
The endocannabinoid system is involved in a number of physiological effects including control of pain, appetite and cell proliferation1. It contains cannabinoid receptors (CBs) and their stimulating endogenous endocannabinoids anandamide (AEA) and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG), which are synthesised on demand from cell membrane arachidonic acid derivatives2. AEA and 2-AG have a short lifetime due to rapid hydrolysis by the enzymes fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH)3 and monoacylglycerol lipase (MAGL)4, respectively. AEA is the primary substrate for FAAH5; however, it has a wide substrate specificity and can hydrolyse compounds such as N-oleoylethanolamine, a lipid mediator that limits food intake and the anti-inflammatory compound N-palmitoylethanolamide6. Inhibition of FAAH produces elevated levels of AEA in the brain and periphery, as well as potentially beneficial effects in animal models of anxiety and pain7–11.
FAAH is a serine hydrolase enzyme with a unique catalytic triad consisting of two serines (Ser217 and Ser241) and one lysine (Lys142), which makes it distinct from other serine hydrolases. In contrast to other serine hydrolases, FAAH was revealed to hydrolyse amides faster than esters12. A number of FAAH inhibitors has been developed to block the catabolism of AEA13–15. A breakthrough came when inhibitors of a class of N-alkylcarbamic acid O-aryl esters (URB524 and URB597, Figure 1) were found to significantly inhibit the enzyme and to modulate AEA levels in rodents7,16. Those inhibitors blocked FAAH activity through irreversible carbamoylation of the catalytic nucleophile Ser241, where the biphenyl group served as a leaving group17. Additionally, quantum mechanics and molecular modelling simulation suggested that the process of hydrolysis by FAAH was slowed down because of the stabilised hydrogen bond formation between cyclohexylcarbamic ester and active site of the enzyme18. It is also noteworthy that compound URB597 was found to be a selective FAAH inhibitor that did not affect hydrolysis of 2-AG19. Benzoxazole-, oxazolopyridine- and benzimidazole-based compounds have previously shown to efficiently inhibit FAAH13–15. Nevertheless, the crystal structures of FAAH with covalent and non-covalent inhibitors has revealed multiple pockets near the catalytic core, which offers a wide range of binding modes that can be exploited in the design of novel inhibitors20,21. In the present study, we developed synthetic protocols and investigated a series of N-(3-(oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl) and N-(imidazo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl) moieties connected by a 2-aryloxyacetamide to a aliphatic, phenylic or biphenylic hydrophobic “tail” that mimics the arachidonyl moiety of 2-AG.
Materials and methods
General procedure for the synthesis of compounds 2a–f (Scheme 1)
To the polyphosphoric acid (1.5 g/mmol) was added 2-amino-3-hydroxypyridine or 2,3-diaminopyridine (1.0 equiv) and the relevant benzoic acid (1.0 equiv). The mixture was heated to 200 °C and stirred for 6 h. The reaction was cooled slightly and poured into cold water and the mixture was neutralised to pH 8 with 5 M NaOH. The aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl acetate and combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated under vacuum. The solid residue obtained was dissolved in EtOAc and triturated with heptanes. The precipitate formed was filtered and dried under vacuum to obtain the desired compounds 2a–f. Further details are given in the Supporting information.
2-(Oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)aniline (2a)
Yield: 22%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C12H9N3O [M + H]+, 212.08; found 212.12; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ8.50 (dd, 1H, J = 4.92, 1.40 Hz), 8.18 (dd, 1H, J = 8.08, 1.40 Hz), 7.95 (dd, 1H, J = 8.10, 1.46 Hz), 7.44–7.41 (m, 1H), 7.35–7.31 (m, 1H), 7.19 (bs, 2H), 6.94 (dd, 1H, J = 8.38, 0.66 Hz), 6.73–6.69 (m, 1H). 13C (100 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 165.63, 156.00, 150.02, 146.46, 141.65, 133.85, 128.51, 120.54, 118.58, 116.93, 116.08, 106.36.
3-(Oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)aniline (2b)
Yield: 47%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C12H9N3O [M + H]+, 212.08; found 212.12; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ8.53 (dd, 1H, J = 4.88, 1.40 Hz), 8.22 (dd, 1H, J = 8.14, 1.42 Hz), 7.48–7.43 (m, 2H), 7.40–7.37 (m, 1H), 7.27 (t, 1H, J = 7.90 Hz), 6.86–6.83 (m, 1H), 5.55 (bs, 2H). 13C (100 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 166.07, 156.10, 149.96, 146.83, 143.07, 130.33, 126.79, 120.98, 119.31, 118.52, 115.38, 112.73.
4-(Oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)aniline (2c)
Yield: 57%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C12H9N3O [M + H]+, 212.08; found 212.12; 1H NMR (600 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ8.42 (d, 1H, J = 4.86 Hz), 8.07 (d, 1H, J = 8.04 Hz), 7.91 (d, 2H, J = 8.52 Hz), 7.33–7.30 (m, 1H), 6.72 (d, 2H, J = 8.58 Hz), 6.16 (bs, 2H). 13C (100 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 166.66, 156.90, 153.84, 146.09, 142.74, 130.03, 119.70, 118.26, 114.02, 112.24.
2-(1H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)aniline (2d)
Yield: 29%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C12H10N4 [M + H]+, 211.10; found 211.17; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ13.24 (bs, 1H), 8.31 (d, 1H, J = 3.32 Hz), 7.96–7.89 (m, 2H), 7.30–7.16 (m, 4H), 6.84 (dd, 1H, J = 8.28, 0.88 Hz), 6.65 (t, 1H, J = 7.46 Hz). 13C (100 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 154.72, 149.20, 143.79, 131.43, 128.19, 118.15, 116.87, 115.62, 110.22.
3-(1H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)aniline (2e)
Yield: 80%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C12H10N4 [M + H]+, 211.10; found 211.17; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ13.33 (bs, 1H), 8.31 (bs, 1H), 7.97 (bs, 1H), 7.47 (s, 1H), 7.33 (d, 1H, J = 7.32 Hz), 7.23–7.17 (m, 2H), 6.72 (d, 1H, J = 7.20 Hz), 5.33 (bs, 2H). 13C (100 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 153.37, 149.18, 143.57, 135.60, 130.21, 129.48, 125.99, 119.04, 117.93, 116.25, 114.32, 112.08.
