Anatomical Evidence for a Direct Projection from Purkinje Cells in the Mouse Cerebellar Vermis to Medial Parabrachial Nucleus

Article type: Research Article

Keywords: cerebellum circuits, medial parabrachial nucleus, aden-associated virus, retrograde tracing, anterograde tracing, cerebellar vermis

Authors: Mitsuhiro Hashimoto, Akihiro Yamanaka, Shigeki Kato, Manabu Tanifuji, Kazuto Kobayashi, Hiroyuki Yaginuma

Affiliations: Department of Neuroanatomy and Embryology, Fukushima Medical University Graduate School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan; Brain Interdisciplinary Research Division, Research Institute for Science and Technology, Tokyo University of Science, Noda-shi, Japan; Department of Neuroscience II, Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Nagoya University, Nagoya-shi, Japan; Laboratory for Integrative Neural Systems, RIKEN Brain Science Institute, Saitama, Japan; Department of Molecular Genetics, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Fukushima Medical University Graduate School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan; Department of Life Science and Medical Bio-Science, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Complexity Science and Engineering, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Japan

License: Copyright © 2018 Hashimoto, Yamanaka, Kato, Tanifuji, Kobayashi and Yaginuma. CC BY 4.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Article links: DOI: 10.3389/fncir.2018.00006  |  PubMed: 29467628  |  PMC: PMC5808303

Relevance: Moderate: mentioned 3+ times in text

Full text: PDF (15.0 MB)

Introduction

The parabrachial nucleus is located in the surrounding region of the superior cerebellar peduncle (scp) and is divided into the dorsolateral region, the lateral parabrachial nucleus (LPB) and the ventromedial region, the medial parabrachial nucleus (MPB). The LPB and MPB function as relay nuclei of neural information. The LPB is involved in sodium intake (Geerling and Loewy, ref. 2008; Geerling et al., ref. 2011), respiration (Chamberlin, ref. 2004; Dutschmann and Dick, ref. 2012; Miller et al., ref. 2012; Nisimaru et al., ref. 2013), pain response (Hermanson and Blomqvist, ref. 1996; Richard et al., ref. 2005), thermosensation (for a review see Morrison and Nakamura, ref. 2011), and appetite suppression (Dipatrizio and Simansky, ref. 2008; Wu et al., ref. 2009, ref. 2012; Carter et al., ref. 2013). The MPB is involved in sleep-stage transition (Fuller et al., ref. 2011; Anaclet et al., ref. 2012), especially switching from rapid eye movement (REM) sleep to Non-REM sleep and vice versa (Hayashi et al., ref. 2015), cardiovascular and respiratory responses (Nisimaru, ref. 2004; Song et al., ref. 2006), and taste (Rosen et al., ref. 2011; Tokita and Boughter, ref. 2012).

Human patients with cerebellar diseases suffer from sleep disturbance (insomnia, excessive daytime sleepiness, REM behavior disorder, and sleep apnea) (Pedroso et al., ref. 2011; DelRosso and Hoque, ref. 2014; Canto et al., ref. 2017). In addition, cats with lesions of the cerebellar vermis and hemispheres (de Andrés and Reinoso-Suarez, ref. 1979; de Andrés et al., ref. 2011) and cerebellectomized cats (Cunchillos and De Andres, ref. 1982) showed abnormal sleep-wake cycles. In rabbits, Purkinje cells in cerebellar lobule III, the lateral-most region of cerebellar lobule IX, and the flocculus (FL) directly project to the LPB, and are involved in the modulation of cardiovascular and respiratory responses (Supple and Kapp, ref. 1994; Sadakane et al., ref. 2000; Nisimaru et al., ref. 2013). These studies suggest that the cerebellum contributes to regulating the sleep-wake cycle, and the cardiovascular and respiratory responses. Interestingly, the neurons of the LPB and MPB originate in Atoh1/Math1-positive progenitor cells in the rostral rhombic lip, which is identical to the origin of cerebellar granule cells (Machold and Fishell, ref. 2005; Wang et al., ref. 2005; Rose et al., ref. 2009; Hayashi et al., ref. 2015). Therefore, the cerebellum seems to be closely related to the parabrachial nucleus with respect to neural development, neural circuit formation, and physiological function, but the relationship between the cerebellum and the parabrachial nucleus has been unclear in rodents.

In this study, we used an AAV vector (serotype rh10) expressing hrGFP as an anterograde tracer and Fast Blue and AAV vector (retrograde serotype, rAAV2-retro; Tervo et al., ref. 2016) as retrograde tracers to investigate the neural circuit of the cerebellum. Using the AAV vector (serotype rh10), we found that lobules VIII and IX of mouse cerebellar vermis directly projected their axons to the MPB. Furthermore, retrograde labeling of the MPB indicated that the Purkinje cells of lobules VIII–X directly projected their axons to the ipsilateral MPB. The existence of direct axonal projection from lobules VIII–X to the MPB suggests that the cerebellum contributes to the regulation of the sleep-wake cycle, and of cardiovascular and respiratory responses, by modulating the neural activity of the MPB.

Materials and methods

Preparation of an adeno-associated viral vector

AAV-CMV-hrGFP is a recombinant AAV (serotype rh10) which expresses hrGFP; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) under the control of human cytomegalovirus (CMV) immediate early enhancer and promoter. hrGFP is a green fluorescent protein derived from Renilla reniformis and has a lower cytotoxicity than a green fluorescent protein derived from Aequorea victoria. A packaging plasmid of AAV serotype rh10 was purchased from the Penn Vector Core-Gene Therapy Program (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA). AAV-CMV-hrGFP was constructed with a pAAV-hrGFP plasmid (Agilent Technologies) and the packaging plasmid of AAV serotype rh10. The packaging, purification, and titration of AAV-CMV-hrGFP was performed as described previously (Inutsuka et al., ref. 2014; Miyamoto et al., ref. 2016).

The AAV vector, AAV2retro-CAG-EGFP was constructed with a AAV-CAGGS-EGFP plasmid that was a gift from Rudolf Jaenisch (Addgene plasmid #22212; Hockemeyer et al., ref. 2009) and a packaging plasmid of rAAV2-retro helper that was a gift from Alla Karpova and David Schaffer (Addgene plasmid #81070; Tervo et al., ref. 2016). AAV2retro-CAG-EGFP expressed enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP), which is derived from A. victoria, under the control of CAG promoter. The packaging, purification, and titration of AAV2retro-CAG-EGFP was performed as described previously (Kaneda et al., ref. 2011). Briefly, AAV2retro-CAG-EGFP was purified twice by cesium gradient ultracentrifugation and the titer was determined by quantitative PCR for EGFP.

Animals

ICR mice (Slc:ICR; NipponSLC, Sizuoka, Japan) were housed in a controlled environment under a 12-h light:dark cycle. All procedures involving animal preparation were approved by the Fukushima Medical University Animal Committee.

Injection of AAV vector

The stereotaxic coordinates and nomenclature of each brain region were based on Paxinos and Franklin (ref. 2001). A heat-pulled glass micropipette (tip diameter 5 μm) attached to a microinjector (IM-300, Narishige, Tokyo, Japan) was filled with AAV-CMV-hrGFP solution (2 × 10¹² particles/ml) or AAV2retro-CAG-EGFP solution (2 × 10¹² particles/ml).

Adult ICR mice were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of a mixture of three anesthetic agents [0.3 mg/kg body weight medetomidine hydrochloride (Nippon Zenyaku Kogyo Co., Ltd., Fukushima, Japan), 4.0 mg/kg body weight midazolam (Sandoz, Tokyo, Japan), 5.0 mg/kg body weight butorphanol (Meiji Seika Pharma Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan; Kawai et al., ref. 2011)]. After deep anesthesia, the mice were secured on a stereotaxic apparatus (SRS-A, Narishige, Tokyo, Japan). A midline incision was made at the occipital region of the scalp. The skull and the trapezius muscle were exposed. A midline incision was made along the nuchal ligament. The occipital bone and the atlantooccipital membrane were exposed. Cerebellar lobule IX was observed under the posterior edge of the occipital bone through the atlantooccipital membrane. For AAV-CMV-hrGFP injection into the cerebellar lobule IX (n = 6, male), a small transversal incision was made at the atlantooccipital membrane for insertion of the glass micropipette. For AAV-CMV-hrGFP injection into the cerebellar lobule VI (n = 5, male), a 2-mm-diameter hole was made on the occipital bone at the point 7 mm caudal from bregma with a high-speed drill. For AAV-CMV-hrGFP injection into the cerebellar lobule VIII (n = 5, male), a 2-mm-diameter hole was made on the occipital bone at the point 8.5 mm caudal from bregma with a high-speed drill. The injection site of AAV-CMV-hrGFP was the center of the lateral half of the cerebellar lobule. The tip of the glass micropipette was inserted 0.5 mm deep to the surface of the cerebellar lobule. AAV-CMV-hrGFP solution (0.2 μl) was injected bilaterally into the cerebellar lobule through the micropipette. AAV-CMV-hrGFP injection into the MPB (n = 4, male) and AAV2retro-CAG-EGFP injection into the MPB (n = 6, male) were performed in accordance with the description in the section of Injection of Fast Blue (see below). AAV-CMV-hrGFP solution (0.2 μl) or AAV2retro-CAG-EGFP solution (0.01 μl) was injected into one side of the MPB through the micropipette. After the injection, the skin was sutured. One to two weeks later, the mice were fixed with an intracardiac perfusion of phosphate-buffered saline without calcium and magnesium PBS(–) and 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (PB) (pH 7.4). The brains were removed and further fixed in the same fixative for 1 h at 4°C. The brains were cryoprotected by serial equilibration in sucrose [10, 15, and 20% (w/v) in PBS(–)] at 4°C, frozen in a Tissue-Tek O.C.T. Compound (Sakura Finetek USA, Inc., Torrance, CA, USA), and sectioned transversely (20 μm thickness) on a cryostat (CM3050S, Leica, Solms, Germany).

