Dronabinol
one-time oral administration of 5 mg dronabinol
Loading study record…
Cannabis use is associated with younger age at onset of bipolar disorder, poor outcome, and more frequent manic episodes, but the effects of cannabis on cognition are less clear. Contrary to reports among non-psychiatric patients, cannabis may improve cognition among people with bipolar disorder. Nevertheless, no study to date has systematically tested the acute effects of cannabis on cognition in bipolar disorder. Therefore, the investigators propose to determine the effects of oral cannabinoid administration on cognitive domains relevant to bipolar disorder, e.g., arousal, decision making, cognitive control, inhibition, and temporal perception (sense of timing). In addition, the investigators will evaluate different doses of the two major components of cannabis, cannabidiol and ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol, and compare them to placebo on these neurocognitive measures. The investigators will also test the effects of acute exposure to cannabinoids on cerebrospinal levels of anandamide and homovanillic acid - markers of endocannabinoid and dopamine activity in the brain, respectively. These studies will provide information that effectively bridges the fields of addiction and general psychiatry, informing treatment development for co-morbid substance abuse and psychiatric disorders.
Locally preserved from ClinicalTrials.govOpen ClinicalTrials.govlast source update 2024-05-10
What this record can show
This locally preserved record separates the registered protocol from source-reported registry results. Neither is a treatment recommendation.
Registry facts
Linked local records
Local links use governed condition terms or exact source-reported intervention names. They are navigation candidates, not efficacy claims.
Interventions
one-time oral administration of 5 mg dronabinol
one-time oral administration of 600 mg Epidiolex
one-time oral administration of placebo
Eligibility
primary outcomes
Time frame: one day
This is an experimental measure and not a scale with specific anchor points. Lower scores reflect increased risk-taking
Time frame: one day
This is an experimental measure and not a scale with specific anchor points. Higher scores indicate increased willingness to work for a reward
Time frame: one day
This is an experimental measure and not a scale with specific anchor points. Measures decision-making strategies such as win-stay, lose-shift.
Time frame: one day
This is an experimental measure and not a scale with specific anchor points. Higher scores reflect better attention and ability to discriminate important information from unimportant information
Time frame: one day
This is a physiological measure and not a scale with specific anchor points. Higher percent PPI reflects better sensorimotor gating
Time frame: one day
This is an experimental measure and not a scale with specific anchor points. Subjects' behavior in an open field (a room filled with novel objects) is quantified over a 15-minute period via amount of motor activity as measured by a wearable accelerometer. Increased motor activity reflects increased tendency to engage in exploratory behavior.
Time frame: one day
This is an experimental measure and not a scale with specific anchor points. Subjects' behavior in an open field (a room filled with novel objects) is quantified over a 15-minute period via video ratings that quantify number of interactions with novel objects. Increased object interactions reflects increased novelty-seeking behavior.
Time frame: one day
Reflects increased availability of the endogenous cannabinoid anandamide in the brain
Publications
No exact PMID-linked public article is currently readable locally.