4-(1H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)aniline (2f)
Yield: 90%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C12H10N4 [M + H]+, 211.10; found 211.17; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ12.92 (bs, 1H), 8.21 (bs, 1H), 7.92 (d, 2H, J = 8.00 Hz), 7.84 (bs, 1H), 7.13 (bs, 1H), 6.72 (d, 2H, J = 7.92 Hz), 5.58 (bs, 2H). 13C (100 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 153.86, 151.33, 149.63, 143.06, 142.26, 135.97, 128.25, 124.82, 118.01, 117.60, 117.04, 116.50, 113.58.
General procedure for the synthesis of compounds 3b–e (Scheme 1)
To a stirred solution of an alcohol derivative (1.0 equiv) in dry DMF (2 mL/mmol) was added NaH (2.0 equiv) and allowed to stir for 1 h at room temperature. To this mixture, sodium iodoacetate (1.5 equiv) was added and continued stirring for 12 h at room temperature. The reaction mixture was diluted with water and washed out with EtOAc. The aqueous layer was acidified with 1 M HCl and extracted with EtOAc, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated under vacuum to obtain the desired compounds 3b–e.
2-(4-Isopropylphenoxy)acetic acid (3b)
Yield: 65%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C11H14O3 [M-H]+, 193.09; found 193.26; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ7.14 (d, 2H, J = 8.52 Hz), 6.81 (d, 2H, J = 8.76 Hz), 4.61 (s, 2H), 2.87–2.77 (m, 1H), 1.16 (d, 6H, J = 6.92 Hz). 13C (100 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 170.82, 156.30, 141.35, 127.57, 114.65, 64.96, 33.05, 24.55.
2-([1,1′-Biphenyl]-4-yloxy)acetic acid (3c)
Yield: 60%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C14H12O3 [M-H]+, 227.07; found 227.20; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ13.03 (bs, 1H), 7.62–7.58 (m, 4H),7.43 (t, 2H, J = 7.68 Hz), 7.31 (t, 1H, J = 7.36 Hz), 7.00 (d, 2H, J = 8.84 Hz), 4.72 (s, 2H). 13C (100 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 170.67, 157.87, 140.22, 133.53, 129.33, 128.21, 127.26, 126.70, 115.36, 64.99.
2-(4-Cyclohexylphenoxy)acetic acid (3d)
Yield: 63%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C14H18O3 [M-H]+, 233.12; found 233.24; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ12.95 (bs, 1H), 7.12 (d, 2H, J = 8.64 Hz), 6.80 (d, 2H, J = 8.72 Hz), 4.61 (s, 2H), 2.43–2.42 (m, 1H), 1.78–1.67 (m, 5H), 1.41–1.18 (m, 5H). 13C (100 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 170.82, 156.32, 140.63, 127.92, 114.63, 64.95, 43.37, 34.68, 26.87, 26.07.
(E)-2-(hex-2-en-1-yloxy)acetic acid (3e)
Yield: 51%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C8H14O3 [M-H]+, 157.09; found 157.19; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ5.78–5.71 (m, 1H), 5.58–5.50 (m, 1H), 4.09 (s, 2H), 4.06 (dd, 2H, J = 6.50, 0.70 Hz), 2.04 (q, 2H, J = 7.22 Hz), 1.41 (sext, 2H, J = 7.41 Hz), 0.90 (t, 3H, J = 7.38 Hz). 13C (100 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 172.10, 134.36, 126.70, 71.23, 66.71, 34.18, 22.18, 13.94.
General procedure for the synthesis of compounds 4a–c
The acid derivative (1.0 equiv) was suspended in dry DCM and was added oxalyl chloride (1.5 equiv) and a catalytic amount of DMF. The mixture was stirred for 2 h at room temperature and evaporated to dryness. The resulting residue was dissolved in dry DMF (5 mL/mmol) and added dropwise to a priorly stirred solution of amine derivative (0.8 equiv) and NaH (1.5 equiv) for 30 min in dry DMF (5 mL/mmol). The reaction mixture was continued stirring for overnight at room temperature, diluted with water and extracted with EtOAc. The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated under vacuum. The obtained residues were purified with flash column chromatography using 1–5% MeOH in dichloromethane gradient elution to afford the compounds 4a–c in respective yields.
2-([1,1′-Biphenyl]-4-yloxy)-N-(2-(oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)acetamide (4a)
Yield: 51%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C26H19N3O3 [M + H]+, 422.15; found 422.22; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 12.50 (bs, 1H), 8.89 (dd, 1H, J = 8.54, 0.78 Hz), 8.74 (dd, 1H, J = 4.86, 1.42 Hz), 8.34–8.29 (m, 2H), 7.75–7.62 (m, 7H), 7.59–7.56 (m, 1H), 7.46–7.30 (m, 4H), 4.89 (s, 2H). 13C (150 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 168.19, 163.84, 157.18, 154.97, 147.53, 142.08, 140.14, 138.67, 134.31, 134.03, 129.35, 129.17, 128.22, 127.34, 126.76, 124.35, 121.87, 120.54, 119.77, 116.12, 113.15, 67.58.
2-(4-Cyclohexylphenoxy)-N-(2-(oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)acetamide (4b)
Yield: 42%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C26H25N3O3 [M + H]+, 428.20; found 428.26; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 12.44 (bs, 1H), 8.88 (d, 1H, J = 7.92 Hz), 8.69 (dd, 1H, J = 4.88, 1.40 Hz), 8.34–8.28 (m, 2H), 7.72 (t, 1H, J = 7.92 Hz), 7.58–7.55 (m, 1H), 7.45–7.37 (m, 3H), 7.20 (d, 2H, J = 8.64 Hz), 4.79 (s, 2H), 2.46 (m, 1H), 1.78–1.68 (m, 5H), 1.40–1.18 (m, 5H). 13C (150 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 168.39, 163.80, 155.69, 154.97, 147.49, 142.06, 141.20, 138.67, 134.26, 129.16, 127.98, 124.30, 121.84, 120.54, 119.73, 115.39, 113.14, 67.52, 43.41, 34.68, 26.87, 26.07.