Injection of fast blue

Fast Blue (17740-1, Polyscience, Inc., Warrington, PA, USA) is a fluorescent dye (excitation wavelength 365 nm, emission wavelength 420 nm) most commonly used as a retrograde neuronal tracer. Fast Blue is effectively transported retrogradely over long distances in mouse models (Schofield, ref. 2008). In the present study, Fast Blue was diluted in sterilized water [5% (w/v)]. A heat-pulled glass micropipette (tip diameter 5 μm), which was attached to a microinjector (IM-300, Narishige), was filled with the diluted Fast Blue solution. The micropipette was attached to a micromanipulator (SM-15, Narishige) of the stereotaxic apparatus (SRS-A, Narishige). Adult ICR mice were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of a mixture of three anesthetic agents (Kawai et al., ref. 2011). Under deep anesthesia, the mice were secured on a stereotaxic platform (SRS-A, Narishige). The tooth bar was set 2 mm below the point of the ear bar. A midline incision was made in the scalp and the skull was exposed. A 2-mm-diameter hole was made at the point 5.3 mm caudal and 0.9 mm lateral from bregma. Fast Blue solution (0.2 μl) was slowly injected into one side of the MPB (anteroposterior from bregma, −5.3 mm; mediolateral from bregma, 0.9 mm; dorsoventral from bregma, 3.4 mm) through the micropipette (n = 10, male). In the case of Fast Blue-injection into cerebellar lobule IX (n = 5, male), Fast Blue was injected into cerebellar lobule IX in the same way as the injection of AAV vector. In the case of Fast Blue-injection into medial vestibular nucleus (MVe), a 2-mm-diameter hole was made at the point 6 mm caudal and 0.7 mm lateral from bregma. Fast Blue solution (0.2 μl) was slowly injected into one side of the MVe (anteroposterior from bregma, −6 mm; mediolateral from bregma, 0.7 mm; dorsoventral from bregma, 3.9 mm) through the micropipette (n = 4, male). After the injection, the skin was sutured. 1 week later, the mice were fixed with an intracardiac perfusion of PBS(–) and 4% PFA in 0.1 M PB (pH 7.4). The brains were removed and further fixed in the same fixative for 1 h at 4°C. The brains were cryoprotected by serial equilibration in sucrose [10, 15, and 20% (w/v) in PBS(–)] at 4°C, frozen in a Tissue-Tek O.C.T. Compound (Sakura Finetek USA, Inc.), and sectioned transversely (20 μm thickness) on a cryostat (CM3050S, Leica).

Immunohistochemistry

Tissue sections were soaked with PBS(–) and incubated for 1 h in PBS(–) with 1% skim milk (Wako, Tokyo, Japan) and 0.1% Triton X-100 (blocking solution), followed by incubation with the primary antibody diluted in the blocking solution overnight at 4°C. Sections were washed several times with PBS(–) and incubated with the appropriate fluorescence-conjugated secondary antibody for 2 h. The primary antibodies were as follows: rabbit polyclonal anti-GFP (1:500, #598, Medical and Biological Laboratories, Co., Ltd., Nagoya, Japan), rabbit polyclonal anti-Tyrosine hydroxylase (TH; 1:250, #2792, Cell Signaling Technology Japan, K. K., Tokyo, Japan), mouse monoclonal anti-synaptophysin [SYP (SVP38); 1:200, sc-12737, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Dallas, TX, USA], mouse monoclonal anti-vesicular glutamate transporter 2 (VGLUT2; clone 8G9.2, 1:100, MAB5504, Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany, and mouse monoclonal anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP; clone 4901, 1:100, sc-57053, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.). VGLUT2 (Rose et al., ref. 2009; Krenzer et al., ref. 2011) and CGRP (Schwaber et al., ref. 1988; Dobolyi et al., ref. 2005; D’Hanis et al., ref. 2007; Miller et al., ref. 2012) are expressed in the MPB and the ventrolateral region of MPB, respectively. The fluorescence-labeled secondary antibodies were as follows: rhodamine-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (111-025-144, 1:200, Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc., West Grove, PA, USA) and rhodamine-conjugated donkey anti-mouse IgG (715-025-151, 1:200, Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc.). The fluorescence-labeled sections were mounted under coverslips with Fluoromount^MT (ID Labs, Inc., London, Canada). Immunoreactivity against GFP was detected by using a goat biotinylated anti-rabbit antibody (1:200, #BA-1000, Vector, Burlingame, CA), an ABC kit (VECTASTAIN Standard Elite, Vector), and DAB (Dojindo Molecular Technologies, Tokyo, Japan). The DAB-stained sections were mounted under coverslips with Permount (Fisher Scientific, Somerville, NJ) using a standard procedure.

Image acquisition

Optical images of whole cerebellums were obtained with a fluorescent stereomicroscope (MZ16F, Leica) attached to a CCD camera (DP-70, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). The images of sections were obtained with a fluorescent microscope (BX-50, Olympus) attached to a CCD camera (DP-71, Olympus) and an all-in-one fluorescent microscope (BZ-X700, Keyence Corporation, Osaka, Japan). The image data were manipulated with Photoshop CS5 (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA, USA) to adjust the color balance and the degree of brightness. Images of fluorescence were converted to black and white with Photoshop CS5 (Adobe Systems). Some of the monochrome images were inverted to black-and-white by Photoshop CS5 (Adobe Systems). Some images were traced in Illustrator CS5 (Adobe Systems). The confocal image data (immunohistochemistry for SYP and for VGLUT2: image size, 800 × 800 pixels; resolution, 0.265 μm/pixel; immunohistochemistry for CGRP: image size, 800 × 800 pixels; resolution, 0.106 μm/pixel) were acquired with a confocal fluorescence microscope (FV-1000, Olympus) and stored on a computer by using FLUOVIEW software (Olympus). The confocal image data were reconstructed into a stacked image by ImageJ software (Schneider et al., ref. 2012). Some stacked images were converted into a flattened, single image using the Z projection-Maximum Intensity command of ImageJ software. Some stacked images were reconstructed into 3D images by using the 3D projection-Brightest Point command of ImageJ software, and the 3D images were saved as movies.

Results

Anterograde labeling of cerebellar lobule IX by AAV-CMV-hrGFP

AAV-CMV-hrGFP is a recombinant AAV (serotype rh10) that expresses hrGFP under the control of a human CMV promoter. AAV-CMV-hrGFP was injected into cerebellar lobule IX of adult mice (n = 6, male). The fluorescence of hrGFP on a series of transversal sections of AAV-CMV-hrGFP-injected brains was imaged (Figure 1). In the cerebellum, local injection of AAV-CMV-hrGFP labeled only lobule IX with hrGFP (Figures 1A,B,A’,B’). The other cerebellar lobules, hemispheres, FL, and paraflocculus (PF) were negative for hrGFP (Figures 1A–I). The linear-shaped structures labeled by hrGFF in lobule IX were dendrites of Purkinje cells and processes of Bergmann glial cells (Figures 1A’,B’). Cerebellar interneurons in the molecular layer and granular cell layer were labeled by hrGFP (data not shown). Parallel fibers of cerebellar granular cells were also labeled by hrGFP, but the number of hrGFP-positive parallel fibers was small (data not shown). The infectivity of AAV vector (serotype rh10) to cerebellar granule cells seems to be low compared with Purkinje cells, Bergmann glial cells, and cerebellar interneurons.

No neurons in inferior olive (IO) and pontine nucleus (Pn), which send axonal fibers to the cerebellar cortex as a precerebellar nucleus, expressed hrGFP (Figures 1A”,B” and data not shown). The other precerebellar nuclei (Fu et al., ref. 2011), which are lateral reticular nucleus (LRt, Figure 1A), nucleus of the solitary tract (Sol, Figure 1A), caudal part of spinal trigeminal nucleus (Sp5C, Figure 1A), cuneate nucleus (Cu, Figure 1B), external cuneate nucleus (ECu, Figure 1B), ventral part of medullary reticular nucleus (MdV, Figure 1B), gigantocellular reticular nucleus (Gi, Figure 1C), interpolar part of spinal trigeminal nucleus (Sp5I, Figure 1C), parvocellular part of medial vestibular nucleus (MVePC, Figure 1C’), prepositus nucleus (Pr, Figure 1C’), X nucleus (XN, Figure 1E’), principal sensory trigeminal nucleus (Pr5, Figure 1I), and parvicellular part of motor trigeminal nucleus (data not shown), were negative for hrGFP. The result indicated that AAV-CMV-hrGFP (serotype rh10) had the ability of anterograde labeling but not retrograde labeling.

Many axonal fibers projecting from lobule IX were labeled by hrGFP. The hrGFP-positive axonal fibers were observed in the vicinity of cerebellar commissure (cbc; Figures 1C’,D’) and in the medial (fastigial) cerebellar nucleus (Med; Figures 1C’–F’), posterior interposed cerebellar nucleus (IntP; Figures 1D’,E’), superior vestibular nucleus (SuVe; Figures 1F’,G’), lateral vestibular nucleus (LVe; Figure 1F’), spinal vestibular nucleus (SpVe; Figures 1C’–E’), MPB (Figures 1H’–I’), and (LPB; Figures 1H’,I’). No hrGFP-positive axonal fibers were observed in the lateral (dentate) cerebellar nucleus (Lat; Figures 1D’–F’), anterior interposed cerebellar nucleus (IntA; Figures 1E’–G’), inferior cerebellar peduncle (icp; Figures 1E’,F’), medial cerebellar peduncle (mcp; Figures 1G’–I’), and (scp; Figures 1G’–I’, 2). The efferent fibers from lobule IX seemed to run through cbc (Figures 1C’,D’), enter into Med (Figures 1C’–F’), IntP (Figures 1D’,E’), and expand to SpVe (Figures 1C’–E’), LVe (Figure 1F’), SuVe (Figures 1F’,G’), LPB (Figures 1H’,I’), and MPB (Figures 1H’,I’,J,J‘). Axonal varicosities, which were likely presynaptic structures, were observed in MPB, Med, IntP, SuVe, LVe, and SpVe (MPB, Figure 1J”, arrowheads; the others, data not shown). The present result was supported by a previous study indicating that neurons in rat lobule IX project their axons to Med, IntP, and vestibular nuclei (LVe, MVe, SpVe, and SuVe,) (Kotchabhakdi and Walberg, ref. 1978; Balaban, ref. 1984; Bernard, ref. 1987). However, to date, there has been no report indicating axonal connection between lobule IX and MPB. We defined a region of interest (ROI) on the MPB (Figure 2, diamond pattern region). The ROI was located in the ventromedial region of scp, identical to the anterior region of MPB, and far from vestibular nuclei [MVePC, magnocellular part of medial vestibular nucleus (MVeMC) and SuVe]. The posterior region of MPB was eliminated from the ROI because it is adjacent to the vestibular nuclei (Figure 2, lower panel). In the ROI on MPB, we observed many hrGFP-positive axonal varicosities (Figures 1J–J”). We examined the axonal connectivity between the cerebellar vermis and the ROI on MPB.

Transversal sections of the brains injected with AAV-CMV-hrGFP into lobule IX were immunostained with anti-Tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) antibody, which is a marker for locus coeruleus (LC), to clarify the location of LC (Figures 3A–C). hrGFP-positive axons were observed in LPB, the ROI on MPB, the medial-most region of scp (mscp), and vsc but not in TH-positive LC, uncinate fasciculus of cerebellum (unc), and scp excluding mscp (Figures 3A–C). To examine whether a cerebellar lobule other than lobule IX projected to the ROI on MPB, we injected AAV-CMV-hrGFP into lobule VI (n = 5, male). Transversal sections of the brains injected with AAV-CMV-hrGFP into lobule VI were immunostained with anti-TH antibody (Figures 3D–F). In contrast to AAV-CMV-hrGFP injection into lobule IX (Figure 3B), when AAV-CMV-hrGFP was injected into lobule VI, no hrGFP-positive signals were observed in the LPB and the ROI on MPB (Figure 3E). However, hrGFP-positive axons from lobule VI were observed in the Med (data not shown). It is well known that Purkinje cells in the cerebellar vermis generally project their axons to the Med (Steward, ref. 2000; Martin, ref. 2012; Sengul and Watson, ref. 2012). The present results indicated that lobule VI does not project axons to the ROI on MPB.

The main routes of efferent fibers of the cerebellum are the icp, unc, and scp (Steward, ref. 2000; Martin, ref. 2012). Purkinje cells in the FL, PF, and lobule X project their axons to the vestibular nuclei through the icp. Neurons in the Med project their axons to the vestibular nuclei and the spinal cord through the unc and icp. Neurons in the interposed cerebellar nuclei and Lat project their axons to the contralateral thalamus, red nucleus, and spinal cord through the scp. However, efferent fibers from lobule IX to the MPB ran through the vsc (Figures 3A,B) but not the icp (Figures 1E’,F’), unc (Figures 3A,B), and scp (Figures 1G’–I’, 3A,B). Therefore, the axonal pathway between lobules VIII–X and the MPB differed from the general routes of cerebellar efferent fibers.

Transversal sections of the brain that are anterogradely labeled by the AAV-CMV-hrGFP injection into lobule IX were immunostained with anti-synaptophysin (SYP) antibody, which is a presynaptic marker, and imaged with a confocal microscopy (Figures 4A–I). Many hrGFP-positive axonal fibers were observed in the vsc (Figure 4A) and LPB (Figure 4D), but there were no SYP-immunopositive signals in the vsc (Figure 4B) and LPB (Figure 4E). These results indicated that the hrGFP-positive axonal fibers did not form synapses in the region of the vsc and LPB, and thus, the hrGFP-positive axonal fibers in the vsc and LPB were passing fibers. In the ROI on MPB, many hrGFP-positive axonal fibers were observed (Figure 4G), and furthermore, many hrGFP-positive axonal terminals were positive for SYP (Figures 4H,I, arrowheads). In addition, hrGFP and SYP double-positive signals were observed on the surface of cells in the ROI on MPB (Supplementary Movie 1). These results indicated that hrGFP-positive axonal fibers form synapses on neurons within the ROI on MPB. Furthermore, transversal sections of the brain that are anterogradely labeled by the AAV-CMV-hrGFP injection into lobule IX were immunostained with anti-VGLUT2 and anti-CGRP antibodies, which are markers for MPB neurons (Schwaber et al., ref. 1988; Dobolyi et al., ref. 2005; D’Hanis et al., ref. 2007; Rose et al., ref. 2009; Krenzer et al., ref. 2011; Miller et al., ref. 2012). The immunostained sections were imaged with a confocal fluorescence microscope (anti-VGLUT2, Figures 4J–L; anti-CGRP, Figures 4P–R) and a fluorescence microscope (anti-CGRP, Figures 4M–O). Most of cells within the ROI on MPB were positive for VGLUT2 (Figures 4K,L, arrows) and cells in the ventrolateral region of the ROI on MPB were positive for CGRP (Figures 4N,O, horizontal arrows). In addition, hrGFP-positive axonal terminals were observed on the surface of VGLUT2-positive cells (Figure 4L, arrows; Supplementary Movie 2) and CGRP-positive cells (Figure 4R, horizontal arrows; Supplementary Movie 3). These results indicated that the axonal fibers from cerebellar lobule IX ran along the vsc, passed through the LPB, and finally formed synaptic connection with neurons in the MPB. Taking all the above results into account, we found that the projection from lobule IX to the MPB was a novel neuronal circuit in the cerebellum. Therefore, we further investigated the neuronal connection between lobule IX and the MPB.

Retrograde labeling from MPB by fast blue

To examine brain regions projecting to the MPB, we locally injected Fast Blue, which is a typical retrograde tracer (Schofield, ref. 2008), into the unilateral MPB (n = 10, male; Figure 6). The images of Fast Blue-fluorescence were acquired from a series of transversal sections of the Fast Blue-injected brain. The Fast Blue injection point on MPB that was identified from the serial sections (Figures 5A–D) was located in the ROI on MPB (Figures 5A,B). The injection point in the MPB was densely labeled by Fast Blue (Figure 6A, arrow). Fast Blue-labeled passing fibers were observed in the LPB and vsc (Figure 6B). However, there were no Fast Blue-labeled axons in scp and unc (Figure 6B). This observation was consistent with the labeling of lobule IX by AAV-CMV-hrGFP (Figure 2A).