(E)-2-(hex-2-en-1-yloxy)-N-(2-(oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)acetamide (4c)
Yield: 34%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C20H21N3O3 [M + H]+, 352.17; found 352.30; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): 12.21 (bs, 1H), 8.82 (dd, 1H, J = 8.50, 0.86 Hz), 8.61 (dd, 1H, J = 4.86, 1.42 Hz), 8.32–8.26 (m, 2H), 7.69 (t, 1H, J = 7.90 Hz), 7.56–7.52 (m, 1H), 7.36 (t, 1H, J = 7.66 Hz), 5.96–5.89 (m, 1H), 5.81–5.74 (m, 1H), 4.22 (dd, 2H, J = 6.22, 0.86 Hz), 4.14 (s, 2H), 2.00 (q, 2H, J = 7.06 Hz), 1.34 (sext, 2H, J = 7.34 Hz), 0.83 (t, 3H, J = 7.38 Hz). 13C (150 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 170.18, 163.77, 154.93, 147.26, 142.03, 138.74, 135.19, 134.18, 129.12, 126.64, 124.13, 121.79, 120.50, 119.64, 113.08, 72.52, 69.46, 34.12, 22.06, 13.98.
General procedure for the synthesis of compounds 4d–k
The acid derivative (1.5 equiv), N,N′-diisopropyl ethyl amine (6.0 equiv) and TBTU (1.5 equiv) were dissolved in dry DMF (10 mL/mmol) and stirred at room temperature for 30 min. At this point, the amine derivative (1.5 equiv) was added and continued stirring at 70 °C for overnight. The reaction mixture was diluted with water and extracted with EtOAc. The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated under vacuum. The obtained residues were purified with flash column chromatography using 1–5% MeOH in dichloromethane gradient elution to afford the compounds 4d–k in respective yields.
N-(3-(oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)-2-phenoxyacetamide (4d)
Yield: 43%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C20H15N3O3 [M + H]+, 346.12; found 346.14; 1H NMR (600 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ10.45 (bs, 1H), 8.70 (s, 1H), 8.56 (dd, 1H, J = 4.83, 1.41 Hz), 8.27 (dd, 1H, J = 8.16, 1.38 Hz), 7.98 (d, 1H, J = 7.86 Hz), 7.91 (ddd, 1H, J = 8.16, 2.10, 0.90 Hz), 7.62 (t, 1H, J = 7.95 Hz), 7.49–7.47 (m, 1H), 7.35–7.32 (m, 2H), 7.04 (d, 2H, J = 7.86 Hz), 6.99 (t, 1H, J = 7.32 Hz), 4.77 (s, 2H). 13C (150 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 167.65, 165.11, 158.25, 155.91, 147.11, 143.28, 139.80, 130.47, 130.02, 126.85, 124.07, 123.34, 121.72, 121.36, 119.62, 118.93, 115.17, 67.53.
2-(4-Isopropylphenoxy)-N-(3-(oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)acetamide (4e)
Yield: 51%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C23H21N3O3 [M + H]+, 388.17; found 388.23; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ10.42 (bs, 1H), 8.71 (s, 1H), 8.56 (dd, 1H, J = 4.86, 1.42 Hz), 8.27 (dd, 1H, J = 8.16, 1.40 Hz), 7.98 (d, 1H, J = 8.2 Hz), 7.92–7.89 (m, 1H), 7.61 (t, 1H, J = 7.98 Hz), 7.50–7.47 (m, 1H), 7.19 (d, 2H, J = 8.56 Hz), 6.95 (dd, 2H, J = 6.68, 2.04 Hz), 4.73 (s, 2H), 2.88–2.81 (m, 1H), 1.18 (d, 6H, J = 6.92 Hz). 13C (150 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 167.82, 165.12, 156.37, 155.92, 147.11, 143.28, 141.66, 139.81, 130.46, 127.67, 126.85, 124.06, 123.32, 121.36, 119.61, 118.93, 114.98, 67.69, 33.08, 24.57.
2-([1,1′-Biphenyl]-4-yloxy)-N-(3-(oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)acetamide (4f)
Yield: 63%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C26H19N3O3 [M + H]+, 422.15; found 422.09; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ10.50 (bs, 1H), 8.70 (s, 1H), 8.56 (dd, 1H, J = 4.88, 1.40 Hz), 8.26 (dd, 1H, J = 8.18, 1.41 Hz), 7.99 (d, 1H, J = 7.80 Hz), 7.91–7.88 (m, 1H), 7.66–7.60 (m, 5H), 7.50–7.41 (m, 3H), 7.31 (t, 1H, J = 7.36 Hz), 7.13 (d, 2H, J = 8.84 Hz), 4.82 (s, 2H). 13C (150 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 167.61, 165.11, 157.92, 155.92, 147.11, 143.28, 140.18, 139.81, 133.77, 130.49, 129.34, 128.28, 127.30, 126.87, 126.72, 124.05, 123.35, 121.36, 119.62, 118.92, 115.64, 67.63.
2-(4-Cyclohexylphenoxy)-N-(3-(oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)acetamide (4 g)
Yield: 57%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C26H25N3O3 [M + H]+, 428.20; found 428.14; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ10.42 (bs, 1H), 8.71 (s, 1H), 8.56 (dd, 1H, J = 4.88, 1.40 Hz), 8.27 (dd, 1H, J = 8.16, 1.40 Hz), 7.98 (dd, 1H, J = 6.72, 1.48 Hz), 7.91 (dd, 1H, J = 8.20, 1.16 Hz), 7.61 (t, 1H, J = 8.00 Hz), 7.50–7.47 (m, 1H), 7.17 (d, 2H, J = 8.68 Hz), 6.94 (d, 2H, J = 8.72 Hz), 4.73 (s, 2H), 2.44 (m, 1H), 1.77–1.67 (m, 5H), 1.38–1.19 (m, 5H). 13C (150 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 167.84, 165.11, 156.39, 155.92, 147.11, 143.27, 140.94, 139.81, 130.46, 128.02, 126.84, 124.05, 123.31, 121.36, 119.61, 118.92, 114.96, 67.67, 43.39, 34.67, 26.86, 26.06.
(E)-2-(hex-2-en-1-yloxy)-N-(3-(oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)acetamide (4 h)
Yield: 60%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C20H21N3O3 [M + H]+, 352.17; found 352.11; 1H NMR (600 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ10.09 (bs, 1H), 8.72 (s, 1H), 8.56 (d, 1H, J = 4.74 Hz), 8.27 (d, 1H, J = 8.10 Hz), 7.96 (d, 1H, J = 7.68 Hz), 7.91 (dd, 1H, J = 8.19, 0.93 Hz), 7.59 (t, 1H, J = 7.92 Hz), 7.50–7.47 (m, 1H), 5.77–5.73 (m, 1H), 5.63–5.58 (m, 1H), 4.07 (s, 2H), 4.06 (d, 2H, J = 6.30 Hz), 2.02 (q, 2H, J = 7.06 Hz), 1.38 (sext, 2H, J = 7.34 Hz), 0.87 (t, 3H, J = 7.38 Hz). 13C (150 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 169.32, 165.18, 155.91, 147.09, 143.26, 139.84, 135.04, 130.34, 126.74, 126.56, 124.16, 123.19, 121.35, 119.60, 119.00, 71.82, 69.37, 34.22, 22.16, 13.99.
2-([1,1′-Biphenyl]-4-yloxy)-N-(4-(oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)acetamide (4i)
Yield: 42%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C26H19N3O3 [M + H]+, 422.15; found 421.91; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 10.57 (bs, 1H), 8.53 (d, 1H, J = 4.64 Hz), 8.23 (t, 3H, J = 8.16 Hz), 7.95 (d, 2H, J = 8.40 Hz), 7.63 (t, 4H, J = 7.10 Hz), 7.43 (t, 3H, J = 6.68 Hz), 7.32 (t, 1H, J = 7.28 Hz), 7.11 (d, 2H, J = 8.48 Hz), 4.84 (s, 2H). 13C (150 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 167.75, 165.17, 157.89, 156.17, 146.89, 143.16, 142.90, 140.16, 133.79, 129.35, 129.25, 128.29, 127.32, 126.72, 121.17, 120.98, 120.25, 119.31, 115.62, 67.65.
2-(4-Cyclohexylphenoxy)-N-(4-(oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)acetamide (4j)
Yield: 44%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C26H25N3O3 [M + H]+, 428.20; found 427.95; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 10.50 (bs, 1H), 8.53 (dd, 1H, J = 4.86, 1.18 Hz), 8.24–8.21 (m, 3H), 7.94 (d, 2H, J = 8.80 Hz), 7.46–7.43 (m, 1H), 7.16 (d, 2H, J = 8.64 Hz), 6.92 (d, 2H, J = 8.64 Hz), 4.73 (s, 2H), 2.44 (m, 1H), 1.77–1.67 (m, 5H), 1.41–1.19 (m, 5H). 13C (150 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 167.97, 165.16, 156.37, 156.17, 146.88, 143.15, 142.91, 140.97, 129.22, 128.03, 121.13, 120.97, 120.23, 119.29, 114.93, 67.70, 43.38, 34.67, 26.85, 26.06.
(E)-2-(hex-2-en-1-yloxy)-N-(4-(oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)acetamide (4k)
Yield: 54%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C20H21N3O3 [M + H]+, 352.17; found 352.05; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): 10.17 (bs, 1H), 8.53 (dd, 1H, J = 4.88, 1.24 Hz), 8.21 (dd, 3H, J = 9.18, 1.94 Hz), 7.95 (d, 2H, J = 8.80 Hz), 7.46–7.43 (m, 1H), 5.78–5.71 (m, 1H), 5.62–5.55 (m, 1H), 4.08 (s, 2H), 4.05 (d, 2H, J = 6.24 Hz), 2.01 (q, 2H, J = 6.96 Hz), 1.38 (sext, 2H, J = 7.35 Hz), 0.87 (t, 3H, J = 7.36 Hz). 13C (150 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 169.47, 165.22, 156.19, 146.86, 143.14, 143.00, 135.06, 129.13, 126.54, 120.96, 120.94, 120.26, 119.28, 71.80, 69.40, 34.21, 22.15, 14.00.
General procedure for the synthesis of compounds 4 l–n (Scheme 1)
The acid derivative (1.0 equiv) was suspended in dry DCM and was added oxalyl chloride (1.5 equiv) and a catalytic amount of DMF. The mixture was stirred for 2 h at room temperature and evaporated to dryness. The resulting residue was dissolved in dry DMF (5 mL/mmol) and added dropwise to a priorly stirred solution of amine derivative (0.8 equiv) and triethylamine (2.5 equiv) for 30 min in dry DMF (5 mL/mmol). The reaction mixture was continued stirring for overnight at room temperature, diluted with water and extracted with EtOAc. The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated under vacuum. The obtained residues were purified with flash column chromatography using 1–5% MeOH in dichloromethane gradient elution to afford the compounds 4 l–n in respective yields.
N-(2-(1H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)-2-([1,1'-biphenyl]-4-yloxy)acetamide (4 l)
Yield: 46%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C26H20N4O2 [M + H]+, 421.17; found 421.09; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 13.47 (bs, 2H, imidazole-NH, acetamide-NH), 8.85 (d, 1H, J = 8.16 Hz), 8.45 (bs, 1H), 8.20 (d, 1H, J = 7.32 Hz), 7.99 (dd, 1H, J = 8.00, 1.32 Hz), 7.66–7.53 (m, 6H), 7.43 (t, 3H, J = 7.68 Hz), 7.31 (t, 3H, J = 7.32 Hz), 4.86 (s, 2H). 13C (150 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ168.16, 157.56, 152.97, 144.93, 140.12, 138.13, 133.99, 131.67, 129.34, 128.51, 128.27, 127.33, 126.73, 124.00, 120.81, 119.00, 116.58, 116.06, 68.14.
N-(2-(1H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)-2-(4-cyclohexylphenoxy)acetamide (4m)
Yield: 21%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C26H26N4O2 [M + H]+, 427.21; found 427.07; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 13.43 (bs, 2H, imidazole-NH, acetamide-NH), 8.82 (d, 1H, J = 7.68 Hz), 8.42 (bs, 1H), 8.19 (d, 1H, J = 6.92 Hz), 7.91 (d, 1H, J = 7.16 Hz), 7.53 (t, 1H, J = 7.55 Hz), 7.32–7.27 (m, 4H), 7.17 (d, 2H, J = 8.56 Hz), 4.75 (s, 2H), 2.43 (m, 1H), 1.78–1.67 (m, 5H), 1.37–1.21 (m, 5H). 13C (150 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 167.97, 155.69, 152.92, 144.31, 140.76, 137.67, 131.10, 128.10, 127.60, 123.52, 120.35, 118.36, 116.39, 114.93, 67.77, 42.95, 34.22, 26.42, 25.62.