Interestingly, Fast Blue retrogradely labeled Purkinje cells in lobules VIII–X (Figures 6C’,D’,D”, arrowheads; lobule X, data not shown), FL (Figures 6E,E’, arrowheads), and ventral PF (Figure 6E’, arrowheads). Furthermore, Fast Blue-labeled Purkinje cells were observed only on the ipsilateral side of the Fast Blue-injected MPB (e.g., Figure 6C’). These results indicated that there are many Purkinje cells in lobules VIII–X, FL, and ventral PF that project their axons to the ipsilateral MPB. To confirm the axonal projection from cerebellar lobule VIII to the MPB, we locally injected AAV-CMV-hrGFP into cerebellar lobule VIII (n = 5, male; Figure 7A). hrGFP-positive axonal fibers were observed in the LPB, MPB, and vsc (Figure 7B). In addition, the scp and unc were negative for hrGFP (Figure 7B). This result (Figure 7B) was identical to the observation of AAV-CMV-hrGFP injection into lobule IX (Figures 1, 2A–C).

In contrast to lobules VIII–X, no Purkinje cells in lobules VI–VII were retrogradely labeled from the MPB by Fast Blue (Figure 6C’, VII; Figure 6D”, VI,VII). This result indicated that Purkinje cells in lobules VI–VII had no projection to the MPB. This result was identical to the observation of AAV-CMV-hrGFP injection into lobule VI (Figures 2D–F).

In contrast to lobules VIII–X, very few Purkinje cells in lobules I–IV were retrogradely labeled from the MPB (Figure 6E”, arrowheads; lobule I, data not shown). Interestingly, these Fast Blue-labeled Purkinje cells were aligned like a band in the transverse section (Figure 6E”, arrowheads). In addition, Purkinje cells in the bilateral hemispheres were not labeled by Fast Blue (Figures 6D,E, arrows). Taken together, Purkinje cells in the vermis, mainly lobules VIII–X, directly project their axons to the MPB, and the vsc is the route of axonal connection between the cerebellar vermis and the MPB. In the cerebellar nuclei, Fast Blue retrogradely labeled the ipsilateral IntP but not the bilateral IntA and Lat from the MPB (Figure 6F). Furthermore, the ipsilateral Med, especially the ventral part of Med, was more labeled by Fast Blue than the contralateral Med to the Fast Blue-injected MPB (Figure 6F). This result indicated that the ipsilateral IntP and the ipsilateral Med projected their axons to the MPB.

IO and Pn were not labeled by Fast Blue-injection into the MPB (Figures 6C,D; Supplementary Figure 1G). The regions retrogradely labeled from MPB by Fast Blue were the dorsal part of medullary reticular nucleus (MdD; Figure 6C), the rostroventrolateral medulla (RVL; Figure 6C), Sol (Figures 6C,D), Sp5C (Figure 6C), the paratrigeminal nucleus (Pa5; Figure 6D), and the parvocellular reticular nucleus (PCR; Figures 6D,E). The other regions in the brain stem, midbrain, and cerebral cortex were also labeled by Fast Blue (Supplementary Figure 1). Almost all of the Fast Blue-labeled regions are consistent with previous papers indicating afferent connections of the MPB (Herkenham and Nauta, ref. 1979; Cechetto et al., ref. 1985; Moga et al., ref. 1989; Herbert et al., ref. 1990; Dietrichs et al., ref. 1994; Caous et al., ref. 2001; Vertes, ref. 2004; Uschakov et al., ref. 2007; Tokita et al., ref. 2009; Coizet et al., ref. 2010; Dobolyi et al., ref. 2010; Nisimaru et al., ref. 2013; Akhter et al., ref. 2014).

Retrograde labeling from medial vestibular nuclei by fast blue

The vestibular nuclei are close to the MPB (Figure 2, lower panel; Figures 5C,G) and receive axonal inputs from cerebellar Purkinje cells (Thunnissen, ref. 1990; Bukowska, ref. 1995a,ref. b). If the Fast Blue that was locally injected into the MPB had leaked into the neighboring vestibular nuclei, the presence of Purkinje cells labeled by Fast Blue might have indicated their projection from the cerebellar cortex to the vestibular nuclei in addition to their projection from the cerebellar cortex to the MPB. To confirm whether Fast Blue selectively labeled projection neurons to the MPB (Figure 6), we injected Fast Blue unilaterally into the medial vestibular nucleus (MVe; n = 4, male; Figures 5G,H, 8A,B) and compared the distribution of Fast Blue-positive neurons labeled from the MPB (Figure 6) and the distribution of Fast Blue-positive neurons labeled from the MVe (Figure 8). The Fast Blue injection point on MVe that was identified from the serial sections (Figures 5E–H) was located in MVePC (Figures 5G,H, 8A,B). The Fast Blue injection point on MVePC (Figures 5G,H) was posteriorly apart from the Fast Blue injection point on MPB (Figures 5A,B) and thus the Fast Blue injection points did not overlap each other. The Fast Blue-positive Purkinje cells were observed in cerebellar lobules I–X, the copula pyramidis (Cop), crus1 of the ansiform lobule (Crus1), FL, and PF and existed in the bilateral side of the cerebellum (Figure 8, arrowheads). By contrast, when Fast Blue was injected into the MPB, the Fast Blue-positive Purkinje cells were observed in lobules I–IV, lobules VIII–X, FL, and PF on the ipsilateral side of the Fast Blue injected MPB (Figure 6). These results indicated that the distribution of Purkinje cells that projected their axons to the MVe was different from the distribution of Purkinje cells that projected their axons to the MPB. If Fast Blue that was locally injected into the MPB had leaked into the MVe (Figure 6), Fast Blue would have labeled Purkinje cells in cerebellar lobule VI–VII. Furthermore, MdD, Pa5, PCR, and Sol were not retrogradely labeled from the MVe (Figures 8C,D), though they were retrogradely labeled from the MPB (Figures 6C–E). If Fast Blue that was locally injected into the MVe had leaked into the MPB, Fast Blue would have labeled MdD, Pa5, PRC, and Sol. Consequently, Fast Blue-leakage into the adjacent nuclei seems to be minimized.

Retrograde labeling from MPB by AAV vector (retrograde serotype, rAAV2-retro)

A recent study reports an AAV vector performing efficiently retrograde gene-transfer, which is generated from AAV (serotype 2) by genetic modification of the viral capsid (Tervo et al., ref. 2016). This AAV variant is named rAAV2-retro. A rAAV2-retro expressing a fluorescent protein is useful as a fluorescent retrograde tracer and the efficiency of retrograde labeling by rAAV2-retro is better than a classical retrograde tracer (Tervo et al., ref. 2016). We generated AAV2retro-CAG-EGFP that is a rAAV2-retro expressing EGFP under the control of CAG promoter. To strengthen the results of retrograde labeling from MPB by Fast Blue, we locally injected AAV2retro-CAG-EGFP into the unilateral MPB (n = 6, male; Figure 9). One week after the injection, the injection point in the MPB was densely labeled by EGFP (Figure 9A) and located in the ROI on MPB (Figure 9B). The AAV2retro-CAG-EGFP was efficiently transported from axonal terminals to cell bodies of projection neurons of MPB and expressed EGFP in the projection neurons. As a result, cell bodies, dendrites, and axons of the projection neurons were visualized by the EGFP filling the projection neurons. EGFP-positive signals were observed in the cerebellum (Figure 9C). The EGFP-positive signals were located in the ipsilateral side to the MPB injected with AAV2retro-CAG-EGFP and observed in the lobule IV/V, lobule VIII, and lobule IX of the cerebellar vermis (Figure 9C, arrowheads). The lobule VI, lobule VII, and hemisphere were negative for EGFP. The serial transverse sections of the cerebellum were immunostained with anti-GFP antibody to enhance the EGFP signals (Figure 9D–G). The EGFP-positive signals in the cerebellum (Figure 9C, arrowheads) were identified as the dendrites of Purkinje cells labeled by EGFP. The EGFP-positive Purkinje cells were located in the ipsilateral side to the MPB injected with AAV2retro-CAG-EGFP (Figures 9D–G). In the lobules IV/V, the EGFP-positive Purkinje cells were aligned like a band and formed EGFP-positive two narrow bands (Figure 9D, arrowheads). In the lobules VIII–X, the EGFP-positive Purkinje cells were preferentially located in the medial region of lobules VIII–X and formed one wide band (Figure 9C, arrowheads in the lobules VIII and IX; Figures 9E–G). The lateral region of lobules VIII–X were negative for EGFP (Figure 9C, unfilled arrowheads; Figures 9E,F, unfilled arrowheads). Purkinje cells in the lobule VI, lobule VII, FL, PF, and hemispheres were negative for EGFP (Figures 9D–F, arrows; FL and PF, data not shown). The distribution of EGFP-positive Purkinje cells (Figures 9D–G) was similar to the distribution of Purkinje cells labeled by Fast Blue from MPB except for FL and PF (Figure 6). Pa5, PCR, RVL, Sol, and Sp5C were retrogradely labeled from MPB by AAV2retro-CAG-EGFP (Figure 9D; Supplementary Figure 2G) in the same way as the Fast Blue labeling from MPB (Figures 6C–E). The EGFP-positive regions in the brain stem, midbrain, and cerebellar cortex (Supplementary Figure 2) were identical with the brain regions labeled from MPB by Fast Blue (Supplementary Figure 1).