(E)-N-(2–(1H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)-2-(hex-2-en-1-yloxy)acetamide (4n)
Yield: 45%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C20H22N4O2 [M + H]+, 351.18; found 351.11; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): 13.61 (bs, 1H, imidazole-NH), 13.25 (bs, 1H, acetamide-NH), 8.80 (dd, 1H, J = 8.28, 0.96 Hz), 8.40 (dd, 1H, J = 4.66, 1.18 Hz), 8.18(d, 1H, J = 7.34 Hz), 8.01 (dd, 1H, J = 7.92, 1.12 Hz),7.52 (t, 1H, J = 7.89 Hz), 7.31–7.26 (m, 2H), 5.74 (m, 2H), 4.19 (d, 2H, J = 3.36 Hz), 4.10 (s, 2H), 2.00–1.95 (m, 2H), 1.31 (sext, 2H, J = 7.33 Hz), 0.82 (t, 3H, J = 7.38 Hz). 13C (100 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 169.93, 152.83, 144.86, 138.29, 135.07, 131.59, 128.51, 126.67, 123.71, 120.65, 118.85, 116.38, 72.27, 69.73, 34.16, 22.07, 13.96.
General procedure for the synthesis of compounds 4o–t
The acid derivative (1.5 equiv), N,N-diisopropylethylamine (6.0 equiv) and TBTU (1.5 equiv) were dissolved in dry DMF (10 mL/mmol) and stirred at room temperature for 30 min. At this point, amine derivative (1.5 equiv) was added and continued stirring at 70 °C for overnight. The reaction mixture was diluted with water and extracted with EtOAc. The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated under vacuum. The obtained residues were purified with flash column chromatography using 1–5% MeOH in dichloromethane gradient elution to afford the compounds 4o–t in respective yields.
N-(3-(1H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)-2-([1,1'-biphenyl]-4-yloxy)acetamide (4o)
Yield: 60%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C26H20N4O2 [M + H]+, 421.17; found 420.96; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ13.58–13.20 (bs, 1H, imidazole-NH), 10.35 (bs, 1H), 8.62 (s, 1H), 8.33 (bs, 1H), 8.05 (bs, 1H), 7.92(d, 1H, J = 7.40 Hz), 7.79(d, 1H, J = 7.92 Hz), 7.66–7.62 (m, 4H), 7.54 (t, 1H, J = 7.74 Hz), 7.43 (t, 2H, J = 7.70 Hz), 7.32 (t, 1H, J = 7.36 Hz), 7.27–7.24 (m, 1H), 7.13 (d, 2H, J = 8.72 Hz), 4.82 (s, 2H). 13C (150 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 167.32, 157.95, 156.77, 153.55, 152.72, 149.83, 144.56, 144.29, 140.19, 139.43, 136.02, 133.74, 130.71, 129.91, 129.35, 128.28, 127.72, 126.72, 122.42, 122.36, 122.28, 119.77, 118.79, 118.64, 115.64, 67.64.
N-(3-(1H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)-2-(4-cyclohexylphenoxy)acetamide (4p)
Yield: 44%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C26H26N4O2 [M + H]+, 427.21; found 427.00; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 13.48 (bs, 1H, imidazole-NH), 10.28 (bs, 1H), 8.60 (s, 1H), 8.34 (bs, 1H), 8.02 (bs, 1H), 7.91 (d, 1H, J = 7.68 Hz), 7.77 (d, 1H, J = 8.20 Hz), 7.52 (t, 1H, J = 7.96 Hz), 7.26–7.23 (m, 1H), 7.17 (d, 2H, J = 8.44 Hz), 6.94 (d, 2H, J = 8.24 Hz), 4.71 (s, 2H), 2.38 (m, 1H), 1.77–1.67 (m, 5H), 1.38–1.19 (m, 5H). 13C (150 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 167.55, 156.42, 153.54, 152.70, 149.81, 144.60, 144.27, 140.92, 139.42, 136.02, 130.68, 129.88, 128.01, 126.77, 122.38, 119.80, 118.78, 118.63, 114.95, 67.67, 43.39, 34.67, 26.86, 26.06.
(E)-N-(3-(1H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)-2-(hex-2-en-1-yloxy)acetamide (4q)
Yield: 66%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C20H22N4O2 [M + H]+, 351.18; found 351.11; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 13.54–13.17 (bs, 1H, imidazole-NH), 9.93 (bs, 1H), 8.60 (s, 1H), 8.33 (bs, 1H), 8.05 (bs, 1H), 7.89 (d, 1H, J = 7.64 Hz), 7.77 (d, 1H, J = 7.56 Hz), 7.51 (t, 1H, J = 7.64 Hz), 7.27–7.24 (m, 1H, J = 7.70 Hz), 5.79–5.72 (m, 1H), 5.64–5.57 (m, 1H), 4.06–4.05 (m, 4H), 2.02 (q, 2H, J = 6.97 Hz), 1.38 (sext, 2H, J = 7.35 Hz), 0.88 (t, 3H, J = 7.36 Hz). 13C (150 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 168.99, 156.78, 153.62, 152.80, 149.82, 144.53, 144.26, 139.45, 136.02, 134.97, 130.61, 129.83, 129.77, 127.70, 126.60, 122.37, 122.27, 119.75, 118.85, 118.62, 71.79, 69.39, 34.22, 22.17, 14.01.
N-(4-(1H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)-2-([1,1'-biphenyl]-4-yloxy)acetamide(4r)
Yield: 58%; ESIMS m/z calcd for C26H20N4O2 [M + H]+, 421.17; found 421.02; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 13.31 (bs, 1H, imidazole-NH), 10.40 (bs, 1H, acetamide-NH), 8.31 (d, 1H, J = 4.48 Hz), 8.20 (d, 2H, J = 8.72 Hz), 7.96 (bs, 1H), 7.85 (d, 2H, J = 8.72 Hz), 7.64 (t, 4H, J = 7.38 Hz), 7.44 (t, 2H, J = 7.68 Hz), 7.32 (t, 1H, J = 7.36 Hz),7.23–7.20 (m, 1H), 7.12 (d, 2H, J = 8.76 Hz), 4.82 (s, 2H). 13C (150 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 167.44, 157.92, 144.24, 140.90, 140.17, 133.77, 129.35, 128.29, 127.94, 127.31, 126.72, 125.28, 120.13, 118.51, 115.63, 67.67.