Retrograde labeling from lobule IX by fast blue

To examine brain regions projecting to lobule IX, we locally injected Fast Blue into lobule IX (n = 5, male; Figure 10). Lobule IX was selectively labeled by Fast Blue (Figure 10A). The other lobules, FL, PF, and hemisphere were not labeled by Fast Blue (Figure 10A; data not shown). The dorsolateral region of Pn (Figure 10B, arrowhead) and beta subnucleus of IO (Figure 10C, arrowhead) were retrogradely labeled from lobule IX by Fast Blue. Previous reports indicate that these subnuclei of Pn and IO project their axons to lobule IX, respectively (Bernard, ref. 1987; Sugihara and Shinoda, ref. 2004, ref. 2007; Voogd and Ruigrok, ref. 2004; Ruigrok et al., ref. 2015). This indicates that the retrograde labeling from lobule IX was performed successfully. The paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus (PVN; Figure 10D, arrowheads), ventrolateral region of periaqueductal gray (PAG; Figure 10E, arrowheads), parvocellular part of red nucleus (RPC; Figure 10F, arrowheads), paracochlear glial substance (PCGS) (which is a part of the cochlear nuclei) (Figure 10G, arrowhead), LC (Figure 10H, arrowheads), MPB (Figure 10I, arrowheads), which was within the ROI, and XN (which is a part of vestibular nuclei) (Figure 10J, arrowheads) projected to cerebellar lobule IX. Notably, PAG and PVN projected their axons to both lobule IX (Figures 10D,E) and the MPB (Supplemental Figures 1C,F,G). By contrast, lobule IX did not project to the LC (Figures 3A–C), PAG (data not shown), PCGS (Figure 1I’), PVN (data not shown), RPC (data not shown), and XN (Figures 1E’–G’). The LPB and cerebellar nuclei (IntA, IntP, Lat, and Med) did not project to lobule IX (LPB, Figure 10K; the cerebellar nuclei, Figure 10L). The cerebellar nuclei are close to lobule IX (Figures 1B’,C’). If Fast Blue that was locally injected into lobule IX had leaked into the neighboring cerebellar nuclei, Fast Blue would have labeled the cerebellar nuclei. In fact, the cerebellar nuclei were negative for Fast Blue (Figure 10L). Therefore, these results indicated that Fast Blue was locally injected into lobule IX without leaking into the neighboring cerebellar nuclei. The neural circuits between cerebellar lobule IX and the MPB are summarized in Figure 12.

Anterograde labeling from MPB by AAV-CMV-hrGFP

The Fast Blue-labeling of lobule IX indicated that MPB neurons projected to lobule IX (Figure 10I). To examine axonal inputs from the MPB to the cerebellum, we locally injected AAV-CMV-hrGFP into the unilateral ROI on MPB (n = 4, male; Figure 11). Fluorescence of hrGFP on a series of transversal sections of the AAV-CMV-hrGFP-injected brain was imaged. The MPB was densely labeled by hrGFP at the injection site of AAV-CMV-hrGFP Figure 11A, arrow). In contrast to the Fast Blue-injection into the MPB (Figure 6), there were no hrGFP-positive cells in the cerebellar cortex (Figures 11B–D). The cerebellum receives three distinct types of axonal inputs; mossy fibers existing in the granular layer (GL), climbing fibers existing in the molecular layer (ML), and beaded fibers along the Purkinje cell layer (PL) (King et al., ref. 1992). The mossy and climbing fibers in cerebellar lobules VII–X were negative for hrGFP (Figures 11B–D). By contrast, there were many hrGFP-positive beaded fibers in lobules VIII–X. hrGFP-positive beaded fibers were observed along the Purkinje cell layer (PL; Figure 11C, arrowheads), and a part of the hrGFP-positive beaded fibers extended to the molecular layer (ML; Figure 11D, arrowheads).

The vestibular nuclei that are close to the MPB (Figure 2, lower panel; Figures 5C,G) project their axons to the cerebellum as mossy fibers (Thunnissen, ref. 1990). If AAV-CMV-hrGFP that was locally injected into the MPB had leaked into the neighboring vestibular nuclei, hrGFP-positive mossy fibers would have been observed in the cerebellum. However, hrGFP-positive mossy fibers were not observed (Figures 11B–D). Therefore, local injection into the MPB was successful without unexpected labeling of the neighboring vestibular nuclei.

Discussion

Using anterograde labeling with an AAV vector, AAV-CMV-hrGFP (serotype rh10), and retrograde labeling by Fast Blue and an AAV vector, AAV2retro-CAG-EGFP (retrograde serotype), we found a direct connection between lobule IX of the mouse cerebellar vermis and the MPB. In contrast to lobule IX, there is no axonal connection between the lobule VI of the cerebellar vermis and the MPB. The direct connection between lobule IX and the MPB is a special neuronal circuit in the cerebellum, and this suggests that the cerebellum participates in regulating the sleep-wake cycle and the cardiovascular and respiratory responses by modulating the neural activity of the MPB.

Anterograde labeling with AAV vector serotype rh10

Recently, viral vectors expressing a fluorescent protein, such as GFP, have been applied to neural circuit labeling (e.g., AAV vector, adenoviral vector, Herpes Simplex viral vector, and Rabies viral vector). Each viral vector has a different viral tropism and efficiency of gene transfer (e.g., AAV vectors; Aschauer et al., ref. 2013; Murlidharan et al., ref. 2014). Viral vectors usually infect cell bodies of neurons at the viral vector injection site and perform anterograde labeling of the axons and dendrites by a fluorescent protein. By contrast, some viral vectors (e.g., adenoviral vector, Bru et al., ref. 2010; Hashimoto et al., ref. 2012; AAV vector, Tervo et al., ref. 2016; Rabies viral vector, Wickersham et al., ref. 2007) infect axonal terminals at the viral vector injection site and are retrogradely transported from the axonal terminal to the cell body of projection neuron, and as a result, the projection neurons are labeled by a fluorescent protein. If we use a viral vector for neural circuit labeling, it is necessary to select a viral vector that is suitable for the target brain region and for anterograde or retrograde neuronal circuit labeling. Our observations indicated that an AAV vector (serotype rh10) showed highly efficient gene transfer to lobule IX of the cerebellar vermis without retrograde labeling of projection neurons to lobule IX (Figure 1), in contrast to the other serotypes of AAV vectors (Murlidharan et al., ref. 2014). Furthermore, the AAV vector has an advantage over classical anterograde tracers of Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin (PHA-L) and biotinylated dextran amine (BDA) because the AAV vector is not incorporated by the passing fibers at the AAV vector injection site, unlike PHA-L and BDA (Chamberlin et al., ref. 1998; Wang et al., ref. 2014). Therefore, AAV-CMV-hrGFP, which is an AAV vector (serotype rh10) expressing hrGFP, was suitable for anterograde labeling of the efferent fibers of the local region of the cerebellum.

Retrograde labeling with fast blue

When Fast Blue is injected into MPB as a retrograde neuronal tracer, Fast Blue-labeling via axonal fibers passing through a Fast Blue-injection site and Fast Blue-leakage into the nuclei adjacent to MPB, which are LC, LVe, MVe, and SuVe, become subjects of discussion. Fast Blue is more readily taken up via intact axonal terminals than the passing fibers (Köbbert et al., ref. 2000). Therefore, it is considered that Fast Blue hardly labels axonal fibers passing through a Fast Blue-injection site. Fast Blue-leakage into the adjacent nuclei of MPB was evaluated by the comparison between Fast Blue-labeling from MPB (Figure 6) and Fast Blue-labeling from MVePC (Figure 8). Fast Blue is locally injected into the MPB (Figures 5A,B) and the MVePC (Figures 5G,H). The Fast Blue injection region on the MPB does not overlap with the Fast Blue injection region on the MVePC (Figure 5). The distribution of Fast Blue-labeled neurons projecting to MPB was different from the distribution of Fast Blue-labeled neurons projecting to MVePC. Consequently, we concluded that Fast Blue-leakage into the adjacent nuclei of MPB was minimized. However, further investigations on the afferent inputs to MPB are needed because it is difficult to completely eliminate Fast Blue-leakage into the nuclei adjacent to MPB. Our observation indicated that cerebellar lobule IX did not project to LC (Figure 3A) but Schwarz et al. (ref. 2015) indicate direct connection from cerebellar Purkinje cells in lobule IX to LC by rabies-virus-mediated retrograde neuronal tracing. This contradiction needs to be investigated in the future. The distribution of MPB-projecting neurons labeled by Fast Blue (Figure 6; Supplementary Figure 1) is similar to that of MPB-projecting neurons labeled by AAV2retro-CAG-EGFP (Figure 9; Supplementary Figure 2). This result strengthens the reliability of Fast Blue labeling from MPB. However, Fast Blue labels the FL and the ventral PF from MPB, but AAV2retro-CAG-EGFP does not. This discrepancy between Fast Blue-labeling and AAV2retro-CAG-EGFP labeling should be examined by an anterograde-labeling from FL and PF in the future.

Local heterogeneity of the connection from cerebellum to MPB

Retrograde labeling from the MPB indicated that the ipsilateral Purkinje cells in the cerebellar vermis directly projected to the MPB (Figures 6, 9). Furthermore, the direct connection between Purkinje cells of the cerebellar vermis and MPB is locally Non-uniform (Figures 6C’,D’,D”,E”, 9C–G). Many Purkinje cells in lobules VIII–X directly project to the ipsilateral MPB, but there is no axonal connection from Purkinje cells in lobules VI–VII to the MPB (Figures 6C’,D”, 9C–G). In contrast to lobules VIII–X, a small population of Purkinje cells in lobules I–V project to the ipsilateral MPB and they are aligned and form a sagittal band in lobules I–V (Figure 6E”, arrowheads; Figure 9D, arrowheads). The sagittal band in lobules I–V seems to concur with the zebrine II/aldolase C-positive sagittal band 2+ that is identical to zone Ax, which is formed by terminals of climbing fibers that originate from specific subnuclei of the inferior olive (Sugihara and Shinoda, ref. 2004, ref. 2007; Voogd and Ruigrok, ref. 2004; Namba et al., ref. 2011; Fujita et al., ref. 2014). The local heterogeneity of the axonal connection from the cerebellar vermis to the MPB suggests functional differences among lobules I–V, lobules VI–VII, and lobules VIII–X of the cerebellar vermis. Lobules VIII–X of the cerebellar vermis seem to be at the center of regulating the functions of the MPB from the viewpoint of the dense neural connection between lobules VIII–X and the MPB.

Cerebellar neural circuit contributing to the sleep-wake cycle, and cardiovascular and respiratory responses

The direct connection between lobules VIII–X and the MPB suggests that lobules VIII–X regulate the neural activity of the MPB. The MPB is involved in switching from REM sleep to Non-REM sleep and vice versa (Fuller et al., ref. 2011; Anaclet et al., ref. 2012; Hayashi et al., ref. 2015), and cardiovascular and respiratory responses (Nisimaru, ref. 2004; Song et al., ref. 2006). The neural circuits associated with cerebellar lobule IX and the MPB are summarized in Figure 12 in accordance with our observations and previous reports (Saper and Loewy, ref. 1980; Fulwiler and Saper, ref. 1984; Bernard et al., ref. 1993; Feil and Herbert, ref. 1995; Chamberlin et al., ref. 1998). The LC, PAG, and PVN project their axons to lobule IX of the cerebellar vermis as precerebellar nuclei. The LC and PVN are involved in regulating the sleep-wake cycle (for a review see Tsujino and Sakurai, ref. 2013). The ventrolateral part of the PAG contributes to negative regulation of REM sleep (Lu et al., ref. 2006; Sapin et al., ref. 2009). Lobule IX directly projects to the ipsilateral MPB. The MPB interconnects with many brain regions, including ipsilateral lobule IX of the cerebellar vermis (refer to Figure 12, Nuclei interconnected with MPB). The BNST, CeA, IL, LH, PAG, POA, PVN, Sol, VTA, and ZI of the nuclei interconnected with the MPB participate in regulating the sleep-wake cycle (for reviews see de Andrés et al., ref. 2011; Tsujino and Sakurai, ref. 2013). Furthermore, the LH, PAG, PVN, RVL, and Sol of the nuclei interconnected with the MPB participate in regulating the cardiovascular and respiratory responses (for reviews see Nisimaru, ref. 2004; Burdakov et al., ref. 2013). Especially, RVL is the center of cardiovascular control. Interestingly, PAG and PVN form a feedback loop with lobule IX through the MPB (Figure 12). This loop circuit seems to be important for the physiological function of lobule IX regulating the sleep-wake cycle, and cardiovascular and respiratory responses. It is supported by the fact that MPB, PAG, and PVN are involved in the cardiovascular control during sleep (for a review see Silvani and Dampney, ref. 2013). Patients with cerebellar malformation (e.g., spinocerebellar ataxia) often suffer from sleep disturbances, especially sleep apnea that is characterized by repeated pauses in breathing during sleep (Pedroso et al., ref. 2011; DelRosso and Hoque, ref. 2014; Canto et al., ref. 2017). This supports that the cerebellum contributes to breathing during sleep. Taking all the above facts into account, lobule IX of the cerebellar vermis appears to participate in the neural circuit of regulating the sleep-wake cycle, and cardiovascular and respiratory responses through the MPB. Lobules VIII and X are thought to establish the same neural circuit as lobule IX; however, this has not been confirmed. It is necessary to examine the neural circuit in which lobule VIII and lobule X participate. Furthermore, we need to examine the physiological connectivity between the cerebellum and the MPB with electrophysiological techniques, and determine whether cerebellar activity modulates the physiological function of the MPB that is involved in regulating the sleep-wake cycle, and cardiovascular and respiratory responses. The direct axonal connection between cerebellar lobules VIII–X and the MPB will help us to elucidate the relationship between cerebellar activity and physiological function regulating the sleep-wake cycle and the cardiovascular and respiratory responses.

Author contributions

MH designed the study, analysis and interpretation of data, and wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. AY constructed and purified AAV-CMV-hrGFP (serotype rh10). MT constructed AAV vector (serotype 9). SK and KK constructed and purified AAV2retro-CAG-EGFP. HY contributed to data interpretation and critically reviewed the manuscript. The final version of the manuscript was approved by all authors.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