N-(4-(1H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)-2-(4-cyclohexylphenoxy)acetamide(4s)
Yield: 49%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C26H26N4O2 [M + H]+, 427.21; found 427.07; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 13.33 (bs, 1H, imidazole-NH), 10.33 (bs, 1H, acetamide-NH), 8.31 (d, 1H, J = 4.12 Hz), 8.19 (d, 2H, J = 8.64 Hz), 7.97 (d, 1H, J = 7.44 Hz), 7.84 (d, 2H, J = 8.68 Hz), 7.24–7.20 (m, 1H), 7.16 (d, 2H, J = 8.56 Hz), 6.92 (d, 2H, J = 8.60 Hz), 4.71 (s, 2H), 2.44 (m, 1H), 1.77–1.67 (m, 5H), 1.41–1.19 (m, 5H). 13C (150 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 167.67, 156.39, 152.72, 149.91, 144.29, 143.90, 140.95, 136.09, 128.02, 126.41, 125.22, 120.12, 119.51, 118.49, 114.94, 67.72, 43.38, 34.67, 26.86, 26.06.
(E)-N-(4-(1H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)-2-(hex-2-en-1-yloxy)acetamide(4t)
Yield: 44%; ESI–MS m/z calcd for C20H22N4O2 [M + H]+, 351.18; found 351.11; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO): 13.34 (bs, 1H, imidazole-NH), 9.98 (bs, 1H, acetamide-NH), 8.31 (d, 1H, J = 3.92 Hz), 8.17 (d, 2H, J = 8.72 Hz), 7.98 (bs, 1H), 7.85(d, 2H, J = 8.72 Hz), 7.23–7.20 (m, 1H), 5.78–5.71 (m, 1H), 5.63–5.56 (m, 1H), 4.06–4.04 (m, 4H), 2.02 (q, 2H, J = 7.01 Hz), 1.38 (sext, 2H, J = 7.32 Hz), 0.88 (t, 3H, J = 7.36 Hz). 13C (100 MHz, (CD3)2SO): δ 169.14, 156.98, 153.57, 152.74, 149.88, 144.30, 143.87, 140.96, 136.15, 135.03, 127.88, 127.78, 126.56, 126.39, 125.07, 120.14, 119.39, 118.49, 118.22, 71.79, 69.42, 34.22, 22.16, 14.00.
Results and discussion
Chemistry
Oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridine (4a–k) and 1H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridine derivatives (4 l–t) with 2-alkoxy and 2-aryloxyacetamidesubstituents in ortho, meta and para position (Table 1) were synthesised using the short and efficient route shown in Scheme 1. Previous methods for the preparation of oxazolopyridine derivatives were limited to one positional isomer and only demonstrated to work for phenols22. Moreover, synthetic pathways for compounds based on the imidazopyridine scaffold required protection of the imidazole NH group to avoid diacylation during the anilide bond formation23. Our synthetic pathway efficiently gives access to aryloxy- and alkyloxy acetamides in all positional isomers without the need for the protection of the imidazole NH group.
| ID | Structure | IC50 (μM)a | Maximum inhibition (%)b | ID | Structure | IC50 (μM)a | Maximum inhibition (%)b |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4a | NAc | 3 ± 5 | 4k | NA | 46 ± 9 | ||
| 4b | NA | −1 ± 3 | 4l | 1.1 | 70 ± 2 | ||
| 4c | NA | 7 ± 3 | 4m | 0.65 | 82 ± 3 | ||
| 4d | 18 | 100 | 4n | 5.5 | 100 | ||
| 4e | 2.1 | 100 | 4o | 13 | 71 ± 9 | ||
| 4f | 0.63 | 100 | 4p | 47 | 100 | ||
| 4g | 2.6 | 100 | 4q | 73 | 100 | ||
| 4h | 17 | 100 | 4r | 0.62 | 80 ± 2 | ||
| 4i | 0.35 | 75 ± 4 | 4s | 1.5 | 62 ± 4 | ||
| 4j | NA | 19 ± 10 | 4t | 64 | 100 |
The intermediates 2a–c and 2d–f were obtained by condensation of respective aminopyridines 1a and 1b with corresponding amino benzoic acid derivatives in the presence of polyphosphoric acid (PPA)22,24. The acid building blocks 3b–e were synthesised from the modified procedure by reacting aryl- or aliphatic alcohols with sodium iodoacetate in the presence of NaH in moderate yields25. The final meta and para compounds 4d–k and 4o–t were obtained in moderate yields from corresponding amines 2b, 2c, 2e and 2f and acid derivatives 3a–e by using N,N,N′,N′-tetramethyl-O-(benzotriazol-1-yl)uroniumtetrafluoroborate (TBTU) as coupling agent and N,N-diisopropylethylamine (DIPEA) as base. The ortho-oxazolopyridineanilides 4a–c were synthesised by reacting the respective acid chloride with compound 2a in presence of NaH as a base and the ortho-imidazopyridineanilides 4 l–n by reacting the respective acid chloride with 2d using triethylamine as a base.
Inhibition of FAAH
All synthesised compounds 4a–t were evaluated for their in vitro FAAH inhibitory profile using rat brain homogenates as enzyme source and 0.5 µM [3H] AEA as substrate26,27. The data are summarised in Table 1, and examples of the inhibition curves obtained for compounds of different potency are shown in Figure 2. A structure–activity relationship (SAR) analysis revealed that the oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridine-ortho-anilides a–c were void of activity while in the set of oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridine-meta-anilides 4d–h all compounds inhibited FAAH. Compound 4f with a biphenyl ether was the most potent and completely blocked AEA hydrolysis with an IC50 of 0.63 µM. Among the oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridine-para-anilides 4i–k, the results were less clear. In this set, we identified the oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridine-para-anilide with a biphenyl ether group 4i as the most potent compound with an IC50 of 0.35 µM. However, this compound did not reach 100% inhibition even at high concentrations. The other compounds all proved to be less effective as FAAH inhibitors. To further investigate the importance of the oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridine core, the ortho, meta and para isomers 4 l–t with hex-2-en-1-yl, biphenyl and 4-cyclohexylphenyl groups on the 1H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridine anilide were synthesised an evaluated. In this set, the most potent compound proved to be the biphenyl para-substituted compound 4r with an IC50 value of 0.62 µM and maximum inhibition of 80%, thus equipotent with the oxazolo derivative 4i. The ortho-oxazolo derivatives 4a–c were all inactive in contrast to the imidazo isosteres 4 l–n with IC50 values ranging from 0.65 to 5.5 µM. The meta-substituted imidazo compounds 4o–q were all less potent than their corresponding oxazoloisosteres 4f–h. For the para-substituted compounds, no clear trends were observed and potent as well as poor inhibitors were found among both oxazolo and imidazo compounds, for example, 4i and 4r compared to, for example, 4k and 4t. The data show that the oxazolo and imidazo compounds display slightly different SARs based on the positioning of these groups and the amide on the central aromatic ring. Based on the low IC50 and maximum inhibition, the oxazolo scaffold, for example, 4f is superior when carrying large cyclic substituents in meta position.