1. F. Akhter, T. Haque, F. Sato, T. Kato, H. Ohara, T. Fujio. Projections from the dorsal peduncular cortex to the trigeminal subnucleus caudalis (medullary dorsal horn) and other lower brainstem areas in rats.. Neuroscience, 2014. [DOI | PubMed]
2. C. Anaclet, J. S. Lin, R. Vetrivelan, M. Krenzer, L. Vong, P. M. Fuller. Identification and characterization of a sleep-active cell group in the rostral medullary brainstem.. J. Neurosci., 2012. [DOI | PubMed]
3. D. F. Aschauer, S. Kreuz, S. Rumpel. Analysis of transduction efficiency, tropism and axonal transport of AAV serotypes 1, 2, 5, 6, 8 and 9 in the mouse brain.. PLoS ONE, 2013. [DOI | PubMed]
4. C. D. Balaban. Olivo-vestibular and cerebello-vestibular connections in albino rabbits.. Neuroscience, 1984. [DOI | PubMed]
5. J. F. Bernard. Topographical organization of olivocerebellar and corticonuclear connections in the rat–an WGA-HRP study: I. Lobules IX, X, and the flocculus.. J. Comp. Neurol., 1987. [DOI | PubMed]
6. J. F. Bernard, M. Alden, J. M. Besson. The organization of the efferent projections from the pontine parabrachial area to the amygdaloid complex: a Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin (PHA-L) study in the rat.. J. Comp. Neurol., 1993. [DOI | PubMed]
7. T. Bru, S. Salinas, E. J. Kremer. An update on canine adenovirus type 2 and its vectors.. Viruses, 2010. [DOI | PubMed]
8. D. Bukowska. Cerebellovestibular projection from the posterior lobe cortex in the rabbit: an experimental study with the retrograde HRP method. I. Topographical relationships.. Acta Neurobiol. Exp., 1995a. [PubMed]
9. D. Bukowska. Cerebellovestibular projection from the posterior lobe cortex in the rabbit: an experimental study with the retrograde HRP method. II. Zonal organization.. Acta Neurobiol. Exp., 1995b. [PubMed]
10. D. Burdakov, M. M. Karnani, A. Gonzalez. Lateral hypothalamus as a sensor-regulator in respiratory and metabolic control.. Physiol. Behav., 2013. [DOI | PubMed]
11. C. B. Canto, Y. Onuki, B. Bruinsma, Y. D. Van Der Werf, C. I. De Zeeuw. The sleeping cerebellum.. Trends Neurosci., 2017. [DOI | PubMed]
12. C. A. Caous, H. de Sousa Buck, C. J. Lindsey. Neuronal connections of the paratrigeminal nucleus: a topographic analysis of neurons projecting to bulbar, pontine and thalamic nuclei related to cardiovascular, respiratory and sensory functions.. Auton. Neurosci., 2001. [DOI | PubMed]
13. M. E. Carter, M. E. Soden, L. S. Zweifel, R. D. Palmiter. Genetic identification of a neural circuit that suppresses appetite.. Nature, 2013. [DOI | PubMed]
14. D. F. Cechetto, D. G. Standaert, C. B. Saper. Spinal and trigeminal dorsal horn projections to the parabrachial nucleus in the rat.. J. Comp. Neurol., 1985. [DOI | PubMed]
15. N. L. Chamberlin. Functional organization of the parabrachial complex and intertrigeminal region in the control of breathing.. Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol., 2004. [DOI | PubMed]
16. N. L. Chamberlin, B. Du, S. De Lacalle, C. B. Saper. Recombinant adeno-associated virus vector: use for transgene expression and anterograde tract tracing in the CNS.. Brain Res., 1998. [DOI | PubMed]
17. V. Coizet, E. J. Dommett, E. M. Klop, P. Redgrave, P. G. Overton. The parabrachial nucleus is a critical link in the transmission of short latency nociceptive information to midbrain dopaminergic neurons.. Neuroscience, 2010. [DOI | PubMed]
18. J. D. Cunchillos, I. De Andres. Participation of the cerebellum in the regulation of the sleep-wakefulness cycle. results in cerebellectomized cats.. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1982. [DOI | PubMed]
19. I. de Andrés, F. Reinoso-Suarez. Participation of the cerebellum in the regulation of the sleep-wakefulness cycle through the superior cerebellar peduncle.. Arch. Ital. Biol., 1979. [PubMed]
20. I. de Andrés, M. Garzón, F. Reinoso-Suárez. Functional anatomy of Non-Rem sleep.. Front. Neurol., 2011. [DOI | PubMed]
21. L. M. DelRosso, R. Hoque. The cerebellum and sleep.. Neurol. Clin., 2014. [DOI | PubMed]
22. W. D’Hanis, R. Linke, D. M. Yilmazer-Hanke. Topography of thalamic and parabrachial calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) immunoreactive neurons projecting to subnuclei of the amygdala and extended amygdala.. J. Comp. Neurol., 2007. [DOI | PubMed]
23. E. Dietrichs, D. E. Haines, G. K. Røste, L. S. Røste. Hypothalamocerebellar and cerebellohypothalamic projections–circuits for regulating nonsomatic cerebellar activity?. Histol. Histopathol., 1994. [PubMed]
24. N. V. Dipatrizio, K. J. Simansky. Activating parabrachial cannabinoid CB1 receptors selectively stimulates feeding of palatable foods in rats.. J. Neurosci., 2008. [DOI | PubMed]
25. A. Dobolyi, S. Irwin, G. Makara, T. B. Usdin, M. Palkovits. Calcitonin gene-related peptide-containing pathways in the rat forebrain.. J. Comp. Neurol., 2005. [DOI | PubMed]
26. A. Dobolyi, M. Palkovits, T. B. Usdin. The TIP39-PTH2 receptor system: unique peptidergic cell groups in the brainstem and their interactions with central regulatory mechanisms.. Prog. Neurobiol., 2010. [DOI | PubMed]
27. M. Dutschmann, T. E. Dick. Pontine mechanisms of respiratory control.. Compr. Physiol., 2012. [DOI | PubMed]
28. K. Feil, H. Herbert. Topographic organization of spinal and trigeminal somatosensory pathways to the rat parabrachial and Kolliker-fuse nuclei.. J. Comp. Neurol., 1995. [DOI | PubMed]
29. Y. Fu, P. Tvrdik, N. Makki, G. Paxinos, C. Watson. Precerebellar cell groups in the hindbrain of the mouse defined by retrograde tracing and correlated with cumulative Wnt1-cre genetic labeling.. Cerebellum, 2011. [DOI | PubMed]
30. H. Fujita, H. Aoki, I. Ajioka, M. Yamazaki, M. Abe, A. Oh-Nishi. Detailed expression pattern of aldolase C (Aldoc) in the cerebellum, retina and other areas of the CNS studied in Aldoc-Venus knock-in mice.. PLoS ONE, 2014. [DOI | PubMed]
31. P. M. Fuller, D. Sherman, N. P. Pedersen, C. B. Saper, J. Lu. Reassessment of the structural basis of the ascending arousal system.. J. Comp. Neurol., 2011. [DOI | PubMed]
32. C. E. Fulwiler, C. B. Saper. Subnuclear organization of the efferent connections of the parabrachial nucleus in the rat.. Brain Res., 1984. [DOI | PubMed]
33. J. C. Geerling, A. D. Loewy. Central regulation of sodium appetite.. Exp. Physiol., 2008. [DOI | PubMed]
34. J. C. Geerling, M. K. Stein, R. L. Miller, J. W. Shin, P. A. Gray, A. D. Loewy. FoxP2 expression defines dorsolateral pontine neurons activated by sodium deprivation.. Brain Res., 2011. [DOI | PubMed]
35. M. Hashimoto, R. Ito, N. Kitamura, K. Namba, Y. Hisano. Epha4 controls the midline crossing and contralateral axonal projections of inferior olive neurons.. J. Comp. Neurol., 2012. [DOI | PubMed]
36. Y. Hayashi, M. Kashiwagi, K. Yasuda, R. Ando, M. Kanuka, K. Sakai. Cells of a common developmental origin regulate REM/non-REM sleep and wakefulness in mice.. Science, 2015. [DOI | PubMed]
37. H. Herbert, M. M. Moga, C. B. Saper. Connections of the parabrachial nucleus with the nucleus of the solitary tract and the medullary reticular formation in the rat.. J. Comp. Neurol., 1990. [DOI | PubMed]
38. M. Herkenham, W. J. Nauta. Efferent connections of the habenular nuclei in the rat.. J. Comp. Neurol., 1979. [DOI | PubMed]
39. O. Hermanson, A. Blomqvist. Subnuclear localization of FOS-like immunoreactivity in the rat parabrachial nucleus after nociceptive stimulation.. J. Comp. Neurol., 1996. [PubMed]
40. D. Hockemeyer, F. Soldner, C. Beard, Q. Gao, M. Mitalipova, R. C. Dekelver. Efficient targeting of expressed and silent genes in human ESCs and iPSCs using zinc-finger nucleases.. Nat. Biotechnol., 2009. [DOI | PubMed]
41. A. Inutsuka, A. Inui, S. Tabuchi, T. Tsunematsu, M. Lazarus, A. Yamanaka. Concurrent and robust regulation of feeding behaviors and metabolism by orexin neurons.. Neuropharmacology, 2014. [DOI | PubMed]
42. K. Kaneda, H. Kasahara, R. Matsui, T. Katoh, H. Mizukami, K. Ozawa. Selective optical control of synaptic transmission in the subcortical visual pathway by activation of viral vector-expressed halorhodopsin.. PLoS ONE, 2011. [DOI | PubMed]
43. S. Kawai, Y. Takagi, S. Kaneko, T. Kurosawa. Effect of three types of mixed anesthetic agents alternate to ketamine in mice.. Exp. Anim., 2011. [DOI | PubMed]
44. J. S. King, S. L. Cummings, G. A. Bishop. Peptides in cerebellar circuits.. Prog. Neurobiol., 1992. [DOI | PubMed]