The data summarised in Table 1 was according to an assay where the compounds were not pre-incubated with the enzyme prior to the addition of substrate, in order to give an estimate of the initial affinity between inhibitor and FAAH. However, for most of the compounds, concentration–response curves were also obtained using a 60-min pre-incubation period, in order to determine whether or not the observed inhibition was time-dependent. A small degree of time-dependent inhibition was seen with 4t (IC50 values of 43 vs. 64 µM for 60 vs. 0 min of pre-incubation). For compound 4i, the IC50 valued were essentially the same (0.28 vs. 0.35 µM for 60 vs. 0 min of pre-incubation), but the maximum observed inhibition was lower for the pre-incubated samples (39 ± 2% vs. 75 ± 4%, respectively). A reduced maximal inhibition was also seen with 4 l, 4m and 4r, whereas essentially identical inhibition curves were seen with 4n–q and 4s.
Compounds 4a–c were not active, even after pre-incubation. These data support the conclusion that the compounds are reversible FAAH inhibitors. Under our assay conditions with a 60-min pre-incubation, the irreversible inhibitor URB597 gave an IC50 value of around 2 nM28–30, which is in line with previously reported data of 4.6 ± 1.6 nM7.
We determined the thermodynamic aqueous solubility in phosphate-buffered saline (10 mM, pH 7.48) at 37 °C of a subset of compounds essentially as described previously31. It is clear that all the tested compounds (4f, 4i, 4m, 4r and 4s) are poorly soluble under these conditions with solubility ranging from 3 to 20 µM. Comparison of 4i and 4r indicates that there is no difference in solubility, 18 and 20 µM, respectively, between oxazolo and imidazo compounds. Compounds with the cyclohexylphenoxy substitutent were generally less soluble than compounds with the biphenyl substituent, as seen for 4s (3 µM) and 4r (20 µM).
Molecular modelling
To evaluate potential binding poses of the compounds to FAAH, 4a–t were docked to a crystal structure of FAAH (PDB code: 3QJ9)32 using a docking protocol validated on the crystal ligand’s docking performance (Figure 3(a)). Further details on method and results are given in the Supporting information. The crystal ligand 1-{(3S)-1-[4–(1-benzofuran-2-yl)pyrimidin-2-yl]piperidin-3-yl}-3-ethyl-1,3-dihydro-2H-benzimidazol-2-one bound to FAAH with the benzofurane in the ligand binding site entrance interacting with Trp531 through a T-shaped aromatic interaction, and the benzimidazole-2-one deep inside the protein closer to the catalytic triad (Figure 3(a)). The pyrimidine bound to the protein via a water-mediated hydrogen bond, but no other classical hydrogen bonds were present, indicating a protein–ligand interaction mainly dominated by hydrophobic forces. Analysis of the docking binding poses revealed that molecules with the amide in para-position to the oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridine moiety (4i–k) or to the 1H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (4r–t) bound with the aromatic parts at the same binding site as those of the ligand present in the crystal structure (Figure 3(b)). Molecules with the amide in ortho-position (4a–c and 4 l–m), the oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridine or 1H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridine rings bound in the same place as the crystal ligand benzofurane, while the other aromatic parts did not overlay (Figure 3(c)). Thus, the ortho molecules did not display the same binding mode as the crystal ligand and the hex-2-en-1-yl, biphenyl and 4-cyclohexylphenyl groups (Figure 3(c)) extending towards the catalytic triad (Figure 3(a)). The meta molecules displayed a mix of binding modes varying between those similar to the crystal ligand and those similar to the ortho molecules. Notably, the potent meta-molecule 4i bound with all aromatic parts overlaying with the crystal ligand’s ditto, very similar to compound 4r (Figure 3(b)) indicating a plausible binding conformation. The docking scores (Glidescore)33 and the binding free energies (MM-GBSA)34 of the docked compounds were compared to the measured IC50 values. The crystal ligand was the strongest binder according to MM-GBSA (ΔGbind = −95 kcal/mol) and the reported IC50 for that compound was 0.1 µM32 compared to our strongest inhibitors (ΔGbind of −47 to −71 kcal/mol) with IC50 of 0.35–0.65 µM. Nevertheless, the binding free energies could not be used as a reliable indicator of binding strength between the molecules and FAAH. For instance, the difference seen between ortho-molecules carrying the oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridine ring, which were inactive, and the ones carrying the 1H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridine, which included strong to weak inhibitors, could not be differentiated based on the binding free energy. Moreover, the potent inhibitor 4f was deemed weak according to ΔGbind (−47 kcal/mol), while the equipotent inhibitors 4i and 4r had a ΔGbind of −71 and −67 kcal/mole, respectively. Thus, the binding event of these inhibitors to FAAH is intricate, possibly including water-mediated interactions that has not been accounted in the energy calculations. The binding poses of the molecules, and especially for some of the meta and para molecules, are similar to the one seen in the crystal structure, although the affinity for FAAH cannot be completely and accurately described with MM-GBSA calculations.
Conclusions
In conclusion, for the first time, N-aryl 2-aryloxyacetamides were identified as FAAH inhibitors. These chemical scaffolds may serve to be useful as templates for the design of novel inhibitors of this physiologically important enzyme.
Supporting information
Information on the docking method, results and references, general chemistry and 1H and 13C spectra of final compounds 4a–t.
Supplementary Material
Funding Statement
Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse, 10.13039/501100004063 [2008.0064]; Vetenskapsrådet, 10.13039/501100004359 [521-2012-2802].
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Umeå Centre for Microbial Research (UCMR), Umeå, Molecular Infection Medicine Sweden (MIMS), Umeå, the Knut & Alice Wallenberg foundation, the Swedish Research Council (for M.E.). The authors would like to acknowledge the Swedish National Infrastructure for Computing (SNIC) and the High Performance Computing Centre North (HPC2N) for computational resources and technical support.
Disclosure statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.
References
Untitled section
References
- 1.Pacher P, Batkai S, Kunos G.. The endocannabinoid system as an emerging target of pharmacotherapy. Pharmacol Rev 2006;58:389–462.
- 2.Alger BE, Kim J.. Supply and demand for endocannabinoids. Trends Neurosci 2011;34:304–15.
- 3.Deutsch DG, Chin SA.. Enzymatic synthesis and degradation of anandamide, a cannabinoid receptor agonist. Biochem Pharmacol 1993;46:791–6.
- 4.Blankman JL, Simon GM, Cravatt BF.. A comprehensive profile of brain enzymes that hydrolyze the endocannabinoid 2-arachidonoylglycerol. Chem Biol 2007;14:1347–56.
- 5.Giang DK, Cravatt BF.. Molecular characterization of human and mouse fatty acid amide hydrolases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997;94:2238–42.
- 6.Fowler CJ, Jonsson K-O, Tiger G.. Fatty acid amide hydrolase: biochemistry, pharmacology, and therapeutic possibilities for an enzyme hydrolyzing anandamide, 2-arachidonoylglycerol, palmitoylethanolamide, and oleamide. Biochem Pharmacol 2001;62:517–26.
- 7.Kathuria S, Gaetani S, Fegley D, et al. Modulation of anxiety through blockade of anandamide hydrolysis. Nat Med 2003;9:76–81.
- 8.Chang L, Luo L, Palmer JA, et al. Inhibition of fatty acid amide hydrolase produces analgesia by multiple mechanisms. Br J Pharmacol 2006;148:102–13.
- 9.Jayamanne A, Greenwood R, Mitchell VA, et al. Actions of the FAAH inhibitor URB597 in neuropathic and inflammatory chronic pain models. Br J Pharmacol 2006;147:281–8.
- 10.Gobbi G, Bambico FR, Mangieri R, et al. Antidepressant-like activity and modulation of brain monoaminergic transmission by blockade of anandamide hydrolysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:18620–5.
- 11.Ahn K, Johnson DS, Mileni M, et al. Discovery and characterization of a highly selective FAAH inhibitor that reduces inflammatory pain. Chem Biol 2009;16:411–20.
- 12.McKinney MK, Cravatt BF.. Structure and function of fatty acid amide hydrolase . Annu Rev Biochem 2005;74:411–32.
- 13.Vandevoorde S.Overview of the chemical families of fatty acid amide hydrolase and monoacylglycerol lipase inhibitors. Curr Top Med Chem 2008;8:247–67.
- 14.Boger DL, Sato H, Lerner AE, et al. Exceptionally potent inhibitors of fatty acid amide hydrolase: the enzyme responsible for degradation of endogenous oleamide and anandamide. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97:5044–9.
- 15.Lodola A, Castelli R, Mor M, et al. Fatty acid amide hydrolase inhibitors: a patent review (2009–2014). Expert Opin Ther Patents 2015;25:1247–66.
- 16.Mor M, Rivara S, Lodola A, et al. Cyclohexylcarbamic acid 3′- or 4′-substituted biphenyl-3-yl esters as fatty acid amide hydrolase inhibitors: synthesis, quantitative structure-activity relationships, and molecular modeling studies. J Med Chem 2004;47:4998–5008.
- 17.Alexander JP, Cravatt BF.. Mechanism of carbamate inactivation of FAAH: implications for the design of covalent inhibitors and in vivo functional probes for enzymes. Chem Biol 2005;12:1179–87.
- 18.Lodola A, Capoferri L, Rivara S, et al. Quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics modeling of fatty acid amide hydrolase reactivation distinguishes substrate from irreversible covalent inhibitors. J Med Chem 2013;56:2500–12.
- 19.Piomelli D, Tarzia G, Duranti A, et al. Pharmacological profile of the selective FAAH inhibitor KDS-4103 (URB597). CNS Drug Rev 2006;12:21–38.
- 20.Bracey MH, Hanson MA, Masuda KR, et al. Structural adaptations in a membrane enzyme that terminates endocannabinoid signalling. Science 2002;298:1793–6.
- 21.Bertolacci L, Romeo E, Veronesi M, et al. A binding site for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in fatty acid amide hydrolase. J Am Chem Soc 2013;135:22–5.
- 22.Nunes JJ, Milne JC, Bemis JE, et al. Imidazopyridine derivatives as sirtuin modulating agents. Patent WO2007/019345 A1; 2007.
- 23.Bemis JE, Vu CB, Xie R, et al. Discovery of oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridines and related heterocyclic analogs as novel SIRT1 activators. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2009;19:2350–3.
- 24.Garmaise DL, Komlossy J.. The preparation of 2-arylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridines. J Org Chem 1964;29:3403–5.
- 25.Eichelberger U, Neundorf I, Hennig L, et al. Synthesis of analogues of the 2-O-alkyl glycerate part of the moenomycins. Tetrahedron 2002;58:545–59.
- 26.Boldrup L, Wilson SJ, Barbier AJ, et al. A simple stopped assay for fatty acid amide hydrolase avoiding the use of a chloroform extraction phase. J Biochem Biophys Methods 2004;60:171–7.
- 27.Cipriano M, Björklund E, Wilson AA, et al. Inhibition of fatty acid amide hydrolase and cyclooxygenase by the N-(3-methylpyridin-2-yl)amide derivatives of flurbiprofen and naproxen. Eur J Pharmacol 2013;720:383–90.
- 28.Wilson AA, Hicks JW, Sadovski O, et al. Radiosynthesis and evaluation of [C-11-carbonyl]-labeled carbamates as fatty acid amide hydrolase radiotracers for positron emission tomography. J Med Chem 2013;56:201–9.
- 29.Paylor B, Holt S, Fowler CJ.. The potency of the fatty acid amide hydrolase inhibitor URB597 is dependent upon the assay pH. Pharmacol Res 2006;54:481–5.
- 30.Paylor B, Holt S, Fowler CJ.. Erratum to The potency of the fatty acid amide hydrolase inhibitor URB597 is dependent upon the assay pH. Pharmacol Res 2006;55:80.
- 31.Bergström CA, Norinder U, Luthman K, Artursson P.. Experimental and computational screening models for prediction of aqueous drug solubility. Pharm Res 2002;19:182–8.
- 32.Min X, Thibault ST, Porter AC, et al. Discovery and molecular basis of potent noncovalent inhibitors of fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011;108:7379–84.
- 33.Friesner RA, Banks JL, Murphy RB, et al. Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. J Med Chem 2004;47:1739–49.
- 34.Still WC, Tempczyk A, Hawley RC, et al. Semianalytical treatment of solvation for molecular mechanics and dynamics. J Am Chem Soc 1990;112:6127–9.