45. C. Köbbert, R. Apps, I. Bechmann, J. L. Lanciego, J. Mey, S. Thanos. Current concepts in neuroanatomical tracing.. Prog. Neurobiol., 2000. [DOI | PubMed]
46. N. Kotchabhakdi, F. Walberg. Cerebellar afferent projections from the vestibular nuclei in the cat: an experimental study with the method of retrograde axonal transport of horseradish peroxidase.. Exp. Brain Res., 1978. [DOI | PubMed]
47. M. Krenzer, C. Anaclet, R. Vetrivelan, N. Wang, L. Vong, B. B. Lowell. Brainstem and spinal cord circuitry regulating REM sleep and muscle atonia.. PLoS ONE, 2011. [DOI | PubMed]
48. W. B. Len, J. Y. Chan. Glutamatergic projection to RVLM mediates suppression of reflex bradycardia by parabrachial nucleus.. Am. J. Physiol., 1999. [DOI | PubMed]
49. J. Lu, D. Sherman, M. Devor, C. B. Saper. A putative flip-flop switch for control of REM sleep.. Nature, 2006. [DOI | PubMed]
50. R. Machold, G. Fishell. Math1 is expressed in temporally discrete pools of cerebellar rhombic-lip neural progenitors.. Neuron, 2005. [DOI | PubMed]
51. J. Martin. Neuroanatomy Text and Atlas, 4th Edn., 2012
52. R. L. Miller, M. M. Knuepfer, M. H. Wang, G. O. Denny, P. A. Gray, A. D. Loewy. Fos-activation of FoxP2 and Lmx1b neurons in the parabrachial nucleus evoked by hypotension and hypertension in conscious rats.. Neuroscience, 2012. [DOI | PubMed]
53. D. Miyamoto, D. Hirai, C. C. Fung, A. Inutsuka, M. Odagawa, T. Suzuki. Top-down cortical input during NREM sleep consolidates perceptual memory.. Science, 2016. [DOI | PubMed]
54. M. M. Moga, C. B. Saper, T. S. Gray. Bed nucleus of the stria terminalis: cytoarchitecture, immunohistochemistry, and projection to the parabrachial nucleus in the rat.. J. Comp. Neurol., 1989. [DOI | PubMed]
55. S. F. Morrison, K. Nakamura. Central neural pathways for thermoregulation.. Front. Biosci., 2011. [DOI | PubMed]
56. G. Murlidharan, R. J. Samulski, A. Asokan. Biology of adeno-associated viral vectors in the central nervous system.. Front. Mol. Neurosci., 2014. [DOI | PubMed]
57. K. Namba, I. Sugihara, M. Hashimoto. Close correlation between the birth date of Purkinje cells and the longitudinal compartmentalization of the mouse adult cerebellum.. J. Comp. Neurol., 2011. [DOI | PubMed]
58. N. Nisimaru. Cardiovascular modules in the cerebellum.. Jpn. J. Physiol., 2004. [DOI | PubMed]
59. N. Nisimaru, C. Mittal, Y. Shirai, T. Sooksawate, P. Anandaraj, T. Hashikawa. Orexin-neuromodulated cerebellar circuit controls redistribution of arterial blood flows for defense behavior in rabbits.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 2013. [DOI | PubMed]
60. G. Paxinos, K. B. J. Franklin. The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates., 2001
61. J. L. Pedroso, P. Braga-Neto, A. C. Felício, C. C. Aquino, L. B. Prado, G. F. Prado. Sleep disorders in cerebellar ataxias.. Arq. Neuropsiquiatr., 2011. [DOI | PubMed]
62. S. Richard, D. Engblom, J. Paues, L. Mackerlova, A. Blomqvist. Activation of the parabrachio-amygdaloid pathway by immune challenge or spinal nociceptive input: a quantitative study in the rat using Fos immunohistochemistry and retrograde tract tracing.. J. Comp. Neurol., 2005. [DOI | PubMed]
63. M. F. Rose, K. A. Ahmad, C. Thaller, H. Y. Zoghbi. Excitatory neurons of the proprioceptive, interoceptive, and arousal hindbrain networks share a developmental requirement for Math1.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 2009. [DOI | PubMed]
64. A. M. Rosen, J. D. Victor, P. M. Di Lorenzo. Temporal coding of taste in the parabrachial nucleus of the pons of the rat.. J. Neurophysiol., 2011. [DOI | PubMed]
65. T. J. H. Ruigrok, R. V. Sillitoe, J. Voogd. Chapter 9: Cerebellum and cerebellar connections A2 – Paxinos, George, in. The Rat Nervous System, 4th Edn. (, 2015
66. K. Sadakane, M. Kondo, N. Nisimaru. Direct projection from the cardiovascular control region of the cerebellar cortex, the lateral nodulus-uvula, to the brainstem in rabbits.. Neurosci. Res., 2000. [DOI | PubMed]
67. C. B. Saper, A. D. Loewy. Efferent connections of the parabrachial nucleus in the rat.. Brain Res., 1980. [DOI | PubMed]
68. E. Sapin, D. Lapray, A. Bérod, R. Goutagny, L. Léger, P. Ravassard. Localization of the brainstem GABAergic neurons controlling paradoxical (REM) sleep.. PLoS ONE, 2009. [DOI | PubMed]
69. C. A. Schneider, W. S. Rasband, K. W. Eliceiri. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis.. Nat. Methods, 2012. [DOI | PubMed]
70. B. R. Schofield. Retrograde axonal tracing with fluorescent markers.. Curr. Protoc. Neurosci., 2008. [DOI | PubMed]
71. J. S. Schwaber, C. Sternini, N. C. Brecha, W. T. Rogers, J. P. Card. Neurons containing calcitonin gene-related peptide in the parabrachial nucleus project to the central nucleus of the amygdala.. J. Comp. Neurol., 1988. [DOI | PubMed]
72. L. A. Schwarz, K. Miyamichi, X. J. Gao, K. T. Beier, B. Weissbourd, K. E. Deloach. Viral-genetic tracing of the input-output organization of a central noradrenaline circuit.. Nature, 2015. [DOI | PubMed]
73. G. Sengul, C. Watson. Chapter 13: Spinal cord, in. The Mouse Nervous System, eds, 2012
74. A. Silvani, R. A. Dampney. Central control of cardiovascular function during sleep.. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol., 2013. [DOI | PubMed]
75. G. Song, Y. Yu, C. S. Poon. Cytoarchitecture of pneumotaxic integration of respiratory and nonrespiratory information in the rat.. J. Neurosci., 2006. [DOI | PubMed]
76. O. Steward. Functional Neuroscience., 2000
77. I. Sugihara, Y. Shinoda. Molecular, topographic, and functional organization of the cerebellar cortex: a study with combined aldolase C and olivocerebellar labeling.. J. Neurosci., 2004. [DOI | PubMed]
78. I. Sugihara, Y. Shinoda. Molecular, topographic, and functional organization of the cerebellar nuclei: analysis by three-dimensional mapping of the olivonuclear projection and aldolase C labeling.. J. Neurosci., 2007. [DOI | PubMed]
79. W. F. Supple, B. S. Kapp. Anatomical and physiological relationships between the anterior cerebellar vermis and the pontine parabrachial nucleus in the rabbit.. Brain Res. Bull., 1994. [DOI | PubMed]
80. D. G. Tervo, B. Y. Hwang, S. Viswanathan, T. Gaj, M. Lavzin, K. D. Ritola. A designer AAV variant permits efficient retrograde access to projection neurons.. Neuron, 2016. [DOI | PubMed]
81. I. Thunnissen. Vestibulocerebellar and Vestibulo-Oculomotor Relations in the Rabbit. Ph.D. thesis,, 1990
82. K. Tokita, J. D. Boughter. Sweet-bitter and umami-bitter taste interactions in single parabrachial neurons in C57BL/6J mice.. J. Neurophysiol., 2012. [DOI | PubMed]
83. K. Tokita, T. Inoue, J. D. Boughter. Afferent connections of the parabrachial nucleus in C57BL/6J mice.. Neuroscience, 2009. [DOI | PubMed]
84. N. Tsujino, T. Sakurai. Role of orexin in modulating arousal, feeding, and motivation.. Front. Behav. Neurosci., 2013. [DOI | PubMed]
85. A. Uschakov, H. Gong, D. Mcginty, R. Szymusiak. Efferent projections from the median preoptic nucleus to sleep- and arousal-regulatory nuclei in the rat brain.. Neuroscience, 2007. [DOI | PubMed]
86. R. P. Vertes. Differential projections of the infralimbic and prelimbic cortex in the rat.. Synapse, 2004. [DOI | PubMed]
87. J. Voogd, T. J. Ruigrok. The organization of the corticonuclear and olivocerebellar climbing fiber projections to the rat cerebellar vermis: the congruence of projection zones and the zebrin pattern.. J. Neurocytol., 2004. [DOI | PubMed]
88. Q. Wang, A. M. Henry, J. A. Harris, S. W. Oh, K. M. Joines, J. Nyhus. Systematic comparison of adeno-associated virus and biotinylated dextran amine reveals equivalent sensitivity between tracers and novel projection targets in the mouse brain.. J. Comp. Neurol., 2014. [DOI | PubMed]
89. V. Y. Wang, M. F. Rose, H. Y. Zoghbi. Math1 expression redefines the rhombic lip derivatives and reveals novel lineages within the brainstem and cerebellum.. Neuron, 2005. [DOI | PubMed]
90. I. R. Wickersham, D. C. Lyon, R. J. Barnard, T. Mori, S. Finke, K. K. Conzelmann. Monosynaptic restriction of transsynaptic tracing from single, genetically targeted neurons.. Neuron, 2007. [DOI | PubMed]
91. Q. Wu, M. P. Boyle, R. D. Palmiter. Loss of GABAergic signaling by AgRP neurons to the parabrachial nucleus leads to starvation.. Cell, 2009. [DOI | PubMed]
92. Q. Wu, M. S. Clark, R. D. Palmiter. Deciphering a neuronal circuit that mediates appetite.. Nature, 2012. [DOI | PubMed]